http://www.mnstories.com/archives/2006/02/cable_fable.html
I just can't keep this one to myself... check out this grainy video
from 1980. It was shot when George Stoney, aka the godfather
of public access came to the Twin Cities to help folks setup
cable access. The best part is learning what a
I think we can respectfully make suggestions regarding how some vloggers view the set of needs for video publishing however IMHO we should not tell them how to run their businesses. If a host wants to show their logo or use Flash it's their business decision, it doesn't make them bad or evil, the
Thanks Josh, worked perfectly... that's one less reason that iWeb won't work
for me!
I believe that if I knew a lot more about what I was doing I could probably
modify the
template to include a comments feature, as well, from what I've heard.
Unfortunately that's a
bit out of my league.
Vu
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:32:50 +0100, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I want a script like these that runs on every site I visit.
Maybe it scrubs the page for all the .mov, .wmv, and .mp4 files and
presents
a list of links to them?
Possible?
A Greasemonkey solution is the obvious
weblog-safe link:
http://tinyurl.com/7d2er
-daniel
--
Daniel Liss
AIM: pouringdownpix
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
http://pouringdown.blogspot.com/
_
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
Yahoo! Groups Links
*
Well that didn't take long!
I see that apple is updating everything in the new iLife 06, including a
52.6MB update for iMovie!
sounds like more than just a patch.
hopefully they have fixed a few bugs
fyi
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.org
I'll hang out in the Node 101 chatroom for a while, if anyone's around...On 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm intrigued by how successful these new Flash hosting companies aredoing, look at the youtube growth figures,
If you don't want to call it a vlog then call it a video podcast or a vidcast
(some
people say vodcast but I don't buy into that)
I couldn't make sense of you site at all. Are there any episode up yet? I'd
suggest not publicicing your feed or site until you have decent content and a
few
(Apologies for the promotional happy tone of this email, I'm just
pleased with myself today)
I've just changed mefeedia so that tag pages (like
http://mefeedia.com/tags/nyc/) and feed pages (like
http://mefeedia.com/feeds/553/) have even more direct links to your
videoblogs: each video has a big
We have a chat room!?On 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll hang out in the Node 101 chatroom for a while, if anyone's around...-- Me:
http://michaelverdi.comRD: http://evilvlog.comLearn to videoblog: http://freevlog.orgLearn to videoblog in person:
http://node101.org
http://stickam.com/editChatRoom.do?method=loadroomId=170594616 - see if that link works
On 2/16/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a chat room!?On 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll hang out in the Node 101 chatroom for a while, if anyone's
Shouldn't be surprising, really. But I thought I would share:
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=USODKPN
HPJZR4QSNDBESKHA?articleID=180201849
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Also check out http://beginningwithi.com/vlog/livecam.htmlOn 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://stickam.com/editChatRoom.do?method=loadroomId=170594616 - see if that link works
On 2/16/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a chat room!?On 2/16/06,
Hi folks!
Remember that little Tour De Vloggers thing I wanted to set up a few
months ago?
Well, on the word doc that's in the files section of this group, I
list San Francisco as the site for February's Tour De Vloggers stop,
and Schlomo as the organizer! Schlomo, are you still interested in
Here is exactly what I want.
I want a set-top box I can watch rss feeds with enclosures on. It
would be connected to the Internet.
I would set up which feeds to watch through its web-based interface,
and also set up what time of day/night those feeds would update to my
set top box.
I know
from http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePageart_aid=39848
Points North: Consumers Crave Web-Based TV
by Gavin O'Malley,Wednesday, Feb 15, 20066:01 AM EST
ONLINE MEDIA COMPANIES MUST ARRANGE to
make their content available
This is the exact same subject I was going to approach after Bill
posted the survey showing that people prefer watching video on their
television screens. The whole thing makes sense because you get to
sit on a comfy couch and the video takes up the whole screen... who
WOULDN'T want to watch all
Hey guys, just joined the forum
Are there any video bloggers that are going to head out to Cebit?
I'm heading out there and want to get a few others to coordinate some
Cebit video blog coverage
let me know if there any video bloggers from Germany interested, or
any others that are going to be
This survey is a juxtaposition that discards differences of Video originally intended for TV or Theatres and that which is more native to a computer/internet (vlogs). Primarily, typical length of online video being less than 10 minutes verses 20-50 minutes TV programs.
young people are
http://www.torrentocracy.com/screenshots.shtmlOn 2/16/06, Susan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Here is exactly what I want.I want a set-top box I can watch rss feeds with enclosures on.It
would be connected to the Internet.I would set up which feeds to watch through its web-based interface,and also
Hey,Check this new version outIf you have a project that needs an easy way to upload large fileshttp://encodable.com/filechucker/beautiful and free, always a great combo.
-- - - - - Sullhttp://vlogdir.com
SPONSORED LINKS
ok, not freeused to be.i assumed.beautiful and $9.00 ;-)On 2/16/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Hey,Check this new version outIf you have a project that needs an easy way to upload large files
http://encodable.com/filechucker/beautiful and free, always a great combo.
-- -
It actually is not my site, but I am getting intrigued by how some
people are using it. Yesterday, Enric and I were talking in stickam and
he suggested I pop a dv tape into my camera (that I was using to chat
with) and I streamed a movie. Wow, very meta. I could have dozens of
people watching
My husband and I are building a MythTV box that will do this, though I
don't know how well, since I'm not familiar with Media RSS tools for
Linux (except to know FireAnt isn't there yet). I am videotaping the
experience and will post an instructional vlog when it's done.
We ran into a few
You don't have to use a .mac account to use it. You can publish
anywhere.
I played around a bit with iWeb, and was suprised to see that the
output was nearly a pure CSS layout. A not very clean or efficient
CSS, but pure css none the less.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
That's very true, Bill, just not efficiently.
What I had said was that in order to get the full functionality and ease of use
out of iWeb you
need .Mac... it allows you to have features such as advanced slide shows
(without .Mac you
can still have basic slideshow), password protected pages,
I've created a videoblogging room under Chatroom tab at
http://www.stickam.com. The chat room is private with the PASSWORD:
vlog
Then click the Enter this room link.
It is listed under the Computers Internet section. The link to
the stickam Chat Rooms is:
I would guess - practically none.
I used it in a recent piece with Richard Stallman, at his insistence, but
actually didn't include it in
my podcast rss, as I thought it just wouldn't be viewable for most.
http://punkcast.com/905/
It does have native supprt in VLC, and there are plug-ins for
this might help:
http://snipurl.com/mmv3>
On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 2/16/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm intrigued by how successful these new Flash hosting companies are
doing, look at the youtube growth figures, look at how cool the vsocial
Okay here's the dealio gang. I've been using the approximate settings
for a avi to QT conversion in my Adobe Premier elements but I'm always
concerned that film integrity is being compromised and/or lost in the
conversion.
Is anyone else using Adobe Premier elements and if so... PLEASE for
Okay so here:
www.ravensspace.blogspot.com
My Alter Ego has a vlog of it's own!
hope you enjoy our first post: The Vlog Widow Starring none other
than Richard's Wife that's right Mrs. Show herself!
Cheers!
Lisa
AKA: Richard's Daughter
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the
Shouldn't the graph heading be Daily Reach (per thousand)?
Otherwise youtube has reached almost 10 billion people :)
Where is this graph from? If a simple mistake like that is on the
graph, it needs some backup.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
Like how some websites catch on and get huge traffic, I posted a clip
this morning you might find helps you shape your strategy.
Hint: they talk about pics, video and tech cycle.
http://www.24x7.com/blog/2006-02/jakob-lodwick-james-hong/
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo,
graph is from alexa.com
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
On Feb 16, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Enric wrote:
Shouldn't the graph heading be Daily Reach (per thousand)?
Otherwise youtube has reached almost 10
Lisa,I thought you were exporting it as AVI and then compressing with quick time pro?... Richard (your father who bought quick time pro for you :)On 2/16/06,
grasshopperatyourfeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay here's the dealio gang.I've been using the approximate settingsfor a avi to QT
It's probably the number of hits or something like that, rathar than
unique individuals per day.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
graph is from alexa.com
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog:
This is actually the best way to do it. Exporting .mov files in
Premiere Elements gives...uhh...in my opinion, very poor file compression.
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lisa,
I thought you were exporting it as AVI
Richard,
When I was using Movie maker I was doing exactly that... But it
seems as though Adobe doesn't allow you to export it as an AVI file?
Perhaps I've completely lost my marbles I can double check it
and see what happens but when I tried it yesterday it wouldn't let
me. Maybe I didn't
first of all, it's ravensspace.blogspot.com (there's not a www - it doesn't work with the www)second of all, I have to say, I'm glad that I subscribe to the yahoo vlog list, so that I can find out what my wife and daughter are up to while I'm at work
as for the video, I have to say ... good
that's number of people out of one million. So Youtube is approaching
10,000 per every 1,000,000 people or 1% of all uniques on the internet.On 2/16/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's probably the number of hits or something like that, rathar than
unique individuals per day.
-- Enric
first of all, everybody knows you used the $30 I gave you to buy some beans for a beanstalk instead of buying quicktime pro like you were supposed to ... don't deny it ... second, I suspect the confusion is that it doesn't say something logical like export .avi ... you just
file export
Alexa is daily reach per million people on the web, as I understand
it. They also give you an overall rank as to your absolute
popularity (as measured in traffic to your domain) on the web.
They measure traffic through certain gateways on the web, so
measurements may not be entirely accurate,
Wow.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
that's number of people out of one million. So Youtube is
approaching 10,000
per every 1,000,000 people or 1% of all uniques on the internet.
On 2/16/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's probably the
I would love to give you an answer but it does seem that Premiere Elements is doing something weird. When I export movie and select DV-AVI or Quicktime and configure it for DV I get a file that is only a little more than half the file size of my original DV file. What's going on? I don't know
Now wait just a pea pickin minute here! I'll have you know that the
Beanstalk came complimentary with the sign up package at no
additional cost and I'm glad it did because obviously it was to make
up for the lack of logical instructions.
(thanks for the heads up.. I'll be going back to my
export movie (althlough it's hard for me to imagine I know something michael doesn't, so I'm probably wrong :)On 2/16/06, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would love to give you an answer but it does seem that Premiere Elements is doing something weird. When I export movie and
Youare.tv gets brownie points - they wrote to me, had a glitch which should now be fixed, so I'll try again ASAP.On 2/16/06,
robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cheers, Dierdre.i emailed stickam and youare.tv to give them a heads-up re your testpage.anyone see a hosting service missing we
this is a good interview. thank you!On 2/16/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Like how some websites catch on and get huge traffic, I posted a clip
this morning you might find helps you shape your strategy.
Hint: they talk about pics, video and tech cycle.
Here's what I did:I captured video as DV-AVI in WMM. I exported it as a DV-AVI file. These two files seemed to be exactly the same - same codes, same file size, same data rate, etc.I imported that DV-AVI file into Premiere Elements and did the export movie thing. I tried a number of settings -
--
Dear Vloggers,
I hope you are well.
Thank you for your patience.
I am looking for Recommendations for animation software that could produce
animations like the attached peace-action.gif
Please reply.
Warmest Regards,
Jeff Brooks
[Please note: This email is intended only for the
So at this point... It looks like I can either put up with it or
switch software editing packages? Ugg what a horrid prospect.. I
like the features in Premier elements a LOT...I'll keep dinking with
it and see what happens...
Thanks Mike!
Lisa (the Daughter)
--- In
Sure, with the crappy web video user interface we have today (play/pause + slider), it's no surprise that people prefer to watch TV programs on TVs. TV programs were made for TV sets. What's so surprising to me, actually, is how high the numbers are for computers given this fact and the fact
Hello Jeff,You could use Synfig http://www.synfig.com/. (Although it might be a bit of an over kill.)You could also use the GIMP
http://gimp.org/ using the it's GAP subsystem. Here's some links on GAP (that I found with a bit of searching): http://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Using_GAP/
when I have captured video with elements, it's seemed to work fine, so maybe it's a matter of it doesn't like the imported DV-AVI file (at least that's the position I'm retreating to for now ...
On 2/16/06, grasshopperatyourfeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So at this point... It looks like I can
So beyond the usual suspects speaking their mind about all this video stuff myself included I'm interested to read or watch opinions of others on this mailing list... maybe some who more often lurk... maybe you have a vlog and are looking for the topic of your next post Remember we
A few articles I have read this week suggest so. well, not entirely, but you'll understand the context one you read. This goes towards the battle of the web and the breaking apart of content and context.
http://squeetblog.blogspot.com/http://www.alwaysbeta.com/2006/02/03/rss-is-90-awful/
What a wicked tool, not only video, pictures but audio and a web cam chat(even though it's quite echoy. But still a step in the right direction none the less.I am in love so far. Doesn't accept MP4's though yet, I wonder why?PaulOn 16 Feb 2006, at 19:30, Enric wrote: Wow. --- In
There are a lot of uses for RSS beyond aggregation and aggregators.RSS is simply the standard that has taken precendence for delivery of microcontent, i.e. blog entries/news, and now podcasts/media/video. For video this provides much needed contextual metadata that is otherwise not present or
well put. all true. i commented on the -rss is aweful- article to that effect... the authors were focusing not on RSS as much as the tools that utilize RSS.On 2/16/06,
Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of uses for RSS beyond aggregation and aggregators.RSS is simply
BTW, the bandwidth question is kind of silly... you'd use up more
bandwidth if those people were viewing your website with all the
images and style formatting and so forth.
Back to my point about data though... RSS just happens to be the de
facto standard and the one with the widest support.
Hello Michael,On 2/16/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few articles I have read this week suggest so. well, not entirely, but you'll understand the context one you read. This goes towards the battle of the web and the breaking apart of content and context.
i agree bandwidth question is silly and that the application usage is
more the issue
i also like your example, but i think it bears rethinking. consider a
typical vlog...
In the first time visit scenario, the browser most likely consumes less
bandwidth than the aggregator. This depends
Hello,(This is actually a research area of mine :-) )(Note sure I have enought time to answer all those questions, but) I think people are going to eventually be watching vlogs, vidcasts, vodcasts, Internet TV, etc, on their big screen TVs. Sure they'll watch it on their computer (and phone
You're talking more about a media aggregator like FireAnt as opposed
to a browser. Sure, FireAnt will use up the bandwidth required to
download the media, so would your browser if you were viewing as much
media.
But the article is describing regular News Readers as consuming too
much bandwidth
no, actually, i was comparing the two equally
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
You're talking more about a media aggregator like FireAnt as opposed
to a browser.
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
I'm sorry... I meant to say, you were comparing a media aggregator
like FireAnt to a standard web browser in terms of bandwidth usage,
whereas the article pointed out was describing a regular text based
News Aggregator to a web browser in terms of bandwidth usage.
I think its silly to compare a
i understand and agree, i was mainly just diving deeper into how the
bandwidth was consumed vs cached.
the main point is that they are different for these apps; but then so
are their purposes and hence the difficulty in comparison as you say
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
I'm sorry... I meant
Ok...this is how *I* work with Premiere Elements...
Start a new project. Use the default preset of DV-NTSC.
Capture video.
Edit video.
When finished, go File, Export, Movie.
Save it as an AVI. Generally the default settings are all fine. They
should be the following...
Export
Video and
Hey,
Hope this finds you well. Here's the first podcast from a pet project
of mine. The 3 Minute Gig Video Podcast is a live music podcast
filmed at one of Manchester UK's esteemed live music venues. We
(www.realfresh.tv) film a night of live music with the freshest bands
on the indie music
On 2/16/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So beyond the usual suspects speaking their mind about all this video stuff myself included I'm interested to read or watch opinions of others on this mailing list... maybe some who more often lurk... maybe you have a vlog and are
Not sure, but I think the most restrictive CC license protects your
commecial rights to your productions and only permits them to be
copied and uploaded for non-commercial use.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/06, Jay dedman
Do you enjoy watching vlog video on: + The Web+
Desktop Media Player and/or Aggregator+ TV+ Portable Media
Player (viPod, PSP etc)
The web. I was using FireAnt for awhile, but
I find the Google Reader easier, so subscribe thru Google Reader and then watch
the original video link. If I
Thanks Deirdre, and thanks Robert.
I hadn't checked this email in a while so I missed first part of this
discussion, but I think that while the first generation of online
video hosting sites aren't exactly what you want them to be, they are
still learning from user behaviors.
So as early
right.i too was skeptical of the math but like i have time to truly confirm such a scenario... nope.but in general i was interested in the thought about bandwidth abuse by software. its not something talked much about... maybe because its a non-issue but i would need to investigate all
Do you enjoy watching vlog video on:
+ The Web
+ Desktop Media Player and/or Aggregator
+ TV
+ Portable Media Player (viPod, PSP etc)
Mostly...the web.
Questions questions questions.
Are you hard core? Spend several hours a day watching video?
Not hard core. I'll
I'm amassing a pile of things to sell on ebay to finance the purchase of one of
these. I
want to carry it in my purse...except that I'm selling my purse on ebay...
Bekah
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, daniel liss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
weblog-safe link:
http://tinyurl.com/7d2er
I am going to jump in on this thread (a rare thing!)
Michael Sullivan wrote:
this undesirable scenario would prob be more likely with the plethora
of what i call 'orphaned feeds' that some directories store. these
are typically feeds that services generatebased on tags, user
Bitrate/quality might be an issue (although I long for one too)...
Here's an article that I wrote in January for a photo newsletter for
www.pixpo.com (shameless plug) that talks gently about some of its
shortcomings (further shameless plug - we'll have a very cool pc/mac
video broadcasting
Coincidence. I'm a fan of blip, and some others too. And as you were
composing you message, Nathan, I was checking, coincidentally, the last
40 or so uploads on blip and was bored out of my tired mind. Arggh! I'm
glad I didn't download any of them. I closed each one I clicked within
a few
good thoughts. thanks for sharing them. i think this topic will have much relevance this year... and hopefully we can get some solutions out.i must try out newest I/ON. look forward to your next release then.
this partial, ahead of time cacheing could be interesting.definately!
like Robert, I
Thought some of you would get a kick out of this video that went up at
dailymotion yesterday:
http://www.dailymotion.com/register/e8406eced56cec7d50e6eb97e/50018
It's by musician Ralph Buckley. Michael Verdi, Ryanne Hodson, Josh
Leo, Steve Garfield, Josh Kinberg and Jay Dedman make brief
81 matches
Mail list logo
