On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:47:23 +0100, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally got to read this again... I find it extremely
interesting... I'd love it if you guys Enric and ANdreas sited
sources... You're dealing in some interesting and heady terminologies
and ideas... I realize you
I have been testing Google Video some more.
So far, the video compression is really bad.
Has anyone seen a nice looking video on Google Video yet?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
typically they play the videos much larger than their original
resolution, so some distortion is inevitable when viewed at that size.
-josh
On 12/31/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been testing Google Video some more.
So far, the video compression is really bad.
And that's why I don't like it.
A lot of web video wasn't made with full screen in mind.
It was made for 320x240 or similar.
I understand what they're trying to do, make the computer screen more
like the tv screen, but I'm disappointed at how they're doing it.On 12/31/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been testing Google Video some more.
So far, the video compression is really bad.
Has anyone seen a nice looking video on Google Video yet?
I suspect they're using the Flash 7 compression which is
Also superceded by compression in Flash 8, but you need to upgrade
Flash plugin to view it.
-josh
On 12/31/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been testing Google Video some more.
So far, the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i told you, man vsocial, yo. vfuckingsocial. =)
Indeed.
Although it does take quite a while for my videos to be ready for
viewing. But that's pretty understable, I guess.
Edmund
I finally got to read this again... I find it extremely
interesting... I'd love it if you guys Enric and ANdreas sited
sources... You're dealing in some interesting and heady terminologies
and ideas... I realize you don't pull them from blogs or the web...
in fact I assume you've been
On Dec 25, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Enric wrote:
Yes, I see the future as untethered where our knowledge, interaction
and work follows our activity. A scenario of this: We can be at home
in the business room working on a product, paying bills, and notice a
interesting vlog episode. Mark that vlog
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally got to read this again... I find it extremely
interesting... I'd love it if you guys Enric and ANdreas sited
sources... You're dealing in some interesting and heady terminologies
and ideas... I
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 25, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Enric wrote:
Yes, I see the future as untethered where our knowledge, interaction
and work follows our activity. A scenario of this: We can be at home
in the business room working
wow, when will this end
On 30 Dec 2005, at 22:34, Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 25, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Enric wrote:
> > Yes, I see the future as untethered where our knowledge, interaction
> > and work follows our
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a video that hotlinks into my site that is a complete package:
http://blogs.opml.org/andrewBaron/
Don't know if this will translate onto the message board, but all you
do is enter this code
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Edmund Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is hysterical.
and i totally back vsocial. they get it.
Is there any limit for how large your files can be? Or how much you
The video roll feature is cool, thanks for the continuing video
innovation. I've had parellel ideas for an application wrapper to
video formats. This inspires me to try things out in flash.
:),
Enric
-===-
http://www.cirne.com
Determine Media
--- In
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 27, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
First things first: Michael Sullivan said what I wanted to say, 100%.
Steve, the only ammendment to what you wrote below is that the
reciever
has a
Labels, schmabels...make some tech...make some tools. ;)
Totally agree with this.
-Josh
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
HELL YES! I've registered yesterday and have happily intergrated the
videos uploaded on vsocial onto my blog. I definitely love the
results. I loe you vsocial! Where have you been all my life OMFG!
Edmund Yeo
http://swiftywriting.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon
On Dec 29, 2005, at 8:10 PM, Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 27, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
First things first: Michael Sullivan said what I wanted to say,
100%.
Steve, the only ammendment to what you
i told you, man vsocial, yo. vfuckingsocial. =)On 12/29/05, Edmund Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HELL YES! I've registered yesterday and have happily intergrated thevideos uploaded on vsocial onto my blog. I definitely love the
results. I loe you vsocial! Where have you been all my life
There are certain elements that can be integrated within the video that have
blog attributes -
using sprite tracks (I believe this is exclusive to quicktime), chapters and
href tracks.
Comments are another matter. I think you're onto something though - although
now it
requires a certain
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, I leave you guys alone for a couple of days and you're STILL
wallowing
in definitions.
I'm glad you're having fun with it, but would be comforted by a few
clear
statements that even though this group is
I posted a video that hotlinks into my site that is a complete package:
http://blogs.opml.org/andrewBaron/
Don't know if this will translate onto the message board, but all you
do is enter this code anywhere, and the video appears with all its
comments, tags, etc. as part of the work:
embed
that is hysterical.and i totally back vsocial. they get it.On 12/28/05, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:THAT VIDEO IS CLASSIC!...And vSocial is a good example of blog stuff in video.
-Matt--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posted a
I used to work with the company behind what was then called Throttlebox, a media wrapper technology for the Entertainment Industry.Here is a page with info that is amazingly still up:
http://www.creativenewmedia.com/Services/throttlebox.htmAt one point, they had contracts with several labels
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is hysterical.
and i totally back vsocial. they get it.
Is there any limit for how large your files can be? Or how much you
can edit per month?
I use boltfolio (http://www.boltfolio.com), which is kinda
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, I leave you guys alone for a couple of days and you're STILL
wallowing
in definitions.
I know you're probably kidding. But I do think there's value in
exploring the different technical and theoretical
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference in this example is the RSS Feed is not utilizing
the item
'enclosure' to syndicate the video away from the blog post
instead the
RSS Feed is used to alert a subscribing audience that their
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's clear as day to me.
I guess it depends upon the weather...
You don't need a weather man
To know which way the wind blows
Subterranean Homesick Blues
- Bob Dylan
;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need a weather man
To know which way the wind blows
But if you do:
http://whetherman.blogspot.com/
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But if you do:
http://whetherman.blogspot.com/
I love this guy!!! I'm kinda addicted to it.
schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, johngaltsjournal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love this guy!!! I'm kinda addicted to it.
Me, too.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
Sounds like a matrix developing...or Epsilon Construct (calling Eric
Rice...)
;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you call it if there is no blog, just a feed with videos,
but the videos are interactive and among other things include links
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 27, 2005, at 10:23 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
enhanced vodcast
I guess what I'm talking about is putting the blog into the video.
Can a blog be in a video?
-Verdi
I don't think so. A blog is not time
I think people too often confuse the what is a videoblog question as
though it has something to do with the style of content (or the
contents of the content). I would say that videoblogging has nothing
to do with content and everything to do with medium.
videoblog = video + blog
so the question
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will,
you are wrong.
Andreas is right.
Michael you're wrong.
Will is right.
...because I say so.
--
Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml
Wouldn't a futurecaster
Here we go with the semantics again. Perhaps the root of the problem lies not in definitions but in the name of this group. It seems logical (to me, at least) that videoblog does indeed = video+blog. Therefore we're talking about video attached to/embedded in a web page, with RSS. comments and
Wouldn't a futurecaster know best?
LOL!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This makes no sense at all. In fact by your own definitions you
don't get the right to
assert that you are a videoblogger. If I consume your video posts
exclusively through
iTunes or Fireant you're saying it isn't a
Very well said. While I understand the desire to define
videoblogging, it seems that a tight definition will exclude or
intimidate some people who are trying to express themselves in this
medium. Part of what attracts me to videoblogging is the wide
diversity of expression that I find. A
On 12/24/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think Tivo is Television.Classical television cannot not beautomaticaly stored, retrieved, scanned and viewed out of order (this
can be manually performmed with programming recorders -- but justabout anything can be put into a manual
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This makes no sense at all. In fact by your own definitions you
don't get the right to
assert that you are a videoblogger. If I consume your video posts
exclusively through
iTunes or Fireant you're saying it isn't a
I think you've had too much cough syrup...
What is your definition of videoblog? I have yet to see a congent one. If I
post a video to
my web site is that all of a sudden a videoblog? Or do I need a sidebar with
links too? Or
do I need tags too? Do I need to allow comments to have a
Yes, I see the future as untethered where our knowledge, interaction
and work follows our activity. A scenario of this: We can be at home
in the business room working on a product, paying bills, and notice a
interesting vlog episode. Mark that vlog episode to take along -- it
goes onto a
This may be true in your own mind but apart from this insular community,
videoblog clearly
has a personal connotation inherited from the word blog. Ask people who have
no idea what
a videoblog is. As you stated most people perceive blogs coming from an
individual voice.
In a strict
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No. I was not trying to put down a definition. I don't know where you
got that idea. A definition would include other factors that exclude
Deperate Housewives in a blog template (because they are not read as
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I was not trying to put down a definition. I don't know where you
got that idea. A definition would include other factors that
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:57:09 +0100, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I think this what is problematic with the semantics. Virtually all
videblogs are
vodcasts in a strcit sense.
No, almost all videoblogs - *right now* - *can* be used as vodcasts. And I
failt to see why that's a
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:34:03 +0100, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I was not trying to put down a definition. I don't know where you
got that idea. A definition would include other factors that exclude
Look up semantics...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:57:09 +0100, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I think this what is problematic with the semantics. Virtually all
videblogs are
vodcasts in a strcit
Ho, Ho, ho!
VIA:
http://tinyurl.com/9ovn6
How to locate the direct URL of a Google Video:
Go to Google Video and find a video.
View the page source code and search for the keyword ‘googleplayer‘.
Copy and paste the videoUrl parameter (all of the characters after
the keyword ‘videoUrl=’)
Press
you are either missing the point or choosing to ignore it.either way, respectfully, you are still wrong.now where is my DXMOn 12/25/05,
wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look up semantics...--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 25 Dec
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:17:13 +0100, Mike Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/24/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Tivo is Television. Classical television cannot not be
automaticaly stored, retrieved, scanned and viewed out of order (this
can be manually performmed with
or install this greasemoneky script which does all that for you and
provides a nice download link on the page so you can click and save
as
http://www.joshkinberg.com/blog/archives/2005/11/greased_google.php
-Josh
On 12/25/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ho, Ho, ho!
VIA:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:17:13 +0100, Mike Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/24/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Tivo is Television. Classical television cannot not be
automaticaly
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:07:51 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The factor of compelling is larger and different on a large monitor or
screen at a distance. This allows an immersion and presence for the
media piece not presently available on computer screens. What is
missing is a
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:07:51 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The factor of compelling is larger and different on a large monitor or
screen at a distance. This allows an immersion and presence for the
I understand the point - I'm justing trying to challenge it because I don't
ascribe to the
McLuhan medium is the massage worldview which seems at the root of the debate.
In my assessment, the same video played in different contexts does not
necessitate new
designations for each context.
A
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the point - I'm justing trying to challenge it because
I don't ascribe to the
McLuhan medium is the massage worldview which seems at the root of
the debate.
In my assessment, the same video played in
The social experiences in each of these contexts you describe is very different.
The audio waveforms may not change, but your experience does.
-Josh
On 12/25/05, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the point - I'm justing trying to challenge it because I don't
ascribe to the
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:40:41 +0100, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the point - I'm justing trying to challenge it because I
don't ascribe to the
McLuhan medium is the massage worldview which seems at the root of the
debate.
In my assessment, the same video played in
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The social experiences in each of these contexts you describe is
very different.
Exactly.
From a piece I wrote on the video iPod:
[The video iPod's] interest lies in its capacity for qualitatively
changing the way
honestly, whatever thoughts I have regurgitated are not via McLuhanistic backing.I do like some of McLuhan... in particular my favorite quote is: The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born
Only because it echoes my experimental
I don't think Tivo is Television. Classical television cannot not be
automaticaly stored, retrieved, scanned and viewed out of order (this
can be manually performmed with programming recorders -- but just
about anything can be put into a manual process.) So I think this is
an intermediate medium
This makes no sense at all. In fact by your own definitions you don't get the
right to
assert that you are a videoblogger. If I consume your video posts exclusively
through
iTunes or Fireant you're saying it isn't a videoblog it's a videocast???
Conversely, if you published epsiodes of Punky
Will,you are wrong.Andreas is right.I have also been conveying the same thoughts for months.That is why in the debates on definitions and language, I had pushed for the realization of two terms to use.videoblogging and vodcasting (aka video podcasting, video on demand)
Most videobloggers have a
Will,
you are wrong.
Andreas is right.
Michael you're wrong.
Will is right.
...because I say so.
--
Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference
i dont trust a guy with blue hair.LOLg'nightOn 12/25/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Will,you are wrong.Andreas is right.Michael you're wrong.
Will is rightbecause I say so.--Vlog: http://www.kashum.comFeed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml Yahoo!
it's like this.millions use the internet. they use it in 2 primary ways. email and web browsing. even the email is often done in the web environment. RSS equally can keep the focus in the web environment as it is used to syndicate content across the web on sites who aggregate that content.
69 matches
Mail list logo
