i sent an email asking to have my feeds removed
it appears that this has not been done yet
i have no intention of signing up
the next step is to send them an invoice
i think josh wolf set a good precedent at $500 (that's per video)
btw, taking down you own feeds may not be enough
to do it
good for you Harold!
i've had limited success with technorati, but got some posts to show
up. not really sure what made some show up and not others. one thing
i have found is that any flickr pic i tag with videobloggingweek2006
shows up pretty quick, so you might try that.
this has been a
Videoblogging Week 2006 was fun. If nothing else it has renewed my love for vlogging. It also showed me how many people are out there doing it now. Last year when I started it would have been really easy to keep up with everyone's vlogs, but not this year.
It's pretty exciting. I hope we make
i'm totally with you Devlon, this was a great boost
the best part is how many new vloggers I found out about this week
Devlon wrote:
Videoblogging Week 2006 was fun. If nothing else it has renewed my
love for vlogging. It also showed me how many people are out there
doing it now.
Thanks for the compliment of picking my video. For any of you who
might have wondered what I look like in front of the camera (a place
you'll rarely find me), there's more on
http://www.beginningwithi.com/aboutme/rosiefuneral.html - plus footage
of a great New Orleans-style jazz funeral.
Though I
Thanks, Halcyon. I wasn't worried about your integrity, but full
disclosure is always refreshing in this day and age!
--
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Just wanted to drop you all a note to say THANK YOU for your support of
Friday's Thai
New Year iPod Shuffle Giveaway special at 88SLIDE: The Daily One Minute
Trivia
Challenge.
It was a perfect way for our growing family to celebrate Videoblogging Week
2006.
If you didn't see the episode,
One aspect of all this that I find interesting is that the MSM itself
often gives links to such clips hosted on YouTube or whatever, without
mentioning that the existence of that clip in that place is in fact
illegal - I suppose because it's a convenient way for them to
illustrate a news story
Virtualization features in certain Intel CPUs are good, but it doesnt
change the fact that with virtual machines, the virtual OS is not
seeing all the hardware natively, its being passed-through. This has a
performance hit, and usually means some hardware will not work at all
or not all of its
The shows that are in the US such as WebJunk on VH1, I believe when
you upload the video to IFilm, which is where WebJunk gets the
videos, you waive your rights to any profits, you are allowing them
to use your video. I could be wrong on that but I am pretty sure
that is what there TOA
Okay, I watch Josh Leo's vlog religiously. However the last 2
postings for videoblogging week are exceptional.
The last one is basically me... by the glow of the iPod in bed at 3
AM
http://joshleo.com/vlog/index.php
Thanks Josh!
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the
On 4/9/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm totally with you Devlon, this was a great boost
the best part is how many new vloggers I found out about this weekYup. I'll still be watching videoblogging week videos for the next couple of weeks. Then there's the mashups that will
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to let you know we are launching our redesign right now,
so there may be a few kinks on blip.tv for the next few minutes and
then...we hope...smooth sailing and a pretty cool new look :) Thanks
for any patience, kindness, understanding as we launch this... Dina
(Mike is
Looks nice ;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, dinarebecca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to let you know we are launching our redesign right now,
so there may be a few kinks on blip.tv for the next few minutes and
then...we hope...smooth sailing and a pretty cool
Thanks! This is just the first iteration...more to come in the days
and weeks ahead...but thanks appreciate that for sure! Dina
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks nice ;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, dinarebecca dinarebecca@
wrote:
Hi
Hi folks,I'm hoping someone could tell me a couple of things about the h.264 codec that comes with QT 7.Basically my issue is that it does really excellent, small videos BUT it seems that many people can't watch the video - older computers I guess. I've done some vids with h.263, I can't seem
Hello,On 4/10/06, dinarebecca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,Just wanted to let you know we are launching our redesign right now,so there may be a few kinks on blip.tv for the next few minutes andthen...we hope...smooth sailing and a pretty cool new look :)Thanks
for any patience,
Ahh!So refreshing ;-)Serious... Looks very nice and i've been looking forward to seeing blip.tv 'come out'.Great work!sullOn 4/10/06,
dinarebecca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,Just wanted to let you know we are launching our redesign right now,so there may be a few kinks on blip.tv
Hi Halcyon,
It's your role at Veoh that was ambiguous, not your integrity. Sorry if
you feel that's the question, I don't believe you ever before disclosed
you working relationship, at least not that I recall.
You appear part of Veoh's marketing effort, your enthusiasm is so
great. And you
Thank you!! We are super excited to get out these iterations..next up
we will be doing the video browse pages...(in a few days or so...)
Thanks :) dina
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh!
So refreshing ;-)
Serious... Looks very nice and
Tell the users to try the VLC player
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
At 11:49 AM 4/10/2006, you wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm hoping someone could tell me a couple of things about the h.264 codec that
comes with QT 7.
Basically my issue is that it does really excellent, small videos BUT it seems
that
Hello,My question is Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?(People would probably call this hot linking.)NOTE: I'm NOT talking about re-hosting or transcoding. This would be getting the video straight from the vloggers site.
And more importantly, if it isn't Fair Use, should it
depends on the license of the video.On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,My question is Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?(People would probably call this hot linking.)NOTE: I'm NOT talking about re-hosting or transcoding. This would be
"My question is Is it Fair Use to link
directly to a vlog's video?"
On VlogChallenge we link directly to folks
moves, BUT they add their links so they have OK'd it. I don't agree with
hotlinking in general, so I would say, no it is not fair UNLESS you give full
and proper credit to
Personally, If a video is hosted by a service...like blip.tv, or whatever, I link to the video or use whatever embedded player might exist. If it is hosted by an individual, we typically post a thumbnail with a link to the siteI think :)
On 4/10/06, Monique Danielle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Charles,i think we had this discussion just a short while ago and it seems to be a sensitive issue. i've been contending with it myself over at loadedpun.com. basically, i try to show the video in as unaltered a state as i can.
what i tend to do is this:if the video is creative commons
On 4/10/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Charles,snip
one really interesting thing that happened during the whole veoh debacle that i hadn't considered and am considering now is that media feeds might pick up the vids and attribute them to me if they are hot linked. that's not
Hello,On 4/10/06, Monique Danielle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is Is it Fair Use to link
directly to a vlog's video?
On VlogChallenge we link directly to folks
moves, BUT they add their links so they have OK'd it. I don't agree with
hotlinking in general, so I would say,
My recent audio uploads to Ourmedia are not being returned as MIME "audio/mpeg". Similarly, *some* of my video-uploads to Blip.tv are not being returned as MIME "video/mpeg".Link: http://blip.tv/file/get/Jumplive-CCWS05LBGPSatAutographsessionSebasteinBourdais779.m4v Content Type reported:
Sounds like we need a do not vlog list like we have for our home
telephones...
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Josh.
While searching for sites for testinggrounds.loadedpun.com, I've
found tons
of vlogs listed in a
hmmm, maybe we should have a rel=no_enclosure too ;-)On 4/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/10/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Charles,snip
one really interesting thing that happened during the whole veoh debacle that i hadn't considered and am considering now is
My feed actually isn't sitting there unclaimed...the videos of mine that I
found in Veohville
were culled from other people's unclaimed feeds. They aggreed to remove them
individually
via their permalinks (they were gone in a day). I have no idea how it can be
prevented from
happening
Hello Anne,On 4/10/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Charles,i think we had this discussion just a short while ago and it seems to be a sensitive issue.It was actually that discussion that spurred this question. I am trying to look at this from the opposite angle.
Given that we think
I'm doing that. Yes, it is annoying.
I dont trust that they didnt know what they were doing and I dont
trust that they wont do it again when the stink has cleared.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, missbhavens1969
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...am I
Have you had your videos removed out of there yet or are you claiming
them and leaving them there?
david
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like we need a do not vlog list like we have for our home
telephones...
Hello,If you had control of your web server you could check the referrer url, and if it came from Veoh, then just block it.(I've heard it's pretty easy to do with Apache.)See ya
On 4/10/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My feed actually isn't sitting there unclaimed...the videos of
Hello Michael,I think you are on the right track. What you're alluding to is using Semantic HTML.(Some of you may have heard the term Micformat before. A Microformat is basically just Semantic HTML with a Specification.)
Although, just to nit-pick :-) ... It should be class=no_enclosure
I wonder... maybe Andreas can chime in... does it make any sense to modify cc licenses to include a clause about re-hosting and re-distributing media from that host? If a license can state whether or not it is allowed, then maybe that would streamline things?
sullOn 4/8/06, Peter Van Dijck
While I think that is a very good idea and appears to now be needed,
do you honestly think that would have changed matters with the Veoh
fiasco?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder... maybe Andreas can
Well, I didnt offer the thought as a what if? for Veoh... And I cannot speak for Veoh decisions.I could speculate... but their is enough of that going around already ;-)sull
On 4/10/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I think that is a very good idea and appears to now be needed,do
Hello,This is my take on it. (And sorry, I should probably just let Andreas respond) But isn't one of the things that the CC licenses is about is re-distribution. Specifically, that re-distribution is good. And that re-hosting is just one way of accomplishing re-distribution.
Now, there are
Perhaps my question was unclear - I'm aware of VLC and have many ways of playing back a variety of formats on my computer. The issue I'm having is more about makingmy videos viewable to the most people - Users might be at a library computer and unable to download or install applicationsor
Damn you. Amuse me with some speculation! I'm stuck at work and it's
sunny and 74 outside. That's like the middle of freakin summer here in
Minnesota!
David
http;//www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I didnt offer the
So, let's discuss.pros and cons to these two thoughts please1*Semantic HTML is used to specify a media link that should be used as an RSS enclosure in the form of rel=enclosure. see here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-enclosureTheir are cases when hotlinking to media in a blog post etc
http://www.wired.com/news/wireservice/0,70627-0.html?tw=wn_index_8-- Sullhttp://vlogdir.com
http://SpreadTheMedia.org
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo!
On 4/10/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, should their be an opposing rel=no_enclosure so services like feedburner
and blog engines etc can easily skip that media excluding it from the RSS
channel?
In my own scraper, if I find any rel=enclosure then I assume that all
enclosures
Hey all
Interested in coming to Vloggercon but don't want to pay for the ticket?
No problem-- we need vollunteer help!
As with any gettogether, there are plenty of things we could use a helping hand
for. From
setting up chairs, to helping at the badge booth, to just another hand to put
up
Well I think its important to remember the difference between an individual who is linking in order to 'revlog' somehting he enjoied and a comercial site linking so as to gain traffic / members.But as an individual ... sure I think it's ok so long as you obey the copyright.
When I revlog here's
On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,This is my take on it. (And sorry, I should
probably just let Andreas respond) But isn't one of the things that
the CC licenses is about is re-distribution. Specifically, that
re-distribution is good. And that re-hosting
Bethany McKenney posted a videoblogging week round-up at:
http://spadesaspade.blogspot.com/2006/04/vloggers-of-videoblogging-
week-2006.html
Check it out!!
Bethany's a student of mine and has been vlogging for the last two a
half months. I'm _sure_ she'd love some comments and feedback on her
On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Michael,
Although, just to nit-pick :-) ... It should be class=no_enclosure
(instead of rel=no_enclosure) if you're putting this on an object or
embed element. (I won't bore you with the details of why unless you ask
to
I think this is already handled by the sharealike, by-attribution thing already isn't it?On 4/10/06, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder... maybe Andreas can chime in... does it make any sense to modify cc licenses to include a clause about re-hosting and re-distributing media
I would think a transcode (especially an ugly one) is a derivative, no? I might be getting into semantics now, but...On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,This is my take on it. (And sorry, I should probably just let Andreas respond) But isn't one of the
Heading home from work in the next 5 minutes. Took a quick peek at her
site and I'll be sure to drop her a comment later this evening :)
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bethany McKenney posted a videoblogging
Yeah the creative commons license can be inserted into the feed at both the channel and the item level.creativeCommons:license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5//creativeCommons:license(namespace:
http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule)On 4/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL
-- Forwarded message --From: Chuck Silverman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Apr 10, 2006 9:19 AM
Subject: thanks for Apple Store classTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]hijust a quick thank you to you and your two friends at the Grove Apple
Store. I don't the names of the two who did most of the
Hey,
This is very strange. What's wrong with a video/mp4 mime type for a
.m4v file exactly? As I understand it video/mp4 and video/x-m4v
are both acceptable mime types for a .m4v file.
I think this is just FeedBurner being wacky. Do you have any special
settings on your SmartCast that would
Hello Michael,On 4/10/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, let's discuss.pros and cons to these two thoughts please1*Semantic HTML is used to specify a media link that should be used as an RSS enclosure in the form of rel=enclosure. see here:
This doesn't sounds like an iTunes problem.
Sounds like bad HTML somewhere in one of your blog entries.
If you have an img tag, it should end with a slash like this:
img src=http://my/image/jpg; /
XML is much more strict than HTML, and thus you must make sure that
your HTML is well-formed.
Hello,On 4/10/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I think its important to remember the difference between an individual who is linking in order to 'revlog' somehting he enjoied and a comercial site linking so as to gain traffic / members.But as an individual ... sure I think it's
On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:00 PM, mikehudack wrote: Hey, This is very strange. What's wrong with a video/mp4 mime type for a .m4v file exactly? As I understand it "video/mp4" and "video/x-m4v" are both acceptable mime types for a .m4v file. I think this is just FeedBurner being wacky. Do you
On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: This doesn't sounds like an iTunes problem. Sounds like bad HTML somewhere in one of your blog entries. If you have an img tag, it should end with a slash like this: img src=""http://my/image/jpg">http://my/image/jpg" / XML is much more
Hello,On 4/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello Michael, Although, just to nit-pick :-)... It should be class=no_enclosure
(instead of rel=no_enclosure) if you're putting this on an object or embed element.(I won't bore you
Here's the video-blog:http://sebastienbourdais.blogspot.comThere are 2 videos there..both are sitting on Blip.tv servers. They both download OK.However, the problem is with the Feedburner RSS feed. The 1st one is generating an enclosure, but the 2nd one ISN'T:Content Item: "start of Lap 1: S.
On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although asking is always nice I think it's important, especially on the web, to have automated ways of doing all this. (Like the way Creative Commons automates things.) Or else, it's just not scalable for example, how
Hello,That was my argument actually. Regardless of what the Creative Commons licenses says you can NOT do Or the fact that you have a copyright That transcoding (even though it is still a derivative) is still fair use. (
I.e., it is inalienable.)See yaOn 4/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL
On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that, from a specification point of view, the licensing in plain old RSS (without any extensions) is NOT meant to be machine readable. (Note, what I'm talking about here is the RSS copyright element.)
And a valid RSS
I can't right now, but I guess one could find out from the creative commons site what they define a derivation as.On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,That was my argument actually. Regardless of what the Creative Commons licenses says you can NOT do Or the
Hello David,On 4/10/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although asking is always nice I think it's important, especially on the web, to have automated ways of doing all this. (Like the way Creative Commons automates
On 4/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't right now, but I guess one could find out from the creative commons site what they define a derivation as.
Derivative Work means a work based upon the Work or
upon the Work and other pre-existing works, such as a translation,
musical
I just uploaded the 2nd video to my server on www.unitedoffroad.org, set the MIME settings to "video/mpeg" (m4a extension).I changed the Blogger.com post to reflect the new location of the 2nd video.I pinged Feedburner using the Feed URL.I went to Troubleshootize for the video blog..lo behold,
On 4/10/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks David. Sounds like transcode = derivation?
If so, I wonder if services that provide transcoding would require
explicit permission to transcode?
Derivative Work means a work based upon the Work or upon the Work and
other pre-existing
If you link to videos that I host and pay for bandwidththen you are stealing bandwidth. Jsut becuase a video is free to share or download, doesnt mean you are free touse (without permission) something very costly --bandwidth. In these cases of individuals hosting their own videos, you should
Here's what gets me.
It's *getting* a content type that should be appropriate. And it's
having trouble enclosing a JPG and can't tell you why.
Have you tried refreshing this feed?
Here's the relevant portion, saying Content Type reported: video/mp4
and Media enclosure not created because:
or any other form in which the Work may be recast, transformed, or adapted, sounds like transcoding to me.to my mind this does require permission. It changes the nature of the media. For example if I create an interactive quicktime movie, just trancoding it to flash will remove the interactive
Dear Video Bloggers,
Please let me apologize for any confusion and distress Veoh's
broadcasting of unclaimed RSS feeds has caused. It was in no way
deliberate.
I would like to thank you for your passion, your harsh constructive
criticism, and your patience while we continue to strive to make
This is what I was curious about. I am glad that they were thinking
forward and provided something like this. I'd hate to see a good
company doing the right thing get bogged down by this.
Another feather in the cap for blip. (ok, I am putting my blip
cheerleader pom-poms down now)
On 4/10/06,
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:33:19 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you had control of your web server you could check the referrer url,
and if it came from Veoh, then just block it.
(I've heard it's pretty easy to do with Apache.)
And it's even for the spider not to
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:53:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder... maybe Andreas can chime in... does it make any sense to
modify
cc licenses to include a clause about re-hosting and re-distributing
media
from that host? If a license can state whether or not it
On 4/10/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't agree with Devlon that a video transcode constitutes a derrivativework (IANAL!!!). Just as a xerox of a photo is a copy not a derrivativework... It's a bad copy, but still a copy. IMO.
This from the champion of interactive bloggy
On 4/10/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:53:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder... maybe Andreas can chime in... does it make any sense to
modify
cc licenses to include a clause about re-hosting and re-distributing
media
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:17:38 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, should their be an opposing rel=no_enclosure so services like
feedburner
and blog engines etc can easily skip that media excluding it from the RSS
channel?
No. I think it would confuse more than it would
hey fellas! how about starting a new thread for this discussion on transcoding? this one is getting unwieldy!On 4/10/06, Devlon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/10/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:53:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:41:50 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was interpretting the 'translation' part of the definition. I
understood
(incorrectly maybe) that a translation was a derivative. Isn't
transcoding
a translation?
Okay, I don't know about US law, but in Danish
Hello Nerissa,So you're suggesting that instead of hot linking that people should re-host the video?Because that's one of things that people here were saying was bad. And people were slamming Veoh for doing it.
(I think the issue of bandwidth would become a non-issue if there was no cost or a
Yeah, I don't know about US law either. And being Canadian I guess I
should find out about Canadian law...I am ignorant there as well. I
am just a coder that likes to videoblog ;)
On 4/10/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:41:50 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:44:32 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Fair Use overrides here. In other words, even if that Creative
Commons license does NOT allow derivative works, people can still
transcode
it. That Fair Use right is inalienable. (I.e., you
I'm pretty sure google already won some cases like this. It's image search
'transcodes' images into thumbnails and hosts them on it's commercial site..
permitted.
Flash 'previews' to see if something is worth downloading is the only
transcoding
that VEOH does. The actual files hosted for d/l
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:17:19 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?
You're asking the wrong questions. There are two questions that should be
asked instead:
a) Is it legal to link directly to a vlog's
Kudos go to Marcus Sandy and Zadi Diaz.On 4/10/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Chuck Silverman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]just a quick thank you to you and your two friends at the Grove Apple
Store. I don't the names of the two who did most of the explaining.
when you talk with them
As a result of that analysis, we have made a decision to remove any
videos published via an RSS feed that have not specifically been
claimed by the feed owner. If you have published your feed to Veoh,
but have not been able to claim it yet, it has been removed, and we
ask you to please
Here's another datapoint:I previously uploaded a video katherinelegge.m4v to blip.tv (over 3 weeks ago), it gets enclosures onhttp://katherinelegge.blogspot.comI just added it as a video to:http://jimmyvasser.blogspot.comwhere the Feedburner RSS feed SUCCESSFULLY generates an enclosure.??The
I suppose we could try changing the MIME type we report for these videos to
video/mpeg,
but that would be inaccurate. We do from time to time change our MIME settings
(particularly to add new types, but also to change to more appropriate types)
so that may
explain why some videos have worked
Sorry for the double reply.
Out of curiosity, why publish .m4v files instead of iPod-compatible .mov
files? I believe
the .mov should work fine on video iPods and they give you two distinct
advantages over
m4v files: they have an unambigious mime type and they can be set to play while
I am totally siding with Mike here. Why people publish m4v's is beyond
me. I am almost at the point that if it's an m4v file, I wont bother
watchign because I know I am going to have to wait until the download
is done.
What's the reason for an m4v anyways?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:38 PM, mikehudack wrote: I suppose we could try changing the MIME type we report for these videos to video/mpeg, but that would be inaccurate. We do from time to time change our MIME settings (particularly to add new types, but also to change to more appropriate types)
Give that a shot. I'm sure the problem is with the ambigious mime type
associated with
Apple's newly invented file extension. The only reason I can fathom that you
would want
to create a .m4v is if you were using Apple's FairPlay DRM. But I'd guess you
aren't.
Yours,
Mike
Co-founder,
my videos are down
you seem like a man of your word
see you at vloggercon
randy
From: dmitry_veoh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Open letter to video bloggers from Veoh
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:15:19 -
Hey Lukas,I still use 3ivx - it's pretty good - not quite as good as h.264 but it plays with Qt 6, plays well on older computers, and it's much faster than h.264 at encoding. I have a tutorial for it on Freevlog: URL:
Look forward to the features you're implementing and seeing you at
Vloggercon!
-- Enric
-==-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, dmitry_veoh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Video Bloggers,
Please let me apologize for any confusion and distress Veoh's
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
