DAVEH: O...I rather like the way you put that, Terry!
Thanx for contributing to the discussion.
Terry Clifton wrote:
Let me throw my two cents worth in here guys. A Christian is one who
is not only willing to die for Christ. A Christian is also willing to
live for Christ,
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Jt, also I
have learned that when a
certain mormon fellow (to remain unnamed) asks us to define anything it
is to
get us squabbling about definitions amongst ourselves;
DAVEH: ??? Are you suggesting I'm the author of confusion in this
Forum? While
David Miller wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
... some tend to want to take a very narrow
view in an effort to exclude others from their
club, so to speak. I am rather amused that
most of those wishing to adopt a very strict
definition are usually unwilling to share that
definition.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Hello Dave
Please explain.You left me out in the cold on this one.
How are the Qoutes from the Prophets and General Authorities out
of CONTEXT?
I just don't see it maybe you could help me.
Please provide exampleS
DAVEH: Here is a quote...
This Church is
Slade Henson wrote:
Sorry, Dave, but we don't celebrate
Christmas. The next Holy day coming up is Passoverwould you like to
attend our family Seder?
DAVEH: H.That is tempting, Kay. Would you like me
to bring a Kosher ham? ;-)
Kay
DAVEH:
Though I
I get ridiculed no matter what I say John so - No
worries! I'm just praisin' the Lord and feeding on His Word.
If G prefers Calvin's words and wants to be conformed
to Calvin's image rather than Christs, what can I say?.
It's his God given choice - and we do become like our
teacher. jt
On
A whole bunch of people will be saved via the gracious consideration of the
Lord. A whole bunch more will be lost, choosing to serve the created rather than the Creator.
JD
Which
is S-I-N. Izzy
I had Romans 1:25 in mind. What had you in mind?
JD
That works. We are the
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005
11:49 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Bill says
goodbye?
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:19:28 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005
11:53 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Good
News!
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:28:28 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005
11:54 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is a
Christian?
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:31:39 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005
11:55 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Good
News!
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:35:05 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005
12:14 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
In a message dated 1/14/2005 9:21:00 PM
Well, don't you want ALL of the TT'ers to show up??? :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 12:22 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
DAVEH:
Id say your definition of a
mormon is definitely NOT the same definition of who is a true Christian.
DAVEH: I'm not sure why would you expect it to be
so.
I didnt.
Thanks, DaveH. Izzy
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:40:56 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
JD: We are
saved by grace throught faith apart from our working of the Law.
Our/His faith is reckoned as if it were personal
righteousness--and we are saved, in part,because of that
consideration on
Izzy in blue:
Yes and thanks. Wouldn't you say that salvation by grace through
faith has always been the will of the Lord? If what we see as
Divine Projections (such as Christ dying for our sins at a certain time)
is, in fact, God's reality, then salvation based upon the condition of
the
Slade, I agree that DaveH
is a kindly person of exemplary mannershis words are always
loving. However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning
religion?
DAVEH: Are you serious..Do you really believe
I'm evangelizing on TT, Izzy?
Yes, if the opportunity
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Jt, also I have learned that when a certain
mormon fellow (to remain unnamed) asks us to define anything it is to get us
squabbling about definitions amongst ourselves;
DAVEH: ??? Are you suggesting I'm
the author of confusion in this Forum? While I may wish I
JD: We are saved by grace throught faith
apart from our working of the Law. Our/His
faith is reckoned as if it were personal righteousness--and
we are saved, in part,because of that consideration on the part of
God.Few - many? Well, I believe scripture, Linda.A
whole bunch of
JD writes: Wouldn't you say that salvation by grace through
faith has always been the will of the Lord?
jt: My belief is thatGod would have preferred for
Adam to have stayed "in His image" and fellowshipped with Him in the garden
daily
but since that didn't happen, he went to Plan
B.
If
Ahturkey ham...GREAT! :) I'm not one for matzah ball soup, but I can
make it.
We
usually have lamb, matzah ball soup, salmon, and other items...it's a feast for
sure...
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave
DAVEH: Most of the early members of the LDS Church were Protestants,
so they did have a Protestant flavor, so to speak. But we don't view that
as being the same as the Church being Protestant. We weren't
protesting the RCC folks as such.
[Debbie]Iwas always taught at home that we weren't
They
weren't saved by obeying the Mosaic law, Judy. They were saved by FAITH. The
same way as usFAITH. No one was EVER saved by obeying the law, nor will
anyone ever BE. The law is simply God's rules for His people...or those who
claim to be His people...on how they should live a Holy
[Debbie]Wow, John, this post of yours gave me
goosebumps.
Imagine this; God creates
mankind. He wants this creation to love Him, to seek Him out, to
prefer Him. And He accomplishes this by seeking us out, walking in
the garden, talking to Abraham -- planning his future, making
a military
[Debbie] BTW, the rest of my response to John's post is at the bottom. In
case people didn't scroll down all the way the first time.
-Original Message-From: Debbie Sawczak
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 9:39
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject:
If you don't mind, I'll do the David Miller thing and start a thread
based upon someone else's writing
Judy
Taylor, who really should have been resting her weary bones in bed,said
the following on Friday, 14 January, 2005
01.53
...you have your own private
interpretation...
What,
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:15:27 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
They
weren't saved by obeying the Mosaic law, Judy. They were saved by FAITH. The
same way as usFAITH. No one was EVER saved by obeying the law, nor will
anyone ever BE. The law is simply God's rules
If you will send me my quote in the balance and context
I wrote it in Slade- I will be glad to oblige. judyt
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:45:43 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If you don't mind, I'll do the David Miller thing and
start a thread based upon someone else's
Perhaps you should allow Christ in your OWN life so that JUDY can be
conformed to His Image. I am tired of your consistently demeaning posts. This is
not Christlike behavior. Leave your piss and vinegar elsewhere please. Messiah
never behaved like you are with people ho were genuinely
Gary wrote:
'sacrifices' are repeated efforts implicitly imperfect..
however, that such efforts are 'not perfect' does not
equate literarily to 'totally ineffectual'
Judy wrote:
Have it your way G
Gary does have a point here, Judy. You both do.
As you point out, Heb. 9:9 says that the
DAVEH wrote:
HeyI vote for the Great Northwest
If you all want to come to Oregon, I'll host it! :-)
If you are serious, Dave,I am interested in exploring this
idea. Is anybody else interested?
Peace be with you.David Miller.
Slade, my heart is not to demean anyone and I don't
know what you mean by "piss and vinegar" as this term
is not in my vocabulary. Please explain to
mehow scripture and history demeans people. Are you
thinking
thatMessiah maybe
softened things up a little to keep from hurting people's
They
didn't exercise their faith by keeping the law. They exercised their LOVE for
God and their obedience to Him by obeying the law.
Christ
Himself obeyed the law.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Slade,
I agree that DaveH
is a kindly person of exemplary mannershis words are always
loving. However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning
religion?
DAVEH: Are you
serious..Do you really believe
I'm evangelizing on TT, Izzy?
Not in
going to Oregon with five small children. WAY too far. It's over 3,000
miles.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David
MillerSent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 10.05To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject:
Slade wrote:
Sadly, some people will say that the saints in the Older
Testament exercised their faith by keeping the Mosaic
Law while we [the Renewed Covenant saints] exercise
ours by obedience to Christ
I think you have to be careful not to project your approach to the law as
being the same
Main Entry:
piss and vinegar
Part of Speech:
noun
Definition:
vigor and aggressive
energy
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 10.07To:
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Well, don't you want ALL of the TT'ers to show up??? :-) Izzy
DAVEH: Sure I do, Izzy. But I prefer they join in the feast, rather
than make me the sacrificial lamb!
:-)
DAVEH: HThat's an interesting idea, Blaine. But..I
suppose if we did
DAVEH: Hmmm..Let me run it by my wife. I originally
suggested it as a joke, but might be viable. The main problem is that
we are hardly centrally located!
BTWI almost missed this one, as it got inadvertently
filtered into my SPAM folder! As far as I know, that's the first
Thanks for taking the time to send the definition Kay;
so Slade wants me to leave my vigor and aggressive
energy elsewhere? Would he rather I were
"lukewarm or cold?" How is it so unmerciful to deal withthe
truth?
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:27:37 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
One of the most consistently
frustrating things about Christians is that we seem far more keen on making sure
everyone around us is properly beat over the head with the truth, often with
bile and anger, than in living out the life exemplified by Christ, with mercy
and love. Look at the
Judy wrote:
The Spirit and Word work simultaneously which is what
we see in Acts and all of the Epistles so we would need
more than John 6:44 to construct a wooing doctrine.
I agree that the Spirit and the Word work simultaneously, but many people
have recognized that they were prepared to
Well Kay, as you say we see things very differently
because I can read Hebrews 11 which is the faith Chapter and find all of the
Patriarchsin it including Moses ie "By faith Moses when he was come to
years, refused to be called the son of Pharoah's daughter choosing rather to
suffer
myth (my studies involve/d Calvin
and Luthers' perceptions of Christ himself;thematerial implication
of jt's perspective, below,is rootd in self servgcult
ideology)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:00:40 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[(If)] G prefers Calvin's words
and wants to
myth (head and
heart)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:06:30 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my heart is not to demean
anyone
In a message dated 1/15/2005 3:06:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get ridiculed no matter what I say John so
This is not the case, Judy -- at least not by me or Bill -- two of your favoite digs. When we come back on you, it is simply out of frustration with your harang.
In a message dated 1/15/2005 4:26:57 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That works. We are the created in that case. We are serving ourselves; not God. That is sin. Izzy
There you go.
J
In a message dated 1/15/2005 4:29:09 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keep in mind I havent (and never will) stoop to calling someone a prick or an idiot. You can smear me all you want, JD, but Im not down to that level. Why dont you get off my back? Does it make you feel
Within the last few days, several have taken it upon themselves to
communicate through the use of vile language. I realize that people have
different ideas of right and wrong when it comes to language. Nevertheless,
being that this is a discussion list that has some individuals on it who do
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Kay,
Kay (to DaveH): Why not? Aren't you Mormon? Who better to ask than a
Mormon. I would think
you would know what you believe or don't believe, etc. way better than I
would.
Kay, there is a dynamic at play when Mormons speak, of which you
might not be aware, and
myth [neither of you are
more interestd than, e.g., John Calvin in Christ; e.g., in your era neither of
you demonstrateanymeasurable positive influence on your
owntown let alone upon unknown nations in the eras to come; however, you
both reflecthigh degrees of contemporary holier than
In a message dated 1/15/2005 4:50:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reread this and see if there might be anything in it you would change if you were speaking to Christ, Himself.
J
Are you equating the two? Jesus sees perfectly fine. Izzy
Have it yoour way, Linda.
'myth' ain't
vile??
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:33:19 -0500
"David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Within the last few days,
several have taken it upon themselves to communicate through the use of
vile language.
||
[']bullshit[']
I really think the post below is as well written as I can put it. No need for me to respond. Either you have a heart for that message or you don't JD
In a message dated 1/15/2005 4:50:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzy in blue:
Yes and thanks. Wouldn't you say that
Your post (that you could have remembered
writingeasier than me retrieving it)is attached to this
email.
So we don't begin with a rabbit trail,What is
your definition of Private
Interpretation.
From: Judy TaylorSent:
Saturday, 15 January, 2005 09.52Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private
Thank you for stating your opinion.
slade
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 10.28
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology
Slade wrote:
Sadly, some
In a message dated 1/15/2005 5:27:44 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: What does "saved by grace through faith" look like?
Abraham is given as our example of one who had saving faith the kind that is reckoned as righteousness - but Abraham also passed the ultimate test.
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gary
wrote:'sacrifices' are repeated efforts implicitly imperfect..however, that
such efforts are 'not perfect' does not equate literarily to 'totally
ineffectual'
Judy wrote:Have it your way "G"
Gary does have a point here, Judy. You both do.
As you
Judy wrote:
... so little interest in God's Word.
DavidM:
You are quite right about this.
Gary wrote:
myth [neither of you are more interestd than,
e.g., John Calvin in Christ;
You yanked our comments out of context. I did not have Calvin in mind. I
had some of the people on this list in
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:52:55 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never have said thatsay they were 'totally
ineffectual' or 'worthless'
myth (what's pt A?)
v
jtwrites (~Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:29:59
-0500):
||
[A.] the blood of bulls and goats could do
nothing
myth (Calvin was merely an
example in my post--re-fuelgand embellishing jt's cultic ignorance in your
postsis not a gift of the HS)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:02:31 -0500
"David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You yanked our comments out of
context.
Judy wrote:
I don't understand most of what Gary writes and don't
see the need for this one since I never have said that
say they were 'totally ineffectual' or 'worthless' God
told Moses to do it and He set that system up for a
reason. Gary reads things into my posts that I don't
say ...
I
think this may be the first part of a couple of posts. I've got to get to work
on my Talmud paper. (Oops... did I say a bad word??)
Contrary to popular belief, not all sacrifices were for the individual to
get right with G-d. Neither did the sacrifices "cover" sin. Even in the Newer
DAVEH: I just want to acknowledge your post, DavidM. I do appreciate
hearing your perspective on this.
While your argument does make sense, how do you explain that judges
would have been originally construed to be gods? Why not
just leave it as judges, or perhaps use another word? (I think
If you
don't understand most of what Gary says, how can you accuse him of reading
things into your posts?
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 11.53To:
The original post is an object lesson in"private
interpretation"
God's Word clearly and plainly says: "SIN
IS LAWLESSNESS" (1 John 3:4)
John says it's not and tells me that I don't have a
clue as to the practice of lawlessness so here is a
contradiction.
I choose to believeGod's Word and
THANK
YOU, JD!
Neither is there a PlanC (Moses) nor a Plan D
(Jesus).
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005
12.03To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
In a message dated 1/15/2005 4:34:21 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Soo, John got the word wrong? You have a grammatical reason for saying this? You have a reason at all for saying this? Seriously. I see no reason for the need on your part to 1) disagree with what
jeff in red
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005
10:40
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Good News!
Thanks for taking the time to send the definition
Kay; so
I disagree with all of your opinions as well as the taboo nature of the
idiom piss an vinegar. However, I agree with the Biblical quote you gave
of 1 Cor 8:9. This is the only opinion you stated that supports the
restraint of certain words and phrases.
-- slade
-Original Message-
From:
DAVEH: Welcome to TT, Greg. It's nice to hear somebody using an
apocryphal source!;-)
Gregory A. Hession J.D. wrote:
The entire book of Jamesis
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find
Gary scripture says it, it is not my personal
opinion...
Hebrews 9:9 Which was a fiture for the time then
present in which wee offered both gifts and sacrifices
"that could not make him that did
the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience"
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:04:31 -0700
God had already experienced rebellion with the angels
ie Lucifer and 1/3 of them fell; anytime you create
something with a free will this is the chance you take
and apparently God was willing to do it again in spite
of knowing the outcome beforehand.
jht
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:02:57 EST
Well Judy, I just said that you were mean.
your first response to Greg is exactly what I meant.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005
11:21
Subject: Re:
Actually, I didn't say (or write) the word you quote below, which I know
is a quote from David M.
K.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005
11.42To:
Thanks for your 2 cents Jeff, I'll have to pray about
learning from your example.
Grace and Peace,
Judy
jeff in red
From: Judy Taylor
Thanks for taking the time
to send the definition Kay; so Slade wants me to leave my vigor and
aggressive energy elsewhere? Would he
I confess that I don't read most of them because they
are incomprehensible but when I do
or when he is quoted such as 'below' this hasbeen
so? jht
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:15:22 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If
you don't understand most of what Gary says, how can you
myth whilemissg the point
of scripturerefusgvalid guidance
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:27:36 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary scripture says it, it is not my personal
opinion...
Hebrews 9:9 Which was a fiture for the time then
present in which wee offered both gifts
when was it--what is
'experience'?
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
God had already experienced
rebellion
Where
does it say that 1/3 of the angels fell?
--
slade
-Original Message-From: Judy TaylorSent:
Saturday, 15 January, 2005 12.22Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology
God had already experienced rebellion with the angels
ie Lucifer and 1/3 of them
Are
you saying that you were not alluding to 2 Peter 1:20? If you
were alluding to it, please define what you believe the passage refers
to.
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15 January,
interestG
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:35:47 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Actually, I didn't say (or write) the word you quote below, which I
know is a quote from David M.
K.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
myth ('speech' is v
revealing)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:29:52 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't read most of them because they
are incomprehensible
myth (who wouldvalue Jeff's
while disparaging John Calvin's?)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:54 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your 2 cents Jeff, I'll have to pray about
learning from your example.
Grace and Peace,
Judy
jeff in red
||
Yes I did allude to 2 Peter 1:20 because my belief is
that "all scripture is given by inspiration of God" so this
would include 1 John 3:4
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:46:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Are
you saying that you were not alluding to 2 Peter 1:20? If you
Revelation 12:4
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:43:24 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Where does it say that 1/3 of the angels fell?
--
slade
-Original Message-From: Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 12.22Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Piss and Vinegar? come on David are you really that much of an uptight
prude?
Maybe you should visit the brick testament! http://thebricktestament.com
Jeff
Life makes warriors of us all.
To emerge the victors, we must arm
ourselves with the most potent of weapons.
That weapon is prayer.
I like
this post. However, Milton may have written good poetry, but wasn't he unusually
cruel/abusive to his daughters?
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005
11.35To:
perhaps..but where did
theobservation originate?
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:59:37 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I
like this post. However, Milton may have written good poetry, but wasn't he
unusually cruel/abusive to his daughters?
--
slade
-Original
And his tail sweeps
awaya third of the stars of heavenand
throws them to the earth.And the dragon stood
before the womanwho was about to give birth,so that when she gave
birthhe might devour her child.
(Revelation 12:4)
Again, I ask Where does it
say 1/3 of the angels fell?
Great.
How does one interpret privately and how does one do it
correctly?
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 12.53To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
Where
did the cruelty originate?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005
13.09To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Good News!
perhaps..but where did
myth (God's truth is germane to
human 'wisdom')
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:58:15 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
People
are abandoning God's truth to embrace human "wisdom."
DAVEH: From my LDS perspective, I would say so.
How do you see it, Kevin?
Kevin Deegan wrote:
DaveH
Question was Abraham a Christian?
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six
Right there Slade, if you don't have time to stop your
talmud studies and search this out
thenpray and ask the Lord about it later..
jht.
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:11:54 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
And his tail sweeps
awaya third of the stars of heavenand
throws
no, whr did the
'observation' originate..from whom originally..when..why..if you want
to, think about it and post usa trail to wander:)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:16:13 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Where did the cruelty originate?
-Original Message-From:
not literal stars??
interestG
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:22:17 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a third of the
stars of heaven
DaveH,
But when LDS use it, they mean 2 gods and a spirit.
DAVEH: That is a bit misleading, Perry. We also consider the HS to be a
God, though one without a physical body.
Okay, the LDS interpret the Godhead as 3 separate gods...sorry to mislead
you!
And, if you are a woman, you do not get
DaveH, how many prophets have there been, Joseph Smith to today, and how
many of them, other than Joseph Smith, have received revelation directly
from the LDS god? Those would be found in the DC, right?
Perry
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Exactly what I thought. It doesn't. I wasn't asking for an
allusion.
slade
P.S
Your lack of love continues to shine through with EACH of your posts.
Congrats.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, 15
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
