You are right. It was Jones Beene. My apologies.
AA
On 4/3/2017 5:41 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
Once again - mistaken identity. I made no such pledge.
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, A
Eric,
Agreed self driving trucks will be a few years off. They won't dump
fairly new ones and a retrofit may not be worth it. - but coming. Did
you see Dubai is planning to start a pilotless drone taxi service this
Summer? http://www.ehang.com/ehang184
It looks like changing things that
!
*From:* Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:38 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:33 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wro
Che,
Have you ever done anything apart from bitch about others failings?
Well. do tell us.
AA
On 4/2/2017 4:38 PM, Che wrote:
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:33 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
See http://www.e-catworld.com/w
I hope others watch the following videos of the Atlas series of robots too.
Imagine what the next generation will be like powered by LENR instead of
batteries.
AA
On 4/2/2017 12:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Here is the latest Boston Dynamics robot:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7xvqQeoA8c
has cost Science a great deal.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
It has been evident for years that Rossi has been spending time
boning up on atomic physics.
What he writes here makes
on quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:01 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Axil,
So you say, and I don't mean that disparagingly. I don't k
-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:36 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Axil,
I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller
particles. They seem to be more a matter of the
On 4/1/2017 6:42 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
That's philosophy of relativity. And that's from the 70's, not long
after it was inventive. Moreover, you don't need to know particle
physics to study relativity.
2017-04-01 16:39 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a
snarky. I am just stating something evident. And
you seem to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong
with IH "evidences".
2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>:
Why be so snarky?
and I think all is wrong with IH
"evidences".
2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>:
Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that.
Jumping to conclusions on such flimsy evidence does
Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to
conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing for your credibility.
AA
On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of particle
physics. He probably learned about
It has been evident for years that Rossi has been spending time boning
up on atomic physics.
What he writes here makes sense to me, but perhaps others here, more
expert than me, will comment.
1.
Andrea Rossi
March 31, 2017 at 12:55 PM
e done with old equipments, if not kitchen devices,
sometime manipulated by experienced scientists, and sometime just by
hobbyists.
Time for spring cleaning.
2017-03-29 23:32 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>:
I view post modern
of the French
https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french-intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/
I have the subtle impression some of us live in an information bubble...
Is it me?
2017-03-29 18:14 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a
A
On 3/28/2017 4:00 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
Beene,
What makes you think that is Rossi?
Or do you just lap up fake news?
AA
On 3/28/2017 3:43 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
For anyone needing a smile (and don't we all?) an amazing mystery
image of the reinvented-inventor has appeared on lenr-forum.com .
Beene,
What makes you think that is Rossi?
Or do you just lap up fake news?
AA
On 3/28/2017 3:43 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
For anyone needing a smile (and don't we all?) an amazing mystery
image of the reinvented-inventor has appeared on lenr-forum.com ...
Beene,
You don't get to order me not to comment.
As I said, it it probably better for you to insult those who are not
here to answer you. Otherwise they might show up your "palpable ignorance,"
AA
On 3/28/2017 12:45 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
a.ashfield wrote:
I confirm that I am
Beene,
I confirm that I am not being paid by anybody. If you think my English
is the same as Rossi's you need your head examined.
I have not said I KNOW if the E-Cat works, despite your claim. I have
consistently said "Wait and see." II think it probably does work.
Unlike you I don't
He should be posting
to Rossi's sock-puppet blog - where his views will be appreciated.
Brian Ahern wrote:
I may be arrogant when it comes to Mills, Rossi and Godes, but I did
not comment on capacitors.
----
*Fro
ing
to Rossi's sock-puppet blog - where his views will be appreciated.
Brian Ahern wrote:
I may be arrogant when it comes to Mills, Rossi and Godes, but I did
not comment on capacitors.
--------
*From:* a.ashfield
Brian,
Ne
but I did
not comment on capacitors.
----
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Monday, March 27, 2017 9:48 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?
Brian,
N
rallel with this
effort. My impression is that they treat the PEV's as expensive
equipment that used
wrongly could stall the development. But you are right that if these
risks are small and if adding the PEV are a simple add-on then why not
buy a Tesla
and have some fun.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:19 PM, a.as
strate it operating.
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, March 26, 2017 8:19 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?
Supposedly the plasm
the voltage vs. temp to a standard. I
would like the same assurance for alternative thermocouple types too.
I also need lead wires to the junction of about 40".
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:09 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Bob
Bob,
What do you want the thermocouples for? ie what temperature?
I have never used Niobium - Iridium thermocouples in the glass
industry. We always used type S, and type B for more stable results
over years duration, for things like furnace crowns at 1550C, but this
had the disadvantage of
is relegating himself into the same
class of pseudo-science as Rossi: hyped un-demonstrated science.
He shows pretty stuff, but the data is never published, and then
he moves on to something else.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, a.ashfield
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net <m
ience. He shows
pretty stuff, but the data is never published, and then he moves on to
something else.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Brian,
He has demonstrated the SunCell to various audienc
n-system-1-4400376
AA
On 3/27/2017 5:38 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
It has never been independently observed, but is often quoted.
If it was true, he could openly demonstrate it operating.
----
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi..
to wait and see without making dogmatic libelous charges. Rossi
was right, people like you will never believe any experiment only the
sale of working commercial units.
AA
On 3/26/2017 9:49 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
a.ashfield wrote:
...Supposedly the plasma is >3500C.
A plasma at 35
ing.
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:19 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?
Brian,
Apart from some calorimetry on the SunCell in the early days, would
you not thi
and failed the investment stream would cease.
----
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, March 26, 2017 11:23 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?
Er
/2017 5:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:49 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
To me it looks like the hand waving is largely from the skeptics.
I have yet to see a specific item that is wrong in Mills theories
To me it looks like the hand waving is largely from the skeptics. I
have yet to see a specific item that is wrong in Mills theories
highlighted by them.
Rossi had it right years ago when he stated the skeptics will never
believe an experiment but only the sale of working commercial units.
pper pipes will lead to a lot of
copper in the water. I have softened water, but it is flowing through
plastic pipes.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 4:43 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Bob,
The Molecular Multi does contain Zinc. I
ing animals, I recognize that with today's marketplace
foods, I would become malnourished by not eating meat. Eating veal is
even more nutrient rich because nutrient absorption by the young
animals is far higher than older animals.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizo
It's easy enough to take a good vitamin supplement like Fgrmulas Inc's
"Molecular Multi"
AA
On 3/18/2017 11:29 AM, H LV wrote:
Good questions.
Lets hope vertical farming is well studied before it becomes common
place or it could become another agricultural folly.
Harry
On Sat, Mar 18,
Jed Rothwell wrote: AFAIK all of our great minds have so far failed to
come to grips with consciousness
The difficulty had been exaggerated. I don't think it is more than the
ability of the brain to put together a 3D image of the local world and
where you are in it. Plus things like sound,
Originally published in World Affairs in January, this has become
available on Lewan's blog.
It is a good summary of the LENR situation with Rossi and the worldwide
implications.
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2017/02/25/world-affairs-cold-fusion-an-impossible-invention/
AA
.
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Saturday, February 25, 2017 12:35 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:On this date ... in 2017?
Brian,
Where can we see the results? Will you be posting them here?
AA
On 2/25/2017 10:14 AM,
Brian,
Where can we see the results? Will you be posting them here?
AA
On 2/25/2017 10:14 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
It is 1;12 aM
wE ARE LOADED, EVACUATED AND READY FOR 30PSI OF h2.
wE WILL SET THE POWER AT 400 WATTS TO BEGIN.
We hope to begin running by 11:30 AM
The wired article is nonsense. True that the entertainment industry
will grow as people have a lot more spare time, but why should it be
mainly in video games? I think it more likely that many will start
very small businesses in order to supplement the government UBI paycheck.
AA
On
Jones,
This seems a typical negative piece from you.
I'm not a lawyer but I understand there are other ways to get the ERV's
report entered as evidence, besides having Penon show up.
Why do you say Rossi would make a bad impression in court? Everyone who
has met him (IH excepted) say he is
Jed,
I thought you said earlier that you had the plumbing layout but were not
allowed to show it. If so, there should be no doubt about whether there
is U in the system.
AA
On 2/20/2017 8:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
There has been some discussion here about the position of the flow
meter
Peter,
Thanks for posting Ed Storms comment. I find it the best summary of the
situation that I have seen so far.
I find the basic problem is with the Patent Office. By making it so
difficult to get patents related to LENR they have prevented the
knowledge from becoming public. Rossi has
Jones,
You have called me a Rossi fan but I have no trouble considering that he
may have used a rare isotope of Ni. That is the point. Nobody knows and
it is better to wait for full information.
It does not seem necessary, at least for relatively low COPs. See this
example of a paper on
Jed,
It looks to me that Bob was repeating my comment. It is impossible to
be sure, one way or the other. that the E-Cat works, without having all
the data. You said I was calling you a liar because of this and stopped
replying to me.
If the instrumentation was so obviously useless on the
Axil,
Have you not seen Rossi's patent?
It doesn't even mention LENR and protects very little.
AA
On 2/18/2017 6:08 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi's IP is protected by a patent so he is covered. It is worthwhile
to verify that that patent is valid.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:05 PM, a.ashfield
Jed, "none of these replicators has succeeded. Not one."
Russian Group Claims Rossi/Parkhomov Replication Success
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/10/05/russian-group-claims-rossiparkhomov-replication-success/
AA
On 2/18/2017 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil
case against Rossi.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:35 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Axil,
I don't think it follows that IH is free to do what they want with
Rossi's IP. If that were the case why would they have agreed to
. It will be refreshing to deal with FACTS that can be verified
or disproved by research. IH paid for that IP and it is theirs to do
with it as they see fit. The licence agreement no longer is binding.
LET US HAVE THE FACTS AND NOTHING BUT THE FACTS.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:44 PM, a.ashfield
de-program the earnest followers.
--------
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 8:11 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-
logic and evidence will be able to
de-program the earnest followers.
----
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 8:11 PM
to expect logic and evidence will be able to de-program
the earnest followers.
----
*From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 8:11 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:How to ov
That is certainly one way of avoiding answering the questions I asked.
You say you have "all the data." It seems very unlikely that IH has all
Rossi's data and so how would you get it?
AA
On 2/17/2017 6:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net &l
not replicate it.
(Show me the exact quotation if they have.)
AA
On 2/17/2017 5:49 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
If indeed you have all the data (which I doubt) . . .
You have no reason to doubt it. You are accusing
Jed,
If indeed you have all the data (which I doubt) please post the much
requested layout of the piping.
AA
On 2/17/2017 2:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
I rather liked Rossi's comment. Discussing t
Jed,
I rather liked Rossi's comment. Discussing the flowmeter on the blogs
before the full information is released in court is about as useful as
discussing the sex of angels.
AA
On 2/17/2017 11:12 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Peter Gluck >
efore the show aired,
the ratings would suffer."
Beats me how you think that is Santilli taking a victim to court.
AA
On 2/3/2017 10:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
I would have thought you could tell the d
Jones,
I don't find it incredible that you believe any bad fake news you can
find on Rossi.
According to what I've read the waste was reclassified as toxic
retroactively.
In order to prove your point you need to show a photo copy of the final
sentences and appeals, not the charges. I won't
and you have not been able to find one.
AA
On 2/3/2017 4:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Jed,
It is you who is missing my point. Show me one case where the
fraudster took his victim to court.
It happens
be seen as special. Sadly,
he is not special and no longer qualifies as interesting.
And please stuff the libel crap back where it came from... it derives
from the naive and unhealthy adulation of a con artist.
On 2/3/2017 11:37 AM, a.ashfield wrote:
Jones,
Probably. Probably this and probably
ime in court
proceedings from divorce to business cases.
And it is well known that filing first gives you a psychological
advantage.
So Rossi could have simply anticipated he would be sued so he sued
first.
The fact he filed first is not the proof of anything.
Giovanni
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at
simply anticipated he would be sued so he sued first.
The fact he filed first is not the proof of anything.
Giovanni
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:11 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Jed,
It is you who is missing my point. Show me on
Jed,
It is you who is missing my point. Show me one case where the fraudster
took his victim to court.
That is the last thing a fraudster would want to do, to have all the
facts come out IN COURT.
AA
.
On 2/2/2017 8:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.
I don't recall either of them taking their victims to court.
It was the other way around.
AA
On 2/2/2017 7:54 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
At this point it strikes me that it is extraordinar
ustified in
devising a fraudulent plan, as if the end justifies the means - and
furthermore blaming IH as being partly responsible. Sick.
On 2/2/2017 9:09 AM, a.ashfield wrote:
Jones, contrary to what you wrote, I don't think it matters a damn
whether the customer was real of not. IH fai
Jones, contrary to what you wrote, I don't think it matters a damn
whether the customer was real of not. IH failed to find a customer for
a year and possibly Rossi decided just to find a suitable heat sink.
What matters is how the 1 MW plant performed. Did it really produce 1
MW with a COP of
Jack Ma had the best answer to Tillerson.
“Over the past thirty years, the Americans had thirteen wars spending
40.2 trillion dollars,” said Ma, speaking at the World Economic Forum in
Davos. “What if they spent a part of that money on building up the
infrastructure, helping the white-collar
Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WUlh4c3dJWlh5Rjg/view
From MFMP facebook.
Ooops, I thought I was replying to Mats,and didn't see it was a link
from Vortex.
As Jones Beene points out it is lacking proof. Perhaps the new
experiment they talk about will provide it.
I thought it interesting that they forecast the production of light in
view of what we have hear about
Mats,
Most interesting. This sounds like one of the most plausible theories
to me.
I haven't looked at the figures yet but surely this must lean heavily on
what Rossi has already done?
Adrian
On 1/18/2017 7:43 AM, Mats Lewan wrote:
The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren
6 at 4:38 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Dear Peter,
Thank you for your kind words. I find Amira's voice so beautiful
it moved me to tears.
She became famous on Holland's Got Talent, that she won. Watch
her performance he
beautiful.- great Thank you!
Merry Christmas and surprisingly good new Year 2017!
Peter
,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Merry Christmas. Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
Amira W
Merry Christmas. Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
Amira Willighagen's rendition of Caccini's Ave Maria (11 yrs old)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1X2GW1b3U
Amira Willighagen - "Ave Maria" Gounod Duet (Reykjavík, Iceland) -
Christmas Concert 2015
, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
I think it follows we will have a "conscious" computer even
earlier than Kurzweil forecasts.
I think there are various levels of intelligence. Roughly speaking
Jed,
Thank you for posting the link to that most interesting article.
For some years now I had thought that consciousness was just the brain
making an image of one's surroundings and examining that image. I see
now that is unnecessary, that the brain examines the actual image in
real time and
Do you know of any other solution to the mess? I fear we are in for
more of the same, just with a different slogan.
AA
On 12/12/2016 10:52 AM, Chris Zell wrote:
I read most of your letter and found it articulate.
*From:*a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net]
*Sent:* Monday, December 12
Chris,
I take it you didn't read the piece I linked after your previous comment
AA
On 12/12/2016 10:18 AM, Chris Zell wrote:
During wartime or prison camp conditions, people commonly turn on one
another and slide backwards into predation. I think much of that
fight for survival would be
Axil,
See my letter in the post above
On 12/8/2016 6:46 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/carls-jr-wants-open-automated-location-2016-3
The fast food industry will be automated
For another solution see my letter to the DelcoTimes.
Real change is needed to end this mess
http://www.delcotimes.com/opinion/20161205/letter-to-the-editor-real-change-is-needed-to-end-this-mess
On 12/8/2016 4:26 PM, Chris Zell wrote:
China is the nation to watch as to Communism. I
Jed,
If you read it in context it is obvious.
I don't know the pipe was only half full. You still haven't come up a
layout.
There is no point in rehashing this all again.
AA
On 12/6/2016 2:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net&g
Jed,
Evidence from IH suggests they didn't, but Rossi was the one who
instigated this expensive court case. Do you really think he would do
that, knowing the results would come out, if he didn't believe he had a
case?
On 12/6/2016 1:45 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.as
Both Rossi and the ERV say the plant produced 1 MW. IH says it didn't
Wait for the court case to see who is telling the truth.
On 12/6/2016 10:48 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Here is a photo of the ~80 ori
pay him. IH may have thought they had enough information that they
didn't need Rossi anymore.
IH was misled by Murray who got it wrong. They were caught flat footed
by Rossi's immediate law suit.
On 12/5/2016 11:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.
that
disqualified it, if you recall.
On 12/5/2016 7:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Jed,
Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The
standby reactors were of the old design that you th
Jed,
Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The standby
reactors were of the old design that you think may have worked.
If the four 250 kW units didn't work why did Rossi not use the backups?
As far as is known they were never activated.
On 12/5/2016 5:28 PM, Jed
Last I looked the sea was rising about 2 -3 mm/yr. What makes you think
so much will be flooded?
On 11/26/2016 11:20 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
cities worldwide within 100 miles of the coastline will be underwater
and in need of relocation inland,
You are not paying attention to what has been said. One of the
advantages of UBI is that it will provide money to the people to spend
on things made by robots. Goods manufactured by robots will keep
getting cheaper. The tax paid by manufacturers and service providers
will be about the same
Jed Rothwell wrote:
The big question is: Will the robots themselves be owned by 1% elite,
or controlled the 1%, or will they be like today's personal computers,
owned by everyone, and used by everyone? I predict the latter, and I
also predict the cost will fall because of competition by
, 2016 at 4:26 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Danial,
I don't agree. The output of robots can be taxed in a number of
ways so that the money is distributed to the population Rather
than being something the gover
Ruby,
I agree with Ford. It will have to get worse before our pathetic
government will take the necessary steps.
On 11/25/2016 3:12 PM, Ruby wrote:
QUOTE "It's going to get worse. The inequality will get worse.
There's going to be more anger and social upheaval," said Martin Ford
Jed,
I think for the foreseeable future robots will wear out and the industry
will be more like the car industry where you have to buy a new one every
so many years and it will then have more advanced features. Advanced
robots will not be cheap.
Likewise, the government will still be needed
Danial,
I don't agree. The output of robots can be taxed in a number of ways so
that the money is distributed to the population Rather than being
something the government spends it is something that the population
does. With UBI it is an alternative to socialism. The money is just as
real
Alain,
The problem with what you say is that only a very few do better as a
result of robotics.
As Norbert Weiner (PhD at 17) wrote:three years after the first vacuum
tube computer,
“If we can do anything in a clear and intelligible way, we can do it by
machine. An industrial revolution of
Alain,
I agree with much of what you wrote. Not so sure about a flat tax.
Something more will be required to redistribute the extreme wealth of
the top 1%.
As you say, many will take the opportunity to work, Many small startup
companies. There will be growth in the entertainment business
I'm very glad to see Ontario is thinking about giving UBI a trial. Not
only is a trial needed to see what the snags are, but the concept is so
alien to the GOP that right now they would never consider it. There has
to be some way of taking care of those made unemployed by AI and
robotics. I
Axil,
I too think Mills has something with great promise. I don't know enough
exotic physics to pass judgement on his GUT but it seems he has made
some good points that have not been answered by his critics.
I don't see how you can claim Rossi's reaction would harm nearby
electronics as
There are seven videos at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLw1e-SwMe6eJf4Rr32w2UybIWOJ2cODEQ
You can skip the first two that are basic introductions.
The third video is the longest. In it Mills describes his theories and
then goes on to describe the SunCell in detail.
The fourth video
Che,
On 10/23/2016 5:16 PM, Che wrote:
Will and Ariel Durant. lol. I outgrew that 'Readers' Digest' version
of History shite, decades ago.
The Lessons of History is an introduction and a survey of human history
as a product of the human experience, of man’s essential evolutionary
nature,
1 - 100 of 788 matches
Mail list logo