On 5/9/2019 3:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 3 May 2019, at 19:09, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I think that is right.  But when you consider some simplified cases, e.g. a computation written out on paper (or Bruno's movie graph) it becomes apparent that consciousness must ultimately refer to other things.  Much is made of "self-awareness" but this is usually just having an internal model of one's body, or social standing or some other model of the self.  It is not consciousness of consciousness...that is only a temporal reflection: "I was conscious just now."  In general terms we could say consciousness is awareness of the evironment, where that includes one's body.  Damasio identifies emotions as awareness of the bodies state.  The point is that the stuff of which we are aware and which we find agreement with other people's awareness is what we infer to be the physical world.  It might be possible to be conscious in some sense without a physical world, but it would be qualitatively different.

How could a brain make a person aware that his brain is implemented in a ontological physical reality, or in the arithmetical reality?

Only the observation will differ, and only if mechanism is false.

Why assume matter, when the illusion ion matter can be explained, without it, and *cannot be explained* with it, unless bringing infinities in the ontology?

"Ontology" is just  a philosopher's fancy word for "what I think exists".  Reality is what it is.  There cannot be physical reality vs arithmetical reality.  Did you never read Stanislaw Lem's story in which to prevent a sadistic king from torturing his subjects, Trurl the constructor creates a simulated world in which the king can torture simulated subjects.  But then it  is pointed that the pain of the simulated subjects is real too.

Brent


Bruno





Brent

On 5/3/2019 6:27 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
One way to get around this is to hold that consciousness is associated with the way information is processed. This is substrate independent - the fact that a brain is physical is beside the point. You could implement a brain in software, and insofar as the same kinds of information processing occur, it would be conscious in the same kind of way.

I find this idea compelling because it makes the link between brains and consciousness without requiring matter, and provides a framework for understanding consciousnesses of other kinds of machines.  All that's required is to assume there is something it is like for computation to occur.

Terren

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 2:26 AM <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 8:03:52 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



        On 5/2/2019 4:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:


        On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 5:37:26 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



            On 5/2/2019 11:39 AM, [email protected] wrote:

            Apparently *matter* is not "reducible" to just the
            physics a couple of particles.

            Then you're not a materialist.  You think there is
            matter plus something else, that everyone calls "mind",
            but you're going to call it "matter" and add it to
            everyone else's list of matter so you can still call
            yourself a materialist.

            Brent




        But everything reducing to the physics of particles is
        thought of as *physicalism* (not materialism):


              *Physicalism and materialism*

        Reductive physicalism
        <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductive_physicalism>...is
        normally assumed to be incompatible with panpsychism.
        Materialism <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism>, if
        held to be distinct from physicalism, is compatible with
        panpsychism insofar as mental properties


        What mental properties?  intention? reflection?
        remembering?  That's what I mean by saying attributing
        "experience" to matter is an unprincipled half-measure.

        Brent


    Brains are matter, just as livers, legs, trees, tables, rocks,
    comets, planets, stars, cockroaches, galaxies, bacteria  .. are
    matter.

    Brains produce intentions, reflections, remembrances, ... .

    So (at least some) matter of the cosmos has psychical (mental)
    properties.

    The body+mind idea, the idea that mind is something separate
    from body, is perhaps the worst idea ever invented.

    @philipthrift
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
    it, send an email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5FB4F9DA-97C5-418D-9415-A4A6C472C4E6%40ulb.ac.be <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5FB4F9DA-97C5-418D-9415-A4A6C472C4E6%40ulb.ac.be?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/61f62599-a432-fe3a-44e0-f4cd7fa83556%40verizon.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to