Hi ...
In another. The only difference I see is the
systemd-udev-settle.service, do you have it enabled it? What systemd-*
services do you have enabled? I have:
aztlan ~ # find /etc/systemd/system -name "systemd-*" -type l
/etc/systemd/system/network-online.target.wants/systemd-net
in PID1 or init. Let those 'features' be
handled by their own specialists.
Almost all the features of systemd live outside of PID 1.
You know, the unix way. Do one thing, do it well.
This is from my desktop machine:
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-reply-password
/usr/lib/systemd/ntp-units.d
/usr/lib
fixes. Life goes on.
And you don't want complexity in PID1 or init. Let those 'features' be
handled by their own specialists.
Almost all the features of systemd live outside of PID 1.
You know, the unix way. Do one thing, do it well.
This is from my desktop machine:
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd
complexity.
Yeah, like the kernel.
Complexity means bugs.
Bugs get reported, bugs get fixes. Life goes on.
You didn't answered this, did you?
And you don't want complexity in PID1 or init. Let those 'features' be
handled by their own specialists.
Almost all the features of systemd live outside
I have in
USE="gnome -qt4 -hal -arts -berkdb X qtk -qt3 -kde dvd alsa cdr cups apache2
ssl foomaticdb ppds mysql -acl \
java tiff png usb scanner gimp gimpprint cgi fam nptl truetype kpathsea type1
opengl tetex spell consolekit dbus policykit -systemd"
But some application manag
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Heiko Baums <li...@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
> Just to be absolutely sure put this line into
> your /etc/portage/make.conf, too:
> INSTALL_MASK="/lib/systemd /lib32/systemd /lib64/systemd /usr/lib/systemd
> /usr/lib32/systemd /usr/lib64/s
I'm getting these at startup:
systemd[1]: File /lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service:33
configures an IP firewall (IPAddressDeny=any), but the local system does
not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling.
systemd[1]: Proceeding WITHOUT firewalling in effect!
systemd[1]: File /lib/systemd
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:21 PM Tamer Higazi wrote:
[...]
> Sep 07 22:15:19 tux systemd[1]: Starting Network Configuration...
> Sep 07 22:15:19 tux systemd-networkd[958]: lo: Link UP
> Sep 07 22:15:19 tux systemd-networkd[958]: lo: Gained carrier
> Sep 07 22:15:19 tux systemd-
Am 06.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb Jc García:
OpenRC is there on the stage3, systemd isn't, if you don't think about
systemd you get an OpenRC installation, I think it would confuse more
people to talk about choosing init system(especially noobs) right at
the beginning of the handbook.
To get
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev.
I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of the
next dependency tree:
banshee
- gnome-base/gnome-settings
I run a stable system using gnome3 and hence systemd, specifically
systemd-236-r5. My bootloader is grub2. I do *not* have an EFI
platform and do *not* have an initramfs.
I do *not* have a separate /usr filesystem.
The news item says that, in preparation for the 237 release and the
likely
tex spell consolekit dbus policykit -systemd"
>
> But some application managed to pull it IN.
> How to fix this blockage?
>
>
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration
> ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration" is blocking sys-fs/udev-225-r1)
> [b
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
though, ready to take over the world the next time you aren't looking :-)
Ha! I can already
Am 08.08.2015 um 19:05 schrieb walt:
I just noticed that net-misc/netifrc installs two systemd service files,
which puzzled me. Is this in preparation for virtualizing openrc?
This is to provide systemd users with the corresponding service files
like OpenRC users get the necessary init scripts
On 9/5/21 12:46 AM, Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> After upgrading my gentoo box i see a new behavior, that my machine
> after boot doen't configure my network. My network is configured through
> systemd-network,
>
> Only if I manually after login execute: "s
On 03/21/2015 02:46 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
They are; basically everything nowadays is systemd aware. Even OpenRC
can now use some of its configurations.
Could you run this immediately after booting:
systemd-delta
I've finally gotten around to doing
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:22:13 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I use NetworkManager for wireless connections, and systemd-networkd for
static ethernet, so I don't use wpa_supplicant directly. However, I
would suggest to simply enable
wpa_supplicant@your-wireless-device.service.
I have it set
wabe gmail.com> writes:
> waltdnes waltdnes.org wrote:
> I'm glad that gentoo users still have an alternative to systemd, and
> hope that this will also be the case in future.
Non Systemd has a very bright future. In clustering, Systemd is ok, even
great for containers. In Hi
Hi!
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:14:07 +0100 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have systemd and openrc installed on my system, but I use openrc for
> booting.
> Upto systemd-239 this works just fine.
> But with systemd-240 my system doesn't load necessary kernel modules
> li
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 10:45:38 +, Michael wrote:
> Given M.Orlitzky's comments and discussions with systemd devs he
> shared, what's the optimal solution for OpenRC users, who want to avoid
> systemd?
systemd-tmpfiles != systemd. Despite the claims that systemd is
m
On 09/17/14 20:36, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
[snip]
It's an interesting read; I highly recommend it.
[1]
http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/open-source/65402-torvalds-says-he-has-no-strong-opinions-on-systemd
Now you use this to advertise for systemd?
Systemd fanbois are becoming
Hi
systemd-249.6-r1 conflicts with sys-apps/hwids[udev]
But when I remove the udev use flag,
emerge sys-apps/hwids gives
The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
systemd? ( udev )
So, I would have to remove sys-apps/systemd-249.6 first.
Is it save to
emerge -C sys
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > emerge -uDtvp world reveals the same trouble::
> >
> > [ebuild R] sys-apps/dbus-1.8.16::gentoo USE="X systemd* -debug
> > -doc (-selinux) -static-libs {-test}" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB
Hi people,
After upgrading my gentoo box i see a new behavior, that my machine
after boot doen't configure my network. My network is configured through
systemd-network,
Only if I manually after login execute: "systemctl restart
systemd-network" it gets configured.
Can somebody t
(I am assuming that you are using systemd-186 -- all earlier releases
I checked have bugs I ran into)
If it's right after logging in, then I would suspect some PAM
deficiency. I wrote a bit about this on G+ yesterday:
For anyone battling the trifecta of PAM, systemd and gnome on Gentoo,
take note
Eliezer Croitoru writes:
i want to try this systemd thingy, where do is start at?
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Systemd
Wonko
On 31/07/13 18:26, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages will install systemd unit files in /urs/lib
Am 09.08.2013 07:19, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
2.02.99-r1 has it's own upstream systemd files in ~arch now (they are
different from what the systemd-love overlay has, AFAIK)
$ qlist lvm2 |grep systemd
/usr/lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket
/usr/lib/systemd/system/dm-event.service
/usr/lib
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
Thanks for some hints,
Helmut
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
INSTALL_MASK=/lib/systemd /lib32/systemd /lib64/systemd
/usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib32/systemd /usr/lib64/systemd /etc/systemd
Warning to the reader: Please do not copy/paste this particular
INSTALL_MASK setting. It may work
Am 17.08.2011 18:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
sshd.service gets started at boot, network.service not ...
I linked multi-user.target to /etc/systemd/system/default.target,
didn't help.
Do I need that link?
Solved, but dunno if done correctly.
ln -sf /etc/systemd/system
On 08/30/2017 04:39 PM, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, glad i was offline for
> that. however, in my case i'd really like to avoid systemd. can i
> setup with out systemd, or do i need to remove and patch later.
If y
kool, i can do that. thanks.
--
The Power Of the People Is Stronger Than The People In Charge.
30. Aug 2017 14:54 by m...@gentoo.org:
> On 08/30/2017 04:39 PM, > mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com> wrote:
>> I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, gla
Am 20.11.18 um 11:19 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:49:27 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>>> What version does "qlist ICv systemd" show?
>>
>> No version, just a long list of files.
>
> That should have been "qlist -ICv syst
Hi,
I have systemd and openrc installed on my system, but I use openrc for
booting.
Upto systemd-239 this works just fine.
But with systemd-240 my system doesn't load necessary kernel modules
like DRM AMDGPU modules.
This break Xorg :
(EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
Has
/consolekit
Dependency of gnome-control-center:
|| ( ( app-admin/openrc-settingsd sys-auth/consolekit )
=sys-apps/systemd-31 )
gnome-base/gnome-session-3.8.2.1-r1 requires sys-auth/consolekit
gnome-session:
systemd? ( =sys-apps/systemd-183 )
!systemd? ( sys-auth
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
.., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components
On 06/14/14 23:39, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[snip]
It means that openrc users should strongly consider migrate to eudev.
I use eudev since its beta and never had any issue, nor systemd
leaking into my system. And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/14 23:39, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[snip]
It means that openrc users should strongly consider migrate to eudev.
I use eudev since its beta and never had any issue, nor systemd
leaking into my system. And in addition add
There is no such kernel option.
On 28/10/17 21:21, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Do you have CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF enabled?
Regards.
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com
<mailto:rea...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm getting these at startup:
systemd[1
I added the override because of that problem.
I removed the override:
tux /home/tamer # systemctl revert systemd-networkd
Removed /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service.d/override.conf.
Removed /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service.d.
tux /home/tamer #
tux /home/tamer # systemctl
Greetings fellow Gentooistas,
I am looking for input on how to speed up my boot process with systemd
on Gentoo.
First of one word to systemd: Gentoo is about choice, and I choose to
take a deeper look into systemd out of curiosity, so please respect that
and don't turn it into another kind
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 16:09 +0200, Hogren wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Very simple question but did you have "pam" in your global USE flag
> or
> Systemd USE flag ?
Yes, I am using the gnome/systemd profile:
# euse -I pam
global
On 09/08/13 01:59, walt wrote:
On 08/07/2013 06:17 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
And in particular, all the GNOME stack includes their necessary unit files.
That's good to know. The only reason I haven't already made the switch to
systemd is lvm2 -- I just couldn't puzzle out how to get
I've been struggling with today's update of systemd on ~arch because the
ebuild keeps accusing me of using a compatibility symlink to run systemd
during bootup.
Yes, guilty as charged, I told grub2 to use /usr/bin/systemd as 'init', when
/usr/bin/systemd has been, until now, a symlink to /usr/lib
On Tue, Feb 18 2014, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 17/02/14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It depends; right now you can't switch back and forth between OpenRC
and systemd without reemerging some stuff.
Interesting
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 12:18:09 Rich Freeman wrote:
That would be udev. It has been around long before systemd, and you
must have missed the huge flamewar when they renamed it to
systemd-udevd. Maybe we'll see java renamed to
java-by-oracle-with-ask-toolbar next. :)
TBH I wouldn't
Dale wrote:
>
> root@fireball / # equery d sys-apps/systemd-utils
> * These packages depend on sys-apps/systemd-utils:
> sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles-250 (sys-apps/systemd-utils[tmpfiles])
> sys-fs/udev-250 (sys-apps/systemd-utils[udev,...])
> virtual/libudev-232-r7 (!systemd
:
|| ( ( app-admin/openrc-settingsd sys-auth/consolekit )
=sys-apps/systemd-31 )
gnome-base/gnome-session-3.8.2.1-r1 requires sys-auth/consolekit
gnome-session:
systemd? ( =sys-apps/systemd-183 )
!systemd? ( sys-auth/consolekit )
gnome-base/gnome-shell-3.8.3-r1 requires sys-auth
I have in make.conf USE: ... -systemd
But gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon wants to pull in systemd-208
so I need to emerge sys-apps/systemd-208-r2 and I have installed udev which
conflicts with systemd.
Do I need to unmerge udev and emerge systemd. I'm not planning on switching to systemd
tual terminal (e.g. Ctrl+Alt+F2),
> > log in and execute the command:
> >
> > loginctl unlock-sessions
> >
> > ...
> >
> > If this is a default Gentoo installation with openrc, why does a default
> > plasma desktop screenlocker comes up with this nonsense?
Am 20.11.18 um 10:19 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:14:01 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>>>> upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
>>>>
>>>> the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files
>>>&g
On 2013-07-31 8:22 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:34:22 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Where is this 'INSTALL_MASK' option for opting out of systemd
completely documented?
man make.conf
Thanks but... I didn't see one word mention of systemd.
So, how should
Am 25.09.2013 01:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long.
systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have.
Thanks ... I cleaned up some cruft already and will test some
boot-process soon. Still on the road ...
For example, during bootup, systemd said that swap.target failed, but in
fact swap was working normally when I logged in, and systemctl status
swap.target showed no error messages.
systemd also warned that lvm.service failed, but in fact the lvm drive
was mounted and working as expected after I
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way systemd works. I have a problem with mounting USB sick
(it mounts as root:root) and I can not even change the permission.
I am receiving Hylafax fax transmission reports (email) on all incoming faxes and now these emails are empty
Aside from all the discussions around systemd, I simply gave the new
systemd-networkd a try.
It helped me to simplify my config for my main machine where I run KVM
for virtualization and need a network bridge:
http://www.oops.co.at/en/publications/systemd-networkd-network-configuration
Am 16.05.2014 16:00, schrieb Jc García:
The same again you are mistyping systemd, is
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd read carefully what you copy, and verify
always those paths really exist. If you had done this, you would have
noticed /usr/lib/system/system doesn't exist at all.
( Ah, I only
On 6/3/2014 11:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more
infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item everytime
it happens is unrealistic?
Weren't you the one saying that those of us who were
non-systemd users are recommended to choose between:
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace 'sys-power/upower-pm-utils'
or
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace '=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
However, all systemd users are recommended to stay with
sys-power/upower.
I first read stay with sys-power
Am 17.09.2014 20:36, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
Now you use this to advertise for systemd?
Systemd fanbois are becoming more and more desperate.
Gentoo is still all about choice, right? And we still have that choice.
If you dislike Systemd, then just don't use it. Period.
Contrary
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 02:16:24 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
And with systemd, rebooting to a new kernel takes just a few seconds ;)
And here I was thinking that the pro-systemd crowd doesn't care about the
boot-time of systemd?
(See the [OT} Linus Torvalds on systemd thread around 18
On 11/30/2014 05:13 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
systemd isn't monolithic so I can only assume you are referring to the
Linux kernel here :)
systemd most certainly is monolithic as well as modular. You can't run
journald without systemd and you most certainly can't replace journald
with a third
Am 08.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Rich Freeman:
Udev installs into such a path, and currently does not depend on
systemd (in fact, they block each other).
They block each other because udev is part of systemd. So if you install
systemd you already have udev and don't need the separate udev package
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Jonathan Callen <jcal...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The python USE flag has been removed
> from newer stable versions of sys-apps/systemd (in favor of
> dev-python/python-systemd), but dev-python/python-systemd is not yet
> stable.
Thanks for catching
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:23 AM, J. <jyo.gar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> SYSTEMD_INIT_PID=`pgrep -o -U 0 systemd`
Doesn't systemd call "init" rather "systemd" if you use the "sysv-utils" flag?
Do you have CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF enabled?
Regards.
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm getting these at startup:
>
> systemd[1]: File /lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service:33
> configures an IP firewall (IPAddressDeny=any), bu
On Wed, Feb 07 2018, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:28 PM, allan gottlieb <gottl...@nyu.edu> wrote:
>> I run a stable system using gnome3 and hence systemd, specifically
>> systemd-236-r5. My bootloader is grub2. I do *not* have an EFI
>> platform and
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:28 PM, allan gottlieb <gottl...@nyu.edu> wrote:
> I run a stable system using gnome3 and hence systemd, specifically
> systemd-236-r5. My bootloader is grub2. I do *not* have an EFI
> platform and do *not* have an initramfs.
> I do *not* have a separa
Happened on 2/2 systems tested. You can bring the interface up manually if
you're at the console.
Error looks like
systemd-networkd[252]: enp5s0: Could not bring up interface: Invalid
argument
Looks like its fixed in git
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12784
[Unit]
After=systemd-udev-settle.service
Am 9/7/21 um 8:45 PM schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
cat /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service.d/override.conf
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2022 14:54:50 -00 Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Can't you just fix your USE flags with systemd-utils? Why revert?
>
> No, because the flag I'd need is 'boot', and that triggers switching from
> elogind to systemd.
No, USE=bo
Canek Peláez Valdés caneko at gmail.com writes:
Hi; I've been running systemd in Gentoo since September from 2010, and
it works great for me: all my machines run it at this point.
Well, I'm curious.
How well does systemd work with uClibc based systems? More
specifically does systemd work
Hello all,
I installed gnome3 few weeks ago, and had to migrate to systemd.
The network init scripts are working fine. But I am not sure how to
restart a specific interface.
For example in the past I used to do:
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart
The wlan0 starts through wpa_supplicant under openrc
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:24:05 -0500, Tanstaafl
tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, before I go and open up a bug requesting this...
I know there have to be a lot of people on this list who can answer
this question...
Is making the use of systemd or not based on a selected
On 21.02.2014 08:42, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
So all talks about systemd being modular are nothing more than
nonsense. Guess what will happen on segfault in libsystemd.so?
Segfaults in pid 1 are so nice to bear...
And now with 209 there is a new systemd-networkd deamon that is started
is seriously wrong with systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service; why
it takes 1:07 minutes to run? Do you have /tmp as a tmpfs?
Yes, at least according to mount, it is.
mount | grep tmpfs
devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs
(rw,relatime,size=238864k,nr_inodes=59716,mode=755)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:54:31 -0400, Jonathan Callen wrote:
The Gummiboot project is no longer maintained, it has been merged into
systemd as systemd-boot (note that using any other part of Systemd
should *not* be required to use systemd-boot, but I don't know for
sure because I do not have
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> James, the guidance has already been given. Can you please grep for systemd
> ALL of your /etc/portage? There seems to be a USE flag set somewhere and
this
> is what is pulling in dbus *with* systemd.
YES. I forgot Neil had told me to periodically remo
On 30/08/17 23:39, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, glad i was offline for
that. however, in my case i'd really like to avoid systemd. can i
setup with out systemd, or do i need to remove and patch later.
As others mentioned, openrc
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:33:03 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >>> What version does "qlist ICv systemd" show?
> >>
> >> No version, just a long list of files.
> >
> > That should have been "qlist -ICv systemd"
>
>
Hi. After the latest update to systemd 246, I get periodic messages
like these:
systemd[7985]: Not generating service for XDG autostart
app-nm\x2dapplet-autostart.service, it is hidden.
systemd[7985]: Not generating service for XDG autostart
app-org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.XSettings
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 16:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> Hi
> systemd-249.6-r1 conflicts with sys-apps/hwids[udev]
>
> But when I remove the udev use flag,
> emerge sys-apps/hwids gives
>
>The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
> systemd?
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev
On 02/11/2015 01:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:22:13 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I use NetworkManager for wireless connections, and systemd-networkd for
static ethernet, so I don't use wpa_supplicant directly. However, I
would suggest to simply enable
On 2012-11-11 13:52, 微蔡 wrote:
ok , then why hate systemd ? you seems to hate systemd with no reason.
This is my last reply to this thread. I dislike systemd, for the reasons
I've already stated. Please re-read my responses if you want to know why
I dislike systemd. What I do _hate_ is being
I'm sooo close, but I'm doing something wrong with nfs server, and my nfs
clients keep getting rejection messages.
I got my systemd scripts here:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#NFS
I know the problem is with the nfs server because the nfs clients work normally
if I boot the nfs server
Am 2013-02-09 19:56, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
AFAI understand these 2 lines should be enough to let systemd generate
its relevant unit-files etc.
Right?
Additional thoughts:
Is pam_mount obsolete with systemd?
It is possible to mount my /home via systemd-unit as well
On 2013-07-31 11:45 AM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
The one true way is to set -systemd in your useflags. However anything
that hard depends on systemd will pull it in like AFAIR gnome. Trying to
opt-out of systemd in these cases is not supported and probably not
trivial.
Ok
Am Dienstag 18 Februar 2014, 11:24:05 schrieb Tanstaafl:
Is making the use of systemd or not based on a selected Profile, as
opposed to manually trying to do it via USE flags etc, a practical
request, or not?
Have a look at the files in profiles/targets/systemd/
http://sources.gentoo.org
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:22:23 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Yet again, I respect ones right to use whatever one wants, but I ask
to respect mine as well. That's why I propose a separate systemd
profile for those willing to use it.
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:15 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:22 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I have been trying to get systemd to boot, but I have run
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 08:03:11 -0700
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running systemd for a long time without needing to enable
the dhcpcd service at boot time. Starting with systemd-224 that is no
longer true.
Oops, journalctl tells me that systemd-networkd is segfaulting
repeatedly
Jc García gmail.com> writes:
> > [blocks B ] sys-fs/eudev ("sys-fs/eudev" is blocking
> > sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4, sys-apps/systemd-226-r2)
> > [blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration
> > ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integra
Hello,
Very simple question but did you have "pam" in your global USE flag or
Systemd USE flag ?
If this is on the first, did you compile systemd and may be dependencies
after add it ?
Did you try that:
|systemctl reset-failed|
|For a guy on github, that solve (without e
I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, glad i was offline for that.
however, in my case i'd really like to avoid systemd. can i setup with out
systemd, or do i need to remove and patch later. obviously better to start
without it in this case. so are some of the available kernels
Am Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:27:12 +0100
schrieb Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com>:
> BTW, if you run ps axf and come across '/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
> --daemon' don't panic. RHL advocates of monolithic stack for Linux
> haven't taken over your machine, but that's how udev is packag
On 04/11/17 18:15, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
I have a short question to systemd. I would like to ask your experience
in the changeover. Was it easy? Were there problems?
Change or reinstall? What mean the profis here?
I did both. Changed one system to systemd, re-installed one from scratch
upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files ... so it
merges only partially ...
after that I see:
# systemctl --version
systemd 239
(which is OK)
# eix -I systemd
[U] sys-apps/systemd
Available versions: 239-r2(0/2
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 1:36 PM Tamer Higazi wrote:
[...]
> × systemd-networkd-wait-online.service - Wait for Network to be Configured
> Loaded: loaded
> (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service; enabled;
> vendor preset: disabled)
> Active: failed (Re
1 - 100 of 6173 matches
Mail list logo
