(Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:00:08PM -0500) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
Am Samstag, den 26.11.2005, 21:17 -0400 schrieb David Pratt:
Hi. I am looking at how to implement a RESTful web service in Zope2.
Could you expand a bit on whatever a RESTful web service is?
Hi Tino,
I
how do I do an auto-refresh to my browser with dtml? anyone have any ideas?
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML
On 28 Nov 2005, at 09:53, Allen Huang wrote:
how do I do an auto-refresh to my browser with dtml? anyone have
any ideas?
Please don't confuse server-side code (like DTML) with browser-side
code (like Javascript and HTML). DTML cannot refresh your browser.
Use Javascript or HTML.
jens
Allen Huang schrieb:
how do I do an auto-refresh to my browser with dtml? anyone have any ideas?
_when_ do you want to refresh?
dtml-call expr=REQUEST.RESPONSE.setHeader('Refresh','10')
or something like that should work. See rfc2616 for headers
and zope-book for API of RESPONSE object.
Andreas Jung wrote:
I agree that is should be replaced but I also mentioned that we tried to
achieve that already some years ago and we gave upso talking about
deprecation really makes sense when someone puts a replacement module on
the table. I know that the DateTime module is a piece
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I agree that is should be replaced but I also mentioned that we tried
to achieve that already some years ago and we gave upso talking
about deprecation really makes sense when someone puts a replacement
module on the table. I know that the
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
| 2. If we find it's possible, we rid the current DateTime implementation
| and recreate the DateTime class by subclassing datetime.datetime. For
| backwards compatability, we make sure that old pickles can be revived
| and that the old
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
| 2. If we find it's possible, we rid the current DateTime implementation
| and recreate the DateTime class by subclassing datetime.datetime. For
| backwards compatability, we make sure that old pickles can be
On 11/28/05, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Datetimes are dull values, they should just pickle nicely.
They do. A module with extra utilities + timezone support would be nice.
1. Create some extensive tests about how DateTime currently works. I'm
currently working on this
Hi,
I'm a little bit puzzled why there are growing Number of Mails telling
that the support for FastCGI will disappear in the future. Why is this.
I am running multiple sites that are hybrides of apache/php and zope. It's
very easy to set up such a config with mod fastcgi and Apache. It works
--On 28. November 2005 13:28:19 +0100 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm a little bit puzzled why there are growing Number of Mails telling
that the support for FastCGI will disappear in the future. Why is this.
I am running multiple sites that are hybrides of apache/php and
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
mod_proxy does
open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same
connection
for all requests. The is no problem on low load. But with growing
load, this
can
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Datetimes are dull values, they should just pickle nicely.
They do.
Yes, that's my point. That's why we don't need added persistency.
A module with extra utilities + timezone support would be nice.
pytz provides some extensive timezone support. Not sure what the extra
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
mod_proxy does
open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same
connection
for all requests. The is
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:05, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
mod_proxy does
open new connection for every request while fastcgi
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:07:49PM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:05, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:25, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped
forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great
thing to keep, volunteer.
I would if I had the time and the knowlege. But I don't see a Problem
with the Code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Tino.
Here are a couple of links that describe it. Boils down to using
regular GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE over HTTP using specific URI's to
invoke actions - sort of like XMLRPC over HTTP. It occurred to me that
perhaps
(Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:28:56AM -0500) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
From: Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a little bit puzzled why there are growing Number of Mails telling
that the support for FastCGI will disappear in the future. Why is this.
I am running multiple sites
Bitte schick das auf die Liste. Ich habe keine Lust solche Diskussionen
privat zu führen.
Danke,
Andreas
--On 28. November 2005 14:05:22 +0100 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard
Hi. Thanks Tres and Sascha for replies. Sascha, I think this is right
way to go and will make a product to do this and put the templates into
skins. As far as URL's, I was hoping to do something like:
http://mydomain.com/folder_to_resource/resource_id
but I guess it will be enough to append
--On 28. November 2005 13:28:20 + Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:25, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped
forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great
thing to keep, volunteer.
I
On 28 Nov 2005, at 14:23, Andreas Jung wrote:
I agree. There should be one supported way to achive a goal. In the
past we had at least three methods to run Zope (fortunately we
kicked PCGI support
in the past). My suggestion is to deprecate FCGI officially in the
docs and through a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 28. November 2005 13:28:20 + Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:25, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped
forward to support it, so it
On 28 Nov 2005, at 14:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
Sure I object. Why should perfectly working code be removed. There is
no alternativ for heavy loaded sites which need integration of apache
and zope. mod_proxy is no alternativ because it raises the load even
further.
Sorry, I have to call
--On 28. November 2005 15:52:25 +0100 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sure I object. Why should perfectly working code be removed. There is
no alternativ for heavy loaded sites which need integration of apache
and zope. mod_proxy is no alternativ because it raises the load even
Yeah, if POST and GET are desired to have semantic differences, your
code will have to explicitly check request['REQUEST_METHOD'].
On 11/28/05, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trickiest thing about REST from Zope's point of view is that its
proponents seem to think POST (which is a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:29:22PM +0100, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I don't have exakt numbers. We started with pcgi and had heavy problems
under load. They disapeared with the fastCGI module coming wird zope 2.6
i gues. I ve tried mod_proxy back than but had many problems. I can not
test on
I have had to reinstall Plone and Zope on my computer. I now find that when
I try to log into ZMI and http://localhost:8080/manage comes up, it tells me
that I am not authorised to view this resource. I am using the correct user
name and password. I would be gratefu if anyone could suggest
Hello everyone:
We have published a draft set of formation documents
for the Zope Foundation. A zip file of the complete
set of docs is available online at:
o http://tinyurl.com/7crf8
The next steps in the process are:
o Community review, comment, incorporate feedback
cycle(s) (one or
On 28 Nov 2005 at 8:26, Tres Seaver wrote:
requests onto *any* publishable method, which means that you have to
try hard to abide by the RESTriction. Zope also supports using PUT
for resource creation, which the REST folks don't seem to get.
I'm not sure what part REST folks don't seem to
Tim Nash wrote at 2005-11-27 16:16 -0800:
...
Does anybody know how to monkey patch 2.8.0 so zope can process an xform? I
found the xmlFix patch but a fellow zope user pointed out that 2.8.1 breaks
the monkey patch because of the
zope.app.publication.HTTPPublicationRequestFactory object.
Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-27 21:17 -0500:
...
I've seen the same symptoms a number of times recently with zope 2.7.x.
In our case, it seems to be related to ZEO. Zope seems to have lost
its connection to ZEO but doesn't realize it somehow. My theory is
that the symptom starts when all worker
Look at the SECURITY.txt file in your ZOPE/doc folder. There you can find instructions to solve your problem.
José Henrique.2005/11/28, Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have had to reinstall Plone and Zope on my computer.I now find that whenI try to log into ZMI and http://localhost:8080/manage
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:08 +, Mark Smith wrote:
I am using the correct user
name and password. I would be gratefu if anyone could suggest how
to resolve this problem.
Reinitialize the zope admin password? or just create a zope admin user
with:
# /path/to/zopectl adduser a_name
How do I determine which version of Plone/Zope I am using? Is there a
version file somewhere in the Zope hierarchy? I can't seem to find one.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
- Asad
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
Just look in the Management Interface, in the Control Panel ...
J.F.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asad
Habib
Sent: November 28, 2005 3:54 PM
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: [Zope] Zope Version
How do I determine which version of Plone/Zope
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:19:23PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-27 21:17 -0500:
...
I've seen the same symptoms a number of times recently with zope 2.7.x.
In our case, it seems to be related to ZEO. Zope seems to have lost
its connection to ZEO but doesn't
Hi. I looked in there already but it does not state the version. This is
what it says:
Zope Version (unreleased version, python 2.3.3, darwin)
- Asad
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote:
Just look in the Management Interface, in the Control Panel ...
J.F.
-Original
Ah yes, some earlier zope 2.7 versions had that problem ... And at some
point, python 2.3.4 and then 2.3.5 became the recommended python versions.
So you're probably somewhere between 2.7 and 2.7.3 ... 2.7.4 prefers python
2.3.4.
You can always do a grep -r 2.7 * from the root of your Zope
You can also look near the top of doc/CHANGES.txt in your
zope software tree.
-PW
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:08:03PM -0500, Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote:
Ah yes, some earlier zope 2.7 versions had that problem ... And at some
point, python 2.3.4 and then 2.3.5 became the recommended python
On 11/24/05, Brian Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have for a while successfully used the ASP404 script (
http://www.zope.org/Members/hiperlogica/ASP404) front ending part of a zope server using IIS on Win2000.
Recently I changed the front end server to Win2003. I have been attempting to
look at doc/CHANGES.txt
--On 28. November 2005 15:54:23 -0500 Asad Habib [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do I determine which version of Plone/Zope I am using? Is there a
version file somewhere in the Zope hierarchy? I can't seem to find one.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
- Asad
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:29:22PM +0100, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I don't have exakt numbers. We started with pcgi and had heavy problems
under load. They disapeared with the fastCGI module coming wird zope 2.6
i gues. I ve tried
Log message for revision 40388:
some minor reshifting
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/DateTime/interfaces.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/DateTime/interfaces.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/lib/python/DateTime/interfaces.py
Log message for revision 40389:
Use ObjectCopiedEvent with an 'original' parameter.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/OFS/CopySupport.py
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/OFS/ObjectManager.py
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/OFS/OrderSupport.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 40390:
Merged 40389 from 2.9 branch:
Use ObjectCopiedEvent with an 'original' parameter.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/CopySupport.py
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/ObjectManager.py
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/OrderSupport.py
-=-
Modified:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andrew Milton wrote:
-1 for any scheme that involves diddling the ZODB to 'fix' pickles, because
you just know you're going to corrupt someone's ZODB, and that's just
noone's idea of fun.
There are sensible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello,
Benji recently changed test.py in Z3 in order to avoid collision name
with the standard python 'test' module.
I bumped into the same problem running tests under Z 2.8.
I would like to add this
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:35, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello,
Benji recently changed test.py in Z3 in order to avoid collision
name
with the standard python 'test' module.
I bumped into the same problem running
Yes, I know that this is possible. But are you really proposing
to start a project like this? Or do you mean Five is going or should
go in this direction?
It (or Zope 2 development in general, which is becoming indistinguishable
from Five) is going in this direction.
Just an outsider's
Hello guys!
I have a simple question about the design of hierarchical zope product
structures in Zope 2. For example, you have categories, within
categories you have sub-categories, within sub-categories you have
sub-sub categories, within that you have content items, within content
items
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Aeons ago someone promised that said Zope security audit of Python 2.4
was scheduled for October. I've not yet seen any happy announcements
that Zope is now 2.4 compliant, and do want to highlight the importance
of achieving this goal.
Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2005, 17:16 +1100 schrieb Alan Milligan:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
...
With the major distro's, Python is entrenched in their installer and gui
processes and *all* packaging is focused around a single python (2.4 for
everyone excepting our
--On 29. November 2005 17:16:55 +1100 Alan Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Aeons ago someone promised that said Zope security audit of Python 2.4
was scheduled for October. I've not yet seen any happy announcements
that Zope is now 2.4
55 matches
Mail list logo
