Re: Lets Encrypt

I used the standard apache2 ssl template with the LE files like this: SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile "/etc/ssl/ example.com/example.com__fullchain.pem" SSLCertificateKeyFile "/etc/ssl/ example.com/example.com__privkey.pem" SSLCipherSuite

Re: Posting a review against multiple repositories.

how about having reviews follow the epic/story model... a parent review with child reviews. Each child review would be associated with individual repositories, and you then set it so that nothing can be landed until all related reviews are marked as ship-its? this might be much easier to achieve

reviewers idea

As previously discusses some teams have a requirement that you get two ship-its before landing, it would nice if this could be a setting in RB. It would also be nice if you have a "required reviewers" list so that something can't be landed without their say-so. The other reviewers list could

Re: site migration

AIUI, it's all in the database. https://groups.google.com/g/reviewboard/c/KHjIWCU_YJo well, apart from people's avatars, so I would back up htdocs/media/ On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 17:16, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for the hint, I'll bear it in mind. > > What I

Re: site migration

did you restore your SECRET_KEY? check your reviewboard settings_local.py file mine is in /var/www/reviewboard/conf/settings_local.py because that's the directory for my virtual http server in there you'll find this: # Unique secret key. Don't share this with anybody. SECRET_KEY =

Re: Review Board on Centos 7

selinux? -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are

Re: One of our user not receiving email notifications

do you have a local smtp server which relays the email, or are you directly injecting mail into google's MXers? if you have a local mail relay, can you check the logs and verify it is actually completing the email handshake with Google's MXers? -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Re: LDAP authentication error

On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 13:35, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Is my version (3.2.0) known to be problematic and are you suggesting 2.4.15 ? No, I just wanted to be sure that reviewboard would be able to load python ldap if it needed it. if you run "sudo netstat -anp | grep -E '389|636' " and then

Re: LDAP authentication error

On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 11:52, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > My LDAP settings: do you have python (2.x) ldap module installed? $ pip2 list | egrep ldap DEPRECATION: Python 2.7 reached the end of its life on January 1st, 2020. Please upgrade your Python as Python 2.7 is no longer maintained. pip 21.0

Re: Create likes to award for excellent piece of code or for an excellent review comment

we'd like to explore in the > future. > > If there are any ideas in the community on how this might look, please share > :) > > Christian > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:50 AM Paul Mansfield > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 20:26, Dmitriy Matison wrote: >&

Re: RBTools Ticket #4871: Unable to rbt post when using subversion after renaming a file

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4871/ -- New update by pfee For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4871 Reply:

RBTools Ticket #4871: Unable to rbt post when using subversion after renaming a file

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4871/ -- New ticket #4871 by pfee For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools Status: New Tags:

Re: Create likes to award for excellent piece of code or for an excellent review comment

On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 20:26, Dmitriy Matison wrote: > For the latter I want to award a guy with a like or some sort of a bounty > badge. I like this idea, Dmitriy is right, a code review can be a daunting thing for someone who's a new coder and can often leave people feeling battered and

Re: RBTools Ticket #4728: Git svn : diff can't be generated because of badly formatted call to git rev-list

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4728/ -- New update by KG For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4728 Reply: Is

Re: Restrict Submitter

as a thought. is it possible with RB to disallow the person submitting the review from being able to Ship-It? also, is it possible to make RB block the landing a review without two ship-it's from two different people? this would help enforce good practises, many orgs including ours require two

500 error when trying to download a CSV report "code review relationships" for everybody

I clicked on the Reports link in the top navigation and then selected code review relationships and selected everyone. I then clicked on the Download CSV link on the right hand side and got Something broke! (Error 500) It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either

Re: API call to search for all reviews where branch is a specific value

for searching the description and testing fields, a simple free text database like namazu would probably be a better way than using SQL to scan text fields. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out

Re: API call to search for all reviews where branch is a specific value

So unfortunately, not as clear-cut as I > was hoping. > > Going to need to ponder this... > > Christian > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:14 PM Christian Hammond > wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Hmm, I thought we had this as part of the API. I'll add that for

API call to search for all reviews where branch is a specific value

ces/review-request-list/ suggests there isn't that ability, it doesn't seem to be possible filter on the branch? then I would have to get a list of all review requests on a repository and then iterate and filter myself? thanks Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pa

Re: pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound error while testing rbt

IME, you're better off using pip to install it check whether pip has it installed: $ sudo pip list | grep -i rbt RBTools 1.0.2 then $ sudo pip install RBTools -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board

Re: LDAP Configuration

yes please, I had to use this flag: authlogin_nsswitch_use_ldap I already had the other flags in my deployment scripts in puppet. On Tuesday, 8 October 2019 11:54:38 UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:35 AM Paul Mansfield > wrote: > >> I fou

Re: LDAP Configuration

BTW, the secret magic command is sudo setsebool -P authlogin_nsswitch_use_ldap=1 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know!

Re: LDAP Configuration

I found the problem. facepalm. I should have guessed. damn selinux. I found it because I realised that the avatars weren't working as after fixing the directory permissions under .../htdocs/media they still didn't work, so I did a "setenforce permissive" and then discovered that, ldap login

Re: LDAP Configuration

identical, so I am wondering if there's another configuration file I need to tweak. thanks Paul - On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 19:32:00 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Does the LDAP server restrict access by IP address? > > Christian > > On Thu, Sep

Re: LDAP Configuration

t; on both. I am not sure how to go further with diagnosing the problem and what is broken, any ideas gratefully received, thanks Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://

Re: The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)

uild a new reviewboard server which can be independent from other things and thus not get snarled up with packages installed for the other services :-( In the long run when reviewboard runs on python3, then things will get simpler ;-) thanks very much for your time, Paul On Tuesday, 24 September

Re: The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)

it appears that somehow the pip installation of aws/awscli/boto/boto3/botocore was all fouled up... I removed them all and reinstalled them. along the way I also regenerated the access key for codecommit access, I'm not sure whether that was actually required or not. so it seems to be working

Re: The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)

and I see this in the http error log [Tue Sep 24 14:57:09.362504 2019] [:error] [pid 29304] 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'plans' [Tue Sep 24 14:57:09.362508 2019] [:error] [pid 29304] Traceback (most recent call last): [Tue Sep 24 14:57:09.362511 2019] [:error] [pid 29304] File

Re: The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)

if I try and look at the repo settings in our RB server https://rb/admin/db/scmtools/repository/5/?_changelist_filters=q%3Dpuppet then I see this: Something broke! (Error 500) It appears something

The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)

Hi, We do post-commit reviews in feature branches. We are using AWS CodeCommit as a git server and have PowerPack licences for it. I am trying to submit a review from a branch called DEVOPS-74b. I made a change, did a git add/commit/push to the branch. I know that the supposedly non-existent

Re: database backup and restore

Might I suggest a specific section be added to the admin guide explaining how to backup and restore a reviewboard installation? there's no mention of it here https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/3.0/admin/ if you're restoring a broken system, do you simply install the same version you had,

Re: Review Board Ticket #4839: Absolute date support

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4839/ -- New update by PGuehring For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4839

Re: Weird authentication issue - username + password not working with RBT

just a thought, but do your users have complex passwords with interesting punctuation? are they using single or double quotes when providing usernames/passwords and require complex escaping of punctuation? > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Re: rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 1333: ordinal not in range(128) (HTTP 400, API Error 224)

ok, this fix didn't break anything and I was able to submit a review on the feature branch which previously caused the codec error. thanks -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:

Re: rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 1333: ordinal not in range(128) (HTTP 400, API Error 224)

oh, wait... somehow pip got aliassed to pip3. now I've rerun without that, it worked. apologies for the distraction On Monday, 22 July 2019 12:21:48 UTC+1, Paul Mansfield wrote: > > thanks for that > > I think I am doing something wrong > > $ sudo pip install > ReviewB

Re: rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 1333: ordinal not in range(128) (HTTP 400, API Error 224)

unpack ReviewBoardPowerPack-3.0.3a0.dev20190701141953-cp27-none-any.whl Unpacking to: ./ReviewBoardPowerPack-3.0.3a0.dev20190701141953...OK /paul is puzzled. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBC

Re: Upgrading RB v2.5.6.1 to v3.0.15

AFAIK, you simply need to upgrade to the highest version of 2.5, and then upgrade to 3.x Do it on a backup copy of your production server https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2017/11/21/its-here-review-board-3-0-is-here/ https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/3.0/ --

rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 1333: ordinal not in range(128) (HTTP 400, API Error 224)

We've been using reviewboard for a few months now. The server is 3.0.15 on CentOS7, as is the client. I am using python 3.6.8 from the IUS repository. This is the first time I've encountered this error, trying to submit a post-commit review on a feature branch before it gets merged into

Re: rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 1333: ordinal not in range(128) (HTTP 400, API Error 224)

> > > I discovered it's possible to change the encoding on a repository, when logged in as admin, so I tried "utf-8" and "ascii" and it didn't make a difference. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from

rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error validating diff 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 1333: ordinal not in range(128) (HTTP 400, API Error 224)

We've been using reviewboard for a few months now. The server is 3.0.15 on CentOS7, as is the client. I am using python 3.6.8 from the IUS repository. This is the first time I've encountered this error, trying to submit a post-commit review on a feature branch before it gets merged into

Re: Page rendering and default route

check you have the following mappings in your apache config for reviewboard # Alias static media requests to filesystem Alias /media "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media" Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static" Alias /errordocs "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/errordocs" Alias /favicon.ico

Re: Reviewboard upgrade from v2.5.6.1 to v3.0.14

Provided your NFS storage is reliable and highly responsive, I don't see why you shouldn't put the service and the backing database onto an NFS store. Still, personally, I'd put it onto the fastest storage which is usually local virtual disk, and then ensure that I had good replication of the

Re: https://demo.reviewboard.org/ has broken ssl certificate

yes, that worked. the UI in Chrome for controlling HSTS is quite primitive, but did allow me to enter each domain in turn and delete from the cache. On Friday, 14 June 2019 11:17:55 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Unfortunately, you might have to clear > reviewboard.org/demo.reviewboard.org

Re: Reviewboard and Gitlab

I'd use the gitlab API to get a list of repositories https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/repositories.html and get a list of repositories in RB and compare and create as required https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/3.0/webapi/2.0/resources/repository-list/ -- Supercharge your Review Board with

Re: Reviewboard: You don't have permission to access / on this server.

Ensure the wsgi module is installed and loaded into your web server. In apache on centos, I have the following installed: mod_wsgi-3.4-18.el7.x86_64 uwsgi-plugin-common-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_64 uwsgi-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_64 uwsgi-plugin-python2-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_64

Re: Extend trial license

Just generate and install another evaluation powerpack licence. That worked for me. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know!

Re: https://demo.reviewboard.org/ has broken ssl certificate

starting at https://www.reviewboard.org/ I click demo down in the bottom nav bar. that link is for http://demo.reviewboard.org/ but it still gets redirected/bounced via www.reviewboard.com to the https demo.reviewboard.com I don't think Firefox honours HSTS? > -- Supercharge your Review

Re: programmatically add new repositories?

able to plug into reviewboard would be ideal. we're in the process of working out exactly what we need for our PPack licence, hopefully I should have authorisation to buy it soon. thanks Paul > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want

https://demo.reviewboard.org/ has broken ssl certificate

If you're going to enforce HSTS you need to keep the cert up to date because it entirely breaks access to the site when it expires Your connection is not private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from *demo.reviewboard.org* (for example, passwords, messages or credit cards).

RB 3.0.14 isn't on EPEL, only 2.5.x.

g CentOS 7, and although I could install from the tar ball from https://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/3.0/index.html I'd rather used a package. thanks for any hints, Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Boa

Re: Review Board 3.0.14 is out

erent EPEL mirrors. please can someone fix the uploads to EPEL? thanks, Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard

Re: Gitlab API version supported by ReviewBoard

Thanks for that! On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:47 PM Dunnigan (US), Terrence J < terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com> wrote: > Review Board 3.0.x supports GitLab API v4 > > > > Terry > > > > *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] &

Gitlab API version supported by ReviewBoard

Hello We're currently using GItlab EE v11.04 and we're having an error with adding repositories in ReviewBoard logs on Gitlab show ReviewBoard (our version is 2.5.15) is using v3 of Gitlab's API. I tried that and Gitlab's message is "API V3 is no longer supported. Use API V4 instead." Which

Re: Annotating Reviews

I've recently been posting large diffs for colleagues to review and had the same thoughts about being able to set the order of the files and perhaps annotate the code for the benefit of those reviewing my work. I'm currently using RB2.0. Would upgrading to RB3.0 help or are there plans to

Re: Exporting Reviewboard contents

Oct 15, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Gene Paul Quevedo <gene.quev...@gmail.com<mailto:gene.quev...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, Is there any tool, internal or external to Reviewboard, that can export reviews or review requests and so we can import them on another Reviewboard instance? Our use

Exporting Reviewboard contents

Hi, Is there any tool, internal or external to Reviewboard, that can export reviews or review requests and so we can import them on another Reviewboard instance? Our usecase on this matter is we have an external team coming in help us in on of our projects and we want them to have their own

Re: Experiencing migration issues from 2.0.25 to 2.5.15

etween attempts? It seems like there may > be some stale indexes sitting around. > > Christian > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Gene Paul Quevedo <gene.quev...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Christian, >> >> I (re) tried this procedure of creating a d

Re: Experiencing migration issues from 2.0.25 to 2.5.15

, and see if it goes through > successfully. > > If it doesn't succeed, show me the full output, and I'll probably be able > to narrow it down. > > Christian > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Gene Paul Quevedo <gene.quev...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Oops l

Re: Experiencing migration issues from 2.0.25 to 2.5.15

Oops looks like you might be right. Anyway here's our schema direct coming from our production site. Previously we were running 2.0.20, and the upgrade went smooth if I recall. On Monday, 21 August 2017 10:23:03 UTC+10, Gene Paul Quevedo wrote: > > hi Christian > > The schema is

Re: Experiencing migration issues from 2.0.25 to 2.5.15

this, unless carefully handled in a way compatible with > django-evolution's internals. > > Is this database schema the initial one applied from 2.0.25, or what you > have on the test server after the upgrade attempts? > > Christian > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Gen

Experiencing migration issues from 2.0.25 to 2.5.15

Hi, I'ts my first time to post here, and I hope someone can point me to the right way of solving this issue, even though it seems like there were issues like this before I'm trying to do a DB upgrade of Review from 2.0.25 to 2.5.15 on a test server with a copy of our Database, and seems like

Re: Review Board turns 10 today!

Fantastic achievement Christian, David and everyone else that has contributed. We use Reviewboard on a daily basis and it helps greatly with getting developers to engage in the review process. Well done and keep up the good work. Thank you, Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

/restore? Thanks, Paul On Saturday, December 5, 2015 at 12:05:06 AM UTC, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Hello, folks! It's time for a big update. As many of you are probably > aware, I maintain the RPMs of Review Board that live in Fedora's EPEL > project[1] (Extra Packages for Ente

Repository setup with clearcase, multiple vobs, and multiple views

Hi, We are trying to set up a trial of ReviewBoard using ClearCase. It seems that a repository on the server an only access one view on a particular ClearCase vob. There is an existing post which describes the problem perfectly, but unfortunately no one replied.

RB 2.5 and Comment Categorization extension

I'm having problems getting this extension working on a new RB 2.5 installation. I'm able to install the extension, enable it, and configure some comment types. However, when I go to add a review comment, the Type 'select' has no values. I've tried restarting my server but that didn't help.

Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!

with. Thanks, Paul On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:35:30 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Paul, These fixes are not. Interdiffs were largely rewritten since 1.7 and behave differently. We've had further changes since 2.0 (though we may backport some of these fixes

Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!

Hi Christian, I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes: * Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased changes Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch? Thanks, Paul On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote

RB 2.0.17 - Interdiff fails to highlight deleted code

on CentOS7 using EPEL packages. Let me know if you need more information to help recreate or fix this bug. Thanks, Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy

Re: Review Board 2.0.16 is released, with security fixes and more

let you know. In the mean time, ignore this bug report. Thanks, Paul On Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 3:16:14 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks for reporting this. I went through our caching code, and I'm not really sure why this is happening off-hand. Were you able to fix

Re: Review Board 2.0.16 is released, with security fixes and more

be to avoid caching diffs for drafts. A better fix would be to invalidate caches for draft diffs when a new diffset is uploaded. Hopefully those steps are clear enough for you to reproduce the issue. Let me know if you need more information. Thanks, Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board

Re: Review Board 2.0.16 is released, with security fixes and more

Hi Stephen, The 2.0.17 packages for EPEL7 worked as expected, karma dispensed. Thanks to all those that contributed to 2.0.16 and 2.0.17, I especially liked the fixes to the interdiff version selector as that was bugging me. The performance improvements are also nice to see. Cheers, Paul

Re: Review Board 2.0.16 is released, with security fixes and more

doesn't preserve line endings within the comment box. HTH, Paul On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 5:55:48 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM Christian Hammond chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: wrote: Hey everyone, We just put out a release of Review Board

Re: Review Board 2.0.13 is out!

/RBTools-0.7.1-1.fc21 Positive testing results from you will help other EPEL7 users benefit from these updates. Thanks, Paul On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:02:58 PM UTC, David Carson wrote: Will this show up in CentOS 7 yum soon? Also, I was expecting the RBTools update to show up

Re: Digest for reviewboard@googlegroups.com - 16 updates in 3 topics

. Then configure the repo in Review Board with a Raw file URL mask set to invoke the CGI script, hard-coding the repo name and replacing revision with the SHA-1 checksum. - If you drive fast enough, every traffic light turns green. Paul Sander Principal Member of Technical Staff, ScaleArc 2901

Re: Using Reviewboard with gitolite the right way?

The way I accomplished this was to configure a Git repo in Review Board using the ssh method (the git method will probably also work) to access the Git repo remotely on my central server, as the Path and Mirror path settings in Review Board. Then I wrote a CGI script that runs on the Git

Re: [Errno 13] Permission denied error when sending emails

httpd_can_sendmail 1 HTH, Paul On Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:17:22 AM UTC, Yang wrote: Hello Michaela, Could you please explain more how you fixed this issue? I meet the same problem of sending emails in web2py running on Apache (CentOS). Thanks! On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:03:51 PM UTC+2

Re: Fresh install on CentOS+EPEL - manual steps necessary beyond package installation

, then how do we go about updating those pages? What format are the pages written in? The longer term aim is that over time as some of the steps get incorporated in the distro packages or within rb-site install, then the manual install steps will shrink. Thanks, Paul On Friday, October 31, 2014

Re: EPEL - rb-site upgrade failure upon reboot prevents httpd startup

Hi Stephen, Your fix has resolved the issue on my system. Thanks for the rapid response. Cheers, Paul On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:39:53 PM UTC, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 16:27 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 11:04 -0700, Paul Fee

Fresh install on CentOS+EPEL - manual steps necessary beyond package installation

be incorporated in the ReviewBoard package or within the rb-site command? Perhaps rb-site could include hooks for distros to plug into their own customisations, e.g. SELinux configuration on Fedora/RHEL. Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up

EPEL - rb-site upgrade failure upon reboot prevents httpd startup

. Should systemd be using socket activation to start mariadb once a connection attempt is made? I believe the /etc/reviewboard/sites facility is unique to Fedora/EPEL, so this is could be a distro issue rather than ReviewBoard. Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http

Re: httpd remains in 'starting' state when starting via systemctl

, but hopefully the above sequence will help you reproduce his issue and enhance the auto upgrade feature you implemented for Fedora packages. Thanks, Paul On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:14:34 AM UTC+1, David Carson wrote: On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:10:51 PM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote

Re: RBTools 0.6.2 is released

Hi Stephen, Nice to see RBTools packaged for EPEL7. What's the status of ReviewBoard2 for EPEL7? Need any help? Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user

Re: Fedora rawhide: RB Dashboard missing Edit Columns button and column styling

Thanks Stephen and Christian, I've downloaded the rawhide updates from Koji and confirmed they've fixed this issue. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know

Re: Fedora rawhide: RB Dashboard missing Edit Columns button and column styling

they're both owned by python-djblets-0.8.1-1.fc21.noarch. Thanks, Paul On 2 June 2014 14:14, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 05/30/2014 12:57 PM, Paul Fee wrote: Hi all, On my Fedora rawhide system with RB2.0

Re: Problems upgrading from RB1.5 to RB2.0RC3

Thank you Christian and Stephen, I'm now able to upgrade my RB1.5 database to RB2.0 using the packages from Fedora Rawhide. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let

Re: Announcing the release of Review Board 2.0!

Thanks, it's working now following the python-djblets-0.8-7 update. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You

Re: Announcing the release of Review Board 2.0!

of Djblets? Looking in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8rc2-py2.7.egg-info/PKG-INFO, I see Version: 0.8rc2. Would the rc2 interfere with the version comparison? Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting

Problems upgrading from RB1.5 to RB2.0RC3

is not iterable === Anyone got ideas on what's wrong here? Shall I collect more information to help with debugging? Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com

Re: Reviewboard 2.0: rb-site upgrade failed migrating from 1.5.

105, in add super(AlterTableSQLResult, self).add(sql_result) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_evolution/db/sql_result.py, line 30, in add self.sql += sql_or_result TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable === Can you help with this problem? Thanks, Paul On 1

Re: Reviewboard 2.0: rb-site upgrade failed migrating from 1.5.

to RB2.0 and they passed. Can I collect more information for you to identify why this RB1.5 to 2.0 migration failed? https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/5756/ Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting

Re: Reviewboard 2.0: rb-site upgrade failed migrating from 1.5.

an intermediate version? Thanks, Paul On 18 April 2014 20:00, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Paul, rb-site upgrade isn't meant to be used on a completely empty database. It expects an existing install, so when you dropped and recreated the database, it was unable to find the state

memcached problems following 1.5 to 1.7.22 migration

others don't experience the same issue? Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message

Reviewboard 2.0: rb-site upgrade failed migrating from 1.5.

django.db.utils.OperationalError: (1054, Unknown column 'diffviewer_filediff.diff_hash_id' in 'where clause') Since this worked with reviewboard 1.7, I presume this is a bug in 2.0. Would you like more data to help diagnose the issue? Thanks, Paul -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org

Re: Required vs Optional Reviewers

Also, on review notification emails, people get email to them and the group gets CCed. Which fits what the OP asked for. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us

Re: ReviewBoard server tips over about twice a week

release, so my problems may well have been fixed in more recent versions. I expect you've got server issues different from mine, but MaxRequestsPerChild shouldn't do any harm. On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:19:17 PM UTC+1, Steve wrote: Thanks Paul, that's helpful. We're using the prefork

Re: ReviewBoard server tips over about twice a week

that MaxRequestsPerChild is taking effect. The config file contains a set of MPM tuning directives, duplicated for prefork and worker, make sure the required configuration is actually active. -- Paul On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:36:59 PM UTC+1, Steve wrote: I see the 'server cache' information

Error using post-review with git

Hi, I'm getting a confusing error when I try to run post-review Failed to execute command: ['git', 'config', 'core.bare'] I've tried running this command directly in the repository (a non-bare clone) and it simply returns. I'm not sure what response the script is expecting. I'm using git

Can't install reviewboard w/ mysql on mac

type will you be using? You can type either the name or the number from the list below. (1) sqlite3 (not supported for production use) Database Type: Thanks, Paul -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know

Re: Review board hanging / access issue..

' and rename 'reviewboard-dev' to 'reviewboard' Cheers, Paul On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Paul Schulz p...@mawsonlakes.org wrote: Hi Christian, Happy to be included in any migration script testing you may need. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com

Re: Review board hanging / access issue..

Hi Christian, Happy to be included in any migration script testing you may need. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Paul, patch actually doesn't listen. What's happening is that an Apache thread running Review Board has spun off a patch instance

  1   2   >