trans

Messages by Date

2016/06/04 Re: [Trans] Section 5.1 (Accepting Submissions) revision Peter Bowen
2016/06/04 Re: [Trans] Section 5.1 (Accepting Submissions) revision Paul Wouters
2016/06/04 [Trans] Section 5.1 (Accepting Submissions) revision Peter Bowen
2016/06/03 Re: [Trans] IETF 96 Linus Nordberg
2016/06/03 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Linus Nordberg
2016/06/03 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Linus Nordberg
2016/06/02 [Trans] IETF 96 Melinda Shore
2016/05/31 [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-06 Stephen Kent
2016/05/31 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-06.txt internet-drafts
2016/05/27 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-16.txt internet-drafts
2016/05/26 [Trans] Starting working group last call, draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis Melinda Shore
2016/05/26 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-15.txt internet-drafts
2016/05/24 Re: [Trans] slight timing whoops Stephen Kent
2016/05/20 [Trans] responses to your threat analysis review comments Stephen Kent
2016/05/19 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Linus Nordberg
2016/05/19 Re: [Trans] slight timing whoops Bryan Ford
2016/05/18 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Ben Laurie
2016/05/18 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Linus Nordberg
2016/05/16 [Trans] I'm baaaaack Stephen Kent
2016/05/12 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Linus Nordberg
2016/05/05 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016/05/05 Re: [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Rob Stradling
2016/05/04 [Trans] evaluating an SCT in the absence of the cert's issuer key Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016/04/28 [Trans] trans - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96 "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool"
2016/04/26 Re: [Trans] revised threat analysis doc David A. Cooper
2016/04/26 Re: [Trans] STHExtension expression Rob Stradling
2016/04/26 [Trans] STHExtension expression Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016/04/26 [Trans] IETF 96 planning Melinda Shore
2016/04/14 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-05.txt internet-drafts
2016/04/14 [Trans] slight timing whoops Stephen Kent
2016/04/14 [Trans] revised threat analysis doc Stephen Kent
2016/04/13 Re: [Trans] Proposal: Allow redaction of exactly one DNS-ID Paul Wouters
2016/04/13 Re: [Trans] Proposal: Allow redaction of exactly one DNS-ID Andrew Ayer
2016/04/11 [Trans] Proposal: Allow redaction of exactly one DNS-ID Eran Messeri
2016/04/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
2016/04/11 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-14.txt internet-drafts
2016/04/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
2016/04/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Peter Bowen
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Rob Stradling
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Peter Bowen
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Salz, Rich
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Stephen Kent
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Rob Stradling
2016/04/08 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Rob Stradling
2016/04/07 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Peter Bowen
2016/04/07 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Rick Andrews
2016/04/07 Re: [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Peter Bowen
2016/04/07 [Trans] Issue with redaction and CN-IDs Rick Andrews
2016/04/03 Re: [Trans] [trans] #101 (gossip): Handle Shutdown Log Case trans issue tracker
2016/04/03 Re: [Trans] [trans] #103 (gossip): Evaluate if we need tighter requirements around STHs when we take into account multiple logs. trans issue tracker
2016/04/03 Re: [Trans] [trans] #101 (gossip): Handle Shutdown Log Case trans issue tracker
2016/04/01 Re: [Trans] revisions to Section 3.3 and 3.4 Paul Wouters
2016/04/01 [Trans] revisions to Section 3.3 and 3.4 Stephen Kent
2016/04/01 Re: [Trans] [trans] #124 (rfc6962-bis): introduction needs work trans issue tracker
2016/03/31 [Trans] Fwd: [Crosspost/FYI] Name redaction in CT logs Paul Wouters
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Carl Wallace
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Carl Wallace
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Ben Laurie
2016/03/31 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] Open issues update Salz, Rich
2016/03/30 [Trans] Fwd: Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details Melinda Shore
2016/03/30 [Trans] Open issues update Melinda Shore
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] [trans] #156 (rfc6962-bis): Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? trans issue tracker
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] [trans] #156 (rfc6962-bis): Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? trans issue tracker
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Carl Wallace
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Melinda Shore
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Watson Ladd
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Melinda Shore
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Melinda Shore
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Stephen Kent
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Stephen Kent
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Stephen Kent
2016/03/30 Re: [Trans] [trans] #156 (rfc6962-bis): Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? trans issue tracker
2016/03/29 Re: [Trans] Why "Poison Extension" disappeared in rfc6962-bis? Yusuke OSUMI
2016/03/28 Re: [Trans] Why "Poison Extension" disappeared in rfc6962-bis? Yusuke OSUMI
2016/03/28 Re: [Trans] Why "Poison Extension" disappeared in rfc6962-bis? Yusuke OSUMI
2016/03/28 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Paul Wouters
2016/03/28 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Stephen Kent
2016/03/27 Re: [Trans] Why "Poison Extension" disappeared in rfc6962-bis? Ben Laurie
2016/03/25 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/25 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Paul Wouters
2016/03/25 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Stephen Kent
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Stephen Kent
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #111 (to-be-decided): Consider using the cached-info TLS extension trans issue tracker
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #154 (to-be-decided): CSR extension to convey a certificate subscriber's CT preferences to the CA trans issue tracker
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #154 (rfc6962-bis): CSR extension to convey a certificate subscriber's CT preferences to the CA trans issue tracker
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Paul Wouters
2016/03/24 [Trans] proposed text to address Bryan's concerns Stephen Kent
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem Stephen Kent
2016/03/24 [Trans] updated Section 3.3 Stephen Kent
2016/03/24 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #156 (rfc6962-bis): Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? trans issue tracker
2016/03/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #157 (rfc6962-bis): Conflate Version and TransType trans issue tracker
2016/03/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit description trans issue tracker
2016/03/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit description trans issue tracker
2016/03/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #156 (rfc6962-bis): Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? trans issue tracker
2016/03/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #157 (rfc6962-bis): Conflate Version and TransType trans issue tracker
2016/03/21 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/21 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/21 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-gossip-02.txt internet-drafts
2016/03/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #103 (gossip): Evaluate if we need tighter requirements around STHs when we take into account multiple logs. trans issue tracker
2016/03/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #101 (gossip): Handle Shutdown Log Case trans issue tracker
2016/03/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #157 (rfc6962-bis): Conflate Version and TransType trans issue tracker
2016/03/21 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-13.txt internet-drafts
2016/03/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #157 (rfc6962-bis): Conflate Version and TransType trans issue tracker
2016/03/20 Re: [Trans] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Paul Wouters
2016/03/20 Re: [Trans] [trans] #153 (rfc6962-bis): Finish documenting support for RFC6962 (v1) structures in TransInfo trans issue tracker
2016/03/20 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/20 Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #81 (rfc6962-bis): OIDs and IANA Considerations trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Rob Stradling
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] Co-existence of V1 and V2 embedded SCTs in certificates Rob Stradling
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #111 (rfc6962-bis): Consider using the cached-info TLS extension trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Rob Stradling
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] Co-existence of V1 and V2 embedded SCTs in certificates Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #132 (rfc6962-bis): unclear motivation for and handling of re-logging entries from a frozen log trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit description trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Salz, Rich
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #153 (rfc6962-bis): Finish documenting support for RFC6962 (v1) structures in TransInfo trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Tom Ritter
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #131 (rfc6962-bis): missing guidance for TLS servers to select logs trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 [Trans] revised text for colluding, malicious CAs Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #155 (rfc6962-bis): Describe how to match SCTs to certificates trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #111 (rfc6962-bis): Consider using the cached-info TLS extension trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [draft2] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Stephen Kent
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #153 (rfc6962-bis): Finish documenting support for RFC6962 (v1) structures in TransInfo trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [draft2] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Ben Laurie
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #132 (rfc6962-bis): unclear motivation for and handling of re-logging entries from a frozen log trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 [Trans] [trans] #157 (rfc6962-bis): Conflate Version and TransType trans issue tracker
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] [draft2] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Bryan Ford
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] Co-existence of V1 and V2 embedded SCTs in certificates Eran Messeri
2016/03/19 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #131 (rfc6962-bis): missing guidance for TLS servers to select logs trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [draft2] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Bryan Ford
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #124 (rfc6962-bis): introduction needs work trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #131 (rfc6962-bis): missing guidance for TLS servers to select logs trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #153 (rfc6962-bis): Finish documenting support for RFC6962 (v1) structures in TransInfo trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #134 (rfc6962-bis): client use of logs to detect mis-issued certs trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem Stephen Kent
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #118 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor function description problem trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #156 (rfc6962-bis): Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? trans issue tracker
2016/03/18 Re: [Trans] [draft2] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis (fwd) Ben Laurie
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Rob Stradling
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack David A. Cooper
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Rob Stradling
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Rob Stradling
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/15 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Rob Stradling
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Ben Laurie
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Salz, Rich
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Melinda Shore
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Salz, Rich
2016/03/14 [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack Stephen Kent
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #93 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4 Eran Messeri
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers trans issue tracker
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers trans issue tracker
2016/03/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers trans issue tracker
2016/03/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #57 (rfc6962-bis): Clients MUST NOT match the redaction label with a "*" label trans issue tracker
2016/03/11 [Trans] trans - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 95 "IETF Secretariat"
2016/03/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers Melinda Shore
2016/03/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers Rob Stradling
2016/03/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers Robin Wilton
2016/03/11 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers Rob Stradling
2016/03/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers Stephen Kent
2016/03/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #123 (rfc6962-bis): log clients description too informal, incomplete Stephen Kent
2016/03/10 Re: [Trans] Looking for feedback on open issue Stephen Kent
2016/03/09 Re: [Trans] [trans] #57 (rfc6962-bis): Clients MUST NOT match the redaction label with a "*" label trans issue tracker
2016/03/09 Re: [Trans] [trans] #122 (rfc6962-bis): TLS server requirements Stephen Kent
2016/03/08 Re: [Trans] [trans] #154 (rfc6962-bis): CSR extension to convey a certificate subscriber's CT preferences to the CA trans issue tracker