I copy my .pef files onto my hard drive. When I work with an image I
will save as a PSD. When I am finished, I will resave as either as a
tif or jpeg, depending on how it will be used.
The only confusing thing to me is that the raw tool in pse3 saves the
changes although as far as I can
All the PS converters save the tool settings, not a revised pef or dng. I
sometimes move a file from one computer to another. The converter adjustments
don't go with it.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I copy my .pef files onto my
If you set Camera Raw to use a distributed settings cache, it will
create a .XMP sidecar file for every RAW file you open with it. That
will contain your adjustment parameters. You move both the original
RAW and the .XMP file together from one system to another in order to
preserve the
John Graves wrote:
I copy my .pef files onto my hard drive. When I work with an image I
will save as a PSD. When I am finished, I will resave as either as a
tif or jpeg, depending on how it will be used.
Copy from memory cards to hard drive. Mark all of them as read only.
Copy them to
frank theriault wrote:
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
Um, when you load the
On Nov 7, 2007, at 5:41 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
I like this photo but it's one that I would crop. The Cinnabon sign
upper left pulls my eye away from the woman and her
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: PESO - And We Have a Winner! - and a dilemma
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch
frank theriault wrote:
is there any way of retrieving the
original photo, as it was out of the camera? Or did I completely
pooch myself by hitting save, instead of save as (in which I'd
have created a new file, rather than replacing the original)?
You could try recovering the original file from
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
Nice snap, but the Cinnabon does two things: makes it look like an ad for
Cinnabon, and makes me REALLY hungry.
Regarding the lost original: as others have said, use a file-recovery
software on your card unless you've taken more photos on it since you
downloaded
going save as one better is to never work on an original. creating a
copy in a working directory away from the directory where you store
originals ... and remembering to identify the original as connected to
the processed image.
yep I have messed up more than once.
Bran
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
In a message dated 11/7/2007 6:13:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-
h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
I'm dead tired last night, doing a bit of processing
Frank, the link gets me a blank page. No photos are
showing up on your blog page either.
Rick
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The
In a message dated 11/7/2007 11:39:07 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
going save as one better is to never work on an original. creating a
copy in a working directory away from the directory where you store
originals ... and remembering to identify the original as
, March 09, 2006 4:24 AM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: OT: We have a winner
A few weeks ago, I was invited to attend a competition shoot
modeled on the
Naked in the House projects.
The rules were simple:
The pictures had to be shot on BW film, the photographer had one camera,
one lens, one roll
Hi Bill,
Congratulations - I'm happy for you.
I really don't care much for the photo - not that you asked - and I bring
up my feelings because the skin texture looks strange to me. That's my
biggest dislike. Did you do something to the skin when processing the
photo? It just looks w-a-y
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer
Subject: RE: We have a winner
Hi William
congratulations on your winner photo first.
On the other side, I still dislike the use of denoiser/cleaner programs on
skin, it's mostly overdone and look unnatural for my taste.
greetings
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: RE: OT: We have a winner
Hi Bill,
Congratulations - I'm happy for you.
I really don't care much for the photo - not that you asked - and I bring
up my feelings because the skin texture looks strange to me. That's my
biggest
William Robb wrote:
Anyway, it turns out I won the contest with the following image:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/works/01500016b.html
Great work! You got the lighting absolutely perfect!
Even more interesting (to me, anyway), is that the first *and* second place
pictures were
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I *am*
going to keep my darkroom equipment and do web BW prints, but I
snip
Yer psychology's showing 8-)
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
Indeed; what the heck happened to the poor woman from the waist down? Is
this, perhaps, a sanitized version [different from the competition entry]
intended for web consumption? It is troubling to think that, after all the
rules for film and simplicity, the judges would allow a scanned and
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, David Bean wrote:
Indeed; what the heck happened to the poor woman from the waist down?
At first glance it appeared to me she was wearing an overall; look at
the derriere, where structure is lost. The tattoo (important in my
opinion for the composition) is also dull.
Congratulations, Bill.
Godfrey
Nicely done, Bill. Congratulations.
And the prize for winning was?
Joe
On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Even more interesting (to me, anyway), is that the first *and*
second place
pictures were printed in an Epson inkjet printer, as opposed to
photographic
paper.
Sigh. It was only a matter of time until digital BW printing started
to overtake
Congratulations Bill!
Does this mean you're famous now?
-Mat
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: OT: We have a winner
Nicely done, Bill. Congratulations.
Thanks Joe.
And the prize for winning was?
I got to stand in front of them and tell them that their first and second
place pictures had rolled off of an inkjet
- Original Message -
From: David Bean
Subject: RE: We have a winner
Indeed; what the heck happened to the poor woman from the waist down? Is
this, perhaps, a sanitized version [different from the competition
entry]
intended for web consumption? It is troubling to think
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: RE: We have a winner
At first glance it appeared to me she was wearing an overall; look at the
derriere, where structure is lost. The tattoo (important in my opinion for
the composition) is also dull.
Funny light
On 3/10/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
Wrom: KHJYFMYXOEAIJJPH
Subject: Re: OT: We have a winner
Nicely done, Bill. Congratulations.
Thanks Joe.
And the prize for winning was?
I got to stand in front of them and tell them that their first
Bill,
I wish I could have been there to see the reaction! Congrats on your
work!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, March 9, 2006, 3:43:31 PM, you wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR From: Joseph Tainter
WR Subject: Re: OT: We have a winner
Nicely done, Bill. Congratulations
A few weeks ago, I was invited to attend a competition shoot modeled on the
Naked in the House projects.
The rules were simple:
The pictures had to be shot on BW film, the photographer had one camera,
one lens, one roll of film, and half an hour to shoot a nude model using
available light
Congratulations William.
dk
On 3/8/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few weeks ago, I was invited to attend a competition shoot modeled on the
Naked in the House projects.
The rules were simple:
The pictures had to be shot on BW film, the photographer had one camera,
one lens, one
Congratulations Bill. I'm not surprised you won. And I'm not surprised
that the winners were inkjet prints.
On Mar 8, 2006, at 10:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
A few weeks ago, I was invited to attend a competition shoot modeled
on the Naked in the House projects.
The rules were simple:
The
Hi!
Anyway, it turns out I won the contest with the following image:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/works/01500016b.html
Congratulations.
Boris
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: OT: We have a winner
A few weeks ago, I was invited to attend a competition shoot modeled
on the
Naked in the House projects.
The rules were simple:
The pictures had to be shot on BW film, the photographer had one
camera,
one lens, one roll of film, and half
Hi!
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters degree, just had a
photo contest and I won first prize with this one. I'm not sure if I get
anything
On 11/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
You Brits seem to have raised being spanked by a middle aged lady to the
point of religious experience.
WW
Sort of like life in the Robb household, no?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 11/2/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most of my words were spent defending myself against misconstruals.
I met misconstruals once. She was nice :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:59:25 -, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have
a winner) With a
Matron will put some ointment on.
You're right. There's always
In a message dated 2/10/2006 9:10:17 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keith McGuinness wrote:
As me too's don't seem (fortunately) to be discouraged on this list,
I'll add my Congratulations; great image.
Me, too!!
ERNR
===
Ditto. Lots of nice detail and texture.
]
Sendt: 10. februar 2006 15:06
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters
keep missing the point that I wrote Marco
and was planning on participating? Stop acting like I was not.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner
: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With apologies to Mark
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:04:07 -0600
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
What I don't understand is the ridicule I received from you and at
least one other on the list
On 11/2/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nobody's listening. I gave up on this thread a while ago, and suggest you
do likewise. There's not a scrap of evidence that any regular PDMLer
wrote rude messages, but people are rushing about saying we should
apologise to Pentax.
In that case I aoplogize for innocent people being killed in Iraq. It's
partly my fault...
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner
People weren't listening all along. :-)
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With a
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:00:29 -
Tom,
Nobody's
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:17:39 -, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nobody's listening. I gave up on this thread a while ago, and suggest
you
do likewise. There's not a scrap of evidence that any regular PDMLer
wrote rude messages, but
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy who did it owns up. If I have to
keep the whole school here all day, I will. And if I hear another word out
of you you'll be in detention every weekend, including
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:34:44 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy who did it owns up. If I have
to
keep the whole school here all day, I will. And if I hear
John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:34:44 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy who did it owns up. If I
have to
keep the whole school here all day, I will.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:15:38 -, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:34:44 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With a
Matron will put some ointment on.
You're right. There's always a silver lining.
You Brits seem to have raised being spanked by a middle aged
Boris Liberman wrote:
Tom, Bill, don't you agree that it cannot possibly *really* hurt any of
you (or any of the fellow PDMLers) if you gave few 800x600 med-high
quality JPGs to Marco... Really, guys, put the legalistics aside and
think of it...
The grand total time we spent arguing this out
On 2/11/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
There are so many things you should apologize for, Cotty.
This is a good start.
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 2/11/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In that case I aoplogize for innocent people being killed in Iraq. It's
partly my fault...
Only partly?
g,dr
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I didn't really apologize, I aoplogized. :-)
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With a
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:25:36 -0500
On 2
C.
From: Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With apologies to Mark
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:49:22 +0930
Boris Liberman wrote:
Tom, Bill, don't you
On 11 Feb 2006 at 19:23, frank theriault wrote:
On 2/11/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
There are so many things you should apologize for, Cotty.
This is a good start.
I vote for Cotty as official PDML apologist, and he who doth not wear Pentax
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters degree, just had a
photo contest and I won first prize with this one. I'm not sure if I get
anything
Great shot, beautiful light, rich tonality. Congratulations on your
well-deserved win.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of
What he said! Very nice, congrats.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 8:07 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
Great shot, beautiful light, rich tonality
Congrats, Mark! Beautiful photo.
On 2/10/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters degree, just had a
Congratulations Mr Roberts.
Never underestimate the value of bragging rights
Dave
On 2/10/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm
Mark,
Congratulation! Extremely nice textures and processing. Sepia is great
choice.
A small thing I suppose, but I especially like your close attention
paid to the borders.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
Wonderful shot. Congratulations!
dk
On 2/10/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Congratulation! Extremely nice textures and processing. Sepia is great
choice.
A small thing I suppose, but I especially like your close attention
paid to the borders.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL
Wondeful shot Mark!
Gee why worry about the copyright notice? It's just a small .jpg.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:05:31 -0500
Some
Good work Mark. Thats a beautiful photo, well composed with astounding
light and character. Well composed. Makes me feel like I'm there. I
want to see whats on the other side!
Mark Roberts wrote:
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The
This luddite rejoices. Nice shot, and the sepia doesn't look like
a fix.
-Lon
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters degree, just had a
On 2/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great shot, beautiful light, rich tonality. Congratulations on your
well-deserved win.
I concur with Paul.
I'd love to see this one all blowed up, and not on a computer screen.
It must look amazing!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Very, very well done. Great subject, composition execution.
Is the posting full frame?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
A small thing I suppose, but I especially like your close attention
paid to the borders.
No, I'd call it finishing the image.
The mark of a pro.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
Mark
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very, very well done. Great subject, composition execution.
Is the posting full frame?
Yep. As much as I could squeeze out of the frame :)
For shots like this it's really nice to have the grid focusing screen in
the 645. I bought one off eBay a couple
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great shot, beautiful light, rich tonality. Congratulations on your
well-deserved win.
I concur with Paul.
I'd love to see this one all blowed up, and not on a computer screen.
It must look
Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wondeful shot Mark!
Gee why worry about the copyright notice?
I haven't put one on that photo yet but I usually do in order to
indicate wait for the answer here... who the copyright owner is.
It's just a small .jpg.
Which is why I have no qualms about
Mark Roberts wrote:
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters degree, just had a
photo contest and I won first prize with this one. I'm not
Mark Roberts wrote:
Wondeful shot Mark!
Gee why worry about the copyright notice?
I haven't put one on that photo yet but I usually do in order to
indicate wait for the answer here... who the copyright owner is.
It's just a small .jpg.
Which is why I have no qualms about putting it on
As me too's don't seem (fortunately) to be discouraged on this
list, I'll add my Congratulations; great image.
Keith McG
Mark Roberts wrote:
Some of you may have seen this in my collection of UK vacation photos
from last summer. The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University,
Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As me too's don't seem (fortunately) to be discouraged on this
list, I'll add my Congratulations; great image.
Thanks Keith, I appreciate it.
I just learned an additional bit of the backstory for this photo (in
addition to what's on my PESO page). I
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
What I don't understand is the ridicule I received from you and at least
one other on the list when I suggested that Pentax Canada did not follow
the normal protocol I would have expected
Keith McGuinness wrote:
As me too's don't seem (fortunately) to be discouraged on this list,
I'll add my Congratulations; great image.
Me, too!!
ERNR
Mark Roberts wrote:
... The Office of International Programs at Duquesne
University, where I'm currently working on my masters degree,
Hi!
What I don't understand is the ridicule I received from you and at
least one other on the list when I suggested that Pentax Canada did
not follow the normal protocol I would have expected.
As has been explained to you at least as often as you have brought the
point up is that this was
On 6/7/05, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-06-06, at 22:51, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
he wants btw. a nice
lens, it's not very clear for me but it seems his choices are the FA
35 f/2 or the F(? is that correct, or Jessops screwed the codes and
it's in fact the
Hi!
Guess what... I was wandering around my favourite forums, when I've
saw this: a fellow Romanian who took the 1st place at a photography
contest. That't not all: guess what was the prize...
an *istDS, no more or less! And a 250l voucher - he wants btw. a nice
lens, it's not very clear for me
On 2005-06-06, at 22:51, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
he wants btw. a nice
lens, it's not very clear for me but it seems his choices are the FA
35 f/2 or the F(? is that correct, or Jessops screwed the codes and
it's in fact the FA?)28-105 f/3.2-4.5. Both black. What do you think?
(I'll
85 matches
Mail list logo
