ngetragen beim Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 70507
Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE201038407
Sie wollen auch unterwegs im Bereich Telekommunikation informiert sein?
http://mobil.teltarif.de bringt die gewohnten Informationen auf Ihr Handy.
--
Anthony Peacock
Head of Reasearch & Development, FBS Advanced IT Support Centre
CHIME, Whittington Campus
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Scanner?
Check the "Spam List =" and "Spam Lists To Be Spam =" config settings.
MailScanner will mark a message as spam if the number of RBLs configured
in "Spam Lists To Be Spam =" are hit, regardless of the SpamAssassin score.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, UCL Medi
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:40 +0100, Anthony Peacock wrote:
http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25708610-15306,00.html
Is that to a Spam Cartel? It's overpriced :-)
Well the article states "Ms Sullivan said the highest "legitimate&qu
http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25708610-15306,00.html
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, UCL Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
RIC_IXHASH BODY: iXhash found @ generic.ixhash.net
0.5 NIXSPAM_IXHASH BODY: iXhash found @ ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with
no rDNS
--
Anthony Peacock
Paweł Tęcza wrote:
Anthony Peacock pisze:
Hi,
Paweł Tęcza wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Please show us your addition tests, of course :D
Unless you are a UK Higher Education organisation you won't be able to
use RCVD_IN_JANET_DUL.
What a pity. We are Polish university :)
Yes, but this is ju
Hi,
Paweł Tęcza wrote:
Anthony Peacock pisze:
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Hello,
Could you give us the line from your local.cf to enable such tests ?
Thanks in advance,
Which tests? You quote the whole list, some are standard some are
additions.
Hi Anthony,
Please show us your
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Anthony Peacock a écrit :
[..]
0.9 RCVD_IN_PBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[62.57.252.74 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
3.0 RCVD_IN_XBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
2.0 RCVD_IN_JANET_DUL
J_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
0.4 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
It looks like my Bayes is trained to be better at picking these up.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, UCL Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health I
ms?
Hello Ibrahim,
Could you please show me the Content-* headers of image attachment?
Did you send all headers of that spam in your previous post?
I have some success with fighting that spam I called "BAD GOOD PENIS",
but I can see that it evolves, so my rules should be improved too.
My
canner mailing list.
I do think that looks wrong to me.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
hem into the FN range.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
here any more...
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
. But how can I delete this auto-whitelist? I found two of them in
/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist and
/var/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.
I even disabled it in /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre
No avail. :(
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure what you think the problem is. If you
: auto-whitelist: DB addr list: file locked, breaking lock
[18824] dbg: locker: safe_unlock: unlink
/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock
[18824] dbg: auto-whitelist: post auto-whitelist score: 2.393667
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
t least see when it
is firing, but it won't have a large impact on the overall score.
score MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT 0.1
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
e
body SHOPPING_B
/\b(?:luxury|handbag|rolex|gucci|armani|prada|dsquared|burberry|hermes|fashion|discount|replica|watches|\bdior\b|bikkember)/i
describe SHOPPING_B Non adoro sperperare
Thanks for any help,
Simone.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University Coll
learn 200 spam _AND_ 200 HAM messages before Bayes will
start scoring.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
change to stops those messages, by
disabling all of the habeas.com tests.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study at CHIME in 2008. http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
Hi,
ram wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:49 +, Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
I have just received a number of spam emails which got through the
filtering system because they hit the HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI rule, which
give them -8. They all came to role based addresses that are never used
Hi,
Following up to myself...
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi Justin,
Justin Mason wrote:
Jason Haar writes:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
I have had a look around the http://www.habeas.com/ website and
can't really see how to check the company in question, or make a
complaint. There is a for
Hi Justin,
Justin Mason wrote:
Jason Haar writes:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
I have had a look around the http://www.habeas.com/ website and can't
really see how to check the company in question, or make a complaint.
There is a form for asking them to ask the company to remove these
addr
I want to complain about the company.
Does anyone know anything about this. At this stage I am planning on
changing the score for all HABEAS_ACCREDITED_??? rules to 0, to make
them neutral to the score.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical Schoo
ve you run spamassassin --lint and spamassassin --debug?
Was MailScanner working fine before this, or is this a new install of
MailScanner?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study at CHIME in 2008. http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/
have absolutely
nothing to do with SPAM detection. They are used in MailScanner's
Phishing detection feature. I really do not think they can be used
without modification in SA as SPAM signs.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://ww
pose and use it in a another
situation without understanding what it is there for.
These are white and blacklists for the Phising detection feature, they
have nothing to do with spam detection.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://
le to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is
about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from
MailScanner. But since I just started to use SpamAssassing I'm asking is it
wise and needed.
Regards,
Giga
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
Those files are eff
e URI RBLs are better.
I just started using SpamAssassin and I would like to see some opinion from
more expirienced users.
Regards,
Giga
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less t
icence for updates runs out
after 30 days?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET sca
). (Note that if you only want to perform
statistical learning, and do not want to report mail to third-parties,
you should use the sa-learn command directly instead.)"
This option teaches the Bayesian system, but also submits to third party
systems like DCC and SpamCop.
--
Anthon
John Thompson wrote:
On 2008-01-23, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My intention was to manually feed the few spam messages that slip thru
undetected. By the time I get a hold of those, they are in the
recipient's mail client inbox, not in the server.
I was thinking, if
folders that are saved on the local hard disk.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
they're only looking for one thing, whereas
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Anthony Peacock escribió:
Well the short answer is, yes you can.
The slightly longer answer is that you won't get as good results
doing this, as the Bayes system uses tokens found in the complete
message. By only learning on the body you will not gain any
advantag
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Anthony Peacock escribió:
Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body
of a message to sa-learn?
/Diego
Yes you can, who to stop it?
I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one
message.
I meant without the headers, just the
nd in headers.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET scan could result in
a lot of
Rick Zeman wrote:
What could it trigger on?If you take it outside of the context of the
info that you provided that's NOT apparent from that email, it's a
perfectly legitimate email message from a perfectly legit MTA (well, as
legit as hotmail is).
Feed it into Bayes?
HRZ-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
That markup is added by MailScanner not SpamAssassin. SpamAssasin can't
automatically remove that markup, it only removes markup
ng the checks on the Bayes database as
the same user that SA runs as normally?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
they're onl
..
Thanks
Claudia Burman
Argentina
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET scan could r
your thoughts, and also let me know whether deleting
both of those files is a good way to go.
No.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
t
ur thoughts, and also let me know whether deleting
both of those files is a good way to go.
No.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
the
"v312.pre" and SA was loading the copy included with SA 3.2 via "v320.pre".
So... not a bug.
Regards,
Daryl
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"I'm in shape. - ROUND is a shape"
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
And as I noted above, by the time I see the error from the cron
output, running sa-update by hand does not show the problem. It is
almost as if it only happen if there really is an update to download.
rm -f /var/lib/spamassassin/3.0010
o by default) in the 3.1.8 channels by mistake...
But I guess if that was happening more people would have piped up by now
:-)
Luix
2007/6/5, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
>
>> You're probably
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
And as I noted above, by the time I see the error from the cron
output, running sa-update by hand does not show the problem. It is
almost as if it only happen if there really is an update to download.
rm -f /var/lib/spamassassin/3.0
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
You're probably loading the plugin twice, one from your local.cf or a
v3**.pre file, and the other from the ImageInfo.cf. Take out one of
the LoadPlugin directives (preferably the one from local.cf or the
*.pre files), and everything
?
--
System Admin
CHIME, Royal Free & University Collge Medical School
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"I'm in shape. - ROUND is a shape"
. It is almost as if
it only happen if there really is an update to download.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"I'm in shape. - ROUND is a shape"
e to
write a lot more custom rules to achieve what we really want.
Or lower the spam threshold...
Or raise the scores of the rules that are hitting...
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have
$tmpd = `domainname`;
my $tmp = "$tmph.$tmpd";
$tmp =~ tr/\0\r\n//d;
return $tmp;
},
},
The commented out "my $tmp line is the original lime.
PS your colourful backgr
r your question.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
idea and I have an id
n I
was using RDJ, I am sure that the script downloads to its TMPDIR and
runs some sanity checks, then copies the files into the SA directory.
Try running RDJ manually with debugging switched on.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www
your requirements
for these spams, and someone might be able to suggest a rule that meets
your needs.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then
d a couple of others it does the trick.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have
BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-=Aubrey=-
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: 40
X-Spam-Report: hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_
X-Original-Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
Because, more
hat matches is "From:" which is the header I posted
below.
It seems as if it is not reading the whitelist_from entries at all. Or
whitelisting is somehow disabled, is that possible?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:19:06PM +0100, Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
I would think we need to see the FULL
iginal-Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have a
s BAYES_99
which adds 3.5 points, and your Bayes system scored it as BAYES_40 which
subtracted 0.2 points.
I did get a few of those emails come through at the start, but by
feeding them into my Bayes system they now get caught.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medi
RBL: Relay in JANET MAPS RBL+ RBL
[102.176.29.76 listed in
rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net]
0.0 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmh
to block the messages, we
would need to see what the messages are.
Same form as before, save the message (with full headers) and place it
somewhere where we can download it.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
&
27;m missing out
on?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
idea and I
ut you may also need
to train it with a few similar messages for it to
significantly change its scoring.
You're saying right. Now I understand.
Thank you,
rocsca
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
&q
o significantly change its scoring.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
e is that my Bayesian scoring gives it a
BAYES_99 score and your's gives it a BAYES_50 score.
So you are saying that I have to train SA?
That would be how you would improve your Bayes accuracy, yes.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http:
=no version=3.1.8
Then the biggest difference is that my Bayesian scoring gives it a
BAYES_99 score and your's gives it a BAYES_50 score.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.]
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.
ssassin, without any updated rules, the newer sorts of spam are
less likely to be caught.
Using the latest version of SA with sa-update to keep the rules up to
date should help a lot.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.uc
ed by the command
line and not MailScanner.
What user do you run the command line checks as, and what user does
MailScanner run as?
Do you run sa-update?
Some versions of MailScanner required a configuration setting to be
correctly set before it would find the rules downloaded by sa-update.
ide open security hole, which could
get compromised in the future.
This switch is there for the rare occasion where you decide to allow a
channel to update a plugin automatically. This is something you would
do only after reviewing that channel.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & Univ
Hi,
Jon Armitage wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 February 2007 15:56
To: SpamAssassin Users
sa-update updates the stock rules that are distributed with
SA. Rules Du Jour is used to update add-on rulesets like the
SARE rules.
If
pdate?
sa-update updates the stock rules that are distributed with SA. Rules
Du Jour is used to update add-on rulesets like the SARE rules.
If you are not running sa-update you are only updating a small section
of your rules.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University Colleg
e and after
instruct bayes db..
The other thing to do is to run sa-update to make sure you are running
the latest versions of the standard SA rules.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-update.html
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW
o you need to continue to feed messages into the system. If you
can train your Bayes system to correctly mark these at 99% probability
that will give you another 3.5 marks.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
&qu
working, although you now need to train it that these
messages are SPAM.
You can use the sa-learn utility to teach the Bayes system about Spam.
sa-learn --ham < email.txt
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html
Your network tests are still not working. Run spamassassin
aking any changes to SA rules or configuration.
# /usr/bin/spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.1.7
running on Perl version 5.8.8
OS: SLES 10
Linux av5 2.6.16.21-0.8-bigsmp #1 SMP Mon Jul 3 18:25:39 UTC 2006 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
rocsca
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & Unive
D switch.
It doesn't look like you are running any network tests, you are
certainly not running any Bayes tests.
Can you remind us what OS this is on, what version of spamasssassin, how
you installed SA, how you call SA?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University Colle
txt
If you want a lot more information you can use the debug switch
spamassassin -D -t < email.txt
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
ustify this? What I miss?
1. You need to download and install the SARE_STOCKS ruleset from
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
2. You should enable network tests
Can you so us which tests these emails hit on your system?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical Scho
1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?60.215.113.19>]
Looking at this my Bayes scores it highly, but so does a rules from the
SARE_STOCKS rule set. There are also a number of network tests which
get this.
omatic
update with rdj?)
I think you need to make available an example of the messages that
aren't being stopped. Preferably with full headers. That way people
here can run them through their systems and tell you which rules hit them.
Put a full email (including all headers) on a web
that if the Bayes learned something as ham that it shouldn't, sa-learn
was smart enough to undo it.
Change the thresholds for auto learning. Mine are:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 12.0
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University C
Hi Dan,
Dan Barker wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:22 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes
I also manually learn by mistake. All FNs & FPs are fed back to the
system. And I occasion
m. And, voila!, I'm now running under one
percent.
Has anyone else seen this? Are there any suggestions as to how to
deal with this? Should I regularly rebuild the bayes files?
Appreciate any advice.
Jack
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, an
as
"in emergency only"."
This defaults to 800.
As the docs say, if this happens regularly you can raise this value to
keep the FIFO behaviour. But if your incoming queue is regularly
backing up that much you probably should look at why.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Roya
Hi,
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:59, Anthony Peacock wrote:
I realise that DCC is not a direct indicator of spamminess but an
indicator of bulkiness. And I also realise that the correct answer to
my question is 'it depends on your local needs'...
Given tha
score is enough to tip
these over. I know I could adjust the DCC score, but was wondering what
other people do?
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchan
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Kevin Golding wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jo
Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
These arguments are getting sillier and sillier. I'm asking why it
doesn't work in a plain-jane do-nothing normal public box not behind
a NAT. And every ar
nce manually configured the trusted networks to allow for some
down-stream hosts that are part of our organisation. But even without
that I have never had ALL_TRUSTED misfire on me.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~
t- spamassassin.apache.org"
->
->
-> --
-> Anthony Peacock
My fault, that blah at blahblahblah stuff just doesn't jump out at me and
even though it is bold and large, the stuff below it gets my attention more
because they are www "links...
Can anyone relate?
Agreed
e.org"
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
idea and I have an idea and we e
ctory as sa-update?)
Bookworm
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
i
can't find anything in the previous mails in here. And google give
nothing.
Anyone got an idea ?
--
F a b i e n G a r z i a n o
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have
t's fairly good,but it's too
> expensive for us.)
>
> Thanks,
> --Jeff
>
>
>
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exc
? Or did I just mess my
mind up?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will s
Justin Mason wrote:
Anthony Peacock writes:
Rick Cooper wrote:
From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:23 PM
To: Rick Cooper
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Discourage broken content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Cooper
he size limit or disable it to
get around this issue at the moment.
There is some concern about removing the limit completely, so the
current discussion is about a scheme that checks ahead for a Mime
boundary within a fixed window after the max size value is reached.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHI
nve Bayes that the
spammy looking maling lists messages are ham I add those lists to one of
the whitelists.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange
who can tell you
what the reasons are.
If they are using SpamAssassin and they can provide you with the list of
rules that hit your emails, then this list might be able to give you
advice on how to stop this happening in the future. Without that we are
just guessing.
--
Anthony Peacock
C
Hi,
Beast wrote:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
Beast wrote:
Any reason why this config failed?
According to Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold it is a
valid config.
# spamassassin --lint
[11919] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo