election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • [EM] Why is Bayesian Regret the "Gold Standard" Howard Swerdfeger
  • Re: [EM] Trees and single-winner methods Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Trees and single-winner methods Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Trees and single-winner methods Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Trees and single-winner methods Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Matthew Welland
  • Re: [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Juho
  • Re: [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit ofutility? Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Implementing UncAAO, D2MAC, etc Warren Smith
• [EM] UncDMC Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] UncDMC Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC Chris Benham
  • [EM] All uncovered options may be definitely defeated (was: UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] All uncovered options may be definitely defeated Chris Benham
• [EM] D2MAC Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC Juho
• [EM] Professor Avi Rubin and American Idol election methods Chris Backert
  • Re: [EM] Professor Avi Rubin and American Idol election methods Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Electronic voting in Estonia Juho
• [EM] D2MAC analysis for two factions Jobst Heitzig
• Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] correction to correction Warren Smith
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Warren Smith
  • [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than RangeVoting (corrected) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Juho
  • [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected) Juho
• Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? David Cary
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Juho
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? David Cary
• [EM] Pizza, Utilities, and Majority Criterion David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Pizza, Utilities, and Majority Criterion Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] How much strategy-freeness can be attained? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting Michael Poole
• [EM] But, for FBC, you'd leave ARLO out Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] I still recommend ARLO Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] DAMC (was: MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] DAMC Chris Benham
  • [EM] Fwd: proxies Was Mae West raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: proxies Was Mae West Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] preliminary DAMC comments Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] DAMC Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] DAMC Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] More about why I withdraw power-truncation Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Matthijs van Duin
  • Re: [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Warren Smith
  • [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion Matthijs van Duin
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA Matthijs van Duin
  • Re: [EM] Stronger than LIIA Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Stronger than LIIA Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Stronger than LIIA Matthijs van Duin
  • Re: [EM] Stronger than LIIA Matthijs van Duin
  • Re: [EM] Stronger than LIIA Forest W Simmons
• [EM] This time margins is finished-off! Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] This time margins is finished-off! Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] My definitions can be found at the barnsdle website. Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] very simple email poll Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll Toplak Jurij
  • [EM] very simple email poll Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] very simple email poll Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO defined in plain English Forest W Simmons
• Re: [EM] What is the idal method for sincere voters? Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] weighted voters, success rate heitzig-j
  • Re: [EM] weighted voters, success rate heitzig-j
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy David Cary
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Juho
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] secession Was Re: it's pleocracy, not democracy raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] secession Was Re: it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Juho
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Juho
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Ehiquette David Cary
• [EM] Plurality has 4 times the inequality of voting power Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Set-Voting Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approaches to proposing Approval Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] utilities, Gini, and lotteries Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Juho, unexplanable strategy attitudes Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho, unexplanable strategy attitudes Juho
• [EM] cycle of defeats (sort of) in Zogby poll results Jan Kok
• [EM] UncAAO Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Forest W Simmons
  • [EM] UncAAO Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Forest W Simmons
  • [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Juho
  • [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes. Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes. Juho
  • Re: [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.") Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.") Juho
  • Re: [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.") Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.") Juho
  • Re: [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.") Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.") Juho
  • [EM] Juho--Strategy-resistance Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Juho
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters? David Cary
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] UncAAO Chris Benham
• [EM] Never propose Approval balloting Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria Juho
  • Re: [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria Juho
• [EM] The test could be a criterion Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Complete sincere Nash equilibria test posting Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Complete sincere Nash equilibria test posting Juho
• [EM] The sincere Nash equilibrium test Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho: Your other examples Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho: Your other examples Juho
• [EM] Margins examples Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Margins examples Juho
  • Re: [EM] Margins examples Juho
  • Re: [EM] Margins examples Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination? Warren Smith
• [EM] Proposal Forest W Simmons
• Re: [EM] MCA, MAMPO, etc. Forest W Simmons
• Re: [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum (correcting Ossipoff AGAIN) Warren Smith
• [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum Scott Ritchie

• Earlier messages
• Later messages