Re: [freenet-support] NAT & Freenet

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella, > >fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but > >downloading is

Re: [freenet-support] NAT & Freenet

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 11:05:14PM -0700, Galen wrote: > Hi, > > One of the places where I would like to use freenet is behind NAT. I > know all about port mapping, but this simply isn't available in this > situation. > > What is the hope of running Freenet? > > I know virtually every other pr

Re: [freenet-support] Current proportion of requests being accepted: 0, 660

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:56:49PM +0200, Rudolf Krist wrote: > Using unstable build 60058 > > Since I set the the number of download threads from 50 to 70 in FUQID > the proportion value began to decrease. Now ~ 2 hours running with 70 > threads it is at 0,660 and seems to stay at this level. Ug

Re: Minor update to script (Re: [freenet-support] log rotation)

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:11:17PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > Just noticed after I had uploaded the log rotate script that the date command > was being used in two locations. Stoopid. Uhm, what exactly is this supposed to do? If you are not using logRotate=true in the config file, then the n

Re: [freenet-support] NPE in build 5077

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 05:19:11PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > It is a known issue.. best workaround would probably be to remove the key > from the RSL:s maintenance-queue before actually closing it.. The workaround is easier than that. Just take getBuf() returning null to mean the same as proces

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Build 5077, problems with routing summary and log rotating

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 06:08:50PM +0200, Rudolf Krist wrote: > Toad schrieb: > > >On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>when I try to view <http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html> &g

Re: [freenet-support] The Freenet Experience

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 27 April 2004 10:53, Toad wrote: > > I assume you are using the stable branch? What build? Have you upgraded > > to 5077? And please show me the top few lines from > > http://127.0.0.1:88

Reminder re sessionv2 was Re: [freenet-support] Recognizable headers in Freenet conversation

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:11:37PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > I fired up Ethereal and let it capture for a few minutes, then looked for a > SYN packet. The first 0xc0 bytes of the conversation have what appear to be > easily recognizable bytes: 00 01 09 04 00 00, and a string of zeros later. >

Re: [freenet-support] some errors with build 5076

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 07:54:38PM -0400, Nikita Proskourine wrote: > Here is some selective filtering of my freenet.log for errors. I am > running FreeNet on WinXP with the bundled JRE (installed from scratch). > > A few minutes after I started my node: > > Apr 9, 2004 7:03:17 PM (freenet.suppo

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Permanent node question

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:05:43AM +, Psikic wrote: > Nicholas Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > This is an interesting comment. Could this really be why we are getting > > little response in last few months? > > > > I haven't used freenet for a few months... I just downloaded t

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Question re: accessing my Freenet node from another computer

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:15:16AM +, MonkeyOmen wrote: > Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hmmm.. That ought to do it.. If you spawn a standard apache on the linux > > machine, can your 10.* machines access pages from it successfully? > > Yes. > > > If not, then I think this is a

Re: [freenet-support] The Freenet Experience

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:16:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In einer eMail vom Fr, 23. Apr. 2004 5:45 MEZ schreibt Galen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >Hi Freenet People, > > > >I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm > >interested in those that use freenet. How

Re: [freenet-support] The Freenet Experience

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:02:47AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 23 April 2004 00:45, Galen wrote: > > Hi Freenet People, > > > > I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm > > interested in those that use freenet. How "usable" is it? What is your > > setup? What

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5077, Fproxy problems

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:28:06PM +1200, John Huttley wrote: > Toad wrote: > {many nice things} > > Thank you toad, a job well done! > > Could you please cast your eye to the http interface. > > What happens -- Has happend for ages.-- is that after a minimal amoun

Re: [freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, congratulations with the new stable version of Freenet. > > At this moment I am almost sure that there is a bug in Freenet, please > see the next line, that I copied from Performance --> General > Information:

Re: [freenet-support] Build 5077, problems with routing summary and log rotating

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote: > Hi, > > when I try to view > (the routing summary), I get nothing back. But in freenet.log I find the > following: D'oh. Will be fixed in 5078. > > 25.04.2004 15:46:34 (freenet.interfa

Re: [freenet-support] NPE in build 5077

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
Hmm, never seen that one before. Will commit a fix for 5078. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Marc wrote: > Hi, > > I just started to get these in the shell: > Caught java.lang.NullPointerException running maintenance queue > java.lang.NullPointerException > at freenet.Co

Re: [freenet-support] Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:50:51PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ole Tange > > Sent: den 26 april 2004 19:35 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [freenet-support] Automatic server retry of f

Re: [freenet-support] various problems

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
Are you investigating this one? Do you want me to have a look? I might make faster progress.. On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:03:38PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent:

Re: [freenet-support] various problems

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:16:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 13:03 MEZ schreibt "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>: > > >Does it increase _only_ when you insert or will it increase no matter > >what? > I think it increases also if I do not insert at

[freenet-support] Stable build 5077

2004-04-24 Thread Toad
Stable build 5077 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. All users of the stable branch should upgrade ASAP. This build has far too many changes to list exhaustively (but I tried, you can see the results in the commit comments). Some highlights: * Fixed a HUGE bug which was preventing i

Re: [freenet-support] out of date unstable snapshots on website

2004-04-23 Thread Toad
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:25:18PM +, zaphodbond wrote: > > The dated files containing updated snapshots on > http://www.freenetproject.org/snapshots/ > all seem to contain the out-of-date build 60043 > from the 3rd of april. > > The files are identical. > > 2,709,234 freenet-unstable-200404

Re: [freenet-support] (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network reading thread, NORMAL): resetting

2004-04-21 Thread Toad
Unfortunately this is normal when running Freenet on Windows. It is a well known bug. There is a workaround in the code, that produces the log message. It is possible that the 1.5 JVM, beta 2, fixes this. On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 12:12:05PM +, Nicholas White wrote: > I have just installed freen

Re: [freenet-support] Newbie help WinXP cannot access http://127.0.0.1:8888/

2004-04-21 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:05:49AM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 15 April 2004 04:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > However, whenever I point a browser to http://127.0.0.1:/ the > > browser continuously tries to return somethi

Re: [freenet-support] outgoing ports

2004-04-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:41:20AM -0700, gojyo wrote: > hi, > I have installed the freenet web interface on my pc; I've read that the freenet > client uses random port numbers for outgoing connections. Now, in my pc, I block any > outgoing packet from any port below 30.000 (I use Linux 2.4.22 an

Re: [freenet-support] log rotation

2004-04-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:28:06AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > I told Freenet to rotate logs, but instead it writes an apparently unending > string of logfiles. How do I tell it the number of logfiles to keep? Freenet doesn't really support log rotation in the sense that at present it does not d

Re: [freenet-support] newbie - Error: Route not Found

2004-04-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:27:22AM +0200, sdretu wrote: > Hello ! > > I just installed freenet. > I used the debian "stable" archive of freenet-unstable.ps aux > > Now I jump to the interface, browse http://localhost:/ and try to download > gpl.txt. What build number does it say? Most lik

Re: [freenet-support] node goes offline or changes IP address

2004-04-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:33:41AM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote: > Pierre Abbat wrote: > > >What happens to requests for information stored on my node if it goes > >offline for several hours and then comes back? What happens if the IP > >address changes? > > > > > Node downtime will affect the es

Re: [freenet-support] load average is too high

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 03:23:14PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2004 14:17, Toad wrote: > > You could try doCPULoad=true, but you'd have to turn off the background > > CPU hog. That makes the node tell other nodes to send it fewer queries > > until i

Re: [freenet-support] load average is too high

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 12:28, Toad wrote: > > What are the messageSendTime's like? I suppose you won't know if the web > > interface hasn't come up... What's the last thing in the logfile? > > The web interface comes up but is very slow. I turned t

Re: [freenet-support] load average is too high

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:15:17AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > I've been getting good results with the following: > > > > maxNodeConnections=128 > > maximumThreads=128 > > rtMaxNodes=256 > > targetMaxThreads=128 > > tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=12

Re: [freenet-support] load average is too high

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:15:17AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > I've been getting good results with the following: > > > > maxNodeConnections=128 > > maximumThreads=128 > > rtMaxNodes=256 > > targetMaxThreads=128 > > tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=12

Re: [freenet-support] DFI: New container version just inserted today

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > Thanks for the response anyway. :-) And don't feel bad about your "ignorance" > in certain areas. Most of us are still learning as we go here. :-) Including me! There's plenty of parts of the code that I'm not familiar with, an

Re: [freenet-support] long running node

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 02:27:05AM -0600, S wrote: > On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:33:41 -0800 > Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > contrary to everything in freenet's documentation, I have better luck > > retrieving with a freshly started/reseeded node than one that has been > > running for a whil

Re: [freenet-support] load average is too high

2004-04-06 Thread Toad
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:10:25PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > I'm running Freenet on a 48MB machine which is also running mprime. The load > average varies from 7 to 14, whereas before I started Freenet the load > average was around 1.3. I'm using j2re 1.5.0-beta, which I downloaded today > fr

Re: [freenet-support] network usage on start

2004-04-04 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:13:09PM -0500, Nick Tarleton wrote: > On Saturday 27 March 2004 12:25 pm, Christian Menz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > that _is_ freenet. It retrieves data, stored to your disk. When you query > > data, you retrieve from disks of other users :) > > > > Christian > > > > Am Sat,

Re: [freenet-support] network usage on start

2004-04-04 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 07:44:11PM +, Michal Charemza wrote: > Hi, I'm a bit of a newbie, so I'm not 100% sure that my answer is right, > but I think I can help: > > >I know. Perhaps I should clarify: it begins to download as soon as I run > >start-freenet.sh, > > > As soon as you start free

Re: [freenet-support] network usage on start

2004-04-04 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:10:21PM -0600, S wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0500 > Nick Tarleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know. Perhaps I should clarify: it begins to download as soon as I run > > start-freenet.sh, and keeps going for a while, even before I access > > fproxy/run

Re: [freenet-support] network usage on start

2004-04-04 Thread Toad
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 12:57:57PM -0500, Nick Tarleton wrote: > On Saturday 27 March 2004 03:10 pm, S wrote: > > When you start Freenet, it immediately tries to connect to as many nodes > > as possible, from the pool of nodes that it knows about. If what you're > > seeing is a bandwidth spike that

Re: [freenet-support] DFI: New container version just inserted today

2004-04-04 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 09:38:09PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > I wish I could answer you, but I have no idea what you are talking about. > Sorry. Much here is not clear to those that have not been worth the > developed throughout it's complete evolution. Conrad has changed the way that DFI (t

Re: [freenet-support] CS Project

2004-03-26 Thread Toad
Wrong. It's quite possible to interface to freenet on the FNP level. Have a look at freenet/client/FNPClient.java . On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:56:30PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:15:57 +1100, Craig Burton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Dear Freenet, > > :) > > >po

Re: [freenet-support] Router configuration problem

2004-03-24 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 04:11:31PM -0500, Brad Gilbert wrote: > I had to reinstall Freenet from scratch after an OS crash. It had been > running fine. Now I can't, for the life of me, get it passed my router. > The virtual server setting in the router still had the previous > listenPort so I jus

Re: [freenet-support] Pictures aren?t displayed

2004-03-24 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:38:06PM +0100, Michael Stather wrote: > Hi, > > using the newest version, when letting the client run for about 5 minutes to > connect and then opening an index page from the "gateway page", the page > loads immediately but the pictures aren?t displayed. One or two from

Re: [freenet-support] The freenet.ini

2004-03-22 Thread Toad
What exactly does the node say when you try to start it? Please stop the node, delete freenet.log, and start the node, to remove old cruft, then send me the log. On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:28:45PM +0100, Michael Stather wrote: > I forgot it! -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Proje

Re: [freenet-support] Various Freenet problems using latest version with WinXP

2004-03-18 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:24:08PM +0100, Michael Stather wrote: > Hi, > > I encountered 2 main poroblems trying to use freenet: > > 1. I?ve a router, and whatever I inser in the "ipadress" field of the > config, I get > > There was an error determining this node's physical address(es). > Plea

Re: [freenet-support] build 5076

2004-03-18 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:09:27AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > Using 5076 (stable) on dialup I actually retrieve a couple of files, first in > several weeks. Still have only outgoing connections after about 30 minutes, but log > looks much less confusing than most recent ones. 5074 actually

[freenet-support] Stable build 5076

2004-03-17 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5076 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. You can get the build via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable

Re: [freenet-support] SBC DSL -> pppoe NAT -> freenet node

2004-03-16 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:16:00AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote: > I've just discovered that my DSL connection gets a new > IP address on the order of every couple of minutes. Yikes! > I > don't know if it's because of my pppoe setup or > because of SBC, but I think that is what has been > causing my fr

Re: [freenet-support] doctype and other html tags through fproxy

2004-03-16 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:42:34PM +, Michal Charemza wrote: > Paul Derbyshire wrote: > > >What about inline images? > > > If tested this on a test freesite, and the scr for an inline image on > the WWW gets changed to > /__CHECKED_HTTP__www.urlofimage.com/directory/image.gif > > > On 15 Ma

Re: [freenet-support] doctype and other html tags through fproxy

2004-03-16 Thread Toad
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:42:36AM +, Michal Charemza wrote: > Hi, I have two questions: > > 1. All the sites I've viewed on freenet, don't have a full doctype tag, > they either have none, or just > > , instead of > > > The test site I inserted into my own node did have a full doctype ta

Re: [freenet-support] How do I add node refs to my node's routing table?

2004-03-16 Thread Toad
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 02:04:24AM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: > > I am having trouble trying to interconnect friends' freenodes. The give > me their node's reference but I keep getting complaints that the ref does > not contain an estimator fieldset. It should get added anyway. What

Re: [freenet-support] Exception thrown changing storage size

2004-03-16 Thread Toad
Perfectly normal. The node does not support changing the store size on the fly. It will be changed at the next startup. On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 08:46:34AM +0100, Thorsten Guenther wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > It's build 5074. > Any more info needed? > > T

Re: [freenet-support] Manually adding freenodes

2004-03-16 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:24:17PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: > > I have two freenodes running on separate networks (some stuff works, and > other stuff doesn't on one, and vice versa for the other) > > How can I manually reference the nodes to each other? (Hopefully this > will allow

[freenet-support] Stable build 5075

2004-03-13 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5075 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. You can get the build via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable

Re: [freenet-support] Error Report, 60006, start failed, reseeding

2004-03-13 Thread Toad
Should be fixed in 60007. Please try it and report if the bug still happens. On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:17:04PM +0100, Rudolf Krist wrote: > Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding) > > Details > I have got 2 computers in a small network. On one pc I already run a > unstable node for a lo

Re: Windows maintainer needed was Re: [freenet-support] ditto on what "b"said!

2004-03-13 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 04:50:15PM -, Dave wrote: > > A lot of the problem actually is due to users running nodes with old > > config files generated by the windows configurator, which forces all > > settings (doesn't write %'s), so they run with old settings such as 50 > > node routing tables,

Re: [freenet-support] Error Report, 60006, start failed, reseeding

2004-03-13 Thread Toad
Hmm. I thought I had fixed that... will investigate. On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:17:04PM +0100, Rudolf Krist wrote: > Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding) > > Details > I have got 2 computers in a small network. On one pc I already run a > unstable node for a long time. Now I wanted to

Re: [freenet-support] %initialRequestHTL=25

2004-03-13 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:15:54PM +0100, Rudolf Krist wrote: > Hi! > > In my freenet.ini File I have found the option %initialRequestHTL=25, % > means that this option is commented out. But I thought, that the options > that are commented out initially with %, are defaults, so I wounder if > t

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-13 Thread Toad
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:33:31PM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote: > Michael Schierl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > However, after a few tests (replaced Fred by a simple prog that says > > nothing but disconnects on a keypress) i can see that I get an > > IOException like the one above when the c

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2004-03-12 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:11:25PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: > > > > > There _has_ to be a question when installing asking the > > > user if he/she pays for bandwidth (esp outgoing) and set the configuration in > > > Freenet accordingly - bad press resulting from Joe Doe installing Fre

Re: [freenet-support] This error is showing up in my logs a LOT

2004-03-12 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:13:58PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Toad wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:46:55 +0000 > > From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Christopher Brian Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-12 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:09:09PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > Please provide reference to a good glossary. > > > > I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum > > precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an > > untrusted anonymous source) and it s

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-12 Thread Toad
gt; > In that case it means that an insert returned a DNF message which is > invalid according to the spec and thus treated as a RNF. (RFC1122 > Robustness principle). Toad told me that he had fixed that but most > likely he hasn't... > > > I also get quite some of these: &

Re: [freenet-support] Build 5073 : RouteNotFound Fetching (running) freenet.exe ???

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:36:09PM +0200, notmyrealemail wrote: > > Hello, > > Build 5073 seems to connect very poorly and the log is filled with > this kind of messages : > > 16:25:39 RouteNotFound Fetching (running) > freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED],Zt29QUMcl6ozbq4MqdSOhQ as > freenet.exe for

Re: [freenet-support] Just Getting Started

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:04:29AM +, Toad wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I > > had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'

Re: [freenet-support] This error is showing up in my logs a LOT

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
I'd guess it was a problem with the OS, or the JVM. You can however work around it by setting ipAddress= and ipDetectorInterval=0 in the config file (remove any preceding %'s or #'s first), and of course restarting the node. On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: >

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
ry fastjust in > a couple > > of hours. Most of the free-sites are accesible. Unstable works better > than > > stable though. But yup freenet is evolving and growing. Cheers to Toad, > Ian and > > the rest of the team. Hope I could get broadband and contribute one day :) &g

Re: [freenet-support] Periodically restarting the node...

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote: > Hello, > > > As on my system my node reliably goes haywire after about 6 to eight > hours I need to restart it periodically. I'm just wondering what the > effect is on how well my node is integrated in the network. What happen

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:18:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive > > criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be > > enhanced. Topics include installation,

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread, and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd want a real FCP spider; there must be one out there somewhere. On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at

Re: [freenet-support] Re: How to (REALLY) get on the NEW unstable branch

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:26:18PM -0500, Keith Botelho wrote: > you could get the latest build which is 6281. Uhmm, no, the latest build is 60,003 :) > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Stone Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:5

Re: [freenet-support] How to (REALLY) get on the NEW unstable branch

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
If you run behind a firewall, you are expected to be a power user. If you run on dialup, you are expected not to get very far. Apart from that, it ought to work, at least sometimes, even on the default stable network, according to recent support reports. On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 09:10:24PM -0500, N

Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:59:46AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > > Would you possibly agree with this, "There is no known way to meaningfully > evaluate the performance of freenet?" No. There are several ways to evaluate it. My favourite is "push/pull tests". Insert a file on one node, and fetch

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:28:10PM +, Toad wrote: > Is your dialup connection unmetered? If so, you may be able to run a > permanent node. Even if you can't, I suggest you run Frost (with a > smallish number of threads perhaps), it is good at generating traffic, > to help the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
nd growing. Cheers to Toad, Ian and > the rest of the team. Hope I could get broadband and contribute one day :) > Aryan > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 6:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
rsions. > I am downloading files all the time. For example I downloaded two 14GB > files that were inserted months ago successfully and very fastjust in a couple > of hours. Most of the free-sites are accesible. Unstable works better than > stable though. But yup freenet is evolving a

Re: [freenet-support] update.sh always overwrites seednodes.ref

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 03:41:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 13:32, Toad wrote: > > > > > The routing table will not be overwritten unless either: > > a) The seednodes.ref is more recent than the routing table OR > > b) The routing

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:31:37AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > Toad writes: > > >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > >>With the the latest stable builds, my "java hanging" problems have gone > >>away (I figure that they we

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
You don't get lots of RNFs? On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > Toad writes: > > >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > >>My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last > >>

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > Toad writes: > > >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > >>My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last > >>stable builds have been really good a

Re: [freenet-support] slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber. > > > >Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed a

Re: [freenet-support] slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 04:02:35AM -0800, miguel wrote: > duh, guys, I'm a newbie +- so I can only make observations so here: > (note: order does not indicate weight nor priority) > 1. Get a female to work on this thing. > 2. At least run permanent node. > 3. DSL ain't no faster when it hits the fr

Re: [freenet-support] update.sh always overwrites seednodes.ref

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Ruben Garcia wrote: > In connection with what Ian said about the hierarchy of classes of > freenet nodes (those in seednodes.ref > and the ones in these nodes routing tables, etc) > I think seednodes.ref should not be overwritten unless there is a > netwo

Re: [freenet-support] Data transfer problem

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:34:07PM +0100, no_dammagE wrote: > Hi, support team! > First of all, I would like to thank the whole freenet team for developing Fred. I > wish you good luck in the further development :) > > Now to the problem: > > I have two computers - one with WinXP (old, needs a

Re: [freenet-support] Query Rejecting

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:35:41PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:01:29 -0800 (PST), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Running build 5063; anybody have any idea why my node is rejecting all > >incoming requests? > > > >Current estimated load 100% [QueryRejecting all inco

Re: [freenet-support] REF seeding

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:54:59AM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: > > will running the freenet node over extended periods of time increase the > reliability of the cached seed nodes. I seem to be in a very unstable > part of the network and I can only seem to get like a 1% success rate on >

Re: [freenet-support] Just Getting Started

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote: > Hi, > > I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I > had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be > delighted and I don't think I'd have problems. But for now, my results > with freenet h

Re: [freenet-support] windows vs. linux.. bummer

2004-03-10 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote: > I do have a NAT box, but the listen port is forwarded. > And, my pants are pulled down on the box I'm running > freenet on (everything set to ACCEPT). Besides I when > I plugged the cable modem into the freenet box > (bypassing the NAT m

Re: [freenet-support] windows vs. linux.. bummer

2004-03-09 Thread Toad
Firewall? On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:18:27AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote: > Two systems: > 1) Very fast linux box running suse 9.0 DSL connection 1.2Mbit. > 2) Slower laptop running WinXP Cable modem < 1.0Mbit. > > I set up freenet 5074 on my linux box a few days ago. I have over 2.4Gb in my > store

Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings

2004-03-09 Thread Toad
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:31:05PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25 > >>[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 1

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet usability...

2004-03-09 Thread Toad
Curious. What build are you running? On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote: > Hello all, > > I used freenet a while a go. Until moving meant no broadband connection > for a while. I now have broadband again, and a machine I can leave on > all the time. So I looked into

Windows maintainer needed was Re: [freenet-support] ditto on what "b" said!

2004-03-09 Thread Toad
A lot of the problem actually is due to users running nodes with old config files generated by the windows configurator, which forces all settings (doesn't write %'s), so they run with old settings such as 50 node routing tables, which mean that the unix nodes run a lot better than the windows ones

Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings

2004-03-09 Thread Toad
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:28:36PM -0500, vinyl1 wrote: > OK, I have the latest build (5074), the latest seed nodes, the latest > everything I could find as of today, 3/8/2004 > > On the Web interface, I can't load The Freedom Engine, Dolphin's Free Index, > and Content of Evil. I can load the Fr

[freenet-support] Stable build 5074

2004-03-05 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5074 is now available. The snapshots will have been updated sometime in the next few hours. Once that has happened, you can get build 5074 via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http:/

[freenet-support] [toad@amphibian.dyndns.org: [Tech] Unstable build 6499]

2004-03-04 Thread Toad
Some people on support were having problems with unstable. If you run unstable you should read tech or devl and upgrade daily or so. - Forwarded message from Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: [Te

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5073

2004-03-03 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 05:34:21PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:15:27 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > be distributed more widely. Specifically, if the requestor cancels a > > transfer, we should still transfer the data. Of course th

[freenet-support] Stable build 5073

2004-03-03 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5073 is now available. The snapshots are being updated. You can get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Compilation error

2004-02-18 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:10:11AM -0800, Sheldon Young wrote: > > > javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar > > > -sourcepath src -d build -deprecation src/freenet/client/*.java > > > src/freenet/client/cli/*.java > > > src/freenet/support/servlet/http/HttpSessionImpl.java:

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Compilation error

2004-02-18 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:45:54PM +0100, Someone wrote: > Yoann schrieb: > > >I try to compile the lastest Freenet sources. > >I take the library freenet-ext.jar and junit.jar > >And when i do make, I have (I had -depecation) : > > > >javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar

Re: [freenet-support] Compilation error

2004-02-18 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Yoann wrote: > I try to compile the lastest Freenet sources. > I take the library freenet-ext.jar and junit.jar > And when i do make, I have (I had -depecation) : > > javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar > -sourcepath src -d build

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >