Separating the channels did not help
What did work for me:
disabling ax radio on 2.4channel. So only a,g,b,n
This seems to work, a couple days stable.
Previously was using the vonnets Ethernet adapter, which worked for
months, but the radio just started to become unstable and needs a reboot
Hi there,
A few weeks ago I activated the 5 GHz. network with an SSID identical to
the 2,4 GHz. I was already using for my Squeezebox receivers.(same
passwords also)
I own 4 Logitech (WE) Radios and a Transporter.
The Transporter seems to ignore double SSID but the (WE) Radios get
confused
Heuer wrote:
> This is what Ubiquiti say:
>
> -"The main purpose of enabling band steering is to decongest the 2.4GHz
> due to the high number of users connected. Band steering allows users to
> connect to a 5GHz band which provides faster speed, and less
> interference, thus reducing the
This is what Ubiquiti say:
-"The main purpose of enabling band steering is to decongest the 2.4GHz
due to the high number of users connected. Band steering allows users to
connect to a 5GHz band which provides faster speed, and less
interference, thus reducing the congestion on the 2.4 GHz.
agbagb wrote:
> Ahh - thanks! On my French Freebox POP router, I can't find either what
> you describe, or the "band steering" that others have
> mentioned..
I am unsure what others have suggested. I presume by band steering
they are referring to auto-switching between 2.4G and 5Ghz
Ahh - thanks! On my French Freebox POP router, I can't find either what
you describe, or the "band steering" that others have
mentioned..
8.2.1 - 1639114554
Win11
Control: Web GUI; MaterialSkin on Android phones / pads
b) Freebox Pop Wifi6 / Mesh
External SSD, WiFi Laptop
2 x Touch
agbagb wrote:
> That's interesting - I'm not sure of correct terminology, but are you
> saying that getting the router to use a static IP (instead of an
> DHCP-allocated and changing one) has enabled a steady Radio
> connection even on WiFi6 kit?
No, not exactly. While I am a proponent of
sgmlaw wrote:
> If your equipment allows it, try binding the problem clients to the
> primary router or the AP that is allowing the initial connection. You
> may lose some roaming range, but it can solve the dropouts.
>
> We are now into our second generation of Asus WiFi 6 mesh systems, and
agbagb wrote:
> Similar problems in new home with new WiFi6. But I can't find
> anything called "band steering" in the router management, but what with
> moving and Madame preparing for knee surgery, I haven't really had a
> chance to see if this exists. Even with WiFi6 turned off,
Heuer wrote:
> I have a full Unifi system with four AP's (no Wi-Fi 6) and I lost
> connection to one of my three Radio's last week. Tried installing
> wlanpoke with no improvement and tried two different Vonets bridge's but
> neither would connect reliably. Whilst troubleshooting I found both
Heuer wrote:
> Maybe UE has a different WiFi chip?
Maybe. As far as I can see, there was no change to the WiFi element of
the firmware.
mrw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38299
View this
mrw wrote:
> An interesting observation .
>
> What firmware version are you using on the 'normal' Radios that are
> affected ?
>
> I think I would have expected no difference in behaviour.
All on latest community f/w. One UE which fails to connect, two Logitech
which have no problem
Similar problems in new home with new WiFi6. But I can't find
anything called "band steering" in the router management, but what with
moving and Madame preparing for knee surgery, I haven't really had a
chance to see if this exists. Even with WiFi6 turned off, the Radios
(Wlan-poked)
Heuer wrote:
> Whilst troubleshooting I found both the Radio and Vonets would connect
> reliably to the AP in my office but not to any of the other three AP's.
> A swift comparison of the AP settings revealed three had 'band steering'
> switched on whereas the Office AP did not. Switched all
I have a full Unifi system with four AP's (no Wi-Fi 6) and I lost
connection to one of my three Radio's last week. Tried installing
wlanpoke with no improvement and tried two different Vonets bridge's but
neither would connect reliably. Whilst troubleshooting I found both the
Radio and Vonets
mrw wrote:
> Logitech's players can't use the 5 GHz bands. The technology was not
> available when these devices were designed/manufactured.
Ah, Ok. Thanks. I thought Radio could.
JJZolx's Profile:
JJZolx wrote:
> Something I never asked (or looked for), but do the connection issues
> happen on both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands? I had been using only 2.4 GHz
> when all of my connection problems began.
Logitech's players can't use the 5 GHz bands. The technology was not
available when these
Something I never asked (or looked for), but do the connection issues
happen on both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands? I had been using only 2.4 GHz
when all of my connection problems began.
JJZolx's Profile:
Syco54645 wrote:
>
> I see the radio occasionally on my router but it drops off as soon as it
> shows up. It seems to be boot looping.
>
My bad. It would be boot looping because Squeezeplay didn't start, as
indicated by the fact that you could only see the Logitech screen.
The factory reset
Redrum wrote:
> Not familiar with wlanpoke, but...
>
> Power it off (press and hold power or unplug), then you can do a factory
> reset by press and hold '+' then press and hold power, release both when
> the screen wakes up. Should take you to initial config sequence.
>
> Jim
I was unsure
Syco54645 wrote:
> I was setting up wlan poke on one of my radios and I mist have
> fatfingered the rcS.local as the radio is no longer booting, it just
> sits on the logitech screen. Is there a way to get past this so that I
> can fix my gaf?
The -ssh- daemon and wifi should be running by
Syco54645 wrote:
> I was setting up wlan poke on one of my radios and I mist have
> fatfingered the rcS.local as the radio is no longer booting, it just
> sits on the logitech screen. Is there a way to get past this so that I
> can fix my gaf?
Not familiar with wlanpoke, but...
Power it off
I was setting up wlan poke on one of my radios and I mist have
fatfingered the rcS.local as the radio is no longer booting, it just
sits on the logitech screen. Is there a way to get past this so that I
can fix my gaf?
slartibartfast wrote:
> I have always left my router set to "Auto" channel bonding, whatever
> that means and never noticed any issues. Should it be set to 20MHz?
If it is not causing a problem then leave it.
Not sure if it only becomes a problem when a device on the same network
needs/requests
bpa wrote:
> Asus "Smart Connect" seems to be a load management by the router to
> spread devices across 3 bands (2.4Ghz and 2 5Ghz) all sharing same
> SSID.
> IIRC Some user reported problems with some dual/tri band routers if
> 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks had same SSID.
>
> Wifi 6 (aka
Asus "Smart Connect" seems to be a load management by the router to
spread devices across 3 bands (2.4Ghz and 2 5Ghz) all sharing same
SSID.
IIRC Some user reported problems with some dual/tri band routers if
2.4GHz and 5GHz networks had same SSID.
Wifi 6 (aka 802.11ax) compatible routers also
Is "Smart Connect"known as anything else? I can't finst any mention of
it in my router management menus Then again, there's no specic
mention of WiFi6 - just 802.11ax.
Having said everything worked last night - it then all stopped! I'll
have the apartment to myself for a few hours
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Cam you explain the 'right bandwidth' option?
> I suspect the setting 'channel optimization' in my router to be the
> cause of the disconnection of my radio.
>
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn Mi A3 met Tapatalk
No idea. The Asus is set to 20/40 MHz for channel bandwidth
Cam you explain the 'right bandwidth' option?
I suspect the setting 'channel optimization' in my router to be the
cause of the disconnection of my radio.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn Mi A3 met Tapatalk
LMS 8.3 (latest nightly) on Windows 10 (latest) as a Server (and
Raspberry PiCoreplayer as backup
agbagb wrote:
> Just an update - so, it was (easily, if a tad hidden in the Menus)
> possible to disable WiFi6 / 802.11ax, and everything (including the old
> laptop) works fine.
>
> The family have had enough of my "messing about" for the moment, but a
> tad later I'll try re-enabling
Just an update - so, it was (easily, if a tad hidden in the Menus)
possible to disable WiFi6 / 802.11ax, and everything (including the old
laptop) works fine.
The family have had enough of my "messing about" for the moment, but a
tad later I'll try re-enabling WiFi6, and see if the kit
Moving apartment here in Paris, I thought I'd ordered new ISP equipment
that would avoid the WiFi6 / Mesh issue, by ordering the Freebox Pop
When it arrived, there was a glossy note congratulating me on
being one the first customers to receive (at no extra charge.) the
shiny new
Is channel optimisation needed for fast roaming?
See this article and especially the end that suggests turning of fast
roaming unless using Enterprise WPA2 when old devices are around.
https://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless-infrastructure/wifi-fast-roaming-simplified
Paul Webster
author
Problem started with a new router and 3 smartwifipods. Together they
make a mesh network. Channel optimization is necessary for this network.
When I switch back to my former configuration with two old school AP's
connected to the new router the connection problems are over.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn
I did not read the whole thread. Could be someone suggested the
following already.
You should try to deactivate fast roaming on your router. At least with
my sb classics that trick worked.
michel's Profile:
pfcs49 wrote:
> I check in on this conversation now and then.
>
> I certainly hope some hero finds the solution.
>
> It seems cosmically unfair to have to dump five perfectly great Radios
> for no fault of their own!
I am glad to hear you are around and doing well Phil.
While there are
I check in on this conversation now and then.
I certainly hope some hero finds the solution.
It seems cosmically unfair to have to dump five perfectly great Radios
for no fault of their own!
pfcs49's Profile:
Redrum wrote:
> Paul, thanks for the further detail, but I am confused by this
> statement, did you mean to say "not"?
>
> To summarize my long winded explanation, the power line adaptors work
> best on two outlets on the same circuit (breaker), but also have a good
> chance of working if they
KeBul wrote:
> All this chatter on different voltage feeds/circuits is irrelevant to
> the OP (tswright)
> Kev
you brought the subject up in post #350. We were just responding to your
post, and trying to clarify what might work and why. Readers may think
"circuit" when indeed the device may
All this chatter on different voltage feeds/circuits is irrelevant to
the OP (tswright), being in Australia he will have a single phase supply
to his home... 220/230/240v - one live wire supplied to premises, I
think it's only North America that uses the 120v/240v split-phase
system.
And now
kidstypike wrote:
> Ouch! Sorry, post deleted. :o
no worries, you have given me puzzles before, though this was a new one!
:)
Jim
Redrum's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33806
View this thread:
Redrum wrote:
> not understanding what you are asking, my comment was based on Paul's:
> -"Thus it is *not* very easy to determine the power line ethernet
> adpater is on the same hot feed".-
>
> I was asking if "not" was intended because I think it is straight
> forward to determine if two
kidstypike wrote:
> For "hot" read "live"?
not understanding what you are asking, my comment was based on Paul's:
-"Thus it is *not* very easy to determine the power line ethernet
adpater is on the same hot feed".-
I was asking if "not" was intended because I think it is straight
forward to
Redrum wrote:
> Paul, thanks for the further detail, but I am confused by this
> statement, did you mean to say "not"?
>
> To summarize my long winded explanation, the power line adaptors work
> best on two outlets on the same circuit (breaker), but also have a good
> chance of working if they
P Nelson wrote:
>
> Thus it is not very easy to determine the power line ethernet adpater is
> on the same hot feed.
>
Paul, thanks for the further detail, but I am confused by this
statement, did you mean to say "not"?
To summarize my long winded explanation, the power line adaptors work
Redrum wrote:
> Gary, Kev, I think the labelling of "circuit" is misleading, while the
> same circuit is certainly ideal, what is really needed in the same "leg
> (line)". Here in the US (similar in Europe?), our power comes in as a
> "split phase" with 2 hots (legs/lines), a neutral, and a
tsrwright wrote:
> -... ]If you go down either route, there's plenty of people here who can
> help you get setup once we know which product you've gone for.
>
> Hope this helps-
>
> Many thanks all.
>
> Based on your advice I think the simplest solution is that as the
> office/study
H, I wonder channel optimization can be turned off?
Frankly, I am REALLY tired of this wifi issue. I have wlanpoke working
on the two SB radios I have. While it does help, I do miss parts of the
news broadcast when the disconnect happens. It is VERY annoying to have
it happen right in the
And I'm more of an experiment guy. Try it. If it works, great. If not,
then maybe explore why, or move to a different plan. :cool:
*Home:* Pi4B-8GB/pCP8.x/4TB>LMS 8.2.x>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
*Cottage:* rPi4B-4GB/pCP8.x/4TB>LMS 8.2.x>Touch>Benchmark DAC I, Boom,
Redrum wrote:
> Gary, Kev, I think the labelling of "circuit" is misleading, while the
> same circuit is certainly ideal, what is really needed in the same "leg
> (line)". Here in the US (similar in Europe?), our power comes in as a
> "split phase" with 2 hots (legs/lines), a neutral, and a
Thanks Jim. This makes perfect sense...and explains why it works for me.
Redrum wrote:
> Gary, Kev, I think the labelling of "circuit" is misleading, while the
> same circuit is certainly ideal, what is really needed in the same "leg
> (line)". Here in the US (similar in Europe?), our power
KeBul wrote:
> it is often mentioned not to use them on different circuits
>
> Kev
Gary, Kev, I think the labelling of "circuit" is misleading, while the
same circuit is certainly ideal, what is really needed in the same "leg
(line)". Here in the US (similar in Europe?), our power comes in as
-... ]If you go down either route, there's plenty of people here who can
help you get setup once we know which product you've gone for.
Hope this helps-
Many thanks all.
Based on your advice I think the simplest solution is that as the
office/study equipment works with wireless signals direct
garym wrote:
> I'm no expert on this, but I can say my radio connected to a netgear
> ethernet over powerline works flawlessly. The units are maybe 5 or 6
> years old. Also, by circuit, if you mean the outlets are on the same
> circuit breaker, at least in my case this is not required. My
I'm no expert on this, but I can say my radio connected to a netgear
ethernet over powerline works flawlessly. The units are maybe 5 or 6
years old. Also, by circuit, if you mean the outlets are on the same
circuit breaker, at least in my case this is not required. My ethernet
power unit is
tsrwright wrote:
> Only in three permanent places.
OK Thanks,
In that case, as Gary says you could use powerline adapters, personally
I'm not a fan of those but that's based on products from many years
back, but I'm sure they have improved considerably since I tried them.
All the outlets
tsrwright wrote:
> Only in three permanent places.
In that case, use the ethernet over power suggestion, but no need for
WIFI. plug in a connector near your radio and connect to radio with
ethernet cable.
*Home:* Pi4B-8GB/pCP8.x/4TB>LMS 8.2.x>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
KeBul wrote:
> Terry,
>
> Do you move your SB Radios around? i.e. they have batteries installed
> and you treat them as portable devices, or are they left in the same
> location hooked up to mains all the time?
>
> Cheers
>
> Kev
Only in three permanent places.
tsrwright wrote:
> I have just installed a (Telstra) 'Smart WiFi Booster' to replace an old
> device that wasn't reliably serving one end of the house.
>
> Seemingly at this point all three of my Squeezeboxes started to drop out
> after the same period of about 5 minutes working fine.
Thanks, I will try that, indeed I might even have the gear from a few
years back.
Sorry, I don't follow this:
'... If you heave Ethernet access newer the WiFi dead zone then a
standalone WiFi access point can work but then you have to remember to
turn off DHCP on it.'
Pair of powerline adapters. Connect one via Ethernet to your router
and the other (with WiFi access point built in
not all do) in a weak
WiFi area. Set this new WAP to same SSID, Auth type and passphrase as
your main one and you should find that things connect to it seamlessly.
Sometimes it
It's definitely the new extension that is causing the problem. Any
suggestions for extending a network without this trouble?
tsrwright's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=73074
View this thread:
tsrwright wrote:
> I have just installed a (Telstra) 'Smart WiFi Booster' to replace an old
> device that wasn't reliably serving one end of the house.
>
> Seemingly at this point all three of my Squeezeboxes started to drop out
> after the same period of about 5 minutes working fine.
I have just installed a (Telstra) 'Smart WiFi Booster' to replace an old
device that wasn't reliably serving one end of the house.
Seemingly at this point all three of my Squeezeboxes started to drop out
after the same period of about 5 minutes working fine. Rebooting the SB
restarts the
P Nelson wrote:
> The use of port forwarding to solve the SB Radio problem did not make
> any sense to me, but I am not wireless or networking expert. If you
> read through this thread the interference can be caused by a neighbor
> using Wifi6 standard. I am reasonably confident from my
Locutus1967 wrote:
> My SB Radio was up for 4-5 days and I had never seen it last that long,
> but this morning it disconnected from the wifi again...so alas...problem
> not solved.
The use of port forwarding to solve the SB Radio problem did not make
any sense to me, but I am not wireless or
My SB Radio was up for 4-5 days and I had never seen it last that long,
but this morning it disconnected from the wifi again...so alas...problem
not solved.
Locutus1967 wrote:
> Hi folks, I know this is a long thread but wanted to share my
> experiences with my SB Radio losing wifi connection.
Hi folks, I know this is a long thread but wanted to share my
experiences with my SB Radio losing wifi connection. I tried everything
in this thread: edit the WLAN file, moving to a dedicated 2.4 G network,
turning off beam forming on my mesh, even the faraday cage
nothing
worked until I did
jeff52807 wrote:
> Yes. And the problem radio had the issue of losing the wifi connection
> no matter where in the house that I tried it solo. Right now it's been
> working for going on 6 hours synched to a non-problem radio. I am
> puzzled.
I can't really help, all my radios are fine, I
Redrum wrote:
> Good thing you didn't spend your time wading, there is no Holy Grail :)
>
> so, ignoring sync for a moment, you can use a non-problem radio in the
> same location where your problem radio fails, and it operates fine?
> Stays connected?
>
> Jim
Yes. And the problem radio had
jeff52807 wrote:
> Bought it off eBay. It won't stay connected to my wifi for very long
> even though it's in the same room as my router. Didn't wade through all
> the posts, but one gave me an idea.
>
> I have several, so I brought another one into the same room and fired it
> up. Synched
Bought it off eBay. It won't stay connected to my wifi for very long
even though it's in the same room as my router. Didn't wade through all
the posts, but one gave me an idea.
I have several, so I brought another one into the same room and fired it
up. Synched my 'problem' radio to it.
slartibartfast wrote:
> Presumably the foil is positioned to only block signals from particular
> directions which is fine if you never move the radio [emoji2]
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
well, you can always but allot of conductive paint and get a silver or
copper colored radio!
slartibartfast wrote:
> Presumably the foil is positioned to only block signals from particular
> directions which is fine if you never move the radio
A shaped (e.g. parabola) foil can also focus signal from a specific
direction - so with judicious positioning - block the unwanted signals
and
Redrum wrote:
> as you said, discussed before, but I still am trying to wrap my head
> around how this could work without tying the foil to "ground" (say Vdd
> of the radio). From a physics standpoint. But if you did that do you
> essentially create a faraday cage (where nothing get through).
POMdev wrote:
>
> By the way, another user's suggestion to shield the radio with aluminum
> foil, along with a strong signal from a nearby access point, is now
> making more sense to me. By drastically reducing all the signals into
> the radio, the offending signals may not cause problems
P Nelson wrote:
> POMdev, one of you earlier posts mentioned the Wifi chip is Atheros
> 6002. (It took me a while to find that in the search.)
>
> I am wondering if someone tech savy could attempt to contact the
> manufacturer about an updated firmware that might solve the problem.
>
POMdev wrote:
>
>
> Moving to another location is a lot of work. You have to scout out a
> location, take your LMS machine and router, get power and an internet
> connection, and be prepared to hang around for a while. While some
> radios suffer 10-15 interruptions per hour, others are just a
Redrum wrote:
> ...moving to a different location and trying. ...
> also, when you say "where your phone reports very weak signals from
> neighbors, you mean with an app such as wifi analyzer, right?
The WiFiAnalyzer on Android is very suitable. It has a nice channel
graph. I haven't tried it
POMdev wrote:
> No need to move the router. Try your radio in a basement location where
> your phone reports very weak signals from neighbors. My 2 basement
> radios are in ordinary basement locations, the most interior one almost
> never fails, and the other one is "better." My worst radios
doubleugk wrote:
> ...I did another test and placed the SBR quite close to the router.
> Assuming that a strong wifi signal would dominate the competing wifi
> networks in the neighborhood. But unfortunately there is no difference,
> after about 20 minutes the SBR lost the wifi signal. ...
I
doubleugk wrote:
> Hello all,
> I did another test and placed the SBR quite close to the router.
> Assuming that a strong wifi signal would dominate the competing wifi
> networks in the neighborhood. But unfortunately there is no difference,
> after about 20 minutes the SBR lost the wifi
Hello all,
I did another test and placed the SBR quite close to the router.
Assuming that a strong wifi signal would dominate the competing wifi
networks in the neighborhood. But unfortunately there is no difference,
after about 20 minutes the SBR lost the wifi signal. What really makes
me
Redrum wrote:
> Well, there goes the rural/urban theory! :)
>
> I have offered in the past, and am still willing to send a known good
> radio (in the US) to a user having a problem to see if my radio behaves
> badly in their environment. I am willing to pay postage out, just ask
> for post to
Julf wrote:
> I think most of us are fine with our radios. I am in a pretty dense
> semi-urban environment with lot of electrical noise (everyone seems to
> have solar panels), and our 3 Radios work just fine.
Well, there goes the rural/urban theory! :)
my post was intended to be very tongue
Redrum wrote:
> well, that's a pretty negative take...but probably a pretty accurate
> summary of the family of radio woes threads. :)
>
> unfortunately, there seems to be no one size fits all, and no real good
> solutions if you want to run untethered (battery), but the range
> extender/vonet
rogingat wrote:
> I have been following this forum and others for months. There are
> hundreds of pages of questions and comments on this subject however no
> solutions! Yes, I have seen some software patches posted that are
> supposed to work. the only problem is most of us are not able to
rogingat wrote:
> I have been following this forum and others for months. There are
> hundreds of pages of questions and comments on this subject however no
> solutions! Yes, I have seen some software patches posted that are
> supposed to work. the only problem is most of us are not able to
rogingat wrote:
> I have been following this forum and others for months. There are
> hundreds of pages of questions and comments on this subject however no
> solutions! Yes, I have seen some software patches posted that are
> supposed to work. the only problem is most of us are not able to
rogingat wrote:
> I have been following this forum and others for months. There are
> hundreds of pages of questions and comments on this subject however no
> solutions! Yes, I have seen some software patches posted that are
> supposed to work. the only problem is most of us are not able to
I have been following this forum and others for months. There are
hundreds of pages of questions and comments on this subject however no
solutions! Yes, I have seen some software patches posted that are
supposed to work. the only problem is most of us are not able to install
this patch. I don't
Redrum wrote:
> wow, good for you! Can you explain a bit? There are a few here that are
> floundering around with the same issue (my radios are fine). I did a
> google search on port 3483 and most of the results were squeezebox
> related?
>
> I'm very curious as to what is
SlimChances wrote:
> My problem was related to incorrect firewall settings. Adding port 3483
> to the firewall corrected the problem
wow, good for you! Can you explain a bit? There are a few here that are
floundering around with the same issue (my radios are fine). I did a
google search on
doubleugk wrote:
> Hi same problem here with 3 SBRs. I've tried it with a hotspot network
> and after a short time the SBR looses connection, it doesn't matter if
> you connect the SBR to a local LMS or to mysqueezebox.com
> When wired, everything works fine. I haven't changed any hardware,
>
SlimChances wrote:
> EDIT: I think this is a different problem. My Radio will play internet
> radio streams(so wifi works) but not my local library. Will post in a
> separate thread.
Hi same problem here with 3 SBRs. I've tried it with a hotspot network
and after a short time the SBR looses
I got tired of the problem and just bought a TP-Link AV600 Powerline
Ethernet Adapter set from Amazon. One wall-mounted unit is wired at the
router location and the other is plugged in and connected to the
Squeezebox with an Ethernet cable.
For $37, I got rid of wireless. No problems in 6
SlimChances wrote:
> EDIT: I think this is a different problem. My Radio will play internet
> radio streams(so wifi works) but not my local library. Will post in a
> separate thread.
A blue wifi icon indicates that the wifi is connected to your AP and has
a working network connection. But the
I guess I am joining the chorus of those with Radios that will not
connect. Can someone confirm these are the symptoms. Blue wireless light
that doesn't change except briefly to red if I reboot. Also if I go to
network connections in Settings/Advanced and select the network it
appears to connect
The vonets wifi extender did the trick for me. Make sure you get the
blue VAP11G and not the white VAP11N. I went through 2 of the white ones
in a matter of months, but the blue VAP11G-300 has been going strong for
a year now. I also have a classic and a touch in the house but those
don't have
My Radio just got hit by this issue today.
I solved it by cutting over to Ethernet -- though I fully realize that
is not possible for many/most Radio users.
My two Touches have been suffering this issue for about 6 months.
The problem is a head scratcher.
I moved one Touch to Ethernet and
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
