You, David, may be DOING what the early church DID without MEANING what the
early church MEANT. On this one DH may be closer to the truth than DM.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 19, 2006 07:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell BoM
David M
As DH has acknowledged and, 'everyone here already
knows', you know the teachings of his sect as well or better than he does. Are
you attempting to teach or embarrass him?
ONCE AGAIN, I'd recommend the book 'Joseph Smith -
Rough Stone Rolling' Richard Lyman Bushman
- Original Message
David:Or, the Holy Spirit is not a rationalist.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 18, 2006 23:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is the day in Genesis literal or figurative?
JD wrote:
And virtually all of my argumentation was
of a contextual in
David:On warning (wo)men re:'transgressing the commandments of God'.
Everyone (including you along with all of those within your sect, David)
'transgresses the commandments of God', David. You then, David, ought to be
and, likely are, warning those non-protestants within your sect concerning
th
Sectarianism! Amen! Have you (of course you have)
taken note of those who so identify others as sectarians while their group
(sect) is thus reflective of a repristinated gospel. They seem themselves as
'recovering' the truth.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Sectarians indeed, John! You've identified the real
question.Yes, He is (the creator)! I think that the sectarians marginalize
themselves.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006
e?
Wouldn't you call this being
doubleminded? His doctrine is "Reformed" Calvinistic - same
thing
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:56:21 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I LITERALLY cleaned m
onary of science. I strongly disagree.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is the day in Genesis literal or figurative?
Think of the early chapters of Genesis as the
Think of the early chapters of Genesis as theological literature with the
emphasis on 'literature'. It is a well drawn story.
Bruce Waltke, in a recent commentary on Genesis, says "the prologue
announces that the God of the covenant community is the same as the Creator
of the cosmos."
Waltke
Lance finds himself compelled to jump in, David. What indeed is the point of
this hypothetical construct at the conclusion of your post? It is totally
meaningless. Whitcomb would not, I say again not, be taken seriously as a
theologian any more than Tim LaHaye would.
From: "David Miller" <[EM
reements among believers in these matters. For example, if I
were to share my knowledge of Creation, or the Nephilim, or the Noachide
flood, etc., while my knowledge might be greater than many believers in
many
of these areas, I expect a lot of hearty amens as opposed to suspicion and
disa
tha ttime would have been much better
spent in God's Word - He will let you know for sure
what He means when one comes on His terms.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:11:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
That which follows is a phony self-deprecat
il.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006 09:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] torrance
Since he quotes the Scots Confession, I would say his
understanding could be found
therein.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:47:33 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTEC
Judy:What is 'The Reformed Doctrine of Election' as
T. F. Torrance understands it (not as you understand it)?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006 09:29
Subject: [TruthTalk] torrance
In his writing be
from God's Word Lance. God calls
this kind of a person "double-minded" and says
that they will receive nothing from the Lord. (James
1:7,8)
Why do you call the Promise
"nonexistent?"
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:01:32 -0500 "Lance Muir" &
octrine is "Reformed" Calvinistic - same thing
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:56:21 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I LITERALLY cleaned my glasses, Judy. I took
your interpretation to heart and, you are wrong vis a vis TFT's take on
-------
Original message -- From: "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are quite correct as to your TFT
observations, JD. Judy brings to her reading of TFT a bias that will not
permit an equitable treatment of that which is
that shows us that all that we
are and have done even as believers is called
in question.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:07:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
You are quite correct as to your TFT
observations, JD. Judy brings to her reading of TFT a bia
David:Please be even-handed with your reprimands.
Would you not concur that Judy's question below is rhetorical in nature? Is she
not actually saying 'John, you are calling God a liar'? IMO such micromanaging
of the list says more about you than either of them. Remember the good old days
whe
You are quite correct as to your TFT observations,
JD. Judy brings to her reading of TFT a bias that will not permit an equitable
treatment of that which is there in the text of his article.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; Trut
Other than the possible uniform affirmation that
God in Christ (see Colossians) is the 'commencer', I suspect that the views of
most informed believers would vary greatly on Gen 1-11. Why wouldn't
they?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglo
IFO believe this to be both appropriate and wise,
David. Long ago Jonathan offered up a description of the participants on TT. His
observations, IMO, have been borne out over time.The dialogue has become almost
totally adversarial in tone. Most of those who had something to say, and said it
All of Canada chimes in 'bishop'.
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 18, 2006 07:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] creation
continued
Thank you and yes I am. Children are a
in Canada-ese? :-) iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:01 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth Knowable?
Iz:Firstly, I WAS referring to myself and, NOT to David. Will you, ki
Title: The radical consequences of justification, by T.F. Torrance
I apologize David.
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 17, 2006 13:36
Subject: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator Comment
**
Please do not forwa
David:I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume this not to
be a trick question. So then, yes. I am a teleological evolutionist thus
making me 'that sort' of 'creationist'. Lucid?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 17, 2006
bels' chariot and
had the ravens feed
him while he rested and regrouped in a cave.
Tell me - what would be too difficult for a
God like this and how can the feeble efforts of man
explain
Him?
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:57:56 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROT
Conor: Might we hear from you on this? Frame this
in whatever fashion suits you.
Lance
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:38 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth Knowable?
Lance, upon reading David's post below, exhibits 'cranial density' his own
Welcome Conor (Group hug)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 16, 2006 16:05
Subject: [TruthTalk] Hello
Hello Everyone,
I recently joined truth talk and just wanted to introduce myself. My
name
is Conor Mancone. I'll be graduating from the Universi
As George Carlin once said concerning the many variations of the word
'flammable' "a thing either flams or, it doesn't". Now, as to your
expression, 'technically, they are not believers',..they are or they are not
believers, David. Your, and it is 'your', 'instant' theology would need some
expa
ectly being communicated by
the sacred text.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth Knowable?
David:Please distinguish 'believe the same thing about these pas
their father. The other spirit still had a hold on them. He
told
another group that they had Moses and the
prophets so they should hear them. There are no excuses for not
saying what God says so far as I can see.
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:12:13 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] The relationship of sin and believers.
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 16, 2006 09:50
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The relationship of sin and
believers.
How timely. I JUST THIS MOMENT
finished the following pa
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] The relationship of sin and believers.
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 16, 2006 09:57
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The relationship of sin and
believers.
And the paragraphs just before that
read:
In the nex
c, that is a mistake. Furthermore, emotions often cloud logic,
and
cause people to embrace falsehood. What do you think?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth Knowab
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 15, 2006 22:14
Subject: having finished V's postmodernism lecture
I
mentioned the relational bit in my reply to your forwarded Wrightsaid post. For
the rest: having been able to listen to it
Title: A few lines from Gilead
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 15, 2006 21:41
Subject: A few lines from Gilead
I am currently reading it, and it's
wonderful. In case you don't know or have forgotten, it's a letter w
Title: PALM Report Vol 4 Issue 9
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Fligg PALM
Ministries
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 16, 2006 07:52
Subject: PALM Alert!
PALM Alert!
Lifting up Mississauga in
Prayer
John 17:21 May they be brought to complete unity
PALM -Pray ALways
Missis
ng the
same thing in the end time and this is the "unity" Christ
prayed for... The definition of "believer" should
be "one who speaks as the oracles of God"
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:38:59 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
T
ritten
in scripture - because IYO truth changes generationally and according to
culture then it really isn't truth because they could be saying dog and I
might be hearing cat. Is this what you are saying
Lance?
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:47:08 -0500 "Lance Mui
Dave:You appear rather exercised over this matter.
Why is this such a 'hot button' issue for you? IFO don't believe Gary to be
violating any copyright laws.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 15, 2006 23:21
Subject
both A and NON A at the same time.
Is the definition of this philosophy - irrationality -
PostModernism?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Rhetorical questions are intended to provoke
thought rather than bring forth an answer. It may well be the case that
- Original Message -
From: "Debbie Sawczak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lance Muir'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 15, 2006 08:20
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: excerpt redux
My, that was fast!
I guess we have to take his word for it. I
ylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 15, 2006 08:17
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The dearly
departed
You haven't answered my question Lance
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:03:01 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wr
th changes generationally and according to culture
then it really isn't truth because they could be saying dog and I might be
hearing cat. Is this what you are saying Lance?
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:47:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I've no p
is figurative of destruction?
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin:As to the probability of any
conversation, am I to understand your to be meaning something like this:
'The Scriptural teaching on Hell is clear beyond question. What I, along
wit
departed
I am saying that I don't understand your question
Lance - so it looks like you have excused yourself
again.
Why are you so full of conditions - is it really
that difficult to say what you mean?
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:31:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAI
rly
departed
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:02:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Would you be so kind Judy, as to restate 'apprehend and apply' so as to demonstrate
to me that therein lies the meaning 'truth is NOT
fixed and eternal..&
response to this "inflammatory brand" as
slams?
If it was 2 is that itself inflammatory?
Is it the Dogmatism that bothers you?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dean:It was a meaningless congratulatory
message. As I read yesterday's salvo
Kevin:As to the probability of any conversation, am
I to understand your to be meaning something like this: 'The Scriptural teaching
on Hell is clear beyond question. What I, along with most everyone I know
believes concerning this matter is not open to discussion.' Thereafter you would
cite
h is fixed and eternal in every
generation. God does not change and neither does His Word
which is forever sealed in heaven. As Dean
warns - better be sure you are not dancing around a calf.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Each generation must apprehend then apply the truth
in a manner appropriate to its time. This is but one reason IFO favour newer
translations of all sacred texts, including the text of scripture. Some recent
christian teaching/writing is an asset to the believing community. FWIW, I'd
dance t
ginal Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/14/2006 7:28:58 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Dean as a
candidate for Moderator?
What I've got against MLM's? (Multi level
marketing schemes) They choose persons who are not
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 14, 2006 22:04
Subject: excerpt redux
Lance, I was just printing out the next raw chapter (on
"Two Kinds of Righteousness" and "A Meditation on Christ's Passion") in
prepara
Suggested reading:
1. 'Dare we Hope "That all men be Saved"? with a short discourse on Hell -
Hans Urs Von Balthasar
2. 'Four Views on Hell' Counterpoints series
3. 'The One Purpose of God' An answer to the Doctrine of Eternal Punishment'
Jan Bonda
4. 'Hell': A Hard Look at a Hard Question - Th
Perhaps the biggest 'current' offender is Lance.
I'll speak with him on this so as to pull him into line, so to speak. Thereafter
we could make things a little easier on the list owner
re:'moderation'.
Anonymous
'Why he was installed as Moderator' is a mystery to
me also. This is a task that was simply beyond his abilities and, IMO, DM either
knew or, should have known that.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
How do you KNOW this?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 14, 2006 12:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is a Mormon a Christian?
Lance wrote:
David:I understand that you have your
own sect.
No, Lance, I do not have my own sect. I have correcte
Unless I missed some announcement, we're
'moderatorless' at the moment.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 14, 2006 11:42
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The dearly
departed
Why would you prefer
to ask of our
All persons over all time have access to THE ONE WHO IS THE TRUTH. All
persons who have accessed the one who is the truth articulate their
experience, even via scripture, differently.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 14, 2006 11:41
Subje
Most things are more 'complexified' than you and
your ilk see them. Do you have flush toilets where you are?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 14, 2006 07:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] David Miller
2
Real Bapti
Kevin:I'd like to believe that David is not playing
with you (the cat and mouse thingy) but, at times it'd appear so.You rarely
'see/hear' the point(s) of his posts. IMO he knows that you won't. IMO this is
similar to his engagement with Dean. He seems capable of being 'humbly
patronising'.I
What I've got against MLM's? (Multi level marketing
schemes) They choose persons who are not up to the task and thus, are bound
to fail. The list owner should have known this. IFO did know this. DM is both
more gifted and, more intelligent than I. Why then, DM, did you ever make this
choice?
Which Baptists?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 14, 2006 06:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] David Miller
2
WOW what a revelation!
Just about as shocking as when I learned that Baptists were "anti -
charis
g that they will
know God in their own time. They are just on a journey of finding how life
is empty without Him. It is during this time that we must stay faithful to
them. Just some thoughts...
Joanna
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "Joanna"
<[EM
nd in who knows what kind
of amazing committments down the road somewhere...Do we believe this??
Jesus changes lives..in His time and His way. What an awesome relief to
know that I just have to walk alongside those He puts my way and He'll do the
rest! Thank you for listening!
Joan
IFO believe Kevin's sect simply leaps, spiritually speaking of course, from
'a' to 'z'. This is why he's had so much difficulty, from time to time, with
you and your sect, David.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 13, 2006 17:52
Subject: Re
David: IMO this is all Blah! Blah! Blah! Boring, boring boring! You've said
all of this before and, in the same words. You from your sectarian ideaology
could engage could engage Kevin's, Dean's, Judy's and Linda's respective
sects and speak representing both sides. This is mockuology!
Or
David:I understand that you have your own sect. Do any of its adherents
worship idols? FWIW, I'd guess that at least a few of your sectarians do,
given the law of average and all.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 13, 2006 14:28
Subject:
r
T?
Job 1:22 In all this Job sinned not
Then we have a
declaration, GREAT VICTORY! the Fornicator is STILL a
FORNICATOR!
Your kinder gentler
Humanistic Religion really works! What a
testimony!
I perceive most of you as writing from an 'I've
arrived, I'm mature, I'm without conscious wrongdoing in my life,
perspective.(Iz an exception?) Would your spouses concur? Would your closest
friends concur?
In all my years of connection with the believing
community, I've never met person
Is it the Mormon in
you doing such-or are you just plain
mean?.
-
Original Message -
F
rom: Lance Muir
To:
Doesn't it make you just beam with pride, the
appropriate kind of course, being exposed to the handiwork of two such fine
representatives of 'their' gospel as DEAN AND KEVIN! IFO speak often of them. I
share their posts with friends who then say things like
From:
Dave
Linda: Joanna is a woman who, upon completing her
pre-med studies. went on a short term mission trip to, of all places, the Bronx.
She is Pakistani. The passion God gave her for those disenfrancised she
encountered there has never left her.
When she finished typing on my computer she went
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 11, 2006 22:35
Subject: Dylan
Watching the Dylan
documentary reminded me how much I like that music. Not just Dylan but Pete
Seeger (what a wonderful voice!), Woody Guthrie, Joan Baez. On the wa
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 11, 2006 22:20
Subject: Blue Man Group
Like I
said, it was amazing. (I told you I was prepared to dislike it, but behind the
advance guard I put up sometimes, my mind is usually open. Sancho P
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 11, 2006 21:06
Subject: Stone Reader
I liked it. I was going to say I loved it, but then I
realized that what I loved wasn’t it but the
ideas and impressions it evoked in me—especially the mem
xpert come and speak for
himself so we can see if his words stand the Bible test-So far the dancing
brotherhood have fallen way short-To dizzy from all the dancing around
passages in the Bible to get a solid footing on truth.
- Original Message -
From:
Well, since I'm being asked for a response on
this...my initial feeling is that we need to live in the real world having
contact with real people...perhaps listen a little more to others and how they
live. In my experience with people, including believers by the way,
struggle with sin is co
Director Harbor Light Mission Toronto - 10
years
Director Harbor Light Mission Detroit - 5
years
We discussed the responses I received on TT. He was
outraged at the burden you'd lay on believers as a result of a theology absent
grace. In addition to that which was previously spoken of, he
ll
I cornered poor BT with the futility of his logic, and the next
thing you knew he (again) disappeared from TT. Read the whole archives and
see for yourself. J
iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy says 'I hate all sin and that includes me
(mine)'. Just how are we to understand this, Judy?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 11, 2006 06:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Believers in
bondage to sin?
Your criticism of DM on astrology is based upon a
faulty 'reading'. This faulty reading was exhibited by Kevin re:David's nuanced
take on pagan, cult/sect & Mormonism.Genuine conversations take place when
the view of the other person is equitably represented. Now, if ppl can't read TT
with u
I've a friend who runs a group home. He works the
streets in the toughest area of one of Canada's largest cities. He is presently
heading up a small group of believers, newer and older, including some
seminarians, who are addicted to pornography and homosexuality
Comments?
Thanks for thinking of me, David. I did watch the
entire clip.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk
Sent: March 10, 2006 14:21
Subject: [TruthTalk] Greasy Grace - New
Product
Lance, being that you are an avid movie watcher, you might be inte
Great reviews on this book by a practicing Mormon.
Bushman, historian & professor emeritus at Columbia
University.
FYI: Izzy, Judy, Kevin & Dean.
THANKS TO THE BISHOP FOR THIS FINE
WORK!
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lance Muir
Sent: March 10, 2006 11:52
Subject: Re: JOHN: An extended discussion on
Person/Persons/Personhood including you, BT and, DM
Well, just a
Sent: March 10, 2006 09:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Boring/Not
Boring?
Whoopdeedo!! The Judge of TT has
made his pronouncement
Lord forbid anyone should evaluate his
accusations, judgments, and prolific references ...
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:01:04 -0500 "Lance Muir&quo
Gary, John, DM, CM, DH, Iz.NOT
boringIMO of course (several of the departees were also not
boring...Jonathan, Caroline, Debbie, Slade and, Bill Taylor
And, as Linda Richman of 'Coffee Talk' used to say:
the rest of you 'talk amongst yourselves'!! (IHO)
A tribute to David M
his one or
like Nancy Reagan, you just say No!
jt
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:32:10 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I've already acknowledged that I'm often not up
to the level at which Judy, Kevin and Dean 'dialogue'.
FWIW-Moderator Comment ran
as an ongoing subject line for an extended period.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 10, 2006 06:23
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Responding to
Moderator Comments
I'm not David Miller but am operating under the
assumption that a public post is open to a public response.
Barry Goldwater lost an election due to the
perception that he'd have HIS 'finger on the button'. You seem to trumpet such
'power' (?) saying such things as 'let's get it on'. Violenc
Always good to see a 'person' such as yourself on
TT, Bishop!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 09, 2006 13:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hidden in
Christ
Just talked to my 38 year old lawyer/state wres
urney
DO WE REALLY WANT TO GO
THEREONtoLOGICALy?Ontorelation aspects of personhood and
the chemical attachments?My holistic rememberance of the "discussions"
brings back bad memories!Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It&
- Original Message -
From: "John D Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 09, 2006 10:54
Subject: Prayer Update: Shankar
Greetings from Singapore. Today I met with Shankar--the Taoist I met in
Singapore a year ago. His mother came from Japan and his father fr
ew creation" - old things pass away and all things
become new.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:02:08 -0500 "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
1. I've no idea as we've
e -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March
09, 2006 08:49
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes
anyone'?
SO
ot;personhood"
The invitation is to become part
of a "new creation" - old things pass away and all things become
new.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:02:08 -0500 "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
m: Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March
09, 2006 08:49
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
SO
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
201 - 300 of 5161 matches
Mail list logo
