On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:29:35 +0200, Charles Hogan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious,what is going on in SantaCruz with Ashcroft ? the Feds have
pulled the plug on that server you can no longer connect to that link
Since this is not vlogging related the political discourse should
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:06:10 +0200, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We need guides, manuals and how-tos covering fields within
videoblogging. Just like we have freevlog.org (which continues to get
praise, and I say it again: THANK YOU Michael Verdi and Ryanne Hodson
for this
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:15:33 +0200, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chuck or anyone else who wants to mess with the blog can just log in:
username: admin
password: vlog05
A friendly warning, Raymond. Anyone who logs in can execute arbitrary PHP
code on your server. I would
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:36:00 +0200, Cheryl Shuman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you guys heard of this? It's the future according to all of the
entertainment industry execs?
You need cheap disc and consumer-oriented (that means cheap) burners.
Neither are here.
- Andreas
--
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:16:20 +0200, ro9core [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell me about it. How do you access this Atom API? From where? I
take it you can query the feed for different properties? Or is it
more like a blogger or buzznet API where you send rpc calls?
It's a REST based API to
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:54:16 +0200, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyway, some possible sub-groups that could evolve out of this one:
And before someone goes out and creates all these groups keep these things
in mind.
- The forum vs. e-mail discussion has surfaced more than
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:52:56 +0200, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Someone has to host it/set it up (probably not a problem)
It will become a problem. Bandwidth costs for high volume forums are not
to be underestimated. Remember that there is a lot more fluff on a
webforum than
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:54:15 +0200, Clark ov Saturn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if crime drops at all as a result of more and more people
having cameras (especially video) on their phones, etc. Remembering
incidents like the old Rodney King police brutality issue (among
others)
I'm in agreement with Duncan, that this seem redundant, but I can comment
a bit on Steve.
In the original Dogme movies the director was not credited in the film. Of
course you still knew that Vinterberg did 'The Celebration', Von Trier did
'The Idiots' and so on. But that was because you
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:06:56 +0200, Chris Nolan.ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was good to know. My brother made a post today (
http://justnolan.ca/archive/ID/4 ) which is a 360 view that you can
move around in, in Quicktime VR format. I was pleased to see that ANT
and FireANT both
Checking RSS feeds just got easier. A long time ago Clint sent me some
great code to use on vb.info, but I only got it implemented now.
Go to: URL: http://www.videoblogging.info/tools/checkfeed/
There you can enter the URL of an RSS feed. The script will then check:
- If the feed is
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:17:37 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
General fair-use question: if I'm videoblogging inside a car, and the
radio is playing, am I legally bound to turn the radio off before
turning on my camera?
General answer: It depends.
Depends on (among other
Add:
padding-left:0;
padding-top:0;
to catch all browsers.
- Andreas
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:56:33 +0200, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Change your CSS to this:
body {
top-margin:0px;
left-margin:0px;
/* you can also do margin:0px; to set all margins */
background-color:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 06:17:54 +0200, jadly6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob check your link...
To avoid links breaking in e-mails you enclose them between URL:
So this url:
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2005/08/what-would-you-pay-to-place-
ad-on.html
would be written:
URL:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:34:41 +0200, Pat Cook (Jeeper One TV)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want it inside the BODY. I want the BODY and the SIDEBAR to
be on top of it.
Add background-image to the body. Set the background-color for your blog
body and sidebar to some solid colour.
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:40:08 +0200, petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am working on supporting rel=tag in Mefeedia (like Technorati
does), which will make things much easier hopefully. Sull/Ro are
right, you should be able to just tag in 1 place.
And that place should first and
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 05:23:15 +0200, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
made changes to the rhizome movie. Andreas has also written a way
cool thingie to autogenerate a xml file, however will be a while
longer before i figure out how to read multiple entries from xml
Yeah, small
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:33:30 +0200, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You know I'm only joking when I say something like this is retarded
(i never said *you* were retarded :-)
Touché. :o)
Fortunately we're all friends here!
What is needed for this to happen is a standardized data
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 02:53:57 +0200, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vlog/vog/rhizome/rhizome2.tgz
URL: http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vlog/vog/rhizome/rhizome2.zip
Awesome. Looking forward to trying this out for non-test videos.
I updated the XML
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:34:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7. hot-linking with an http://http file structure to hide source of
video
when pulling from another domain.
been curious about this one. feel free to explain ;-)
Not completely sure what Andrew is talking
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 14:56:13 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you ever *bought* music, and by bought, I mean bought the full
rights to any music to do as you please? Most times you are licensing
it. CD's you buy at the store? You don't own those, you don't have the
right
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:37:00 +0200, duncan speakman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is this possible?
to create a feed that doesn't contain any reference to it's originating
site?
Don't listen to Josh. :o)
The channel level link element (The URL to the HTML website
corresponding to the
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 18:52:52 +0200, duncan speakman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The channel level link element (The URL to the HTML website
corresponding to the channel.) is *required* in RSS 2.0.
is there a way to spoof this.. i.e. to put in a different url to the
one that is actually
On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 04:06:42 +0200, Pat Cook (Jeeper One TV)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah no sh*t. Who in the world has copyright over that title. :-(
AOL/Time Warner does:
URL: http://www.snopes.com/music/songs/birthday.htm
It's big bucks:
According to David Sengstack, president of
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:48:19 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you considered adding a 3rd child for the use of an audio file that
could optionally play behind the 2 visual children?
Using a demo version of LSP I modified Adrian's movie to take an audio
track. The
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 05:20:19 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so whats next making a rhizome generator so users can customize the
xml
name and location?
i'm trying to figure how how to get rhizome script to parse variables and
make the xml name/location dynamic.
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 05:01:53 +0200, Pat Cook (Jeeper One TV)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leave it fuckin' AOL to take something like Happy Birthday and
copyright it for fuckin' profit (Sorry, I don't buy the so-called
private charity bullshit). :-( :-( :-(
Would you relax. AOL didn't
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:07:20 +0200, Jack Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good Morning to All was written in 1893. In 1935 the Hill sisters sued
for copyright (42
years after the fact and it is not even clear that they wrote the new
words to the song
(Happy Birthday to You). The last
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 22:26:57 +0200, James A. Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
copyright
The content on the YouTube Website, including without limitation the
text, software, graphics, photos, and videos (?Content?), is owned by
or licensed to YouTube, subject to copyright and other
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 01:44:16 +0200, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm surprised this thread isn't miles long by now.
Don't videobloggers love talking about themselves?
I do.
Yay! I was waiting for your list. :o)
My disclosure? I voted for the socialist party in the last election.
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:02:29 +0200, DrLinton Hutchinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who out there will answer stupid videoblogging questions OFF LINE as
not to necessary bother others as I get up to speed? Email me
If you don't want to bother the whole list there's the vb.info support
forum
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:12:36 +0200, Christopher Bergeron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling that if the Video Ipod becomes as
popular as the MP3 IPod the standard that will emerge
could very well be QT, although in the end I don't
really care what the masses choose as the standard
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:43:38 +0200, Clint Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So when people have valid information in a press release that would be
applicable to us they should rewrite it? Got it. So MeFeedia, FireANT,
etc, are fine, but companies announcing other products are bad? Seems
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:09:53 +0200, Michael und Susi Videoreporter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now here's my question: is there any good way to include clickable
links into ourr videos, or will we have to fall back upon the text
entries in ourmedia.org.
If you only need one link there's:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:38:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, many people will find Soft-Core path to be suitable
whether
reasons are money, time, goals
Hard-Core Vloggers are very serious about pushing the 'everyone is a
publisher' concept as far as
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:31:50 +0200, Chris Baudry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Even in a private environment you need to have people sign a form
agreeing
to be filmed. In the case of the yoga classes we had all participants
sign
the document before the class... except one student who
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 19:56:19 +0200, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a
hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time
someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT
file ping a
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:53:23 +0200, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I see that working for Rocketboom, but how would that work for
someone making a personal slice of life kind of videoblog?
If someone collaborated with me on this http://www.etherworks.ca/
journal.shtml it would
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:26:44 +0200, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally, I don't really feel comfortable with the idea of video
files with scripting and side effects anyway. How long before the
first Quicktime virus brings it all tumbling down ?
QT's interaction with your
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:50:53 +0200, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My last professional writing assignment was to go down to a bank and
write a story about how the bank communicated to its new employees that
it was genuinely concerned about his or her welfare. Doing that made
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:02:05 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/gdrmain.htm
I've been introduced in a more contemporary context with organizational
communication through Lars Thøger Christensen and George Cheney. Auto
communication and the
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:29:38 +0200, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Item contains more than one enclosure. But I like having an image
link to the movie, I'm not sure what to do.
Plain vanilla RSS only allows for one enclosure. If you want more than
that (and you do) you have to use
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 05:36:55 +0200, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Some time ago I'd been curious about podcasting
so I installed a plugin called MT-Enclosures.
http://brandon.fuller.name/archives/hacks/mtenclosures/
Josh Kinberg from this list wrote an
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:33:27 +0200, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But do sources and storage facilities of feeds like FireAnt,
ourmedia.org, archive.org and iTunes use this imbedded metadata for
keywords that one might use in a Search? I don't think so right?
I don't know who uses what.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:20:56 +0200, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the Show Movie Properties entry dialog box. Can only the
author change those? What's to keep anyone from changing all that
after they save a download?
Certainly anyone with Quicktime Pro can change those
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:31:42 +0200, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my own view is that outside of system level data
(date/time/size/format and so on) structured metadata a la semantic
web model will die the death of a thousand cuts. folksonomies are
more usable and robust and have
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:42:28 +0200, Jack Olmsted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see that you figured out how to work around long URLs - cut/paste
the two halfs into the address bar.
Actually, you can help out. Enclose your long URL between URL: tags
like this:
URL:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:43:25 +0200, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Id far rather the content producers took responsibility for metadata,
yes the tools need to encourage this. Quicktime 7 is better than 6
when it comes to metadata viewing and editing, but its still not the
most
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:58:06 +0200, Siobhan Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I want to create is a movlog. In both Mambo and
Wordpress. Now I can get emails with attachments into
both Mambo and Wordpress via plugins. What I can't do
is display them as thumbnail and onclick a new
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:39:29 +0200, naschmult [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. I bought Quicktime Pro to edit and compress and export my mpeg 1
video into quicktime. However when I try to file-export movie to
quicktime.. It doesn't save my freakn' audio from the video clip!!
What the
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:29:40 +0200, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ideally, low quality would go hand-in-hand with a low file size;
otherwise I'd just mess it up with some crazy pixelation/distortion
effects.
Yeah. :o)
So I go to QuickTime Expert Settings, choose 8
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:15:30 +0200, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not sure what the killer features are. Anyone want to explain? I don't
see it. Flash is not
going to go away, and it may be best right now for a lowest common
denominator
solution, but I can't see how Flash will
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:47:16 +0200, akonix_dmitry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have sent out one email to our [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, announcing the
launch of our video uploader. The only emails on our list are people
that have sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If your name is
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:09:27 +0200, James A. Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you can check this video please... and let me know what you think.
I think I have to back down on the frame rate.
http://madlymedia.com/DUMMYshow4.mov
57 megabyte for 3 minutes of video? I'm not as worried
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:49:29 +0200, James A. Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The data rate was set at 750. What do you reccommend?
Personally I prefer 20KB/s (160kbit/s). I think Freevlog talks recommends
75KB/s (600kbits/s). Again, I think 600kbits/s is too much. To me the
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:08:27 +0200, chrbaudry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been trying various blogging software. Some do not offer
Pinging, others offer the possibility to Ping sites chosen by the
user. What do you do and what works best?
If your blogging software don'e offer pinging,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:17:45 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but when would one need/want to 'ping'?
For instant gratification. If you're using Feedburner you ping them when
you post a new entry. That way they'll update your feed instantly instead
of whenever
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:08:24 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am all about the instant gratification :)
It's all the rage this century. :o)
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
SPONSORED LINKS
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:09:01 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) Is pinging different than resyncing at feedburner?
I don't use Feedburner, so someone else will have to answer that...
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 03:50:25 +0200, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK everybody. I think I finally got the message.
One last important thing. The signature seperator must be two dashes, a
space and then a newline (look at my signature). This is the standardized
way of doing things, and it
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:09:22 +0200, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com/2005/08/greenthing-no-26-faux-press-fairytale.html
I want to see this, but the movie link redirects me to some domain renewal
page!
- Andreas
--
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:37:32 +0200, D.ROB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need some advice on getting started...what is the minimal amount of
equipment needed and the best place to vlog for free? Help.
Minimal requirements: A webcam and a computer.
My minimum recommendation: A digital camera that
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:19:43 +0200, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i deleted the post i put on with ms word (thanks bill), didnt get the
error
mssage. i reburned it but i dont have my rss thing in the bottom of my
blog
page ?? i should of saved loseing my mind till this moment
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:54:05 +0200, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
any idea why i get this message?
The URL you entered does not appear to be a valid feed. We encountered
the
following problem: Error on line 114: The prefix o for element o:p is
not bound.
You didn't specify a
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:25:55 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Multimedia Acrobat and/or deriviate software would be nice to see on the
marketplace. It would be feasible to distribute vlogs within these
'wrappers'.
This may be stupid (but I can't see why). But why not slap a
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:44:19 +0200, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wondered how the museum would feel about his vlogging in there. I
guess it's a risk to break the policy of your employer, but I feel
kinda sorry for Dalas' getting resigned for it.
He's a dumbass. He didn't read
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:19:39 +0200, videoblogging@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Should messages about the nation's deadliest hurricane in
more than a century that relate to video reports on the web
be posted to this group?
A new poll has been posted: Should members be forced to rephrase polls
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:46:33 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put up some information on playing videos in a web page (DIV
tag) without opening a new page. I think this is similar to videos
running on Steve Garfields site, http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/
(though with less
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:28:29 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, that is interesting. Where do you have a sample of the code
in use?
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ on all video entries. E.g. URL:
http://www.solitude.dk/archives/20050801-0452/
My usage of onclick does work on IE,
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:07:23 +0200, Jakob Lodwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'd looked at that page. I feel like your help here was much
more clear than that document. I'm sure your busy (anyone as
knowledgable as you must be), so thank you so much for your time and
help.
It takes way
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:57:52 +0200, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are knieve.
And before more people use words not in my dictionary:
- Keep discussions civil. Go after the ball, not the man as they say in
soccer. Namecalling is not cool.
- Keep discussions on topic.
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:14:30 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is what videoblogging can do. Future generations will consider
videoblogged
news to be more legitimate than institutional media.
Why?
- Andreas
--
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media,
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:28:47 +0200, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is? I'm getting an index page.
We decided to move hosts right away. Re-uploading files and DNS changes
means that the downtime was a bit longer.
- Andreas
--
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media,
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:21:45 +0200, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a lawyer. If you are giving away another person's 'property'
for free, wouldn't they have to show some injury to collect monetary
damages? I don't doubt that they could get some sort of restraining
My questions spawned a lot of replies. That's great, but it also gives me
trouble when I want to reply to everything. I think I'll start out easy...
Charles Hope:
Oh, but it does. If the medium is expensive, only well-funded
institutions can
produce. If it's scarce, there are few
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 05:46:16 +0200, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the most part, i see most videoblogs as being extremely open,
sensitive, and believable.
But they might as well not be. It is just as easy to tell a lie on a
videoblog as it is to tell one on tv. Videoblogging isn't
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:46:34 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's it, isn't it? I'd rather get the story from a local blogger than
the most
highly decorated war correspondent. The latter is and will always be an
outsider.
What if we tried the dictum All News is Local on
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:25:43 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see why an angle isn't a objective element. It's an
objective truth of one's values, sensibilities and perspective gained
from living. It just needs to be understood as what it is -- a
individual system of values
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:32:18 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Very cute example. But what you want is a Danish person living in the
US, who
sees the event from as closely as possible, preferably one who was
involved in
the event. As opposed to a Danish reporter who happened
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:22:01 +0200, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reputation much the same here is my sense of it. they have
interesting design gimmicks but Nokia have the best usability I've
found and Nokia or Sony Ericsson I think have the best reputation for
actually lasting...
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:43:17 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i dont think fireant intends to release code nor should they if they
plan to work out business strategies.
When the first versions of ANT was being developed we were told it would
be open source. The
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:12:16 +0200, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which to me would mean I can put FireANT on a CD I gave away, or put it
on a web site for people to download, as long as I didn't sell the CD or
charge for the download. It also suggests I could make no changes to it
I think I misinterpreted. Pete wouldn't be allowed to make modifications
like a rebranding. Everything else is fine.
- Andreas
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:38 +0200, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:12:16 +0200, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 05:42:04 +0200, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i read that huge thread that steve watkins started on FireANT.
not sure where that came from.
I don't know why it got so long either...
not sure where this conversationwe havent said open source and
ANT in the
Like Josh IANAL, and you should contact a real lawyer for legal advice.
Whats even worse is people mixing the two. Am I right to say that if
someone uses copyrighted music in their videoblog, and then they use a
creative comons license for their videoblog, its invalid?
If you're using the
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:20 +0200, Steve Garfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My suggestion is to post the videos on your blog on a regular basis
with text associated with each video to give background, additional
info and your feelings about each segment.
Everyone follow Steve's advice here.
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:24:41 +0200, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The main problem Ive found is that your feed only contains the wmv
version of the videos. This is a problem in general at the moment,
most feedtypes only support 1 enclosure per post.
Can nybody advise on the best
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:04:58 +0200, IsaiahNine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for the veterans: How come you guys don't embed you videos into the
vlog? Instead of uploading a graphic then having it open in a
player? I'm sure their is a reason just don't know what it might be.
Loading the
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:05:56 +0200, Jake Ludington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's very possible you are butting up against the maximum upload default
of
either PHP or Apache. PHP has a default file size limit for HTTP uploads
defined in the php.ini file on your server. Apache as a
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:37:31 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being a Blogger blog gives you no advantage in any search results,
including Google's. Assuming that is naive. MSN Spaces gives you no
advantage in search over other blogs on MSN Search, either, because the
search
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:07:00 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was amazed (though by now I shouldn't be) at some of the cluelessness
of the slashdot crowd... I mean, they are supposed to be a geek crowd.
Maybe they are, but they sure don't think in revolutionary ways when it
It's time for a repeat: URL:
And I forgot to paste in the URL (aren't I the clever one):
URL: http://www.human-dog.com/lab/?p=57
- Andreas
--
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:29:17 +0200, strollingbones2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I watch them in the webpage, they look horizontally stretched.
The screen is simply not the same shape.
object data=http://members.cox.net/anikaeckl/intro.wmv;
type=video/x-ms-wmv width=320 height=240 /
The
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:34:31 +0200, dsdietzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm really taken aback at how sensitive the subject of QuickTime can
be with some users. I think QuickTime is a fine option for the
delivery of content. The notion that it is somehow superior is simply
not true.
Andrew
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:15:15 +0200, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would, too, and imagine it will come as vlogging moves into the
mainstream
consciousness. We have movie critics, TV critics, and book critics - why
not
vlog critics?
Everyone is a critic. That's how
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:07:55 +0200, Dan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Quicktime it's posible to create a movie ( my vlog ) that
incorporates files or portions thereof found on a network ( the
internet ) through url referencing. Is it okay to do this for purposes
of quoting other's vlogs?
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:35:08 +0200, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
most of us dont embed the videos in the page because:
1. there is no obvious permalink to the video.
2. it doesnt show up in RSS feed for syndication.
(someone correct me if im wrong)
While you're not wrong per se...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This makes no sense at all. In fact by your own definitions you
don't get the right to
assert that you are a videoblogger. If I consume your video posts
exclusively through
iTunes or Fireant you're saying it isn't a
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:57:09 +0100, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I think this what is problematic with the semantics. Virtually all
videblogs are
vodcasts in a strcit sense.
No, almost all videoblogs - *right now* - *can* be used as vodcasts. And I
failt to see why that's a
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:34:03 +0100, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I was not trying to put down a definition. I don't know where you
got that idea. A definition would include other factors that exclude
1 - 100 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
