On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 08:52:26 +0200, Marjan Vrban wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:25:14 + (UTC), Valent Turkovic wrote:
[7 quoted lines suppressed]
Možda je ovo već postojeće rješenje za uske ulice, staze...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:25:14PM +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Što više razmišljam o tagiranju uskih, srednjih i širokih ulica naših
primorskih mjesta sve više mislim da bi trebali skoro svi biti pedestrian.
Pa one koje su dovoljno uske da auto ne moze proci kroz njih definitivno ne
bi
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 08:52:26AM +0200, Marjan Vrban wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:25:14 + (UTC), Valent Turkovic wrote:
m funkciju tih ulica imaju skoro istu kao glavna ulica, i u
njima se nalaze trgovine, restorani, kafići, jedino je šira od glavne
ulice. Ne vidim razlog da se
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:22:23PM +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
Što se tiče rendera, nemoguće je napraviti da je dobar za aute i
bicikle/pješake istovremeno. Mapnik očito više pogoduje autima, makar bi
autima bilo bolje da se highway-pedestrian isto crta crtkano, jer je njima
svejedno gdje se
Ne znam kako bih odredio granicu kopiranja informacije. Recimo da imam
knjigu u kojoj imam ucrtane nekakve kote. U knjizi piše Sva prava
pridržana. Recimo da mogu precrtati kote i pravit se grbav, nije da me mogu
uhvatiti. Ali što ako nisam baš siguran u kote, i onda odlučim upisati tag
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:11:39PM +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
Ne znam kako bih odredio granicu kopiranja informacije. Recimo da imam
knjigu u kojoj imam ucrtane nekakve kote. U knjizi piše Sva prava
pridržana.
To bi čak i pravnom laiku trebali biti prilično jasno i nedvosmisleno da ne
smije
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:16:41PM +0200, Ivan Biuklija wrote:
Dana Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:30:07 +0200, Marjan Vrban
Koliko bi ovakve situacije kršile nečija autorska prava, s obzirom na
to da nisam iskopirao položaj ulice, a naziv ulice je javni podatak
koji bi po svim pravilima trebao biti
Monday, August 23, 2010, 2:00:38 AM, Matija Nalis wrote:
Ne bih znao, treba ih pitati. Ako se nekome da, mogu vidjeti kako sam ja
pitao za postanske brojeve na
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HR:Copyright
pa pitati tako ili slicno i javiti na listu da su to napravili i koje su
rezultati
Liz,
You asked about the early intent of the Contributor Terms before they were
re-written by legal counsel. As promised:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes or directly
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1lVQlsnuEKPY2gjspScwHqgmo8RyoqmuaWWmWh58T4TY
0.1
At 10:46 AM 14/08/2010, Rob Myers wrote:
On 08/14/2010 07:33 AM, Liz wrote:
If you believe, like many data donors, that the attribution must be preserved,
then a licence which incorporates the viral provisions is necessary.
The ODbL does incorporate attribution. From a given work you can find
- Original Message -
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org;
Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY is compatible with ODbL/CT?
(Was
At 05:50 PM 22/08/2010, David Groom wrote:
Intent:
(1) Section 4 always was intended to allow and encourage governmental
organisation imports that require attribution under the standard terms
without need for derogation.
(2) Maintain maximum flexibility for future choices. The license used in
- Original Message -
From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY-SA is compatible with ODbL - a
philosophical point
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:44 PM,
Hi,
I'm sort of sick of allegations that what I say and do in the
community is somehow tainted by myself doing business in OSM. Here's a
quote from talk a while ago:
Chris Browet wrote:
The fact that many key players (SteveC, Frederik, Richard(?)) in the
project also have commercial
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.netwrote:
- Original Message - From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY-SA is
I can't speak for Chris, but you don't make me nervous because you're quite
open and you don't drive any issues that may have business implications.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm sort of sick of allegations that what I say and do in the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't speak for Chris, but you [Frederik] don't make me nervous because
you're quite
open and you don't drive any issues that may have business implications.
He doesn't make me nervous, but I wouldn't want him (or anyone
On 22/08/2010 15:27, Mike Collinson wrote:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes or directly
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1lVQlsnuEKPY2gjspScwHqgmo8RyoqmuaWWmWh58T4TY
0.1
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=18q0b_f_-rtuWWC04qaAcO3NY_Aob2QjY2gGRMmo0IrM
0.2
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:58 PM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 22/08/2010 15:27, Mike Collinson wrote:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes or directly
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1lVQlsnuEKPY2gjspScwHqgmo8RyoqmuaWWmWh58T4TY
0.1
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
That's an open question for the lawyer that wrote the CT. In casual
conversation with one lawyer (casual as in I wasn't paying the
lawyer) I was told that legal-English is not FORTRAN and the or is not
required for
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a
future without Odbl. So let's do our best to convince as many mappers as
possible to not accept Odbl, reopen registration to people who want to
contribute under CCBYSA2.0 terms, and put pressure on OSMF and others to
tell them
On Sunday 22 August 2010, Felix Hartmann wrote:
This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get the
usernames/passwords copied so people can login to the CCBYSA 2.0 fork
without new registration.
How about you start with your own mailing lists?
robert.
On 22.08.2010 12:26, Robert Scott wrote:
On Sunday 22 August 2010, Felix Hartmann wrote:
This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get the
usernames/passwords copied so people can login to the CCBYSA 2.0 fork
without new registration.
How about you start with your own mailing
More talk from the folk who would rather brush everyone else's concerns
under the carpet I see? I seriously look on OSM in despair at the moment
with comments like that.
Jeni
On 22/08/2010 11:26, Robert Scott wrote:
How about you start with your own mailing lists?
Felix,
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a future
without Odbl. So let's do our best to convince as many mappers as
possible to not accept Odbl, reopen registration to people who want to
contribute under CCBYSA2.0 terms, and put pressure on
On 22 August 2010 20:58, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
This is not a good starting position for a fork. I'd rather have somone do
it who doesn't do it out of blind protest and political propaganda.
License disputes is one of the more common reasons for forks to occur.
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a
future without Odbl. So let's do our best to convince as many mappers
as possible to not accept Odbl, reopen registration to people who want
to contribute under CCBYSA2.0 terms, and put pressure on OSMF
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
This is not a good starting position for a fork. I'd rather have somone do
it who doesn't do it out of blind protest and political propaganda.
License disputes is one of the more common reasons for forks to occur.
Yes, but it can be done clear-headed and without
On Sunday 22 August 2010, Jenny Campbell wrote:
everyone else's concerns
You are trying to make it sound like there are a huge number of people that
agree with you. Perhaps you genuinely believe that. If so I think you are
tremendously mistaken. It is a very vocal minority. There have been
On 22.08.2010 12:58, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Felix,
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a
future without Odbl. So let's do our best to convince as many mappers
as possible to not accept Odbl, reopen registration to people who
want to contribute
On 22 August 2010 21:09, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Yes, but it can be done clear-headed and without hatred. They want this, we
Considering how heated the debate over the license is, do you
seriously think this won't happen on similar topics as well?
want that, ok we do our
On 22 August 2010 21:12, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
On Sunday 22 August 2010, Jenny Campbell wrote:
everyone else's concerns
You are trying to make it sound like there are a huge number of people that
agree with you. Perhaps you genuinely believe that. If so I think you are
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get the
usernames/passwords copied so people can login to the CCBYSA 2.0 fork
without new registration.
If you must fork, fork the data (planet.osm),
Le dimanche 22 août 2010 à 13:08, Florian Heer a écrit :
This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get the
usernames/passwords copied so people can login to the CCBYSA 2.0 fork
without new registration.
I think this could be a real problem. Because I for one do not agree
On 22 August 2010 22:06, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Although my login informations in OSM are not very sensible, I expect them
to be reasonably confidential and only accessible to a few administrators.
I have no problem if the data I contributed is copied by [one or
Am 22.08.2010 14:06, schrieb Renaud MICHEL:
I have no problem if the data I contributed is copied by [one or multiple]
fork (that's why a full history dump has been created, cf
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/full-experimental/ ), but as those forks
would be different projects I expect the
Hi,
forgive my ignorance, but are the licenses not some how compatible?
I mean the work has been done up to now under ccsa20 and compatible license.
So that means that the new license allows data from ccsa20 to be
ported over, right?
or do you need the permission of the new authors?
if people want
I don't think making passwords publicly available is a good idea, but
it might be a sign of good faith on OSM(F)'s behalf if it were to
facilitate an easy method for people waiting to claim their
account/edits on a forked database.
I hope you are kidding... When someone signed-up at OSM there
My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are agreeing to
the current new license, but you are also agreeing in advance to any future
license changes, without being able to know what those new license terms will
be. It is the equivalent to voting someone into office as
This is also one of my concerns, especially when using imports. I
don't think this has been discussed at all well.
Cheerio John
On 22 August 2010 09:13, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are agreeing
to the current new
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:13 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are agreeing
to the current new license, but you are also agreeing in advance to any
future license changes, without being able to know what those new
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
This is also one of my concerns, especially when using imports. I
don't think this has been discussed at all well.
The issue of imports and data has been discussed at length in places
like the US where imports are a big
2010/8/22 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
This is also one of my concerns, especially when using imports. I
don't think this has been discussed at all well.
The issue of imports and data has been discussed at
On 22/08/2010 14:13, John F. Eldredge wrote:
My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are
agreeing to the current new license, but you are also agreeing in
advance to any future license changes, without being able to know
what those new license terms will be. It is the
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a future
without Odbl.
If you do that, please do it on your own servers, mailing lists, and
community, and with your own new project name, as a real fork of any
project should do.
Robert Kaiser
Hi everyone!
As I'm interested in keeping my data within OSM and find a common
ground with rest of you, I'm delighted to see that requests to specify
'free and open license' in CT section 3 has been taken into
account[1]. Huge thanks and sorry for any emotional storm it have
caused.
[1]
According to the summaries that have been published thus far, those who click
yes are licensing data already entered not only under the current new
license, but are agreeing in advance to any future licenses. You won't have
the right to choose not to license the data under those new licenses,
On 22 August 2010 13:08, Florian Heer florianheerf...@yahoo.de wrote:
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a future
without Odbl. So let's do our best to convince as many mappers as possible
to not accept Odbl, reopen registration to people
I am not against a fork,
but as Frederik already mentioned, there is no to debate about a fork and
spread anti-odbl propaganda. There are other good reasons to fork, for me
one of them is getting a more distributed database instead of everything in
a single farm on a single location.
I would not
talk@ is not the place for acrimonious posts about the license like this
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-August/053323.html
Both sides have had their say in the Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA
2.0continuation thread.
Please, when responding to that thread now
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a future
without Odbl.
If you do that, please do it on your own servers, mailing lists, and
community, and with your own new project
Chris Browet wrote[1]:
The fact that many key players (SteveC, Frederik, Richard(?)) in the
project also have commercial interests in the OSM data
Wut?
I don't have any commercial interest in OSM, at all. I'm a magazine editor.
We do have maps in our magazine but we (well, I) make them
Le dimanche 22 août 2010 à 14:13, vous avez écrit :
If, after some though, I decide I prefer to work on a fork, then I will
create a new account there, possibly using the same user name if it is
still available, or a new one.
I don't think making passwords publicly available is a good
Le dimanche 22 août 2010 à 16:58, Milo van der Linden a écrit :
- Changing from mysql to postgresql/postgis as the core database
This one has already been done during the API 0.6 switch, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers/smaug
So this is actually a reason to fork for the pro-mysql
Anthony schrieb:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a future
without Odbl.
If you do that, please do it on your own servers, mailing lists, and
community, and with your
John F. Eldredge schrieb:
According to the summaries that have been published thus far, those who click
yes are licensing data already entered not only under the current new
license, but are agreeing in advance to any future licenses. You won't have the right to
choose not to license the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 17:21, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Chris Browet wrote[1]:
The fact that many key players (SteveC, Frederik, Richard(?)) in the
project also have commercial interests in the OSM data
Wut?
I don't have any commercial interest in OSM, at all. I'm a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 22-08-10 18:04, Renaud MICHEL schreef:
Le dimanche 22 août 2010 à 16:58, Milo van der Linden a écrit :
- Changing from mysql to postgresql/postgis as the core database
This one has already been done during the API 0.6 switch, see
Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com writes:
As I'm interested in keeping my data within OSM and find a common
ground with rest of you, I'm delighted to see that requests to specify
'free and open license' in CT section 3 has been taken into
account[1]. Huge thanks and sorry for any emotional
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:13 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think making passwords publicly available is a good idea, but
it might be a sign of good faith on OSM(F)'s behalf if it were to
facilitate an easy method for people waiting to claim their
account/edits on a
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com mailto:extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get the
usernames/passwords copied so people can login to the CCBYSA 2.0
fork
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
When I signed up for an account with OSM I didn't realize that my account
information was going into a database that was also CCBYSA.
It's not. This is just the dream of the forkers and then lots of
random commenters.
-
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
When I signed up for an account with OSM I didn't realize that my account
information was going into a database that was also CCBYSA.
It wasn't, although arguably, the entire database (including
usernames, passwords, and
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com mailto:extremecar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get
http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2008/11/21/replacement-garmin-etrex-bike-clip/
may be relevant.
Shaun
On 22 Aug 2010, at 21:42, Steve Chilton wrote:
My new week old Garmin etrex Vista HCx is causing me grief.
The power on/off button has decided to not function at all.
Am
My new week old Garmin etrex Vista HCx is causing me grief.
The power on/off button has decided to not function at all.
Am thinking I will have to go to Garmin to resolve it (it was purchased from
Amazon).
Anyone had this issue with theirs?
Anyone with good (or bad) experiences of going to Garmin
Steve,
My old eTrex Legend packed in completely and Garmin fixed it ok under the
guarantee - pretty quick turn around from what I remember.
The Zoom out button is playing up on my newer one and I am trying to decide
what to do about it because it is well out of guarantee now - I may have to
Around January someone, I think it was Mark Burton, built a Garmin map
for the Openseamap guys. It covered the southern half of the Baltic Sea.
It had different symbol styles for all the seamarks (buoys etc.), a nice
white background for the sea and a light brown background for the land
areas. To
Felix Hartmann wrote:
As I stated, my goal is to have OSM to continue under CCBYSA2.0
As I see it CCBYSA is not a goal but a tool. Before asking us to work with
- and to give our new data to - your project, it would be fair to tell us
what your real goals are. Then ask some layers if CCBYSA is
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
2. Much more stringent requirements are put on lots of projects
You may have heard of the GNU project. Are you aware that all
contributors to GNU project must sign over not just license
agreements, but copyright assignments?
Just this week a
On 22/08/2010 21:42, Steve Chilton wrote:
My new week old Garmin etrex Vista HCx is causing me grief.
The power on/off button has decided to not function at all.
Am thinking I will have to go to Garmin to resolve it (it was purchased from
Amazon).
Possibly, but I think that it should be the
Chris Browet wrote:
The fact that many key players (SteveC, Frederik, Richard(?)) in the
project also have commercial interests in the OSM data also make me
nervous and doubtful.
looking at Frederik this statement sounds offending to me! HINT: I don't
want to comment on the other persons
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Finally, as ever, I want to make it clear that it's not our place as a
company to try and direct or influence the direction of OSM. That's for the
community and OSMF to debate and decide.
I disagree. NearMap is part of the
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
But every opinions should have a place to voice themselves, shouldn't they?
No. Not all opinions are helpful. And certainly, sheer volume of
opinions is unhelpful.
If Talk becomes moderated/censured, where would that be?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:55 PM, NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
- Why don't we disable that Live edit feature for good? I vaguely remember
the question has been raised before, but I just can't think of any use case
where I' need to mess up the data directly with no undo.
I only ever use the
Zo'n paaltje is
barrier=bollard
en wordt dan ook gerenderd op de slippy map.
'bicycle=yes' is dan niet nodig.
Je zou 'motorcycle=yes' er bij kunnen zetten als die toegestaan zijn.
'access=permissive' gaat over toegankelijke prive-wegen en heeft hier dus
niet mee te maken.
Peter
Op 21 augustus
Andre Engels wrote:
Zoals al gemeld, barrier=bollard, en dan eventueel
voertuigtype=yes/no. Default voor een bollard is access=no, foot=yes,
bicycle=yes (dus: fietsers en voetgangers kunnen erlangs, andere
weggebruikers niet).
Niet akkoord: default voor bollard is al het smal verkeer, i.e.
Ja, ondanks de dreigende luchten met 14 man. IMO goede opkomst :)
Artikel op blog:
http://blog.openstreetmap.nl/index.php/2010/08/22/mapping-party-utrecht-groot-success/
Verder heeft ZMWandelaar ons allen uitgenodigd om, in tegenstelling tot
de vieze stadsgeuren, frisse boslucht in te snuiven
Met dit weer heb ik de utrecht party maar laten zitten,
er was daar toch niet zoveel te doen wat ik aardig vindt.
Gister wel wezen fietsen in o.a de albasserwaard.
http://openfietskaart.nl/?zoom=13lat=51.87325lon=4.71604layers=BTTF
Wat is het daar een rommeltje met de fietsroutes.
De 2de MappingParty zal gehouden worden in Putten op de Veluwe.
In een prachtige omgeving heeft de gemeente twee nieuwe wijkjes laten
bouwen: Husslerveld en Bijsteren.
Op OSM is het een gapend gat die we deze dag gaan opvullen.
We willen toch niet dat G. op dat punt beter is dan OSM?
Ik
Howdy,
Om dan eindelijk de daad bij het word te voegen een mapping party in
Purmerend. In de Weidevenne [1] wel te verstaan. Een beetje kort dag misschien
maar anders zou het pas ergens eind Oktober worden.
Wat gaat er gebeuren:
* Mappen nieuwbouwwijk ten noord-oosten van de Laan de
On Sunday 22 August 2010 21:15:05 ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
wrote:
Met dit weer heb ik de utrecht party maar laten zitten,
er was daar toch niet zoveel te doen wat ik aardig vindt.
Het was heerlijk weer. Lekker op een terras zitten nabuurten.
Gister wel wezen fietsen in
In NSW you can often check up unformed roads on council web sites. There
are oodles of them shown in Google that don't currently exist in
reality. Compare
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8hq=ll=-33.777168,150.627912spn=0.006269,0.009645z=17
with
Hi all,
Sorry if you have already gotten this via the Aust-NZ OSGeo list.
Thought some of you maybe interested in coming along and helping out
at the CrisisCamp being organized at UNSW Sydney on the weekend of 4-5
Sept.
An enterprising team of volunteers and organisational supporters such
as
On 22/08/10 19:34, Richard Cantwell wrote:
Now there's an idea. The area around UCD is pretty well mapped, but
I'm sure there are plenty of POI's etc. that could be added.
The producer of the Phantom FM radio show that I was interviewed about
OSM on (available here:
Sou de Porto Alegre, e gostaria de participar do
grupo de mapeadores daqui, aprender mais, se existir este
grupo
uma abrao
Mauro Borowsky
Em 17/08/2010 08:00, talk-br-requ...@openstreetmap.org escreveu:
Send Talk-br mailing list
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Aber vielleicht kannst Du mal schauen, warum dein Mailclient derzeit
wieder auf Vollquote arbeitet, sogar inklusive der
Mailingslisten-Footer.
Das liegt an der Tastatur, genauso wie die prellenden Tasten bei
Ausrufe- und Fragezeichen und das Leerzeichen davor.
hth
Am Samstag, den 21.08.2010, 03:47 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hannemann:
Hallo Christian,
[...]
Das ist genau das was FT macht, wenn aus der privaten Datenbank
gearbeitet wird und das laden in die OSM Daten Bank nur Alibi-Funktion
hat. Denn sagt ja selbst: Es wird entschieden was zu OSM
Hallo,
On Sunday 22 August 2010 04:30:32 Tirkon wrote:
Ich meinte eigentlich eine Lösung für alle - auch ohne Kenntnis von
Computerchinesisch - auf der Hauptseite des Projektes www.osm.org.
Selbst wenn der Maßstab nicht genau ist. Aber eine Abschätzung, ob
eine Strecke etwa 100 Meter oder 1
Hallo,
die Grenzen unseres Gemeindegebiets wurden von jemandem vor Jahren schon
grob vereinfacht eingezeichnet. Verständlicherweise, weil Feldwege, an
denen die Grenze verläuft, gefehlt haben.
Kann ich, sobald die nötigen Wege da sind, die Grenze nach einer
amtlichen Karte übertragen?
Am Samstag, den 21.08.2010, 16:42 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hannemann:
Hallo Mario,
[...]
das klingt bei dir so, als würdest du auf eine Delegation von
(gewählten/ernannten?) Entscheidungsträgern warten? Auch fänds ichs schon
deine Perspektive des gegenseitig Kaputtmachens erzählt zu
Am Sonntag, den 22.08.2010, 03:37 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hannemann:
Hallo Martin,
[...]
Das Problem ist, dass nicht jeder Leuchturm bei Tage (also als Landmarke) von
See aus gut zu erkennen ist. So stehen einige wie z.B. der Leuchtturm Buk zu
weit im Landesinneren um noch als Landmarke
Ich hab mal hier ganz kurz ein paar Punkte hingeschrieben, die wir uns
anschauen sollten, um einen Fork aufzusetzen, und somit Druck auf die
OSMF auszuueben, die Odbl abzublasen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ccbysa_fork
Statt nur zu meckern sollten wir Taten folgen lassen um die
Hallo zusammen,
hab gerade das neue Fahrradrouting von ORS ausprobiert und muss
sagen, dass ich beeindruckt bin.
Auf mein Standardweg hier (ca. 10km) wir genau die Route
vorgeschlagen, die ich immer fahre und die auf langjähriger Erfahrung
beruht. Endlich keine zwanghafte Benutzung großer
Felix Hartmann wrote on 22.08.2010 12:10:
Ich hab mal hier ganz kurz ein paar Punkte hingeschrieben, die wir uns
anschauen sollten, um einen Fork aufzusetzen, und somit Druck auf die
OSMF auszuueben, die Odbl abzublasen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ccbysa_fork
Wo muss ich
Moin Olaf,
Olaf Hannemann schrieb:
P.S. Bitte antworte demnächst doch bitte nur an die Mailingliste und nicht
zusätzlich an mich als pm.
Du resp. Dein Mail-Client fordert den Antwortenden explizit dazu auf,
beim 'normalen' Antworten zusätzlich eine Mail direkt an Dich zu senden,
auch ohne
On 22.08.2010 12:56, Sebastian Masch wrote:
Felix Hartmann wrote on 22.08.2010 12:10:
Ich hab mal hier ganz kurz ein paar Punkte hingeschrieben, die wir uns
anschauen sollten, um einen Fork aufzusetzen, und somit Druck auf die
OSMF auszuueben, die Odbl abzublasen.
Am 22.08.2010 13:20, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
Dass kannst du nicht, solange der Fork unter CCBYSA steht.
da Daten von der CC nicht abgedeckt werden, sind meine Daten nach
Deutschem (EU-) Recht eigentlich garnicht oder nur für OSM lizensiert. ^^
bin gespannt was dabei rauskommt.
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Ich hab mal hier ganz kurz ein paar Punkte hingeschrieben, die wir uns
anschauen sollten, um einen Fork aufzusetzen, und somit Druck auf die
OSMF auszuueben, die Odbl abzublasen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ccbysa_fork
Statt nur zu meckern sollten wir Taten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Manuel
Am 22.08.2010 11:51, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
Kann ich, sobald die nötigen Wege da sind, die Grenze nach einer
amtlichen Karte übertragen? Grenzverläufe sind ja wohl hoffentlich
nicht geschützt...
Die Grenzverläufe selbst sind nicht
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
