I totally agree!
Creative Commons would help YouTube. I hope they can understand that
as well.
Regards,
Marco Raaphorst
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan wrote:
Nothing stopping YouTubers from putting a cc license in and around
their
works.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill had a good point. iTunes *directory* is opt in. Most of us did it
by default when setting up our feedburner feeds. I don't recall ever
agreeing to any terms of service with apple though that compromised my
god given right to
Jay, you might find this interesting.
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/commons_without_commonality/
Trine
On 1/29/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LucasGonze said:
The problem is that videobloggers are going down the same hopelessly
unrealistic and ultimately
On 1/28/07, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im not sure Id agree that a sense of victimization or righteous anger
are the primary driving forces behind such things, but they are in the
mix somewhere when it comes to reactions of music
On 1/30/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about your feedburner point, but I'll take your word for
it. The only reasons I got involved with feedburner was to format my
feed to go to iTunes and for (24-hour after the fact) stats.
That's a great point you have about
On 1/28/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, micropayments, that favorite topic of mine! Way back when, long
before blip, I tried to build a micropayments service with a few of the
folks now at blip. The challenges we saw then are the same challenges
we see now: in order to do
beautiful Vlog (made with a still camera) by Michael Szpakowski from
DVblog.
Self Portrait on my 50th Birthday, Walking from Harlow to Bethnal
Green along the Rivers Stort Lee
http://tinyurl.com/2w4dys
silent, 13.4MB
c, doron
On 1/29/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apple has a link to our website on our podcast page at the iTunes
Store
apparently they are. last i checked i didnt see linkbacks. has this been
the case for a while now?
i dont use itunes much so I was taking mike meiser's word for it. good
On 1/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apple has a link to our website on our podcast page at the iTunes
Store and we get lots of traffic from them. If it wasn't for Apple
we wouldn't have the advertisers that we have today. We also have
lots of comments on our Apple page
I woke up this morning to find this in my inbox;
Jeff Pulver is normally a very clever guy who started VON among other
things so this is obvioulsy legitimate just sounds/reads a bit weird.
just passing it on.
Cheers
Dean
Tomorrow morning I will be announcing an internet video contest
Dont get me started. Their whole approach repeatedly winds me up, I
suspect partially because Mr Pulver is used to moving in circles that
are in awe of his name and his past reputation, and so when talking to
content creators who may be unaware of this, comes across as arrogant.
Network2 earned
Have had some bank-and-forth with Jeff and Chris Brogan.
Invitations and offers of assistance from Pulver. I told him I'd come to his
VON conferences if they paid my expenses.
Told them The Faux Press would cover 'em for $5k / week.
No go.
I've decided what my time and energy are worth.
But that would actually involve understandinf web 2.0 and the
long-tail, so dont hold your breath.
Sometimes I feel guilty about singling them out for my moaning, but
then they say something like 'anybody into video needs to be at our
conference' and all the guilt disappears.
According to words
I admit to using it to watch video. Its not the best experience but I
am not totally satisfied with the other video aggregating apps either,
and as I often have itunes open to listen to music, it seemed convenient.
I can certainly appreciate the anger about their non-inclusion of the
accompanying
Please Im begging someone to respond to my point about creative
commons material needing to be available for download redistribution
in order to stay true to the cc license.
So whilst the specifics you mention are true, its not just about
giving additional rights to youtubes partners. Its about
On Jan 30, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
He could be right but personally I laugh at this in disbelief...
You laugh in his general direction?
Ref: Monty Python Holy Grail Scene 8
http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/grail/grail-08.htm
Ha!
That's classic.
--Steve
--
Steve Garfield
So now it's uncool to have a contest to promote Internet Video?
Let me ask you, Steve, which at least appears to be more helpful:
hosting a contest or throwing out attack after attack after attack?
I think we responded appropriately to the concerns raised by
videobloggers, and we certainly
Network 2 reacted appropriately after behaving inappropriately.
The contest is fine. Not my cuppa, personally, but there's nothing
ethically wrong with it.
Full disclosure when it comes to marketing activity is a good thing.
People having a choice when it comes to their participation is a
OK Ive read the rules now.
The advertising starts working for network2 the moment people start
posting entries, because they are encouraging people to post their
videos that mention network2 to all the various hosting sites.
Your entries remain your property but network2 get perpetual rights to
Hello,
I wouldnt recommend anybody else engage in my sort of bitching, if I
could help myself then I would.
The contest is one thing, its the attempts to pretend its all about
promoting internet video in general, rather than network2, that makes
me open my stinky negative gob.
I do thank you
If you want to make it even easier for people to go to your site and
comment when they watch your film in iTunes, you can add a clickable
link at the end of your Quicktime video, which people in iTunes can
click on to take them directly to your site. Hardly anyone does this
that I've seen
This may be a repeat email. If this email comes first however, I may
have figured out how to streamline the yahoo group system. If not,
back to the drawing board.
I sent the below to take you up on the bitching Steve because I just
cant let you get away with it all alone ;) Im serious
You are assuming that the vast majority of people out there WANT to
have their media other than the old wayold habits die hard, and
old media did not get old by not adapting..and the better
technology does not always win...
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In
Response from VideoRonk:
Considered usuary.
Videoronk is a finder that obtains the videos of youtube, google
video, blip, metacafe, dailymotion, myspace, vimeo and revver. We did
not lodge any video in our systems. They are these finders to which
you would have to go so that they retired your
Sorry, Mike, I hadn't read what you'd written - just Steve's reply.
I should have been clearer. There *are* links back to your website
in the fucking interface :-), to allow you to read and comment.
If you click on the top line of each subscribed podcast in the
podcast section, a little
What's wrong with contests are they are hierarchical and exclusionary but
definition, unless you structure them differently.
Give $1K to the first 40 vloggers who show plane fares bought to the
conference location and dates.
I absolutely think contests are uncool.
Popularity is not a measure of
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Notes from Steve, the self-proclaimed authority on videoblogging(who
has been talking about starting his own for over 2 years now). Lets
strip out all the nonsense and get right to the points Steve was
The error appears to be that Steve takes on the credentials of an
expert without sufficient expertise and knowledge. The broadness of
his conclusions and underlying assumptions of guilty before proven
innocent show assumptions that are unproven taken as true without real
proof: platitudes.
--
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about your feedburner point, but I'll take your word for
it. The only reasons I got involved with feedburner was to format my
feed to go to iTunes
Interesting points, Jan, and I appreciate your opinion. Contests do
have a way of picking a winner, which makes them a zero sum game, as
Covey calls it.
What do I value? Participation. I love community when it is positive.
(It's a personal flaw of mine that I don't do negative very well. Yes,
I
I don't believe that contests necessarily have to be zero-sum. If
there's adequate promotional opportunity for all participants (or at
least those participants who have something of a quality entry) they can
avoid being truly zero sum games.
-Original Message-
From:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [chrisbrogan.com] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting points, Jan, and I appreciate your opinion. Contests do
have a way of picking a winner, which makes them a zero sum game, as
Covey calls it.
A contest is not necessarily a zero sum game. A content
Is that not a criticism of Steve's criticism. The argument of
trusting a critic more doesn't follow.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it was a ;) joke, but he's really not like someone without
kids giving advice to their friends on how
Isn't that the beauty of blogging, videoblogging, podcasting, photo
sharing, etc? Doesn't it give us the power to see for ourselves?
Though my friend Geo often says that photographs perfectly capture
moments that never existed.
--Chris...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL
SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE,
SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH INDIVIDUAL TO
THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW.
Yikes!*
This contest is obviously taking place in the big-league ballpark.
Just to enter I'd have to have a lawyer review these terms and advise
on my
I think much of the criticism against me is fair enough. I deserve
what I get, and Im sure I sound like a terrible negative critic much
of the time.
It seems like a fair point to note that I dont videoblog myself,
that should definately be taken into account, although personally I
dont
Though my friend Geo often says that photographs perfectly capture
moments that never existed.
Well, this explains why I have the great urge, and often do, edit
photos. The editing turns the documentation of the moment into an
illustration that tells a greater truth than the photo could on
its
Is it? Doesn't it? I'm not clever enough to follow your logical
outflanking of me. The only point I was making was that we shouldn't
be making judgements about people's 'expertise' and thereby telling
people we won't respect their opinion, based on their vlogging
productivity. A keen
It appears that the problem is that basically anyone can create an
aggregator and pull feeds from it. Unless there is something done that
prevents this, this is going to happen more and more.
In this case, for me, it's the Blip feed that is being ripped. To have
them stop displaying my videos, I
Just read an interesting post on NewTeeVee about CNet's efforts to
incubate videoblogs with cash grants. It sheds a little more light on
the Project Spotlight campaign they announced last year -- for one
thing, that Schlomo is involved, whom I mainly know from reading his
posts on this list.
Great! Notes from Steve, the self-proclaimed authority on
videoblogging (who has been talking about starting his own for over 2
years now). Lets strip out all the nonsense and get right to the
points Steve was trying to make with Jeff Pulver's offer to give away
$40 thousand dollars to a
Thanks for the kind words, but please dont take this as me going
away because ive been criticised, fairly or unfairly. I just got
self-concious that I may be damaging the group, and that I should
chill out a bit. As far as Im concerned, people should feel as free
to criticise me as I criticise
That is bad ass!!
Go Schlomo! Very exciting stuff.
-halcyon
On 1/29/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/26/cnet-video-incubator-getting-started/
Looks like Schlomo is working on a pretty cool project.
see, I like it when money is available for people
I got to listen to about 30 lawyer jokes in the taxi last week with
the guy who helped write those terms in the back seat, adding his own.
(I'm not a lawyer- not smart enough). The thing about contests where
you give away money is that you have to cover all the bases.
Do you know Christopher
Just to be clear, this is a contest with the goal of promoting
Network 2.
It's absolutely awesome that you're putting your promo dollars back
into the community, but the part where it says you have to mention
Network 2 makes it clear that you are doing a Promo for your company
and not a
David,
We will block these guys on our end if we have to.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue Jan 30 10:59:46 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc
Thanks Mike.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
We will block these guys on our end if we have to.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Has the ZR500 gotten rid of any remaining problems between the ZR series and
Final Cut / iMovie?
I'll admit I haven't used many of the newer ZR series cameras, but the older
ones made me want to cut my eyes out when trying to make them play nice with
FCP.
If Verdi's using one, I guess it must
Good point, Rob. I guess we could be more explicit. I figured that by
making it a contest put on by Network2 where we ask you to mention
Network2 in the branding, that'd show we're also promoting the site.
But perhaps I could've been more explicit. Live and learn.
Yes, we are definitely looking
I'm looking for an LA based video blogger/blogger ( music focused) to appear in
a blogger
round table for AOL Music in LA in the next day or so. Anyone interested or
know of
someone?
Please let me know via list or off list at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Mary
Steve, I actually find your input very useful, because you often enough
write what I'm too busy to find phrasing for. This group doesn't need
to become an echo chamber of constant happy agreement.
Please, keep testing us. It is the only path to truth.
Well, I for one was not dismissing his arguements. I wholeheartly
agree that sometimes a person outside can bring tremendous
benifit.and I can choose to listen to it or not, but sometimes it
just felt like arguing for the sake of arguingbut regardless he
acknowldged that perhaps he
Thanks everyone for the kind words. It's a grand experiment that I
have been lucky enough to help bring to fruition. The article pretty
much says where our heads are at... funding videos that have some sort
of story arc (be it fiction or non-fiction). This includes
documentaries to dadaist
I figured out how to email through, perhaps.
If your reply-to-email to the videoblogging group has all the html
stuff on the side bar that Yahoo sticks on the email, such at the
recent activiy side bar, colorful sponsored links etc, then I
guess the email will get clogged up while Yahoo
some may find this interesting or useful
some may find this humorous
had to happen sooner or later :)
http://trafficgeyser.com/
---
Markus Sandy
http://feeds.feedburner.com/havemoneywillvlog
http://feeds.feedburner.com/apperceptions
http://feeds.feedburner.com/digitaldojo
I'm going to try setting up presentations on the Saturday
Videoblogging FlashMeetings. The idea is that whatever you do,
whether videoblogging, creating tools, offering services (commercial
or non-commercial), you may ask to present on a Saturday.
1) Show what your doing and where it's
but...but...but..what happens if I don't want to show up in search
engines under the term san diego trial lawyer?
Oh wait, because of my trial lawyer video, I come up 5th when you
google lets go to vegas!!!
It worked!
Schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
Laugh all you want but I am getting this, soon everyone will
know The Batman Geek and then I will have producers and fans and
people who love me because I am famous, THAT's real love you know,
not that artificial stuff you get from friends and people who take
the time to get to know you.
Steve writes;
Anyway Ive been a bit overactive here recently so I think I should
give you all a rest from my incessant ranting for a while. Sorry to
Steve, I find your comments here stimulating and always a thought
provoking addition to the discussions. When I hear a name like
Elbows I'm already
(Have you ever read the Terms and Conditions on the 3,044 websites
you've signed into? Blech.)
I've been on the internet since 1993 and I've only had time to read
the ToS at 23 websites, and signed up at only 7 of those.
John (they never did let out of remedial reading class) Leeke
Mike writes:
We will block these guys on our end if we have to.
I noticed that they were prominently displaying the Blip logo, and
wondered if you already had an agreement with them.
Thanks for all your good works.
John
Theres no business
like SEO business
thats no business at all
its almost enough to start me drinking
stop thinking
before my soul returns a 404
This and other classic tunes are available on a CD that represents
$5000 worth of value, if you sign up today.
Okayyy, my mind is melting, where is
Yeah that seems like a possible factor. My approach is not to use the
yahoo group via email at all, I do all reading and replying through
their web interface.
Although things may be especially backlogged or get-stucky right now
as I keep seeing messages appear on yahoo saying that they are
Good idea Enric
Ilt will be great also if each vlogger logged in flashmeeting with
Name ( or nickname), town, Country or state
Best regards
Loiez
Le 30 janv. 07 à 18:48, Enric a écrit :
I'm going to try setting up presentations on the Saturday
Videoblogging FlashMeetings. The idea is that
LOL!!! Thank you Steve!
On Jan 30, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
Theres no business
like SEO business
thats no business at all
its almost enough to start me drinking
stop thinking
before my soul returns a 404
This and other classic tunes are available on a CD that
Yeah that is a great idea.
Maybe Chris fro Network2 can join in.
-Lan
www.LanBui.com
On Jan 30, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Enric wrote:
I'm going to try setting up presentations on the Saturday
Videoblogging FlashMeetings. The idea is that whatever you do,
whether videoblogging,
Nice, I like that. Liked the video too, to mix the subjects together,
would you ever wear clothes with a creative commons logo on them? :)
Also I dunno what I thought I read when Jay posted that message about
the creative commons stuff at the April superhappyvloghouse, somehow I
thought it was
Hey everyone that freaked out about Network2, you forgot to freak out
about this competition!!!
They disguised it by not calling it a competition but if you look
closely it really is!!!
Someone tell Schlomo, and make sure Mike Hudack hears so he can save
us from this one too!!!
-Lan
that's no mess - that's beautiful! the power of Play Doh!
On 30 Jan 2007, at 20:33, missbhavens1969 wrote:
After the last yahoogroup discussion re:CC post-roll stuffs I decided
to make one of my own.
It turned out kind of a mess lighting-wise and camera-wise (damn cat
knocked over the tripod
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/283309
A round up of the TOS of Ourmedia,Internet Archive, YouTube, Google, Blip,
Yahoo etc
There is an excel version at
http://www.techsoup.org/binaries/Files/Video-Sharing-Terms-of-Service-Comparison-Chart.xls
a backgrounder at
I wouldn't have a problem making a video talking about how I watch internet
TV I do it in a number of ways, and it has made a big impact on my life.
(Heck, I videoblogged my proposal! if that doesn't show you i like
videoblogging, I don't know what does.) my issues lie here:
- making videos for
We do not have an agreement with them. Purely a defensive move on their
part.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of johnleeke
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:09 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging]
It's another contest. I just became aware of it when a friend emailed
me about it. In case anyone is interested, here's the link:
http://www.thelot.com/ Seems like there's lots of contests popping
up. This one's got a million dollar development deal as the prize.
Old school, huh? Why not
I figured out how to email through, perhaps.
If your reply-to-email to the videoblogging group has all the html
stuff on the side bar that Yahoo sticks on the email, such at the
recent activiy side bar, colorful sponsored links etc, then I
guess the email will get clogged up while Yahoo
Josh, I think you and some others here are able to articulate specific
arguments against contests in ways folks can understand. I'm not up to the
task.
Competing against one another doesn't cut it any more - not in a community
like this. Either everyone who wants to win will win, or I want no
that's awesome bekah... hopefully more people will create their own
and link them to the Creative Commons wiki page so that other people
can use them...
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking_work
it takes less than a minute to register in order to edit this page...
hopefully someone will
I just posted a vlog about my sundance experience this yr : taxiplasm.net -a
little fucked up, but wutevs.
-brian (taxiplasm)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/27/07, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are at Sundance right now and just spent a long, tiring day yesterday
trying to get here,
This sounds like great fun, can't you preload files into the meeting
area during the meeting so that we don't have to go to sites outside
the discussion area, I know you can with photos, how about videos?
Paul
On 30 Jan 2007, at 23:01, videoblogging@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Re: Saturday
Did anyone see Starting Out in the Evening or The Savages?
:)
Jan
On 1/30/07, brian gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just posted a vlog about my sundance experience this yr : taxiplasm.net-a
little fucked up, but wutevs.
-brian (taxiplasm)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/27/07, J. Rhett
David I have a polite disagreement with your statement about no one
caring about this situation. This is the kind of situation that will
help test the value of a CC license agreement. For me it is also the
eternal balance between my life and vlogging. Sometimes I gotta make
room for the analog
Ive started to hunt for info about them on the internets.
So far Ive learnt that the developer is Spanish, I dont know where
they are based, and that ronk might mean masturbate in norwegian.
For all I know the site might be supposed to be called videorank but
got lost in translation somewhere.
What's wrong with you people? That site is offering a geyser of
traffic. Don't you know what that means? It can't be the first
definition, a hot spring intermittently sending up jets of water,
because nobody wants intermittent watery traffic. It can't be the
second definition of a hot
To have them stop displaying my videos, I will have to remove
them ...
Please don't do that. You can't let someone else's nonsense deter
you from pursuing your creative outlet, even if they're misusing your
material and presenting it in ways totally anathema to you. You
can't let that stop
What's wrong with you people? That site is offering a geyser of
traffic. Don't you know what that means?
Maybe geyser is a good term because their first proud example of San
Diego Trial Attorney no longer ranks very high.
Internet Geyser (defn): Ranked on Google's 1st page one day; gone
HELP I have tried everything. I have visited help forums, I have
combed the Blogger Help section, I have poured over OPTs (other
people's templates) and for the life of me I cannot do it! I cannot
add a labels section into my sidebar. I can labels the posts, sure, I
spent the better part of
http://flashmeeting.open.ac.uk/fm/flashmeeting.php?pwd=7d8cf4-7151
Jan
--
The Faux Press - better than real
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. For me, I have to consider switching to a traditional license. I
don't want to do that - I love the idea than some of the videos are
being used by non-profits for their purposes.
There has got to be a license for what I
With all this discussion of CC licence, I was
wondering, what do videoblogging members do when
adding music to films. Do you create your own? How do
you source your music? How do you refer music? Do you
abide by the law?
Personally, I use ccMixter material only, I can not
make my own music at the
It's not my intent to give the impression that Steve should not
participate.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it? Doesn't it? I'm not clever enough to follow your logical
outflanking of me. The only point I was making was that we
Bill, I think that's exactly right. While there is a great deal of education
that needs to occur around CC licensing, I'm not sure that's the issue at
play here. Videoronk is pulling videos from all over the place - they
certainly aren't all covered by CC.
And frankly, I'm a little concerned
I don't think the issue is advertising. If it was there wouldn't be an issue
since ads with video is now fairly commoditized technology. I think the bigger
issue is credit and respect for the terms of the cc license itself, which can
put restrictions on commercial use and require proper
And I'm saying I think we have the tools to correct that ourselves which in
the long run will better serve us than hunting down every aggregator out
there that doesn't take upon themselves to do so. There's just no way to
keep up. Let's build players that include attribution and links directly.
The FlashBoard feature will take jpg files that can be uploaded by a
registered participant during the FlashMeeting. The person booking the
meeting can, before the meeting, upload a series of jpg files that can
be assembled into a presentation, for display via the FlashBoard
during a meeting.
A
My thoughts about a traditional license was that if I had to fight to
prevent uses in situations I didn't want my videos to appear I would
be on established legal ground.
From a practical standpoint it would be easier to convince a judge my
rights instead of educating him/her on CC licenses.
HI EVERYONE.
its time to go public with the DIY ANIMATION WORKSHOP VLOG.
I have been producing a 30 minute mix mash show on public access and
online for several months. as of now, i am launching a new, more
more frequent project. so check it out and spread the word:
Building players that include links and attribution directly is great,
but for blip it's not a complete solution since we need to support every
format under the sun (from divx to mp4) in order to ensure content
creator flexibility and device / platform compatibility. So while we
may build a Flash
I have Snapz Pro installed on my Mac. It captures any video playing on
the screen as a Quicktime file. I can then import the file from my
desktop into iMovie and do with it what I like.
I used some in a VHS tape I gave to a few friends at New Years.
Previously, I've simply filmed videos
Based on the reply that Gena got back from them, what I meant was that
I would have to remove the videos from Blip to stop them from
displaying them.
If I dont do that, I will possibly have to put an intro on my videos
stating that unless you are viewing the piece from any of the sites
that I
I see... You're not talking about prevention. You're talking about
recourse.
Prevention could (hypothetically) consist of either something in the
feed that blocks aggregators from slurping videos from your feed or
something visual in your video that alerts potential aggregators that
there are
Or of course you could just work with people tring to standardise all
meta data for video which would include a license portion.
Dean
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see... You're not talking about prevention. You're talking about
recourse.
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
