election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, where to send answers to interview questions Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, where to send answers to interview questions robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, answers to interview questions robert bristow-johnson
  • [EM] Burlington versus Aspen in Declaration Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Burlington versus Aspen in Declaration robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Burlington versus Aspen in Declaration Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Burlington versus Aspen in Declaration robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Burlington versus Aspen in Declaration Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, answers to interview questions Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, answers to interview questions Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, answers to interview questions Stéphane Rouillon
  • [EM] Democracy Chronicles, answers to interview questions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Verification of a voting outcome for VoteFair. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Verification of a voting outcome for VoteFair. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Verification of a voting outcome for VoteFair. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Verification of a voting outcome for VoteFair. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Verification of a voting outcome for VoteFair. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Verification of a voting outcome for VoteFair. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Correction for ABucklin2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ABucklin2--Unlimited-rankings generalization of MTA2. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IIDA: IIA and SODA delegation Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] IIDA: IIA and SODA delegation Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] IIDA: IIA and SODA delegation Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] MTA2, better than MTA or MCA. Dave comment. 3-slot ICT. MTA2 strategy. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Condorcet Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Condorcet Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Dave: Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: Improvement on Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Improvement on Approval Dave Ketchum
• [EM] How much does ABucklin improve on Approval? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] How much does ABucklin improve on Approval? Dave Ketchum
• [EM] How does one post an answer on Quora? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] My Quora answer on "What is the root problem in US politics?" [Self-promotion] Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Kristofer: Democrat Tribal Plot MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: Approval-objection answers MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Approval-objection answers Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Approval-objection answers Dave Ketchum
• [EM] E-Petition for Schulze Method S Sosnick
• [EM] E-Petition for the Schulze Method Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] E-Petition for the Schulze Method robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] E-Petition for the Schulze Method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] E-Petition for the Schulze Method robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Approval strategy introduction improvement MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer: The Approval poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: The Approval poll Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: The Approval poll Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Lomax: Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Societal ranking from incomplete pairwise information. (Pinewood derby.) Gervase Lam
• [EM] Jameson: Sure, I basically agree about conditional methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: Sure, I basically agree about conditional methods Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Some Lomax statements that I hadn't gotten to yet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SodaHead online Approval Voting poll Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SodaHead online Approval Voting poll mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] SodaHead online Approval Voting poll Matthew Welland
  • Re: [EM] SodaHead online Approval Voting poll Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] SodaHead online Approval Voting poll Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SodaHead online Approval Voting poll Michael Rouse
• [EM] Lomax reply, 3/17/12 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Societal ranking from incomplete pairwise information. (Pinewood derby.) Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Societal ranking from incomplete pairwise information. (Pinewood derby.) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Societal ranking from incomplete pairwise information. (Pinewood derby.) Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Societal ranking from incomplete pairwise information. (Pinewood derby.) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Lomax reply, 3/16/12 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Lomax reply, 3/15/12 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Quinn, regarding Lomax reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Hashtag #endplurality Jameson Quinn
• [EM] AOC and upside-down chickens Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Lomax reply, 3/14/12 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Lomax reply, 3/14/12 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Lomax reply, 3/14/12 Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Lomax reply, 3/14/12 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] unsubscribe Kelvin T. Leung
• [EM] Popularization article (in French) about the mathematics of democraty Rémi Peyre
  • Re: [EM] Popularization article (in French) about the mathematics of democraty Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Lomax reply 3,/13/12 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Lomax reply 3,/13/12 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Lomax reply, 3/12/12 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Lomax reply, 3/12/12 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Newbie to the list here Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Newbie to the list here Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Newbie to the list here Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Newbie to the list here Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Newbie to the list here Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Notabililty MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Notabililty Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Notabililty Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Approval-Runoff MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Approval-Runoff Andy Jennings
  • [EM] Approval-Runoff Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Approval-Runoff Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Approval-Runoff Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Approval-Runoff Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Approval-Runoff C.Benham
• [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] correction Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] correction Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] correction Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] correction Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] correction Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Missed opportunity, historically Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Obvious Approval advantages. SODA. Approval-Runoff. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Burlington's first post-IRV mayoral election robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Burlington's first post-IRV mayoral election Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Burlington's first post-IRV mayoral election Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Burlington's first post-IRV mayoral election robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Kevin: FBC deleted from electowiki? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kevin: FBC deleted from electowiki? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Kevin: FBC deleted from electowiki? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Bucklin option wrap-up MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Bucklin option wrap-up Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Reply to Lomax MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Reply to Lomax Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] MMPO's problem and proposability. IRV in Burlington. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Better Approval-voting option? Could ABucklin fail FBC? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Better Approval-voting option? Could ABucklin fail FBC? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Better Approval-voting option? Could ABucklin fail FBC? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] SODA sometimes FBC-safe MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] SODA sometimes FBC-safe Jameson Quinn
• [EM] "Tablebases" and inverting proportionality models Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Jameson: SODA & FBC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: SODA & FBC Jameson Quinn
• [EM] The oldest bad-example trick in the book MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] The oldest bad-example trick in the book Kevin Venzke
• [EM] An interesting scenario (spoilers, utility) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] An interesting scenario (spoilers, utility) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] An interesting scenario (spoilers, utility) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] C/D is persistent. Another Approval C/D mitigation. IRV and sincerity. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] C/D is persistent. Another Approval C/D mitigation. IRV and sincerity. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] C/D is persistent. Another Approval C/D mitigation. IRV and sincerity. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Update on MMPO class-action lawsuit, trial transcipts MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Turkey-raising. Options. MJ majority protection. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Turkey-raising. Options. MJ majority protection. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? Kathy Dopp
  • Re: [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? Kathy Dopp
  • Re: [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Is Helios online voting secure? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Au revoir, David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Au revoir, Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Au revoir, David L Wetzell
• [EM] Oscar Voting David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Oscar Voting Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Oscar Voting David L Wetzell
• [EM] Post-Autistic Electoral Analysis? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Post-Autistic Electoral Analysis? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Post-Autistic Electoral Analysis? David L Wetzell
• [EM] Does Range need an abstention/participation tally? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Does Range need an abstention/participation tally? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Does Range need an abstention/participation tally? Steve Wolfman
  • Re: [EM] Does Range need an abstention/participation tally? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Does Range need an abstention/participation tally? Kathy Dopp
  • Re: [EM] Does Range need an abstention/participation tally? Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 101 David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 101 Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 101 David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 101 Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 101 David L Wetzell
• [EM] MJ, Bucklin reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] MJ, Bucklin reply Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Campaign contribution reform David L Wetzell
• [EM] Brief MJ comment. ITC & conditional methods. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Brief MJ comment. ITC & conditional methods. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] CFR and Electoral Reform David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Kevin V, Richard F., Raph F David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V, Richard F., Raph F Kevin Venzke
• [EM] 'lection de trois David L Wetzell
• [EM] élection de trois élection de trois David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] Kevin V. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V. Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 89 David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re Rich Fobes, Kristofer M, James G David L Wetzell

• Earlier messages
• Later messages