[Resin-interest] Sharing cluster-sessions across multiple clusters.

2009-03-10 Thread Anders Søe
Hi, We are using the loadbalance/dispatch pretty much like in this example: http://www.caucho.com/resin/doc/resin-clustering.xtp#Dispatching where /foo dispatches to the foo-tier and /bar dispatches to the bar-bar The problem is with cluster-sessions in this setup is that foo-tier and bar-

[Resin-interest] Session-timeout in web.xml has no effect

2009-03-10 Thread Heimo Laukkanen
Hi all, we're running resin 3.17a and seem to have a problem with session timeouts. If I have in web.xml defined: http://caucho.com/ns/resin";> 120 It does not seem to have any effect on sessions. I added session listener and outputted debugging information: @Override

Re: [Resin-interest] Problem with rollover logs

2009-03-10 Thread Rob Lockstone
Can this bug be upgraded to Super Major Urgent? Ok, seriously, after hounding my management for weeks to finalize our Caucho contract, it's finally in "Accounting" to do the Purchase Order and release the funds. Then I'm on a tight schedule to start the upgrade process. I was planning on usi

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread wesley
Thanks Scott. How about Lighttpd? -Wesley - Original Message - From: "Scott Ferguson" To: "General Discussion for the Resin application server" Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:30 AM Subject: Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache? > > On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:14 AM, wesley wrote: > >> Hi

[Resin-interest] Resin Maven Plugin 3.2.1

2009-03-10 Thread Robert Dare
Hi, I just upgraded the resin-maven-plugin from 3.1.5 to 3.2.1. The first time I entered "mvn resin:run", it began downloading a ton of libraries and eventually failed, When I try to launch Resin via a "mvn resin:run", Maven fails with a number of missing dependencies. It seems that the Caucho M2

Re: [Resin-interest] Problem with rollover logs

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Kai Virkki wrote: > Hi! > > I just migrated from Resin 3.0.15 pro to 3.1.8 pro and have a problem > with log rollovers on Windows. I have defined the logs like this into > web-app-default: > > > > > Actually I use rollover-period with a longer time in production,

[Resin-interest] Problem with rollover logs

2009-03-10 Thread Kai Virkki
Hi! I just migrated from Resin 3.0.15 pro to 3.1.8 pro and have a problem with log rollovers on Windows. I have defined the logs like this into web-app-default: Actually I use rollover-period with a longer time in production, the above config just makes it faster to get to the error. I'm

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread david day
Very timely question for me. I've posted my failed attempts to build mod_caucho with no solution in sight. Because of this I'm evaluating dropping Apache for Resin, moving some Apache services to Resin, or dropping Resin for Tomcat. I'm just beginning to go through Resin docs to see if/how some

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Stargazer
I would dearly love to ditch Apache! The answer for us is our dedicated hoster uses Plesk, so as there are other users/apps on it who use the Plesk PHP panel for their regular admin we have to keep that. > After watching a few of these threads about people using mod_caucho with > Apache, it dawn

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Jan Kriesten
Hi, > a) The rewriting in resin is pretty good, its all regex, just like any > other rewrite. You may have to learn some new stuff, but that kind of > how IT works :) the rewriting in resin has it's limits - at least the last time I tried (I actually wrote to this list to get a replacement in

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:14 AM, wesley wrote: > Hi Scott, > >Here is my long wait question : > >How to configure Resin run with nginx? Hmm. nginx has a http proxy http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpProxyModule . However, it looks like they only support HTTP/1.0 on the backend, which

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Joseph Dane
On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Aaron Freeman wrote: > Why use Apache at all? you may have a situation where you haven't got a single webapp, but many webapps and other creatures living under a single host. in that case apache makes a nice top-level dispatcher, proxying requests to the vario

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread wesley
Hi Scott, Here is my long wait question : How to configure Resin run with nginx? regards Wesley - Original Message - From: "Scott Ferguson" To: "General Discussion for the Resin application server" Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:52 AM Subject: Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apa

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Andrea Sodomaco wrote: I like very mych Resin as app. server. but if we talk about http servers I think apache is more reliable, more documented, more flexible and faster. e.g. Header set Cache-Control post-check=36000,pre-check=99 That'

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread jkowall
I actually love IIS for static content, its very fast and the caching is great. It can beat apache hands down, but not sure on light ot ng. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Rachel McConnell wrote: > > > Static file serving, perhaps? I don

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Emil Ong
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:14:36PM -0500, Aaron Freeman wrote: > After watching a few of these threads about people using mod_caucho with > Apache, it dawned on me to ask an open-ended question: > > Why use Apache at all? > > I am sure there are good reasons for it out there, so I am just cur

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Jan Kriesten wrote: > > Hi, > >> Why use Apache at all? > > > there's more than one reason. Serving different sites/services on > the same > server, not all can be served by resin for various reasons: These are the typical reasons. If you're running a specific Ap

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Rachel McConnell wrote: > Static file serving, perhaps? I don't know the current benchmarks but > Apache has always had the reputation of being very fast for static > files, whereas that's not what resin is optimized for. > > I say this from the POV of not using Apa

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread jkowall
I don't agree with part 1 even, with the advent of vmware/xen/virtualbox there is no reason to cram a bunch of stuff on a single server. It makes your infrastructure way less upgradable, reliable, and testable. a) The rewriting in resin is pretty good, its all regex, just like any other rewrite.

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Andrea Sodomaco
I like very mych Resin as app. server. but if we talk about http servers I think apache is more reliable, more documented, more flexible and faster. e.g. Header set Cache-Control post-check=36000,pre-check=99 Scott Ferguson wrote: On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Daniel J. Dou

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Rachel McConnell
Static file serving, perhaps? I don't know the current benchmarks but Apache has always had the reputation of being very fast for static files, whereas that's not what resin is optimized for. I say this from the POV of not using Apache at all, though: we use resin behind HAProxy for load balancin

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Jan Kriesten
Hi, > Why use Apache at all? there's more than one reason. Serving different sites/services on the same server, not all can be served by resin for various reasons: a) Rewriting Service: mod_rewrite has no real pendent b) Different Servlet-Containers on port 80: There are a couple of servi

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel J. Doughty
Apparently they prefer the log output. I'll try to get you more specifics if I can. Scott Ferguson wrote: > On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Daniel J. Doughty wrote: > > >> Some of my developers prefer how Apache logs activity. >> > > Can you give some more details? The Apache /server-sta

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Daniel J. Doughty wrote: > Some of my developers prefer how Apache logs activity. Can you give some more details? The Apache /server-status or the log output or something else? Some of that logging might be straightforward to add to Resin. -- Scott > > > > A

Re: [Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel J. Doughty
Some of my developers prefer how Apache logs activity. Aaron Freeman wrote: > After watching a few of these threads about people using mod_caucho with > Apache, it dawned on me to ask an open-ended question: > > Why use Apache at all? > > I am sure there are good reasons for it out there, so I am

[Resin-interest] Why Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Aaron Freeman
After watching a few of these threads about people using mod_caucho with Apache, it dawned on me to ask an open-ended question: Why use Apache at all? I am sure there are good reasons for it out there, so I am just curious what the use-case is for using Apache plus Resin instead of using just

Re: [Resin-interest] Resin 3.0 and 3.1 with one Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 10, 2009, at 6:44 AM, Hari Selvarajan wrote: > Greetings, > > We run several web applications on Resin 3.0 with Apache and > mod_caucho > as a front-end. For a new web application that we're developing, which > will run under the same site, we'd like to use Resin 3.1 in a > different >

[Resin-interest] Resin 3.0 and 3.1 with one Apache?

2009-03-10 Thread Hari Selvarajan
Greetings, We run several web applications on Resin 3.0 with Apache and mod_caucho as a front-end. For a new web application that we're developing, which will run under the same site, we'd like to use Resin 3.1 in a different JVM. Something like this: +---> Web-app a (/a) (Resin 3.0,

Re: [Resin-interest] Change Port via web.xml

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel López
Hi, I'm not sure how the hoster came to told you that, but the web.xml file is the configuration for a specific application/context inside a host, and there can be several applications configured for a host, so it asolutely makes no sense configuring the host's port at the application level. I