election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Juho's example Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho's example Juho
• [EM] MCA, IRNR, IEVS, retraction Warren Smith
• [EM] CW & SU (response to Ossipoff false claims) Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : CW & SU (response to Ossipoff false claims) Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] SU - some understanding Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination? Juho
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination? Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination? raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-partydomination? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-partydomination? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-partydomination? Juho
  • Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to2-partydomination? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CW & SU Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] utility Forest W Simmons
• Re: [EM] five monotonic methods ... Forest W Simmons
• [EM] voting methods Warren Smith
• [EM] MAMPO & MDDA are opposite counterparts Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin, criteria, 22 Feb, 1603 GMT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho reply, 22 Feb., 1548 GMT Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 22 Feb., 1548 GMT Juho
  • [EM] Juho reply, 22 Feb., 1548 GMT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Juho
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] five monotonic methods that choose from the uncovered set Forest W Simmons
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? David Cary
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Fermat-Weber point Warren Smith
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : Re: MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA Kevin Venzke
• [EM] nastier median+L1 counterexample Warren Smith
• [EM] multidimensional medians Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] multidimensional medians Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] multidimensional medians Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Sorry, I accidentally posted Juho reply twice Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rank methods for if SSD is rejected Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rank methods for public proposal Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] five monotonic ways to select winners from the uncovered set Markus Schulze
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT Juho
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT Juho
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT Juho
• [EM] five monotonic ways to select winners from the uncovered set Forest W Simmons
• [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff] Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff] Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff] raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff] Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Kevin criteria reply Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : Kevin criteria reply Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Conversations with Jo-Ann Q. Public Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The list's complete rejection of the poll Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The list's complete rejection of the poll Chris Backert
  • [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] The list's complete rejection of the poll Elisabeth Varin
• [EM] Juho reply Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho reply Juho
• [EM] Warren reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] reply to Heitzig Warren Smith
• [EM] Whoops! Condorcet vis-a-vis L1 distance situation = even worse than I thought Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Whoops! Condorcet vis-a-vis L1 distance situation = even worse than I thought Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] More on city block distance, Condorcet winners, and social-utility maximizers Warren Smith
• [EM] city block distance, Condorcet winners, and social-utility maximizers Warren Smith
• [EM] presidential poll Warren Smith
  • [EM] "Election Methods" vs. "Voting System" ? Chris Backert
• [EM] International invitation Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin & Lomax replies Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Voted ballot Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ballot omission corrected--Kucinich Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Poll addenda Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] EM presidential poll ballot Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] I propose an EM poll Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] EM polls don't need ARLO or power truncation Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Borda reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Dave reply, Feb. 19, 0831 GMT Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Dave reply, Feb. 19, 0831 GMT Dave Ketchum
• [EM] 2008 presidential predictions Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris reply, Feb. 18, 0117 GMT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Dave reply. ARLO and power-truncation. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Dave reply. ARLO and power-truncation. Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Minor corrections to Webster derivation Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Are apportionment academics as incompetent as voting system academics? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Borda and Honest Voters Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Borda and Honest Voters Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] I want to apologize for the cordialilty-lapse. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Chris BC reply Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Juho
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Juho
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Chris BC reply Juho
• [EM] Brief Approval vs RV clarification Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Brief Approval vs RV clarification Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] SSD or Borda for Utopian electorate? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] SSD or Borda for Utopian electorate? Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Easy voting & handcount. Approval vs RV. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Easy voting & handcount. Approval vs RV. Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Lomax SFC & RV reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris's letter revisited Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Chris's letter revisited Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Chris's letter revisited Markus Schulze
• [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Random and systematic Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Chris SFC reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] One more brief answer Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin's SFC objection Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A Voter's Eye View Dave Ketchum
• [EM] A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc. Juho
• Re: [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] typo in comments on Chris's "SFC" Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren reply, 2/13/07, 0838 GMT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Participation reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2nd Lomax reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Lomax reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin, SFC Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : Kevin, SFC Kevin Venzke
• [EM] SFC, condorcet, participation, full support of A>B and B>C at same time Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Warren's SFC example Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SFC[2] Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] SFC[2] Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SFC Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] SFC Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] SFC Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : Re: SFC Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] A Voter's Eye View Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] A Voter's Eye View Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] A Voter's Eye View Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] SFC and Conodrcet "full support of A>B and B>C at same time" Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] SFC and Conodrcet "full support of A>B and B>C at same time" Jobst Heitzig
• Re: [EM] "More Condorcet myths" Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reply to Warren's website Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] more Condorcet mythology and other information Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] more Condorcet mythology and other information Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Condorcet and Participation, Moulin's proof Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet and Participation, Moulin's proof Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet and Participation, Moulin's proof Chris Benham

• Earlier messages
• Later messages