Hello Steve!
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 3:59 PM, you wrote:
>> Would View/Display/Only unread messages do what you're looking for?
> Not really as it hides the threads completely!
Okay. I thread by None/Received time and read (compulsively) all the
mailing list messages chronologically.
I don't
Hello Steve!
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 12:48 PM, you wrote:
> That was the one. %Quotes.
Our pleasure. I have some with regular expressions in them, among my
Address Book entry templates, that Marck made and supplied me with.
But you can probably do that for yourself in Tools/Address
Book/(highl
Hello Steve!
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 10:51 AM, you wrote:
> I am sitting on the message, highlighted the text to be quoted,
> pressed f4 (or shift reply) and all it does is open a new message
> window prepopulated with an email address and subject.
Steve, it's quite possible that the old pros w
Hello Steve!
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 10:51 AM, you wrote:
> Not on my Pro version it doesn't.
> I am sitting on the message, highlighted the text to be quoted,
> pressed f4 (or shift reply) and all it does is open a new message
> window prepopulated with an email address and subject.
Are you u
Hello Chris!
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 7:36 AM, you wrote:
>> Which reminds me The Bat! folks - when we have highlighted some text
>> in a READ message why not provide a button on the SEND message that
>> pastes any highlighted text in as a quote? (Another VA feature I am
>> missing).
> F4 works,
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 9:46 PM, you wrote:
SC>> Can someone answer a couple of questions about attachments.
> Thanks Mary, Dwight and Thomas. Food for thought, although it looks to
> me like I will stay as I am.
It's possible that I will change, having read Thomas's thoughtfu
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 1:36 PM, you wrote:
> Can someone answer a couple of questions about attachments.
I will try, for the few that I know the answer to.
> I currently keep my attachments with my messages, but have been
> contemplating the idea of keeping them
Hello Cory!
On Wednesday, March 09, 2005, 4:05 AM, you wrote:
> Moving to v3 depends on your requirements, I'd say. For professional
> use I see no gain in smiley and rogue support, and a fancy inteface
> where large, shaded buttons take up more precious space... :-\
I think the New Filter Syste
Hello Thomas!
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 9:08 AM, you wrote:
> You are right about this, but there is a features request out there
> wishing for an option to "store sent messages in the folder that is
> active when message is created" or something like that. This would
> improve usability.
Hello WilWilWil!
On Friday, February 25, 2005, 5:21 PM, you wrote:
> It would be perfect. If I send a mail to friend named "A" from
> his folder I've set, I do not need to move the sent mail to his
> folder. TB do it for me.
In your Account/Sorting Office-Filters/file drop-down-menu, choose
Crea
Hello David!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 10:48 AM, you wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
>>> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB>> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they
Hello Mary!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 6:47 AM, you wrote:
>> It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm
>> off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to
>> take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I
>> want to do it well. .
Hello Richard!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 2:34 AM, you wrote:
> It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm
> off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to
> take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I
> want to do it well. .
Y
Hello Allie!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 5:48 AM, you wrote:
>> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
>> attachment, I would become quite wary.
> Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send
> fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot conce
Hello Greg!
On Saturday, February 05, 2005, 9:45 PM, you wrote:
MDP>>> That's one. There are others. Downloading *anything* at the behest of
MDP>>> an *email* is fundamentally a security breach - it's not the way email
MDP>>> is supposed to work.
>> ..."was" supposed to work, I'd say. Welcome to
Hello David!
On Saturday, February 05, 2005, 9:11 PM, you wrote:
M>> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M>> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me a
Hello Greg!
On Saturday, February 05, 2005, 5:19 PM, you wrote, in part:
> Now having said that I will also state I'm a text based email advocate
> because I do understand that HTML email increases risk. I read all email
> in plain text. I don't know of any statistics on TB users, but would
> ten
Hello Geoff!
On Sunday, January 16, 2005, 10:08 AM, you wrote:
> Of course, I shall stay with v 1.62 if v 3 doesn't meet my
> expectations, which is why I want to be sure I have a reversion path.
Thank you so very much for answering me at length as to your reasons
for wanting to try a trial upgr
Hello Geoff!
On Sunday, January 16, 2005, 8:42 AM, you wrote:
> I suspect the best way to do the trial would be to find a "throwaway"
> freebie mail account that allowed POP3 access and sign up that account
> to a mailing list or two ... unless someone else can think of a better
> idea?
I'm wond
Hello Lawrence!
On Saturday, January 15, 2005, 1:55 PM, you wrote:
> Thanks, Mary! That was it.
> I had the "Use an existing Dial-up connection (if any)" set. I added
> the "No automatical dial for periodical checking" (sic) and that fixed
> it. In moving TB! to the new WINXP system, I probab
Hello Lawrence!
On Saturday, January 15, 2005, 11:48 AM, you wrote:
> I just migrated from Windows 98SE to Windows XP and I'm finding an
> oddness in Dial Up Networking. I have the Internet Options set to
> "Never dial a connection", just as I did in Windows 98. However, I'm
> finding that The
Hello Arie!
On Saturday, January 15, 2005, 7:56 AM, you wrote:
> how can I clear the history for the "to" field when creating a message?
> I can't find it anywere
I'm not sure what you want to do.
However, in Help/Help Topics/Index/Find I typed in the word "history"
and found two topics to disp
Hello Anselm!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 10:55 AM, you wrote:
> It seems, then, that the answer is this:
>>> On the other hand, it may be that it's not possible to do what you
>>> want.
> Which is a real drawback in an otherwise very good mail program ( the
> only other substantial drawback w
Hello Andrew!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 10:27 AM, you wrote:
>> Nothing. Its a long standing bug. Very annoying.
>> See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1807
>> ...submitted October 2003 *sigh*
> That's a shame.
Here's a quote from a supporting note in October, 2004:
==
Hello Mary and Anselm!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
> In your address book Reply templates, are you using macros that quote
> the entire text you are replying to?
I got to thinking about possible macros and looked at the full
alphabetical list in Help/Help Topics/Index.
I fo
Hello Anselm!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 8:56 AM, you wrote:
> ... I can create HTML mails from the scratch, but when I reply to a
> mail, the reply defaults to Text only. When I toggle back to HTML,
> the HTML formatting of the original mail is lost. What am I doing
> wrong?
I have never had
Hello Ralph!
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:49 AM, you wrote:
> Thanx for your help, but i already found the problem: it seems automatic spell
> checking, doesn't work with the windows editor - only with microed...
Ah. Well spotted, that, on your part! I never use anything but Microed
and so
Hello Ralph!
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:16 AM, you wrote:
>> Why don't you try the Shortcut (Control plus F4) and see if it kicks
>> in?
>> Your Bat is definitely missing something on the Spell Checker menu!
> I can't complain about manual spell checking (F4 works fine), but
> as you say
Hello Ralph!
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:00 AM, you wrote:
> Sorry, but i can't find anything like "Automatic Checking". I
> posted a screenshot with the available menu entries here:
> http://www.inselsbacher.at/pics/spellchecking.png
I see your difficulty, on the screenshot. My menu has "
Hello Marek!
On Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 8:25 AM, you wrote:
> I am using it for registering The Bat! licences and in past, I had
> some forms for secure communication with a friends. Actualy, I am
> using SF for registrations only.
I see. Thanks for your prompt answer. :)
--
Best regards,
M
Hello Everyone!
Has anyone here ever used Submission Forms as supplied by The Bat!?
They are described in Main Window/Help/Index/Submission Forms. I would
be interested to know whether anyone has ever used this feature.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, January 07, 2005, 9:58 AM, you wrote:
> MB> I think perhaps Thomas may have thought he was Replying to Andrew.
> MB> Andrew said that his company selected a different e-mail client, right
> Ah, my mistake. Thanks for clarifying. Still not used to The Bat
> threading over
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, January 06, 2005, 11:56 AM, you wrote:
> TF> Good point. By the way, can you advise the email address of the email
> TF> client's vendor that you are using instead, which will get you more or
> TF> less immediate replies? Just curious.
> Sorry, I must be having a really
Hello Andrew!
On Thursday, January 06, 2005, 8:00 AM, you wrote:
>> I'm really Off-Topic Big Time with this thread.
>> If you're not subscribed to TBOT, why don't you do that, Andrew? We
>> are discussing my Today's Adventure over there. :)
< snip >
> Not to be that much an idiot, but I will be
Hello Andrew!
On Thursday, January 06, 2005, 7:33 AM, you wrote:
> How to Secure (and Keep Secure) My (New) Computer(s): A Layered Approach:
> http://www.broadbandreports.com/faq/8463
Thanks.
> On the, whole if you haven't got a firewall in place, take care of
> that first before connecting to
Hello Marck!
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005, 10:10 PM, you wrote, in part:
> 2) (the proper way to stop this happening ever again) throw away that
> nanny of a piece of interfering anti-virus software and install AVG or
> NOD or something like. One that won't interfere with the normal
> operation
Hello Leif!
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005, 2:25 PM, you wrote:
> M> As I'm sure all of my fellow listers will concur. And possibly even
> M> view my last statement above as the understatement of the year!!
> Well, here you go Mary...
> :award-understatement:
Okay, so I guess it is safe to giv
Hello Andrew!
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005, 1:50 PM, you wrote:
>> Keep the faith, Andrew! :42:
> I'll try
> Feynman had a way about him though, didn't he? Probably impossible
> to deal with in person, but no one said geniuses had to be polite!
The titles of two of his most popular books
Hello Andrew!
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005, 1:08 PM, you wrote:
Andrew's Cookidence Tag Line:
> For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over
> public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.
> --Richard Feynman (1918 - 1988)
Wow, don't you just absolutely love Richard Feynma
Hello Andrew!
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005, 12:16 PM, you wrote:
> Ritlabs could have benefited from [the corporation's crisis due to
> poor anti-virus protection], and I'm sure from others who have
> realized the same--30 bucks a seat is a small price to pay for
> continued productivity, but o
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, December 30, 2004, 7:00 AM, you wrote:
>>> It doesn't matter for The Bat!, because she is
> ASK> Hey, your Bat is a... femail? :-)
> Of course, she is. So many good things hidden beneath the pretty
> surface, that you will only find when you seriously begin to discover
Hello Susanne!
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 2:32 AM, you wrote:
> I am currently running version 2.02.3 CE, and am wondering
> which version I can upgrade to for free (can't find that
> info on the ritlabs website).
Susanne, you had a good reply from Gerard. The latest you can upgrade
to for f
Hello B!
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 7:29 AM, you wrote:
> Any news of Christmas Edition release???
Last I saw on tbbeta, the developers were "hoping" for a January
release--with luck in time for the Moldavian "Old Christmas," which is
celebrated January 6-7.
--
Best regards,
Mary
:Trill:
Th
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 6:24 AM, you wrote:
>> :) But at least Google has not parsed your text, which you sent as an
>> innocent bystander, non-Gmail-member.
>> Small comfort, I guess.
> Unless the location of the archive is a Gmail account.
:woe: There *is* that!
No way
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 5:00 AM, you wrote:
>> So, those who use *gmail* for *private* correspondence may simply use
>> crypto, and no fuss no problem. Isn't that obvious?
> And the recipient then archives a plaintext version to facilitate
> text searches...
:) But at least Go
Hello Andreas!
On Friday, December 24, 2004, 6:01 AM, you wrote:
> How can I do that via template?
> Is it enough to include %SIGNCOMPLETE in my message template?
Yes. That's all you need, if you have OpenPGP enabled in
Account/Properties/Options (main window).
I just added it to my Reply and
Hello Allie!
On Friday, December 24, 2004, 5:30 AM, you wrote:
>>> Practice good e-mail security and you won't see them.
>> Allie, what do you mean?
> If you PGP/MIME or S/MIME sign your messages to TBOT, the ads will not
> appear as footers.
Ah! Okay, thanks a mil!! I shall put that into my T
Hello Allie!
On Friday, December 24, 2004, 5:18 AM, you wrote:
>> Take a look at the adverts you get tagged onto the bottom of TBOT
>> Yahoo posts.
> Practice good e-mail security and you won't see them.
Allie, what do you mean? I thought those came with the territory on
TBOT. With people whose
Hello Andre!
On Wednesday, December 22, 2004, 7:00 AM, you wrote:
>> So, before I forget. Merry Christmas to all and a wonderful 2005!!!
> Merry Christmas and Happy new year to you and the rest of the list.
And do, please, let me add my own Season's Greetings to the series of
responses to Migue
Hello Tony!
On Monday, December 20, 2004, 3:52 AM, you wrote:
> TB> A liter of fresh human blood per day?
> Do Bat's have liters or just one at a time
:rofl2:
--
Best regards,
Mary
:Trill:
The Bat! 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Mica!
On Thursday, December 02, 2004, 1:35 PM, you wrote:
> Just a right click on a folder and select a Color Group (you have to
> have defined the background colour of the given Color Group first).
Where do you define those background colours?
--
Best regards,
Mary
:Trill: Jamais arri
Hello Mary!
On Thursday, December 02, 2004, 1:14 PM, you wrote:
> That is very pleasant to the eyes and decipherable to the brain's
> deciphering mechanism, Mica?
^
Punctuation typos, sorry. Meant to make a declarative statement,
..."decipherable to the brain's decip
Hello Mica!
On Thursday, December 02, 2004, 11:25 AM, you wrote:
> M>> Anybody got any ideas for the account tree windo
>> Pain? Best use emulsion in case you want to change the colour as it's
>> easier to scrape off the screen :)
>> Don't think there is another way to change it.
> What abo
Hello Tony!
On Wednesday, December 01, 2004, 4:43 PM, you wrote:
> MB> The background, too, Tony, or just the font?
> Both, you can have different ones for read and unread as I have if you
> want. I'm orf to bed, nighty night.
Okay. I'll have a play with it. :) Nighty-night and sweet dreams t
Hello Tony!
On Wednesday, December 01, 2004, 4:26 PM, you wrote:
> MB> I wish very much that this could be controlled through The Bat!
> It can, just set up a filter that filters every message to whatever colour
> you want. I have one that does just my posts but it's easy to *.* them
> all.
Hello MFPA!
On Wednesday, December 01, 2004, 3:51 PM, you wrote:
> Is it possible to change the colours of text and background in the
> message list and account tree windows?
Options/Preferences/Messaages/Colour Groups and Font/"Change" button
But this only changes the font.
For background, I'
Hello Pat!
On Monday, November 22, 2004, 5:42 PM, you wrote:
PJ> ... there still seems to be a hang problem. I checked with the ISP
PJ> and there is no problem there. I can only assume it is the new
PJ> computer, ...
Have you emptied your temp files? Sometimes too many TB! temp files
will cause
Hello Pat!
On Monday, November 22, 2004, 5:42 PM, you wrote:
PJ> Well, I got the transfer sorted and TB! is now neatly installed on
PJ> my new computer, but alas, there still seems to be a hang problem.
PJ> I checked with the ISP and there is no problem there. I can only
PJ> assume it is the new
Hello WilWilWil!
On Monday, November 22, 2004, 12:04 PM, you wrote:
W> So my question is : how can I do for using this warning mail
W> only for my friends. I want this feature OK only for person who are
W> in my addresses book.
W> A macro ? Template ? I could not find the way today...
WilWilWil
Hello Chris!
On Saturday, November 20, 2004, 5:07 AM, you wrote:
CW> Maybe it's time I submitted my image to the rogues!?
Waiting patiently to see you!
--
Best regards,
Mary
:Trill:
The Bat! 3.0.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
C
Hello Chris!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 10:26 AM, you wrote:
MB>> If you want what comes with TB! we shall have to advertise for
MB>> someone with an unedited version. :)
CW> Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could
CW> possibly send me?
I'm certain that someone does
Hello Tony!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 9:03 AM, you wrote:
TB> I'm new to this list so I thought I'd introduce myself. My names
TB> Tony and I hope I'm in the right place to learn about using
TB> Outlook Express.
Tony, you are a complete nut! OE indeed! But welcome aboard!
TB> I look forwa
Hello Chris!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Also, look in The Bat!/Images and be sure that you have both Default
MB>> and default.msl files there. Hope this helps. If not, please let us
MB>> know and we can explore further with you. :)
CW> Ah ha, we could have a winner. N
Hello WilWilWil!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:20 AM, you wrote:
W> How can I say that I want the message has high priority in a
W> template ? I can't find a macro for this...
From the Help File:
===
PRIORITY = "H/N/L" set th
Hello Chris!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 7:23 AM, you wrote:
CW> For some reason, the little yellow smilie faces that are part of
CW> TB! don't seem to be working.
CW> I have the option enabled in editor preferences but still nothing.
Are you using Rich Text View? Right-click in the View Fold
Hello Maggie!
On Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 4:33 PM, you wrote:
RO>> If 50 million people vote for something stupid, it's still stupid
M> :whisper: thank you!
If 190 million people vote for something stupid, it's still stupid!
:bounce-cheshire: :grin:
--
Best regards,
Mary
:Trill:
The Bat
Hello Anthony!
On Sunday, November 14, 2004, 8:51 AM, you wrote:
ASK>> I don't know - here, there is no top folder. My common folders
ASK>> are on the same level as the account's "top" folders.
AGA> Well, what is the top folder called in the common folder tree?
Here is the way my folder looks,
Hello Marten!
On Monday, November 08, 2004, 3:45 AM, you wrote:
aacu> Well yes but it's a bit annoying when you click a button and the
aacu> window behaves out of the ordinarily (good grammar construction
aacu> there!)
Not only annoying, but time-consuming when one has to stop to figure
out what
Hello Marten!
On Sunday, November 07, 2004, 8:12 PM, you wrote:
aacu> Ok Thi is what I can now do.
aacu> Open logfile : TB - Main Window - Account - View Log
aacu> The window opens at maximise. The minimise button is greyed out.
aacu> So I hit the other toggle button and the log window minimise
Hello Ivan!
On Sunday, November 07, 2004, 3:37 PM, you wrote:
A>> Wait a minute! I've just discovered what's going on! Obviously the
A>> last time I looked at a log, I must have minimised it.
I> I didn't understand. Log window cannot be minimized. It is
I> restricted action
Are we talking a
Hello Marten!
On Sunday, November 07, 2004, 3:01 PM, you wrote:
aacu> Wait a minute! I've just discovered what's going on! Obviously
aacu> the last time I looked at a log, I must have minimised it. Then
aacu> in subsequent reuqests - even after several shutdowns and start
aacu> ups over days, any
Hello Ivan!
On Friday, November 05, 2004, 8:35 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Kaspersky and TB! are no longer compatible
I> As I heard TheBat can work with KAV 4,5 - 5 (Personal)
I> via new plug-in klav 4.0.1.19
I>
http://www.thebatworld.de/modules/download/index.php?op=viewlinkdetails&lid=44&ttitle=Kasp
Hello WilWilWil!
On Thursday, November 04, 2004, 6:15 PM, you wrote, in part:
W> I had the same problem when testing KAV personal Pro 5 with TB3 !
W> TB3 froze because KAV blocked some TB databases files. It was very
W> annoying. That why I 've chosen AVG 7. Now viruses are great
W> managed and
Hello Pat!
On Thursday, November 04, 2004, 5:03 PM, you wrote:
PJ> I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and
PJ> virus protection I can,
Pat, I have had no problems with F-Secure.
http://www.f-secure.com/
I am using only its AV (it now offers a suite, new this year, with
Hello Michael!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 7:39 AM, you wrote:
MB>> How will he get his key in, when he receives it, if he does not
MB>> do an Installation, but just stays with the Home .exe (which is,
MB>> of course, identical to the Pro .exe) ?
MR> Well, I copied the (Pro) key that I had rec
Hello Roelof!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 7:08 AM, you wrote:
MB>> But I am still puzzled as to how he will put his Pro key in, when
MB>> he receives it--if I had paid $6 or 6 euros or whatever it was,
MB>> extra for the Upgrade, I would want my Help/About at the very
MB>> least to say: Profess
Hello Jeff!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 6:58 AM, you wrote:
MB>> But I am still puzzled as to how he will put his Pro key in, when
MB>> he receives it--if I had paid $6 or 6 euros or whatever it was,
MB>> extra for the Upgrade, I would want my Help/About at the very
MB>> least to say: Professio
Hello Mary!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 6:54 AM, you wrote:
JG>> I am sure Michael will be relieved to hear that if his email
JG>> client doesn't work he can get email support here
Jeff, I'm sorry for not quoting your Smiley--I did see it and it made
me smile. I am fighting a bug which seems l
Hello Jeff!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 6:19 AM, you wrote:
MB>> In the absolute worst case of a non-working application--highly
MB>> unlikely scenario--you can get help here on tbudl. Many very
MB>> experienced people read here and are happy to try to help.
JG> I am sure Michael will be relie
Hello Raymund!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 5:50 AM, you wrote:
MB>> "Professional Edition" just above the current version number. So
MB>> where in the TB! directory should I see the file which puts this
MB>> up?
RTT> There is no file, it is the registration key that you use. The
RTT> key is st
Hello Roelof!
On Monday, November 01, 2004, 2:25 AM, you wrote:
RO> Currently the .exe for both editions is identical and I've been
RO> led to believe that will continue to be so. As a beta tester
RO> yourself you should be aware that for testing purposes only one
RO> .exe is released, to be test
Hello Roelof!
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 6:21 PM, you wrote:
MR>> Should I just install the Pro over the Home version? Any other
MR>> potential issues?
RO> No real need for that. The only difference between the
RO> installation for home and pro is the international pack. It's the
RO> license t
Hello Michael!
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 4:09 PM, you wrote:
MR> I tried out the 3.01 Home version and decided to spend the extra $6
MR> for the Pro version. (You can tell that I'm a big spender .) I'm
MR> waiting for the registration key and have downloaded the Pro file.
I'm running the Pro
Hello Fellow Tbtech Subscribers!
On Saturday, October 30, 2004, 9:47 AM, Mary wrote, in part:
CT>> I wouldn't have thought it was that difficult to write a rule to
CT>> identify the format - but what do I know?
Sorry for the double post--I don't know what made that happen, since
all I did was pu
Hello Clive!
On Saturday, October 30, 2004, 9:04 AM, you wrote:
MB>> How could the View window distinguish between a legitimate,
MB>> long-standing, conventional use of the colon and the hi-jacked
MB>> Smiley use of enclosing colons?
CT> These thingies take the form of a colon, some text and ano
Hello Clive!
On Saturday, October 30, 2004, 1:14 AM, you wrote:
MB>> There was a lot of complaint about the Smiley colons for awhile
CT> While some of us continue to grumble into our beards about the
CT> wretched things. I just wish there was a text filter to expunge
CT> the little devils from m
Hello A.Translator!
On Friday, October 29, 2004, 1:13 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Why are you not posting to the tbbeta list about these betas?
MB>> It's very interesting, the discussions about them currently going
MB>> on there.
AT> Simply because I am not a beta tester. Haven't got the know how. I
AT>
Hello A.Translator!
On Friday, October 29, 2004, 8:03 AM, you wrote:
Gerard>> It is most probably your Internet connection that is down.
AT> It was not my internet connection for I could browse and use my
AT> newsreader
Sometimes it is the POP3 server and not the entire Internet connection
that
Hello JM!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 6:40 PM, you wrote:
MB>> But fully functional later, at which point the announcement said
MB>> that SecureBat as a stand-alone would be discontinued. That is
MB>> some way into the future, I imagine.
zzc> Just curious. Will that be in v3.x? OR after v3?
Hello WilWilWil!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 5:04 PM, you wrote:
MB>> All I can say is that I hope this was a good learning experience for
MB>> the Sales team
W> If not, they are masochistic ! ;-)
Then let us hope they are normal haters of pain and will keep more
open communications with t
Hello WilWilWil!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 5:01 PM, you wrote:
MB>> "Latest"? Does that mean you finally found a job? Or do you mean
MB>> "latest" in the sense of "last"?
W> Last in the sense of when I had a job ! I do not have a new job at
W> this time... :-(
I am so sorry. I followed wit
Hello Tony!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 12:07 PM, you wrote:
MB>> the announcement said that SecureBat as a stand-alone would be
MB>> discontinued. That is some way into the future, I imagine.
T> Can you give me the URL of that article please.
In addition to the comparison of features on the
Hello Tony!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 12:07 PM, you wrote:
T>>> Did I understand it correctly that the functionality of SecureBat
T>>> gets moved into TB Pro V3.x?
MB>> Yes. Available to be used only with "tokens" (I don't know what that
MB>> is or how it works)
< explanation of tokens sni
Hello Tony!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 11:32 AM, you wrote:
T> Did I understand it correctly that the functionality of SecureBat
T> gets moved into TB Pro V3.x?
Yes. Available to be used only with "tokens" (I don't know what that
is or how it works) at present. But fully functional later, at
Hello Gerard!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 7:32 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection.
G> Thanks for the reply but I was looking to change the EML extension
G> generated by TB! when you do an alternative forward with an HTML
G> msg.
Ah. I'd been reading the th
Hello Jeff!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 3:35 AM, you wrote, in part:
JG> ... I don't know if I was the closest to registering just before
JG> the new version but they seem to be treating us consistently. (If
JG> I had taken advantage of the full thirty day trial I could have
JG> had v3 as my f
Hello Gerard!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 6:36 AM, you wrote, in part:
G> were can I change this in TB! from EML to MSG?
Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection.
I am so skittish of messing with TB!'s default here, however, that
before I made a change I did a C&P to SmartBat, so t
Hello WilWilWil!
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 5:33 PM, you wrote, in part:
W> So good developers team with so pitiful sales service...
Yes. But something got through to them between the almost immediate,
very bad response to MFPA and the weeks-later rude offering to you of
a substantial disc
Hello WilWilWil!
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 5:18 PM, you wrote:
MB>> In my opinion, it is absolutely only fair for you to have it
MB>> under the same terms as those offered to WilWilWil!
After only 2 weeks or 3 months, respectively, use of v. 2.12.00.
W> Good and equitable way... :-)
Righ
Hello MFPA!
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 4:15 PM, you wrote:
RL >> You are not obliged to upgrade to the 3.xx version. The Bat!
RL >> version that you purchased is fully functional and has no time
RL >> limit in using. Upgrading is optional.
M> At least I got "Hello" and "Best regards".
I re
401 - 500 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo
