I believe it *is*
correct to name that way Munda Biddi Trail.
Ian
>
> HI,
>
> On some paths route signs have been used to 'name' the path.
>
>
> One example is the 'Great North Walk', a Sydney to Newcastle walking
route,
> where many of the paths existed bef
Yeah. Complete nonsense, unfortunately.
Ian.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, 12:25 am Ian Bennett, wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'll put my two boobs worth in here, but my information is
> extremely dated.
> When I was gliding back in the 80's, we used to fly from a privat
so could be used by
anyone. No windsock, no one else could use the strip (unless in an emergency).
That said, it could be an old wives' tale just to shut the "young'un"
up.
Ian
On 29/4/24 5:54 pm, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Thanks all - I'll drop that airstrip then.
>
>
As you say, they are trying to discourage walkers but nothing to indicate it
is not permitted to enter.
Path should be in OSM
Ian
> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:52:06 +1100
> From: Mark Pulley
> To: OpenStreetMap-AU Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths
Opps, sent too early, here's a second example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187347278#map=15/-31.9089/127.0839=
D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187347277
Ian
> Whether it's right or wrong, I don't know, but here's another example:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/
Whether it's right or wrong, I don't know, but here's another example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187347277
> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 20:12:35 +1100
> From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
> To: OSM Australian Talk List
> Subject: [talk-au] emergency highway airstrips
> Message-ID:
mapped in good faith.
We have tags to handle this scenario.
Ian
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, 6:34 PM wrote:
> Yes Ewen, I agree
>
> The OSM mission statement is at
> https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement
>
> I would like to see it also include something like Google's
Aren't most places classified by the government authority as
cities/villages/towns/localities/suburbs?
Is it done by population currently? I didn't think so..
Ian.
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 14:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Have just raised this for discussion on both the Forum & Disc
I think that if there has been *active* measures to rehabilitate the track
(eg "brushing over", track closed signs *and* barricades, then fair-enough,
delete/make invisible the track.
But if the land owner is not making much effort, we should map what's on the
ground.
Ian
>
Ben, thanks for the suggestions - I'll give them a go.
Ian
>
> The intersection in question is quite new, so I am not surprised that
there are
> cache issues as you guys have identified. Each routing engine will ingest
new
> OSM data on its own schedule.
>
> One th
Do you mean where Menang Drv curls around and meets Albany Hwy at a
T-junction? If so, I took the kink out yesterday (?) - maybe the renderer
hasn't caught-up with the change when you looked at it ??
Ian
>Hi
>Sorry if this is my misunderstanding but it seems that the same mistake
that i
There's some weird s^%t going on that's for sure. Yes, you can do what your
route intends - I just did it this afternoon.
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 5:58 PM
To: 'Ian Steer' ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [talk-au] Routing problem
=0
I don't know how to give OSM way references, but the intersection is at
S34.9647 and E117.8205 (Menang Drive and Albany Highway)
Has anyone got any clues why the GPS would be doing what it is doing ?
Thanks
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
it's wrong to think of alt_name as a "lesser" name.
Alternative means just that, it's an equally valid, but alternative name.
It's looks like exactly the type of scenario envisioned by the tag.
IMO it's a bad outcome to end up with multiple names in one tag separated
by a slash.
Ian.
I'm struggling to word this reply without being labelled racist or
discriminatory, but I believe the
English names should remain and the "alt_name" field be used for local names.
Anything else will render OSM data unusable to the majority of people in this
country.
Ian
On 6/6/23 8:
be convinced to change
my mind. And to my mind, if you committed an offence on national park land
above the high water mark, and tried to argue you were outside the park,
because of some geospatial alignment, I reckon you're cooked unless you
could find a legislative instrument to support that b
I agree with Ben, and I'd be very surprised if the OSM map of the city
cycleways wasn't far more accurate than that produced by CoS. Usually new
facilities are updated within days.
Ian.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 10:52, Ben Kelley wrote:
> Practically, using this data would be difficult I th
I also agree - but if there are several superchargers at the same location,
do they all get the same name? (probably)
Ian
On 16 December 2022 1:33:21 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>I think it's reasonable for it to have a name like "Tesla Supercharger
>Hollydene, NSW".
user does not ride a bike and does not like
bicycles sharing his/her path, and is on a bit of a crusade and no reasoning
or logic will be adequate to stop their mapping activities.
Ian
> Hi
> I have been monitoring the edits by a user who still "changes shared paths
to
> footp
Ignore this - I tagged it incorrectly and someone corrected it in the
mean-time
Ian
From: Ian Steer
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2022 4:15 PM
To: 'talk-au@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: Boardwalk not rendering
I added some boardwalk into the Cape To Cape walking track (in WA's
ave I done something wrong - or is it a rendering fault?
It is tagged as follows:
bridge=boardwalk (my sole edit was to add this tag)
highway=footway
motor_vehicle=no (I didn't add this - I think it is a useless tag but I left
it for consistency)
name=Cape to Cape Track
surface=unpaved
width
done if this approach doesn't seem to be
working.
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> What would people think about a structure that had a Munda Biddi master
> relation, containing only 3 sub-relations:
> 1. the existing relation containing the main route (including both north &
> south-bound one-way sections, plus the winter/summer routes)
> 2. a new
> "Munda Biddi Collie
> From: Ewen Hill
> Sent: Saturday, 10 September 2022 9:35 AM
> To: Ian Steer
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Should a "trail" route relation be one-way?
>
>I have been thinking of this with the new Collie township spur and the
> other oddities and especially the hu
> For the "north only" and "south only" segments, I would certainly keep both
> of these "directional" segments in the one "main" relation, but tagged with
> role tags: usually "forward" if the direction of the way corresponds to the
> direction of travel,
> JOSM's relation editor also pays
>
and winter routes
into the Munda Biddi Alternate relation) ?
My suspicion is that they should stay in the main route relation.
Regards
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
tes avoiding 100km/h+ roads, for example.
Ian.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
these creeks/rivers is that they are intermittent and might even be dry at
the time of year they are planning their trip. Ditto for "non-extreme"
4WDs.
Please don't restrict the map unnecessarily.
Regards
Ian
> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:06:05 +1000
> From: Graeme Fitzpatri
as a
footpath (and hence excluded bicycles), I have often changed it to a path,
but never tagged foot=yes and/or bicycle=yes.
Ian
>Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:55:42 +1000
>From: fors...@ozonline.com.au <mailto:fors...@ozonline.com.au>
>To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
nal manner that they seem to think TheSwavu is correct. You seem
to be quite emotional about the matter and maybe should take a step back and
consider what others have been saying.
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstr
Jim,
There are queries that I used at some points in the past to retrieve postal
codes in selected parts of Metro Manila, particularly Manila[0], Makati[1],
Pasig[2] and Muntinlupa[3], that can be used in Overpass Turbo[4]. The queries
can be modified to other parts of Metro Manila or Metro
"source:grade=as_signed"?? If a grade has been assigned by a user,
"source:grade=user" ??
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
a typo in entering a tag and
suggested:
- using "hiking_scale:awtgs: (as there were "hundreds of hiking_scale:"
tags in use in the European Alps")
- entering it into "the Wiki"
I would like to get a consensus so I can reinstat
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aadvertising
Maybe add a new value of "tower" or use the existing "column".
Ian
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 14:46, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> How should we tag these two towers, that seem to exist primarily or
> only for adverti
and that the data
will be released in due time.
Regards,
Ian Lopez
-
OpenStreetMap/Twitter/Telegram: ianlopez1115
Facebook/Messenger: ian.lopez
On Monday, October 11, 2021, 09:41:48 AM GMT+8, Erwin Olario
wrote:
This is a re-post [0] of a query I made in the OSMph Telegram channel
I have added a note in the Australian Tagging Guidelines about using “awtgs”.
It is my first time editing the wiki, so I hope I’ve done the right thing.
Ian
From: Phil Wyatt
Sent: Friday, 17 September 2021 3:52 PM
To: 'Andrew Harvey' ; 'Ian Steer'
Cc: 'OSM Australian Talk List
Ian, where did you go to learn what to do with this data ? (eg a nice little
website somewhere ??)
Ian
>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:18:39 +1000
>From: Ian Bennett
>To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [talk-au] Australian maps for Garmin devices
>Message-ID: <78b8c
jar to get these (along with contour
info from shonky maps) onto my (very, very old) GPS60CSX.
Full disclosure; I only use the '60 when bush walking, so I don't know if routing works and other
info works. That said, POI's do display.
YMMV.
Ian
__
Hello and good evening to all. The OpenStreetMap Philippines community will
hold a mini edit-a-thon on Saturday (February 13, 2021) from 1 PM [1] to 5 PM
[2].
The edit-a-thon aims to add and/or update the documentation of activities plus
other undertakings of the OpenStreetMap Philippines
Hi Nathan,
You need to unsubscribe yourself. Please follow the instructions here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:05 PM Natfoot wrote:
> Please unsubscribe me I am done with OSM for a while.
>
> Nathan P
> email: natf...@gmail.com
>
As a user, I would prefer to hear what I'm looking at. In other words, the sat nav is saying what
the signage is showing.
Ian
On 17/11/20 12:00 am, Aleksandar Matejevic (E-Search) via Talk-au wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed that the majority of ramps in Australia tend to have descriptive names
Emergency Access Points sound perfect
thanks all
Ian
From: Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
Sent: Thursday, 1 October 2020 7:09 PM
To: Phil Wyatt
Cc: Ian Steer ; OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Mapping emergency beach access numbers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
or the 7th access point to Leighton
Beach), along with emergency services contact information (eg dial 000).
How do we go about mapping these?
regards
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/lis
Hi everyone on this thread. It seems conversation has gotten way off topic
and heated, so I put a moderation hold on the list and won't let this
thread through for 24 hours or so.
Thanks,
Ian
talk-us moderator
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
Dear all members of OpenStreetMap USA,
My name is Ian Van Giesen and I am a resident and mapper in Athens,
Georgia. I recently sent an email to the email for Imports-OSM discussing a
possible import of address data in my area.
For fear of repeating myself, I will simply let you know that I
road into two separate ways for only a few metres seems
>excessive to me. Even when there is a several Meter long raised kerb
>separating the lanes I would not >split the road.
Could you please elaborate on this method you have been using ?
Ian
On 1 September 2020 10:05:42 pm AEST
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:34 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> 27 Aug 2020, 14:37 by ian.d...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 03:03 Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <
> talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Aug 27, 2020, 09:52 by
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 03:03 Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Aug 27, 2020, 09:52 by frede...@remote.org:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 27.08.20 00:30, Alex Weech wrote:
>
> They appear to be pulling straight from Google
>
>
> Interesting! I didn't know you could (show an
https://mapcarta.com/About_Mapcarta lists a contact email address:
m...@imedia.io.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:16 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone have contacts with Mapcarta?
>
> https://mapcarta.com/Eagles_Campground_2422656
>
> lists a camp ground that is not on OSM, and has never
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:CANCEL
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20200731T14Z
DTEND:20200731T15Z
DTSTAMP:20200731T080109Z
ORGANIZER;CN=ian.a.g...@gmail.com:mailto:ian.a.g...@gmail.com
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20200731T14Z
DTEND:20200731T15Z
DTSTAMP:20200731T075740Z
ORGANIZER;CN=ian.a.g...@gmail.com:mailto:ian.a.g...@gmail.com
ppropriate
to map this data.
Of course, if there is a usable, measurable form of this data, then sure,
lets do it. I'm simply saying that there are many items that don't
naturally fall within OSM data for a number of reasons.
Ian.
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 10:42, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
>
dary can be placed as a surveyable marker.
So, while they deserve attention and focus, if they can't be verified and
measured, then perhaps OSM isn't the right tool.
Ian.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Yes, I enabled moderation to cool off the "home rule" thread a bit.
I also stopped getting notification emails from the mailing list system
that any messages had been moderated. I didn't notice until I checked the
web interface. I've disabled the moderation for now.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:04
I plan to be there.
Ian
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 14:17, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Thursday March 5th 730 The Bull. Come with ideas for travelling meetings
> in the summer
>
> Regards
>
> Brian
>
> ___
>
e exit is not numbered in any way)
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
As a local, I think it should be tagged as commercial. There is some event
there most weeks. It's a very commercial organisation.
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, 09:58 Mark Goodge, wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> Someone has commented on a change I made to the Three Counties
> showground last year when I
(3286190),
which has lots of information about the signage on this exit. Do they need to
have the motorway_junction tag to record these details about the signage ?? -
and why wouldn’t they be using destination= ?
Ian
From: Andrew Harvey
Sent: Monday, 24 February 2020 11:14 AM
To: Ian
openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name> name=* of the
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> highway=motorway_junction
node.
I tried messaging this user a week-or-so ago and have had no response.
What do people think about this tag? I don't know what he is trying to
ac
I hope to be there.
Ian
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 18:14, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Good for me - I'll be there
>
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 13:12, Rob Nickerson
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> By my calendar it is the next meetup this coming Thursday. I am assum
from behind to lead OSM in this aspect now in Sydney in most areas.
That said, most motorways that have a wide shoulder, a cycle stencil, and
permit cycling have a bicycle lane indicated. I think this is probably
appropriate.
Ian.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 14:19, Sebastian S. wrote:
> Hi, w
Generally yes.
There are a few different treatments. The two main ones are where the
straight through cycle traffic remains to the left of a separated barrier.
Best example I can think of is at Ian Parade near concord.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PR6ShOVEl-hNO91xjsDwLQ
And there is also
point."
Ian.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 10:59, cleary wrote:
> The Jervis Bay Territory/NSW boundary is shown such that Jervis Bay
> Territory overlaps into parts of Shoalhaven Council area and NSW suburbs.
> Obviously not correct. There seems to be no source provided for the
> lo
From: Mateusz Konieczny mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com> >
Subject: Re: [talk-au] highway link is not linked to adequate highway/link
??
>> Is it intentional that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696446485#map=18/-32.14717/115.92374
in.
And for non-security controlled strips - what a polygon would mean is
unclear. The ownership boundary of the airport owner? The fence (if there
is one). Limits of access - if that is meaningful?
Ian.
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 19:39, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27/12/19 16:5
t work-out why ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78916457
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Nanga Rd in WA's south west has been affected by bauxite mining and has been
re-routed. I'm hesitant to simply delete the old alignment, and am
wondering whether there is an appropriate tag like "demolished=yes" to use
on it instead ?
Ian
__
t a access restriction would be inappropriate.
I've said before I agree with Andrew's proposed tagging for discouraged
access.
Ian.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 06:38, Sebastian S. wrote:
> So the sign is put up by the council. Is it not an official sign?
>
> Could someone elaborate on the legal side
I agree the meaning of "discouraged" is what we need here. But motor
vehicles are only discouraged if they aren't local traffic. Otherwise they
are perfectly fine.
So, I think the motor_vehicle:advisory=destination covers these two
concepts, and is a better representation.
Ian.
On
also not sure these signs have any legal effect at all. They aren't
privately owned. The signs are just street decorations. I'd be inclined
to
Ian.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 22:36, Nemanja Bračko wrote:
> I would agree with David on this.
> In that way you will avoid routing thru these s
I personally prefer to retain exit/interchange names from expressway ramps but
I have no problem with moving such names to motorway junctions.
Aside: Are we the only country that has exit/interchange names on expressway
ramps?
Regards,
Ian Lopez
-
Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com
Sounds OK
(I'll have to change my mapping practices)
Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
I use Vespucci on Android.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blau.android=en_AU
In addition to being a fully capable editor, you can add notes, and see
others notes at your location.
Ian.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 09:06, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
plan. And we run up against this all the time with cycling
infrastructure being added from a council plan where none may ever get
constructed or exist on the ground. And lots of plans can be made and
change before a sod is turned.
Ian.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 09:43, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
For the Three Counties Showground in Malvern
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35432806 is tagged with
landuse=commercial. Any given the number of events there most of which are
commercial. Commercial would be correct. That how the NEC is mapped
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243830271.
Ian
a building next to a private swimming pool
as anything other than "building=yes", almost always calls for pure
speculation. Whether it's a pool shed, cabana or outside dunny.
Ian.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 08:25, David Wales wrote:
> I think in this day and age, we can't really cons
Also take a look at http://satpredictor2.deere.com/lookup, found by
searching Google for "when is the best time for gps", which lead me to this
interesting set of StackOverflow answers:
https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/181/is-gps-more-accurate-on-specific-hours-of-the-day,
too.
On Wed, Jun
=no
note="blah"
because otherwise an armchair mapper will put it back (and I would too,
guilty as charged). It's ugly and non-standard, but I'd do it anyway.
Ian.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 22:52, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> I think you've done a top job detailing the situation, so I'd
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 15:38 Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 1:23 PM Nuno Caldeira
> wrote:
>
>> But what happens if the Foundation is taken over by people with
>> commercial interests?
>>
>>- You still own the rights to any data you contribute, not the
>>Foundation. In
any longer.
I'd go by the name on the sign - as these are likely to change over the
past few months as the Caltex owned stores all revert to form.
Ian.
On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 14:51, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:55 PM Charles Gregory
> wrote:
>
>&
I am OK for Worcestershire
Ian
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 11:46, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Mainly for west mids mappers but cross-posted to talkgb for a wider
> audience.
>
> For some time I've collaborated with TfWM who make extensive use of
> OpenStre
others seem to be proposing.
Secondly, we may end up with a wiki page with the areas and significant
features all laid out. Which may be counter to what we're trying to achieve
here.
Ian.
From: Sebastian S.
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aboriginal art sites
To: talk-au
in a public library, it may be sufficient to just have this as
a guideline to mappers, and just add a thin layer of obscurity that seems
sufficient to reduce the risk from the instagrammers, etc. If that's the
aim.
Ian.
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:39, Rory McCann wrote:
> On 01/04/2019 12:27,
guideline, and not be enforced?
It seems all a bit impractical to me. The information is out there.
is this form of censorship practised anywhere else in OSM - maybe for other
indigenous people - that we could copy their model?
Ian.
P.S. It's Strait - not "Straight".
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 15:14, Graem
Fabulous. Expect a few next week :-)
On 28/3/19 10:06 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Hi Ian, Absolutely, most importantly if anything is missing in OSM, then add it
in.
The walks database I use is open source at https://gitlab.com/beyondtracks/beyondtracks-walks you
can open a new issue
Andrew,
Can anyone contribute?? If so, can you advise the hows and whats please.
We are heading up to Weddin NP (near Grenfell, NSW) to do a few "stomps" and I always take my
GPSMap60CSX when we go.
Ian
On 28/3/19 7:56 am, Dion Moult wrote:
This site looks fantastic A
Thank you so much for hosting this again, Martijn!
The time sounds good to me.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You may remember that I hosted online ‘virtual mappy hours’ a few years
> ago.
>
> I thought it was nice and I want to resume them.
>
> Some
For now, for the commons around Malvern I will add landuse, In most cases
landuse=meadow.
Ian
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 at 12:54, Edward Catmur wrote:
> They're going to be retagged anyway to get them to render in the main map,
> so I doubt that's a solution.
>
> Any conclusion on how
In the last day or two the standard renderer as stop rendering common land
(leisure=common) see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311973831
Ian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I think your description of motels as parking directly outside rooms is
good, but I've seen plenty of motels that had multiple stories.
Wikipedia's page on motels is good and has this definition:
"a type of hotel consisting of a single building of connected rooms whose
doors faced a parking lot
I should be there
Ian
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 at 19:42, Br
Ian
Prangle wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> This Thursday 7 March is our scheduled date for our monthly meeting. I've
> checked that the Bull has re-opened so see you there at about 730
>
>
This is great, Mike! Thanks for sharing.
Did you happen to take any photos? It'd be fun to have you write up
something about how you found this data, set up the Tasking Manager
project, and did the work at the Mapathon for the OSM US blog.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Mike N wrote:
> Hi,
>
I agree there should be a better way, but I would solve this problem
by bring the road split to the east of the the intersection in this
case. The road divides on the eastern side of the intersection
anyway.
Then there will be no option but to continue straight.
Ian.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 09
Concur. Be ruthless. These people are akin to nuisance callers and should be
publicly flogged.
Ian
On 30/1/19 7:22 pm, nwastra wrote:
We seem to be getting a lot of business edits in this form lately with only a name and description
tag, often with address details or just spam
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 10:42 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This data is no less verifiable than national forest boundaries and
> federal wilderness boundaries; these generally need to be checked against
> official sources, just as BLM boundaries will.
>
> Municipal boundaries are perhaps even
other data that is a better fit to import into OSM:
address points and building footprints come to mind, for example.
-Ian
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:03 PM brad wrote:
> I'd like to import BLM (US Bureau of Land Management) boundaries into
> OSM.This is not an automated import as you can see
The bull is closed
Ian
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, 11:29 Rob Nickerson See you all there :-) I will bring the new hi Vis vest for you to see.
>
> Rob
>
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, 11:09 Brian Prangle
>> Me too!
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 10:03 PM Rob Nickerson
>> wrote
Hello and happy New Year to all.
In the wake of issues between OpenStreetMap contributors in Thailand and
editors from GlobalLogic [1] I've decided to review a selection of edits in the
Philippines done by the GlobalLogic team over the past 12 months.
As soon as I started my review, I
is in "emergency moderation" mode for the night.
-Ian
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:30 PM Nathan Mills wrote:
> The reason you don't get it is because you are not listening. Nobody has
> said the motorway tagging should continue through the intersection. The
> debate is e
> CDPs and retags relevant ones from boundary=administrative admin_level=8(or
> 7) to boundary=census, no admin_level=*.”
>
> Finally, there seem to be too many wiki pages covering this :) But that’s
> not unique for this topic.
>
> I guess we have some work to do!
>
> Martijn
1 - 100 di 1424 matches
Mail list logo
