Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

ether is Boscovichian particles known a long time; as part of ignored/forgotten history when attention of physics community diverted onto Einstein will be in my talk based on abstract http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/AndertonX.pdf Boscovich theory 1758 Vigier conferenceVigier 9 |   | |   |  

Re: [Vo]:more patience. anticipating the ERvVReport results

>>>Can you explain please the connection of birds, coconuts, Camelot? Coconuts were used for sound effects on radio as sound for horses.The film was too cheap a production, couldn't afford horses so replaced them by coconuts.It was then pointed out that in the medieval times of Camelot in

[Vo]:Re: [usa-tesla] 5 things Einstein got totally wrong

>>>I have an issue with symmetrical time dilation which seems to defy common >>>sense . I myself became confused on the issue the problem is that there is a contradiction in the maths as I show at- Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton |   | |   | |  

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive Rises Above Pathoskeptic Dirge

The puppies are influenced by Einstein. I go back to old physics: 18th century when unified theory of Newtonian physics was presented by Boscovich: where has extended Newton's theory so now repulsive as well as attractive force in operation between particles. Boscovich been used by Feynman,

Re: [Vo]:Let's continue to think about passive vs active approach to LENR 's existentil problems

>>>And there you have it!  WTF!  Is the whole “science” establishment so filled >>>with cowardice or dominated by ‘physics as a religion’ that no one will do >>>or discuss anomalies? Exactly, but I am not afraid of speaking out. Physics has probably got too complicated for them, and they have

[Vo]:Preferred frame exists

Preferred frame exists - Joao Magueijo Published on Jul 10, 2016Joao Magueijo gives a talk and says preferred frame exists, this appears contrary to what many relativists say.Preferred frame exists - Joao Magueijo |   | |   | |   |   |   |   |   | | Preferred frame exists - Joao Magueijo |

Re: [Vo]: The life and death of Eugene Mallove

my perspective on this sort of thing-- That was 2004. Over the next 11 years, the question of who killed Mallove would lead Curtis down a path he never expected. Mallove, the detective discovered, was one of the world’s most outspoken advocates for cold fusion. “It’s science

Re: [Vo]:I calculated his power output from his own data. It is veryexciting and he may have something real that he is blundering with. Seebelow.

>>>Just because I do not spoon-feed you examples of people who use the legal >>>system to steal and commit crimes, that does not mean they do not exist. Unfortunately the "people" that would say that a crime has been committed by the legal system would generally be the "people" that the

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Einstein messed things up. Energy is some sort of scalar of some sort of a vector quantity. When you have mass [M] multiplied by some sort of velocity [v] by velocity [v] again. The velocities are vectors, so you either have vector product and scalar product from that, or you are looking at

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

>>>I am fighting for the right to think differently History as I present: Copernican Revolution led to Existential Crisis; physical reality based on point-particle theory of Boscovich. Most people were not able to cope with that and had to retreat from full consequences of Copernican

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

ution from Boscovich. On Monday, 12 September 2016, 14:59, ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: >>>I am fighting for the right to think differently History as I present: Copernican Revolution led to Existential Crisis; physical reality based on point-partic

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

New Scientists just gets lots wrong and keeps repeating its mistakes ad infinitum example: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106321-reality-guide-the-essential-laws-of-cosmology/ New Scientist: "Back in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell was melding electricity and magnetism into one unified

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

physics is f**ked On Thursday, 22 September 2016, 21:55, ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: very bad idiots. one math error "they" make is highlighted  at following link with lecturer still teaching it in lecture to students- Maths contradicti

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

>>You can't just apply SR in the curved spacetime around a gravitating mass and >>get the right answer. ah relativity "they" have done the math wrong see: Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton | | | | || | | | || Maths

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

ime in arguments in the relativity news groups.  Some people just don't understand the math of SR and will never believe that it works.) On 09/22/2016 04:15 PM, ROGER ANDERTON wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Article: This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics, physicist claims

unified field theory as extension of Newtonian physics was presented in 1758 by Boscovich; from which quantum physics was developed: >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic |   | |   | |   |   |   |   |   | | From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum

[Vo]:ANPA

if anyone is interested, this group has relaunched itself on the Internet ANPA (Alternative Natural Philosophy Association) Conference 2016 has now finished Next year Conference 2017 is provisionally planned for: Monday 7th – Friday 11th August 2017 preferred, possibly 1 week earlier. at:

Re: [Vo]:new EM Drive paper

Unified field theory was presented in 18th century by Boscovich; Newton's laws had to be updated as per latest paper for Vigier Conference. However most people suffered from Existential crisis from Copernician revolution hence why unified field theory was beyond their mentality. Latest talk at:

Re: [Vo]:Accuracy of Carbon Dating

Einstein went off on research into unified field theory which mainstream ignores, but which some researchers have continued to pursue, and such bodges as constancy of lightspeed get updated anyway see:http://www.unifiedfieldtheory.co.uk/ also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zF7DZoQgig

Re: [Vo]:More on automation and Martin Ford

>>>The future of the laundry worker is not to work for a laundry boss with a >>>thousands of machine. It is to own a thousand of machine, like a Roman >>>citizen was owning slaves. the word "robot" has its origins from word "slave" The word robot was coined by artist Josef Čapek, the brother of

[Vo]:unified field theory talks

Unified field theorytalks Lewis, E. The EightyYear Periodicity of Scientific Revolutions and What It Means for the ColdFusion Field  in ICCF - 14 InternationalConference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2008. Washington, DC.Says: “In 1820, Faradayintroduced the basic ideas of field theory

[Vo]:Re: [usa-tesla] Fw: [teslafy] Reconstitution of Relativity

relativity believers are making numerous mistakes such as math mistake highlighted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXLtoJ0DKoQ While big conceptual mistake by mainstream physicists is to mostly forget that unified field theory published in 1758 by Boscovich; as used by Tesla et al

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

as I point out in my talk : the Copernican revolution led to an existential crisis and the full implications of the unified field theory published 1758 most people found themselves unable to cope with: Introduction to Boscovich talk by Stoiljkovich + existential crisis in physics R Anderton

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

>>>The problem now-a-days is that the R persons foster mistakes, since more >>>mistakes mean more money to make more mistakes.  same method as used by mainstream theorists: keep piling on mistakes to existing theories to create things like dark matter, dark energy et al that  then need more

Re: [Vo]:Google translation of an electrochemistry paper

world's go mad re: what's happening in US politics anyway see my unified field theory website: http://unifiedfieldtheory.co.uk/ I got the unified field theory it was published in 1758 and others have worked along similar lines; a tradition of physics that's different to mainstream also my 

Re: [Vo]:Non polar magnetic repulsion

79/n4554/abs/179284a0.html On Mar 9, 2017 16:33, "ROGER ANDERTON" <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: >>If we understand the mechanism of the repulsion between particles... again with things that are consequences of Boscovich's theory published 1758. The doctrine of atomism

Re: [Vo]:Non polar magnetic repulsion

>>If we understand the mechanism of the repulsion between particles... again with things that are consequences of Boscovich's theory published 1758. The doctrine of atomism led to Boscovich's point-particles, where since there was no contact between particles everything had to be explained by

Re: [Vo]:Large list of Rossi Patents -- Exhibit 29

theories take longer The history of science is replete with theories that only became accepted by the scientific community after a long and protracted uphill battle.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2373380/ unified field theory published 1758 >From Boscovich's theory to modern

Re: [Vo]:Allais Effect

Bob, Munera paperInterconnection of all Forces of Nature via the Energy and momentum equations for a fluid aether at:

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

I mean by the mainstream relativists, "they" have got it wrong when "they" teach it On Monday, 17 July 2017, 22:58, ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: all based on misunderstanding relativity due to translation errors as I shall point ou

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

That's the sort of thing they muddle up; they say that then go on to start talking about warp spacetime, empty space having the properties of a medium and faster than light (FTL) et al. On Monday, 17 July 2017, 23:27, "bobcook39...@hotmail.com" wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

all based on misunderstanding relativity due to translation errors as I shall point out in my next physics talks. On Monday, 17 July 2017, 22:55, Kevin O'Malley wrote: On 7/17/17, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote:   Bremsstrahlung is

Re: [Vo]:The Papp engine and cavitation

nology there is alien signals being picked up by SETI but "they" ignore them. My talk: SETI ignoring ETI signals Roger Anderton 1st June 2017 | | | | || | | | || SETI ignoring ETI signals Roger Anderton 1st June 2017 Tesla and ETI Music talk by Roger Andert

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

5 Jul at 5:50 PM  said :   So much drama fornothing... does that count as sneering? On Wednesday, 12 July 2017, 0:35, Jed Rothwell wrote: Che wrote:  Who sneered? Who are "they"? - Jed What? You calling me a liar? Okay, have it

Re: [Vo]:Allais Effect

Boscovich aether was never disproved. Unified field theory from the classical wave equation: Preliminary application to atomic and nuclear structure Héctor A. Múnera1,2, a) AIP Conference Proceedings 1753, 030015 (2016); doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4955356 AbstractIt is postulated

Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden

wrote: My reply accidentally went to Roger's personal email address. Eric -- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden To: ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> Hi Roger, I

Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden

>>We would ideally not attract pugnacious participants Galileo was pugnacious On Monday, 3 July 2017, 16:11, Eric Walker wrote: Hi Kevin, On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: You have a perception of someone who claims to

[Vo]:SETI ignoring ETI signals

SETI ignoring ETI signals Roger Anderton 1st June 2017 | | | | || | | | || SETI ignoring ETI signals Roger Anderton 1st June 2017 Tesla and ETI Music talk by Roger Anderton 1st June 2017 Alien signals based on old physics pre-Einstein being i

Re: [Vo]:Article: This Overlooked Theory Could Be The Missing Piece That Explains How The EM Drive Works

is connected to Einstein, and showing the contradiction in the mat... | | | | my latest talk: Boscovich Unified field theory and Atomism given by Roger Anderton 28 aug 2017 | | | | || | | | || Boscovich Unified field theory and Atomism given by Roger

[Vo]:Talk on unified field theory

My talk at Physics Conference: where I point out the problem with modern physics as: "they" omit teaching unified field theory to physics students. Unified field theory presented in 18th century Boscovich Unified field theory and Atomism Roger Anderton 2

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

missed out unified field theory presented in 1758 >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic | | | | || | | | || >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoilj... "From Boscovich's theory to modern

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

was Boscovich theory. On Friday, 29 September 2017, 20:58, ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: missed out unified field theory presented in 1758 >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic | | | | || | | |

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Hi Nigel Thanks. Physics education has been dumbed down and there now needs to be a revolution in Science/Physics to get things back on track. My latest talk at: Boscovich Unified field theory and Atomism given by Roger Anderton 28 aug 2017

[Vo]:Latest talk: Boscovich's 18 th century theory gives the link between electrical interactions and gravity:

Latest talk: Boscovich's 18 th century theory gives the link between electrical interactions and gravity: https://www.youtube.com/edit?video_id=wAPrJCl9u-s_referrer=watch Theoretical confirmation of the gravitation new origin having a special electrical nature with Coulomb law corrected-

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

Bohr supposedly said variants of: We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr As regards the mess in physics; Bohr, Heisenberg, Feynman etc were all working

Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

>There are countless examples of "science" excluding different thinking. This >is what prompted Max Planck to write that progress in science occurs "funeral >by funeral." He explained: “A new scientific truth does not triumph by >convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but

Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

OHO).   Bob Cook                                                 From: ROGER ANDERTON Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 3:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; c...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries   >There are countless examples of "science" excluding different thinking

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

NASA has funded antigravity resarch, but what is missing is any announcement of big success. Anyway, unified field theory research gets mostly ignored; started with Boscovich (1758), how gravity is a residual of electricity from Boscovich theory explained at: Theoretical confirmation of the

Re: [Vo]:Podcast of interest

>>black hole. Crothers points out what mainstream says about black holes doesn't make sense: Stephen Crothers on Black Hole`s | | | | || | | | || Stephen Crothers on Black Hole`s Viva la Modern Physics, the monster keeps rolling | | | | On

[Vo]:Latest talks on antigravity

Latest talks on antigravity at: https://www.unifiedfieldtheory.co.uk/page-2 CY LO, DAVID P. CHAN & RICHARD C. Y. HUI - Oversights of Einstein & Maxwell and Invalidity of E = mc28 August Vigier Conference 2018see paper: The Temperature Dependence of Gravitation for the Metallic Balls - Measured

Re: [Vo]:superluminal or not?

what is meant by lightspeed constancy by modern physics is vague, and in my 2018 talk I point out if what is meant is conventionalism then its Boscovich's theory (published 1758) 2017 talk on Boscovich: Dragoslav Stoiljkovic and Roger Anderton: "Boscovich's comprehensions of relative mov

Re: [Vo]:DARPA invests in propellant-free rocket theory

I videoed Mike's talk at: Mike McCulloch: How a unification of relativity & quantum mechanics gets rid of dark matter. | | | | | | | | | | | Mike McCulloch: How a unification of relativity & quantum mechanics gets... Mike McCulloch: How a unification of relativity & quantum

Re: [Vo]:Old news: Conversion of hydrogen into helium in palladium

water, except that the machinery of the tap isdispensed with in the case of the squirt’’ (Pearson 1900, p. 267). - I prefer term “point-particle” to“point-atom” On Sunday, 16 December 2018, 00:02:15 GMT, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: and in 18th century it is generally forgotten

Re: [Vo]:Old news: Conversion of hydrogen into helium in palladium

| | | | | | | | | | | Louis Kauffman Kauffman was valedictorian of his graduating class at Norwood Norfolk Central High School in 1962. He received h... | | | -that explains can unify quantum and relativity physics through knot theory On Sunday, 16 December 2018, 00:14:25 GMT, ROGER ANDERTON

Re: [Vo]:Old news: Conversion of hydrogen into helium in palladium

and in 18th century it is generally forgotten that unified field theory published >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic | | | | | | | | | | | >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljk... "From Boscovich's

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

There is stillsquabbling over LIGO at the moment   "An illusion": Grave doubts over LIGO's'discovery' of gravitational waves Michael Brooks New Scientist Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:00 UTC https://www.sott.net/article/399642-An-illusion-Grave-doubts-over-LIGOs-discovery-of-gravitational-waves    

Re: [Vo]:Richard Jowsey

unified field theory first published 1758 by Boscovich https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIUqdAYL_yk On Wednesday, 21 November 2018, 16:14:23 GMT, Nigel Dyer wrote: Bob I think that the thing to bear in mind is that Richard has started with relativity, and appears to be heading

Re: [Vo]:Planckian dissipation phenomenon

I think it can be done. It was Tesla that dealt with e-m waves faster than c. But then with the coming of Einstein all of that got ignored. Now there is mental blockage against believing it possible by those who believe in Einstein's relativity. On Monday, 13 May 2019, 00:24:12 BST, H LV

[Vo]:Einstein mistranslated

Einstein mistranslated from German into English, so all of modern physics is built on false beliefs based on bad translation of what Einstein was saying. Preview of Proposed talk 2019: EINSTEIN MISTRANSLATED. Most common sayings about Einstein's Relativity are based from a bad translation of

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity Paper 81-1608

>>This consideration is based on analyses accomplished by several Romanian >>physicists over the last couple decades.  A Theoretical Confirmation of the >>Gravitation New Origin Having a Dipolar Electrical Nature with Coulomb Law >>Corrected A Theoretical Confirmation of the

Re: [Vo]:Galilean relativity and a tree.

as earth rotates, top of tower is rotating at different speed to bottom of tower On Tuesday, 3 March 2020, 17:03:16 GMT, H LV wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:23 AM H LV wrote: > At the time of Galileo it was argued the Earth could not be spinning because > this motion would

Re: [Vo]:paradox of a charge in a gravitational field

My take on Einstein's relativity is that it has been mistranslated into English. Last year's talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKD9kXrjQ00 This year's talk will tie it into - Einstein's wife might have been a major contributor to relativity. So, Einstein didn't know enough about

[Vo]:New Physics from Information Loss

New Physics from Information Loss Dr. McCulloch The motivating problem: galaxy rotation Introduction to quantised inertia gets rid of dark matter/energy Funded by DARPA ANPA 19082020 | | | | | | | | | | | ANPA 19082020 | | |

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

t by E=mc2 would expect its mass to increase, but the opposite seems to happen. Paper abstract for this year's presentation at: http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/LoXII.pdf On Sunday, 31 May 2020, 16:27:35 BST, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: many of them now go to Vigier C

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

many of them now go to Vigier Conferences, this year's organization of conference messed up by covid19 Vigier 12 | | | | | | | | | | | Vigier 12 | | | I video many of the talks. I think main theory being promoted (at moment) is Rowland's theory, talk by Michael Houlden:

Re: [Vo]:Re: magnetism heat and dimensions--

point-particle theory is Boscovich's theory and educators don't teach it any more to physics students; only a few physicists know about it because now an obscure subject On Saturday, 27 June 2020, 23:18:35 BST, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: Particle physics has originally been based on

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

ing wrong with FTL communication. It is just that we don't know how to do it. Harry On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 8:32 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: i.e. the modern version of Ptolemaic epicycles On Sunday, 14 June 2020, 01:31:32 BST, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: >>I wonder what they mea

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

fails to be able to deal with gravity; but no maths for that is presented as to precisely when equations from such theories fail. On Monday, 8 June 2020, 20:03:09 BST, H LV wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: >>Thoughts?<< there are problems c

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

>>Thoughts?<< there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) with quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them then they are not on solid ground. >From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood so >false claims are

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

i.e. the modern version of Ptolemaic epicycles On Sunday, 14 June 2020, 01:31:32 BST, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: >>I wonder what they mean by "information" when they say in the introduction >>that the "information speed" never exceeds the speed lig

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

physicists to doubt the validity of special relativity. Harry On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:19 PM Che wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: >>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their respective domains<< When

Re: [Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

Exactly, so if say the sucide rate goes up because of depression brought on by lockdown, are they going to count that as death due to covid as well? -- Original Message -- From: "H LV" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, 21 Nov, 20 At 16:58 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Good news about the

Re: [Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

the group is threatened. Harry On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:13 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Exactly, so if say the sucide rate goes up because of depression brought on by lockdown, are they going to count that as death due to covid as well? --

[Vo]:All of modern physics wrong – built on misunderstanding of relativity

All of modern physics wrong – built on misunderstanding ofrelativity I gave my talk on Einstein’s relativity at two onlineconferences, it caused controversy. Einstein’s relativity has beenmisunderstood – Special relativity is not a relativity theory; Galileanrelativity is nothing to do with

Re: [Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last The lives that matter the least become apparent whenever the group is threatened. Harry On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:13 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Exactly, so if say the sucide rate goes up because of depression b

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

s to learn about the history of physics. Harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:55 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: That's anyone way of putting it. But memes like -> "emission theory makes wrong predictions in other domains" give the false i

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

e other domains. harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 1:51 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Good animation. emission theory DOES NOT makes wrong prediction in other domains. What probably really talking about is misapplying emission theory in other domains

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

Good animation. emission theory DOES NOT makes wrong prediction in other domains. What probably really talking about is misapplying emission theory in other domains the claim "emission theory makes wrong predictions in other domains" is just a meme promoting a falsehood It is an

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

d of emission from a source is always c with respect to the aether regardless of the motion of the source through the aether. However that would have consequences in terms of conservation of momentum which would need to be examined. Harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:55 PM ROGER ANDERTON mai

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

ing that spacetime curved to give GR was another update. Roger -- Original Message -- From: "H LV" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, 8 Dec, 20 At 15:47 Subject: Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:27 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@b

Re: [Vo]:Buster Keaton and the Michelson Morley experiment

Well one of the things that has confused me when taught relativity is- if have length contraction of an object in one direction and not perpendicular to that direction; then surely its getting denser along the contracted length and then increase gravitational force in the perpendicular

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

use they fear others will think less of them.<< People disagree about math -- Original Message -- From: "H LV" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, 8 Dec, 20 At 19:14 Subject: Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:31 PM ROGER ANDERTO

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

now published video on Youtube: "cannot measure one way lightspeed" deals with mistranslation of Einstein's paper, relativists moving goalposts etc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC9P644TXzY=youtu.be -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vort

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

t: Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory Ok I watched it. Are you arguing that if Einstein were alive today he would say that it is possible to measure the one way speed of light. Harry On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:35 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: now

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

ight. However, while the measured velocity of light could decrease or increase in the moving frame, I still think the rules should ensure that the velocity of light of wrt to the aether does not change. harry On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:21 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

fudging math is standard part of science/physics Einstein's work not even properly translated from German into English, and was probably done by his wife anyway; so all built on misunderstandings as per latest talk at ANPA-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWPi5WC_IV0=emb_logo How

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

a reversal from how it was in Einstein's day and for most of the 20th century. Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: fudging math is standard part of science/physics Einstein's work not even properly translate

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

e to explain the null result and all other apparent confirmations of relativity theory. Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: fudging math is standard part of science/physics Einstein's work not even properly translated

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

t forward motion. (These additive and subtractive rules ensure that the speed of light wrt to the aether frame is always C.) Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: The problem with "aether" is that there are lots of dif

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

The only thing it experiences is a continual change of location wrt to the aether frame. Harry On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:38 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: It's wave-particle duality; so have a particle model and wave model for photons and other quantum parti

[Vo]:Moving goalposts

Latest video: Moving goalposts: Einstein's 1905 clock mistake Historical documents are treated as cannot be modified, and so Einstein's papers keep getting reprinted without correction to their mistakes, and without notes on them saying they are in error.

RE: [Vo]:superluminal mind

Slobodan Nedic<< also deals with Boscovich theory. People like Tesla and Boscovich get missed out of Western Science education Boscovich 18 th century and used to be part of physics education before WWII then gets missed out. Boscovich statute-> Ruggiero Boscovich - Jesuits Ireland

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

o make a prediction about stellar aberration it has to use a definite one way speed of light because stellar aberration only involves light moving one way. This seems to be inconsistent. Harry On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:45 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:

Re: [Vo]:superluminal mind

tances. Harry On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:39 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: development of Boscovich theory led to quantum physics, Dragoslav from Serbia talk on Boscovich-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU>

Re: [Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

COVID-19 will probably kill ~350,000 people in one year. (It has killed 250,000 in 10 months.) << where do you get those numbers from? according to -> https://masterinvestor.co.uk/economics/journal-of-the-plague-year-xi-when-the-cure-killed-more-than-the-pestilence/ Moreover, the

Re: [Vo]:planetary formation

1) If both the Sun and the planets formed from the same gas/dust cloud, how come the Sun is mostly Hydrogen and the Earth is a rocky planet?<< one theory/hypothesis/speculation is that there were supermassive stars (that have lived out their lives and died) in early universe where the

[Vo]:Special relativity: the pedagogical trick

Special relativity: the pedagogical trick Special relativity has been misunderstood by the mainstream physics community, and physics students have been taught wrong!Physicist Don Lincoln effectively is telling us that the Great Richard Feynman didn't understand relativity. But what Richard

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

Probably Social Darwnists -> where think they can do whatever they like to inferior species -- Original Message -- From: "Terry Blanton" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, 20 May, 21 At 23:53 Subject: Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month On Thu, May

RE: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

Well, aliens supposedly refer to people as containers for souls Robert Lazar mentioned a book that contained the history of earth and that it said that humans were referred to as ..containers for souls" and that souls could be traded in something like a barter system. The aliens are doing

[Vo]:vacuum drop tower

Hi Does anyone here have access to a vacuum drop tower; I want to do an antigravity experiment

  1   2   >