jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CANHhCyR3OZ004f=q7mqcveb2+oxyqf6njy4avxlzxkqvkcu...@mail.gmail.com
...
Hi,
I have added a new STORCLASS definition and STRAGE GROUP ~
translation,
validation went on successful. When I tried activating the
SYS1.DFSMS.SCDS using
This sounds like the holiday problem we have here. The country is divided in 3
regions, to spread holidays a little more over time. People living near the
border of a region regularly have problems if their children are on different
schools, lying in different regions, or one or both parents
Dave Day wrote:
Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the Init
Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing. On a
z/OS 1.12 system, if the SMFPRM member has NOACTIVE set, my IEFACTRT exit is
not invoked. When I set it to ACTIVE, it is.
thanks to the captain!
it was missing JCL auth in TSOAUTH.
best
stephen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Connect:Direct is one of the premier MFT (Managed File Transfer) tools
available. There are others, as CA-XCOM has already been mentioned. Within
the realm of MFTs, they are rarely interoperable. If a business or trading
partner needs to exchange via C:D, then you need C:D, etc. The
Does any one out there have a basic report (can be in SAS) which produces
a report based on SMF 119 records. I wanted to see where FTP's are going
and DSNS being sent.
Thanks in advance.
Andy S. White
--
For IBM-MAIN
I wonder what the TERMINAL-command is for. When I change SCRSIZE I can see that
something changes but not for the application issuing some TPUTs (I think that
are TPUTs). I traced the data send to the screen and there where only the
typical 2-byte-fields giving the position. And this is shown
http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/supercomputers/231902445?queryText=Paul+McDougall+
snip
IBM Unites Mainframe, Windows SystemsIBM opens zEnterprise mainframes to the
world of Windows apps. Until now, IBM only supported Linux or AIX-based blades
on zEnterprise.
By Paul McDougall
Do you have MXG? If you do I may have something already coded.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Andy White awh...@metlife.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 11/10/2011 08:21
Subject:SMF 119 report
Sent by:IBM Mainframe
Um, I'm pretty sure that native z/os FTP supports both compression and
checkpoint/restart. Of course, this is z/os to z/os. Other platforms vary
widely on their interoperability and features. Oddly enough, many of these
other platform products use Windows strategies rather than the RFC's.
Since we don't have MXG or SAS, we use a program (written in C) from CBT file
600.
The output looks like this:
BK1C 2011/11/09 00:05:02.92 FTPC119-02I FTP Client cm=STOR lr=226 cp=65032
cf=21 sa=192.168.20.12 sl=192.168.20.13 su=bekco\su ASCII
Stream File Seq trs=00:05:02.67
Juergen Keller wrote:
I wonder what the TERMINAL-command is for.
The TERMINAL SCRSIZE setting controls how TSO line-mode
terminal housekeeping is performed. Fullscreen applications
are free to use an available screen size different from the
one used by line-mode TSO. Of course, many fullscreen
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
This sounds like the holiday problem we have here. The country is
divided in 3 regions, to spread
holidays a little more over time. People living near the border of a
region regularly have
On 11/10/2011 5:23 AM, Juergen Keller wrote:
Yes we can change the application program but its a very old one and I think
noone will do that. As explained before the same Problem happens with SDSF
nativ under TSO and that is definitely a new application.
New?? Lol! That native 3270 support
Greg Price of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 11/10/2011 08:46:03 AM:
Unless they have fixed it fairly recently, SDSF does not handle large
screen
sizes well (unless running as an ISPF application).
One problem with large screens in SDSF (ISPF) is that the
Radoslaw, I agree that it about learning to drive. And I have been through the
manual, may times. I have been through the TMS manual, as much as I know about
it. I have been throught DFSMS Object and Tape planning manuals. That is why
I am asking for help. I have my TMS scratch pools set
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:35:18 -0600, John P Kalinich wrote:
Greg Price of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 11/10/2011 08:46:03 AM:
Unless they have fixed it fairly recently, SDSF does not handle large
screen
sizes well (unless running as an ISPF application).
One
To reinforce what I said earlier:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2E4B0/2.21?SHELF=IEA2BKB2DT=20100701092419
The system invokes IEFACTRT only when the installation is collecting SMF
record types 4, 5, 30, 32, 34, or 35.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ford Prefect
Blasphemer!
;-)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
42 is _not_ the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TSO SCREENSIZE
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:35:18 -0600, John P Kalinich wrote:
Greg
Neither is Unix, nor ACSII
snip
42 is _not_ the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
/snip
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
In 9741969858283522.wa.wfarrellus.ibm@bama.ua.edu, on 11/09/2011
at 05:15 PM, Walt Farrell wfarr...@us.ibm.com said:
Wouldn't help in this case, I'm afraid. The relevant TSO/E message
gives two dynamic allocation error return codes that are relevant,
but both of them just say talk to your
Shmuel,
Like the message. That said contact your systems programmer.
Ef
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Hi,
I'm looking for some DB2 specific recommendations regarding User Catalogs,
specially if there are any rules of thumb as a start point for defining the
infrastructure for DB2 (like each member has its own catalog or something like
that). I've searched the forum and asked daddy google, but
My biggest pet peeve is the 3am panic mode and you desperately look up the
message to see:
User Action: Contact your system programmer.
My mind goes blank for a second, then I start to come to terms with the fact
that I am him, and he doesn't know what the heck is wrong or he wouldn't have
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00b038bb...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 11/10/2011
at 11:48 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Remember how old the 3270 architecture is. Wikipedia says about 1972.
Think 1 Mhz 8080 as top of the line micro processor. The original
3277 and its
John
3274
3271
STUPID
From the perspective of the new millennium. At the time (1970 approximately)
I'm sure it was a sensible design choice.
Chris Mason
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:48:30 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
...
Remember how old the 3270 architecture is.
In 9616460194674244.wa.juergen.kellerdeutscheboerse@bama.ua.edu,
on 11/10/2011
at 07:23 AM, Juergen Keller juergen.kel...@deutsche-boerse.com
said:
I wonder what the TERMINAL-command is for.
It saves the information for use by VTIOC and applications.
When I change SCRSIZE I can see that
I don't have any DB2 specific advice regarding user catalogs, but when you
ask about each member having its own catalog, if you mean member in the
sense of DB2 data sharing, that really won't work, since DB2 treats the
whole group as a logical entity. Now if you are referring to individual
A few suggestion:
We are a small DB2 shop , so one user catalog supports 3 subsystems (
PROD,TEST,DEVL) . Isolation of production is also a best practice.
Depending on the number of archives logs that you produce and keep cataloged,
they will consume space , size the catalog appropriately
My phrasing is getting to be very poor. By STUPID, I meant more that the
architecture implementation was primitive compared to today's architecures. Not
that the designers or the design was stupid. It just resulted in a stupid
computer (one with not many abilities) compared to today's smart
Part of it is nomenclature. DB/2 catalog vs MVS catalog. I put each DB/2
catalog in a separate UCAT. It's all part of the installation process for
DB/2. Also specify SYSVOLs or SMS managed for tables and indices and
matching
SSI. Still want to buggy whip whomever picked DSN as DB/2 hlq!
Here is an update from the CA Development team:
We have met with the FRDPAS support and it appears that the database
can be
moved in-flight. But they (meaning the Assurant people - ddk) should
contact
Innovation to insure that they
understand what restrictions will be required (like
I have opened an ETR with IBM and pretty much found the same thing as
others. Not well managed.
So I have requested change/enhancement requests.
Here is what IBM has opened on my behalf
MR1110115444 - Need tools to monitor the SHRLIBRGNSIZE usage SMF records
would help
MR1110114548
I would be remiss if I did not take this opportunity to thank the people
at Innovation for stepping
forward and taking the initiative to contact the right people at CA and
working this out to CA's satisfaction.
I've worked with Innovation for many years while I was at a lot of
different
---snip
Remember how old the 3270 architecture is. Wikipedia says about 1972.
Think 1 Mhz 8080 as top of the line micro processor. The original
3277 and its controllers were STUPID. Rather than put a more powerful
processor
---snip
Remember how old the 3270 architecture is. Wikipedia says about 1972. Think 1 Mhz 8080 as top of the line micro
processor. The original 3277 and its controllers were STUPID. Rather than put a more powerful
During installation the vendor helped find the things we missed. After
going though our notes I have responded with the information offline.
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan Goossen, ACG, CL
Tape Specialist
ACT Mainframe Storage Group
Personal: 651-361-4541
Department Support Line:
---snip
Government intelligence.
---unsnip---
Let's not start another oxymoron thread. PLEASE!! :-)
Rick
-snip-
My phrasing is getting to be very poor. By STUPID, I meant more that the architecture implementation was
primitive compared to today's architecures. Not that the designers or the design was stupid. It just resulted
---snip---
I don't have any DB2 specific advice regarding user catalogs, but when you
ask about each member having its own catalog, if you mean member in the
sense of DB2 data sharing, that really won't work, since DB2 treats
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:48 AM, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Remember how old the 3270 architecture is. Wikipedia says about 1972. Think 1
Mhz 8080 as top of the line micro processor. The original 3277 and its
controllers were STUPID. Rather than put a more powerful
--snip--
Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the Init Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing. On a z/OS 1.12 system, if the SMFPRM member has NOACTIVE set, my
Just as note to self. VAR's/vendors, provide what's in the contract whether
it be hardware support, software support, training, response time, MTBF,
inventory levels and performance bonds. In an evaluation matrix you can use
it to see which vendors match up with what the corporate needs.
W dniu 2011-11-10 22:20, Ed Finnell pisze:
[...]
IBM does assurance reviews(as do others)
to help determine who's responsible and where are the weak spots.
he above is theory. I can provide several example of lack of such
process, despite it's described in IBM's standards and manuals.
--
Rick,
I don't think your method would work. If you suppress the record types
that IEFACTRT is dependent on then it will not be called. If you want the
exit to be called but not have the records recorded I think you would have
to exclude them with IEFU8x.
Scott
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM,
Guess I live in a theoretical world 'cause I sure been through a bunch of
them. Maybe it's virtual...chuckle
In a message dated 11/10/2011 4:57:02 P.M. Central Standard Time,
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl writes:
he above is theory.
I would think that's dependant on when the filters are applied: during
collection or just before writing the completed record. You may be
right; I just don't know with a high-enough level of certainty.
Rick
On 11/10/2011 4:14 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
This is the behaviour I would expect. IEFACTRT is dependant on
the data collected by SMF processing. No SMF processing means no
data, therefore, no reason to even attempt invoking the exit.
While irrelevant to the OP, IEFACTRT antedates SMF by a few
On 11/10/2011 4:15 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
And the original IBM 3270 screen size was Model 1, 12 lines by 40
characters. Model 2 (24 * 80) didn't come along until later.
I seem to recall the model 2 to be available at the same time as
the model 1, but that may be due to my dismissing the
To all actually interested in 3270 pre-history
And the original IBM 3270 screen size was Model 1, 12 lines by 40 characters.
Model 2 (24 * 80) didn't come along until later.
It was my possibly faulty recollection that just about all of the first
generation of 3270 equipment was announced -
Rick,
My memory is iffy here as well but I do remember that we had 12 x 80 screens
but the model number was 2260. The screen was incredibly small. This was in the
early 1970#39;s.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Re: note to self.
Unfortunately not all VAR#39;s are reputable. This has nothing to do with any
company under discussion.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
Most times the problem is that you have specified one SCDS for your changes and
are trying to activate another one. Sometimes people forget to put the DSN in
quotes on one page, and sometimes they try to activate from a completely
different dataset than they think they are using. This is
Who/What are you responding to?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Brian Westerman brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:50:17
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
In 1320976541.27279.yahoomailmob...@web161405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on
11/10/2011
at 05:55 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
My memory is iffy here as well but I do remember that we had 12 x 80
screens but the model number was 2260.
There was a 2260 Model 1[1] and a 2260 Model 2. Both shipped
In 4ebc3ed0.4040...@ync.net, on 11/10/2011
at 03:14 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
This is the behaviour I would expect. IEFACTRT is dependant on the
data collected by SMF processing.
There is a difference between SMF data collection and SMF data
recording. Tying them together is,
In
CAJTOO59W20A0m-Gu8nBtudc_h=1ks9hz4gerfvqhrradmqf...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/10/2011
at 03:15 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
DR had CP/M 86 for the 8086 but didn't meet with IBM to put it
on the IBM PC,
Because they wouldn't talk to DR without an unacceptable contract.
so
In 4ebc3b0f@ync.net, on 11/10/2011
at 02:58 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
Wasn't there also a 3276,
That came later, along with the 3278 and 3279,
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We
In 4ebc3a73.5070...@ync.net, on 11/10/2011
at 02:56 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
While the Windoze-based processors
There are none. The same processors running windoze are capable of
running better operating systems. In fact, IBM announced support for
Linux in a zBX before it
Thanks for the link, Chris.
I happen to have a GX20-1878-3 (October 1978) 3270 Information Display
System Reference Summary in the top drawer of my desk. It shows the screen
size of a Mod 1 as 12x40, although I never worked with a Mod 1 or ever even
saw one, to my knowledge.
My first 3270
I happen to have a GX20-1878-3 (October 1978) 3270 Information Display
System Reference Summary in the top drawer of my desk. It shows the screen
size of a Mod 1 as 12x40, although I never worked with a Mod 1 or ever even
saw one, to my knowledge.
Just about the only place you would be
62 matches
Mail list logo
