On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:27:01AM +0200, Adir Abraham wrote: [create the position of "chair of the comptrollers"]
What's the point? speaking as a former comptroller, it was never necessary before and I don't think it's necessary now. If the three comptrollers, who have very little to do as it is, can't even reach agreement between themselves on what (if) something needs to be done... than it probably doesn't need to be done. We don't need more empty titles. [create the position of "general inquisitor"] Even more pointless. You keep trying to set up mechanisms to second guess and one-up the board. I wonder why. [a board member / comptroller won't be able to switch positions] Why not? we've done it several times in the past and it worked quite well. [have a general meeting in the first quarter of every year] Why? it's the board's prerogative. [enlarge the board to 5] We've tried it, it doesn't work quite as well, we don't have enough people running for the position as it is. Best to keep the board small and offload most responsibility to willing volunteers. [have a general discussion] As long as it's time-bounded, sure. Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
