In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Sorry, this thread was deadhorsed.
PH Point taken. One question if you don't mind: As I am reluctant to dig
PH through four years of history: will whitelisting html be implemented or
PH not.
PH I don't want to restart the duscussion, just need to know.
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 01:23:50 GMT +0100
DC Actually what we had talked about was a check box to completely disable
DC or enable that button, for those that want to turn the remote download
DC feature completely off.
Two
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 01:29:25 GMT +0100
DC You using Imad's version of PGP 6.5.8 by any chance?
No, it true blue Network Associates PGP that I've had since before the big
change over in ownership. Complete with PGPdisk
Hello The,
A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 05:06:07 GMT +0100
TFC Pocomail, incredimail, eurora, Express plus are all email
TFC clients that their programmers don't code browsers
TFC they all have great html supports too!
Poco is full of bugs, I
At 09:17 [GMT+] on Monday February 28 (actual time - 5:17pm on Monday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
DC Actually what we had talked about was a check box to completely disable
DC or enable that button, for those that want to turn the remote download
DC feature completely off.
Two
Hello Mic,
A reminder of what Mic Cullen on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 12:03:49 GMT +0100
MC It VERY clearly says 'check-box, not a button. As in something you set in
MC preferences, so it will do what you want all the time. (If it matches the
MC whitelist, or whatever. It's not
At 11:46 [GMT+] on Monday February 28 (actual time - 7:46pm on Monday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
MC It VERY clearly says 'check-box, not a button. As in something you set in
MC preferences, so it will do what you want all the time. (If it matches the
MC whitelist, or whatever.
Hello Mic,
A reminder of what Mic Cullen on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 12:55:09 GMT +0100
MC I'd like the 'X' checkbox as well, but, of course, that's not how windows
ran
MC HISTORICALLY, so it's a pretty dangerous option, being able to alter things
like
MC that nowadays.
So
At 12:01 [GMT+] on Monday February 28 (actual time - 8:01pm on Monday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
MC I'd like the 'X' checkbox as well, but, of course, that's not how windows
ran
MC HISTORICALLY, so it's a pretty dangerous option, being able to alter
things like
MC that
Hello Mic,
A reminder of what Mic Cullen on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 14:00:56 GMT +0100
MC When you snip the smilie it changes the context immensely, as I'm sure you
are
MC well aware.
Sorry, forgot you like pretty little pictures BIG SMILE HERE
--
Tony.
Using The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Tony Boom
On Monday, February 28, 2005, at 4:31:12 AM
You wrote:
TB Poco is full of bugs, I bought it.
TB Incredimail is adware/spyware, I bought it.
TB Express plus is very, very basic, I bought it.
TB Eudora is well, same as
Hello Leif,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:18:58 -0700 GMT (28/02/2005, 00:18 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
TF I thinnk most have left, because we don't even get replies to
TF http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001762
LG It's sad too. Just in the time that I wrote my
Hello Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:12:40 + GMT (28/02/2005, 01:12 +0700 GMT),
Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF Why not integrate, as an option, the IE engine into the TB? You don't
GF want to use it, fine, stick with internal render engine. People who
GF don't mind do as they want to.
The
Hello Mary,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:55:09 -0600 GMT (27/02/2005, 19:55 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
MB I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
MB my needs using TB!, or out there as potential users, and it would be
MB so simple to respect this need of mine by having
The Final Cut wrote:
Hello
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 5:03:35 PM
You wrote:
The reason other players have good HTML support is that these
other player also write browsers. They implement their browser into
their e-mail product. Do I have anything against TB writing their
own
Hello Leif,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:52:18 -0700 GMT (27/02/2005, 23:52 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
LG You've never heard of governors? They're on nearly every US military
LG vehicle. And many high performance vehicles have them in case you loan
LG your car to your kid. You put a key in, and
Tony Boom wrote:
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
28 February 2005 at 01:23:50 GMT +0100
DC Actually what we had talked about was a check box to completely disable
DC or enable that button, for those that want to turn the remote download
DC feature
Tony Boom wrote:
DC IMAP is really great if you need to access your mail on multiple
DC computers. It's like having 'webmail' features through your email
DC client. Multiple folders and everything stored on the remote server.
OK, OK, don't rub it in, I'm envious enough :)
Not too
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, February 28, 2005, 8:08 AM, you wrote:
MB I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
MB my needs using TB!, or out there as potential users, and it would be
MB so simple to respect this need of mine by having the capability OFF by
MB Default.
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:43:52 -0600 GMT (28/02/2005, 21:43 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
The whole discussion is about an option that will be OFF by default
anyway. ...
MB Some people don't want it OFF by Default
Well, I do. I just want the option to turn it on for manually
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, February 28, 2005, 9:05 AM, you wrote:
The whole discussion is about an option that will be OFF by default
anyway. ...
MB Some people don't want it OFF by Default
Well, I do. I just want the option to turn it on for manually
whitelisted sender addresses.
I know. I
Hello Goncalo,
On Sunday, February 27, 2005 you wrote:
Why not integrate, as an option, the IE engine into the TB? You don't
want to use it, fine, stick with internal render engine. People who
don't mind do as they want to.
No. This would be a security flaw, and would influence not
sábado, 26 feb 2005 at 18:55, it seems you wrote:
That would be fine with me. Even just a checkbox in the prefs to
enable/disable the button's fuctionality and include/remove it from the
toolbar would be fine with me. In fact, it's a very good idea to make
it inactive completely unless
Hello Leif,
A reminder of what Leif Gregory on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 02:10:08 GMT +0100
LG Happy Tony? Now you drug me into this!
I've bowed out of it as gracefully as I could now. No one came up with any
new convincing reasons for html so it got boring.
Anyway, I didn't
At 11:03 [GMT-0500] on Friday February 25 (actual time - 12:03am on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
A 1600x1200 picture reduced to 320x240 for viewing in a newsletter
will look worse than the same picture taken at 640x480. Why waste the
resources for an inferior product?
If
Hello Greg,
If development would not have ceased I would still be using VA today.
:-)
Because of the VA situation I moved on to TB for email, and use Agent
for newsgroups.
Why don't you use TB for newsgroups also? Works beautifully with MyGate.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
2/27/2005 6:19 AM
Hi Leif,
On 2/26/2005 Leif Gregory wrote:
LG Happy Tony? Now you drug me into this! :-)
Very well said!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA'
2/27/2005 6:29 AM
Hi Mic,
On 2/27/2005 Mic Cullen wrote:
MC If you have even a vague clue as to what you are doing, that statement is
MC utterly false.
My monitor only shows 96 dpi, what is yours?
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Hi Paul,
On 27/2/2005 6:21 AM, you wrote:
Very well said!
Yeah. A good technical argument rather than all the other
philosophical and hyped ones that I had seen until then.
OTOH, one wonders, why implement anything at all then if we look at it
in that depressingly unsurmountable all-or-none
Hello NetVicious!
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 2:55 AM, you wrote:
That would be fine with me. Even just a checkbox in the prefs to
enable/disable the button's fuctionality and include/remove it from the
toolbar would be fine with me. In fact, it's a very good idea to make
it inactive
2/27/2005 8:20 AM
Hi Mary,
On 2/27/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB This is so that I can protect myself from inadvertently putting a
MB graphics image into a message-text bodyin the View Folder window.
MB I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
MB my needs using TB!,
Hello Paul!
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 7:26 AM, you wrote:
MB Note, however, that I do not object to others accepting more risk than
MB I do. :)
Agreed. Gee-whiz functionality at the expense of privacy and security
is too high of a price for me to pay. I do object to others taking
risks
Hi Allie,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 07:07:44 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:07 AM where
I live) you wrote:
A Yeah. A good technical argument rather than all the other
A philosophical and hyped ones that I had seen until then.
Well, philosophically, I don't want it either! grin
A OTOH, one wonders, why
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
A Hi Paul,
A On 27/2/2005 6:21 AM, you wrote:
A At least not for the foreseeable future. Most clients with very
A good HTML mail displaying capabilities either use the IE rendering
A engine or are part of an established browser, i.e., Operamail or
A
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PVN Agreed. Gee-whiz functionality at the expense of privacy and
PVN security is too high of a price for me to pay. I do object to
PVN others taking risks if doing so has an impact on others.
PVN Irresponsibility begins as soon we
Hello Tony,
On Saturday, February 26, 2005 you wrote:
3 months time, The Bat has the best html engine of any email client
available... Still no working flawless IMAP ability but great comic book
features. Hands up all those who are going to be jumping for joy and hands
up all those are
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG If it's an e-mail function, then go for it. I'd just much rather
LG have RITLabs sink 200 hours into IMAP rather than HTML
LG functionality. IMAP belongs to e-mail, HTML doesn't.
It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up
Hi Greg,
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, at 22:09:57 [GMT -0600] (which was 9:09 PM where
I live) you wrote:
GS This thread is really about opinions. Everyone has one. :-)
Hey, you forgot to type out the rest of that saying! grin
GS This is a very important point which should not be lost in the
GS debate
Hi MAU,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 12:14:17 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:14 AM where
I live) you wrote:
M Why don't you use TB for newsgroups also? Works beautifully with
M MyGate.
And see! That's a plugin. I'd completely bow out of the HTML
resistance movement if HTML support was done completely by
Hi Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:07:07 [GMT +] (which was 7:07 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF If it's something you can switch on or off then you're in no more
GF danger than being alive.
GF I'm sure you manage to get a better justification!
Let's expound a bit on this though Goncalo.
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG Hi Goncalo,
LG On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:07:07 [GMT +] (which was 7:07 AM where
LG I live) you wrote:
GF I'm sure you manage to get a better justification!
LG Let's expound a bit on this though Goncalo. Why exactly is it that
LG IE is so
Hello Goncalo,
Sunday, February 27, 2005, 10:51:37 AM, you wrote:
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I disagree. It's vulnerable because MS was unable to anticipate the
misuse of the technology they were providing. Now they made it more
secure (not perfectly secure) without
Hi Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 15:51:37 [GMT +] (which was 8:51 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF I disagree. It's vulnerable because MS was unable to anticipate
GF the misuse of the technology they were providing. Now they made it
GF more secure (not perfectly secure) without cutting down
Hello Leif,
And see! That's a plugin. I'd completely bow out of the HTML
resistance movement if HTML support was done completely by plugin.
MyGate is not even a plugin, it's just a gateway. And as for HTML, I
will not enter into the discussion. If I receive an HTML e-mail and I
want to see it,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DH Firstly, speed limits in cars is a weak argument. People know their
DH cars can go faster, they don't often know where security exploits are
DH in any operating system. And, your retort about Microsoft not knowing
DH how their technology could be misused
Hi Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:15:19 [GMT +] (which was 7:15 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the
GF usage of email, they must go along with the major players and the
GF major players do have GOOD HTML support.
So if your
Hi Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 17:01:39 [GMT +] (which was 10:01 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF I really don't care about other users, I care about my needs and
GF if I can accomplish them with the software I'm using.
Exactly the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail. The
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:14:17 +0100 GMT(2/27/2005, 5:14 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAU wrote:
Because of the VA situation I moved on to TB for email, and use Agent
for newsgroups.
Why don't you use TB for newsgroups also? Works beautifully with MyGate.
Probably not
Hello Leif,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:03:03 -0700 GMT(2/27/2005, 11:03 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Leif Gregory wrote:
Cookidence...
--
Leif -:- TB Lists Moderator -:- PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Tagline of the day:
deja moo, the feeling that you've heard this bull before.
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 10:52:59 [GMT +0700] (which was 8:52 PM where
I live) you wrote:
TF I thinnk most have left, because we don't even get replies to
TF http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001762
It's sad too. Just in the time that I wrote my tutorial for
Hello Leif,
A reminder of what Leif Gregory on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 18:13:24 GMT +0100
LG Exactly the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail
Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
before they make any new additions, they want
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF the misuse of the technology they were providing. Now they made
GF it more secure (not perfectly secure) without cutting down the
GF functionality that people had.
LG Sure they did. MS hosts a page listing hundreds of applications
LG they broke by
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the
GF usage of email, they must go along with the major players and the
GF major players do have GOOD HTML support.
LG So if your friend jumps off a bridge, you're going to do it too?
No
Goncalo Farias wrote:
It's really easy then. They could provide us users a way to choose
between the HTML internal engine or the IE engine. That way, everyone
would be happy! :)
Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko (From
Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF I really don't care about other users, I care about my needs and
GF if I can accomplish them with the software I'm using.
LG Exactly the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail.
LG The completely selfish, me first attitude. Let the rest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Tony Boom
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 1:04:51 PM
You wrote:
TB Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
TB before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
TB everyone else.
Didnt you
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 18:19 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html
whitelist wish' :
Hallo Greg,
Cookidence...
Tagline of the day:
deja moo, the feeling that you've heard this bull before.
GS ROFLMAO!!!
Yeah! I stole that one immediately for my own taglinelist hehehe
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC Goncalo Farias wrote:
It's really easy then. They could provide us users a way to choose
between the HTML internal engine or the IE engine. That way, everyone
would be happy! :)
DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko
Hi Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 18:16:42 [GMT +] (which was 11:16 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF Isn't it exactly the same attitude you're exhibiting? Did anyone
GF mandate you to define what is allowable or not in email usage?
GF What feature can or cannot be included? What alternatives
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free
TB Bat before they make any new additions, they want html right now
TB and Sod everyone else.
TFC Didnt you say earlier in the threat that this feature has been
TFC requested for around
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 18:34 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html
whitelist wish' :
Hallo Greg,
GS Ok now you have me thinking. IIRC didn't you publish a quite lengthy
GS installation for the MyGate plugin or was it MailTraq?
GS If you used both which is better?
as always I'm
Hi David,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 13:15:41 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:15 AM where
I live) you wrote:
DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko
DC (From Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.
Immensely accurate observation.
--
Leif -:- TB Lists Moderator -:- PGP
Hi Goncalo,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 18:12:40 [GMT +] (which was 11:12 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF No comments. It doesn't apply.
Lemming analogy. If others do it, it must be ok. Perfectly applicable.
GF Yeah, right. With less then 2% of market share the last time I saw
GF some statistics
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Isn't it exactly the same attitude you're exhibiting? Did anyone
GF mandate you to define what is allowable or not in email usage?
GF What feature can or cannot be included? What alternatives to
GF current features can be implemented or not?
LG
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 19:48:59 GMT +0100
GF So, do me a favor, be part of the solution or else...
Oh dear, oh dear oh dear. Don't ya just love it when they get violent
because they're losing an argument :)
--
Tony.
Using
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Yeah, right. With less then 2% of market share the last time I
GF saw some statistics their must be very popular.
LG Yeah, Mozilla based browsers are sucking up some serious market
LG share.
Mozilla is not related to Opera, the example given by
Hello Greg,
MyGate is not even a plugin, it's just a gateway. And as for HTML, I
will not enter into the discussion.
Ok now you have me thinking. IIRC didn't you publish a quite lengthy
installation for the MyGate plugin or was it MailTraq?
If you used both which is better?
That was for
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 19:48:59 GMT +0100
GF So, do me a favor, be part of the solution or else...
TB Oh dear, oh dear oh dear. Don't ya just love it when they get violent
TB
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 20:05:59 GMT +0100
GF I said exactly what he said. If he wants to be part of the solution
GF fine, if not, please step aside...
You don't know who he is do you?
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 20:05:59 GMT +0100
GF I said exactly what he said. If he wants to be part of the solution
GF fine, if not, please step aside...
TB You don't know who
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 20:18:06 GMT +0100
GF Sure I do. He is the moderator. Did I said anything offensive? I
GF didn't call lemming to anyone, did I?
It's not the moderator part that you need to worry about. Why do
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Sure I do. He is the moderator. Did I said anything offensive? I
GF didn't call lemming to anyone, did I?
TB It's not the moderator part that you need to worry about. Why do
TB you think NO ONE else is arguing with him least of all me?
I'll bet you're
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 20:29:19 GMT +0100
GF I'll bet you're going to tell me...
You bet wrong. I'm not risking that, that's for sure. Now I think it best
we change the subject.
Winters nearly over, Australian Grand Prix
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:03:05 +0100 GMT(2/27/2005, 1:03 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAU wrote:
That was for MailTraq, much before MyGate was even developed. MyGate is
much more simple to install and configure and it just runs beautifully.
I switched from MailTraq to
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB You bet wrong. I'm not risking that, that's for sure. Now I think it best
TB we change the subject.
I don't know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
expressing our points of view.
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
73% of
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 20:40:38 GMT +0100
GF I don't know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
GF expressing our points of view.
Just so long as it doesn't differ from his too much you should be OK now
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF I don't know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
GF expressing our points of view.
TB Just so long as it doesn't differ from his too much you should be OK now
TB drop it will you *please*!
ahahahahaha...
--
Best regards,
Goncalo
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 20:53:00 GMT +0100
GF ahahahahaha...
You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
and I'm certainly not going to put them at risk for the sake of a html
argument, I'd
Tony Boom wrote:
Hello Leif,
Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
everyone else.
I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as I've said
before, I agree that bug fixes
Leif Gregory wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 13:15:41 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:15 AM where
I live) you wrote:
DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko
DC (From Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.
Immensely accurate observation.
None of us that want better HTML
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:02:53 GMT +0100
DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as I've said
DC before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.
I know, and you are right, html should be available for
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 20:53:00 GMT +0100
GF ahahahahaha...
TB You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
TB and I'm certainly not going to put
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC Tony Boom wrote:
Hello Leif,
Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
everyone else.
DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as
Tony Boom wrote:
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:02:53 GMT +0100
DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as I've said
DC before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.
I know, and you are right,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as I've
DC said before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.
TB I know, and you are right, html should be available for those that
TB want it. But can you see my point? Those of us that don't
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:18:50 GMT +0100
GF Old soldiers never die,
They just go on and on and on about the war :)
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Old soldiers never die,
TB They just go on and on and on about the war :)
Hmmm... I better start signing my emails! :)
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
Blessed our young they will inherit our national debt.
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:21:08 GMT +0100
GF I can't understand why. Isn't the check box to enable/disable enough?
In an ideal world yes, but you tick the box for one message and forget to
untick it, what happens then?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Tony Boom
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 3:01:31 PM
You wrote:
TB You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
TB and I'm certainly not going to put them at risk for the sake of a html
TB argument, I'd rather
Hello David,
A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:20:46 GMT +0100
DC Oh, I agree 100%. I certainly want better IMAP support and for some
DC fixes to be made to the GnuPG (not PGP) support
Not too long ago my host implemented IMAP. I've never used
Hello The!
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 2:43 PM, you wrote:
hahahaha I hope you are not serious!
Oh, but he is! You just haven't been around long enough to know Leif
the way Tony does!!
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello The,
A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:44:40 GMT +0100
TFC hahahaha I hope you are not serious!
Do you see me laughing?
Can you see his rouge image? That little boy he's just about to throw off
the cliff? I'm not risking that for the sake
Hello Mary,
A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:51:08 GMT +0100
MB Oh, but he is! You just haven't been around long enough to know Leif
MB the way Tony does!!
Best stay out of it Mary, you don't want to put yourself at risk.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat!
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello The,
TB A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 21:44:40 GMT +0100
TFC hahahaha I hope you are not serious!
TB Do you see me laughing?
TB Can you see his rouge image? That little boy he's just about to
Hello Mary,
A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 21:51:08 GMT +0100
MB Oh, but he is! You just haven't been around long enough to know Leif
MB the way Tony does!!
Tell you what Mary, Lief has been awfully quiet this past hour, hope he's
not arranging
Hello Goncalo,
A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 22:06:20 GMT +0100
GF ui ui ui estou a tremer cheio de medo!
Sorry, don't speak Klingon.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Hello Tony!
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 3:05 PM, you wrote:
Tell you what Mary, Lief has been awfully quiet this past hour, hope he's
not arranging anything.
Tony, The Name! shivering Quick, fix it! Before he notices that you
misspelled The Name!!
Now I really do think we should stop,
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 22:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html
whitelist wish' :
Hallo Tony,
GF ui ui ui estou a tremer cheio de medo!
TB Sorry, don't speak Klingon.
whahahahahaa.. :-))
--
regards,
Cees
Coming soon: Windows for Nintendo
Hello Mary,
A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 22:15:59 GMT +0100
MB and the sickening odor of Dead Horse
I know, and all that hassle of having to put clean bed linen on.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Hello Mary,
A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
27 February 2005 at 22:15:59 GMT +0100
MB rushes to :toilet:
Can't stop :rofl2:
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
