Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Analytics] question about Pageviews dumps

gt; the time calculations. > > Cheers, > > Marc > > > El dc., 29 juny, 2016 03:11, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> va > escriure: > >> If historic data is okay, there's already a dataset released ( >> https://figshare.com/articles/Activity_Sessions_datasets

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Analytics] question about Pageviews dumps

If historic data is okay, there's already a dataset released ( https://figshare.com/articles/Activity_Sessions_datasets/1291033) that was designed specifically to answer questions around how to best calculate session length with regards to Wikipedia (http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2878) On Tue, Jun

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Training for administrators

gt; project lead, so whoever does become the project lead on the Wikimedia side > will likely need to do further work on outreach and screening to select the > final expert(s). > > Pine > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> &

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Training for administrators

Well, my feedback would be that for this to be useful I would expect researchers *from* that subject-matter background to be involved. I don't see this (nor a concrete plan for their involvement). On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Pine W wrote: > Hi folks, > > Related to

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Wikitech-l] Wired article about machine learning

+100. Last I checked the Dartmouth Conference's premise still hadn't been satisfied, so calling anything ML can do AI is just clickbait froth. But I'm agreed that the non-AI "AI" stuff is both the power and the danger here, and this kind of overselling is...risky. As an example - this weekend Pro

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wikipedia and SMEs; another article about the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

It did, yes, but that wasn't it's primary focus - AFT is an example of expert engagement in the same way it's an example of PHP: sure it uses it but that's not necessarily what comes to mind when you think of it. (I appreciate I've left myself open to quite a lot of comments about precisely what

Re: [Wiki-research-l] design patterns for peer learning and peer production, with wikimedia case study - preprint

On 28 December 2015 at 10:03, Joe Corneli <holtzerman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28 2015, Oliver Keyes wrote: > >> My big question is how these pedagogic maps factor in the negatives of >> peer production communities - harassment, toxicity - and route around >

Re: [Wiki-research-l] design patterns for peer learning and peer production, with wikimedia case study - preprint

> ___ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] What Wikimedia Research is up to in the next quarter

Awesome; thanks! On 21 December 2015 at 12:12, Leila Zia <le...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> So what's happening with the link recommendation system? Is tha

Re: [Wiki-research-l] What Wikimedia Research is up to in the next quarter

t; >> ___ >> Wiki-research-l mailing list >> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >> > > ___ > Wiki-research-l mailing

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Community policing, New Page Patrol, Articles for Creation, and editor retention

______ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Community policing, New Page Patrol, Articles for Creation, and editor retention

rocess than like an HR process. Maybe we need more of > an HR approach? > > Pine > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> We can probably talk about the nature of new page patrol without >> resorting t

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Community policing, New Page Patrol, Articles for Creation, and editor retention

ting here are, for better and for worse, > outside the scope of what I would consider harassment. I think that they > could be described as toxic interactions in general, and/or a shortage of or > long-delayed positive interactions at places like NPP and AFC. > > Pine > > >

[Wiki-research-l] R client for the new Pageviews API

language of choice, and it'll be up on CRAN shortly. Thanks, -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Analytics] R client for the new Pageviews API

> When can I find more documentation about it? > > Cheers, > > G > > > Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia ∙ Assistant Research Scientist, Indiana University > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> Shall do! I

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Analytics] R client for the new Pageviews API

Shall do! I'm already linking in the internal documentation :) On 17 November 2015 at 21:11, Madhumitha Viswanathan <mviswanat...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Woot! Nice :) Would be cool to link to the API docs from your README too. > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Ol

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Verifying claims about ENWP project size

t; >>> ___ >>> Wiki-research-l mailing list >>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >>> >> >> >> >>

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Has the recent increase in English wikipedia's core community gone beyond a statistical blip?

://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation

Re: [Wiki-research-l] How to read blobs in text table?

list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https

[Wiki-research-l] Trying to find a paper..

If anyone has a copy of Rehurek Kolkus's Language Identification on the Web: Extending the Dictionary Method from 2009, could they send it to me? Thanks! -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Trying to find a paper..

Woah, now resolved! This community is awesome :D On 28 July 2015 at 15:01, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: If anyone has a copy of Rehurek Kolkus's Language Identification on the Web: Extending the Dictionary Method from 2009, could they send it to me? Thanks! -- Oliver Keyes

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Aidez à améliorer l'exhaustivité de Wikipédia en français

list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https

[Wiki-research-l] Anti-harassment policies within the R community

in as a suggested edit, in the format existing signers are using; 2. Email me so I can confirm that the person signing as Foo Bar is genuinely Foo Bar; 3. Done! Many thanks, -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Community health (retitled thread)

-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Community health (retitled thread)

Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Two articles of interest regarding Wikipedia research

___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 117, Issue 14

to Special:Random. Perhaps pageviews started to be counted for the page that it got redirected to, rather than the Special:Random page itself. But then why wouldn't it go to 0? What are those ~1,000 hits a day? [image: ] ~~ it is a mystery ~~ [image: ] On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Oliver Keyes

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 117, Issue 14

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Wiki-research-l digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: How to explain drop in random searches (Oliver Keyes) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

. Cheers, Scott P.S. It looks like the Universal Language Selector already uses the accept-language header for its preference screen. On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: As I've now said...4 times, I don't think we'd be using geolocation. We'd be using

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

#language-territory Nemo ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

bullets in this area, the solution would be obvious and we wouldn't even be thinking about having this conversation. cheers stuart On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: As I've now said...4 times, I don't think we'd be using geolocation. We'd be using the accept

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Cross-posting to research and analytics, too! -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org Date: 6 May 2015 at 13:11 Subject: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers To: wikimedia-sea

[Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

Cross-posting to research and analytics, too! -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org Date: 6 May 2015 at 13:11 Subject: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers To: wikimedia-sea...@lists.wikimedia.org Hey all, (Throwing this to the public list

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

at 6:40 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Cross-posting to research and analytics, too! -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org Date: 6 May 2015 at 13:11 Subject: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers To: wikimedia-sea

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

-l ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

, these may or may not kick off in a big way. cheers stuart -- ...let us be heard from red core to black sky On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Agreed! That's one of the changes I'd really like to push ahead with, although we're going to do some more

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: Traffic to the portal from Zero providers

Katz smk...@gmail.com wrote: hey guys, you can't guess geolocation, because occasionally you'd be wrong. this happens to me all the time. I want to read a site in spanish... and then it thinks I'm in Latin America, when I'm not. --Sam On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Oliver Keyes oke

[Wiki-research-l] [Announce] a new release of Pageviews data

/English_Wikipedia_pageviews_by_second/1394684) -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 116, Issue 16

On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.orgmailto:oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey all, Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research on Wikidata's content coverage

of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf Gruß, Fabian On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey all, Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research on Wikidata's content coverage

Perfect; thank you! On 8 April 2015 at 09:53, Finn Årup Nielsen f...@imm.dtu.dk wrote: Dear Oliver, On 04/08/2015 03:38 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote: Thanks both! I'm specifically looking at Wikidata's coverage, rather than Wikipedia's - in other words, work done on deficiencies in the mapping

[Wiki-research-l] Research on Wikidata's content coverage

Hey all, Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything. -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation

Re: [Wiki-research-l] rc stream

___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research

Re: [Wiki-research-l] rc stream

PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Well, if you got all your learning out of the way in the first email, I'm really confused as to what you thought a backhanded none of you are helping would do 3 hours later. You asked an honest question, you got a very reasonable and perfectly

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wikipedia search logs needed

://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/attachments/20150403/e51fd17c/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 6 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 02:47:54 -0400 From: Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Anyone have access to this article?

-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Technical][Request for Comment] A new format for the pageview dumps

½å��æ©Ã¯Â¿Â½æ§Ã¯Â¿Â½ 1 Cheers, G Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia ✎ 919 E 10th ∙ Bloomington 47408 IN ∙ USA ☞ http://www.glciampaglia.com/ ✆ +1 812 855-7261 ✉ gciam...@indiana.edu 2015-03-13 12:06 GMT-07:00 Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org: So, we've got a new pageviews

Re: [Wiki-research-l] (no subject)

/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

[Wiki-research-l] [Technical][Request for Comment] A new format for the pageview dumps

, this is a spare-time project; I've also got volunteers for Code Review and checking, too (Yuvi and Otto). The replacement of the old files! Too many people depend on that format and that definition, and I don't want to make them sad. Thoughts? -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Release]

-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Release]

come after us, The fertile earth, in which truth may grow in bright places, tended by many hands, And the broad fall of sunshine, warming our first steps toward knowing how much we do not know. —Catherine Munro On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Release]

requests from US-based bots/automata we’re still failing to detect. On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org javascript:; wrote: Update: the original Shiny instance went down due to server load soon after release. It's now up again at http://datavis.wmflabs.org/where

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Release]

://sarahlaplante.com/), and soon it will hopefully be /non-hideous/ mapping (the current mass of blue and grey is because my aesthetic tastes are...I don't actually have any aesthetic tastes) On 2 March 2015 at 22:36, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Indeed! Orienting it that way (pivoting on language

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Release]

Wikipedia comes from Denmark. best regards Finn On 02/25/2015 10:06 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote: Hey all! We've released a highly-aggregated dataset of readership data - specifically, data about where, geographically, traffic to each of our projects (and all of our projects) comes from

[Wiki-research-l] [Release]

an exploration tool for it at https://ironholds.shinyapps.io/WhereInTheWorldIsWikipedia/ Hope it's useful to people! -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Release]

, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey all! We've released a highly-aggregated dataset of readership data - specifically, data about where, geographically, traffic to each of our projects (and all of our projects) comes from. The data can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Analytics] [Release]

(and all of our projects) comes from. The data can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1317408 - additionally, I've put together an exploration tool for it at https://ironholds.shinyapps.io/WhereInTheWorldIsWikipedia/ Hope it's useful to people! -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Analytics] [Release]

Any thoughts? Erik -Original Message- From: analytics-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:analytics-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Keyes Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 22:37 To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Scholarly citations by DOI in Wikipedia

Sweet! Can I ask that we make the 2% explicitly available to wiki gnomes? :) On Monday, 9 February 2015, Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey folks, Dario and I just updated the scholarly citations dataset to include Digital Object Identifiers. We found 742k citations (524k

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Altmetric.com now tracks Wikipedia citations

://www.anadrome.org Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com writes: And SEO spammers will add themselves, too! This is not a new problem. On Thursday, 5 February 2015, Kerry Raymond kerry.raym...@gmail.com wrote: Do I understand this correctly? That Wikipedia articles that cite academic publications

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Altmetric.com now tracks Wikipedia citations

It also requires SEO people to demonstrate a modicum of logical reasoning skills. Sadly, from my work on understanding our traffic trends, this appears to be beyond at least some of them. On Friday, 6 February 2015, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote: That's actually a Wikipedia thing, by

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Altmetric.com now tracks Wikipedia citations

And SEO spammers will add themselves, too! This is not a new problem. On Thursday, 5 February 2015, Kerry Raymond kerry.raym...@gmail.com wrote: Do I understand this correctly? That Wikipedia articles that cite academic publications will be included in citation count now (at least for

Re: [Wiki-research-l] R library for URL handling

Also, version 1.2.0 of the R MW API client library - https://github.com/Ironholds/WikipediR (what can I say, being semi-bedridden makes me a productive little gnome) On 21 January 2015 at 18:47, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Possibly of interest to any researchers who work with our

[Wiki-research-l] R library for URL handling

] [0] https://github.com/Ironholds/urltools [1] https://github.com/Ironholds/urltools/blob/master/vignettes/urltools.Rmd -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Geo-aggregation of Wikipedia page views: Maximizing geographic granularity while preserving privacy – a proposal

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 AM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote: I'm confused; john, could you point to the element of the collected data that isn't collected already by default in any Nginx or Apache setup

Re: [Wiki-research-l] How many links did TWL account recipients add to Wikipedia with their access?

Actually, the API structure has a grab all of the external links from [page] query: I'm not sure if it can be applied to historical revisions, but we can see! On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote: Hoi, These same people may have added content to

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Geo-aggregation of Wikipedia page views: Maximizing geographic granularity while preserving privacy – a proposal

I'm confused; john, could you point to the element of the collected data that isn't collected already by default in any Nginx or Apache setup? I agree that there might be a lack of user expectation, but 'silently capturing behavioral data' seems somewhat hyperbolic to describe what's actually

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Endowment perpetuity

/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

Bah; dropped a digit when reading the y-axis. My bad. My concerns about straight extrapolation for this model remain, however. On 2 January 2015 at 11:31, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: 3 billion being...above the upper bound of the extrapolation you've made? Uh-huh. Extrapolation

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

On 2 January 2015 at 15:08, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: Oliver Keyes wrote: ... Extrapolation is not a particularly useful method to use for the budget, because it assumes endless exponential growth. I agree. Formal budgeting usually shouldn't extend further than three

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: $55 million raised in 2014

. Repeatedly having this same conversation is a colossal, ever-draining waste of everyone's time. Please stop bringing it up. -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Looking for reader's click log data for Wikipedia

/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Looking for reader's click log data for Wikipedia

exactly we need is the navigation path of Wikipedia readers. with regards Ditty On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Afraid not. First, we do not have some of those datapoints; we do not currently have unique user IDs. And, second, it would

[Wiki-research-l] Editor sessions and related metrics

, -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Editor sessions and related metrics

Totally; already threw it at the internal research list :) On 16 December 2014 at 14:37, Toby Negrin tneg...@wikimedia.org wrote: Awesome work! Can we distribute in the foundation? On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey all, Not sure if this would

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Pageviews, mobile versus desktop

Yep; same timeframe. On 15 December 2014 at 12:50, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote: Oliver Keyes, 13/12/2014 21:15: http://ironholds.org/misc/pageviews_year_and_week.png - fascinating! It reveals a lot of seasonality in the desktop views - again, not replicated on mobile

Re: [Wiki-research-l] commentary on Wikipedia's community behaviour (Aaron gets a quote)

Communities are who they choose to offer plaudits to. The people getting off largely scott-free in this case are people a highly vocal subgroup has put on a pedestal for years. I don't know if the community as a whole is that ugly and bitter, but I can understand where people would get the

Re: [Wiki-research-l] How to track all the diffs in real time?

-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

[Wiki-research-l] Pageviews, mobile versus desktop

nothing!) but the patterns. Mobile clusters far more tightly than desktop does. I'm not sure what this means (desktop users are weird? There's a lot of bot traffic we're not catching? That's my guess) but I thought it was pretty and might provoke some hypothesising. So, here you go! -- Oliver

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Pageviews, mobile versus desktop

13, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: I'm not sure what this means (desktop users are weird? There's a lot of bot traffic we're not catching? That's my guess) but I thought it was pretty and might provoke some hypothesising. So, here you go! I think the axis labels

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Pageviews, mobile versus desktop

Summers e...@pobox.com wrote: It might be interesting to bucket by week to see if you still see the difference in clustering between desktop and mobile. I wonder if it’s a result of different behavior on desktop/mobile on weekdays/weekends? //Ed On Dec 13, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Oliver Keyes oke

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Pageviews, mobile versus desktop

http://ironholds.org/misc/pageviews_year_and_week.png - fascinating! It reveals a lot of seasonality in the desktop views - again, not replicated on mobile (at least, not so strongly) On 13 December 2014 at 13:49, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Ooh, that's a really good point. In fact

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Wikimedia-l] wikipedia access traces ?

-research-l ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki

Re: [Wiki-research-l] What works for increasing editor engagement?

systems: https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Develop_systems_for_accuracy_review ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Joining derp?

Uhm. If you don't think there's any distinction in nature or terminology between 'The contents of a form field intentionally filled out and submitted by a user' andevery other kind of data, there's a disconnect here somewhere. On Thursday, 4 September 2014, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:

Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Wikimedia-l] Catching copy and pasting early

I'm pretty sure that responding to well-intended and politely phrased criticism with sarcasm is probably also not something that will help us in avoiding losing contributors :p I agree that this is not an immediately understandable thing about contributions, although I think it should be more

[Wiki-research-l] this month's research newsletter

Both of these suggestions sound great to me! I'm not sure who the best person is to move them forward (I encourage anyone who wants to volunteer to speak up!) but whatever happens, I'm really grateful that we could turn this into a 'how do we fix this in the long-term?' conversation and not get

Re: [Wiki-research-l] this month's research newsletter

@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Is 'Random article' statistically robust over what population?

___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Social Media and Learning - survey - Please help!

___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Kill the bots

at a 1:1000 rate. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NicoV/Wikipedia_Cleaner/Documentation On 20 May 2014 07:50, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Actually, belay that, I have a pretty good idea. I'll fire the log parser up now. On 20 May 2014 01:21, Oliver Keyes oke

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Kill the bots

___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Kill the bots

___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wikipedia traffic: selected language versions

-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

[Wiki-research-l] Fwd: [Wmfall] Next research data showcase: tomorrow at 11.30

://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wmfall -- Oliver Keyes Product Analyst Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wikinews original reporting value as a measure of news events

Questions: What are those 22 variables? How many datapoints did you get, distributed between how many categories? How are you measuring correlation? Are we talking Pearson's? On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wikinews original reporting value as a measure of news events

The only list I see there has 18. On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_values The 22 items in the lst there. Sincerely, Laura Hale On Sunday, September 8, 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote: Questions: What are those 22

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Why are users blocked on Wikipedia?

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote: On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote: ENWP Pine, 04/05/2013 08:36: Ironholds, would you be interested in investigating how stewards, global sysops, and global rollbackers