One needs to have followed this thread closely in order to apprehend the
teachings implicit in the interchanges.

Rose, the way a person experiences another or all others is the way that
that person experiences another or all others. A discussion would only
be a fruitless discursive run around. There would be no cheese at the
end of the maze.

--- In, Rose P <things_r...@...> wrote:
I haven't been following this discussion closely, but this easily roiled
mind you speak of, don't we all have one of those?  Would anyone on the
forum say that they haven't do you think? That would be interesting.

Reply via email to