I'd have preferred it without the idiot in the road, myself.
But that was the only opportunity I had. I chose the spot
(on the outside of the curve, contrary to some suggestions)
so that I could get the riders in sunlight - the tall buildings
meant that a lot of the downtown stuff was in
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:53:24PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm going to try to take some time off and head down to the Monterey Bay
Aquarium for some R n R. Photographing the jellyfish exhibit has been on
my to do list for a while. Has anyone photographed the exhibit - any
suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 February 2006 06:37
To: John Francis
Subject: Re: Seeking advice on photographing cyclists
Hey John,
Rather nice shot. I'm trying to decide if the person in the
yellow adds or detracts from the shot.
Hello Shel,
Just got back from there on Saturday. I can tell you two things not
to do. 1) Don't go with the kids - mine were constantly wanting to
move on. 2) Don't go when the aquarium is jam packed (like Saturday).
The crowds make it difficult to shoot.
So for me not really being prepared
The two low points for the lens is the slow max aperture and the
length it extends when zoomed. It is not a lens that can be used
handheld (over 300mm), nor is it very useful for sporting events (due
to the speed).
I find that I get more use from my APO 300/F4. When I need the extra
Hi all
I recently acquired a Pentax K2 in prisine condition cosmetically but with
the shutter stuck and mirror up. I have a fresh set of batteries in and the
meter is working but I can't get the shutter to trip even on the manual
speeds, unfortunately I don't have the users handbook for
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/22 Wed AM 08:24:03 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographing the Jellies
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:53:24PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm going to try to take some time off and head down to the Monterey Bay
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/22 Wed AM 08:31:56 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Seeking advice on photographing cyclists
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 February 2006 06:37
To: John Francis
Subject:
A friend found a lens he has been looking for on this company's web
site. Anyone here know anything about hotbuyselectronics.com ? They
have prices that seem to be too good to be true and claim to have
stock of things no one else has. My gut feeling is that they are
probably scammers.
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:07 PM, Gonz wrote:
Thinking that the universe must have a beginning is a very narrow
and human construct. We live trapped in time, so we have a
problem with something like God that exists outside of time.
Outside of time, the terms beginning and end are
Hi everyone,
Interesting comments and quite illuminating with respect to what's
really important.
I've been shooting some of this stuff with my MZ-S with varying
success rates. for example. Jumps are a no brainer you can easily
pre-focus. panning action is tougher espeically if you're up close
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend found a lens he has been looking for on this company's web
site. Anyone here know anything about hotbuyselectronics.com ? They
have prices that seem to be too good to be true and claim to have
stock of things no one else has. My gut feeling is
I have a wacom Intuos 3 and have recently used the graphire 3 model.
While both are good products I do not regret shelling out the extra
cash for the intuos. The tactile feel of the intuos is so much better.
Its the little stuff like the weight and balance of the pen the
friction on the active
On 2/21/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and polish your skin...
Now that's just *weird*.
You ~do~ know to whom I was referring, don't you? The man with the
shiniest skin in history:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On 2/21/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot. That must be Frank leading the pack, no?
I wish...
LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Patrick Genovese wrote:
1. Normal operations with the pen (such as using winddows
apps) will require big sweeping arm movements. This is
because the tablet maps to the screen area. This means
that the top left corner of the tablet maps to the top
left corner of your screen.
Actually, at
Hi John, I have one behaving the same way.
I can force it to cock but it locks up every time.
I'm convinced it's electronic but haven't had time to
dig deeper.
The owners manual can be found here:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/K2.pdf
Don
-Original Message-
From: John
On Feb 22, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well this certainly doesn't look good:
http://www.resellerratings.com/seller_info.pl?seller_id=1938
Only 112 ratings, but an average score of 1.12 out of 10 is
worrying to
say the least!
Read the comments and be afraid...
Thanks. I'll
For panoramas, WB should not be in Auto.
If it is, the WB may very well change from shot to shot, and you'll never
the the same value/WB in all the frames of a sequence.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bruce,
Well, I won't be taking any kids, and my schedule allows mid-week visits.
I'd probably go on a Tuesday or Wednesday, and try to get in as close to
opening time as possible.
Not sure if I'll have replaced the digi by then, although I'd like to try
it for this project.
Your shot's quite
Hi John,
Thanks for your input. I believe that I can make better photos than the
fellow who put up that gallery, and that I'll be able to get better shots,
and better quality shots. Nothing like a little hubris first thing in the
AM, eh LOL
Do you think digital would have helped you get better
Bruce Dayton wrote:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2912.htm
That's an awesome shot, Bruce. Well done!
The best way to photograph jellies is under controlled studio lighting
in small aquariums that limit the animal's movement. Obviously not
possible in a public place. I think Bruce
At the Monterey Bay Aquarium, you can get right up to the glass on
most of the Outer Bay exhibits.
Bring a monopod with a ball head or flex head on it. A tripod is
unwieldy in the often crowded, dimly lit areas, but a monopod will be
fine. Light levels are low and you need something to
On 2/22/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot. That must be Frank leading the pack, no?
Paul
Frank's the one in the bright top leading the charge to the pub across
the street. All of a sudden these yahoos on treadlies got in the way.
Dave g
That's a cool shot Bruce.
Dave
On 2/22/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Handheld
ISO 1600, 1/60 sec @ f/4.0, 45mm
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2912.htm
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=83611forum_id=80
This year's Pentax + Samsung booth on PMA fair is about as big as Canon's
one so who knows? ;-)
This is pretty much what I and a couple of others said to expect as a
PMA announcement
Maybe it will just be announced now, just like the 645 Digital has
been annonced with couple basic specs but would be ready later?
Maybe lenses?
2006/2/22, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MX preferably but KM/KX also accepted.
Make me an offer I can refuse ;)
Note: shipping would be to Belgium.
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
Hi Don
Hi John, I have one behaving the same way.
I can force it to cock but it locks up every time.
I'm convinced it's electronic but haven't had time to
dig deeper.
The owners manual can be found here:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/K2.pdf
Sorry to here it. I've noticed that
On 2/20/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great shot. What a look and very well executed.
I've been looking at all these wonderful photos that people have been
posting over the last week or so, and I have to say that I'm most
impressed with all of them. I understand that favourite and
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For panoramas, WB should not be in Auto.
Only if you're shooting JPEGs.
If it is, the WB may very well change from shot to shot, and you'll never
the the same value/WB in all the frames of a sequence.
Unless you're shooting in RAW mode, in which case you
Patrick.
You are not mentioning the speed of the lenses below. The speed is crucial.
Anything slower than F. 2.8 is not suitable for action photography IMO.
Sports photographer Jerry Lodriguss recommendations regarding equipment
focuses on lenses faster than or equal to F. 2.8, and I tend to
Mark, I'm pleased to read that there seems to be a general feeling that
the rumor is true. It may be due to an expected significant pixel count
jump as a reward for our long wait.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Boris, Paul, Mark, Ken, Frank, Rick and others who took the time
to provide feedback on the photo. Much apprciated.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - My Lonely Ass (On the Way to Work)
Hello Shel,
You can get right up to the glass if you want. The shot I showed was
not against the glass. One of the biggest problems you are going to
have is that the jellies are always moving. You can't have too slow
of a shutter speed. This is where digital would do way better than
film.
On 2/22/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, you over-compliment me ;-). There is very little to this shot.
This time of year in Israel one can walk by the road and collect very
nice flower shots by the dozen.
First of all, Boris, just because there may be thousands of
Excellent glass mechanics.
User condition externally.
$200 shipped.
Collin
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
Is the 3.5 a better lens than the 2.8?
Shel
Finally got it apart. Found a stray scrap of metal of
some sort - no idea what it broke off of. It's in the
shape of a thin tab with a bump like a contact of some
sort in the end. It had gotten in the works in the
bottom of the body, jamming the mechanism. Removed it
and the camera functions
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:20:09 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey troops.
First Raw proccessing from the Snow Golf.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/Wagg%20Road%20Open%202006/?action=viewcurrent=chainsaw-woods.jpg
This is me, Frank can verify, and this was
Yet another to add to my public payphone collection.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4112142size=lg
Comments are always appreciated.
cheers,
frank, who's going to be with children this weekend, so this is
actually next week's PAW a bit early...
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
On 2/14/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do differently?
I could have sworn that I commented on this one already, but I don't
see my reply
Hi All,
I own SMC K 30mm/2.8 lens and use it for slides. But consider dslr so 45m
angle would be very nice indeed. But...what about FA35/2.0 as standard
lens?What about optical performance between two?Which one is sharper and
has better bokeh?What about color rendition?Has anyone had both and
Mildly amusing. I'm not much of a fan of the hand in the face shot -
probably because I have so many of them of my wife.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 9:03:23 AM, you wrote:
ft Yet another to add to my public payphone collection.
ft
On 2/14/06, Jon Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amtrak's Piedmont making a very quick stop in
Salisbury, NC - Dec 31, 2005. Three shots in the dark.
Pretty good for guesswork regarding shutter time, I
think...
A3000 with A50/2.
http://slacky.railyakuza.com/peso/
Very cool shots!
cheers,
Digital is at it's best when dealing with large, uniform expanses
such as the blue of the jellyfish tanks; the noise from high-ISO
film shows up rather too much for my liking.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 07:02:11AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for your input. I believe that I
Nice. The shadow and resonse of the subject make it interesting. Did said
subject complain?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yet another to add to my public payphone collection.
Frank, thanks. You did comment on the previous PESO of mine, similar but not
the same image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Fall Morning at a Michigan Lake
On 2/14/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check
Frank, was this what you were looking for (person in image) or did he/she
just happen to walk into your scene?
I'm not sure I get this one. The emphasis here seems to be on the
pedestrian, not the phone.
I guess that's the TOLL we have to pay. BG
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
With a lie like that, I'd have used a mashie niblick ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/Wagg%20Road%20Open%202006/?action
=viewcurrent=chainsaw-woods.jpg
This is me, Frank can verify, and this was the shot
On 2/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice. The shadow and resonse of the subject make it interesting. Did said
subject complain?
No, I was actually quite surprised; he didn't say a thing. I was
sitting by the payphone just waiting for people to pass by, so I could
get a few
On Feb 22, 2006, at 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I own SMC K 30mm/2.8 lens and use it for slides. But consider dslr
so 45m
angle would be very nice indeed. But...what about FA35/2.0 as standard
lens?What about optical performance between two?Which one is
sharper and
has better
On Feb 22, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Tom C wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4147790
Hadn't had time to look at this before ... nice! I particularly like
the very simple composition.
Godfrey
http://www.pmai.org/xpma2006/exhibitors/pdf/floor_plan.pdf
Pentax/Samsun, second booth on the left from the entrance. Not quite
as big as Canon's or Fuji's, but still sizeable compared to most.
On 2/21/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just two more after this and the 2005 set will be complete... :-)
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/50.htm
All comments and critique appreciated.
I like this one! Is she merely soaking up some warm winter sun, is
she
Jon Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only problem I see now is the winding lever and cap
are rather badly gashed up. I got impatient and used a
bit of an industrial strength tool on the cap that put
a deep gash in it as well as some scratches on the
lever. I'd like to find replacements for these,
Here's one of my efforts:
http://pug.komkon.org/04aug/jllyfsh1.html
I've never tried this, but I understand the best results are obtained by (1)
lens against the glass and (2) flash against the glass.
Joe
On 2/13/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd like the 77 more...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/thats_not_a_dog.html
Is that the full-sized dachshund, then?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi Godfrey,
Thank you and sorry for the same questions.
Yes I like angle of 24mm lens and plan to buy A24 to have for PZ1 and dslr
when I buy it. So thank you for commnents on the lens!
I own 30mm lens very happy but just wondered if FA is better. So either
new FA 35mm is really better or you have
I don't have any levers or caps but the piece of metal
you found is the spring that holds the wind lever in
the home (as vs stand off) position.
Works fine without it, just a bit annoying when the
lever wanders out of position, I'm a left eyed shooter
and the lever pokes me in the right eye when
I've got the A35/2, not the FA, as well as the K30/2.8.
So a comparison here is not specifically to your question, but may be
useful to some.
On film the K30/2.8 is significantly better than the A35/2.
On digital the results are similar. It seems that the white balance
abilities of the
Hi!
What can you tell me about www.CaymanCamera.net? Are they reputable
enough to justify a rather expensive deal with them?
Thanks.
Boris
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and polish your skin...
Now that's just *weird*.
You ~do~ know to whom I was referring, don't you? The man with the
shiniest skin in history:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
Eeek!
I'm gonna
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:20:09
US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey troops.
First Raw proccessing from the Snow Golf.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/Wagg%20Road%20Open%202006/?action=viewcurrent=chainsaw-woods.jpg
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking at all these wonderful photos that people
have been
posting over the last week or so, and I have to say that I'm
most
impressed with all of them. I understand that favourite and
best
are completely different, and I also understand
It was in the shop getting a new nib.
Had to use the 5 iron.:-)
Dave
With a lie like that, I'd have used a mashie
niblick ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/14/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4107177size=lg
Frank, I deliberately did not read the rest of the comments. Knowing
that I am late I could do that, but I chose not to.
I think it is fine photo, but the leftmost part of the
On 2/22/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Boris. You may have been late commenting,
but I was even later getting back to you (I'm just now catching up
after having fallen behind over the past week or so).
As far as the distractions on the left, well,
I think the person is shielding their eyes from the sun, not hiding from the
camera.
--
Cheers,
Bob
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever
believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-- Richard Dawkins
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault
On 2/22/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the person is shielding their eyes from the sun, not hiding from the
camera.
You know, you could be right. I thought the fellow looked my way, saw
me, then covered his face, but maybe I imagined it, and he was just
shading his face from the
frank theriault wrote:
On 2/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice. The shadow and resonse of the subject make it interesting. Did said
subject complain?
No, I was actually quite surprised; he didn't say a thing. I was
sitting by the payphone just waiting for people to
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have
ever
believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-- Richard Dawkins
Is that the same Richard Dawkins who used to be on Hogans Heroes,
and
then hosted
There's a sameness to all the jellie-pix I've seen, no matter how nice they
may be. I really want something different.
Flash? What's that?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: jtainter
Here's one of my efforts:
http://pug.komkon.org/04aug/jllyfsh1.html
I've never tried this, but I
I'm on a bit of a soft focus kick at the moment. Don't worry, I'll get
over it soon.
Real SF - this is one fun lens.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_02_soft/index.htm
Photoshop SF
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_02_slowhand/index.htm
comments welcome as always
D
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have
ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-- Richard Dawkins
Is that the same Richard Dawkins who used to be on Hogans Heroes,
and then
Awesome photographs, Derby! All of them. Especially the ones with the band.
Well done.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 22. februar 2006 22:12
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: GESOs: Soft
I'm on a bit of
On 2/10/06, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up the DA 40mm a few days ago. Here's a sunrise I captured
on the way to work yesterday.
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/781336/1/55859051/Large
Wow! Now ~that's~ a dramatic sunset. I like the wires in there;
they actually do a
I have, the light is very low, so you have to use high iso or the
movement will show up as blur. Of course it goes without saying that a
tripod is mandatory.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm going to try to take some time off and head down to the Monterey Bay
Aquarium for some R n R. Photographing
I'm getting familiar with my newly arrived DS and tried out the white
balance settings. The problem is that no matter what setting I put the
white balance on the result, review on LCD screen, all appear to have the
same color cast. I compared these results with my Canon A-70 compact
digital
On 2/22/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a sameness to all the jellie-pix I've seen, no matter how nice they
may be. I really want something different.
snip
Shel, I'm offended. That's a very specieist comment.
The pix to which you refer don't look the same to other
On 22/2/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi!
What can you tell me about www.CaymanCamera.net? Are they reputable
enough to justify a rather expensive deal with them?
Thanks.
Boris
I smell a 31 Ltd !!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 2/13/06, Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Friday night I shot a concert by young Danish jazz band Jazz Kamikaze who
played the Mariehamn Jazz, Roots Blues Festival 2006.
They were really, I mean really, good. (Maybe Jens B. knows about them?)
Anyway I uploaded a
On 22/2/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most professional sports photographers have the following set of equipment:
3 top-of-the-line digital camera bodies, such as the Canon 1D or Nikon D2H
($3,000 each)
6 Extra batteries ($100 each)
Extreme wide angle 14mm f/2.8 ($1,400)
Wide
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 February 2006 21:09
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographing the Jellies
There's a sameness to all the jellie-pix I've seen, no matter
how nice they may be. I really want something
On 2/22/06 3:12 PM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on a bit of a soft focus kick at the moment. Don't worry, I'll get
over it soon.
Real SF - this is one fun lens.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_02_soft/index.htm
Photoshop SF
On 2/22/06, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on a bit of a soft focus kick at the moment. Don't worry, I'll get
over it soon.
Real SF - this is one fun lens.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_02_soft/index.htm
Photoshop SF
On 2/22/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's an exhibition, isn't it? Nail them to the wall!
I thought many of the pictures shown were quite nice, but as you say, a bit
samey. But isn't that in the nature of jellyfish? I mean, what else are they
going to do all day but float around?
On 22 Feb 2006 at 10:23, Christian wrote:
The best way to photograph jellies is under controlled studio lighting
in small aquariums that limit the animal's movement. Obviously not
possible in a public place. I think Bruce made the best of the
situation: High ISO and wide open. Use as
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/2/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most professional sports photographers have the following set of equipment:
3 top-of-the-line digital camera bodies, such as the Canon 1D or Nikon D2H
($3,000 each)
6 Extra batteries ($100 each)
Extreme wide
New DS models likely still have firmware revision 1.0 installed out
of the box.
If you are using Auto Picture or any of the program presets (scene
modes), the white balance setting is defined by the preset. In
firmware revisions 1.x (all of them), the camera would allow you to
select a
On 22/2/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Licensing photos from Ken Rockwell when yours turn out like crap $50,000
LOL. Cheap at twice the price!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Rob Studdert wrote:
Big rubber hoods
Did we change the subject? ooh I hope so! :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
frank theriault wrote:
So, another anti-medusite, eh?
-frank
That depends frank... Stinging or stingless? Rightside up or upside
down? Where do you stand on the issues? eh? These Cnidarians are a
divisive bunch.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/2/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most professional sports photographers have the following set of equipment:
3 top-of-the-line digital camera bodies, such as the Canon 1D or Nikon D2H
($3,000 each)
6 Extra batteries
Hi
I just want to know where you find a club that you can shoot ISO 200 and still
have 1/125 second wide open My last club shoot, I
rated my film between 6400 and 12800 and still could only shoot at about 1/15
at f2.8.
Maybe the conditions here in this province are much worse than the media
Many thanks to those who have commented on this shot. I have taken a
stab at BW conversion:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2788bw.htm
Original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2788.htm
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 7:33:12 PM, you wrote:
JT
Hi,
I guess I should have mentioned that I've seen the exhibit several times,
so I know about the light. A tripod isn't mandatory, although, for some
shots, it could be useful. Blur might be nice, BTW ...
On a separate note, your Mitch Hedberg sig got me to rent one of his DVD's.
Thanks!
Shel
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This was taken the same day as the Angry Sea shot, but we had moved to
a different beach.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2878.htm
Comments welcome
Nice one, Bruce.
Perhaps some creative or innovate techniques might enhance the photographic
viewing experience.
They don't just float around. Some are quite capable of initiating and
maintaining movement on their own.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
I thought many of the pictures shown were quite
Shel,
One thought I had was to take a multi exposure or perhaps just cover
the lens while on bulb - first shot, then some movement, then another
image and so on. Sort of showing a directional move, rather than just
a blurred move.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 4:09:33 PM, you wrote:
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
