layout?
Nick
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Sunday, June 6, 2004, at 04:02 AM, Kristof Neirynck wrote:
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
I've been trying to emulate, with CSS alone, what I've been doing for
years with tables: create a grid of thumbnails, each
Roy - ummm, did I miss a post? Can you point me to 'Bert's layout'?
Thanks
Nick
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Sunday, June 6, 2004, at 01:59 AM, RC Pierce wrote:
Bert's thumbnail layout is really quite straight forward. Wish I'd o'
thought of
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Gleitzman
Sent: Sunday, 6 June 2004 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions
Roy - ummm, did I miss a post? Can you point me to 'Bert's layout'?
Thanks
Nick
On a Mac: BBEdit, but I'm testing HyperEdit (still in beta) when I've
got time because it offers real-time side-by-side comparison of code
and result. Not 100% sure as yet of the rendering side, though...
Nick
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On
Wow. I (and no doubt every other Mac user in the world) will be shocked
and deeply perturbed to discover that we've wasted our money. I wonder
if Apple give refunds?
Let me suggest that the direction this thread is taking should stop
right here - it's gonna get off-topic (ie Mac v PC) really
On Sunday, June 6, 2004, at 08:59 PM, Neerav wrote:
Nick thats a top idea, have done as you suggest, adding links to the
top level parts of the menu eg: Products.
You're welcome.
Im sure you know that the probability of IE X (the next version) being
released as part of the next Windows
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 08:11 PM, Giles Clark wrote:
snip
Isn't it about time we took a more active role in shaping the future of
browsers. We could clearly state that as a community we write/develop
for a
list of acceptable browsers which comply to standards (we're just
going to
have to
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 01:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are going to make sites that only work in certain browsers why
not just
code to IE's standards and not bother with the obscure browsers like
firefox
and opera. That way we don't need standards at all! I can have my
My comments are mainly about the interface:
Can I suggest you use a list for the navigation bar at top? You have
for the one at bottom...
Maybe a bit more contrast in that navbar? even a bit more padding
around the words themselves?
You might like to look at the way the word 'SEOed' is
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Peter Firminger wrote:
Could it be that your site is broken, not the browser? We don't have
any
trouble accommodating IE with standards compliant code. I think your
taking
the argument too far and blaming the tool.
There are very few issues remaining if
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, at 01:51 PM, Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
The Chapters are in an unordered list that's displayed inline and
floated to the left. Of course the more proper browsers (Safari,
Mozillas, Opera, IE-Mac) are handling everything correctly...IE Win
however has decided to be
On Thursday, June 10, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Neerav wrote:
I foresee in my crystal ball a lot of headaches for web developers who
use popups Heres something that might help
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/
dnwxp/html/xpsp2websites.asp
Anybody else get a 404
be no space between
en-us/
and
dnwxp
in the link
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 403 8000 27
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On Thursday, June 10, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Neerav wrote:
I foresee in my crystal ball a lot of headaches for web developers
who use popups
Mark:
Mac OSX comes with a prog called Mail (known as Apple Mail), then
there's, I guess, Entourage for MS Office users, Outlook Express,
Eudora - and others.
I use Mail - which by logic should use the Safari engine for rendering
HTML - but I've had similar problems with unwanted white space
On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 06:56 PM, t94xr.net.nz webmaster wrote:
just in the art of humur?
What is Google?
Camz :D
www.fuckingkhtmlit.com
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
*
The discussion list
On Saturday, June 12, 2004, at 01:08 AM, Mary Wright wrote:
- there seems to be an extra 5px padding above and to the left of the
image in the banner div -
Hi Mary
Looks to me like there's an extra 5px all round the banner img - could
it be the padding: 5px declared for the div#banner that's
On Saturday, June 12, 2004, at 01:58 AM, Iain Gardiner wrote:
I've had a look at the site and CSS (nice-looking by
the way) and although I am pretty poor at analysing other people's
problems,
I think it might come down to theis rule:
#sidebar-a {
float: left;
width: 100px;
\width: 110px; /*
On Saturday, June 12, 2004, at 01:08 AM, Mary Wright wrote:
- there seems to be an extra 5px padding above and to the left of the
image in the banner div -
Mary - forgot to mention: the overall width of div#container in Safari
1.0.2 is 730px, but you've declared it at 710px - so the extra
On Saturday, June 12, 2004, at 09:03 AM, Christopher Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Where can I read about this work around?
Chris
Not sure if this works on all selectors, but try
http://www.info.com.ph/~etan/w3pantheon/style/modifiedsbmh.html
Nick
___
Omnivision. Websight.
On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 11:29 PM, Justin French wrote:
So, I'd like to experiment with a javascript/css based solution which
(preferably) is 100% accessible, based on a scroll box with simple up
and down arrows, etc.
Justin, take a look at the solution I came up with for two sites last
On Tuesday, June 15, 2004, at 04:29 PM, Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 6/14/04 11:21 PM t94xr.net.nz webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
excellent example
www.t94xr.net.nz/plinks/ http://www.t94xr.net.nz/plinks/>
Camz
Doesn't work in Safari, though?
Rick Faaberg
Which Safari? Works OK in
On Thursday, June 17, 2004, at 06:36 AM, Veine K Vikberg wrote:
My main problem is the blasted unordered list where the bullets
disappear in IE, and the picture going off to the left in Opera.
I don't see any css declaration at all for the ul; add one and you can
control bullet position. For
On Thursday, June 17, 2004, at 02:40 PM, Roger Williams wrote:
In IE for Mac or PC the middle div gets bumped around:
www.yogavillage.net
I have set all the widths accordingly and the middle div gets a
min-width of 430 px which is wider than the
center graphic.
Any ideas? i have a feeling that
On Sunday, June 20, 2004, at 04:37 AM, Roger Williams wrote:
When the browser is reduced in width to less than 800px the middle
content gets shoved down.
If the browser is wider then everything is fine.
OK, on closer observation:
Safari 1.0.2: the #middle div doesn't get shoved down; a
On Monday, June 21, 2004, at 05:11 PM, Michael Andrews wrote:
Hi,
Just thought I ask if there is bit of math or a web site that can
accurately convert pixels to ems.
If I want to size an image in ems so it will scale with text re-sizing
I kinda doing it manually at the moment by dividing by 12
On Thursday, June 24, 2004, at 09:31 PM, John Penlington wrote:
No problem getting the thumbnail-caption combinations to display using left floated divs - thanks to Russ Weakley's float tutorials.
But I just cannot find the way to get these thumbnail-caption combinations to align at the
On Thursday, June 24, 2004, at 11:01 PM, Trusz, Andrew wrote:
Couple of industrial strength options; both of which I've used. One is purely visual - organize the pictures by height. The pictures seem to come in roughly two heights so group them that way and they will mostly take care of
On Friday, June 25, 2004, at 12:22 AM, John Penlington wrote:
I just cannot find a CSS way to emulate the table cell attribute
*valign='bottom'*. If I can do that, I can solve the problem.
In the embedded CSS I've used a class table.gallery{vertical-align:
bottom;
...} and it works with the
On Monday, June 28, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Lachlan Hardy wrote:
I'm with Mike on this. I don't see a benefit. In fact, when I read the
article it looked like more work to me :
1. Hacks in main CSS file - Hack gets outdated, edit CSS file and
remove hack
2. Hacks in separate CSS file - Hack gets
Hard to tell exactly without seeing full context (a link is better than
a code extract), but why not do this and avoid the nested list:
ul
liDaddy raquo;/li
li/li
lia href=#Child A/anbsp; |/li
lia href=# Child B/anbsp; |/li
lia href=# Child C/anbsp; |/li
lia href=# Child D/anbsp; |/li
/ul
Nick
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, at 10:43 AM, Tim Lucas wrote:
I know that for Gecko based browsers background images defined in
stylesheets (inline or linked) are deferred from loading until they
are asked to display themselves. This also helps because many style
sheet rules containing images
On Monday, July 5, 2004, at 02:58 PM, Hugh Todd wrote:
We've had many, many calls for emails to this list to be posted in
plain text rather than HTML or rich text.
May I reiterate the call? A fair number of recent emails have shown up
in my email client with tiny, hard-to-read text.
So,
On Monday, July 5, 2004, at 08:49 PM, simon @ london web mill wrote:
Im a new boy to the discussion group. Pointed in this direction by
Jeffery Zeldman's 'Designing with Web Standards'. I must say Web
Standards has been a 'breathe of fresh air' for me. Its the way
forward, for sure. What Im
On Saturday, Jul 10, 2004, at 02:37 Australia/Sydney, Justin French
wrote:
- trigger active and inactive tabs on a menu navigation
(can't think of an example)
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors2/
N
___
On Tuesday, Jul 13, 2004, at 07:32 Australia/Sydney, Scott Reston wrote:
I'm attempting to build a horizontal menu that from an unordered list.
My plan is to provide the list as text in the html, then use an
image-replacement scheme (ala
On Tuesday, Jul 13, 2004, at 22:03 Australia/Sydney, Joe Leech wrote:
I know this really isn't strictly *standard* but...
I am using the css level 3 opacity property (and using the alpha
filter for IE) for various content boxes to show the background image.
However, I have just placed an image
On Friday, Jul 16, 2004, at 10:08 Australia/Sydney, Jad Madi wrote:
hmm
what I want is , for example
http://www.alistapart.com/d/slidingdoors2/v1/ex10a.html#
when I click on any tab to be active?
How to do it?
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:37:28 +1000, Dave Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you mean
On Tuesday, Jul 20, 2004, at 16:05 Australia/Sydney, James
Cowperthwaite wrote:
The layout problem occurs in IE (fine in mozilla). I want to keep the
text flowing down the page in a straight line, but in IE when the text
passes the end of the blue box, it moves in by 1 or 2 pixels
(illustrated
On Wednesday, Jul 21, 2004, at 18:21 Australia/Sydney, Neerav wrote:
http://photomatt.net/2004/07/16/mac-ie/
Current stats from Apple indicate that around 50% of Mac users
worldwide have made the move to OSX. The other half - still on OS9.x -
are very likely to be using IE5. Even some OSX users
On Friday, Jul 23, 2004, at 13:44 Australia/Sydney, Roly wrote:
a couple of questions, somewhat off topic
I would like to capture an image of the the whole html page i.e. what
is not visible in the scroll region, so the image would capture
something like an 800 x 3000 region to be printed in
On Wednesday, Jul 28, 2004, at 02:04 Australia/Sydney, Siteman DA -
Bent Inge wrote:
I'm aware of the problem with list items, and it sucks... But the
markup
(http://www.regnskapsbyraet.no/sider/designmal.php) can't be changed in
order for the menu to work. So the changes has to be made in the
You might also be interested in Zeldman's coverage of this concept at
http://www.zeldman.com/daily/0704d.shtml
- including the hassle that one UK coder experienced as a result...
I'd be very careful about publishing reworked versions of other
people's copyrighted materials, even if you have the
Using IE5 as your default browser for development is going to give you
these headaches every time. Build to a Standards-compliant browser -
Firefox is probably best if you're on a Mac - and *then* use the hacks
you need for IE5, but only if you *really* need to. Good css shouldn't
require
On Tuesday, Aug 10, 2004, at 22:46 Australia/Sydney, Nancy Johnson
wrote:
I am having trouble with server side includes working with documents
ending in .htm or .html. They only seem to work with .asp documents.
Change the file suffixes to .shtm or .shtml and your includes should
work OK.
Couple of real quick guesses:
1. You have both those classes styled with text-decoration: none. As
they're not links, that's redundant. Remove those styles.
2. Try giving the classes in question declared widths.
3. Actually, it may be the z-index value for the containing
#information - ? It's
I was wrong on all 3 counts. It's the IE Peekaboo bug; add height:1% to
your .credit declaration and the two floated classes appear... but the
black border of #information is then affected... bugger. It's too late
in the day; I'll have another look tomorrow, if someone hasn't already
come up
On Thursday, Aug 12, 2004, at 02:09 Australia/Sydney, Owen Gregory
wrote:
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Oh, and try using relative font sizes, rather than px; Windows users
can't resize your type if they want to when you use 11px as a font
size.
You must be fading, Nick. It's IE/Windows users who
On Friday, Aug 13, 2004, at 09:59 Australia/Sydney, Edd Hale wrote:
I am new to CSS and I am not sure if the image size (width and height)
should appear in the HTML or be handled by CSS. Thank you.
Edd
Aside from the validity/informational/decorative issues, the inclusion
of width and height
On Tuesday, Aug 17, 2004, at 09:38 Australia/Sydney, Seona Bellamy
wrote:
I have a couple of issues with the site I'm working on. They have been
reported by the client, and I'm having trouble reliably replicating
any of
them so I can't work out how to fix them.
Can someone please take a look
Pete, that's not a drawback - that's what list-style-position: inside is intended to do!
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Wednesday, Aug 18, 2004, at 09:45 Australia/Sydney, Peter Ottery wrote:
the only drawback i can see from that is that
On Wednesday, Aug 18, 2004, at 10:18 Australia/Sydney,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, putting in the form field into my global nav div cause the
brown
bar (especially in IE) to become quite wide and not look right. I do
recall reading somewhere some time ago that the form tag causes some
On Sunday, Aug 22, 2004, at 09:48 Australia/Sydney, Michael Kear wrote:
I was interested that the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity
Commission uses tables for layout in their web site at:
http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/index.html
On Tuesday, Aug 24, 2004, at 14:27 Australia/Sydney, John Horner wrote:
What would members recommend? Does this design, for instance, require
relative, not absolute positioning?
I haven't closely checked the the CSS, but in principal, yes -
absolutely (umm... yuh.).
I think your friend needs to
On Wednesday, Aug 25, 2004, at 18:49 Australia/Sydney, Mike Foskett
wrote:
Have you considered the documents appearance on a 160px wide PDA?
How about a Braille reader?
Surely you wouldn't deliver the layout CSS to either of these
devices... semantically structured text and (for the PDA)
On Friday, Aug 27, 2004, at 18:20 Australia/Sydney, Seona Bellamy wrote:
I know this sounds like a lot of extraneous steps, but it is on
the Admin side of the site and it to allow them to easily administer a
list
of something like 50,000 line items without having to scroll forever
or keep
going
On Friday, Aug 27, 2004, at 15:37 Australia/Sydney, Zaac Woodhead wrote:
Is it possible to apply css to a select drop down/multiple select list.
Have a design on my desk with a fully formatted selectl list -
including the arrows, etc. Iknow it does not meet standards, but
is this possbile?
On Sunday, Aug 29, 2004, at 09:09 Australia/Sydney, Seona Bellamy wrote:
Well, I've found a way around the problem (used an incrementing counter
instead of the ID-number from the database, so each item has a unique
ID) so
this question isn't exactly pressing any more.
I'd still love to know the
On Sunday, Aug 29, 2004, at 17:08 Australia/Sydney, Kim Kruse wrote:
I'm using the ALA tab menu (sliding doors) as my main nav. Now I've
been told that it breaks in Mac/IE5 into something like this... left
tab img - the link - right tab img. Is it possible to get it right in
Mac/IE5.2?
Hi Kim
Hi Lennart - welcome.
Your buttons are only visible for the width of the word used for your
links, plus its padding - so a bigger (wider) word reveals more of your
button. Try this:
#navlist li {
list-style: none;
margin: 4px;
float: left;
}
#navlist li a {
display: block;
...etc }
On Friday, Sep 24, 2004, at 10:40 Australia/Sydney, Daniela Meleo wrote:
NOW, the client has decided that after handover he will need the
ability to
easily add new pages whenever he needs to (as additional topics not yet
know become required.) He's an open source techie type and will hand
code
On 12 Oct 2004, at 1:27 PM, Focas, Grant wrote:
I've solved the Mac scrollbar problem.
http://www.homebass.info/fixedPosTest/
Now the only issue left (besides that it uses CSS hacks) is that the
back to top link only takes you to the top of the content div minus
the height of the header.
Grant
On 12 Oct 2004, at 2:55 PM, Focas, Grant wrote:
Using a body id will not work because the top of the page is alsways in
view. It is the top of the content div which is hidden.
Well, in that case I've misunderstood what you're trying to do with the
link. In all my Mac browsers (IE5.2, Safari 1.2,
On 12 Oct 2004, at 11:57 PM, Golding, Antony wrote:
In Firefox, Opera, etc the layout appears perfectly as required. In
IE6 however, below the final image some of the dd definition is
repeated. At present, the final dd contains '21/09/2004 at 13:05:02'
and beneath that, '5:02' appears. The
Chris Kennon wrote:
The four programs across have started a chain of DIVS that seem more
cumbersome than table cells. How would one recommend recreating this
in semantically correct CSS, without the tangled mess of DIVS I've
birthed.
Chris, before anything else, you have a fundamental error in
Genau Junior wrote:
Can anyone explain me why this browser freezes, when the mouse sets
over the css menu tab?
PS:
My css file still no validated and some classes are repeated, but on
final version, that will be fixed.
Rule #1 for problem-solving: eliminate variables. In this case:
On 13 Oct 2004, at 11:43 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Can you point me to this section in the w3.org specification. I'm not
doubting your expertise, but I'm confused why a class and id cannot
have the same name.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at 04:01 PM, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Chris, before anything
On 13 Oct 2004, at 6:13 PM, Jackie Reid wrote:
Hi everyone
im a bit confused here - trying to validate my css and i get this
warning
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as
a last alternative
what do they mean... i always do that and get the no errors or
warnings
On 15 Oct 2004, at 9:31 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Yeah everything is as low as it can go.
Considering each column has a minimum of 1 character+padding+margins I
cant see any possibility of all 80 columns fitting on 1 A4 page
I don't expect it to, but it would be nice if IE would allow stuff
that
On 16 Oct 2004, at 3:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
I'm not sure where I've gone wrong, but I must get a PC to check from
now on. Must go shopping. Oh no, will I actually own a PC.
Dreadful... Just teasing you PC folks. :)
I'm with you, Shane - I'd never use anything but a Mac as my main
On 18 Oct 2004, at 12:33 AM, Jorge Laranjo wrote:
Looks good in Safari 1.2.3 (v 125.9) in the Mac OS X.
In Attach i send you a Shoot of that look...
Jorge - please, no attachments to this list. 100KB+ for a message is
too big. If you would like to help out with screenshots, send them
off-list to
On Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004, at 20:29 Australia/Sydney, Rick Faaberg wrote:
At here:
http://www.lucernemedia.com/
I'm trying to shrink the whitespace after the video titles
(.video_title is
the relevant style I'm pretty sure).
See anything obvious that's keeping the whitespace so big after the
Uh - no... the point is that the markup doesn't change *regardless* of
what you do with it the css. Separation of content and presentation -
right? That's how come we can use ul's for horiz navbars, vertical
buttons, or whatever.
Neerav, in any case... What if you leave the Hx as block
On Saturday, Oct 2, 2004, at 19:32 Australia/Sydney, russ - maxdesign
wrote:
That does not take into account headings of different character
length. From
what I understand, the underline must be under the content only, no
matter
how long the content is.
Oh, OK - the bg image is being tiled,
I've never seen such 'nesting' listed anywhere in any CSS how-to info,
and I presume that (a) if it were possible, the technique would have
been published, and (b) it hasn't been published because it doesn't
work. Having said that, I haven't ever tested it, so I don't know for
sure...
What
On Monday, Oct 4, 2004, at 10:31 Australia/Sydney, Andreas Boehmer
wrote:
I am in the process of creating a FAQ section in one of my websites
and I
was wondering what would be the best tags to use for the
questions/answers?
Perhaps there is no standard, but I was wondering whether a
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 05:33 Australia/Sydney, Manuel González
Noriega wrote:
Genau Junior wrote:
Hello,
My friend is asking me if i can use tags
ul
ol/ol
/ul
No. Make it
ul
li
ol
liLong live lists!/li
/ol
/ul
Close, but no cigar. Make that
ul
liI love nested lists!
ol
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 10:19 Australia/Sydney, Parker Torrence
wrote:
Yes you can
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/lists.html
section 10.2
see DEPRECATED EXAMPLE:
~parker
OK, maybe so... but deprecated means it's not a good idea to use it
(just because it 'works' doesn't mean you should).
I have to say I'd use an extra class on the first li over that big
chunk o' Javascript any day. Apart from the extra code, what if I have
Javascript disabled?
My 2c...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 13:55
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 14:50 Australia/Sydney, Luke Moulton wrote:
So on one hand there's smaller file sizes, uncomplicated CSS (with
fewer
hacks) but imperfect semantics, and on the other there's perfect
semantics bloated CSS with a few hacks thrown in for good measure.
Where does one draw
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 22:31 Australia/Sydney, Genau Junior wrote:
I Would like to know about your oppinion for using tabular data with DIV> LI> or to use table> to show them.
I´ve been researching on the web about this discussion but i didn´t found an answer really straight.
I am
On Wednesday, Oct 6, 2004, at 03:26 Australia/Sydney, Ted Drake wrote:
I visit all of the sites and read all of the blogs about css design.
I've seen the use of filters and hacks to make IE5 mac work. But I'm
looking for a place to see what IE5 mac does differently. Do you know
of a good
Lorenzo wrote:
URL: http://196.36.166.35/tower
CSS: http://196.36.166.35/tower/s/tower.css
CSS: http://196.36.166.35/tower/s/navDropdown.css
1. In IE6, the border/background of the top list in the #steps layer
appears
hidden. Is there a way to fix this?
2. There's also a major gap on the left of
On Friday, Oct 8, 2004, at 23:37 Australia/Sydney, Richard Lake wrote:
I've added a top of page link as follows:
div class=topla href=#headerTop of page/a/div
and related CSS, as follows:
.topl {
float: right;
font-size: .75em;}
a.topl {
color: #660;
text-decoration: none;}
Paul, your CSS doesn't validate. This is failing:
div.sidebar {border-left: 1px solid #ccc; width: 200px; float: right;
padding-left: 5px; padding-vertical-align:text-top;}
Error: Property padding-vertical-align doesn't exist : text-top
Remember to validate!
The problem with IE5 lies with your
On 18 Oct 2004, at 6:05 AM, Mordechai Peller wrote:
Let me start by saying that I have enough experience with syntax
checker
to know that the error message doesn't always point to the right place
and that one error can generate many messages. But that being said, I
think this one takes the cake.
John Wells wrote:
Which begs the question, when a stylesheet is loaded up by a browser,
will that browser automatically attempt to load every referenced
image, regardless of it being called by the HTML file?
This question's come up before - and the answer is... (of course) it
varies from
On 22 Oct 2004, at 12:17 AM, Craig Millman wrote:
This is my first post, I have been silently gobbling up info.
I have designed a website for a friend www.pacifichomeloans.com.au
which
seems to look ok in IE on Windows, however not in Mac IE.
The css is at
On 22 Oct 2004, at 9:59 AM, Lyn Patterson wrote:
#[name of page] #container #floatimgleft {background-color: #dff;}
but it didn't work. Only the last mentioned (#floatimgleft) worked and
(#container) reverted to general background color. Is there a way to
combine them - have I left out commas
On 22 Oct 2004, at 10:15 AM, Nick Lo wrote:
p
label class=blank for=input_phone_1
select name=input_phone_1_type id=input_phone_1_type
option value=Please Select/option
option value=work selected=selectedwork/option
option value=homehome/option
option
Joshua Street wrote:
What's the recommended practice with indentation?
Uh - is there any reason not to use pre? What you're talking about is
really visual presentation, isn't it? I'd respectfully suggest that the
indentation is not adding anything to the semantics of the content or
the code. A
On 26 Oct 2004, at 9:37 AM, Natalie Buxton wrote:
Despite what I say on my site, I do not hate mac users, I am merely
envious of them. Who doesn't want such a pretty and fast machine?
Mmm. Maybe '...asking you rich bastards...' rather than 'telling' might
get you a little more sympathetic
On 26 Oct 2004, at 9:37 AM, Natalie Buxton wrote:
Woe is me. It's busted big time. And for the life of me I cannot work
out which CSS rules Safari and IE Mac are refusing to honour.
Two things:
In IE the navigation bar is sitting wrong.
In Safari it's the entire layout is busted big time.
Natalie,
On 29 Oct 2004, at 11:03 AM, Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
But my XHTML validation says something weird about the ul tags. Can
you say what I need.
XHTML Validation is showing 5 errors only.
3 of them can be fixed by adding 'alt' attributes to these files:
img
On 29 Oct 2004, at 6:07 PM, Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
Another question, is there a float:middle or center?
No. Use {margin:auto} for left right; whatever you need for top
bottom. Be aware that auto vertical centering is one of the few things
that CSS won't do. Try a Google search on 'CSS
On 2 Nov 2004, at 11:38 PM, Sam Hutchinson wrote:
Hi all,
Fairly new here and been monitoring list for a day or so, all very
useful stuff.
Anyway, i'm having a bit of trouble with hanging images - my right
image hangs into the footer on Mozilla - any ideas?
On 2 Nov 2004, at 11:38 PM, Sam Hutchinson wrote:
Hi all,
Fairly new here and been monitoring list for a day or so, all very
useful stuff.
Anyway, i'm having a bit of trouble with hanging images - my right
image hangs into the footer on Mozilla - any ideas?
On 3 Nov 2004, at 9:34 AM, Kevin Futter wrote:
I've noticed this about Firefox too - it appears that the status bar
belongs
to the parent window, and child tabs open in the same window will
inherit
any status bar wrangling that is applied to that window. IMHO this is a
minor flaw in the way
On 6 Nov 2004, at 11:15 PM, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a new personal site about 1.5 weeks ago. My pages are
valid XHTML and they display fine in MSIE 5.5-6 on PC, Safari, Opera,
Firefox but MSIE 5.2 on MacOS X cuts off the page at the bottom. I
have no idea why
On 7 Nov 2004, at 9:26 AM, The Man With His Guide Dog At The Tent Store
wrote:
script language=Javascript type=text/javascript
src=AccessKeyJavaScript.js/script
Yup, that's fine - for HTML4.
You might, however, like to look at standardising your tags in lower
case - you currently have a mix of
On 10 Nov 2004, at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have given each page a body id and each list item in DIV sidebar an
id as
well but it breaks when I use the following: I will be creating
different
templates for the two areas Staff and Students so am not concerned
about
that list.
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
