Dear Richard,
@30-Oct-2016, 9:29 + (30-Oct 09:59 here) Richard L de S Clauson
[RLD] in mid:1285301168.20161030095...@virbius.co.uk said to TBUDL:
...
>>> email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I
>>> use
...
>>> I'm not certain of the release
Saturday, September 24, 2016, 12:12:19 AM, Richard L de S Clauson
(rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote:
> Thursday, September 22, 2016, 1:42:15 PM, Marck Pearlstone
> (ma...@silverstones.com) wrote:
>> Dear Richard,
>>
>> @22-Sep-2016, 6:03 +0100 (22-Sep 12:26 here) Richard L de S Clauson
>> [RLD] in
Thursday, September 22, 2016, 1:42:15 PM, Marck Pearlstone
(ma...@silverstones.com) wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> @22-Sep-2016, 6:03 +0100 (22-Sep 12:26 here) Richard L de S Clauson
> [RLD] in mid:967995112.20160922122...@virbius.co.uk said to TBUDL:
>
> ...
>
> email ends up much wider
Dear Richard,
@22-Sep-2016, 6:03 +0100 (22-Sep 12:26 here) Richard L de S Clauson
[RLD] in mid:967995112.20160922122...@virbius.co.uk said to TBUDL:
...
email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I use
>> ... This is a bug in TB that was fixed 2 betas ago
Tuesday, September 13, 2016, 9:27:08 AM, Marck Pearlstone
(ma...@silverstones.com) wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> @13-Sep-2016, 0:41 +0100 (13-Sep 07:00 here) Richard L de S Clauson
> [RLD] in mid:273697223.20160913070...@virbius.co.uk said to Richard:
>
RLD>> Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35
Dear Richard,
@13-Sep-2016, 0:41 +0100 (13-Sep 07:00 here) Richard L de S Clauson
[RLD] in mid:273697223.20160913070...@virbius.co.uk said to Richard:
RLD> Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35 PM, Richard L de S Clauson
(rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote:
...
>> email ends up much wider than the
Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35 PM, Richard L de S Clauson
(rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote:
> For quite some time (probably over 2 years) dome of the HTML (formatted)
> emails I receive are formatted very badly by The Bat!.
>
> What is happening, and mainly caused by large embedded images, is
For quite some time (probably over 2 years) dome of the HTML (formatted)
emails I receive are formatted very badly by The Bat!.
What is happening, and mainly caused by large embedded images, is that the
email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I use
can display
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding received messages which
contain images now strips
Hello Rick,
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 you wrote:
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding received messages which
contain images now strips
Hi
I have a couple of contacts that send HTML emails formatted with some
of the text in black. As I read my email with white text on a black
background, I miss this bit of the text unless spacing suggests there
is something there to highlight.
There are no longer separate places to set PTV
Hi
Can anybody confirm or refute?
Links that are written as a URL to click in the HTML version of a
message are also available in the plaintext version.
Links where the text you click in the HTML version differs from the
URL are not present as links at all in the plaintext version.
--
Best
Hi
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 at 6:18:51 PM, in
mid:736350988.20090818181...@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of contacts that send HTML emails
formatted with some of the text in black. As I read my
email with white text on a black background, I miss
this bit of the text
Hi O.,
Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 9:12:37 AM, you wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm sorry, this is a VERY newbie question from a user of a couple of
years, however: how can I get TB! to display html messages, formatted
with graphics and everything else, in the message viewer pane or when
I double
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I'm sorry, this is a VERY newbie question from a user of a couple of
years, however: how can I get TB! to display html messages, formatted
with graphics and everything else, in the message viewer pane or when
I double click to open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 9:43:14 AM, Bob wrote:
BR Go to Options-Preferences and then click on the main viewer-editor
BR line to open a window. There, look at the viewing of .html
BR window - you get four choices, I believe.
Thanks for
Hello O.,
A reminder of what O. Martin Moran typed on:
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 12:47:02 GMT -0700
OMM Thanks for the reply. I have both of those set to HTML only and it still
doesn't
OMM work. Any other ideas?
On a message that has is HTML there should be a little globe with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 12:53:04 PM, Stuart wrote:
SC open you can select which images you want to allow to be downloaded. Once
SC allowed they will open from then on. You can do this manually each time or
SC select Show this Window
Hello WilWilWil,
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:31:49 +0200 GMT (21/04/2005, 01:31 +0700 GMT),
WilWilWil wrote:
TF TB doesn't switch automatically, that's an annoyance. You have to
TF right-click on the message and choose your character set. then the
TF message will be displayed correctly.
W Thanks.
W
TF TB doesn't switch automatically, that's an annoyance. You have to
TF right-click on the message and choose your character set. then the
TF message will be displayed correctly.
Thanks.
Does it mean that Ritlabs don't expect to sale in France ? ;-)
--
WilWilWil
:flag-france:
TB 3.0.1.33
TF TB doesn't switch automatically, that's an annoyance. You have to
TF right-click on the message and choose your character set. then the
TF message will be displayed correctly.
:-( It doesn't work. I always have strange characters, not the same, but
strange anyway. I've tried all set and
Hello,
I agree with users mean that its a good idea that TB uses its own html
routines, and does not use IE6 or Mozilla for viewing HTML messages in TB. More
safety against viruses.
But an important problem occurs: Im French and I receive messages with
accentuated characters as E
Hello WilWilWil,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:40:53 +0200 GMT (19/04/2005, 03:40 +0700 GMT),
WilWilWil wrote:
W But an important problem occurs: Im French and I receive
W messages with accentuated characters as E with acute, E grave or C
W cedil or others
W Latin 1 (ISO8859-1) is well implemented in
I don't usually use HTML for my email communication. However, once in
a while I receive HTML mails where formatting DOES matter. I would
like to preserve the HTML format when replying to those mails so that
I can quote and refer to the quoted text in my answer. Unfortunatey, I
have not yet been
Hello Anselm!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 8:56 AM, you wrote:
... I can create HTML mails from the scratch, but when I reply to a
mail, the reply defaults to Text only. When I toggle back to HTML,
the HTML formatting of the original mail is lost. What am I doing
wrong?
I have never had
Hello Anselm,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:56:26 +0100 GMT (14/01/2005, 21:56 +0700 GMT),
Anselm Buehling wrote:
AB I don't usually use HTML for my email communication. However, once in
AB a while I receive HTML mails where formatting DOES matter. I would
AB like to preserve the HTML format when
Hello Mary and Anselm!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
In your address book Reply templates, are you using macros that quote
the entire text you are replying to?
I got to thinking about possible macros and looked at the full
alphabetical list in Help/Help Topics/Index.
I
Hello Anselm Buehling everyone else,
on 14-Jan-2005 at 15:56 you (Anselm Buehling) wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Nothing. Its a long standing bug. Very annoying.
See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1807
...submitted October 2003 *sigh*
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Alexander,
Friday, January 14, 2005, 11:23:27 AM, you wrote and sent the following:
Nothing. Its a long standing bug. Very annoying.
See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1807
...submitted October 2003 *sigh*
That's a shame.
--
Andrew
Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
On Windows XP,
Hello Andrew!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 10:27 AM, you wrote:
Nothing. Its a long standing bug. Very annoying.
See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1807
...submitted October 2003 *sigh*
That's a shame.
Here's a quote from a supporting note in October, 2004:
Hello Mary, Thomas and Mary! ;-)
Thanks for your comments. I have tried the combination of the OTEXT
macro and the HTML only option but to no avail. The HTML formatting
of the original mail gets lost. Anyway, I would want to continue to
use MicroEd as standard editor and use HTML replies to HTML
Hello Anselm!
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 10:55 AM, you wrote:
It seems, then, that the answer is this:
On the other hand, it may be that it's not possible to do what you
want.
Which is a real drawback in an otherwise very good mail program ( the
only other substantial drawback which
Hallo Anselm,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:55:12 +0100GMT (14-1-2005, 17:55 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
AB only other substantial drawback which comes to my mind is the missing
AB Unicode support).
AB Thanks, all the best,
AB Anselm
AB
AB
Hi Roloef,
Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any
difference to whether or not you need a cut mark.
[sigh] - Actually I deleted my signature (and the delimiter) in order
to avoid problems of this kind. I didn't realize that a signature is
apparently
Hi Mary,
Well, as Alexander pointed out, it's a recognized bug. So you might go
here and write a supporting note:
Thanks, done! Feel free to join me there, everyone! :-)
Have a nice weekend,
Anselm
--
Anselm Buehling - Translations EN/RU DE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+49 30 6950 4870 |phone
+49
Hello Leif,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 12:58:30 AM, you wrote:
LG Hi DB,
LG On Tue, 25 May 2004, at 17:31:23 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:31 PM where
LG I live) you wrote:
D I'd like to view messages in HTML in only a specific set of
D folders(trusted messages). Is this possible in any form(or even
Hello Mark,
Friday, May 28, 2004, 11:13:59 AM, you wrote:
Mark Those who want to support it, can leave a note in the Bugtrack
Mark https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php bug id: 0001270
Done... Thanks.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Tagline of the day:
CAUTION: This
Hello Mark,
On Fri, 28 May 2004 19:13:59 +0200 GMT (29/05/2004, 00:13 +0700 GMT),
Mark Partous wrote:
D I'd like to view messages in HTML in only a specific set of
D folders(trusted messages). Is this possible in any form(or even the
D inverse as I could check off folders not to view in HTML)?
Been looking through the archives for awhile(view+folder+HTML gives a good number of
hits)
and haven't been able to find anything related.
I'd like to view messages in HTML in only a specific set of folders(trusted messages).
Is this possible in any form(or even the inverse as I could check off
Hi DB,
On Tue, 25 May 2004, at 17:31:23 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:31 PM where
I live) you wrote:
D I'd like to view messages in HTML in only a specific set of
D folders(trusted messages). Is this possible in any form(or even the
D inverse as I could check off folders not to view in HTML)?
Not
Hello People,
I have very wierd (to me) situation. I've set up HTML to be my
defaulght email editor. It works fine but the Bat doesn't send HTML
messages. If I change the format to plain, then it works fine.
Any ides?
Thanks,
Sincerely,
Mamuka Khantadze
Finance Administration
, May 12, 2004, 7:10:12 PM, Mamuka Khantadze wrote:
Hello People,
I have very wierd (to me) situation. I've set up HTML to be my
defaulght email editor. It works fine but the Bat doesn't send HTML
messages. If I change the format to plain, then it works fine.
Any ides?
Thanks
Hello Ian,
You wrote:
Ian A. White Mamuka,
Ian A. White On Wednesday, May 12, 2004, 7:40:12 PM,
Ian A. White you (Mamuka Khantadze) wrote:
MK Hello People,
MK I have very wierd (to me) situation. I've set up HTML to be my
MK defaulght email editor. It works fine but the Bat doesn't
Thanks Thomas Edgar,
I have gotten the MIME attachment to work. It is not quite what I
want.
When someone sends an HTML message it opens, even in TheBAT, with all
the colors, bolds, etc that the sender wantedeven, in most cases,
with the links enabled if clicked on. This is what I would
Hello JRS2,
On Monday, November 10, 2003, 2:51:55 PM, you wrote:
Thanks Thomas Edgar,
I have gotten the MIME attachment to work. It is not quite what I
want.
When someone sends an HTML message it opens, even in TheBAT, with all
the colors, bolds, etc that the sender wantedeven, in
Hello Edgar,
Monday, November 10, 2003, 2:07:21 PM, you wrote:
E Hello JRS2,
E On Monday, November 10, 2003, 2:51:55 PM, you wrote:
Thanks Thomas Edgar,
I have gotten the MIME attachment to work. It is not quite what I
want.
When someone sends an HTML message it opens, even in TheBAT,
Hello,
I am a relatively early user of TheBAT. I know that there are
good reasons only display HTML messages (or parts there of), in
TheBAT, that do not require access to the web.
My problem is that I do not know how to forward these HTML
messages so that they will 1) look
Hello JRS2,
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:45:36 -0500 GMT (08/11/2003, 01:45 +0700 GMT),
JRS2 wrote:
My problem is that I do not know how to forward these HTML
messages so that they will 1) look the same as they do in TheBAT's
HTML view or 2) if I am secure about the web access content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote:'
I decided to make this message not thread with yours since it's a
different, though related issue that aught not to be lost in the 'HTML
mail or not' debate.
PC actually, I'm
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, 11:10 AM, you wrote:
AM I decided to make this message not thread with yours since it's a
AM different, though related issue that aught not to be lost in the 'HTML
AM mail or not' debate.
thanks, I almost missed the answer while reading 57 new messages quickly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote:'
PC hmm, not sure I want to do that with HTML,
Hmmm. If not, then how do you feel about browsing the internet? It's
the same html interpreter you're using. The same
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, 2:21 PM, you wrote:
PC hmm, not sure I want to do that with HTML,
AM Hmmm. If not, then how do you feel about browsing the internet? It's
AM the same html interpreter you're using. The same vulnerabilities
AM you're concerned about when opening the html attachment
Hello all,
Can TB write HTML messages? Is there a way to add a plug in or something
like that? I could not find any information about it in the help files.
--
Alaeddin Muntasser
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL
Hi Alaeddin,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:15:42 +0400, you wrote:
Can TB write HTML messages? Is there a way to add a plug in or something
like that? I could not find any information about it in the help files.
No, TB cannot write HTML messages... at least not yet. There have been mentions
(much
Hello Jonathan,
(much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in
Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
Alaeddin
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Sh'mae Alaeddin,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 11:32:02 [GMT +0400] (08:32 where I live) you wrote:
AM Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly written
to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for
Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be
tightly written
to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example.
this makes sense.. the company I work for is paranoid about security and TB
is the corporate standard for this reason I guess.
Alaeddin
Hi Adam,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:56:13 +0100, you wrote:
AM Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly
written to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example.
I wouldn't just say security
Hello Alaeddin,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:32:02 +0400 GMT (18/08/02, 14:32 +0700 GMT),
Alaeddin Muntasser wrote:
(much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in
AM Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
It is not bad for some people, it is bad for all people.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 11:15:42 +0400 Alaeddin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
AM Can TB write HTML messages?
Officially, no. Unofficially, yes. But this is work of devil.
;-) Nobody loves HTML mail, and if such lov
Hi TBUDL,
First off, I hate HTML messages as much as anyone, but here at work I
am forced to use M$ Outlook 2002 on an Exchange Server. What I have
set up is an account within TB! so that I can save a message and
import it to TB! and reply if needed. It works fairly well on text
only messages
When receiving html messages, it occurs to me very often that the bat!
does not show them (it stays on the message I viewed before) and does
not mark it as read after a few seconds. Sometimes, it helps to
restart the bat!, but this does not carry me far. Does anyone have an
idea about what to do
Hello Markus,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:42:05 +0200 GMT (27/06/02, 13:42 +0700 GMT),
Markus Mueller wrote:
MM When receiving html messages, it occurs to me very often that the bat!
MM does not show them (it stays on the message I viewed before) and does
MM not mark it as read after a few seconds
I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not all HTML parts of
the message is rendering, such as graphics and other parts of the HTML
message. The same message appears to render fine in Microsoft Outlook
Express 6.0 and Netscape Communicator 4.79 Messenger.
Is this a known TheBat! HTML
Hello Mark,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:26:22 AM, you digitally penned the following;
MK I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not all HTML parts of
MK the message is rendering, such as graphics and other parts of the HTML
MK message. The same message appears to render fine
Probably the parts that you are not seeing are not embedded in the
message. Many commercial HTML messages link to a server for graphics
(as well as, occasionally, for other purposes such as web bugs). TB!'s
native viewer will not D/L from the Internet the way that OE and NS
do; in the minds
Hello Mark
At 1:26 PM on Saturday, May 04, 2002 you wrote the following
about [TheBat does not fully render HTML messages]:
Mark I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not
Mark all HTML parts of the message is rendering, such as
Mark graphics and other parts of the HTML message
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 11:35:19 AM, Don Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any suggestions?
There is currently a debate on the beta list about whether the latest
betas are ready to be release candidates. I would think it would be
worthwhile to join the beta list, get the link to the beta, and
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 6:41:49 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
DAC There is currently a debate on the beta list about whether the
DAC latest betas are ready to be release candidates. I would think it
DAC would be worthwhile to join the beta list, get the link to the
DAC beta, and give
Hello Don,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:35:19 -0800GMT (19-3-02, 18:35 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
DT It started one day when I received an Outlook-created text/HTML combo
DT message that wouldn't display either the text or HTML portion. After
DT receiving that message (which long ago has
Roelof,
Does the message show when you're viewing the source-code? (Press F9)
Yes, I can see both parts of the message in the source window, even
when I'm getting a blank viewer window.
-Don
--
Archives :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:37:33 -0500GMT (which was 21:37 +0100GMT where I live),
Don Zeigler thought about html messages in TB viewer and wrote:
DZ TB should have an option similar to the one in Pocomail. When viewing an
DZ html message in Poco
Hello TBUDL,
Does anyone know how or where the settings are to show the entire
html message in the Bat's viewer. I get part of the message but
there are question marks where pictures are supposed to be.
--
Best regards,
JP mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On 24 Dec 2001, 11:45:16 AM, JP wrote:
Does anyone know how or where the settings are to show the entire
html message in the Bat's viewer. I get part of the message but
there are question marks where pictures are supposed to be.
click on the message, and view it in your default browser.
--
Hi JP,
On 24 Dec 2001 at 11:45:16 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
J Does anyone know how or where the settings are to show the entire
J html message in the Bat's viewer. I get part of the message but
J there are question marks where pictures are supposed to be.
Sorry, no setting. It's intended
On 12/24/2001, Lars Geiger wrote:
Sorry, no setting. It's intended behavior, as showing graphics which
are not embedded into an email poses a security risc. This can be used
to track the time when you read a certain email, for example. Or many
other nasty things.
TB should have an option
I am wondering if there is a way to change the background color of a
message received in HTML. On e-mail lists, when a post is sent in
HTML, it appears as black print on a medium grey background; very hard
to read. I can click on the 1 tab at the bottom and see it without
the formatting, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sam,
On 26 October 2001 at 07:35:06 [GMT-0500] (which was 13:35 where I
live) Sam wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
S Perhaps there is a way to make the 1 tab default?
Options | Preferences | General | Display HTML part of
Hello Sam,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:35:06 -0500 GMT (26/10/2001, 20:35 +0800 GMT),
Sam wrote:
S I am wondering if there is a way to change the background color of a
S message received in HTML.
I think the background colour is sent with the message.
S I can click on the 1 tab at the bottom and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sam,
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 05:35:06 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to HTML messages:
I am wondering if there is a way to change the background color of a
message received in HTML. On e-mail lists, when a post
Hi Nick,
I'm not a big fan of HTML e-mail and I guess that is why I use
the-bat. Someone suggested deselecting the show HTML automatically,
which I tried, but I have since received another message and I don't
see any difference. It did not have the black print on a medium gray
background.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sam,
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 07:53:19 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to HTML messages:
I'm not a big fan of HTML e-mail and I guess that is why I use
the-bat. Someone suggested deselecting the show HTML automatically
I may have to recant my previous statement. I think, since changing
the display HTML Part of Message, that the HTML messages are opening
in the 1 tab and therefore doing away with the medium gray
background with the black type. I hope this is the way all will come
in. A thank you much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 8:04:43 AM PDT, Nick Andriash wrote:
My gripe is the amount of time and effort that has been put into the
HTML'ising of TB! when there are outstanding bugs and features yet
to be implemented.
Hello Nick,
I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, October 26, 2001 at 7:44:25 PM ,
Nick Andriash wrote about HTML messages:
That is one of the main reasons why most of us don't want to
see HTML in E-Mail and are puzzled as to RITLabs insistence on
including it. :o(
Nick, as long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Melissa Reese,
On Friday, October 26 2001 at 10:26 AM PDT, you wrote:
I would be interested in just which ...outstanding bugs... you would
like to see implemented? ;-)
Ha ha ha! Ok, let me re-phrase my statement:
when there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Silviu Cojocaru,
On Friday, October 26 2001 at 10:55 AM PDT, you wrote:
Nick, as long as the developers provide an option to deactivate
viewing HTML parts by default and as the HTML editor will be
included, a way for the user to deactivate
Hello,
Thursday, June 14, 2001, 7:29:57 AM, you wrote:
DS Hello,
DS I had a problem when I installed 1.52x with the connection center. I
DS noticed that with some accounts the cc would come up,download the
DS message and the cc would stay connected with the status bar fully
DS 'lit'.
DS I
noticed that this solved the favorites problem and I was also
able to view the wayward HTML messages that were earlier showing as a
blank page.
I then went and reloaded the Java VM and also re-installed IE 5.5 and
ran the Internet Repair option. This has fixed my IE problem and
without wanting
display of .png graphics I decided to revert back to IE
DS ver 5. I noticed that this solved the favorites problem and I was also
DS able to view the wayward HTML messages that were earlier showing as a
DS blank page.
DS I then went and reloaded the Java VM and also re-installed IE 5.5 and
DS ran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 15 June 2001 at 22:09:17 +0100 (which was 22:09 where I live)
David Stone wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
DS I hope nobody misunderstands me. I'm not complaining about the cc
DS just reporting what I'm seeing. I like
Hello,
Friday, June 15, 2001, 10:29:22 PM, you wrote:
MDP Hi David,
MDP On 15 June 2001 at 22:09:17 +0100 (which was 22:09 where I live)
MDP David Stone wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
MDP Although I have seen some sticking with the CC, I've found that
MDP forcing a
Hi there,
I've installed The Bat! 1.51 in my computer (running Win2k), and am
thus far enjoying it greatly. However, I have noticed a problem when
reading my e-mail - it looks like certain type of HTML messages are
not rendered properly. Most of the HTML messages I receive are shown
Hi Santiago,
@ 2:27:17 PM on 4/14/2001, Santiago Cimadevilla wrote:
...
SC I've installed The Bat! 1.51 in my computer (running Win2k), and am
SC thus far enjoying it greatly. However, I have noticed a problem when
SC reading my e-mail - it looks like certain type of HTML messages are
SC
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your help. I've been trying a few things, and apparently
this is something that happened only with certain messages that I
imported from Eudora light. I even noted which e-mails were shown
wrong and had them re-sent to me by the original senders, and the new
copy is
Hi Santiago,
@ 3:55:32 PM on 4/14/2001, Santiago Cimadevilla wrote:
...
SC So I guess it's something with those imported messages only. Maybe
SC Eudora did something strange. But in any case, it doesn't seem to
SC happen with new messages, so it won't be a problem.
I had a feeling this had
Hello TBUDL,
I am just asking, is it possible to compose HTML messages in The Bat?
Thank you in advance.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Friday, January 19, 2001, Lija wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
newbie: Writing HTML messages?:
L I am just asking, is it possible to compose HTML messages in The Bat?
No. You can attach HTML documents. You can export message with HTML
attachment,replace
Januk wrote:
Yes, but this is far from an ideal solution. :-) I actually meant,
there is no way to have TB open a link in a new Netscape Window
*automagically.* There is supposedly a way to have IE5 force open a
new window too, but I can't find it. Oh well, these are old topics
that
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
