Re: Browser does not open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Mike Alexander wrote... TF>> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the TF>> internet. Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that TF>> "Word" (not IE) is attempting to connnect to IP-address TF

Re: when a server is not a server...

Hello Gerard, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:30:21 +0100 GMT (12/03/03, 22:30 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: AM>> It's possible to have two pc's with a TB! installation using the AM>> same message bases and accounts. > Any idea what happens when both try to access the files at the same time? Loss of data in

Re[3]: Browser does not open

Hello Mike, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 9:00:46 PM, you wrote: MA> Hi Thomas, MA> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:30:30 AM, you wrote: TF>> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet. TF>> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE) TF>> is attem

Re: Browser does not open

Hello Mike, On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:00:46 + GMT (13/03/03, 09:00 +0700 GMT), Mike Alexander wrote: TF>> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE) TF>> is attempting to connnect to IP-address so-and-so, port 80. That's all TF>> I know. > It is because (now don't lau

Re: Browser does not open

Hello Pete, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:24:48 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 22:24 +0700 GMT), Pete Holsberg wrote: TF>> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet. TF>> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE) TF>> is attempting to connnect to IP-address s

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Peter, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:56:35 +0100 GMT (12/03/03, 17:56 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: TF>> In any case, I think the current version of not locking files at all TF>> is dangerous if two users write to it at the same time. Any TF>> application that is networkable should you file

Re: when a server is not a server...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote: MO> I myself are interested in having TB! installed as a server on MO> machine A, and on machine B run TB! with two accounts, one which MO> should connect to the server as a non tcp/ip workstation, the other MO> which shoul

Re: when a server is not a server...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerard [G] wrote: G> Any idea what happens when both try to access the files at the same G> time? Since I haven't tried it, I'm not sure. I hope someone with such a setup can step in here and share their experience. - -- -= allie_M =- | List

Re: when a server is not a server...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ss [S] wrote: S> (large ship) (to save bytes, you know :-) AM>>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\rit\The Bat!\\Working Directory S> Thank you very much for the hot tip... You're welcome. :) AM>>If you simply change the Mail directory via the TB

Re[2]: SecureBat

Hi SS, S>>> And these fellas are itching to "make examples" so as to create S>>> case-law and various other precedents of unbelievably heavy S>>> punishment for otherwise naive or harmless offences! WM>> Really? Examples? S> Well, they are itching I say, they haven't done it

Re: when a server is not a server...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: PC> this synchro process isn't exactly meeting my needs, or I'm not able PC> to do it right. For simplicity sake, say I have 2 accounts HOME & PC> WORK. I get most of my mail from the HOME account, but need access PC> to bo

Re[2]: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Hi Marck, MDP> Please stop quoting the VB100 report as if they are "the only game MDP> in town". This is misleading and only an opinion - not by any means MDP> the logical conclusion you make it out to be. Yes, I have read their MDP> testing criteria and personally dismiss them as imperfect. AVG i

Re[2]: Browser does not open

Hi Thomas, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:30:30 AM, you wrote: TF> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet. TF> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE) TF> is attempting to connnect to IP-address so-and-so, port 80. That's all TF> I know.

Re[2]: when a server is not a server...

Allie, Good answer! AM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- AM> Hash: SHA1 AM> Ss [S] wrote: S>> Reason is dead simple - I have one main PC (the "server") where most S>> of the mailing stuff gets done (will be done), but I have another PC S>> in the bedroom, on which I would lazy over on Sundays

Re[3]: recomend another mailer ?

All, It's funny, I started using the Bat for the clean interface. Outlook has too many security problems. Outlook Express has a nice simple interface, but is too uncontrolled and too much a security risk. The Bat gets back to doing email as TEXT, and not trying for the risky html responsiveness of

Re[2]: Message formating

Hi, Melissa, I had the same problem, Stefan suggested I try the Beta version, and that solved the problem. John Gxile === Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:42:02 PM, you wrote: MAU> Hello Melissa, >> Of course, in addition to a sender's wrap setting, what wraps

Re: Message formating

Hello Melissa, > Of course, in addition to a sender's wrap setting, what wraps and > doesn't wrap in the preview pane depends on the size of font you > choose to display messages with...and also on your screen > size/resolution. You are very right. I always and only use the preview pane and I usu

Re: Using PC-Cillin 2000 Pop 3 Scan with The Bat

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 at 21:32:51GMT + (which was 4:32 PM where I live) Duncan Strand wrote and made these points on the subject of "Using PC-Cillin 2000 Pop 3 Scan with The Bat": DS> Mark Partous on Sunday, March 9, 2003, 4:43:22 PM, you scribed: >> Perhaps this is nothing new

Re: recomend another mailer ?

Spyder wrote: S> I find the learning curve on The Bat to be a little steep (ok, I never read S> manuals) and it has taken time to learn where everything (a lot of features in S> here for a version 1. software program) is in the menus (wow, F9 rocks) but I S> attribute the learning curve to the fact

Re: recomend another mailer ?

I have Outlook for 1 email address (and calendar stuff) and The Bat for the other 29. If you are looking for a strong Email only program, The Bat is it. I find the learning curve on The Bat to be a little steep (ok, I never read manuals) and it has taken time to learn where everything (a lot of fe

Re[5]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Hello rick, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 10:11:29 PM, you wrote: r> Hello Martin, r> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:19:18 PM, you wrote: MW>> Everyone, I guess Rick likes Nod32 (Eset)! And I'm sure it's a good MW>> product. But it's certainly not the only one... And your assessment is MW>> a little

DEAD HORSE (was NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG))

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @13-Mar-2003, 09:06 +1100 (22:06 UK time) Thomas Sadler said: >>Thanks for everybodies frank and honest replies!!, Huh! >>perhaps its time this kettle of fish was closed! :) It is - already done on another branch. And again here. > Sec

DEAD HORSE (was [thebatlist] Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi rick, @12-Mar-2003, 14:40 -0500 (19:40 UK time) rick [R] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R> ... This is also nothing but your gob spewing forth opinion Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being

Re[4]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Hello Martin, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:19:18 PM, you wrote: MW> Hello rick, MW> Everyone, I guess Rick likes Nod32 (Eset)! And I'm sure it's a good MW> product. But it's certainly not the only one... And your assessment is MW> a little misleading (if not false). For example, the tests go b

Re[3]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:03:40 +, Steve Fisher wrote: >Thanks for everybodies frank and honest replies!!, perhaps its time >this kettle of fish was closed! :) Seconded. It's time for the trout to fly!! -- Cheers, Tom Sadler Get your mind out

Re[2]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Thanks for everybodies frank and honest replies!!, perhaps its time this kettle of fish was closed! :) Steve Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Hello John, There are a number of good AV programs in the market. You don't have to knock one down in order to make yours look better. I use NOD since it's one of the fastest in scanning my system. It has also won the 2003 Power Tools Forum award, and I have to say there are many programs in t

Re: Using PC-Cillin 2000 Pop 3 Scan with The Bat

Mark Partous on Sunday, March 9, 2003, 4:43:22 PM, you scribed: > Perhaps this is nothing new to those who allready used PC-Cillin 2000 Pop 3 > Scan within The Bat Nope, nightmare trying to figure out how to have Pop3Scan and POPFile scan together :) Username ended up as: 127.0.0.1:meusername/po

Re[3]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Hello rick, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 8:35:10 PM, you wrote: r> Nod32 is a very fine anti-virus program. Tests conducted by virus r> bulletin have indicated that nod32 detects more virii than any other r> current anti-virus program. r> www.nod32.com is url for nod r> http://www.virusbtn.com/in

Re[3]: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Mark, On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Mark Partous wrote in : JN>> Was the virus in a zipped archive, and was NOD set to scan archives? MP> Where should one do that? Add it to the list of file extensions? I thought it could be set in Amon, the real-time scanner, but appa

Re: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Hello Steve, you wrote: SF> Sorry - new to list and having difficulty following this thread, what SF> is NOD?? It is a very poor anti-virus program. It doesn't even compare to "AntiVir" You can get AntiVir here http://www.free-av.com -- John Morse pagemaker (at) semo (dot)

Re[2]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Hello Steve, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:22:31 PM, you wrote: SF> Sorry - new to list and having difficulty following this thread, what SF> is NOD?? Nod32 is a very fine anti-virus program. Tests conducted by virus bulletin have indicated that nod32 detects more virii than any other current ant

Re: Foxmail

Hello Roelof, 23Mb isn't actually all that much mail when you thin about it. I'm notoriously bad at using archives and often need two or three year old mails while travelling. So I keep much of it local.. 3 gig was record before I just had to archive something. So Even if I was better at archiv

Re: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

Sorry - new to list and having difficulty following this thread, what is NOD?? Steve Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Message formating

Thanks Roelof I prefer the full height tree, I have only been using TB for a few days and I mainly decided to try it to improve my organisation!, so if this is a consequence then I will live with it. Steve Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL"

Re[2]: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Hello Joseph, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:50:34 PM, you wrote: JN> Was the virus in a zipped archive, and was NOD set to scan archives? Where should one do that? Add it to the list of file extensions? -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7

Re: Foxmail

Hallo John, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:28:49 -0600GMT (12-3-03, 20:28 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO>> 23 MB of mail JM> Thats allot of mail! Depends on the attachments. 6400 and some messages, I think that was Foxmail's main problem with the amount. -- Groetjes, Roelof

Re: Bat Hangs Constantly

Hello Aidan, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 5:24:35 PM, you wrote: AM> I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the internal AM> anti-virus protection the bat has, though not positive. I AM> have no anti-virus setup within the bat, but have PC-cilin AM> running on my computer. Which version of PC

Re: [thebatlist] Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Hello Kim, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 7:21:15 AM, you wrote: K> By the way, not to get into a debate, but the term is technically K> "viruses" and not "virii", although admittedly, many people do tend to K> use that term. I know this but I prefer the term virii. -- Best regards, rick

Re: [thebatlist] Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Hello Marck, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 6:01:16 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi rick, MDP> @12-Mar-2003, 01:03 -0500 (06:03 UK time) rick [R] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R>> AVG is like swiss cheese when it comes to virus protection. MDP>

Re: Foxmail

Hello John Morse, On or about Wednesday, March 12, 2003 at 13:28:49GMT -0600 (which was 2:28 PM in the tropics where I live) John Morse espoused: RO>> 23 MB of mail JM> Thats allot of mail! Nah, that's only about 3 hours worth for me on an average day :^) -- Warmest tropical wish

Re: Foxmail

Roelof Otten wrote: RO> Well, actually it wasn't 'help', at least not for you. It was RO> done to disprove your statement But, you helped me anyway... thanks! -- Regards, John Morse Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: ht

Re: Foxmail

Roelof Otten wrote: RO> 23 MB of mail Thats allot of mail! -- Regards, John Morse Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Bat Hangs Constantly

Hello Aidan, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 12:24:35 PM, you wrote: > Hello People, > I did a search on this archive but found nothing to help, > hope ye can... > The Bat hangs at least twice on every session, and always > hangs. It hangs when downloading mail from the internet. It > hangs when pla

Re[2]: SecureBat

Hi Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 10:57:56 AM, you wrote: >> B) Viruses. > Why would encryption help against viruses? As I said in my e-mail it doesn't apply to me. But as you may know there are viruses out there that extract e-mail contacts from any file on the hard drive. If the contact is encrypte

Re[2]: New to TheBat, problem with GNUPG

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 6:16:16 PM, you wrote: RO> Hallo Sean, RO> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:31:49 +GMT (12-3-03, 13:31 +0100, where I RO> live), you wrote: SR>> I am new to TheBat and I am trying to get it to use gnupg. RO> I

Re: New to TheBat, problem with GNUPG

Hallo Sean, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:31:49 +GMT (12-3-03, 13:31 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SR> I am new to TheBat and I am trying to get it to use gnupg. I saw your problem is fixed. But you included your address in your signature. Since this list has public webbased archives, addresse

Re: Foxmail

Hallo John, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:13:51 -0600GMT (12-3-03, 17:13 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Third attempt with Foxmail. This program is not quite rfc RO>> compliant. It does all kind of illegal things with the address RO>> headers. And some smtp-servers are more leniant than others.

Re[2]: when a server is not a server...

Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 11:41:55 AM, Marcus wrote: > I myself are interested in having TB! installed as a server on machine > A, and on machine B run TB! with two accounts, one which should connect > to the server as a non tcp/ip workstation, the other which should work > as a generic email cli

Re: SecureBat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roberto, @12-Mar-2003, 10:39 -0500 (15:39 UK time) Roberto Machorro [RM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I've been using TB! for almost a year and a half now, and loving >> it. But now the itch to try out SecureBat has begun and I'm >> thinking

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Hello John, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:48:09 -0600 GMT (12/03/03, 13:48 +0700 GMT), John Morse wrote: TF>> Now this is a "really" scientific approach... > So you want something that science says works, > even if it doesn't work in real life? If it doesn't work in real life, it's not science

Bat Hangs Constantly

Hello People, I did a search on this archive but found nothing to help, hope ye can... The Bat hangs at least twice on every session, and always hangs. It hangs when downloading mail from the internet. It hangs when placing mail in the outbox or when sending it and it hangs when closing. This al

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Joseph N. wrote: JN> Was the virus in a zipped archive, and was NOD set to scan archives? I tried it both ways, zipped and unzipped. NOD did not catch it either way. AntiVir did catch it even zipped. -- Regards, John Morse

Re: Foxmail

Roelof Otten wrote: RO> Hello, TBUDL, RO> Third attempt with Foxmail. This program is not quite rfc compliant. It does all RO> kind of illegal things with the address headers. And some smtp-servers are more RO> leniant than others. How did you get it to work. thanks for your help.

Re: SecureBat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Roberto Machorro wrote... >> I've been using TB! for almost a year and a half now, and loving >> it. But now the itch to try out SecureBat has begun and I'm >> thinking on purchasing a license for it. > Anyway... so any

Re[2]: recomend another mailer ?

Hi If you search the archive you will see my evil comments about the editor way months ago. Now I actually open up SmartBat to edit text or a blank email to edit text and spell-check it. It grows on you! Roberto Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 11:48:16 PM, you wrote: > Matt Thoene wrote: MT>> The Bat!

Re: SecureBat

Hi everyone, Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 9:50:30 PM, you wrote: > I've been using TB! for almost a year and a half now, and loving it. > But now the itch to try out SecureBat has begun and I'm thinking on > purchasing a license for it. Anyway... so any comments on it? I'm not worried about someone p

Re: when a server is not a server...

ON Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 12:15:48 PM, you wrote: AM> It's possible to have two pc's with a TB! installation using the same AM>message bases and accounts. Hi Allie, Any idea what happens when both try to access the files at the same time? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Browser does not open

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Pete Holsberg wrote... > "PFW"?? Personal Firewall maybe? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New to TheBat, problem with GNUPG

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:23:26 PM, you wrote: JA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- JA> Hash: SHA1 JA> On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Sean Rima wrote... >> I am new to TheBat and I am trying to get it to use gnupg. I have >> gnu

Re: SecureBat

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, SS wrote... JA>> No offence intended... but this is something on this list that I think > Hey, none taken man! Excellent :) JA>> [..] the posting method. [..] > Oh boy, not another top posting / down posting match now, please. > I'll just do whatever you want me to

Re[3]: Browser does not open

Hello Brian, Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 10:30:17 PM, you wrote: BSM> And here is a possible answer, per Microsoft - has to do with a BSM> corrupted registry file: BSM> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=310049 Thanks. I found thatthe value for that key was the full pathname of "iexplorer.exe -n

Re[2]: New to TheBat, problem with GNUPG

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:23:26 PM, you wrote: >> I am new to TheBat and I am trying to get it to use gnupg. I have >> gnupg setup in c:\gnupg and the path is set for it. But if I try to >> sign a message it complains that it canno

Re[2]: Browser does not open

Hello Thomas, Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 11:30:30 PM, you wrote: TF> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet. TF> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE) TF> is attempting to connnect to IP-address so-and-so, port 80. That's all TF> I know.

Re: New to TheBat, problem with GNUPG

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Sean Rima wrote... > I am new to TheBat and I am trying to get it to use gnupg. I have > gnupg setup in c:\gnupg and the path is set for it. But if I try to > sign a message it complains that it cannot find my public key.

Re: when a server is not a server...

Hello Allie, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 11:15:48 AM, you wrote: (large ship) (to save bytes, you know :-) AM>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\rit\The Bat!\\Working Directory Thank you very much for the hot tip... AM>If you simply change the Mail directory via the TB! interface, TB! AM>wil

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

John, On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, John Morse wrote in : JM> I was sent a Virus... my favorite Anti-Virus program Grisoft AVG did JM> not detect it, and I have the latest update! JM> NOD32 did not detect it, yes I downloaded the latest update. JM> I download the Free Anti

Re: SecureBat

Hello William, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 6:42:00 AM, you wrote: WM> Hello SS WM> Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:07:15 AM, WM> in which you wrote: S>> And these fellas are itching to "make examples" so as to create S>> case-law and various other prece

Re: SecureBat

Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:25:17 AM, you wrote: JA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- JA> Hash: SHA1 JA> On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, SS wrote... >> I don't know about features of the Secure Bat, but wish to remind >> you that under the current laws in the UK you HAVE to remem

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 at 23:24:27GMT -0600 (which was 12:24 AM where I live) John Morse wrote and made these points on the subject of "NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?": JM> I was sent a Virus... my favorite Anti-Virus program Grisoft AVG did JM> not detect it, and I have the latest upda

Re[2]: recomend another mailer ?

Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:11:39 AM, Thomas wrote: >> Mac: > Mac (at least the new MacOS X10) has a built-in mailer, which looked > OK to me on first sight. I don't know whether it can handle multiple > accounts as beautifully as TB, that would be important for me. But is > also has built-in sp

Re[2]: recomend another mailer ?

Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:15:52 AM, Thomas wrote: > I am not quite sure what you mean here. My (not very strong) > ciriticism is that TB's interface appeals *only* to IT professioanls, > but hey, I like it. It has no bells and whistles, it is designed for > people who live, think, eat, and brea

New to TheBat, problem with GNUPG

Hello tbudl, I am new to TheBat and I am trying to get it to use gnupg. I have gnupg setup in c:\gnupg and the path is set for it. But if I try to sign a message it complains that it cannot find my public key. I cannot find the answre to this one. The actual output is: gpg: no default se

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

Hi Rick, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 1:03:14 AM, you wrote: > hahahahaha. People get real. NO anti-virus product detects 100% of all > virii. Go and look at the issues of virus bulletin and you > will see in the charts how many virii were missed by each product. > Nod32 consistenly misses fewer vi

Re: Fw: Fw: Foxmail

Hello, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 7:46:14 AM, you wrote: > Hello, TBUDL, > Third attempt with Foxmail. This program is not quite rfc compliant. It does all > kind of illegal things with the address headers. And some smtp-servers are more > leniant than others. Just to confirm Roelof findin

Re: when a server is not a server...

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 6:15 AM, you wrote: AM>The only way to do this is to synchronise the installation or use an AM>external application to synchronise the Mail directories for the AM>server and the laptop. this synchro process isn't exactly meeting my needs, or I'm not able

Re: Copying options between profiles

Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 10:35:05 AM, you wrote: GA> Hi GA> I have set up three different mail profiles. Howe can I copy optioons GA> from one to another? I want to have the same reply templates, views GA> etc (e.g. I customised my message list view as far as column go, and I GA> want *e

Fw: Fw: Foxmail

Hello, TBUDL, Third attempt with Foxmail. This program is not quite rfc compliant. It does all kind of illegal things with the address headers. And some smtp-servers are more leniant than others. = = = = = = This is a forward message = = = = = = = Original serder's name:Roelof Otten

Re: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote: TF> But I have antoher question: I have a tray icon with which I can TF> open a window "NOD32 for POP3". the status is "Off". How do I turn TF> it "On"? TF> Also, if I download the TB plug-in for NOD32, do I still need to

Re: when a server is not a server...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ss [S] wrote: S> Reason is dead simple - I have one main PC (the "server") where most S> of the mailing stuff gets done (will be done), but I have another PC S> in the bedroom, on which I would lazy over on Sundays and send mail S> from it rather than

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi rick, @12-Mar-2003, 01:03 -0500 (06:03 UK time) rick [R] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R> AVG is like swiss cheese when it comes to virus protection. Please stop quoting the VB100 report as if they are "the only game in town". This is misleading

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 at 3:59:45 PM you [TF]wrote (at least in part): TF> In any case, I think the current version of not locking files at all TF> is dangerous if two users write to it at the same time. Any TF> application that is networkable should you file locks. This is true

Re: when a server is not a server...

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 03:39, SS wrote: > In any case, what I am interested to do is have a "server" mode Bat > running on a given PC and then 2 more "workstation" connecting to > it, but all being able to see one and the same set of accounts. I'm afraid I cannot help you,

Re: recomend another mailer ?

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 01:53, John Morse wrote: > I tried it again, and yes this list bounces mail from "Foxmail" > Yes, they "bounce" it, even though they claim they don't want > people to have the ability to bounce email from their client. Apart from what Marck said about "t

Copying options between profiles

Hi I have set up three different mail profiles. Howe can I copy optioons from one to another? I want to have the same reply templates, views etc (e.g. I customised my message list view as far as column go, and I want *every* folder to use that, unless otherwise specified). Thanks Graeme E-m