On 15/3/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Huh? I have the F35-70/3.5-4.5 macro and find it to be a pretty good
lens overall...
Sorry Godders, I meant that the range of focal length is a bit limiting.
Actually the Coke bottle is better built - the lens is a collection of
plastic
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/16 Thu AM 04:32:28 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Taylor Watches His Friend, Felix
Taylor loves the computer screen, and amuses himself by studying
Photoshop and keeping an eye on his friend, Felix.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote on 16.03.06 0:31:
Here's a list of Pentax products which will disappear from the catalogue
this summer:
http://www.pentax.de/_de/photo/news/index.php?photonewsgruppe=news_id
=151
Most notably the 645 and the 67.
Thwy kill only 645NII body, not lenses. Seems that
Hi all,
Tokina is showing 'mock-ups' of their new AT-X lenses at PIE 2006. Amongst
them the pair of f/2.8 zooms that will get DA brothers (or sisters?)
See: http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/pie2006news.html
--
Regards, Lucas
I've had Felix for years. He's a very active cat. He chases bugs, goes in
and out of his cat door, plays hide-and-seek, and even has his own pets - a
bowl of fish - that he amuses himself with. He has a twin brother,
Sylvester, who's looking for a new home. Sylvester comes in a small EXE
file.
Quoting Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thwy kill only 645NII body, not lenses. Seems that 645 will be alive again
with upcoming 645D.
I think it is also interesting that the ring flash is finally discontinued. With
the recent introduction of FA-D macro lenses, and the upcoming 645D, I
Jostein wrote on 16.03.06 11:10:
I think it is also interesting that the ring flash is finally discontinued.
With
the recent introduction of FA-D macro lenses, and the upcoming 645D, I really
hope they will replace it.
Yes, with P-TTL, HSS and wireless capable version please. It would be even
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/16 Thu AM 09:47:24 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Taylor Watches His Friend, Felix
I've had Felix for years. He's a very active cat. He chases bugs, goes in
and out of his cat door, plays hide-and-seek, and even has
Anyone know how to work on the syncs inside the MX?
IOW anyone have a repair manual available?
(That MX is nice, but it should be nicer.)
Collin
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
Op Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:06:27 +0100 schreef Collin R Brendemuehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyone know how to work on the syncs inside the MX?
IOW anyone have a repair manual available?
Mr. Roberts: http://robertstech.com/pentax.htm
(That MX is nice, but it should be nicer.)
(They are :o)
--
A Pentax user? He can't be pro ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16. mars
I'd be happy to discuss life and photo with you Boris. If I' able to make
the trip to the big city. If you go, let me know in advance.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 15, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Ah, the joys of Canonware :-P
What does Canon have to do with the design of the FA31?
Don't bite, this was to tease Tom :-)
I fit a Nikon HN-7 hood to the FA135/2.8 IF because the
I never did comment on this one. It is a lovely photo. Despite being a tiny
bit too tight. It makes me smile.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
Hi Troops.
Do earlier versions of PS have problems opening up files from newer versions.?
The logo i'm doing was done on the ibook (PSCS)G4 OSX. I saved as a Jpg ( I
didi not merge any layers)and moved it to my PC Windows XP Home SP 2.
When i went to open in PS 7 it gave me an eror of not
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:44 PM, Tom C wrote:
It was coming... I bet sales were absolutely abysmal the last two
years.
Did you see how far the prices on the used 645 and 67 gear had dropped?
Now's the time, I suppose, to stock up on 645 glass.
67 glass is probably more
Now it is the rigth time to get them back much cheaper, isn't it?
;)
Gasha
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
All medium format film camera prices have been in the toilet. It's a
wonder that anyone is still manufacturing any of them. I sold my
Hasselblads just before the entire market submerged.
On 3/14/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Scott.
I am very conservative about Christmas trees. So the idea of a motorized
thing transporting them bothers me. I know this is how it's done, but I
don't want to know.
Sorry to burst your bubble. g
On the other hand, I went thru the
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Bertil Holmberg wrote:
Here's a photo to compare it to the original Optio S. This still looks and
feels great but the image quality is inferior, of course.
Why inferior?
A couple of poor pictures that try to illustrate the stabilizer feature. Shot
in low light at f/2.8
G'day All,
In early November last year, after I got my FA 80-200 f2.8, I said to
myself. Davo mate, no more lenses for 12 months.
The DA10-17 is the only lens that has tempted me to break my
resolution. But when I was told that the local distributor didn't even
know if the were going to import
Yes, they sometimes do. The messages you are receiving are typical,
although I don't recall hearing about problems with JPEG's, just PSD and
TIFF files that have layers or which include the use of features not found
in earlier versions.
Dave, you ~really~ should join the Adobe User-toUser
On Mar 16, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I fit a Nikon HN-7 hood to the FA135/2.8 IF because the built in
hood is, to my mind, mostly useless (on the far left):
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/lenshood-lineup-1845.jpg
Thinking on my feet, does the crop mean that one would
Impressionistic images are often dynamic and trigger unique reactions
in us all. This is no exception, but, alas, I'm weak and couldn't
resist my usual base humor.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Get yourself a good tripod. LOL
I have Slik Able 300 DX... I just
It might be if I felt there was any point to shooting film anymore.
I do miss my 903SWC ... my all time favorite camera. Just couldn't
see having one to
sit in the closet.
Godfrey
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:42 AM, Gasha wrote:
Now it is the rigth time to get them back much cheaper, isn't it?
Yep. When the new versions open an old image they ask if you want to
convert or leave it so it can still be openned in the old version sigh.
However, I think what your printer guys were trying to tell you with
that Image Ready comment was they want the logo as a .gif. Jpeg is best
for
Hi Sylwek,
I have the A*200 macro, and love it. For stalking insects, nothing beats the
snap-in focus feature you get with A lenses on AF cameras. :-)
I have used it occasionally for landscapes as well, and I haven't discovered
anything bad to say about it yet.
Jostein
Quoting Sylwester
Hi Boris,
Honest and brutal, but also very (!) subjective this time.
I love this kind of shots. It pulls you in. However, there are a few things that
distracts from the effect, imo. The highlights become little doodles and
introduce a bit of dizziness. I find that a bit... um... dunno if it's
On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:31, graywolf wrote:
I just have had all this stuff put into perspective as I picked up
a used pocket-pc. If you think software for desktops is strange,
just wait until you start messing with Windows PPC stuff. You will
then find out what things are like when MS truely
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Jostein wrote:
I have the A*200 macro, and love it. For stalking insects, nothing
beats the
snap-in focus feature you get with A lenses on AF cameras. :-)
I have used it occasionally for landscapes as well, and I haven't
discovered
anything bad to say about it
Actually, this was PS6 trying to open from PSCS file. Thats were i got the
memory error.
It would load in PSEL3 but i could not do anything with it.
I;'ll finish in CS but, i could not fiqure out why i was getting the errors
last night.
I'll give them every file i can think of g
Dave
PS, No
Before you save as to a JPEG file, flatten layers. JPEG does not
support the notion of layers or alpha channels to the best of my
knowledge. Better to work from the .PSD files.
PS CS has an option in the file handling preferences to maximize PSD
and PSB compatibility, that should not be
Dave Brooks wrote:
Do earlier versions of PS have problems opening up files from newer versions.?
Yes.
The logo i'm doing was done on the ibook (PSCS)G4 OSX. I saved as a Jpg
(I did not merge any layers) and moved it to my PC Windows XP Home SP 2.
When i went to open in PS 7 it gave me an eror
Mark Roberts wrote:
Try re-saving on the original computer, but save it as a multi-layer
TIFF (make sure it's 8-bit color). That should work fine on earlier
versions of Photoshop.
Well, it should work on any earlier versions of Photoshop that support
multi-layer TIFFs! (I'm pretty sure that
I have heard about a cat taboo??? Hope it's not still in effect :)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/SunWorshiper.jpg
Walt
With regards to the 67II, I could say that I told you so on January
1st this year
I wonder when Pentax last made one. Perhaps they should be asked!
Didn't listen to myself though and bought a secondhand one with 3
lenses. It is a fantastic camera. Anyone who wants to dispose of their
obsolete
Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't been so enthusiastic since I bought my DS 18 months ago
The car or the camera? :-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan.
Got my 300 USD Visatec Soloflex 80x80 softbox today. (That's actually quite
cheap - a Lastolite or Elinchrome would cost a bit more). For my Broncolor
Impact strobes.
It's very nice. Not as noce a the Elinchrom I recently rented for an
assignment, though.
But it's very nice and easy to assemble.
Though I've had a web cam and that ilk before, the OptioSV is the
first digicam I've purchased that can do prints.
It only does JPEGs, which, I discovered, are as fickle as slide film
with regard to exposure. However, the LCD helps a bunch, so I've
paridoxically learned more about metering
Great shot! I love it. It portrays the action so well. I like how there is
a center of interest but not in the center but a little to left and I can
feel that he will just fill the space in the right.
Thanks for sharing!
Gaurav
On 3/12/06, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
The
About the SR test shots: Are they shot at the wide or at the long
end. If
wide, it's pretty good. If long, that's very impressive.
Sorry, I should have mentioned that; the first was shot wide (7.9mm)
and the second at 13.7mm (the long range is 23.7mm).
Here's a photo to compare it to
I have the feeling that today's activity dropped a notch (march
break?) so I thought about asking to the eldery members if this effect
makes photos look like when you first started photography ;o)
just for fun
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/111765427/
Here is an interesting way to use your digital camera. I inherited a
pile of 4X5 negatives from my father who used to be a photograher in
halifax Canada. I decided i wanted to preserve the negatives which
already have begun to suffer from neglect etc. Scanning them would take
forever and it
Just a quick grab walking my dog. But I kind of like it. The sky adds a bit
of drama, and I like the slightly off centre composition.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=225419brukerid=35178n
omenus=
Been thinking about converting it to bw and add an old fashioned dramatic
style.
I only looked at six pics, and to my eye, the quality is terrible,
especially for 4x5 negatives. Sorry, not at all impressed.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic MacBournie
Here is an interesting way to use your digital camera. I inherited a
pile of 4X5 negatives from my father who used
I like it. Unfortunatelly can't explain exactly why, maybe the
contrast between the blue and the dark brown, or all the branch
lines...
On 3/16/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick grab walking my dog. But I kind of like it. The sky adds a bit
of drama, and I like the slightly
Neat stuff! They look very good.
This is basically how I've been working with some Minox 8x11mm
negatives. I use the DS, a 2x teleconverter, an extension tube set,
and an A50/2.8 Macro lens to net 2x magnification. With the Minox,
captures like this represent getting about a 5Mpixel image
Come on, Shel, be nice.
They need rendering work, for sure, but as fairly raw scans they are
good data.
Godfrey
On Mar 16, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I only looked at six pics, and to my eye, the quality is terrible,
especially for 4x5 negatives. Sorry, not at all impressed.
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:28:15 +1100, Gaurav Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Great shot! I love it. It portrays the action so well. I like how there
is
a center of interest but not in the center but a little to left and I can
feel that he will just fill the space in the right.
Thanks for
I can't say I'm amazed at the quality, but I think you have managed to record
the look of what were rather ordinary snapshots. Scanning, even on a flatbed
with photo attachement like the Epson 3200, would be a better solution and
would probably take only a bit longer. I did enjoy the pics. Old
I think you can find it here
http://www.robertstech.com/pentax.htm
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Collin R Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: quinta-feira, 16 de Março de 2006 12:06
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: mx repair
Anyone know how to work on the syncs
Nice one. You likely were drawn to the serpentine pattern of the branches
against the sky. It feels somewhat underexposed.
I played with it slightly in Photoshop (pardon me) using the crude
Brightness/Contrast controls, bringing up both brightness and contrast.
There's a lot of detail
Yes very charming!
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Halifax project
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:04:55 -0800
Neat stuff! They look very good.
This is basically how I've been working with some
What makes this shot for me is the contrast between the glossy, modern
cars and the gritty-looking working class neighbourhood. The peachy
light tries it best to beautify the buildings, but it doesn't really
work, does it.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
lol.
From the ingress: Tuesday last week [...] their new gym-rom in the
basement of the old butcher house.
Please apologise my FleetStreet humour... :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006
Congrats, Tim.
I wrote that standing on one leg, to make it lighter...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:31 AM
Subject: Published.
This is nothing big really. I have been published
At my wife's practice they've gone to a paperless office, which made
filing x-rays a pain in the butt. So now they slap 'em on a light
table and shoot 'em with a digital camera that's had exposure and focus
locked in. Much faster and easier (and less expensive) than trying to
scan a great
I am looking for a decent flash for my Pentax *ist DL. I have an old
Vivitar 383 super but I am ready to upgrade. I am looking at the
Sigma EF-500 DG Super based on a recommendation by Mark Roberts. I
am also looking at the Pentax AF400FTZ and was wondering if anyone
had an opinion on
Hi Jens
Thanks for the comment.
Yes, others have made a similar comment. The funny thing is that I
cropped a bit off the top to balance the amount of space at the
bottom. I should have left well enough alone.
Cheers
Brian
Cheers,
Brian
+
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: OT 4 months
The DA10-17 is the only lens that has tempted me to break my
resolution. But when I was told that the local distributor didn't even
know if the were going to import it I felt safe. My local camera store
kindly offered
Hi Tim
Thanks - yes I think I've got the message now!
I'll probably replace it with a better crop over the next few days.
It will give a bit more space at the top.
Cheers,
Brian
+
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
--
Quoting Tim
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2006 22:03
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Halifax project
At my wife's practice they've gone to a paperless office,
which made filing x-rays a pain in the butt.
Over here the medical
Michael
The AF400FTZ uses TTL, no P-TTL or wireless on a istD(L). The zoom is manual.
Toine
On 3/16/06, Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a decent flash for my Pentax *ist DL. I have an old
Vivitar 383 super but I am ready to upgrade. I am looking at the
Sigma EF-500 DG
Does being 50 make me elderly?
Or is it that I prefer chemicals for good monochromatic prints?
But to the question ...
No. They just prove the inferiority of digital.
Everything is faked. Approximated.
Want to improve them and really give them the old look?
Take out the blue component first.
My original OptioS died a couple of weeks ago, leaving me without a
pocket sized camera.
I was anxious to try out the A10 as a replacement. I stopped by my
local camera store, thinking they would not have it yet, intending to
have them call me when they arrived.
Unfortunately, they were in in
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Bob W wrote:
Over here the medical profession advises strongly against filing them
there.
We have rounded edges on our x-rays up here, so it's not so bad.
All I can think of now is the guy I went to school with who used to
lick his fingers after peeling apart
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Does being 50 make me elderly?
No, it's your wooden teeth and white belt that make you elderly.
-Aaron
What I really need is a methodology for diagnosing
the system to locate and correct the issue.
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
Shel : When I said I was amazed at the quality, what I meant was I am amazed
at the quality considering I am just shooting the negs with a digital camera
and inverting them in PS. I recognize that using a scanner would be a
significant improvement but for a quick and dirty grab of these shots
I dragged down the exposure slider and the shadow contrast slider up. on
purpose. As displayed, it is underexposed, yes. I believe the exposure was
pretty spot on, directly out of camera.
But there is no point arguing about this, it was just a feeling I had. As I
read your comment you are
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
There is a thin line between low key, and underexposure, I may have
crossed
it.
There's no line, just a murky delineation that's hard to make out.
;)
-Aaron
No criticism intended. And you're bloody well right. :-)
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO: My Tree
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:48:45 +0100
I dragged down the exposure slider and the shadow contrast
Yeah... that's some double entendre.
Tom C.
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: My Tree
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:52:35 -0500
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
There is a thin line between
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Michael Chan wrote:
I am looking for a decent flash for my Pentax *ist DL. I have an old Vivitar
383 super but I am ready to upgrade. I am looking at the Sigma EF-500 DG
Super based on a recommendation by Mark Roberts. I am also looking at the
Pentax AF400FTZ and was
On Mar 16, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Tom C wrote:
Yeah... that's some double entendre.
Did I only hit double? I was aiming for the quad!
-Aaron
I had to chew a bit on your sentence before I understood what you were
saying. Now I think I have figured it out.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
You did good by me. :-)
Tom C.
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: My Tree
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:07:31 -0500
On Mar 16, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Tom C wrote:
Yeah... that's some double entendre.
Did I
I did not take it as criticism. If you didn't like it in the first place,
you wound have played with it in Photoshop.
I was thinking loud, mainly to educate myself. When I did what I did, I
wasn't very aware why I did it. After expressing this, I know a bit more
about that.
Tim
Mostly harmless
Why de-fish? Why order fish, if you want meat?
I'm not trying to be a smartass here. I don't get this.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
I myself was wondering how such an obvious rank amateur could get a WBC press
pass...
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: RE: Pentax sighting
Date: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:32 am
Size: 806 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
A Pentax user? He can't be pro
I say this not about you, but about myself
Everyday's another day in kindergarten.
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO: My Tree
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:25:42 +0100
I did not take it as criticism.
On 16/3/06, Fernando Terrazzino, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have the feeling that today's activity dropped a notch (march
break?) so I thought about asking to the eldery members if this effect
makes photos look like when you first started photography ;o)
just for fun
On 16/3/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:31, graywolf wrote:
I just have had all this stuff put into perspective as I picked up
a used pocket-pc. If you think software for desktops is strange,
just wait until you start messing with Windows PPC stuff.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: RE: OT 4 months
Why de-fish? Why order fish, if you want meat?
I'm not trying to be a smartass here. I don't get this.
The 10-17 is a fisheye zoom. It's nice and wide, but the fisheye effect gets
tired pretty quickly.
William
And I'm loving it!!!
Norm
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All medium format film camera prices have been in the toilet.
That's the reason why I never have (and probably never will) owned a
fisheye.
Why order fish in the first place, when you will convert it to meat later?
Feels like a broken record here ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
No. They look oversharpened and overly yellow to me. When I started
doing photography (42 years ago), panchromatic Tri-X was available as
was neutral-black Kodabromide paper and Dektol paper developer. I
still have some of those prints and they don't look anything like
this, although some
Well this is something i think is decent enough for a nice logo for a hat.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=Logofinalcopy.jpg
I hope i didi a better job at this than my band shots.
But hey, if the collective hates me over this, my cats love me.:-)
Any way, for
Right now, only the Sigma EF 500 DG Super or the Pentax AF360FGZ will
exploit all the DL body's capabilities. Pentax new higher end flash,
the AF540FGZ, is due soon.
Godfrey
On Mar 16, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Michael Chan wrote:
I am looking for a decent flash for my Pentax *ist DL. I have an
Amazon.com has the *ist D body on clearance for $1,199.94 with free
shipping. I just snagged one; the website says there's only one left
==
Brian Dipert
Senior Technical Editor: Mass Storage, Multimedia (audio, displays, 2-D and
3-D graphics, and still and video
I agree with Tim. I have the Zenitar 16/2.8 fish eye and it's a fun
lens for occasional use, but when I want ultrawide and rectilinear, I
use the DA14/2.8 which is far superior. I bought the Zeni because it
was fishy and would never de-fish it; I had the DA14 already.
Godfrey
On Mar 16,
Enjoy it.
I almost made my no new cameras for 12 months plan last year ...
but I bought the Panny LX1 at Thanksgiving time. Didn't last long: I
sold it and bought the Sony R1.
I'm pretty much done with Pentax purchases until the DA50-135/2.8 and
the new 10Mpixel body are released. With
I'm doing well here. Two threads and two take overs.
LOL
Dave
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 16/3/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:31, graywolf wrote:
I just have had all this stuff put into perspective as I picked up
a used pocket-pc. If you
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:41:11PM +, Cotty wrote:
On 16/3/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:31, graywolf wrote:
I just have had all this stuff put into perspective as I picked up
a used pocket-pc. If you think software for desktops is strange,
I told my wife, no camera equipment for 2006. So far i have ordered the
D200, bought the Sigma 10-20 and am this close to getting the Tamron 90
macro for the Nikon mounts
Damn i hate this list.
lol
Dave
On Mar 16, 2006, at 6:23 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
In early November last
Hi George
thanks for the report, it was an interesting reading for me.
I look forward to the image stabilisation feature comparison test shots ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: George Sinos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:29 PM
To:
I don't care what OS my phone runs as long as it works without
annoying me...
Godfrey
Buying that N***n junk and blaming it on the list?
(Says the man who has just bought a Tokina lens ;-))
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
Grandfather is a single word.
Like in http://www.grandfather.com
best,
mishka
On 3/16/06, Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well this is something i think is decent enough for a nice logo for a hat.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=Logofinalcopy.jpg
I hope i
OK ... ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic Macbournie
Shel : When I said I was amazed at the quality, what I meant was I am
amazed
at the quality considering I am just shooting the negs with a digital
camera
and inverting them in PS. I recognize that using a scanner would be a
I bought my Zenitar after seeing Franks at GFM last year.
Bought as a fun lens only, but, its a decent lens non the less
Dave
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree with Tim. I have the Zenitar 16/2.8 fish eye and it's a fun
lens for occasional use, but when I want ultrawide
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
