way better than
pinging the gateway from the UE. I’ve opened a ticket with Telrad about it,
we’ll see what they say.
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 4:27 AM
To:
Per the subject line and e-mail contents, Pjay is not even using LTE, but
WiMAX. But that is confusing to me because I thought that WiMAX did not
require a GRE tunnel for L2, but could handle L2 natively. (I have zero
practical experience with WiMAX, though, so I'm probably mistaken.)
I agree
My understanding is that below the threshold, equal time applies. Above the
threshold, equal rate applies. So it's a kind of "have your cake & eat it,
too" approach, rather than being forced to pick one resource allocation
mechanism vs. the other.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [ma
In my experience, it has always taken a variable number of minutes -- sometimes
5 or more -- for the RAN to fine up after a reboot. Even if there is a GPS
lock, it still can take some minutes after that before I see "start RF..."
"Send Start PHY".
It makes testing or tweaking settings on a Com
elrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] 4x4 config?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
It makes testing or tweaking settings on a Compact excruciatingly disruptive
and time-consuming, since virtually every setting requires a full reboot in
ord
y, July 19, 2016 8:01 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] 4x4 config?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Still, 'twould be lovely if moving forward, Telrad engineering could start
working to make settings changes take effect imm
d@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] 4x4 config?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
meaning we would still have to wait for GPS PLL re-lock all over again, etc.
Sounds like you've given a great shot.
Since the GPS is a separate device, is it
Is this offer for free console cables still on the table?
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
John Rock
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:16 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] [SPAM?] Serial-miniusb
Adam,
I
So we were actually supposed to get cables in the box with our EPCs?
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Steve Discher
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 8:20 AM
To: Scott Lambert
Subject: Re: [Telrad] [SPAM?] Serial-min
Wait what huh? What hardware would be used for that? SXT LTE doesn't support
band 42/43. Did you find a USB-based, FCC-certified band 42/43 UE?
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Discher [sdisc...@isp
Matt,
I'm sure Nick is referring to a certain Facebook post, made by a certain
competitor's official FB account, which you yourself responded to a couple of
hours ago, so I'm not sure how you managed to forget about it so soon?
-- Nathan
From: telrad-bou
AlLu.
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 19:55, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> I'm sure Nick is referring to a certain Facebook post, made by a certain
> competitor's official FB account, which you yourself responded to a couple of
> hours ago, so I'm not sure h
PCS sends out an Excel spreadsheet, so it would appear that each vendor has
their own way of generating this data for their customers. We simply re-save
as CSV, and then we have a PHP script that we upload the CSV to which reads in
all of the rows and adds each SIM to an SQL database. We use a
data files
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
I have on my list of things to do adding support in the script to natively read
in the Excel file, allowing us to skip the intermediate CSV export. Just
haven't gotten to it yet.
Sonar wi
I would expect plug in a SIM, power up, etc. as well; however, as far as the
WAN config goes, it does not surprise me that it looks different than the
dual-mode CPE7000. A 255.255.255.255 mask makes way more sense given that all
3GPP including LTE is PPP-based. On the CPE7K, the radio interfac
one seeing this, and should I be concerned?
--
Nathan Anderson
First Step Internet, LLC
nath...@fsr.com
___
Telrad mailing list
Telrad@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
ebate a non-starter anyway.)
Thanks,
--
Nathan Anderson
First Step Internet, LLC
nath...@fsr.com
___
Telrad mailing list
Telrad@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
Don't ask me how I got this; ifconfig results from EPC running 729:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:X errors:0 dropped:
Anybody tried cracking a CPE8K open, for the sole purpose of trying to wire it
to a Compact on the lab bench using coax jumpers, as has been done with
connectorized CPE7K? Recommended/not recommended?
-- Nathan
___
Telrad mailing list
Telrad@wispa.org
admin123
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Dan
Petermann [d...@wyoming.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 3:32 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Password for CPE8000
I have this question too
Good question. I don't see a reset button on these like the CPE7000 has.
Someone should probably ask Telrad. They might have some kind of single-use
password that can be used to get you in so that you can reset it.
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:t
ter the unit is reset to factory default,
you can login using the default password.
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 6:26 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Tel
If you can get 1496-byte packets all the way to the UE's IP through the EPC,
then that shows (interestingly) that S1 traffic from EPC <-> eNB is somehow not
beholden to the MTU as-reported on the S1 VLAN (or on the master interface for
that matter), but that PDN traffic definitely is restricted
n...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Jeremy Austin
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 7:10 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Telrad Digest, Vol 25, Issue 1
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
If you can get 1496-byte packets all the way to the
Of those that have gotten some and have tried them out, what are your
impressions so far?
I just opened a ticket outlining some firmware problems we have run into
(mostly management related stuff), but other than that my impression at this
point is pretty darn positive. RF performance seems to
7000 and it is allot more responsive and has
more detail.
We don't have enough deployed to tell performance yet.
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of
Nat
mance.
Matt Carpenter
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Haha, my ticket included the same (?) 2 issues (radio name gets reset after
reboot, and TR-069 issues; specifically, TR-069 creq port is passed through
instead of intercepted when DMZ enab
What is this 4573 eNB code people are referring to? I was half-expecting a
fall maintenance release to 6.6 like we had with 6.5 last year; is this a
prerelease version of that?
We did have a truly bizarre problem with subframe profile 1, at least with eNB
2616. It performed great most of the
Less-than-perfect trunking of S1 traffic between the Compacts and the EPC can
definitely cause performance issues...we have the scar tissue to prove it. So
I wonder if Justin and Matt are actually talking about different issues, or if
Justin is experiencing both (double whammy). If the backhau
When we had problems with S1 trunking, the primary symptom was as it sounds
like you are describing: TCP performance to LTE UEs got worse the more hops out
on the network you got. Of course, overall total capacity to a particular UE
could be achieved by opening a bajillion parallel TCP sockets,
I believe that max cell radius is determined entirely by the special subframe
(regardless of main subframe profile) and follows this convention:
SSF 0: 39km (absolute max)
SSF 1: 30km
SSF 2: 20km
SSF 3: 10km
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
ispa.org>
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:02 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
I believe that max cell radius is determined entirely by the special subframe
(regardless of main
We definitely used to have this problem. Haven't noticed it in forever, but we
also almost never have an EPC reset event either, ungraceful or otherwise.
(Although it should be noted that I seem to recall that this could happen if
the S1/MME session between a Compact and the EPC was interrupte
is, which is correct?
Could Telrad confirm which is correct?
Thanks
Adam
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:13 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>
S
elrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
Nathan,
We happen to have a few 1100AHx2. Which ports did you have to avoid to resolve
the performance issue? The last two?
Thanks,
Adam
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
To: "telr
spa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Austin
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 1:02 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Which again leaves us at square one as far as expla
I very much doubt it. UEs don't actually have "MAC addresses". MAC address is
an ethernet concept. LTE is not an ethernet-like packet network.
These fixed outdoor UEs from Telrad / Gemtek / KZ have a "MAC address" insofar
as they have an ethernet port on them that is intended for the LAN-side
If it is the Baicells ENB that is dropping the S1 session, then it does seem as
though the issue/blame likely sits with Baicells.
I am curious though: if the standard is a standard is a standard, why a need
for different pricing for non-Telrad ENBs? Shouldn't the EPC licensing/pricing
not dist
..@wispa.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of Telrad digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: BaiCells on 2020 (chris daniels)
2. Re: BaiCells on 2020 (Nathan Anderson)
---
t & Regional GM, North America | Telrad Networks Ltd.
T +1.859.444.1888 |
www.telrad.com<http://www.telrad.com/>
On Dec 5, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
This is the same question I have.
I'd also point out that, right or wrong (and I'
I don't know about the specific answer to your question re: how to get stats
from the ENB. We have just been collecting those stats directly from the CPEs
with our ACS and feeding them into Cacti. Of course, if the connection is *so*
craptastic that you can't probe the CPE directly during one
a.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 12:33 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] ENB CINR stats?
I don't know about the specific answer to your question re: how to get stats
from the ENB. We have just been collecting those stats directly from the CPEs
Behalf Of
Jeremy Austin
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 12:53 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] ENB CINR stats?
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
We never got a satisfactory answer about why this might be the case. We were
just
Does anybody know what it means when an 8K behaves this way?:
1) Powers on
2) All RF/signal LEDs are lit
3) Run LED is blinking
4) There is an ethernet link
5) Nothing else works (doesn't respond to 192.168.254.251 on LAN side, won't
attach to network, etc.)
Before these symptoms occurred, we di
physically (as far as I can tell from a glance). Is there any way
to force a config wipe during bootup? I don't see a depressable button on the
PCB anywhere...
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
the lowest non-zero value you can
specify for "Auto-Rescan Duration" on the "eNB Settings" tab. But the outage
times go up to 15 minutes on 832 even when Preferrend eNB List is not enabled
on a CPE and Auto-Rescan remains set to 0.
Grr,
--
Nathan Anderson
First Ste
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Jeremy Austin
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:12 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Is anybody else out there seeing their CPE80
a point that we definitely
have CPE8Ks experiencing this issue across multiple eNB firmware versions.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:23 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] More
at 2:27 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
It's just an interesting data point that we definitely have CPE8Ks experiencing
this issue across multiple eNB firmware versions.
Interestingly today we have had several 8Ks with issues similar, but possibly
not identical
/ or periods of very slow speeds.
Changing some of the biggest complainers to 8000's seems to have been positive.
Now I read about problems with these, seems to me that problems are deeper than
what CPE is used.
Terry
NETAGO
On Dec 21, 2016 7:09 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr
rad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
but this upload capacity thing is what caused me to try pushing 6.6 out to more
Compacts, even though I have read reports of similar-sounding issues from
ot
consider this when adding the iperf feature.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:14 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
Is it possible to get retransmission rates f
Argh, brain fart:
:%s/bearing/bearer/g
You say potaeto, I say potahto.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:31 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
As a follow-up
Very doubtful the OIDs are the same. Two different manufacturers.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Jesse DuPont
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 9:36 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: [Telrad] Dude Functions & Probe for Telrad UE's
In case t
idn't
see the SINRs budge at all on any of the CPEs. Maybe we are doing something
wrong? The only thing I did to enable it was 'set deployment topology
SingleCarrier4X4TM4', commit, and reboot.
-- Nathan
From: Nathan Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:27 PM
To: telrad@w
on both down and up,
and activated weak UE @ level 2 with the default MCS indexes for level 2. It's
probably too early to tell, but I don't think this is making a signficant
difference.
-- Nathan
From: Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:31 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Su
;mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
[cid:image001.png@01D262E8.FA5ED7A0]
On 12/30/16 10:39 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
Very doubtful the OIDs are the same. Two dif
ggg.
...actually, I take that back. We increased the uplink AMBR value to help
troubleshoot the eNB capacity issues we have been seeing. But that's all.
Ugh. If it isn't one thing...
--
Nathan Anderson
First Step Internet, LLC
nath...@fsr.com
elrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 10:27 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: [Telrad] BreezeWAY EPC spontaneous reboots?
So, we had a new one today. One of our EPCs rebooted itself 4 times within the
span of 90 minutes.
Yes, latest public code leve
some odd issues with an eNB and that was the solution, at least for an
eNB.
The error messages sounds more like confd is trying to start a process with
parameters and its not working.
Matt Carpenter
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Oka
;set deployment topology
SingleCarrier4X4TM4', commit, and reboot.
-- Nathan
From: Nathan Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:27 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>
Subject: RE: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
To be more precise, I should say that a CPE8K that didn't
It's
probably too early to tell, but I don't think this is making a signficant
difference.
-- Nathan
From: Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:31 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>
Subject: RE: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
As a follow-up to the iper
l, but I don't think this is making a signficant
difference.
-- Nathan
From: Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:31 AM
To: telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>
Subject: RE: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
As a follow-up to the iperf bit, there is an "accept" rule at
what are current best practices as of 6.6? With the introduction of weak
UE protection, is it advisable to turn that on and then go back to EqualRate
scheduling?
I have set this particular Compact (30 CPEs) to EqualRate on both down and up,
and activated weak UE @ level 2 with the default MC
eason. We are using external
HSS (RADIUS), so I presume it has something to do with that.
Guess I'll dig through our FreeRADIUS logs and then open a ticket...
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Saturday, December
server), then that would explain why we are getting hit with
this bug and other are not.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 4:10 AM
To: Telrad List
Subject: Re: [Telrad] BreezeWAY EPC spontaneous
esn't matter then why is it there?
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
To: "telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>"
mailto:telrad@wispa.org>>
Sent: 1/2/2017 5:34:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink capacity
I shoul
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Uplink capacity
I give upwhere are you finding this?
Via CLI, via Breezeview, or ?
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
To: "telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wispa.org>"
mailto:telr
I can't seem to change the zoom levels on BreezeVIEW's performance graphs. It
only shows me the last 24 hours. There are controls at the top for "Zoom" but
they are grayed out/disabled.
Is this the case for everybody or am I missing something? Has this not yet
been implemented, and are these
drag across the area you want to zoom
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:14 PM -0500, "Nathan Anderson"
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
I can't seem to change the zoom levels on BreezeVIEW's performance graphs. It
only shows
ll activate the zoom
buttons.
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 8:29 PM
To: Telrad List
Subject: Re: [Telrad] BV KPI zoom
I want to zoom *out*, or change the date range (
03, 2017 9:24 AM
To: Telrad List
Subject: Re: [Telrad] BreezeWAY EPC spontaneous reboots?
Yes, we are only using the built in iHSS of the EPC.
Matt Carpenter
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Okay, after seeing from the console that the AAA
Posted to the list eons ago. :)
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/telrad/2016-May/003014.html
(http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/telrad/attachments/20160530/1ec6d357/attachment-0001.txt)
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Terry Duc
ause we use the
DMZ feature on all deployed LTE CPE and right now enabling the DMZ feature on
the CPE8K firmware completely breaks TR-069 reporting. Telrad is supposedly
working on addressing this.
--
Nathan Anderson
First Step Internet, LLC
nath...@fsr.com
-Original Message-
I'm not sure what band you are deployed in, but there don't seem to be that
many band 43 (3.6) CPE options at this point...
They aren't discontinuing the 7000 are they? Couldn't you just continue to buy
those?
I haven't played with a Baicells CPE, but could that be an option?
The only other t
that will work for you!
http://bectechnologies.net/products/
Thanks—
Henry II
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:38 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] CPE 8000 - SNMP
I'm not sure what ban
and availability. I will let you all know what I find out.
Anthony Will
Broadband Corp
Office 952-215-3812
On 1/20/2017 3:38 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
I'm not sure what band you are deployed in, but there don't seem to be that
many band 43 (3.6) CPE options at this point...
They are
Yes, on some radios. It's been out for a while (support site has the date
posted as December 6).
It fixes a few things (most notably, Device Name changes get remembered).
We have noticed that with any 8K firmware newer than the stock factory 694, if
an 8K CPE gets knocked of the network, it ta
o
> me and I called the BEC group (thanks Henry C.)
>
> From my conversation with the BEC guys. They are oriented towards a custom
> design / support solution. He even mentioned making custom firmware changes
> 10 times in 3 months to accommodate a customer. They are going to get
be nice to *see* the UL MCS, but in theory it should already go a little
higher on the 8000.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
To: "'Adam Moffett'"
mailto:ad...@clarityconnect.com>>;
"telrad@wispa.org&
0
Traffic MCS_UL Index25SubframeBits 0
Traffic MCS_UL Index26SubframeBits 0
Traffic MCS_UL Index27SubframeBits 0
Traffic MCS_UL Index28SubframeBits 0
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:52 PM
Nope, I'm not sure.
I was assuming based on the red highlights when you switch the "UE Category"
option from Cat 4 to Cat 5 on the eNodB Capacity Estimator V2.1.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
To: "'Ada
in particular have had a troubled history when it comes to its copper gig
ports...search for "Ubiquiti AirFiber MikroTik CCR" if you want some fun
afternoon light reading.
Thanks,
--
Nathan Anderson
First Step Internet, LLC
nath...@fsr.com
from BreezeWay?
We also have the Breezeway connected to a CCR 1036. I'm not seeing FCS
errors.
Breezeway port 9 connected to CCR ether4. The CCR ethernet port is all
at default settings.
Breezeway SW version 0606.02151
RouterOS 6.32.3
-- Original Message --
From: "Natha
2017 at 12:37 AM -0700, "Nathan Anderson"
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
We have recently noticed a new problem: we have an access port on our BreezeWay
(in this case, so happens it's the BW's port 10, but may not be relevant) that
is plugged into a MikroTik
than
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 1:29 PM
To: 'Adam Moffett'; telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Ethernet RX FCS errors from BreezeWay?
Interesting; thanks. Ours
re-deployed; ugh
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 1:56 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org; 'Adam Moffett'
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Ethernet RX FCS errors from BreezeWay?
One
ustin
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 7:01 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote:
Which again leaves us at square one as far as explaining what is going on, but
at least we now have a working so
d you more details off list. I should have been clearer; I'm
getting different results when testing iperf on L2 to the EPC management
network vs. L3 to management, even when taking bandwidth delay product into
account.
Thanks... more later.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:08 PM Nathan Anderson
m
en them. So the way we have our network set up may not be an
apples-to-apples comparison with yours.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 7:21 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issu
environment using our spare EPC and ENB (or both).
-- Nathan
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Jeremy Austin
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 8:41 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Nathan Anderson
mailto:nath
UEs less efficiently so that it can make
good on the latency budget?)
I'm curious to know if anyone has tried this.
Thanks,
--
Nathan Anderson
First Step Internet, LLC
nath...@fsr.com
___
Telrad mailing list
Telrad@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
raded to 10G fiber ports and guess what, we get FCS
errors on the freakin' fiber ports as well.
YMMV,
JP
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:37:27 +0000, Nathan Anderson wrote
> We have recently noticed a new problem: we have an access port on
> our BreezeWay (in this case, so happens it's
arer use DSCP 6. Is that
enough, or is there more to it?
I could probably read the manual and figure this out, but I was just
stabbing at it in my spare time :)
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson"
To: "telrad@wispa.org"
Sent: 1/31/2017 3:20:34 PM
Subjec
...also, you must not use 24GHz Airfibers. ;-)
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:00 PM
To: telrad@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Ethernet RX FCS errors from
The single-port method is what Telrad recommends for centralized EPC
deployments, and multi-port is (the way I read the docs) only
recommended/intended for EPC-at-each-site deployments. (You can make it work
with centralized EPC, but there are many indicators that this feature was never
intend
scription by the
way. It never sat right with me, but I don't have an objective reason to not
like it.
Personally I'm going to populate the SFP+ slot and use a single 10G fiber.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
rence. When there is congestion I
think you'd see less throughput on individual TCP connectionsthough maybe
you would see lower RTT as well, and total system throughput might not be
affected. I am literally making that up, so take it for what it's worth LOL.
-- Original Mess
list too
I'm having the same confusion for the exact same reason.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nathan Anderson" mailto:nath...@fsr.com>>
To: "'Adam Moffett'"
mailto:ad...@clarityconnect.com>>;
"telrad@wispa.org<mailto:telrad@wisp
Adam & Jeremy,
We are facing similar issues. I know that Telrad is aware of uplink
performance issues, and Nick said in a post here a couple of weeks ago that
they are working to address this in the next 6.6 maintenance release, and that
beta testing starts this week.
-- Nathan
From: telrad-
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
