between different regions while atomic gas is able
to change into the new fractional values or DDL unopposed.
Fran
From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 5:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
Ok, cool.
Ok, cool. That is where we differ.
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Yes, isotropic.
>
>
> 2014-04-29 18:44 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart
>
> >:
>
>> Isotropic?
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Vacuum? What kind of vacuum? If you are talking ab
Yes, isotropic.
2014-04-29 18:44 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart :
> Isotropic?
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> Vacuum? What kind of vacuum? If you are talking about field theory, yes,
>> sure, but that is "potential" energy. It can be set to 0. But, there is the
>> vacuum fo
Isotropic?
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Vacuum? What kind of vacuum? If you are talking about field theory, yes,
> sure, but that is "potential" energy. It can be set to 0. But, there is the
> vacuum for GR, the lambda. Which is small... really small...
>
>
> 2014-04-29 18:3
Vacuum? What kind of vacuum? If you are talking about field theory, yes,
sure, but that is "potential" energy. It can be set to 0. But, there is the
vacuum for GR, the lambda. Which is small... really small...
2014-04-29 18:38 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart :
> Do you think we have vacuum in our atmosp
Do you think we have vacuum in our atmosphere ?
If yes, do think it is smooth and isotopic ?
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Ok, I misinterpreted you, I thought you said he thought it was good enough
>
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha
> >
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I read
Ok, I misinterpreted you, I thought you said he thought it was good enough
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Yes, I read that, but I don't agree with him. It's not convincing because
> he is used to a great precision, but I, that I am not used to that, think
> it is good enough.
Yes, I read that, but I don't agree with him. It's not convincing because
he is used to a great precision, but I, that I am not used to that, think
it is good enough.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Funny, his words are different then your interpretation (
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/opod.htm): To me he is saying they are "not
convincing". Excuse the weird font, I pasted from his site.
However, ray tracings using them are not convincing. ..
They would require different simulation approaches
Maybe, why not? These days we can film while watching the final image.
Besides, he says there were 2 pictures known. So, we also could also
consider that he did not see while not watching with his eyes first. As for
the physicist, it seems that while not reproducing exactly, it was good
enough. The
Are you saying the camera lense created the phenom and that the
photographer did not see it with his own eyes first?
The physicist is even saying he cannot recreate the scene with his optical
halo program using flattened pyramidal crystals
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
And also aligned with the photographer...
2014-04-29 17:31 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart :
> Right, it is not an arc, it is a cusp of vacuum energy, gravitationally
> aligned with our solar brane.
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> This is probably due the camera, an not the s
might have surprises!*
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message ------
> From: *ChemE Stewart*
> Date: Monday, April 28, 2014
> Subject: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
> To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com"
>
>
> http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illu
Right, it is not an arc, it is a cusp of vacuum energy, gravitationally
aligned with our solar brane.
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> This is probably due the camera, an not the sky, due the V shape, which is
> not an arc, which is usually as seen on sky.
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Ro
or these pillars and to some extent also for
elliptical halos themselves. *
*Look carefully at sun pillars - they might have surprises!*
-- Forwarded message --
From: *ChemE Stewart*
Date: Monday, April 28, 2014
Subject: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
To: "v
This is probably due the camera, an not the sky, due the V shape, which is
not an arc, which is usually as seen on sky.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Radiation Jets= condensed vapor on the wings of 2 air planes. ( or if you
refer the long tail from the sun to W, mutilple reflections within the lens
until hit the photon detector)
W= lens flare, specifially, Glory,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glory_(optical_phenomenon) , more
specifially, acircu
Thanks, I had looked at that one. Conventional physics will tell you it is
all done from hexagonal ice crystals. They don't necessarily tell you how
they all form/align to create the beautiful gravitational lensing patterns.
They ALSO MAGNIFY
Amazingly these two ice halos beautifully match the
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:45 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> More brane leakage from the other side...
>
You'll love this one:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/04/27/halos_and_arcs_optical_effects_photographed_by_g_ran_strand.html
More brane leakage from the other side...
http://inspirehep.net/record/811530/plots
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Eric Walker*
Date: Monday, April 28, 2014
Subject: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:29 AM,
:* MarkI-Zeropoint
> [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2014 7:51 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
>
>
>
> That's easy!
>
> ;-)
>
>
>
> Red
displacement or event horizions occurring in NJ so what
was he trying to say?
Fran
From: MarkI-Zeropoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 7:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
That's easy!
;-)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Roberson wrote:
A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the
> CMB.
Another thought -- we assume that because conservation of energy is borne
out experimentally on the local scale that it also applies to the cosmic
scale. But
e worthy for the
> astrophysics guys?
>
> Finally, I had a problem visualizing the thinness of the mirrors in a
> real experiment. Also that they apparently reflect from both sides
> equally.
>
> Bob
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *To
That's easy!
;-)
Reduce the turbulence in the stream, which for the Dirac Sea, means
using an intense electric or magnetic field to polarize the vacuum...
-mark iverson
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie ca
s in a real
experiment. Also that they apparently reflect from both sides equally.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
http://physicsworld.com/cws/
t; >
> To: vortex-l
>
> >
> Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 5:51 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
>
> Dark energy is likely the source of the force which drives stars apart.
>
>
>
: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 5:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
Dark energy is likely the source of the force which drives stars apart.
Dark energy is likely the source of the force which drives stars apart.
reedom of movement by
> expanding the region that it occupies. This process should result in an
> expansive force.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ChemE Stewart
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 4:25 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the C
Stewart
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 4:25 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an illusion
in 3-space except for gravitational effects
In addition to gravitational effects I think
1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an
illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects
In addition to gravitational effects I think it is electromagnetic (think
magnetosphere) and weakly ionizing/decaying 3-space (think ionosphere) and
electromagnetic/lightning
Could the dirac sea also explain the observed red shift?
Harry
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for
> this premise:
>
>
>
> 1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an
> illusion
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/nov/17/how-to-turn-darkness-into-light
Photons are formed from the vacuum as a part of the virtual particle
formation process. But do photons give up vacuum energy if they
annihilate with their antiparticle? Does the photon have an
antiparticle(antipho
Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for this
premise:
1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an illusion
in 3-space except for gravitational effects
2)The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter
3)CMB is not a relic of a
Good question. If dark matter and dark energy exist then they must have
consequences. The researchers may have been looking in the wrong places thus
far.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 2:06 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Is the CMB
http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html
On Monday, April 28, 2014, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* David Roberson
>
>
>
> A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the
> CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and
From: David Roberson
A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the
CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and
is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large massive
objects. I have long wondered how this congreg
and high temperatures as with ordinary matter.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 11:33 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
The link you noted for the Fi
Here is a paper which assumes the temperature of thermal
motion of Dirac sea equal the temperature of Cosmological Microwave
Background... if there is a valid mathematical connection, then at least the
prima facie case has been made.
http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
The link you noted for the Finders University discusses process physics,
but I did not see anything about the microwave background radiation coming
from a Dirac sea. Is there a separate paper that is more explicit?
I have confused notes on the origin
To:
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 7:08 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea?
Poser of the Day ...
Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is almost universally assumed
to
be the photon remnants which are left over from the "Big Bang" of
cosmology.
That assum
That's right. I think our weather contains decaying strings of vacuum in
the jetstreams attached to our earth d-brane, which "inflate" into
supercells (closed strings) of decaying vacuum which ionize and condense
everything and produce water vapor and precipitation. The vacuum streams to
Earth in
This is one of the main reasons for the theory of inflation.
2014-04-28 11:08 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene :
> we should detect a fairly uniform relic
>
>
>
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Jones,
I think you are right and it is also responsible for a part of the normal
background radiation here on Earth, which increases slightly during many
storms, many of which I think are caused by an increase in local vacuum
energy and not just hot and cold. We were born into a world where "space
Poser of the Day ...
Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is almost universally assumed to
be the photon remnants which are left over from the "Big Bang" of cosmology.
That assumption has more holes than Swiss cheese. Compounding one error in
another is the best that can be said for it.
ht
46 matches
Mail list logo
