You make some good points, DH.
What do you know fo James White's presentations -- respectful ?
He is one busy hombre, that's for sure.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] free speech has limitations. We recognize that.DAVEH: Really! Who
What do you know fo James White's presentations -- respectful ?
DAVEH: I really don't know anything about him. Wish I could have
heard his comments in real time to get the context and mood of what he
said. I suspect he did show some respect though. Had he not, there is
no way he would have
they already sent their best debaters out but
they didn't stay around long:-)
had James White for
breakfast and didn't break a sweat:-)
DAVEH: Perhaps they (the debaters )
wanted to go inside to listen to what James
White had to say.
:-)
Dean Moore wrote:
Yes, please don't. When words have no meaning, there's not
much sense in using them.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:40
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
Correction: "morally righteous" should read
"morally SELF righteous". To Dean:If Debbie has nothing to teach you (and David
who condemned her) through her rather perceptive post then, you, along with TT's
assembled pharisees (Judy, DM, DH) had just better brighten the (street) corner
where
Perceptive post Lance? Give me a break! You ppl are so into opinions ... Morality is a thing to be desired so why malign this also by adding the "self" like you know something that nobody else is aware of. You've not even heard the first one of them preaching on the street have you?
To JD ..
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:40
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
Christ is not the literal seed of David's genitals Bill and by your
insistance
The only knowledge of Christ available to us is that which
comes by way of the Holy Spirit. To blaspheme Christ in this age is to blaspheme
his Spirit. "By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses
that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God."
Bill
- Original
Job is not alluding to what you are trying to say JD. You need to study what God has to say rather than trying to put words in His mouth like you do with the rest of us constantly. Sin comes down generationally by way of the father. I understand Mary had a father also but that's just the way it
Why am I not surprised that you have a different teaching about this also Bill. Jesus Himself said the unforgivable sin was not against himself or the father. It was blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Nice little play on words there Bill. judyt
No JD Billy T has not solved the conflict for you because "death reigned from Adam to Moses even for those who had not sinned" because they were "sinners" - they all died anyway.
The rcc may have been and still are messed up Bill but they were not brazen enough to give Jesus a sin nature as you and other theologians have done in our generation. All this shows is that you know nothing about God's ways and are blind to sin, judgment, and righteousnes as well. judyt
You are correct, Judy. It was not the Catholic Church which
gave Christ hisnature; that came by way of Adam; however, much like you,
the Catholics have spent their credibility explaining it away.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
So are you saying that salvation is based upon philosophy and
understanding? A person must properly understand and profess the right
Christology in order to be saved?
David M.
p.s. I don't put down you, John. You confuse a put-down of
ideas with who you are. Your ideas will change. You as
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 9:57:58 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Heb 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behooved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 12:19:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
The question is this: what are YOU teaching, Dean? You failed to answer my questions. Here they are , once again:
You make
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/31/2006 7:00:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Dean, do you think in school that Jesus never missed a question on a test
in
his whole life?
IFO would respond NO!
IFO would supplement DM's implicit assertion along
with his obvious change of heart vis a vis conduct.Christology matters as little
as 'homo/lesbo lifestyle' matters; no more no less.I now begin to see why DM
believes Mormons to be on an equal footing with any other
I don't hear Judy saying that a spirit taught her that the flesh of Jesus
was not genetically related to his ancestors. If she did, then we could
readily judge that this spirit is not of God and direct her to reject this
spirit. I think Judy's perceptions come from her framework of
Through God alone may God be known.
- Original Message -
From:
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 06:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting
observation
The only knowledge of Christ available to us is that which
comes by
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 7:23:52 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
I am rethinking that as Christ said only God is good-I now find that one piece is sweeter than the other-but God
DM recants and, we all so appreciate it! He tells
us that "I think Judy's perceptions come from her framework of understanding the
Bible." I KNOW that DM has already put himself on an equal footing with
JT'interpretation-wise' thus, the implicit recantation on DM's part. Amen
David!
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 7:30:20 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
I love it. We can blasphemy the very nature of Christ but that is fine. Surely I am not the only one who
What Christ did in the temple made by hands, is symbolic of
what he did in the temple of his body, driving out everything which stood in
opposition to his Father's will.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday,
JD wrote:
The shock and awe you all experienced with
the use of the f'in word is the same dismay
many feel when the word sodomite is used.
The context, however, is much different. Homosexuals should be ashamed of
the word sodomite. They should also be ashamed of the word Queer. However,
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 10:23:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
you wantthe what??
cd: To understand the Bible better than I do now-jeez G..
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:01:57 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David writes
I affirm [Judy's] position about Christ's
Divinity as much as I affirm Bill's position
about his humanity. I'm just patient that she
will, in time, understand.
Bill wrote:
David, I know you did not intend by your statement
to imply that I affirm only Christ's humanity while
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 10:37:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
yo, Bro, calm down--DaveH cantake you a deeper level intothe "F" word thanDebbieever thought of--just ask him very politely forhis greater
Judy wrote:
David, Actually I am saying the same
as Dean. I believe Jesus walked about
in a flesh and blood body. I just don't
accept that it was a fallen (under the
Adamic curse) flesh and blood body
which is what I am understanding the
rest of you to be saying.
Yes, Judy, we are
Is 'jeez' on a par with the 'F' word,
DM?
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 07:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
- Original Message -
From:
'Home is the sailor, home from the sea. Yikes DM! Ya gonna trot this one
out again? Don't kick a dead horse, DM.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 07:54
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'i DON'T UNDERSTAND'
Judy wrote:
David, I don't see the immaculate conception and
the assumption of Mary as divinely inspired ideas;
both are the thinking of religious spirits through men
of the cloth.
I'm glad to hear that, but history tells us that those who embrace the
premise which you have will be forced
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 11:20:39 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
David, Actually I am saying the same as Dean. I believe Jesus walked about in a flesh and blood body. I just don't accept
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 11:19:39 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
cdwrites: So I ask you How is one able to produce destruction for men while the other produces a quickening spirit for men?
And
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 11:27:52 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
I'd have to disagree with every point made by Bill in his post about the two Adams; Bill you are totally into flesh and
IFO DO NOT HATE JUDY nor anyone else on
TT.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 08:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
- Original Message -
From:
DM says of Judy, 'your interpretation'! As he placed himself alongside JT on
the 'inspiration/illumination' thingy then, once again I commend him for
recanting.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 08:06
David wrote: In Judy, there are some additional concepts about the
biological and spiritual contributions of fathers and mothers that also
muddies the discourse. These must be dealt with one by one before she would
be able to understand certain passages in the right way.
Well, I'll leave that
Bill are you aware that manipulation is sin? Backing a person into a corner with a "repent or fight" attitude has never been God's modus operandi although I do see it in the Crusades and Islam. You are wrong! My prayer for you is that you will eventually receive understanding from God, lay down
Dean, I don't think you are misreading; and I do think we are saying the same thing which is that Jesus did not come into this world with a heathen sin nature. Sin is not just an action. When we receive an occult thought and accept it as ours we are on our way to the action; the scriptures say
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 11:47:58 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [TruthTalk] The spirit of anti-christ
Did I miss an introduction??!!
Anyway -- the post below is spoken as well as a works salvationist can
You are still blending the natures of Christ, Dean.
The result is mixing you up. The Divinity of Christ was in no way tainted by his
humanity. As God and man, Christdefeated sin inhis own flesh,
rendering it powerless in his resurrection from the grave. In the new birth we
are born into his
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 12:50:58 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'i DON'T UNDERSTAND' -David Miller'
Judy, your very style of response is that of the scornful. It is what you are about. But be that as it
yep--you should
receive the bat from Minnesota soon--as soon as it's turned--let me know when it
arrives what you think, etc.,and i'll cash the check
thank
you!
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:48:27 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
g, did you get my check?
jd
--
Judy wrote:
Christ is not the literal seed of David's
genitals Bill and by your insistance that
he is you have far more scripture to explain
away than I do.
Actually, Bill does not have to explain away any Scriptures at all.
However, you have the problem of Acts 2:30. There are other
"STUDY HELPS??" Hello?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 08:35
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
Dean, I don't think you are misreading; and I do think we are saying the
Bill wrote:
What Christ did in the temple made by
hands, is symbolic of what he did in the
temple of his body, driving out everything
which stood in opposition to his Father's will.
Excellent point, Bill. Was Christ himself defiled for stepping into this
Temple? No. He cleaned it up.
Dean wrote:
Then how can can the Second Adam be
the same as the first?
He's not. Jesus was unique because of his spirit, not his flesh.
Dean wrote:
You guys are stating that Christ was no
different than Hitler
Not true.
Dean wrote:
but Hitler was the same as the first Adam
exactly the
Amen, David!
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:03
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Dean wrote:
Then how can can the Second Adam be
the same as the first?
He's not. Jesus was
Well said again, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 08:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
Bill wrote:
What Christ did in the temple made by
hands, is symbolic of what he did
LOL. Lance, it is not recanting. You are just starting to understand me a
little better. As I said before, all of us are engaged in the work of
interpreting Scripture. However, some of us also receive revelation from
time to time. That revelation is in part. None of us have the entire
Good on ya mate!
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Stereotype, David? I have the greatest respect for you, your family and your
ministry! I do have a little fun from time to time, David.
.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Bill wrote:
... I agree with your critique of my (our)
approach. I backed Judy into a corner and
presented her with only two options: either
repent or FIGHT. My hope was that she would
choose the former; of course, she did not. Hence the
likelihood that I will be able to reach her at all is
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 3:14:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
they already sent their best debaters out but they didn't stay around long:-)had James White for breakfast and didn't break
IMHO DM is quite correct on this point. (Spoken as a frequent offender) LM
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'i DON'T UNDERSTAND' -David Miller'
Bill wrote:
... I agree
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 5:56:25 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
Correction: "morally righteous" should read "morally SELF righteous". To Dean:If Debbie has nothing to teach you (and David who
ROTFLOL! Do you think Judy understands your comment?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:53
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
"STUDY HELPS??"
Your arugment is with scripture. It is the Apsotle who proclaims "every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God...and is of the Anti-Christ" (I Jo 4:3). This is the same Apostle who writes "...the Spirit.. gives us understanding .. that we are in Him
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 8:02:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Is 'jeez' on a par with the 'F' word, DM?
cd: :-)
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Dave, sounds like you'er still a little sore for getting booted off of TT for continuing a banned topic. Old news...move on.
I also think your concept of free speech is a little twisted. Free speech laws apply in a public forum, but TT is not a public forum. It is a private discussion group. The
- Original Message -
From: David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 7:40:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
I don't hear Judy saying that a spirit taught her that the flesh of Jesus was not genetically related to his ancestors. If she
Aaaa, another scripture that does not go to the discussion. The fact of the matter is this, in using that scripture I am illustrating the consideration that was the preveailing thought in Jewish thinking concerning what you call "the generational curse." That Christ was born of a woman made
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 8:37:04 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Dean, I don't think you are misreading; and I do think we are saying the same thing which is that Jesus did not come into
No conflict for me. Again, you are not reading posted messages -- just reacting to them. No point responding to comments that have nothing to do with what I wrote.
:-)
jd
-- Original message -- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] No JD Billy T has not solved
I am saying what John the Apostle is saying. Did I not make that clear?
Jesus was (is) God in the flesh. Philosophy did not give this to me. Neither is this from my own understanding. It is John who proclaims that one is not of God on the occasion of denial of this reality. Maybe words and
Well said, Perry.
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Perry
Locke
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
Dave, sounds like you'er still a little sore for getting booted off
What does this mean: Your ideas will change. You as a person will not change?
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So are you saying that salvation is based upon philosophy and understanding? A person must properly understand and profess
David Miller wrote:
free speech has limitations.
We recognize that.
DAVEH:
Really! Who determines those limitations?
... those things are determined by law.
Yes, and the foundation of law is God, not whatever men decide the law
should be.
DaveH wrote:
On the other hand, it seems that
Could you make a line-item response, similar to what David does. For me to respond to you, specifically, and have you write something that is not responsive allows for endless debate.
"Sinful nature" is not "sinning nature." I have a human nature that is given to sin. I can refuse to so act -
No hate, here. The point that Bill has brought into this discussion ala Acts 2:30 , the very point David is trying to get across to Judy is what Judy denies. There is no doubt about what is being said, here.
One simply cannot understand the gopel message apart from the notion that Jesus Christ
And are you aware that this is not the only reason for Bill's passion.? It is not sin to oppose a false doctrine. In fact, just the opposite is true.
Nothing innately sinful about manipulation, Judy. You have no scripture on this and will never have. The fact is this - Jesus used manipulation
cd: Works don't get one saved because we depends on the works of another even Jesus-but we are saved for a work-so you expect to receive a payday from God without working-this from a God who promotes non- laziness? What are you teaching john?
Any "payday" given to us as a result of obedience is
Cash the check before it is too late !!!
King of sounds like "save yourself," doesn't it?
Seriously, go ahead and put it in the bank.
yf jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yep--you should receive the bat from Minnesota soon--as soon as it's
The union is hypostatical, i.e., is personal; the two natures are not mixed or confounded, and it is perpetual
-- Original message -- From: "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are still blending the natures of Christ, Dean. The result is mixing you up. The Divinity of
David makes some good points, here, Dean.
At some point in life, Hitler had a choice. at some point in time, Hitler was not the devil we know him to be. At some point in time, he was as innocent and impressionable as your children.
If there ever was a contrast in response to our Adamic
Hypothetical??
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 13:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
The union
is hypostatical, i.e., is personal; the
Should I try your approach in my next counseling session?
"O. !! Glad you folks were able to make it. My understanding is that you two queers have some sort of misgiving about the perception of others concerning your sodomizing way of life. Hopefully, at the end of this session, you two
I John 5:20 "-- Jesus is the true God."
Making a distinction between "Lord" and "God" is to misunderstand exactly what Peter was saying when he pronounced Jesus as Lord and Messiah (Acts 2:36).
Peter is saying that Christ is both God and Messiah !!!
jd
- Original Message -
JD wrote:
What does this mean: Your ideas will
change. You as a person will not change?
What I mean is that you, your identity, who you are, will not change.
However, your ideas will change. You are growing and maturing in your
thoughts and viewpoints. Therefore, any challenge I might
JD wrote:
Sinful nature is not sinning nature.
Excellent point, John. A sinful nature provides a source of temptation, but
it is not synonymous with the idea of a sinning nature, a nature that must
sin despite whatever we think, say, or do.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be
Dean wrote:
Respectfully David -Judy has stated dozens
of times that she believes Christ came in the
flesh. Yet the group keeps denying she denying
she said this. Why can't people hear her?
We can't hear Judy when she says this because when we get down to discussing
the details, we learn
What you actually do (how you live your life, the content of your character)
IS what you believe. Other than this is abstract, theoretical and dualistic.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 14:07
Subject:
No, John, that won't work. You have to learn to shift gears to understand
street preaching. I would never speak this way one on one. It only shuts
the person down. In street preaching, however, we can redirect our speech
toward others. We can bring out what the homosexuals are really
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 8:50:58 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the Root and the Offspring of David
yep--you should receive the bat from Minnesota soon--as soon as it's turned--let me know when it arrives what you think,
Ya know that baseball bat that's goin' from Colorado to
California...well..send one to Florida will ya?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 14:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
No,
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 9:39:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation
Your arugment is with scripture. It is the Apsotle who proclaims "every spirit that does not confess that
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 2/1/2006 9:04:04 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Dean wrote:
Then how can can the Second Adam be
the same as the first?
He's not. Jesus was unique because of his
cd:
Leave to a church of God member
to being up Acts 2 :-)
:-) Except, I'm not a church of God member, and haven't been since 1987.
CD wrote:
I think it is a good passage that I agree with David.
Christ came from the loins of King David as God
swore with an oath-and you point?
The point
"..Jesus Christ came in the flesh .."
The phrase is a declaration of the divinity of Christ. If He were not God on earth, Dean, OF COURSE HE CAME IN THE FLESH. Surely you do not believe that John is stating the obvious !! I came in the flesh. You have - Judy has. No, this is a statement that
Dean wrote: You guys are stating that Christ was no different than Hitler Not true.cd: Yes true -read John responces-he said this.
Dean -- please paste the quotes from me that cause you to say this. I am curious.
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL
You do understand how I and many others might think you answer rather curious. to speak one on one with different terminology than a speech offtered to a congregation of individuals (hmm congregation of INDIVIDUALS) is a surprising consideration for one who preaches with the hope of
Let me add this thought: you will accomplish no lasting good with the strategy you have revealed in this post. And, you may have put your daughter in harm's way.
Your sign is so very wrong if, in fact, you are trying to bring people to Christ rather than simply exposing them for the
Two things.
1. Your manner of speech tells me what you think of me.
2. You are a dualist and I am not.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD wrote: What does this mean: Your ideas will change. You as a person will not change? What
Cool. I'll add this to that 10% I keep talking about.
Turn about is fair play -- your comments to Judy have been noteworthy.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD wrote: "Sinful nature" is not "sinning nature." Excellent point, John.
Dean - I will use this as a benchmark statement. David's post says it all. Nothing else to say. Please consider what he is telling you.
Judy you too.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean wrote: Respectfully David -Judy has
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 1:48:09 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
I John 5:20 "-- Jesus is the true God."
Making a distinction between "Lord" and "God" is to misunderstand
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 1:19:33 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
David makes some good points, here, Dean.
At some point in life, Hitler had a choice. at some point in time,
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 1:05:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [TruthTalk] The spirit of anti-christ
cd: Works don't get one saved because we depends on the works of another even Jesus-but we are saved for
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/31/2006 1:13:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
cd wrote:
If it [flesh] was weak show me one biblical
account where it was weak-and we will discuss
that
Here
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
