DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my posts, Perry.
I'm not talking about your sexual experiences. I'm talking about
Christian hypocrisy and the double standard as practiced on TT. Is the
double standard on TT not a fair topic? Why should I have to discuss
that matter offline?
Dave, lets take this offline, okay?
DAVEH: Why take it offline, Perry? When you and Kevin chide Mormons
for not wanting to discuss Temple things online, you seem to recognize
no level of respect for my sacred beliefs. Now you make what I have
considered to be your sexually charged
Terry:I believe that YOU FAIL THE LEAST ON THIS.
You raised an important point when speaking of not knowing one's self. IMO,
those who believe themselves to be WITHOUT SIN do not!
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December
Am I misunderstanding you: do you
find something appalling and anti-Semitic in John's
synopsis?
Bill
-Original Message-From:
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgDate:
Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:26
Thanks Terry. Well stated and very insightful.
Thanks for the honesty check.
Bill
-Original Message-From:
Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgDate:
Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:21 PMSubject: Re:
This is quite rich coming from one who consistently
maintains that noone can know anything anyway. I guess
you are the only one around here with a valid opinion
now Lance (according to you that is) and from what I read
you don't believe there is any such thing as "objective
truth" anyway so
Tel him about the PRICE paid in the Garden Dave.Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The cross, to the Christian, is a reminder of the tremendous price that Jesus paidDAVEH: Which price is torturous pain, suffering and death. That is exactly what the cross represents, is that not correct
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/13/2005 6:00:50 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Hmmm, JD is right, denigrating the symbols of another's religious beliefs was wrong. I apologize--apparently I offended JD, although I did so unthinkingly and
LOLhave you quit beating your wife?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You OFFEND Jesus ChristDAVEH: Do you suppose the same could be said of those idolizing crosses?Kevin Deegan wrote: You OFFEND Jesus ChristI almost thought you were serious in your Apology tillNow, if I
So you find it WEIRD too Do you hate the cross also?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *EXACTLY what he finds weird.*DAVEH: WWJD.Have you ever wondered if Jesus feels like..._/I will cling to the old rugged cross/_.again.ordo you think he wants to be
You can make up any sort of feelings you want but the scriptures already tell us Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.He despised the
those who believe themselves to be WITHOUT SIN Are there Christian perfectionists on TT?All those that are WITHOUT SIN raise your hands Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Terry:I believe that YOU FAIL THE LEAST ON THIS. You raised an important point when speaking of not knowing one's
cd: It is my opinion that mormons are big crybabies-and I have no idea what you are refering to-as you accuse others of the very thing you yourself are doing.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 12/14/2005 2:03:00 AM
Subject: Re:
Kevin: Did you not know that there are CHRISTIAN
PERFECTIONISTS on TT? They are three in number. I shan't ask them to identify
themselves as that might exhibit pride and...well..you get it...
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
And let's add those who believe they are HONEST yet are
only willing to see the other guys faults .
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:22:33 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
those who believe themselves to be WITHOUT SIN
Are there Christian perfectionists on TT?All those that
Why don't the moderator(s) (plural?) set up some
sort of a code of conduct with respect to our mutual engagement? IMO, there
exists a double standard with respect to them and us. We, or so it would appear,
are entitled to SLANDER THEM (Mormons being the 'bad' guys) but, they are not
able to
Cats are out of the bag. It was just obvious from
reading them, wasn't it?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 07:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Beams and
Motes
Gary Bill JD?
WOW I never
No, Judy!! I lied!! There is but ONE, and, IT IS
ME" There, I've said it and, I'm proud to have done so!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 07:33
Subject: Re:
Judy:Speaking only for myself. My faults are ever
before me. IFF they are ever before ME then, it follows that they are ever
before the Lord and, even you.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Blaine what is all this Talk about PAYING for SINS in the GARDEN? And what is this great drops of Blood sweat thing have to do with Atonement?"The Savior ATONED for our sins by suffering in Gethsemane and by giving his life on the cross. It is impossible for us to fully understand how he
Doesn't this make you one? For you must be W/O sin to cast this stoneLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin: Did you not know that there are CHRISTIAN PERFECTIONISTS on TT? They are three in number. I shan't ask them to identify themselves as that might exhibit pride and...well..you get
THE VICARIOUS HUMANITY OF CHRIST WOULD MOST
ASSUREDLY INCLUDE THE GARDEN, kevin!
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 07:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Garden
Atonement
Blaine what is all this Talk
We should make accusing each other personally a
matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations to be both
discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or
not?
Why give the enemy a platform to tear each
other down.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:01:13 -0800 Dave Hansen
I've answered this in a subsequent
post.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 07:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Beams and
Motes
Doesn't this make you one? For you must be W/O sin to cast
this
When you describe that which you say as THE TRUTH
OF THE WORD OF GOD Judy, while that spoken by another as OTHER THAN the truth of
the word of god, Judy then, you are doing the very thing that you speak of as
'both discouraging and wearying'. Would you not acknowledge this to be the
case?
DAVEH: Do you suppose the same could be said of those idolizing crosses? All these years on TT and we are just now learning how you really feel about the Cross. How can that be? Have you been shielding us from certain "Truths" because we are Not worthy nor Ready for the Meat of the word? Is it
I see. Is this then the sin of the parents, or the world, or the
parson with low esteem?
How would this condition add to or subtract from one's ability to do
what Jesus suggests in the sermon on the mount? I am too lazy to look
it up but it seems to me that He came to town meek and lowly,
You are entitled to your OPINION Since "WE" slandered them Why don't "YOU" Apologize?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't the moderator(s) (plural?) set up some sort of a code of conduct with respect to our mutual engagement? IMO, there exists a double standard with respect to
In a national cemetery, Dave, you will see the cross over those who
claimed to be Christians and a star of David over those who were
Jewish. As I pointed out before, many people claim to be Christians
who are not. They are wannabees who have the desire but not the
faith. The cross does not
The WHAT?ROTFLLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE VICARIOUS HUMANITY OF CHRIST WOULD MOST ASSUREDLY INCLUDE THE GARDEN, kevin!- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: December 14, 2005 07:46 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Garden
JUDY:Am I being unclear? (I often am). Let me take
another run at it.
On those occasions in which you indicate that
you've CORRECTLY APPREHENDED THE MEANING OF GOD'S WORD(s) on given issue, do you
not implicitly or explictly indicate that the one(s) with whom you are speaking
do not?
There are two on TT who regularly write reflecting
humility. I'm suspect of one of them but, that's because I don't,
perhaps.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:14
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Beams and
Please pick yourself up from the floor then, let me
know that what I wrote is not understood by you, should this be the
case.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:30
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Garden
If you think this to be little more than funny, you know no more about
the old rugged cross than does our friend, Blaine.
jd
-- Original message --
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The WHAT?
ROTFL
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list is called Truth Talk Lance. It is not all
about your opinions orme.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:51:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me attempt something, Judy. WITH WHAT
FREQUENCY THEN, DO YOU EXHIBIT THIS 'TRUE HIMILITY'?
From: Judy Taylor
True
YOUR OPINIONS re: the MEANING OF THE SCRIPTURES YOU
CITE ARE WHAT, IMO, I AND OTHERS READ MOST OF THE TIME. I can live with that.
Can you?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December
The unitythat is shared by these
individuals is found in theirhigh regard for the Word and their
commitment to a living Christ.those two considerations are bigger
than all their differing theologies.
Very well said, John.
Terry
But apparently it leaves us bereft in our own personal
mess at least in your economy Lance since
you are wanting to allude to and/or point out or at
least have others confess their own sinon TT ...
For what purpose?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:49:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some rarely rise above SILLY! Are you not cognizant
of the fact that that's their perception as well? (Dean Charles included
in this!)
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
SOK, Judith, I have every confidence that you
don't
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Garden
Atonement
Just what is the
I just checked out the definition of 'foolish'. B4
Torrance Kevin, it 'the vicarious humanity of Christ' was present throughout
Scripture.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:38
Subject: Re:
Possibly any or all of what you mention and yes it does
keep one from wholeheartedly laying down their life for
others and causesthe heart to be less than
pure. I'm sure a lot of the behaviors you observed as a prison
guard
were the result of these kinds of issues. The
enemyover the years
Just what is the "direct question" Lance? I don't
recall you ever being direct about anything.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:45:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW (not much, say many), you are as elusive as
the Mormons when it comes to a direct replay to a direct question.
True humility Lance is saying what God says about a
situation or subject; personal opinion, even
while grovelling while saying it is inverted
pride. When a preacher gets out there with a megaphone
and accurately speaks the oracles of God .. that is
true humility. Or of one speaks them to a
Let me attempt something, Judy. WITH WHAT FREQUENCY
THEN, DO YOU EXHIBIT THIS 'TRUE HIMILITY'?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:45
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
FWIW (not much, say many), you are as elusive as
the Mormons when it comes to a direct replay to a direct question. 'Slip slidin'
away'
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14,
I don't agree but then I'm sure this is no news to
you.
When I cite scripture - you either receive it by faith
as God's Word or you read it as a dead letter
depending on what you have going on in your own
heart. Truth is apprehended by faith whereas
IMO you are more attuned to human reason.
Where was this B4 Torrance? This explains a lot about your postmodern Psychiatry/Anthropology you call a "theology"Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THE VICARIOUS HUMANITY OF CHRIST WOULD MOST ASSUREDLY INCLUDE THE GARDEN, kevin!- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan
"If God can be
understood and comprehended by any of our humans means,
then I cannot worship
Him. One thing is sure. I will never bend my knees and
say "Holy, holy, holy," to
that which I have been able to decipher and figure out
in my own
mind!"
False theology is man centric it comes forth from man's thoughts man's experience and therefore naturally becomes Psych/Anthro True Theology is what has been revealed by the Mind of GodLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just checked out the definition of 'foolish'. B4 Torrance Kevin, it
God can always speak through His Word and it does
not return void. On the other matter, as you already know, you, David and I see
things somewhat differently. It may indeed be due to my own poor communication
skills.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
This list is called Truth Talk Lance. It is not all about your opinions orme.OR Lance's opinions OF you and others! that is a different list called People talkJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This list is called Truth Talk Lance. It is not all about your opinions orme.On Wed,
Tel him about the PRICE paid in the Garden Dave.
DAVEH: It does seem to be a big one, considering it pained our Lord
so much that he bled from every pore. Do you disagree, Kevin?
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Tel him about the PRICE paid in the Garden
Dave.
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean the old rugged torrance?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you think this to be little more than funny, you know no more about the "old rugged cross" than does our friend, Blaine.jd-- Original message --From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The WHAT? ROTFL
Lance, I honestly do not know what you see or what you
believe other than the theologians
you approve and a list of other professing
Christianswho are orthodox and see things similarly.
As for David, Kevin, Izzy, Terry, Dean et al. We
may not get every detail exact but so far as I can
tell
But the fact remains that mormons
don't like the cross
DAVEH: I don't think you quite
understand the LDS perspective, Dean. It is not a matter of us not liking the cross,
but rather it is more an understanding of what the cross did to our
beloved Savior. It is similar in a sense to the great
Should I happen to cite the Matthean geneaology in
support of some unrelated matter, it'd be GOD'S WORD TO BE SURE, JUDY BUTYou
do attempt to connect the citation to the matter at hand, do you not?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
Is it good to be calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting
the Moderator? Where do you think this kind ofattitudeleads??
DAVEH: The truth.
Judy Taylor wrote:
No Lance, I wouldn't acknowledge this to
be the case because everything that is spoken on TT is not the
Word
If you haven't noticed so far Lance, what good would it
do me to try to explain at this late date?
Guess this is why the prophets always said "Let him who
has ears to hear."
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:00:39 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I happen to cite the Matthean
I don't think so DaveH, the Truth is a person -
who they hungon a tree for telling it like it is.
So what is new under the
sun?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:07:54 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it good to be calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting the
Judy: Once again, Amen Amen!
PS: The Person the book are not one and the
same!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 10:14
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT Double
PPS: Yes they are... Just as you and your word
are one and the same.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:20:47 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy: Once again, Amen Amen!
PS: The Person the book are not one and the
same!
From: Judy Taylor
I don't think so DaveH,
You really don't get it do you? If I were to
criticize your beliefs then, I am criticizing your person and, vice versa. Kevin
et al do the same with the Mormons.
I've asked you previously. I shall ask you once
again. Is there a great gulf between who you are and what you say (believe)?
Ignorance, thy name is Judy!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 10:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Beams and
Motes
You say the words Lance but your actions say
You really don't get it do you? If I were to criticize your
beliefs then, I am criticizing your person
No you wouldn't be because you don't know my
person. What you are talking about is religious/racial
bigotry
which is a misnomer. It is possible to love the
person and reject their belief.
Actually ignorance is a form of knowledge
And since God's Word is the wisdom that comes
from above and you are the one with the human
theological mediators ... I would say your observation is more true foryou
Lance.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:37:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPPSSS: Jesus is God the Word and the Bible is
(our record of) His spoken Word and our
present day measure of
Truth.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:50:18 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PPSS:I was distinguishing between the Person of
Christ and the Bible NOT the Person of Christ
I will ponder such as I gaze out upon the waters The Sunset was quite beautiful last night over lake ErieLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OR YOUR OPINIONS OF BLAINE DAVEH THAT'S CALLED ANTI MORMONISM!! Come to think of it, Kevin, this so-called anti-Mormon kick you're on seems to be
considering it pained our Lord so much that he bled from every poreYou force your Interpretation into the Plain meaning of the scriptures LU 22:44 And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.Dave Hansen [EMAIL
See, case in point, Lance's Semi Private "PEOPLE TALK" networkLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OR YOUR OPINIONS OF BLAINE DAVEH THAT'S CALLED ANTI MORMONISM!! Come to think of it, Kevin, this so-called anti-Mormon kick you're on seems to be about all you've got goin' for ya..-
rather it is more an understanding of what the cross did Is this from a PERSONAL REVELATION DH?The pain caused by the Lord as he was tortured on the cross however, was caused by his enemies. He bore our sins. By the Cross he RECONCILED His Enemies unto Himself. His enemies are not those
Let's take a vote whoever has the most votes has TRUTH!Or are you on your THEOLOGY of APOLOGY kick again?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perry, Dean, Kevin et al certainly GIVE offence vis a vis Mormonism. Do you, the Mormon contingent on TT, take offence at what's said by them?
Kevin, this so-called anti-Mormon kick you're on seems to be about all you've got goin' for ya..Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perry, Dean, Kevin et al certainly GIVE offence vis a vis Mormonism. Do you, the Mormon contingent on TT, take offence at what's said by them?
Yahoo!
You wear your beliefs on your sleve!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You really don't get it do you? If I were to criticize your beliefs then, I am criticizing your personNo you wouldn't be because you don't know my person. What you are talking about is religious/racial bigotry which
Youll have to ask the LordHe
hasnt convicted me of anything on my last 20 posts as yet. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005
8:22 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Beams and
You really don't get it do you? If I were to criticize your beliefs then, I am criticizing your personOK so we should not criticize beliefs. But criticizing the person is OK in your book Good ol Self Refutin Lance...Kevin, this so-called anti-Mormon kick you're on seems to be about all
I, for one, have no difficulty at all criticizing
the'deceived' as you put it, Judy. The difficulty is that some who are, in
reality deceived, believe themselves to be 'in the truth' do they
not?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Every deceived person believes themselves to be
"in the truth"
Deceived people don't know they are deceived -
this is the nature of the beast.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:43:47 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I, for one, have no difficulty at all criticizing
the'deceived' as
That, Judy, is what I've been attempting to say,
apparently with minimal success.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 13:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Beams and
Funny thing, Judy, I've always though of you as
your own 'FANCY THEOLOGIAN'. Over time one cannot but note that others have
thought similarly. The 'Judy theology' is generally well researched and, on the
whole, readable.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
Actually ignorance is a form of knowledge I have thought all along that this was a viable definition for some of you on the far right. now, at long last, it is confirmed.
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually ignorance is a form of
Then it is past time to do some more figuring Lance
because you have missed the boat so to speak.
I am not about trying to explain God which is the
Church Father/theologian forte. If He does not illumine
His Word to you - then there is nothing I could say or
do that would help.
Hey out
No -- my comcast connection must be doing it. I noticed this morning a post that was sent three times. I figure it is Deegan's demon spirit indwelling my computer -- No?
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD why do I get two (2) of everything
And why are you deliberately trying to tweak
Linda? She is a godly woman and It's time to 'get a life' JD.
Opinions are out, well thought out discussion ideas and/or personal anecdotes are
in along with godly
speech that will edify and
encourage those who read you ... Are you up to the
If any demon spirit is indwelling you or your computer
it is there because you permit it JD.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:01:29 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No -- my comcast connection must be doing it. I noticed
this morning a post that was sent three times. I figure it is
Deegan's
Actually, Judy, it is very much the other way around, or is this yet another case of you speaking about that of which you know nothing. Might try reading Shields posted insult and then look for her follow-up explanation (hint: it ain't there).
jd
-- Original message --
I sent it to your computer.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If any demon spirit is indwelling you or your computer it is there because you permit it JD.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:01:29 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No -- my comcast
check again JD - it is still working with you and
yours.. No problem here!!
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:16:41 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I sent it to your computer. jd
From:
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If any demon spirit is indwelling you or your
computer it is
this is a second posting from you.
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If any demon spirit is indwelling you or your computer it is there because you permit it JD.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:01:29 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No -- my comcast
Appreciated.
-- Original message -- From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The unitythat is shared by these individuals is found in theirhigh regard for the Word and their commitment to a living Christ.those two considerations are bigger than all their differing
Lance, Do you believe yourself to be "in the truth"?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I, for one, have no difficulty at all criticizing the'deceived' as you put it, Judy. The difficulty is that some who are, in reality deceived, believe themselves to be 'in the truth' do they not?-
Is this a trick question, Deegan? After John
connecting you with demons in his computer, I find myself somewhat cautious in
responding to such as yourself.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 16:07
In computers they are daemons[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:No -- my comcast connection must be doing it. I noticed this morning a post that was sent three times. I figure it is Deegan's demon spirit indwelling my computer -- No?jd-- Original message -- From: Judy
testing 1 2 3 testingJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: check again JD - it is still working with you and yours.. No problem here!!On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:16:41 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I sent it to your computer. jdFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] If any
Oh, here is one I missed,
1. Yes most of the time I find your writings to be
unclear rather than plain Lance
2. No I don't imply anything, I figure those
whowalk after the Spiritunderstand God's Word.
3. This accusation is uncalled for Lance because what I
addressed was personal accusations
How ironic Lance; you are constantly asking me these
kinds of questions.
So why are they suspect when they come your
way?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:10:33 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a trick question, Deegan? After John
connecting you with demons in his computer, I
No accusation here, Judy. This is a simple
statement of objective truth.You are forever denigrating persons both on and off
TT. You call it speaking the truth when so doing.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
You are reading with the help of the powers of darkness
Lance. I do not denigrate people. This is an
unfounded and evil accusation.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:40:39 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No accusation here, Judy. This is a simple
statement of objective truth.You are
Is everything you write to TT a joke
Lance?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:43:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing ironic here, Judy. I was havin' a little
fun with Kevin. Is 'fun' a secular work or, may it contain a 'spiritual
component'? I opt for the latter.
As for fun having a spiritual component - of course,
all of it does; the question is - What spirit
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:43:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing ironic here, Judy. I was havin' a little
fun with Kevin. Is 'fun' a secular work or,
may it contain
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
