> 10> all attempts to unmount the "stale" loopback
> mount fail
that's because lofs(7FS) does not support forcibly unmounts.
6296637 Support of force unmount for loop back filesystem lofs
---
frankB
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zo
Hey Ed, I want to comment on the NFS aspects involed here,
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
>
>well, it all depends on what nfs shares are actually being exported.
I definitively think we do want to abstain from that much programmatic
attempts inside the Zones framework
Hey Ed, addition to my previous posting as I just noticed something I've totally
forgotten about
> afaik, determining the mount point should be pretty
> strait forward. i was planning to get a list of all the shares
> exported by the specified nfs server, and then do a strncmp() of all the
> e
> workaround_2 (as reported in the bug):
> - rebooting into single user, entering "maintenance
> mode" as "root" and image-updating from there.
> --
this workaround is BAD as Evan just discovered:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threa
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:08:28 +0200, GGallagher
wrote:
Is it supported to use a hostname rather than an IP address when
creating a new interface for a zone? This will not be the primary
interface for the zone.
I have a need to do this because the IP address needs to change when we
brin
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:27:40 +0200, LaoTsao wrote:
interesting, IMHO, this type of change will make many many s10 users
unhappy
I assume you are refering to Mike's response that zones require their own
seperate ZFS dataset going forward ? if so can you give some reasons
why this would make c
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:16:35 +0200, Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao 老曹) Ph.D.
wrote:
hi
in doing an OS upgrade from s10u5 to s10u8
I try to use zoneadm detach then upgrade OS then attach
the system doesnot allow attach -U ...no such options
but the man page in u8 say
http://download.oracle.com/doc
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:39:41 +0100, Mike Gerdts
wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 at 08:32PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 10/10/11 07:20 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:23:30PM -0700, Michael Speer wrote:
>>All,
>>
>>I have two questions based on what I have been seeing where I do
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:50:25 +0100, Enda o'Connor - Oracle Ireland -
Software Engineer wrote:
fwiw, on 175b I do have the file but not the package installed which
claims to deliver it ;-)
osoldev.batschul./.=> ls -la
/usr/share/auto_install/manifest/zone_default.xml
-r--r--r-- 1 root sys 236
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:53:06 +0100, Mike Gerdts
wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 at 02:42PM, Frank Batschulat wrote:
fwiw, on 175b I do have the file but not the package installed which
claims to deliver it ;-)
That statement is worrisome. I think, however, it is not correct
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:49:57 +0100, Mike Gerdts
wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 at 02:53PM, Frank Batschulat wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:53:06 +0100, Mike Gerdts
wrote:
>On Thu 10 Nov 2011 at 02:42PM, Frank Batschulat wrote:
>>fwiw, on 175b I do have the file but not the package
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:48:09 +0100, Ian Collins wrote:
may be you need to run attach -U instead
-U? There isn't a documented -U option.
zoneadm attach -U was a new feature we introduced with s10 Update 9
to perform a full update, pls. refer to page #4 here
http://blogs.sun.com/batschul/re
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:19:10 +0100, Mahesh Siddheshwar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Glenn Faden wrote:
4) A bug currently prevents a client instance and a server instance
from being safe to use on the same box (apologies, can't quote the
bugid from here). How likely, in
friends,
I went back and forth with th bug pertaining the [-x nodataset] option
6880288 zoneadm install -x nodataset option should be brand-specifc
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6880288
and eventually I decided to ask for quorum to just bury this option
entirely.
Wh
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:31:55 +0100, xx wrote:
> i'm still not doing something right:
>
> init...@dogpatch:~# pkg install SUNWs10brand
> Creating Plan
> pkg: The following pattern(s) did not match any packages in the current
> catalog.
> Try relaxing the pattern, refreshing and/or examining the c
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:01:19 +0100, Ric Aleshire wrote:
> Vincent Boisard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just installed a new opensolaris dev b128a machine from an iso downloaded
>> from genunix.
>>
>> I tried to install a zone but it failed:
>> r...@pasiphae:~# zoneadm -z template install
>> A ZFS file
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:54:05 +0100, Jordan Vaughan
wrote:
> I need someone to review my fix for
>
> 6882732 unpacking archive with extended file attributes reports errors
>
> The webrev is accessible via
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
looks good to me.
cheers
---
frankB
is it to be expected that after no zoneadm/zoneadmd is running
anymore, /var/run/zones still contains the corresponding lock files ?
(also I looked at the current threadlist of my system and no zone releated
kernel threads are running anymore)
osoldev.root./var/run/zones.=> zoneadm list -cp
0:gl
friends, may I request code review for the earth-shattering fix to:
6495558 zoneadm -z boot should not only check but repair filesystems
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnv-vplat/
backround:
Evaluation
when booting a zone, zoneadm ( ie. vplat.c:dofsck() ) should perform the same
tasks as
sounds somewhat similar to
6773836 zoneadm halt or halting/rebooting a non-global zone hangs the global
zone
I'll try to reproduce this using your test case and see what I find. please
file a bug
if it's still happen with 128 and is not fixed by 6894901 as Steve suggested.
cheers
frankB
On
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:06:43 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> sounds somewhat similar to
>
> 6773836 zoneadm halt or halting/rebooting a non-global zone hangs the global
> zone
wrong cut+past I did ment to say:
6734679 zoneadm halt hung during zones test
> I'll t
> i know that some s10 deployments use that.
>
> ed
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> friends, may I request code review for the earth-shattering fix to:
>>
>> 6495558 zoneadm -z boot should not only check but repair fil
Glenn, I've been running this test case now for nearly a day on build 129,
could'nt
reproduce at all. good chance this being indeed fixed by 6894901 in build 128.
I'll also try to reproduce this now on buil 126.
cheers
frankB
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:48:52 +0100, Glenn Brunette
wrote:
>
> As p
details in your
environment that I don't have or if that script really reliably reproduces
6894901
cheers
frankB
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:23:06 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> Glenn, I've been running this test case now for nearly a day on build 129,
> could'nt
> r
special that I am missing.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:49:25 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> Glenn, I've not been able to reproduce this on onnv build 126 (it's running
> for a day now)
>
> if that script would reproduce 6894901 straight away it should be doing so
> o
May I have 2 code reviewers for:
6911329 Incorrect code in kstat_delete causes panic
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnvkstat/
Description
A colleague was looking into a crash and the reason turned out to be a NULL
pointer dereference in kstat_delete():
kstat_delete(kstat_t *ksp)
{ k
d
here's the new webrev for your consideration:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnv-vplat/
thanks!
frankB
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:37:49 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> valid point, Ed!
>
> ignoring the minor detail that my fix should really
> do 'fsck
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:16:19 +0100, Dan Price wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:17:50PM +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> > May I have 2 code reviewers for:
>> >
>> > 6911329 Incorrect code in kstat_delete causes panic
>> > htt
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:28:52 +0100, Jordan Vaughan
wrote:
> I expanded my webrev to include my fix for
>
> 6910339 zonecfg coredumps with badly formed 'select net defrouter'
>
> I need someone to review my changes. The webrev is still accessible via
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:55:34 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> a good argument could probably be made to turn this assert into a real
> check and return Z_INVAL for any of those 3 being 0 and get rid of
> the checks inside the xml parsing loop ?
probably rather Z_INSUFFICIENT_
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:46:00 +0100, Jordan Vaughan
wrote:
> I need someone to review my fix for
>
> 6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error
> from an s10 zone due to boot-archive
>
> My webrev is accessible via
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
Jo
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:34:59 +0100, Jordan Vaughan
wrote:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-zone2
[...]
> zone_lookup_nwif() needs the three loop checks.
>
> I regenerated the webrev. You'll notice that the assertion was replaced
> by a check that returns Z_INSUFFICIENT_SPEC.
Hey Jo
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:46:00 +0100, Jordan Vaughan
> wrote:
>
>> I need someone to review my fix for
>>
>> 6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error
>> from an s10 zone due to boot-archive
>>
>> My webrev is accessible via
>>
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/
ssible for you to try the steps above on a fresh
> install of 2009.06 or later (b129 is where I am right now). Also,
> if you have other debugging methods, please let me know.
>
> I am going to kick this off again to see if I can catch any
> error messages.
>
> g
>
>
>
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:55:21 +0100, Tristan Ball
wrote:
> I've got a Opensolaris snv_129 VM with which I'm playing around with
> zones.. Initially everything was fine, however since my initial install
> the opensolaris dev repository has updated to release 130, and now I
> can't install new zone
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:02:33 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:
> While I have seen many warnings explicitly noting that an NFS server should
> never be its own client
>(including sharing global shares to local zones), I confess I have failed to
>find any specific grounds for that.
simplified reasons a
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:28:35 +0100, Glenn Brunette
wrote:
> Just an update. I am still able to get the repeatable hangs, but I am
> still not able to generate a dump. If anyone has any further ideas as
> to how to troubleshoot this please let me know!
Hey Glenn, you are not fogotten, I shall
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:02:47 +0100, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> I've been playing around with zones on NFS a bit and have run into
> what looks to be a pretty bad snag - ZFS keeps seeing read and/or
> checksum errors. This exists with S10u8 and OpenSolaris dev build
> snv_129. This is likely a blocker
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:55:13 +0100, Darren J Moffat
wrote:
> Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> This just can't be an accident, there must be some coincidence and thus
>> there's a good chance
>> that these CHKSUM errors must have a common source, either in Z
Hey Jim, I've put a pointer to this suggestion into the bugs public comments
so the engineer working it gives it a try.
cheers
frankB
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:32:47 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:
> I'm trying to "zoneadm attach -u" while importing my zones from snv_117 to a
> system with snv_129.
>
>
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:33:06 +0100, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> I've written a dtrace script to get the checksums on Solaris 10.
> Here's what I see with NFSv3 on Solaris 10.
jfyi, I've reproduces it as well using a Solaris 10 Update 8 SB2000 sparc client
and NFSv4.
much like you I also get READ error
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:26:17 +0100, Glenn Brunette
wrote:
> Just verified that something is still wrong in b129, but the problem is
> _not_ with a vanilla configuration. This time around boot/halt #102,
> the system apparently shutdown/panic'ed? I was running it overnight
> and came in to a sy
Hiya,
from the code the zcons module is supposed to be unloadable.
314 _fini(void)
315 {
316 int err;
317
318 if ((err = mod_remove(&modlinkage)) != 0) {
319 return (err);
320 }
321
322 ddi_soft_state_fini(&zc_s
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:25:25 +0100, Edward Pilatowicz
wrote:
> well, the module is indeed unloadable:
> ---8<---
> edp{ro...@mcescher$ modinfo | grep zcons
> edp{ro...@mcescher$ modload -p drv/zcons
> edp{ro...@mcescher$ modinfo | grep zcons
> 301 f880a5b0 1ad0 164 1 zcons (Zone con
Hiya, I observed that zone datasets are mounted even though no zones are
running.
this strikes me like a bug ? aren't they supposed to be mounted only when the
zone boots ?
example from build 130:
osoldev.root./export/home/batschul.=> zoneadm list -cp
0:global:running:/::ipkg:shared
-:zone2:in
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:57:09 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> Hiya, I observed that zone datasets are mounted even though no zones are
> running.
>
> this strikes me like a bug ? aren't they supposed to be mounted only when the
> zone boots ?
>
&
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:30:39 +0100, Gael wrote:
>> This is bug:
>>
>> 6857294 zoneadm attach leads to partially installed packages
>>
>> I believe a T patch might be available for the S10 SVr4 packaging code
>> if you need it, but I see that the fix has not yet been integrated
>> into the nv SVr4
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:33:38 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> the bad news is, I'm not getting the dumps, sigh. this is due to bug:
>
> 6911155 kernel dump fails if panic happens in interrupt service routine
>
> which is fixed in build 131.
>
> So I will persue
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:03:11 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 25-1-2010 12:30, Paul van der Zwan schr
>> Unfortunately I am running into bug 6912829 ( causes panic on zoneadm halt )
>> quite often.
>>
>
> Do or don't zones work correctly on OpenSolaris-b131?
if you are using exclusive IP stac
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:22:59 +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> I get very very frustrated. I installed a zone on my opensolaris b131
> and all went well. The zone boots OK.
> Then it's time for the "zlogin -C" but no matter what, I always seem to
> choose the wrong keyboard and so all I get pressin
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:11:19 +0100, Ted Ward wrote:
> I am trying to migrate a zone on OpenSolaris from one identical system
> to another. It's going from x86 to sparc, but even when going from x86
> to x86 I get the same error. Here's the build of both systems
>
> SunOS hostname 5.11 snv_111b
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:30:18 +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> Going from OpenSolaris b131 to b132..
> Am I correct in this procedure:
> [1] pkg image-update (with zones attached)
> [2] after reboot to the new BE detach the zones
> [3] zoneadm attach -u zones
precisely
> OR, do I have to detach -
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:47:36 +0100, Christine Tran
wrote:
> Hi, I'm sorry to bug the OpenSolaris for a question that pertains to
> S10U8, but I am really stuck.
>
> I am doing a zoneadm clone -m copy, and I do not want a new ZFS
> dataset even though my zonepath is on a ZFS filesystem, for
> per
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:47:45 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> so lets wait for build 132...I'll also look at your dump from your test system
> on monday, but I suspect it'll be the same IP panic...
Hey Glenn, so I finally managed testing latest ISC with this stress te
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:45:01 +0100, Ben wrote:
> What are the differences between native and ipkg zones?
> When I did one of the Solaris 10 admin courses we learnt how zones use parts
> of the global-zone (for example using global-zone directories like /etc
> etc...).
That is one of the differ
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:58:11 +0100, Christine Tran
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home)
> wrote:
>>
>> a '-x nodataset' option for 'clone' like in 'install' is unlikely going to
>> happen, in
>> fact I wi
May I request 2 code reviewers for the changes for:
6914152 zonecfg fails when less(1M) is missing
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914152
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/zpager/
thanks!
frankB
1) old failure when $PAGER was bogus:
osoldev.root./export/home/batsc
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:39:21 +0100, Jerry Jelinek
wrote:
> On 02/19/10 06:53, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> May I request 2 code reviewers for the changes for:
>>
>> 6914152 zonecfg fails when less(1M) is missing
>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:15:10 +0100, Anil wrote:
> I am trying to rename a zonename (and zonepath) to a new zone. But I get this
> error:
>
> # zfs rename zones/bugs zones/note
> cannot rename 'zones/bugs': child dataset with inherited mountpoint is used
> in a non-global zone
thats correct, zf
jfyi, if you do 'pkg image-upgrade' from build (132) to build 133 and you do
have
non-global zones in the installed state, you may run into:
Bug 14668 - pkg directory action does work when there is none
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14668
note that you should only hit this i
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:49:46 +0100, Paul van der Zwan
wrote:
> I upgraded my system from b132 to b133 this weekend and I got error messages
> when I ran attach -u to upgrade my zones.
> The second run of the install of updated packages fails.
> In the log I find:
>
> $ pfexec cat /var/tmp/dns.a
May I have 2 code reviewers for the following minor changes for:
PSARC/2010/008 Remove zoneadm install sub-option "-x nodataset"
6880288 retire zoneadm install -x nodataset option
6890415 zoneadm install fails but returns 0
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/nodataset/
thanks!
frankB
Notes:
f
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:33:06 +0100, Anil wrote:
> r...@vps1:~# zoneadm -z note move /zones/note
> Moving across file systems; copying zonepath /zones/bugs...sh[1]: cd:
> /zones/bugs: [No such file or directory]
> zoneadm: zone 'note': 'copy' failed with exit code 1.
>
> The copy failed.
> More i
update on this one:
a workaround if you so will, or the more appropriate way to do this is
apparently
to use lofiadm(1M) to create a pseudo block device comprising the file hosted
on NFS
and use the created lofi device (eg. /dev/lofi/1) as the device for zpool create
and all subsequent I/O (thi
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:27:21 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home)
wrote:
> however contrary to this description and your case, in my tests this just
> renames
> the zfs mount point property and does notthing else, even when the move would
> cross
> file system boundaries:
>
>
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:01:54 +0100, Robert Bailey wrote:
> Using Dtrace to monitor non-global zones
> Current defined zone states from zone.h
> /* zone_status */
> typedef
> enum {
> ZONE_IS_UNINITIALIZED = 0,
> ZONE_IS_READY,
> ZONE_IS_BOOTING,
> ZONE_IS_RUNNING,
> ZONE_IS_SHUTTING_DOWN,
> ZONE_
On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:47:41 +0200, Philippe Bürgisser
wrote:
> I followed the guide
> (http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2450/gcgnc?l=en&a=view) from sun to
> move a working zone into a new server with the same configuration.
>
> I executed those commands :
>
> tar xf myzone.tar --> to /ex
On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:31:27 +0200, wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a way to get a zoneid from kernel even though
> it's not in user context. If it's possible, this is useful for us to
> activate an HCA port in the exclusive-IP zone at boot time.
>
> Here's the background info.
>
> Currently t
On Fri, 28 May 2010 01:01:11 +0200, Edward Pilatowicz
wrote:
> hey all,
>
> i wanted to propose zone community leadership status for the following
> folks:
>
> Frank Batschulat
> Gary Pennington
> John Levon
> Susan Kamm-Worrell
+1
__
On Fri, 28 May 2010 10:43:22 +0200, wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> getzoneid() can return a correct value even if it's called in a taskq thread
> (kernel context) and/or in an interrupt handler (interrupt context)?
I suppose so, look its not doing anything earth shattering:
2496 getzoneid(void)
2
On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:35:07 +0200, James Carlson
wrote:
> On 05/28/10 04:57, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 10:43:22 +0200, wrote:
>>>
>>> getzoneid() can return a correct value even if it's called in a taskq thread
>>> (kerne
On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:35:07 +0200, James Carlson
wrote:
> On 05/28/10 04:57, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 10:43:22 +0200, wrote:
>>
>>> getzoneid() can return a correct value even if it's called in a taskq thread
>>> (kernel c
just noticed something strange, perhaps someone has an explanation ?
after booting a zone and login to that:
osoldev.batschul./export/home/techdocs/solaris_kernel/zones.=> pfexec zoneadm
-z zone2 boot
osoldev.batschul./export/home/techdocs/solaris_kernel/zones.=> ps -eafd -Z |
grep login
glo
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:53:03 +0200, wrote:
>
>>osoldev.batschul./export/home/techdocs/solaris_kernel/zones.=> ps -eafd -Z |
>>grep login
>> global root 3822 975 0 07:59:39 pts/2 0:00 zlogin zone2
>> zone2 root 3823 3822 0 07:59:39 ?? 0:00 /usr/bin/login -z
>>
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:36:51 +0200, Daniel Dinu wrote:
> zone1 is installed in /vol1/zone1 and zone2 in /vol1/zone2.
> zone1 was configured as a "sparse root" zone (I used "create" command).
> zone2 was configured as a "whole root" zone (I used "create -b" command).
> Still, the space used is the
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:03:20 +0200, Richard L. Hamilton
wrote:
>> I would like to upgrade a Thumper we use as a staging
>> server for backups form Solaris 10 to OpenSolaris. The backup
>> application (NetVault) is only supported on Solaris.
>>
>> So my question is: can a branded Solaris 10 zone
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:03:56 +0200, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> "Frank Batschulat (Home)" wrote:
>
>> the problem with exporting the tape device to a NGZ, which although
>> not "supported" can be achived as you mention,
>> is that there's no wa
77 matches
Mail list logo
