Hello, Ian.
Saturday, February 16, 2008, 12:02:31 AM, you wrote:
G'day Henk,
- On Saturday, February 16, 2008, 5:56:00 PM, you (Henk M. de Bruijn) wrote:
HMdB Can not confirm this, I only have 4.014.2 in that list.
That's odd because I do not have a MSI version of 4.0.14.2. The
latest MSI
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Correct, you can use 4.0 with your 3.x key. You only need a new key
for 4.1 and further - this might be confusing, but has been announced
several times.
Thanks, Thomas.
Because I have been using The Bat! very little since I switched to IMAP,
I don't read the lists as
Ian A. White wrote:
No, it is because in the Spell Checker|Options dialog I only see SSCE
and Hunspell.
I have the same problem. I don't know whether this is a new issue,
because I just discovered the Spell Checker Options. In any case, CSAPI
is not available in the options.
I have both
Hello Jens,
Thursday, January 17, 2008, 2:31:29 PM, you wrote:
Guten Tag Rick Grunwald,
am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 um 17:29 schrieben Sie:
My Download URL manager is getting loads of URLs that are
unresolved. There is no way to delete them
I have additionally the Problem, that there
Vilius Šumskas wrote:
Hello all,
I think that RIT guys did it again. I mean, a great job!
Yeah, you did *it* again RitLabs.
Can we have an IMAP fixes now?
AMEN!
Current beta is 4.0.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
4.1 will be a paid update for the users of v3, nothing extraordinary.
Just to clarify
Does this mean that the 4.0 series is *not* a paid upgrade?
I'm not ready to pay for an upgrade until TB is fully IMAP compliant and
handles IMAP as well as Thunderbird. At the
Thanks, Henk.
That explains why I couldn't find the messages on the list. :-)
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
I asked this on October 18th. What a pity that next to the news about
update policy of 11/7/2007 and the license policy of 11/19/2207 there
is no communication with tbbeta about what is next :-(
Can you post what appeared in these two messages? I don't seem to be
Hi, Bob.
You wrote:
Try this link:
http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/information/zass/releaseHistory.html
That link is for ZoneAlarm Internet Security, which I have.
Here is the link for ZoneAlarm Pro:
http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/information/zap/releaseHistory.html
Thanks.
Bob Riley wrote:
And MAU was correct! On a hunch, I removed BitDefender AV Plus 10
and reverted to ZoneAlarm Internet Security 2006 (version 6.5, with
CA's AV component and then, within a day, the free upgrade to version
7, with Kaspersky AV).
Bob, how do I do that? I wasn't aware of
Never mind. I'd missed the link at the end of the update instructions
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.96.04 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this
Vili wrote:
Hello tbbeta,
I got an email from S. Korea.
Vili,
I just saw your message. Unfortunately, The Bat! still does not handle
Korean encodings, including EUC. I posted to TBUDL on the same topic
just the other day. See the thread with subject Is Anyone Able to Send
Korean Email?
--
Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
On Sunday, April 2, 2006, at 10:00:11 [UTC+0200] (Sunday, April 2, 2006
10:00 my local time) Martin Schoch wrote:
What's about the development of Voyager? Or did I miss something?
See my signature - this version is on RITLabs site.
Okay...Can someone help me
Roelof Otten wrote:
The master password is what you've used as encryption key during the
install of Voyager.
Thanks, Roelof (he says, sheepishly). I had my usual blinders on,
I guess.
As I recall, when Voyager was first installed, there was a prompt
that came up that required the entry of
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Monday, January 23, 2006 at 18:40:34GMT -0500 (which was 4:40
PM where I live) Curtis wrote and made these points on the
subject of The Bat! 3.70.02 Qigong is now available:
If I leave messages in my Inbox, exit TB! and then use another client to
delete them, TB!
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
Having read the postive posts with respect to 3.63.14's IMAP
performance, I went to the beta site to download it. I discovered
that 3.63.15 had been added to the page.
I decided to live dangerously and downloaded and installed the
untested beta. So far, things are
I wrote:
I also can confirm this problem. While TB! has always been slower
updating than my other clients, it became much worse just a few betas ago.
Unfortunately, following the advice to downgrade to 3.60.1 didn't help
me.
I should say, too, that like Curtis, I am using FastMail. I'm
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
GS On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:16 -0500 GMT(9/24/2005, 7:20 AM -0500 GMT),
GS per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I think I will try to download 3.60.1 if it is
still available, if not does anyone have it still?
GS It is still at
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 14:11:17GMT +0300 (which was
5:11 AM where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote and made these points
on the subject of 3.60 MSIs:
Could you please try 3.60 MSIs:
I just got around to testing this. It worked fine for me, too,
with the
Hello, Alexey.
On Wednesday, August 24, 2005, 5:14:18 PM, you wrote:
All letters will dissapear. But even if you then clean up the search field
and
move from folder to folder, no letters will reappeared (see animated .gif
attached).
Confirmed
--
Keith Russell
...Mediocrity requires
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
I have my fingers crossed. :-)
A couple of weeks ago, I decided to try a supposedly stable TB!
release. After a couple of hours of fighting it, I intended to
post the details of my latest disappointing episode, but never
got around to it.
Then, a couple of days ago, I
seen a post from any of the programmers saying
what they did with IMAP in this beta, but the difference is
impressive. It's still not where I'd like to see it, but it is
USABLE. (I didn't ever install 3.60.01, so I have no comparison
to post.)
I just hope I'm not speaking too soon...
--
Keith
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
Can anyone tell me what happened to Edit Shortcuts? I've had so
many problems over the past few months that I've never gotten to
the shortcuts, and now I cant find them anywhere in the menus.
--
Keith
Using The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build
Sorry about the duplicate post. It appears there are still some
glitches to be ironed out
I wrote the message, then minimized it (or so I thought), and
after working in the main window for a minute, looked for my edit
window, and it was gone. I couldn't find it anywhere: not in
Outbox, not in
Hello, Stuart.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2005, 1:57:37 AM, you wrote:
I can't get to it?
It was up earlier, but does seem to be inaccessible now
--
Keith
...Oxymoron: Still Life.
Using The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a
2.4 GHZ Pentium IV with 512 MB.
differently it
performs for different users, and how dramatically different are
the consequences of any changes.
--
Keith Russell
...Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!
Using The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a
2.4 GHZ Pentium IV with 512 MB
this.
2. Where do I find the shortcuts for expanding and collapsing
threads? I don't see them anywhere!
--
Keith Russell
. Bugs come in through open Windows.
Using The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a
2.4 GHZ Pentium IV with 512 MB
Hello, Curtis.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2005, 4:45:52 AM, you wrote:
It likely was never sent and hence the absence of the duplicate.
But it was there later
So I typed the message in again and hit Send. Several minutes later,
as far as I could tell, neither message existed. Eventually, of
Hello, Marck.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2005, 12:31:52 PM, you wrote:
KR 2. Where do I find the shortcuts for expanding and collapsing
KR threads? I don't see them anywhere!
These are as they ever were - Ctrl-Num+, Ctrl-Num-,
Ctrl-Num*
And what if I wanted to change them?
--
Keith Russell
Hello, Clive.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2005, 12:28:26 AM, you wrote:
I was on the verge of uninstalling TB! from my machines and
concentrating on Mulberry, which I find suits my needs very well. I
might just delay that for a little while though.
So how's TB! working for you now, with 3.60.02?
a reduction in performance with 3.60.02?
Is this still a problem for some?
--
Keith Russell
...Modern man is the missing link between apes and human beings.
Using The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a
2.4 GHZ Pentium IV with 512 MB
to wait until (if?) I'm able to get this one
resolved. :-(
--
Keith Russell
...Give instruction to a wise man and he will be yet wiser.
Using The Bat! 3.51.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a 2.4
GHZ Pentium IV with 512 MB.
Current
Well, after I posted a few minutes ago, I started up The Bat!
again, and this time, quickly switched away from Inbox to a
different folder as soon as possible. I navigated around to
several folders before going back to Inbox.
It's now been several minutes, and no error messages. So what
Thanks, everyone, for your replies. Sorry to be so slow to
respond. I was actually able to complete the installation last
night, but forgot to post to this thread with that information,
and was busy this morning.
In any case, the thread has turned out to be very educational. I
will know in the
Hi, all.
Here I am again, ready for another try...and I can't get the
program to install!
I am installing over a very old beta version (didn't write down
the beta version and now I can't run the program). Before
starting the installation I renamed the installation folder from
TheBat to The
Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
Since you are a IMAP user I would strongly recommend to update to the newest
beta version. Really, you *must* do this. ;-)
Okay, so I think I have my problem fixed.
What is the latest stable, safe version I should install to start
testing again? I see some worrisome
Hi, Val.
Thanks very much for the quick reply.
9Val wrote:
Hello Keith,
KR I have tried clicking Yes and repairing the file, but it doesn't
KR help. Every few seconds, this message pops up, making it
KR impossible to work.
You'd better to find out which IMAP mailbox it is
Hi, everyone.
I'm still on version 3.0.9.13. One reason that I have never
upgraded this version and completely stopped using The Bat! some
time ago is that it is unusable due to a constantly recurring
error message.
No matter which account I'm working in, one IMAP account
continues to
Clive Taylor wrote:
Well, as a sample of one, I've given up on TB.
I just went through the last few days of IMAP posts, and it looks
like there might actually be six or seven of us still around
IMAP operation is a
disaster - and the prog seems to be going backwards in this area. It's
so
Well, I'm back to posting using Thunderbird again. :-(
I haven't seen the message I posted earlier using The Bat!, so I
don't know if there was a problem with it. In any case, more
serious problems have since developed.
I had such high hopes yesterday. After several months of cold
feet, I
Looks like my message got lost in the flurry of excitement about .15.
Can anyone help me with this, or are there any IMAP users left
here? Has everyone, including Allie, abandoned ship?
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.0.9.15 Return | 'Using
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Steve Lamb mode
/SL mode
ROTFL!!!
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.0.9.13 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first
Leif Gregory wrote:
LOL!!! I didn't think there were too many people here who still
remembered him.
Beat me to it, Leif. I was reading the old thread, and with your
changed subject didn't see your reply before I posted.
I think it would be pretty hard for anyone who was around with
Steve to
Greg Strong wrote:
Respect
I believe that would be WITH Respect. :-)
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link
On August 9, 2003, I wrote:
I wrote:
I'm now unable to access my messages using TB. No matter which
folder I click on, I'm connected to the server, then immediately
get the error message, IMAP - Server closed connection.
Am I the only one with this problem?
9val said he had found what was causing
Hi, everyone.
I hope someone can help me, because this is driving me crazy.
I just changed my email provider. I have an IMAP account with my
former ISP set up in The Bat!, but I can no longer log in.
I downloaded all the messages from the server while the account
was still active, and I want to
Clarification: I just timed it, and I'm getting the login dialog
every minute, exactly.
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta
Thomas Martin wrote:
Somebody else has the possibility to invite me for a Gmail account?
Thanks in advance.
Email me privately if you still need one, and I'll be happy to
help you out.
I have several, if anyone else needs one.
--
Keith
Stefan Dorscht wrote:
Did you send already an invitation to Thomas Martin?
No, I didn't, but it looks like you did. :-)
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Peter Hampf wrote:
or, if he can't wait it, try ebay and search for 'gmail'. You can get it
there for a few cents.
There are also some sites where you can get them for free.
However, we have enough Gmail users here that I think anyone
should have no trouble getting one here. There aren't as
on the server and not the difference
between server and cached count - doing away with * and n
I'm confused by this one. What does the * mean, anyway, and
what is the difference between server and cached count?
Thanks for the reply!
--
Keith
--
Keith Russell
...10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0
Clive Taylor wrote:
Do you copy your messages to local folders? If so, how?
I don't copy them all - after all, it's one of the advantages of IMAP
that you can access all your mail all the time.
Of course. That's the very reason I switched to IMAP. I guess I
didn't make myself clear, though. Even
Clive Taylor wrote:
I'm concerned about running into bandwidth problems, at least with
Fastmail.
You shouldn't be. A full account with FastMail gives you 600Mb of
storage while an enhanced a/c gives 2Gb.
I was referring to bandwidth, not storage space. Even an enhanced
membership allows just 1
By the way, I also have Gmail accounts to give away. :-)
--
Keith
Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
Michael Acklin wrote:
These I-[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message
text
Could -[ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes
Not Find -[ ] Use precise counters (needs fast connection)
Like Michael and Bernd, I wasn't able to find these, either. I
had a little
Clive Taylor wrote:
Keith, My two IMAP servers are FastMail and MailSnare, and there's no
doubt that Mailsnare is the slower of the two here using TB but that
might be because its message base is bigger than FastMail's.
However, I don't notice the difference between the two accessing them
via
On Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 5:30:45 AM, you wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2004 at 10:27:00 PM [GMT -0500], Keith
Russell
wrote:
...
I have a suspicion that if you create a folder on the server
called
Sent and use that instead, you'll be Ok. TB! may have a problem
reading that folder
Hi, Raymund.
Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
Looking at the messy quoting I'm glad staying with TB! :-)
:-) Yes, that is one thing TB! does do better.
Of course. I meant to mention that, but forgot. I understand that
performance will not be as good with IMAP as with POP3.
I can't see why it should be
Allie Martin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2004, at 02:41 AM, Keith Russell
wrote:
I thought I had sent this off an hour ago, and I just discovered
SEVENTEEN copies in my Outbox! How did that happen?!!!
Seems that you have your Outbox server side. I'd make that local, unless
you depend a lot
Allie Martin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2004, at 02:32 PM, Martin Webster
wrote:
Following Allie's lead I have played around with the various settings
and come up with optimum settings for my server. Perhaps we should
start sharing this information, get confirmations etc. so Ritlabs can
have
Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
This is normally connected to moving messages from one folder
to another. If you delete the cache everything is fine again. I move
message from my Inbox to a common folder and if I then copy/move a
message from another folder to my Inbox it doesn't show up at all or
it
Clive Taylor wrote:
Rather than echo all of what Allie has said in his reply I can confirm
that (unlike Allie) I can't rely on TB for everyday, real-world IMAP
use. It's just so frustrating to wait for a couple of minutes for
messages to display while TB churns away. I can see my router working
so
Martin Webster wrote:
Keith Russell [KR], wrote:
KR Now, however, I can confirm others' reports of random long pauses
KR when downloading message bodies. Like Clive, this has
KR always been a problem for me. As I reported previously, I see
KR similar, but even longer pauses (sometimes) when moving
broken
into two threads, the twelve messages (good and bad) are now
displayed in seven threads! Anybody know what might have caused
this?
I'll be anxiously waiting to hear from the IMAP experts! ;-)
--
Keith Russell
...Scotty, beam us aboard. Aye, sir. Will a 2x4 do?
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.4
, this reply will be sent
using Mulberry.
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 9:56:09 PM, you wrote:
On Sunday, October 31, 2004 at 11:49:01 PM [GMT -0500], Keith
Russell
wrote:
Someone (Allie, I
think) suggested that they might be due to the large number of
messages I have on the server. This seemed
Hi, Clive.
--On Monday, October 11, 2004 3:54 PM +0100 Clive Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've crossed this bridge, Keith. Although I miss some of TB's
features, rock-solid, fast IMAP performance is more important to me
for my domain mail and I don't regret a penny I spent on a licence for
Hi, Oliver.
Olivier Mascia wrote:
Is there some central wish-list about TB IMAP features somewhere ? I'd
like to read it and probably add some input.
Peter recently started a thread on this topic at:
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
I found your discussion of POP3/IMAP clients highly interesting
One thing that I do notice is that TB! is constantly updating the
Unread and Total numbers in my folder list. I do have a lot of
messages (over 63,000) and a lot of folders, but I don't
understand why the numbers would even need to be updated when all
my folders are set to Don't synchronize.
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
This I would like to see using POP3 as well. I would like to be able
to create custom flags for messages, much like colour groups but with
the possibility to assign more then one colour group to each message.
I agree. Thunderbird and Mulberry do not allow more than one
MANY others have posted their thoughts, most of which I agree
with. To be specific:
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
- completely new filtering system, easier to understand and better to manage;
Maybe, but I haven't dared to use it, reading of its many
problems--especially with IMAP. Is it fixed in 3.0? I'll
I wrote:
I'm now unable to access my messages using TB. No matter which
folder I click on, I'm connected to the server, then immediately
get the error message, IMAP - Server closed connection.
Am I the only one with this problem?
9val said he had found what was causing it, but I just installed
headers I can see are still in their original locations
(at least the ones I didn't move using TB).
Can anyone tell me how I can get things working again?
--
Keith Russell
...If all goes well, you've overlooked something!
Using The Bat! 2.12.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a 2.4 GHZ Pentium
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I don't know why TB isn't working with SSL, or why it would have
been working with 2.11.03 and not 2.11.04 or 2.12 Beta/1.
We are eager to fix that. Just give us the addresses of such servers.
If there are already registered reposts at the www.ritlabs.com/bt,
please also let
Allie Martin wrote:
Is ThunderBird working fine using SSL?
Yes, it is
--
Keith
Current beta is 2.12 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this
So...Yuki, what will you use that is competitive and fully
supports DBCS?
I've been waiting a long time, too. :-(
P.S. Feel free to reply to me off list
Current beta is 2.11 Beta/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hi, Jonathan.
Well, I've tried everything I can think of, and things still aren't making
sense. See below
--On Sunday, December 07, 2003 11:58 PM -0600 Jonathan Angliss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to find out if it is really a MailSnare issue, or a TB
issue, you could do it all
Thanks, Alexander. I'd missed this option. See below.
--On Monday, December 08, 2003 11:53 AM +0500 Alexander Leschinsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in _my_ imap-bugs hunting I prefer TB logs:
thebat.exe /IMAPTRACEfilename, which works for any connection type,
BTW
Partial results:
Thanks, Jonathan.
Finally, some progress!
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:06 PM -0600 Jonathan Angliss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LSUB returns only your subscribed folders. In this case, INBOX isn't
in that list, I wonder if TB is having some kind of hang up over that?
Try doing this:
#
Hi again 8-).
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:08 PM -0600 Jonathan Angliss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks as though The Bat at least knows about my subscribed folders.
Why doesn't it display them for me?
INBOX isn't subscribed. However INBOX is a required box according to
the RFCS (it's
Hi again, Gary.
--On Sunday, December 07, 2003 1:38 AM -0600 Gary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try Account properties / mail management / and put in INBOX in the root
folder section.. then restart TB!... You should then see it when you
right click on the main folder and manage IMAP folders
Well...
out to your ISP..
Okay, so what if I already have a Bayesian filter sitting between TB
and the server at 127.0.0.1. How would you suggest I set up Xray?
--
Keith Russell
...Winning isn't everything - but losing SUCKS!
Using The Bat! 2.01 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a 2.4 GHZ Pentium IV
Hello, Gary.
On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 8:09:53 AM, you wrote:
K Okay, so what if I already have a Bayesian filter sitting between TB
K and the server at 127.0.0.1. How would you suggest I set up Xray?
You could try putting Bayes on 127.0.0.2 and Xray on 127.0.0.1 and see if
that works ...
Hello, Marcus.
Okay, so what if I already have a Bayesian filter sitting between TB
and the server at 127.0.0.1. How would you suggest I set up Xray?
The bayesian filter works on port 110, used by POP3. XRay works on port
25 for SMTP. No problem using them both at the same time.
Actually,
Hello, Thomas.
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, 9:55:37 AM, you wrote:
due to the internet
speed I get in Thailand, IMAP is impractical for me.
Thomas, since when have you been in Thailand? Weren't you in Taiwan?
Any contact with tracer over there?
--
Keith Russell
Hi, Allie.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:56:16 -0500 GMT your local time, which was
Monday, June 09, 2003, 5:56 PM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
Keith Russell, [KR] wrote:
KR I'm running beta 9, but for some time now, a large number of message
KR in this list display like this. This one appears
Hi, Yuki.
On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, 5:20:10 PM, you wrote:
Does anyone know the status, if any, of full DBCS support for TB?
(And BTW, what good, if any, is the Shift-JIS addition to the
character sets, since selecting it does not allow me to view *any*
Japanese properly, nor of course,
Hi, Marck.
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:07:10 +0100 GMT your local time, which was
Wednesday, October 23, 2002, 5:07 PM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
You may see little evidence, but I'd suggest that's what you get for
not looking closely enough ;-) (joking - no offence intended).
Understood 8-). And
Okay, Syafril, what is KMail? 8-)
--
Keith
...You can name your salary here. I call mine Fred.
_
Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes:
Hi, Joseph.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:48:03 -0500 GMT your local time, which was
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 4:48 PM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
I've noticed the same thing. Separated msgs with overlapping
references. Pls post your findings if you come up with anything.
Me, too! Single threads
Hello, Chris.
On Wed, 1 May 2002 17:50:22 +0100 GMT your local time, which was
Wednesday, May 01, 2002, 10:50 AM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
I have successfully filtered on this character set, and so far only
gibberish messages have been put in the junk folder. I have not lost a
single none
:)
You make it sound easy ;-).
--
Keith Russell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...Half the lies they tell me aren't true. --Yogi Berra
--
_
Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe
expensive.
--
Keith Russell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...No good deed goes unpunished - Clare Booth Luce
--
_
Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish
by beta
testers who do know the languages.
--
Keith Russell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
--
_
Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
attention were paid to these three key issues, they could be
resolved and time then spent on what users really need. I like a lot
of the new features as much as anybody, but many, many posters here
have expressed frustration with the way the decisions often seem to
be made.
--
Keith
in the message using the source view, that should be
displayed normally.
Yes, it's strange. The body of the message contains text, but it's
text from the preceding message.
--
Keith Russell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...In case of fire, yell FIRE
? Thanks.
And that makes at least three of us
I second the motion.
--
Keith Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...We were unanimous - in fact everyone was unanimous.
Using The Bat! 1.48d under Windows 98 4.90 Build 3000 on a Pentium II 233 with 64 MB
exposure
to reply counters was when I started using TB and they started
showing up in all my replies. One of my first questions, as with
many other new users, was "How do I turn this *$#! 'feature' off?"
--
Keith Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...Reduce Carbon Dioxide emmissi
Hello, Tony.
On Sunday, September 17, 2000, 3:01:54 AM, you wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Thank you very much for the reply. And also to Keith for his in
depth explanation.
You're certainly welcome.
A reminder of what Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
17 September 2000 at
Hello, Tony.
On Sunday, September 17, 2000, 5:06:12 AM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
A reminder of what Chris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
17 September 2000 at 11:01:34 GMT +0200
C Hm, AFAIK there's a registry value which is checked:
C HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Clients\Mail\The
C
99 matches
Mail list logo
