On Jun 29, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
If I know Andreas he won't do ZODB releases... So, apart from
updating version.txt, CHANGES.txt, etc. and making a tag, I don't
think there would be much else to a ZODB release... *wink* :)
hmm, i'm not sure if i should do any zo
On 28 Jun 2007, at 17:03 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should
fix
the zclasses
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should fix
the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken.
That change n
--On 26. Juni 2007 15:00:23 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't we need a released 3.3.x?
Right, right. I meant to say: What's the matter with the latest Zope
3.3.x release? Are there any bugfixes in the Zope 3.3 branch that Zope 2
is waiting for? Otherwise w
On 26 Jun 2007, at 14:56 , Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:09 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
true, but i think philip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:09 , Andreas Jung wrote:
>> --On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> true, but i th
On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:09 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time
being. i agree the fix should be backpor
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shouldn't the Zope2 trunk be using ZODB 3.8 at this point? And
won't we
therefore get Jim's fix?
The 2.11 integration branch also uses ZODB 3.8. So
On Jun 25, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Back to the original subject...any objections to merge this 2.11
integration
branch back on the trunk *with* failing ZClasses tests.
hmm, maybe you lost me somewhere, but aren't we talking about your
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> --On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> --On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think some time ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> --On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule).
>> OK. I also promised to
--On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule).
OK. I also promised to merge #2153, that gives me time to do that
(unless somebody protests).
http:/
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule).
OK. I also promised to merge #2153, that gives me time to do that
(unless somebody protests).
http://zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2153
--
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
ht
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:27:48 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new
maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10.
On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new
maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10.
when are they due? unfortunately i won't be able to do the
backporting
bef
--On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time
being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even
volunteer to do it, if
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time
being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even
volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :)
That would be great, especially since we're on th
On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should fix
the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken.
That change needs backporting, I think, to the ZODB 3.6 line (for
2.9)
and
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should fix
the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken.
That change needs backporting, I think, to the ZODB 3.6 line (for 2.9)
and 3.7 line (for 2.10).
true, but i think philipp was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Btw, if I interpret http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76390&view=rev
correctly, it sounds like Tres has found a solution to that ZClass
bug. We just need to pr
On Jun 21, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
and btw, andreas' branch[1] produces no test failures for me (at
r76878) anyway, so imho we're good to go! :)
and just fyi, the 2.10 branch[1] using zodb 3.8 also has no
failures... (i still need to merge in recent changes from the
regu
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Btw, if I interpret http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76390&view=rev
correctly, it sounds like Tres has found a solution to that ZClass
bug. We just need to propogate the patch to Zope 3.3/2.10 and trunk/
trunk. Right, Tres?
What I fixed was
On 20 Jun 2007, at 13:01 , Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration
branch?
If not,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
>> --On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration
>
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:29:29 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration
bra
On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration
branch?
If not, I'd like to see it merged, now that ZODB 3.8 has beta'ed.
The only outstan
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration branch?
If not, I'd like to see it merged, now that ZODB 3.8 has beta'ed.
The only outstanding issues are ZClasses. If we merge this branc
28 matches
Mail list logo
