You could also try just pinging the broadcast address for the network. Most
network device will respond and show there IP address. Failing that "Super
Scan" is a great tool and is handy to see what ports you have open and
therefore help asses any security risks.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
I notice this kit is 11b only. Is there a specific reason for using 11b for
hotspots instead of 11g? I'm guessing it's because of the greater output
power and receive sensitivity of 11b but isn't OFDM better for bouncing
around the walls of a Hotel?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Is this all just omni's (i.e signal is bouncing of the structure straight
back at the omni causing noise) and what's the preferred for 5.8GHz? Don't
use omni's myself but it always handy to know just in case ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Has anyone used radio to radio with
attenuators to check pigtails?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenco Wireless
Sent: 03 March 2006 06:01
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pigtails.
and 5.8GHz low power
It's called the
VoIP is an essential part of your offerings. We target business customers
and try to sell SDSL style services instead of ADSL style as it's just as
easy for us to deliver a symmetrical service then it is to deliver an
asymmetric service. The key to selling the symmetric service is by showing
the cu
Our Asterisk server is a P4 2.8GHz (800fsb) running Freebsd and runs fine
but looking to the future I'm wondering how many concurrent VoIP calls this
would be able to handle. Has anyone seen any CPU related issues with
Asterisk in real world environments yet?
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message
Ola,
Has anyone tried running Mikrotik on a Via CoreFussion based SBC
yet? I know people have had issues with Via boards in the past but I was
hoping all the bugs are ironed out now. There is one board that I'm thinking
of trying which has the Luke 533MHz, 256M onboard memory, CF slot, dua
Is the switch likely to be the bottle neck in your network? Surely you want
QoS enabled routers where bandwidth isn't plentiful.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: 29 March 2006 03:50
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sw
t;From: Rick Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 04:09 AM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation
>
>I can't see how having a QOS switch could hurt...with VOIP, QOS in as
>many places
>as possible can onl
Hi Richard,
This cloaking mechanism is the 5MHz and 10MHz channel sizes that
George was referring to on the Star WAR boards. Works really well and even
seems to improve signal quality.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
All the details are on the Valemount web site
http://www.staros.com/starvx/
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Goodin
Sent: 11 April 2006 09:15
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
So..
I have recently been playing with the Hotspot side of Mikrotik which seems
to work well. I had a look through the manual which suggests you should be
able to re-direct people every now and again to advertisements but it
doesn't actually explain how this is done. It looks to be done through the
tran
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Mikrotik "Advertisement" Feature
- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject: [WISPA] The Mikrotik "Advertisement
otspot side so we can see what this feature looks like in action? I
would really like to see the ad feature running and I am having trouble
visualizing exactly what it is doing.
Many thanks,
Scriv
Paul Hendry wrote:
>Aha, now I see it. Never use Winbox so missed the option but now see it on
&g
rotik "Advertisement" Feature
If the ad is blocked by a pop-up blocker the user sees an empty page with a
link to the ad and has to click on the link before he can continue on to the
the requested page.
- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: 19 April 2006 05:18
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] The Mikrotik "Advertisement" Feature
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Paul Hendry wrote:
>I'll see what I can do but it's only in the lab at present. I'm not
>sure a pu
You could always go for one of the newer
Nokia cell phones that apart from being a normal cell phone, also support
802.11b/g and VoIP. They also run symbian so you could stick putty on it and remotely
support your network.
Cheers,
P.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
Supports EGSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900, WCDMA
(3GPP Rel4), EGPRS, GPRS and 802.11g/e/i. What option do you have in SW
Wisconsin?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Sent: 01 May 2006 12:10
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] wirele
Interesting. How much do these go for?
Paul Hendry
Skyline Networks
http://www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: 09 May 2006 19:45
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Spectrum Analyzer
8GHz? Is it the norm to get
some form of converter?
Paul Hendry
Skyline Networks
http://www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: 10 May 2006 00:32
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Spectrum An
Have you considered the EMP-8602 instead? Cheaper, newer chipset and
supports a, b and g (100mW, 400mW and 400mW). Not used them myself but have
heard good things from people who have.
Paul Hendry
Skyline Networks
http://www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ola,
Just received a RIC/522 from Mikrotik for testing. Is a bit on the
large size but seems pretty well built/designed. Ideally I would like a
lower powered CPE so that the physical size is much smaller but for business
installs I think these should be fine.
The Rootenna's are ok
Ola,
We are
looking for VoIP providers who offer PSTN termination in various countries so
we can make the best use of LCR. The only problem I have come across so far is
that not all providers will pass the CLI that we generate. Does anyone have a
list of VoIP providers who do PSTN termi
Ola,
I currently have a scenario
where a dozen clients are connected to a 5.8GHz AP where one is a NLOS link.
The link quality is fine for this client during normal conditions but when it
rains it becomes a little unstable which the customer is fine with as they have
no alte
St, Midland, MI 48640
- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
Ola,
I currently have a scenario where a dozen clien
on the client
> side. If the client is running Mikrotik, you will find the information in
> the same place looking at the same TX statistics. Not all equipment
> provides this information.
>
> Dave
>
> 989-837-3790 x 151
> 989-837-3780 fax
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w
Ola,
I’m
looking at deploying a small WDS mesh using only Mikrotik in the mini-box
enclosures. I want it to be 5.8GHz only to avoid future interference but I can
only find cheap outdoor omni’s with N-Type at 2.4GHz. I have run a couple
of 5.8GHz antennae temporarily at 2.4GH
r but going ahead and driving
anyway because "the car still goes". In short, you are going to be
penalizing yourself significantly. Why not be good to yourself and get
some 5.8 GHz antennas?
jack
Paul Hendry wrote:
> Ola,
>
>
>
> I’
awhile now.
Fairly inexpensive I believe.
George
Paul Hendry wrote:
> Ola,
>
>
>
> I’m looking at deploying a small WDS mesh using only
> Mikrotik in the mini-box enclosures. I want it to be 5.8GHz only to
> avoid future interference but I can only find cheap outdoor
VLAN's aren't implemented using (R)STP. (R)STP is just used to prevent
layer2 loops where as VLAN's are used to separate traffic at layer 2 into
separate broadcast domains.
VLAN's are layer 2 so you need a flat network to implement them which means
there are scalability issues. Because they are la
We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
the core network but the unknown quantity seems to be if there are any
latency or speed issues related to the move. A "true" switched network is
faster than a routed network as the switching is done at a hardware level
but in
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 13 June 2006 13:26
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Paul Hendry wrote:
>We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
>t
u really need to
load the network, as that is when the jitter and sparatic latency happens.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List
Are these figures in the lab? I have seen similar with a Mikrotik/N-Streme
solution.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: 16 June 2006 19:57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbp
I am and always have been a StarOS fan. They came out on top when we where
initially tested various products 2 years ago and have been great since
however we had to revisited RouterOS recently when we noticed that the
majority of our traffic was 100 - 200 byte packets which was killing our WAR
base
In my experience ATA adapters have always given better quality voice than a
software solution.
P.
www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: 21 June 2006 21:28
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ATA
Would be interesting to see how long a cable run you could run these over.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: 20 July 2006 16:14
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] SercoNet
Mixed Signals
Wireless networks get a boost from
Ola,
Anyone know anywhere that has stock of the RIC/522's from Mikrotik? Lead
times direct are 3 - 4 weeks at the mo but we need 20 ASAP to be shipped to
Cyprus.
Cheers,
P.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/40
Mikrotik is builtin. CF is for optional stuff like web caching. Boot it up
and plug a console cable in to access.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: 02 August 2006 23:31
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] RouterBoard 532
There are no new WRAP models on the market
and due to AMD discontinuing the SC1100 CPU, the current WRAP models have a
limited life. I have it on good authority that there may well be a replacement (with
a much faster CPU) this side of Christmas ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailt
Title: Message
Hey JohnnyO,
Being a big StarOS and Mikrotik user I
have always been curious as to how these compare with the likes of Orthogon. I
always saw the Gemini more as a product to use in NLOS environments. Have you
ever compared Mikrotik on an RB532 with Orthogon in NLOS?
C
Hi Lonnie,
Would be great to see your test results using smaller packet sizes of
100bytes which seems to be around the average packet size for the majority
of the traffic on my network. This test always seems to have a massive
impact on the available throughput and is currently the reason why we u
Hi Gino,
Thanks for the results. As expected, small
packets seriously damages the available throughput. Do you know if it also
hammers the throughput on your other backhaul links where you use the Spectra
or Atlas? I know a few people have asked Lonnie to incorporate some form of
packet
Nokia E70. Is a mobile + VoIP + wifi + runs
Symbian which has a couple of stumbler type programs. I have one and it means
with a PuTTy for Symbian I can look after my network no matter where I am ;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
So with this MTU increase is there any chance of packet aggregation so we
can make use of it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler
Sent: 17 August 2006 07:24
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routerboard 532 and NStrem
Hi all,
Looking at playing with Freeside for various billing reasons but, as
some of you have pointed out, it's not the best product for when it
comes to support. Have anyone found any good forums or documents that
have helped you in the past?
Many thanks,
Paul.
--
ispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
Paul Hendry
Technical Director
Skyline Networks & Consultancy Ltd
Unit 6C - Woodside Commercial Estate,
Woodside,
Thornwood,
Epping,
Essex
CM16 6LJ
Tel: 0845 004 0404
Mob: 0783 492 1803
Email: paul.hen...@skyline-networks.com
Web: http://www.
t set on the wire interface.
On 9/5/2012 9:13 AM, Paul Hendry wrote:
Depends on your topology. If you are planning to use
username/passwords with PPP then bandwidth limits can be done on the
PPP concentrator. If they are just going to be routed then you will
need to mark all traffic then use
and
dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
Paul Hendry
Technical Director
Skyline Networks &
ve a
different backend DB.
On 22/11/2012 17:07, Josh Luthman wrote:
I'm using ROS. It is a known bug.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 22, 2012 12:01 PM, "Paul Hendry"
<mailto:paul.hen...@skyline-networks
First stage would be to check the basics. Can both ends of the VPLS tunnel ping
each other? Are all interfaces between end points exchanging LDP? Assuming this
is all good I suspect an MTU issue so have you got any RB450G, RB493G, older
routerboards, etc. in the path?
- Reply message -
Hi Scott,
If you perform a ping between your pe routers (mikrotik devices prior to
hand-off to customer), what is the maximum size packet you can send
successfully, with df bit set?
P.
- Reply message -
From: "Scott Carullo"
To: "Paul Hendry" , "Scott Car
-C's?
Many thanks,
--
Paul Hendry
Technical Director
Skyline Networks & Consultancy Ltd
Web: http://www.skyline-networks.com
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed
Hi Scott,
What in particular are you looking to achieve?
Many thanks,
Paul.
- Reply message -
From: "Scott Carullo"
To: ,
Cc: "Carullo, Scott"
Subject: [WISPA] MPLS / Mikrotik Assistance Needed
Date: Mon, Nov 11, 2013 15:45
Good morning.
We are in need of anyone who has deployed MPL
We also had issues with the routing package on v5.26. Mikrotik didn't want to
know as we weren't running the "latest" release. Pointed out v5.26 was the
latest to which they said "no, v6.7 is". V5 is unsupported even though it's
still available on the website for download so bottom line, unless
If you get a dry pair from your office to a customer site via the local
exchange is there any reason you couldn't use ADSL2+ or VDSL equipment on a
dry pair?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: 17 August 2
We have a few 2” Radiowaves dishes.
They work great but are a little expensive. Tessco.com have them ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Reed
Sent: 14 September 2005 19:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3' and larger
5.8Ghz dishes
Hi Matt,
We are using Asterisk too and it does seem to be very feature rich.
When you where testing did you notice a difference between the voice quality
of GSM and G729? Also, is your Asterisk server peering with your provider
using IAX2 and G711?
To optimize your StarOS AP I gues
Or with StarOS you need to run a VDS tunnel over your wireless link then
bridge the Ethernet to the VDS interface.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 29 September 2005 03:31
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik
Ola,
In the process of re-designing
the corporate website and was wondering if anyone had any wifi related photo’s
(towers, building with kit on, people using laptops in the middle of a field,
engineer on a tower, etc.) they had taken that they would mind us using.
Many
Don't suppose you have made that T.38 implementation open source have you?
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 03 October 2005 18:46
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Faxes
Good luck finding real-time fax support
I would imagine that it's the WRAP's CPU which should be visable at the
bottom of the screen. If you disable all connection tracking (option 8 under
the advanced tab) you should get around 20mbps on the speed tests.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Tom,
You say that "connection tracking" is on. I advised you to turn this
of (i.e untick all the boxes in the connection tracking sub menu). To give
an example, we have a 28km link with WRAP's/CM9's/5.8GHz at each end. Signal
sits at around -71 (qual 24) and we hard set the rate on both en
Indeed. And finding a clear 5 or 10Mhz is a lot easier than finding a clear
20Mhz.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: 11 October 2005 15:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul Hendry
What IP address do you have when connected at the office and is there a
reverse path through the local network back to that address? If so, are you
natting that address at you router / internet gateway?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron W
t sure how this compares with any testing others have done on other
systems but thought I should post the results.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 11 October 2005 16:09
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [
Ola,
Does anyone have a recommendation on a good
microwave solution to provide about 100mbps full-duplex over 30km? If so, does
anyone have some 2nd hand kit for sale ;)
Cheers,
P.
This email and any files
transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use
sing rules (and spectrum
policy in general) vary by country
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Tues
] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 13 October 2005 21:08
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Just a little update. We thought we'd see what we could get through a couple
of these 2 port WAR boards in ideal conditions (rssi -25) with turbo
enabl
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul Hendry wrote:
> Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes.
Hey, as long as you're doublin
o the real
throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around
37-39mbps in both rx and tx.
Many thanks,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32
To: 'WISPA General List'
Also just noticed that the TCP test results as well as not taking into
account the TCP acknowledgements it also doesn't include the TCP header and
IP header.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 20 October 2005 13:
:29
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul,
Was this turbo mode or standard?
Thanks
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
> Of Paul Hendry
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 200
?? I knew Atheros had a 1900MHz chipset but didn't think they had a 900MHz
product. Do you know where the details are for this chipset?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 22 October 2005 22:25
To: WISPA General List
Subject: R
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower
@ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz. Both
I have seen a similar thing. If you do a speed test using RouterOS built-in
test try changing the packet size to 200-300. As far as I can tell, this is
a truer representation of normal internet traffic and does drop the
throughput considerably.
M3P is a good way around this as it will aggregate al
something else?
Lonnie
On 10/28/05, Paul Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
>
>
>Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
> antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
> 5.8GHz 120" vert s
00:09
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5GHz interference
Paul Hendry wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
>
>
> Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
> antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
> 5.8GHz
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower
@ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz. Both
For StarOS we use MRTG and Starutil. You should be able to graph anything
that Starutil can provide.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: 03 November 2005 17:33
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise
StarOS isn't great for SNMP but Starutil works really well for various
stuff. We have been using it to graph with MRTG the signal levels for
individual clients and backhaul links as well as throughput.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beh
Hmm, interesting. Is it only for the WRAP
platform? L7 will kill that throughput on a WRAP. I guess all it needs is a
modified version of Madwifi and we have another StarOS/Mikrotik/IkarusOS
platform ;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Ola,
Looking to deploy 2 Mikrotik
routers to connect 2 offices using EoIP and would also like to use the routers
as VoIP to PSTN gateways. Does anyone have advice on what are the best cards to
use with Mikrotik for FXS (to connect telephones and faxes) and FXO (to connect
Hey Gino,
Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort
of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking
to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km
with a max EIRP of 33db (as that’s what we are stuck with in the UK L) or 28km with good
LOS/Fresnel clearance with max EIRP of 33db?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Sent: 13 November 2005 21
L PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Hey Gino,
Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort
of obstructions are there and what kind of thro
Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated
throughput on the Orthogon units over 2k through very lite trees? The
problem I have is that I haven't been able to complete a site survey but
have been told that they had a link during last winter which dropped once
leaves
Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than
1500 bytes I have been playing with Mikrotik's M3P to aggregate the smaller
packets together. Throughput wise this seems to work very well and we see a
big improvement on the amount of data we can pass over our wireless
backha
In my experience, the guys at MikroTik are quite responsive to user
requests.
Have you asked them about this?
--
Blair Davis
West Michigan Wireless, ISP
269-686-8648
Paul Hendry wrote:
>Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than
>1500 bytes I have been p
iginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:08 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated
throughp
sh
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL P
Wow, you all replace a lot of kit. What are the main reasons for the CPE's
dying? Isn't there something you can do to improve the install of the units
to help prevent these failures?
We have only been offering services for a year but so far haven't had to
replace a single CPE. We build the CPE's i
I use to do this but kept falling of the ladder as the same string was
attached to both my finger and toe ;)
Grab a spare PC and build a standard FreeBSD box then stick SugarCRM on it
(it's not that hard to do as I've managed it ;). Once it's set-up you can
admin it from Windows via the HTML login
Hi Dan,
Was the outlook plugin the only reason you went for Tiger over
Sugar? When we set ours up I compared the 2 and Suger looked more
customizable and also looked like it might integrate with Asterisk sooner
than Tiger.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
Ola everyone,
Does anyone use any of the 5.8GHz multi polarized antennas from WiFi
Plus (http://www.wifi-plus.com/pages/2/index.htm)? I saw these a while ago
but never really paid much attention however I'm now wondering how these
would compare with the Orthogon offerings when combined wit
is to valuable to waste).
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MP Technol
Because of the amount of errors and one
way transmission I would guess there is a duplex mismatch. Try hard setting
both ends of the link to 10mb half duplex to begin with. If this works try hard
setting both ends to 100mb full-duplex.
Cheers,
P.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's wrong with his foot wear? I have a pair my self ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: 26 November 2005 18:08
To: WISPA General List; Jim Patient; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Jim Patient - hehehe
I just ran
So does anyone use any packet aggregation software to help keep a good
throughput across there wireless network?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 14 November 2005 23:06
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WIS
900MHz, 2.4GHz or 5GHz?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Wallace
Sent: 04 December 2005 22:55
To: WISP; Wispa; WISPA; Wispers
Subject: [WISPA] the best 120* Sector
To All,
What is the best 120* sector antenna, F-B ratio <-25-30dB, I wa
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
