Michael Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I determine if the cgi_prerun has already been set? If it is set
how would I add my own prerun code to it?
If you're only interested in running your code without trampling on an
existing cgiapp_prerun, you have
... if i only needed MySQL, i'd use SQL Lite.
Really? I think that would be a poor choice and I like SQLite. ; )
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
I am trying out the ValidateRM plugin. I have it working with one form
which is cool.
The second form I have deals with hours worked on a project. The hours
are put in by increments of .25 (i.e. it could be .50 or 7.75). I know I
can check this with the mod ( % ) operator but I haven't a clue
I have a two forms. One on the initial main page and another to input
tasks. The form on the main page gets validated correctly. I use the
same code with the second except the fields to validate and it comes
back with a blank page when I try to validate it.
Any idea looking at this, what the
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 2006-03-02, Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a two forms. One on the initial main page and another to input
tasks. The form on the main page gets validated correctly. I use the
same code with the second except the fields to validate and it comes
back
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 2006-03-02, Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a two forms. One on the initial main page and another to input
tasks. The form on the main page gets validated correctly. I use the
same code with the second except the fields to validate and it comes
back
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Everything from the /head down is gone.
Sounds like something strange happening. The best way to track this down is to
put some debug warn() statements in the code and watch your error log to see
where the output is being chopped up. Specifically
There are lots of people that want to help you, but you have to give
them the tools to do so.
I think I will give up for today...
Give it another try, and send us the actual code. It may just be a
silly little mistake like a typo that just needs another pair of eyes
to spot (you are using
I have all my forms validating. Yay!
The question I have is what happens after validation?
If I create a small form like this that doesn't use my validation stuff:
Form without validation:
form action= method=post
table
trtdUsername:/td
td
select
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I have all my forms validating. Yay!
Congratulations.
The question I have is what happens after validation?
$self-redirect('index.cgi?rm=show_next_page');
Change that to
return $self-show_next_page();
If you do a full redirect
This may be an Apache thing, I don't know.
I have a script to test my ODBC functionality that connects to a db over
an UNC path and a mapped path just fine.
I use that same path in my CGI::Application (both the UNC and mapped
drive and I am getting:
Error executing run mode
Cees Hek wrote:
On 5/21/06, Prakash Inuganti -X (pinugant - Digital-X, Inc. at Cisco)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Thanks. I already have a full blown Application
developed using CAP and H::T. So using Template Toolkit right now is not
an option for me. Now I am adding a page
I was playing around with HTML::Mason to see how it worked. I, of
course, coded some things wrong and Mason through out a very nice
stacktrace/errortrace that showed me the line where I made the error.
I asked and found that Mason has a helper module called
HTML::Mason::Exceptions that that
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I was playing around with HTML::Mason to see how it worked. I, of
course, coded some things wrong and Mason through out a very nice
stacktrace/errortrace that showed me the line where I made the error.
I asked and found that Mason has a helper module
Forgive my ignorance but where exactly do this go:
$ENV{CGI_APP_DEBUG}
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
I've started on porting CGI::Application to Perl6.
The current state is that I've made a number of code adjustments, but
the module still doesn't compile. I haven't started converting any of
the tests.
I don't think the replacement for Class::ISA is even implemented
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Michael Peters wrote:
I think we should drop 'CGI' from the name. It has a very negative
connotation
with some people. They think that CGI scripts are 1990's web even
though almost
all dynamic web sites operate over the CGI protocol.
Web::Application? Web::App ?
I
Cees Hek wrote:
Let's call it møøse!!!
Oh wait, that one is taken already.
How about døtCGI!!!
Nope, no good.
How about Cøtølyst!!!
This is tougher than I thought :)
Seriously though, I think a cool name would be a good thing. But I
generally come up with really crap names so I will leave
Chico wrote:
OK, I am relitively new to scripting with PERL and I
am extremely new to web development with PERL and the
modules or frameworks. So what I am trying to do is
give you a new persons perspective.
It is Perl when describing the language and perl when talking about
the interpreter.
Mark Stosberg wrote:
snip
I think you want to use the dependency feature, which can make
task_names required when project_names = 'Help Desk'.
See the docs for examples and details.
I always forget to look at the module docs that the plugin for this
depends on:
dependencies = {
Sam Tregar wrote:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Mark Stosberg wrote:
- Storing photos in PostgreSQL for easy deployment on load-balanced
web servers. (So far, that's worked surprising well)
That is surprising! Why would you do that instead of using NFS?
I am curious about that as well...
Robert
Michael Peters wrote:
The uploaded file
CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.01.tar.gz
I am just curious as I like C::A and am using it at work. What
differentiates a module using the CGI-Application- name versus the
CGI-Application-Plugin- namespace?
Robert
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I am just curious as I like C::A and am using it at work. What
differentiates a module using the CGI-Application- name versus the
CGI-Application-Plugin- namespace?
Plugins are used from within a CGI::Application module. Dispatch sits outside of
all
I have the following in my validation script:
return {
required = [
qw/user_name clin_id charge_ids project_names start_date
end_date total_hours/
],
require_some = { task_or_add_task = [ 1, qw/task_names
add_task/ ] },
dependencies = {
I would like to populate one combo box with data when the user chooses
an option from another combo box.
I am currently using CA and HT only and would like to keep it that way
if possible.
If that answer is Javascript that is okay...I would rather it not. ; )
Robert
I would like to move one of my sites to TT from HTML::Template. It
uses the ValidateRM module currently because the pod examples are in HT.
Is there somewhere that shows how to do that?
Robert
-
Web Archive:
Sean Davis wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I would like to populate one combo box with data when the user chooses
an option from another combo box.
I am currently using CA and HT only and would like to keep it that way
if possible.
If that answer is Javascript that is okay...I would rather
Let's say you've got two lists, and a selection in list A narrows down
choices in list B. An app I work on knows list A and list b and the
relation between items in both. So, we could use CGI::App and H::T to
populate both JS arrays and send that as part of the form. Then, a JS
function
Dan Horne wrote:
All you'd need to do is replace the HT parameters in your templates with TT
syntax. You should also look at C::A::Plugin::AnyTemplate if you don't want
to change the invocation of your templates by your Perl code
I can probably get most of that. However I have small
Dan Horne wrote:
On Behalf Of Robert Hicks
Sent: Thursday, 12 October 2006 3:00 a.m.
To: cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net
Subject: [cgiapp] Re: HTML::Template - TT
Dan Horne wrote:
All you'd need to do is replace the HT parameters in your templates with
TT
syntax. You should also look at C
Sean Davis wrote:
On Thursday 12 October 2006 09:01, Robert Hicks wrote:
I know this is sad.
What is the term I should be looking for when I want to bring back only
the associated records with a drop down selection?
I assume you mean What AJAX command do I use?. That depends
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
The span class=errors shows up as does the 'Invalid' or 'Missing'
message. However, the CSS is not picking up.
If your resulting HTML has that span tag like your showing us, then it's not a
ValidateRM thing.
I have this in my site.css file (just
I have a form with option boxes.
select name=user
option value=1Bob/name
When I do a $user = $result-valid('user'):
#1 Is what getting passed back the value (i.e. 1) or Bob?
#2 When I do a constraint on that is it on the value (i.e. 1) or Bob?
The value in this case is the (id) field in the
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
select name=user
option value=1Bob/name
When I do a $user = $result-valid('user'):
#1 Is what getting passed back the value (i.e. 1) or Bob?
#2 When I do a constraint on that is it on the value (i.e. 1) or Bob?
D::FV just validates what the web
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
select name=user
option value=1Bob/name
When I do a $user = $result-valid('user'):
#1 Is what getting passed back the value (i.e. 1) or Bob?
#2 When I do a constraint on that is it on the value (i.e. 1) or Bob?
D::FV just validates what the web
Thanks to FF I get the following:
user_name=2clin_id=1charge_ids=1project_names=3task_names=add_task=Star+Treksubtask_names=start_date=10%2F19%2F2006end_date=total_hours=.25rm=taskform
In my code I take the add_task above and put it in a variable like so:
my $new_task_name =
Mike Friedman wrote:
On 10/19/06, Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if ($new_task_name) {
$sth1-$self-dbh-prepare(
That should be:
if ($new_task_name) {
my $sth1 = $self-dbh-prepare( ...
As you have it, you're trying to use the strinigified version of $self
Maybe someone with experience could update the CA site with an example
or two of doing this with CA?
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
Michael Peters wrote:
Well, the solution is simple, but maybe not what you want to hear. Don't use
CGI::Ajax. I've never used it and have never missed it. Just put the necessary
Javascript into your templates.
I just started using JQuery on Friday. It is really nice. I think CA
spoils you
Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
So now I use 2 frameworks that support plugins; CA and JQuery. :)
Hey, HTML::Template::Pluggable supports plugins too, you know ;)
Rhesa
Okay but I don't use HTML::Template. I use TT. : )
Oh, so I guess that is 3 things now.
Robert
Rana Banerjee wrote:
Mark,
Why don't you publish the renumeration offered. 10 cents ~ 30 cents ~
million bucks whatever.
if you prefer a junior guy do senior work but only get appriciated like a
junior guyput that in quotes.
~rana
I asked because it sounded like they had a variety of
Do I need to do anything to my CA web application to make it run under
FCGI instead of CGI? I have the FastCGI DLL loaded in my Apache instance
and I have registered .fgci to be served by it.
Can I just rename my index.cgi to index.fcgi and away I go? I am just
curious to see if FCGI will
Dan Horne wrote:
You'll need to need to put your code in a while loop (untested as I use
CGI::Application::Dispatch, but it should give you the right idea):
use WebApp;
use CGI::Fast();
while (my $q = new CGI::Fast) {
my $webapp = WebApp-new(QUERY = $q);
$webapp-run();
}
With the first
I was wondering if anyone is either working on a Log4perl plugin or is
currently using it in CA with a simple pre-run wrapper.
I tried a couple ways but am not quite getting it:
# this one is in cgiapp_prerun
Log::Log4perl::init( $self-cfg('logger_conf') );
$self-param( 'logger' )
Dan Horne wrote:
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Hicks
Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 8:38 a.m.
To: cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net
Subject: [cgiapp] Anyone using Log4perl?
I was wondering if anyone is either working on a Log4perl plugin or is
currently using it in CA
Ron Savage wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:37:34 -0500, Robert Hicks wrote:
Hi Robert
I was wondering if anyone is either working on a Log4perl plugin or
is currently using it in CA with a simple pre-run wrapper.
Why not just use CGI::Application::Plugin::LogDispatch? It works perfectly.
I
Chris Drake wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a way to specify that a connection should use the Oracle
shared server feature? I'm only getting a max of a hundred or so
connections, each kicking off it's own oracle process to handle it:
unless I'm mistaken, a new process means it's *not* a shared
Chris Drake wrote:
Hi Philip Robert,
Thanks for those excellent references help offers. Do you (or
anyone) know whether or not I should even be *using* a shared server,
and have you any idea about how many dedicated connections is too
many on a dual-3.8ghz Xeon Linux PC with 8gigs or RAM
I heard there was only 1 Perl team. Sad. I wonder if the location is a
major cause of this though.
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
Viacheslav Sheveliov wrote:
Let's don't write plugins for every H:T-style module! Setting something
like:
$self -{__CURRENT_TMPL_MODULE} = 'HTML::Template::Compiled';
in your App will do all the job .
I would vote not doing this in CGI::Application itself. I'd
I am being contracted for a small site for a friend. It is maybe 5-7
pages and probably 1 form and some AJAX sprinkled in.
While I really love CA (I use it at work) I am wondering if this is too
small to use Perl/CGI/CA for?
Thoughts?
Robert
Thank you for your replies.
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Bruce McKenzie wrote:
OK, so I'm way behind the rest of the world when it comes to XML -- but
I am using CGI::Application -- so how hard could it be to catch up? :-)
What I want to do is return XML (as an Ajax response) to the jQuery
Interface library Autocomplete plugin.
In the plugin
I am just coming up to speed on this one.
I am wondering if I am reading the pod right.
Am I replacing use base 'CGI::Application' with use base
'CGI::Application::Dispatch'?
Then if my module name is package Abrams I would build a dispatch
table for my runmodes:
sub dispatch_ars {
I have about a 5 page site. I have it going in TT since that is what I
normally use. I got to thinking about whether HT was faster since it is
just a templating system.
Has anyone ever done a comparison?
Robert
-
Web
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Robert
I have about a 5 page site. I have it going in TT since that is what I
normally use. I got to thinking about whether HT was faster since it is
just a templating system.
Well, TT is very clever, and /very/ complex, so it'd usually be slower.
OTOH, on each
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Robert
So then it really comes down to a taste test. : )
Right. And to my taste HT is the one to swallow, with TT the one to spit out.
If you care to elaborate I would like to know why?
Robert
-
Sam Tregar wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Ron Savage wrote:
OTOH, on each invocation of your CGI script, you're probable only calling
HT or TT once to render one page, right? Perhaps best to just not worry
about it :-).
All too true. But, if you decide to worry about it anyway be sure to
try
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Robert
Right. And to my taste HT is the one to swallow, with TT the one to spit
out.
If you care to elaborate I would like to know why?
HT is HTML::Template
TT is The Template Toolkit
Firstly, my choice was a decision taken years ago. It may well be
different if taken
I want to turn:
loop_context_vars = 1
die_on_bad_params= 0
ON, for all templates.
Can I put something in the cgiapp_prerun that does this?
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I want to turn:
loop_context_vars = 1
die_on_bad_params= 0
ON, for all templates.
Can I put something in the cgiapp_prerun that does this?
Yes. See the docs for The load_tmpl() callback.
It allows you to do just that.
Mark
Thanks Mark, I
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I want to turn:
loop_context_vars = 1
die_on_bad_params= 0
ON, for all templates.
Can I put something in the cgiapp_prerun that does this?
Yes. See the docs for The load_tmpl() callback.
It allows you to do just that.
Mark
In reading
Michael Peters wrote:
Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
IMHO, that would be XML::Simple. It's a bit tricky to force XML::Simple
to generate the exact same output, but it depends a lot on the context
if you need it.
I've normally used XML::Simple in the past, but it's not really that simple.
I've just
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Do I simple add to my instance script:
use AbramsRest::Dispatch;
AbramsRest::Dispatch-dispatch();
No, that doesn't get added to your instance script, it becomes your instance
script. Dispatch was designed to replace multiple instance scripts
I currently have:
use lib qw( lib/ ); # all my modules are under here
I have been told elsewhere that that is bad form and a full path should
be used there instead of a relative one.
I currently use Cwd to tell me what my path is so that I can load the
appropriate config file. If I hard
my $webapp = AbramsRest-new(
PARAMS = {
die_on_bad_params = 0,
loop_context_vars = 1,
global_vars = 1,
}
);
I have that in my instance script. I am trying to pass those params to
all the HT templates.
I know that CA has a callback for load_tmpl and I was
Is it dangerous to pass relative paths to things instead of full paths?
For example within my web app I have logging and I tell it where to log
by 'logs/logname.log' and not '/home/public/logs/logname.log'. I also
have my personal lib as:
'use lib qw( lib/ );'
and not:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I want to turn:
loop_context_vars = 1
die_on_bad_params= 0
ON, for all templates.
Can I put something in the cgiapp_prerun that does this?
Yes. See the docs for The load_tmpl() callback.
It allows you to do just that.
Is this sufficient
I ended up just creating some SetEnv variables and that is working peachy.
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe,
Ron Savage wrote:
Class::DBI?
You mean Rose, right?
Hint: The correct answer is: Yes! I mean Rose.
That isn't the first time I have seen something said like that and in
other Perl groups. Is that where the wind is blowing now days?
Robert
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Pascal
And the first time for me. Well, everytime I promise myself to learn some
OO
mapper a new one comes along, from DBIx::Class to Ruby's ActiveRecord to
Class::DBI to this. Am I too slow, or too behind the times, or just never
need one in the first place? :-)
I guess
I would be interested in seeing how many use TT vs HT.
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
I would be interested in seeing how many use TT vs HT.
I use both. Sometimes I prefer TT.
When would you prefer TT?
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp
Scott R. Prelewicz wrote:
HT 75%, TT 25% depending on the app.
Scott R. Prelewicz
Noein Incorporated
1517 Kenmore Ave.
Kenmore, NY 14227
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
716-867-7063
What would be the push to use TT over HT?
Robert
-
Web
Jason Purdy wrote:
I added the votes up and also surveyed the #cgiapp folks:
HT: 7 (Karen, Renee, Ed, Joel, John, Jason, CromeDome)
TT: 4 (Adrian, Dan, Barry, hide)
Both: 2 (mpeters, Scott)
I'm a HT guy, myself. I like how it doesn't have a lot of the
functionality support of TT and that
There are 2 new ones:
Advanced HTML::Template: Widgets
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2007/02/02/htmltemplate-widgets.html
Advanced HTML::Template: Filters
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2006/11/30/html-template-filters.html
They are just some quick articles but (being new to HT) I found them
I have a couple small sites up that look fine in FF and Safari, have a
couple of quirks with IE6 and are zonked with IE7. I usually code my
HTML to XHTML standards. These quirks have me looking around and what
breaks in IE regarding CSS stuff.
Seems kind of off topic but I want to know in
I have never done a callback before so I used GOOGLE to search for a way
to get some globals setup for my webapp.
I tried the following thinking it would override the current load_tmpl:
sub load_tmpl {
my ($self, $tmpl_file, @extra_params) = @_;
# die_on_bad_params goes to 0 in
Thank you both very much. Teach a man to fish...
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SWITCH tag is another great thing. Sometimes it is too long winded
to do the switch on the Perl side...
I wish HT had that one...
I like HTC as it is lightweigth but has the features I need. I've never
tried to use TT, but it seems to be too heavy for a very
Mark Stosberg wrote:
[snip]
I used TT for one project for offline template generation, using the
'ttree' tool. It was very nice for that-- it worked as a standalone
application without the need to learn or use any Perl
I think that is a big benefit of getting to know TT, it is useful for
If I create a filter for HT do I have to pass it in a certain way?
sub doc_filter {
my $text_ref = shift;
$$text_ref =~ s|doc.*?/doc||gx;
}
I thought I was supposed to pass it here:
my $tpl = $self-load_tmpl( 'home.tpl', filter = \doc_filter );
But that doesn't seem to have done the
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Folks
This is a copy of an email I sent directly to Robert rather than via the
list.
Hi Robert
In HT only you call it directly:
my $tpl = HTML::Template-new( filename = 'home.tpl',
filter = \doc_filter );
In CA you call that
Do you tend to make your module names generic like Site or Webapp? I
am doing a couple small sites and I am creating secondary modules to
hold things.
I have something like:
Site.pm
Site::Actions.pm
Site::Validators.pm
Site::SQL.pm
Is that good? Or would you replace Site with someting?
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Do you tend to make your module names generic like Site or Webapp? I
am doing a couple small sites and I am creating secondary modules to
hold things.
I have something like:
Site.pm
Site::Actions.pm
Site::Validators.pm
Site::SQL.pm
Is that good
Never mind that last comment; I see what you mean now.
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Christopher Little wrote:
Your syntax for the filter is correct and your sub doc_filter should
work.
Can you provide a little more code and the error message you're getting?
I agree with Christopher. Find the spot in the load_tmpl
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Christopher Little wrote:
Your syntax for the filter is correct and your sub doc_filter should
work.
Can you provide a little more code and the error message you're
getting?
I agree
Am I right in that you still have to do some rewrite Apache rules?
Robert
-
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiappr=1w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
Am I right in that you still have to do some rewrite Apache rules?
Depends on what you want to do. I run Dispatch as an Apache mod_perl handler and
don't need any rewrite rules. If you don't do that, but instead have a normal
.cgi script and want
Jason Purdy wrote:
This is probably going to start a firestorm, but it's important to have
an opposing view voiced so no one thinks MIME::Lite is fit to be tarred
feathered.
I use it and have had no problems with it. I have used Mail::Sender as
well with good effect.
Robert
My question would be that MIME::Lite gives me everything I need in one
interface and it was easy to use. What would I need to use to:
- send email
- send email with attachments
ML does both of those for me in a relatively easy way. If you have
something better, I don't mind using it as long
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-20 04:50]:
I am a big fan of HTML::Template, which is why I put in there
in the first place. In spite of the fact that I have a strong
preference, I made it easy (nay, trivial) to swap in your own
templating system.
Your request
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 03:40]:
Plus, how many Mason-only or TT-only modules are there out
there? More than there are H::T-only modules, right? You can
hardly begrudge us H::T users *our* occasional exclusives, can
you?
Personally, I’m not picking sides. I
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-21 21:10]:
I have only seen you post things you don't like.
Heh. So it goes.
So, what would you use?
Well, as I said, both Mason and Petal have things that
immediately put me off – but I’ve yet to use them in anger.
So I don’t
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-22 20:35]:
http://www.fs-output.com/trac/wiki/Nenshi
Is that you then?
Whoa! No, I had not seen that. I’ll have to take a look and see
if our ideas about the design agree sufficiently.
Thanks for the link!
Regards,
No problem
I have a simple site:
www.skylinebaptist.us
IE for some reason cannot navigate to:
http://www.skylinebaptist.us/index.cgi?rm=ministries
Firefox has no problem at all. Any idea why IE barfs (besides IE is crap)?
Robert
# CGI::Application community mailing list
##
on
the opening tag for the title.
Kevin
- Original Message - From: Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# CGI::Application community mailing list
####
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options
Karen wrote:
On 1/1/08, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert,
I believe the page is not being rendered because of a missing bracket on the
opening tag for the title.
Good catch. Robert, you might want to try validating pages, like so:
Michael Peters wrote:
Robert Hicks wrote:
You are right *but* the code for that comes from:
title[% webpage_title %]/title
This probably isn't your problem, but all input that goes in your templates
should be HTML escaped unless you know it has been earlier. TT makes this very
easy
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
