[FairfieldLife] Sanskrit words of the day: embrace, part 1 : a-

2006-07-30 Thread cardemaister

All the entries for "embrace" that begin with 'a', 
in Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon: 

1 abhiparigrah to clasp , embrace Ma1nGr2.  
2 abhipariSvaJj ( %{svaJj}) , (p. %{-Svajat}) to embrace R.  
3 abhirabh A1. (perf. 3. pl. %{-rebhire}) to embrace BhP.: Caus. 
perf. Pass. p. %{-rambhita} see below.  
4 abhisaMsvaJj A1. (Imper. 2 sg. %{-svajasva}) to embrace AV. xii , 
3 , 12.  
5 abhiSvaJj ( %{svaJj}) , %{-Svajate} (impf. %{-aSvajata} Pa1n2. 8-
3 , 63 ; perf. %{-Sasvaje} , or %{-SasvaJje} ib. , 118 Ka1s3.) to 
embrace MBh. viii , 1652: (exceptionally) P. (Opt. %{-Svajet}) id. 
MBh. xii , 8796. [72,1]  
6 aGgapAli f. an embrace L. ; see %{aGka-pAli}. 
7 aGkapAli f. or embracing , an embrace L. 
8 aGkapAlI f. an embrace ; a nurse L. ; the plant (Piring) Medicago 
Esculenta. 
9 aGkapAlikA f. embracing , an embrace L. 
10 aGkolikA f. (a corruption of %{aGka-pAlikA} q.v.) , an embrace L.  
11 akS (perhaps a kind of old Desid. of 1. %{az}) cl. 1. 5. %
{akSati} , %{akSNoti} (Pa1n2. 3-1 , 75 ; fut. %{akSiSyati} or %
{akSyati} L. ; aor. %{AkSIt} , 3. du. %{AkSiSTAm} or %{ASTAm} L. ; 
perf. %{AnakSa} [Pa1n2. 7-4 , 60 Comm.] , but A1. p. [with the Vedic 
weak stem %{AkS} cf. perf. %{Az-uH} 3. pl. &c. fr. 1. %{az}] %
{AkSANa4}) , ; to reach RV. x , 22 , 11 ; to pass through , 
penetrate , pervade , embrace L. ; to accumulate (to from the cube?) 
L.: Caus. %{akSayati} , %{AcikSat} , to cause to pervade L.: Desid. %
{acikSi} , %{Sati} or %{acikSati} L.  
12 AliGg P. %{-liGgati} and %{-liGgayati} A1. %{-liGgate} , to 
clasp , join the limbs closely ; to encircle , embrace MBh. Katha1s. 
Pan5cat. Ragh. &c. ; to spread out , extend VarBr2S.  
13 AliGgana n. clasping , embracing ; an embrace MBh. Pan5cat. Megh. 
&c. ; (%{A}) f. id. Naish.  
14 AliGgita mfn. embraced Ra1jat. Sa1h. &c. ; occupied [154,1] ; (%
{am}) n. an embrace Megh. 
15 anubhU to enclose , embrace ChUp. ; to be after , attain , equal 
RV. &c. ; to be useful , to help S3Br. S3a1n3khS3r. ; to turn or 
incline to RV. x , 147 , 1 [36,3] ; to notice , perceive , 
understand ; to experience , to attempt.  
16 avaguh %{-gUhati} [AV. xx , 133 , 4 S3Br.] , %{-te} [Ka1tyS3r. 
&c.] , to cover , hide , conceal , put into or inside ; to embrace 
VarBr2S. Pan5cat.  
17 AzleSa m. intimate connection , contact ; slight contact L. ; 
embracing , embrace ; intwining MBh. BhP. Megh. Amar. &c. ; 
adherence , clinging to Nya1yam. ; (%{A4}) f. and (%{A4s}) f. pl.N. 
of the seventh Nakshatra AV. TS. Sus3r. MBh. VarBr2S.  
18 AzliS (cf. %{A-zre4Sa} above) P. %{-zliSyati} (but also %{-
zliSati} BhP. R.) and A1. %{-zliSyate} (MBh. i , 3040) to adhere or 
cling to TS. MBh. [159,1] ; to embrace Mn. MBh. BhP. S3ak. R. 
Pan5cat. Katha1s. &c.: Caus. %{-zleSayati} , to affix , stick on 
La1t2y. Ka1tyS3r. ; to embrace (see %{A-zleSita}).  








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> >
> > I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher 
> > David Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the 
> > middle of program, two security guards ushered him out.
> 
> So much for the World Peace.

I wouldn't be surprised if "the numbers" don't
get any higher at this point. A lot of people
were probably waiting, saying to themselves,
"They *say* that it's Ok for us to come, and 
that there won't be any of the heavyhanded 
fascist stuff this time. But when we actually 
get there, what will it be like?"  

Well, now they know. 'Thoughtcrime' is still
a crime, and Big Brother still rules.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David
> Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of 
program,
> two security guards ushered him out.
>

Does he practise the TM Program regularly?

If "yes", you should share the "Hundreds of meditations" MP3 audio in 
the files section with him and have him play it for the muckety-mucks.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David
> Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of 
program,
> two security guards ushered him out.
>
So much for the World Peace.
Ingegerd







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/31/06 12:06:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, we 
  are in a dangerous period, and I am just wondering what is any way to 
  avoid what appears to be a collision course...

You don't think Iran knows  what the US could do to them if they use 
nukes first? What Iran will try to do is black mail the west into not 
interfering with their plans for Israel. Ahmadinegad   thinks he is 
destined to create enough chaos in the world to bring the Madhi who will make 
the world submit to Islam or die.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "larry.potter" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> > > larry.potter wrote:
> > ? > 
> > > > There will always be people that will be willing to close 
their
> > > > eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's 
too 
> > > > late.
> > > > The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what 
> is 
> > > > happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
> regard 
> > > > to Nazi Germany.
> > > > The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and 
media 
> is 
> > > > working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
> > > > denial at this point of time. 
> > > 
> > > Only people who fear death are scared. That's what 
> > > enlightenment gives us: freedom from fear.  There 
> > > are smarter ways of dealing with the problem.
> > 
> > Thank you for saying this. It's about time
> > someone did.
> > 
> > These two guys -- Larry and Robert -- are
> > AFRAID, that's all.
> 
> only a fool will not be afraid of Iran have nuke power.
> 
>  They're so afraid that
> > they're willing to justify a preemptive
> > nuclear strike
> 
> I never said that I'm willing to justify preemptive
> nuclear strike. Don't put words i didn't say in my mouth.
> is it the hour or just your memory ? :0
> 
> 
> > on an entire nation of people 
> > just *because* they're afraid. And that makes
> > them EXACTLY like the people they're afraid
> > of.
> >

If Hitler's Nazi's had developed an Atom bomb, do you think they 
would have used it to win the war?
If Iran attain a nuclear bomb, and the means to deliver it,
Do you think they would use it, to win this war they've declared on 
us?
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >  
> > In a message dated 7/30/06 6:03:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> > sparaig@ writes:
> > 
> > One  small example, but a way in which the US can still move in 
the 
> > >  direction of peace while realistically protecting our 
interests. 
> > >  
> > > These ideas of "I can kick your ass before you kick mine" 
and "I can  
> > > kick your ass so hard, you'll never get back at me" are the 
most  
> > > short-sighted and foolish and damaging policies. Anyone 
pursuing  
> > > such ideas in the government should be removed from office 
> > >  immediately! Such stupid and dull thinking.
> > >
> > 
> > Actually, a strong  country should have that as a given, but be 
so 
> > self-confidant that it  
> > never needs to be spoken of. That the Bush Administration appears 
to make  it 
> > the heart of 
> > their diplomatic strategy is a Very Bad  Thing.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The Bush administration asked the European community to handle 
the  situation 
> > and negotiations with Iran. They became frustrated with the lack 
of  progress 
> > and insisted the US become more involved. Bush has said all along 
that  there 
> > will be a negotiated settlement. The only thing Bush has said in 
regards  to 
> > force is that military options are not off the table but are a 
last  resort. 
> > And I would bet that was the reason the Europeans asked for US  
involvement in 
> > the talks.
> >
> 
> I was about to agree with you until I recalled that "all military 
options" for Bush, includes 
> first-strike nuclear ones.

It is true that the Bush administration are like hill-billy's when it 
comes to diplomacy; as we know our image in the world is not so hot 
these days.
But when it comes to 'first strike capability';
That is America's main line of defense, and all the billions we've 
spent on weapons and satellites...
At least we need to explain through 'truth in propaganda'
That the weapons they seek and lust for;
We already have, and in a much greater form.
We need to remind them, that we are in a better position,
To,'Wipe them off the map", as they have threatened Israel, 
And I'm sure they would like the same thing for us, here.
So, we need to be a little more aggresive with these people.
We are in a weak position now, in world opinion, because of Iraq.
Which is why Iran is taking advantage of this weakened situation.
Israel has weakened itself also, by this latest action, in the eyes 
of world opionion.
So, we are in a dangerous period, and I am just wondering what is any 
way to avoid what appears to be a collision course...
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread scienceofabundance
Rick: Do you  think that  this is because someone at MUM Admin saw 
your message earlier, or someone non-MUM saw it and reported it to MUM?
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> >
> > I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher 
David
> > Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of
> program,
> > two security guards ushered him out.
> >







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >  
> > In a message dated 7/30/06 5:07:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> > jflanegi@ writes:
> > 
> > With the  economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there 
are a 
> > huge amount of  alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even 
> > conventional  weapons.
> > 
> > I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas  
> > Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya 
> > abandoned  its nuclear weapons program not because of the US 
invasion 
> > of Iraq, but  because behind the scenes we provided them with a 
> > security assurance that  if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear 
> > weapons] direction, we promised not  to attack them.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Iran has been offered and continues to be offered all kinds of 
deals like  
> > that, but they refuse them. They insist having nukes is their  
right.
> >
> 
> The Iranian government, even by Iranian standards, is a bit 
extreme. But not TOO extreme.

I think that different leaders in the Middle East, have had these 
meglomanic quality; 
Where they want to rule the whole show;
Like Ghadafi, and Saddam, and Osama, and Khomeni, or whoever else, 
gets there face on a flag or sign, which is carried down the street 
and revered, in that strange facist way...
And now, the President of Iran, sees himself postitioned;
Because of our folly in Iraq, and because the Shite sect has taken 
over power, in Iraq;
And thier propaganda campaign in Lebanon, with their arm of terror, 
Hezbollah...
So, their 'right' to have nukes, will continue to be dangerous;
Particularly, because they have the raw material, uranium ore, which 
they mine in their own country.
So, this will be continuing dangerous situation...
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread scienceofabundance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
 BTW, the people in charge of 
> the TM organization are quite nice compared to many, if not most, 
people in similar lines 
> of work in other organizations.

I am not sure how you define "nice" (or how much you know about the 
TMO), but my yellow bliss globules started to turn green when I read 
your quote..







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread heshiepothead
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David
> Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of
program,
> two security guards ushered him out.
>

It is truly hard to fathom that this is an organization that claims to
have the technology to promote world peace. It sounds like an episode
of  Law and Order.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> > larry.potter wrote:
> ? > 
> > > There will always be people that will be willing to close their
> > > eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too 
> > > late.
> > > The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
> > > happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
regard 
> > > to Nazi Germany.
> > > The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media 
is 
> > > working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
> > > denial at this point of time. 
> > 
> > Only people who fear death are scared. That's what 
> > enlightenment gives us: freedom from fear.  There 
> > are smarter ways of dealing with the problem.
> 
> Thank you for saying this. It's about time
> someone did.
> 
> These two guys -- Larry and Robert -- are
> AFRAID, that's all. They're so afraid that
> they're willing to justify a preemptive
> nuclear strike on an entire nation of people 
> just *because* they're afraid. And that makes
> them EXACTLY like the people they're afraid
> of.

I will admit for myself anyway;
That there is a cultural fear, or even genetic fear;
In my system, when it comes to Jewish people being attacked.
When this thing is going on in Israel, I can feel it inside;
And it feels quite upsetting.

As far as a pre-emptive nuclear bombing of Iran, or any other nation.
I was asking a basic question;
Is any of our nuclear weapons, which we have developed and advanced;
Since WWII, for billions of dollars;
Is there any justified use of them, ever, for anything?
The 'Cold-War' is over.
Now we have an enemy whose goal it is(as stated today by Chavez, 
whose visiting Iran), is to put an end to the 'American Empire'.
What will the Iranians do with nuclear bombs and missles?
Would they use them on Israel; The President of Iran, said that they 
would.
Do we believe him?
Hitler didn't really try to hide his intentions from the beginning.
But people thought, how could this stupid little man,
Be any real big deal.
We found out how demonic a stupid little man could be.
And many millions of people, on all sides were killed, tortured, and 
lifes changes forever.
So, can the United States at least remind the Iranians:
That we already have all the technology they seek
And that we have the capability to turn their beloved country to dust.
So, at least we bring them back to reality.
If it is possible to bring fanatics back to reality, without a 
strike, to it's nasty throat.
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] A Message about Damascus and Israel

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569





 Isaiah 17:1&3  this message came to me concerning Damascus: 
Look, Damascus will disappear! It will become a heap of ruins. The fortified 
cities of Israel will also be destroyed and the power of Damascus will end. 
Isaiah 17:14 In the evening Israel waits in terror, but by dawn its enemies are 
dead. This is the just reward of those who plunder and destroy the people of 
God.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread sgrayatlarge
-
You haven't read about Tantrik Mantrik wars? 

Gurudev Dr. Narayan Dutt Shrimaliji 's  battle for leadership during 
the 1975 Tantrik Convention in Assam (Kamakya) India. 



Now if you can only get the attention of the leader of Iran and 
N.Korea, then you will be getting somewhere.

-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sgrayatlarge wrote:
> 
> >-
> >and balanced." Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is
> >  
> >
> >>>extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity.
> >>>Maybe what we can derive
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>>from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the 
garbage
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Dear Bhairitu,
> >
> >Please tone down your holier than thou Tantrikness, it's very 
> >embarassing and you know very well true Tantriks would never make 
> >such an immature statement about throwing religion into the 
garbage. 
> >I'm thinking of people like Sri Ramakrishna or The Sage of 
Kanchi, 
> >real spiritual giants. Please realize not everybody is on the 
same 
> >level as you, and one must show understanding and compassion.
> >
> >  
> >
> SGray, I disagree, I think that it is well time that this world 
move on 
> from what physicist Michio Kaku calls a Type 0 civilization.   And 
part 
> of that would be moving away from religion which is a belief 
system into 
> spirituality.  Tantra is about spirituality and is a science not a 
> religion.  The compassion I want to spread is to pick up the world 
by 
> its bootstraps (or ears maybe) and raise it to the next level 
rather 
> than leave it in its dumbed down hole (where religion has lead it -
- 
> among other things).   What everyone who is reading this list has 
done 
> is move away from a belief system into experiential spirituality.
> 
> >-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>larry.potter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  
wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too 
> is "fair 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> >>>There will always be people that will be willing to close their
> >>>eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >late.
> >  
> >
> >>>The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
> >>>happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >regard 
> >  
> >
> >>>to Nazi Germany.
> >>>The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media 
is 
> >>>working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >denial 
> >  
> >
> >>>at this point of time. 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>Only people who fear death are scared.  That's what 
enlightenment 
> >>
> >>
> >gives 
> >  
> >
> >>us: freedom from fear.  There are smarter ways of dealing with 
the 
> >>
> >>
> >problem.
> >  
> >
> and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but 
so 
> 
> 
> >is 
> >  
> >
> extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity. 
> Maybe what we can derive 
> 
> 
> from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >garbage 
> >  
> >
>    
> 
> 
> 
> >>>where 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> it belongs.
>    
> 
> 
> 
> >>>no, religion is just an excuse, it's not the real issue, the 
fact 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >is 
> >  
> >
> >>>that there are Muslims who are truly peaceful.
> >>>However twisting it by radical Muslims and brain wash their 
kids 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >is 
> >  
> >
> >>>the real issue, hijacking the kid's mind, hijacking the true 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >essence 
> >  
> >
> >>>of their religion.
> >>>
> >>>Peace will prevail eventually, the question is how much 
suffering 
> >>>humanity will go thru before it happens.
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>How about overpopulation?  When things start to burst at the 
seams 
> >>
> >>
> >then 
> >  
> >
> >>you have these battles over resources.  I wonder how many burned 
> >>
> >>
> >up 
> >  
> >
> >>planets there  are throughout the universe where beings perished 
> >>
> >>
> >because 
> >  
> >
> >>they failed to evolve to a state where they could reconcile 
their 
> >>differences?  There are probably billions.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> larry.potter wrote:
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?
> >  
> >
> >docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
> >  
> >
> >A wake up call.
> >
> >We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what 
> > 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>extreme 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope 
> >  
> >
> >that 
> >  
> >
> > 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>it 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >will 

[FairfieldLife] Undestanding and Interpreting the Maharishi Effect Impact on Financial Markets

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
http://2006-course-effects.blogspot.com/

A Seed Theoretical Structure for Undestanding and Interpreting the
Maharishi Effect Impact on Financial Markets

Recent coherence project announcements stress the immediate impact of
the project on financial markets. Presumably the theory is that
coherence improves collective optimism, and optimism moves markets
upwards. Thats true in the short-run, but optimism is not a change in
the fundamental core of the economy, in the nuts and bolts, bits and
photons if you will, of the economy. Its a perception,  a change in
interpretation about the fundamental core of the economy. Perception,
and the core itself, are two quite distinct things.

As pointed out in a prior post, the substantive effects* of the three
prior large ME projects took some time to mature and manifest. The
immediate short-run effects indeed were negative.

Three patterns or phases (P1,P2,P3 ) emerge upon examining short-run
ME effects on financial markets:

* market trends flatten or reverse DURING the project
* 2-14 months after the project market trends are flat or remain
within a trading range.
* after this flat period, trends become positive.

These pattern phases might be seen as analogous to:

* major medical procedure -- the patient experiences a type of
shock from the major intervention, sytems flatten or reverse.
* a recouperation phase where the patient rests and heals from a
major medical procedure
* a healthy rebound, beyond past levels of vigor, after the
patient is fully healed.

This lagged longer term effect is consistent with the mechanisms that
drive the market: earnings (and their expectations).  And earnings
expectations -- and the fundamental core of the economy -- are driven
by "productivity" gains aka efficiency.  Technological  innovations
and the  amount of capital investment being prime drivers of
productivityy-- along with related reductions in social, cultural,
educational and political barriers, and constraints in the economy.
Essentially when more is produced with less via long long structural
changes in the economy and society -- the financial markets respond
positively.

For example, "Companies can increase productivity in a variety of
ways. The most obvious methods involve automation and computerization
which minimize the tasks that must be performed by employees.
Recently, less obvious techniques are being employed that involve
ergonomic design and worker comfort. A comfortable employee, the
theory maintains, can produce more than a counterpart who struggles
through the day

Increases in productivity also can influence society more broadly, by
improving living standards, and creating income. They are central to
the process generating economic growth and capital accumulation.
Many economists see the economic expansion of the later 1990s in the
United States as being allowed by the massive increase in worker
productivity that occurred during that period. The growth in aggregate
supply allowed increases in aggregate demand and decreases in
unemployment at the same time that inflation remained stable. Others
emphasize drastic changes in patterns of social behaviour resulting
from new communication technologies and changed male-female
relationships."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity_%28economics%29

"Much of the difference in countries' living standards reflects
differences in their productivity...
... they conceded that during the previous five years [1995-2000] the
United States enjoyed the fastest productivity growth in any such
period since the second world war. Over the whole period from 1995,
labour productivity growth averaged almost 3% a year, twice the
average rate over the previous two decades."
http://www.economist.com/research/Economics/alphabetic.cfm?TERM=POPULATION

This fastest pace of productivity gains was during the same period of
the most rapid rise in the stiock market in history, the internet
boom/bubble. (And correlates with the phase III pattern of the DC
Coherence project. )

The structural changes in the economy -- and related social (work
ethics), cultural (gender equality in the workplace), political
(regulation, tax policy) changes that yield higher productivity - and
ultimately are what drive financial markets higher -- do no happen
over night. A two week coherence project is not going to produce
immediate long-range economic, social, cultural, political, or
technolgocal changes.

However, consistent with the inital patterns found in the correlation
between past coherence projects and financial markets, it is plausible
that there is a incubatory or healing lag between a cohernece project
and a long-run sharp rise in financial markets.

For example, many factors contributed to the sharp increase in
productivity, and the corresponding market explosive rise 1995-2000.
Many many independnet factors had to develop to a critical point, and
then come together and interact in new ways: fiber optic capacity,
miles of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome





on 7/30/06 11:08 PM, bob_brigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com  , Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David
> Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of 
program,
> two security guards ushered him out.
>



Well, at least he only had a short drive back to Iowa City:

http://www.goiowacity.com/heartandsoul/bousfield.html

Different guy.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David
> Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of 
program,
> two security guards ushered him out.
>




Well, at least he only had a short drive back to Iowa City:


http://www.goiowacity.com/heartandsoul/bousfield.html






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome





I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of program, two security guards ushered him out.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "larry.potter" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> > > larry.potter wrote:
> > ? > 
> > > > There will always be people that will be willing to close 
their
> > > > eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's 
too 
> > > > late.
> > > > The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what 
> is 
> > > > happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
> regard 
> > > > to Nazi Germany.
> > > > The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and 
media 
> is 
> > > > working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
> > > > denial at this point of time. 
> > > 
> > > Only people who fear death are scared. That's what 
> > > enlightenment gives us: freedom from fear.  There 
> > > are smarter ways of dealing with the problem.
> > 
> > Thank you for saying this. It's about time
> > someone did.
> > 
> > These two guys -- Larry and Robert -- are
> > AFRAID, that's all.
> 
> only a fool will not be afraid of Iran have nuke power.
> 
>  They're so afraid that
> > they're willing to justify a preemptive
> > nuclear strike
> 
> I never said that I'm willing to justify preemptive
> nuclear strike. Don't put words i didn't say in my mouth.
> is it the hour or just your memory ? :0

No, it's Barry's M.O.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread Bhairitu
sgrayatlarge wrote:

>-
>and balanced." Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is
>  
>
>>>extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity.
>>>Maybe what we can derive
>>>  
>>>
>>>from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the garbage
>>
>>
>
>
>Dear Bhairitu,
>
>Please tone down your holier than thou Tantrikness, it's very 
>embarassing and you know very well true Tantriks would never make 
>such an immature statement about throwing religion into the garbage. 
>I'm thinking of people like Sri Ramakrishna or The Sage of Kanchi, 
>real spiritual giants. Please realize not everybody is on the same 
>level as you, and one must show understanding and compassion.
>
>  
>
SGray, I disagree, I think that it is well time that this world move on 
from what physicist Michio Kaku calls a Type 0 civilization.   And part 
of that would be moving away from religion which is a belief system into 
spirituality.  Tantra is about spirituality and is a science not a 
religion.  The compassion I want to spread is to pick up the world by 
its bootstraps (or ears maybe) and raise it to the next level rather 
than leave it in its dumbed down hole (where religion has lead it -- 
among other things).   What everyone who is reading this list has done 
is move away from a belief system into experiential spirituality.

>-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>larry.potter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too 
is "fair 
   



>>>There will always be people that will be willing to close their
>>>eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too 
>>>  
>>>
>late.
>  
>
>>>The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
>>>happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
>>>  
>>>
>regard 
>  
>
>>>to Nazi Germany.
>>>The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media is 
>>>working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
>>>  
>>>
>denial 
>  
>
>>>at this point of time. 
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>Only people who fear death are scared.  That's what enlightenment 
>>
>>
>gives 
>  
>
>>us: freedom from fear.  There are smarter ways of dealing with the 
>>
>>
>problem.
>  
>
and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so 


>is 
>  
>
extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity. 
Maybe what we can derive 


from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the 
>>>  
>>>
>garbage 
>  
>
   



>>>where 
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
it belongs.
   



>>>no, religion is just an excuse, it's not the real issue, the fact 
>>>  
>>>
>is 
>  
>
>>>that there are Muslims who are truly peaceful.
>>>However twisting it by radical Muslims and brain wash their kids 
>>>  
>>>
>is 
>  
>
>>>the real issue, hijacking the kid's mind, hijacking the true 
>>>  
>>>
>essence 
>  
>
>>>of their religion.
>>>
>>>Peace will prevail eventually, the question is how much suffering 
>>>humanity will go thru before it happens.
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>How about overpopulation?  When things start to burst at the seams 
>>
>>
>then 
>  
>
>>you have these battles over resources.  I wonder how many burned 
>>
>>
>up 
>  
>
>>planets there  are throughout the universe where beings perished 
>>
>>
>because 
>  
>
>>they failed to evolve to a state where they could reconcile their 
>>differences?  There are probably billions.
>>
>>
>>
larry.potter wrote:

   



>http://video.google.com/videoplay?
>  
>
>docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
>  
>
>A wake up call.
>
>We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what 
> 
>
>  
>
>>>extreme 
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope 
>  
>
>that 
>  
>
> 
>
>  
>
>>>it 
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>will disappear by itself and stay delusional.
>
>I'm interested to hear your feedback on it. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>  
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >  
> > In a message dated 7/30/06 5:07:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> > jflanegi@ writes:
> > 
> > With the  economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there 
are a 
> > huge amount of  alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even 
> > conventional  weapons.
> > 
> > I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas  
> > Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya 
> > abandoned  its nuclear weapons program not because of the US 
invasion 
> > of Iraq, but  because behind the scenes we provided them with a 
> > security assurance that  if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear 
> > weapons] direction, we promised not  to attack them.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Iran has been offered and continues to be offered all kinds of 
deals like  
> > that, but they refuse them. They insist having nukes is their  
right.
> >
> 
> The Iranian government, even by Iranian standards, is a bit 
extreme. But not TOO extreme.
>
I am reasonably sure that if another country wanted to cherry pick  
quotes from members of our US government, we'd appear quite extreme 
also...





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Invincibility Course for Lebanon

2006-07-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 9:37:45 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> The fact  is most of Beirut has been left untouched by Israel, 
although by 
> >  media reports, it looks like the entire city is in shambles. 
Maps were 
> shown  on 
> > a news report this morning pin pointing specific  damage.
> >
> 
> Interesting. So, by that measure, the 9/11 attack  wasn't very 
severe becuse 
> 99.999$ of 
> New York City buildings were still  standing?
> 
> 
> 
> 911 was unprovoked Spair. New York, nor the rest of the United 
States was  
> housing any terrorist organizations that were attacking anybody 
else unless you  
> want to conclude like Bevin that Osama was only trying to "purify" 
his  
> country.
>

Playing the blame game only results in more deaths. The story I 
heard was that Israel earlier had crossed into Lebanon and kidnapped 
three Hezbollah leaders from their homes. Hezbollah then kidnapped 
two soldiers, hoping to trade them for the three Hezbollah leaders.

This stuff never happens in a vacuum.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread larry.potter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> > larry.potter wrote:
> ? > 
> > > There will always be people that will be willing to close their
> > > eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too 
> > > late.
> > > The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what 
is 
> > > happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
regard 
> > > to Nazi Germany.
> > > The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media 
is 
> > > working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
> > > denial at this point of time. 
> > 
> > Only people who fear death are scared. That's what 
> > enlightenment gives us: freedom from fear.  There 
> > are smarter ways of dealing with the problem.
> 
> Thank you for saying this. It's about time
> someone did.
> 
> These two guys -- Larry and Robert -- are
> AFRAID, that's all.

only a fool will not be afraid of Iran have nuke power.

 They're so afraid that
> they're willing to justify a preemptive
> nuclear strike

I never said that I'm willing to justify preemptive
nuclear strike. Don't put words i didn't say in my mouth.
is it the hour or just your memory ? :0


> on an entire nation of people 
> just *because* they're afraid. And that makes
> them EXACTLY like the people they're afraid
> of.
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread sgrayatlarge
-
and balanced." Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is
>>extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity.
>>Maybe what we can derive
>>from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the garbage


Dear Bhairitu,

Please tone down your holier than thou Tantrikness, it's very 
embarassing and you know very well true Tantriks would never make 
such an immature statement about throwing religion into the garbage. 
I'm thinking of people like Sri Ramakrishna or The Sage of Kanchi, 
real spiritual giants. Please realize not everybody is on the same 
level as you, and one must show understanding and compassion.


-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> larry.potter wrote:
> 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too 
> >>is "fair 
> >>
> >>
> >
> >There will always be people that will be willing to close their
> >eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too 
late.
> >The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
> >happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with 
regard 
> >to Nazi Germany.
> >The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media is 
> >working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
denial 
> >at this point of time. 
> >  
> >
> Only people who fear death are scared.  That's what enlightenment 
gives 
> us: freedom from fear.  There are smarter ways of dealing with the 
problem.
> 
> >>and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so 
is 
> >>extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity. 
> >>Maybe what we can derive 
> >>from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the 
garbage 
> >>
> >>
> >where 
> >  
> >
> >>it belongs.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >no, religion is just an excuse, it's not the real issue, the fact 
is 
> >that there are Muslims who are truly peaceful.
> >However twisting it by radical Muslims and brain wash their kids 
is 
> >the real issue, hijacking the kid's mind, hijacking the true 
essence 
> >of their religion.
> >
> >Peace will prevail eventually, the question is how much suffering 
> >humanity will go thru before it happens.
> > 
> >  
> >
> How about overpopulation?  When things start to burst at the seams 
then 
> you have these battles over resources.  I wonder how many burned 
up 
> planets there  are throughout the universe where beings perished 
because 
> they failed to evolve to a state where they could reconcile their 
> differences?  There are probably billions.
> 
> >>larry.potter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>A wake up call.
> >>>
> >>>We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >extreme 
> >  
> >
> >>>Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope 
that 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >it 
> >  
> >
> >>>will disappear by itself and stay delusional.
> >>>
> >>>I'm interested to hear your feedback on it. 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> larry.potter wrote:
? > 
> > There will always be people that will be willing to close their
> > eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too 
> > late.
> > The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
> > happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with regard 
> > to Nazi Germany.
> > The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media is 
> > working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of 
> > denial at this point of time. 
> 
> Only people who fear death are scared. That's what 
> enlightenment gives us: freedom from fear.  There 
> are smarter ways of dealing with the problem.

Thank you for saying this. It's about time
someone did.

These two guys -- Larry and Robert -- are
AFRAID, that's all. They're so afraid that
they're willing to justify a preemptive
nuclear strike on an entire nation of people 
just *because* they're afraid. And that makes
them EXACTLY like the people they're afraid
of.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Invincibility Course for Lebanon

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 9:37:45 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fact 
  is most of Beirut has been left untouched by Israel, although by > 
  media reports, it looks like the entire city is in shambles. Maps were shown 
  on > a news report this morning pin pointing specific 
  damage.>Interesting. So, by that measure, the 9/11 attack 
  wasn't very severe becuse 99.999$ of New York City buildings were still 
  standing?

911 was unprovoked Spair. New York, nor the rest of the United States was 
housing any terrorist organizations that were attacking anybody else unless you 
want to conclude like Bevin that Osama was only trying to "purify" his 
country.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 7/30/06 5:56 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > It is an odd thing: the idea is to have everyone practicing the same 
> > technique
> > in order to 
> > get a synergistic effect. It's very obvious from the published research 
> > that,
> > no matter which 
> > technique you feel is better, that TM has radically different effects than
> > other techniques.
> > Whiy would you feel a desire to participate in a group practice of something
> > you didn't 
> > think was worth doing?
> > 
> > Are people who used to believe that "TM is best" and who now believe that
> > "my-way-
> > other-than-TM" is best, under the impression that there will be a 
> > synergistic
> > effect from 
> > them doing something other than TM at the same time most people are doing 
> > TM?
> > 
> > The reasoning escapes me.
> > 
> TM researchers say TM is best. If the quality of the lives and personalities
> of TM leaders and many who have been practicing for decades is an indication
> of the efficacy of he technique, then give me Brand X.
>

I didn't say anything about anything save synergistic effects. BTW, the people 
in charge of 
the TM organization are quite nice compared to many, if not most, people in 
similar lines 
of work in other organizations.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "blissbunn1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  If there is a unified field / absolute out there and  all the Sages, Saints, 
> Sinners & yadda 
> yaddas teach techniques that open our consciousness who's to say that there 
> are 
> distinctions that would undermine the shakti that's circulating? Just bring 
> your asses 
into 
> the dome & do your thing. I doubt that the universe is preferential to one 
> viechle for 
> ecstacy over another.

It's an interesting "if" that you mention. DO all the sages teach valid things?

> 
> It'll test the principle.  Fight about who's righteous after everyone shows 
> up and 
> experiences whatever there is to experience. It's the Woodstock of courses.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> > >
> > > on 7/30/06 3:17 PM, scienceofabundance at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry, Sal:) I thought I had included such a variety of BS that
> > > > readers would see it as a parody. I guess it is a measure of what we
> > > > have all seen that your first reaction was to take it seriously.
> > > > Like Rick, there is a snowball's chance in hell that I would be
> > > > accepted into the course unless I lied about myself.
> > > > 
> > > And if I had to lie to get in, as many are doing, I would feel as Groucho
> > > Marx did: 'Personally I wouldn't belong to any club that would have me as 
> > > a
> > > member'
> > >
> > 
> > It is an odd thing: the idea is to have everyone practicing the same 
> > technique in order 
to 
> > get a synergistic effect. It's very obvious from the published research 
> > that, no matter 
> which 
> > technique you feel is better, that TM has radically different effects than 
> > other 
> techniques. 
> > Whiy would you feel a desire to participate in a group practice of 
> > something you didn't 
> > think was worth doing?
> > 
> > Are people who used to believe that "TM is best" and who now believe that 
> > "my-way-
> > other-than-TM" is best, under the impression that there will be a 
> > synergistic effect 
from 
> > them doing something other than TM at the same time most people are doing 
> > TM?
> > 
> > The reasoning escapes me.
> >
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Darshan, The Embrace - ComingSoon.net Film Database

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=14482




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Current TV // Watch & Vote // Hugging Saint by boo3gie

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
http://www.currenttv.com/watch/10192325?s1=staffPickVids&list=staffPickVidsB
yAssignmentGroup&k1=1&k2=0&sid=10192325&fr=0

or http://tinyurl.com/k32pr


Video of Amma being prepared for Al Gore's TV station.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Any 1 know how to contact Peter Ocsody a former Gov.?

2006-07-30 Thread WLeed3





perhaps in Fla & perhaps having a sister formerly in Fairfield they 
both? He now in Fla. perhaps?
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 6:03:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> One  small example, but a way in which the US can still move in the 
> >  direction of peace while realistically protecting our interests. 
> >  
> > These ideas of "I can kick your ass before you kick mine" and "I can  
> > kick your ass so hard, you'll never get back at me" are the most  
> > short-sighted and foolish and damaging policies. Anyone pursuing  
> > such ideas in the government should be removed from office 
> >  immediately! Such stupid and dull thinking.
> >
> 
> Actually, a strong  country should have that as a given, but be so 
> self-confidant that it  
> never needs to be spoken of. That the Bush Administration appears to make  it 
> the heart of 
> their diplomatic strategy is a Very Bad  Thing.
> 
> 
> 
> The Bush administration asked the European community to handle the  situation 
> and negotiations with Iran. They became frustrated with the lack of  progress 
> and insisted the US become more involved. Bush has said all along that  there 
> will be a negotiated settlement. The only thing Bush has said in regards  to 
> force is that military options are not off the table but are a last  resort. 
> And I would bet that was the reason the Europeans asked for US  involvement 
> in 
> the talks.
>

I was about to agree with you until I recalled that "all military options" for 
Bush, includes 
first-strike nuclear ones.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Invincibility Course for Lebanon

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 5:35:49 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> This  might work. Israel is not bombing the wealthy (Christian) 
> neighborhoods of  Beirut, which is where King Tony's family lives, so 
> a safe place (by  Lebanese standards) might be set up there, although 
> it is kind of  unnerving, I'm sure, to hear bombs going off a couple 
> miles  away.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The fact is most of Beirut has been left untouched by Israel, although by  
> media reports, it looks like the entire city is in shambles. Maps were shown 
> on  
> a news report this morning pin pointing specific  damage.
>

Interesting. So, by that measure, the 9/11 attack wasn't very severe becuse 
99.999$ of 
New York City buildings were still standing?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 5:07:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> With the  economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there are a 
> huge amount of  alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even 
> conventional  weapons.
> 
> I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas  
> Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya 
> abandoned  its nuclear weapons program not because of the US invasion 
> of Iraq, but  because behind the scenes we provided them with a 
> security assurance that  if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear 
> weapons] direction, we promised not  to attack them.
> 
> 
> 
> Iran has been offered and continues to be offered all kinds of deals like  
> that, but they refuse them. They insist having nukes is their  right.
>

The Iranian government, even by Iranian standards, is a bit extreme. But not 
TOO extreme.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 3:53:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Well, I  can't speak for her appearance on Donny Duetsch, but on 
> > Hardball it  was quite obvious she was poking fun at liberal thought 
> > processes by  holding a liberal icon up to that light of inquiry.
> 
> "Holding a liberal  icon up to the light of inquiry"??
> 
> Really?
> 
> "The light of  inquiry" is what she was holding
> Clinton up to?
> 
> And since when do  liberals hold people "up to
> the light of inquiry" by publicly speculating  that
> they're gay?
> 
> It's conservatives who tend to think being gay  is
> somehow scandalous and terrible.
> 
> Liberals tend not to think it's  worth bothering
> to speculate about. (Except in the case of  
> conservatives who moralize over what an awful
> threat to society  homosexuality is and then turn
> out to be secretly gay themselves. Then  it's
> their ugly hypocrisy that is really the  topic
> 
> 
> 
> I think you miss the point she subtly made. Either defend the concept that  
> rampant promiscuous  sexual encounters are a sign of latent homosexuality  or 
> defend Clinton for having them. I don't think Ann really thinks Clinton is  
> gay. I don't think many people do.< I've heard a number of times liberals  
> speculating that Condi is "really" gay and a few others as well. Remember the 
>  
> fellow that was accused of being a ringer in the White House press corp for 
> the  
> Administration? He was accused of being gay for no other reason than to try 
> to  
> embarrass the administration. Remember Kerry's comments about Mary Cheney in 
> the  debates? Do you think Kerry was really concerned for Mary Cheney or was  
> hoping he might embarrass the Cheney's on national TV for having a  lesbian 
> daughter. It happens more by liberals than you think and not  strictly to 
> point 
> out hypocrisy.
>

Er, for no other reason? Maybe because he had modeled for a gay escort service 
site that 
he was hosting?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Coherent Consciousness and Reduced Randomness: Correlations on September 11, 200

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/papers/NelsonJSE-v4.pdf





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Critique of the "Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field"

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-0027(199012)34%3A4%3C745%3AAMCOAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23

The test of the effects of the "Maharishi Technology of the Unified
Field" by Orme-Johnson et al. which appeared in the December 1988
issue of the Journal of Conflict Resolution contains several
substantial methodological problems. First, the measurement of the
critical independent variable governing whether an effect should be
found does not correspond to the most obvious interpretation of the
theory, an interpretation used in later studies of the same theory. If
population is measured using geographical radius rather than political
boundaries, the observed effects should not have occurred, yet the
study finds them anyway. In addition, the study did not adequately
control for the possibility of reverse causation (the effects causing
the treatment) or properly test for the possibility of spurious
relationships. Because validation of the theory would contradict
virtually the whole of contemporary understanding of causality in
social behavior, insistence on such additional measurement
specifications, controls, and statistical tests prior to publication
would not have constituted unreasonable "censorship" of the research
in question.


http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-0027(199012)34%3A4%3C756%3ATEOTMT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z
This article replies to a methodological criticism of Orme-Johnson et
al., (1988). The original study reported that participants in the
Transcendental Meditation (TM) and TM-Sidhi program located in
Jerusalem significantly reduced tension in "collective consciousness"
and behavior as measured by decreased conflict in Lebanon and
improvement on several social indicators in Israel. Specification of
the independent variable on the basis of political boundaries rather
than geographical distance alone was shown to be consistent with both
theory and forty other studies. It is explained how "reverse
causation" cannot account for observed effects. Also, reanalyses show
that the results are robust across fourteen alternative transfer
function models. Using a purely objective criterion for model
selection, the Akaike Information Criterion, the optimal model yields
the most significant result (t = 5, p <.0001). Liu's linear transfer
function approach yields similar results. Other robustness checks
(substituting "pseudo" independent or dependent variables) do not
yield spurious results.


http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0037-7732(199712)76%3A2%3C511%3AEHT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L
Active and heterogeneous disciplines constantly spawn new theories and
theoretical variants. By definition, each such offering is heterodox
to the degree that its veracity would diminish accepted theories. Most
often heterodox theories are dismissed out of hand for nonrational
reasons, such that they just seem too bizarre. Most of the time, too,
rational analysis supports such rejection. Of course, many important
theories in science once seemed bizarre but later were accepted as
evidence accumulated for them and against received views. But the lag
between a premature rejection and ultimate acceptance is an
inefficiency built into the theory evaluation process. Is there a way
to reduce this inefficiency? Through examining a heterodox
sociological exemplar, we discuss the standards to which such theories
should be held in order to deserve (1) hearings in their relevant
disciplines, (2) serious attention, and (3) assignment of a high
likelihood of being true.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss





on 7/30/06 7:40 PM, blissbunn1 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

 If there is a unified field / absolute out there and  all the Sages, Saints, Sinners & yadda 
yaddas teach techniques that open our consciousness who's to say that there are 
distinctions that would undermine the shakti that's circulating? Just bring your asses into 
the dome & do your thing. I doubt that the universe is preferential to one viechle for 
ecstacy over another.

It'll test the principle.  Fight about who's righteous after everyone shows up and 
experiences whatever there is to experience. It's the Woodstock of courses.

But even if you’re doing MMY’s program to a “T”, and are only a Citizen Sidha, you won’t be allowed in if they know you visit saints, etc. A friend of mine who fits that description was asked to write a letter promising he wouldn’t see Amma any more, etc. So you either have to compromise your principles, or lie, which should compromise your principles, which I suppose is an appropriate requirement from an organization that doesn’t have any principles.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Critique of the "Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field"

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-0027(199012)34%3A4%3C745%3AAMCOAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23

The test of the effects of the "Maharishi Technology of the Unified
Field" by Orme-Johnson et al. which appeared in the December 1988
issue of the Journal of Conflict Resolution contains several
substantial methodological problems. First, the measurement of the
critical independent variable governing whether an effect should be
found does not correspond to the most obvious interpretation of the
theory, an interpretation used in later studies of the same theory. If
population is measured using geographical radius rather than political
boundaries, the observed effects should not have occurred, yet the
study finds them anyway. In addition, the study did not adequately
control for the possibility of reverse causation (the effects causing
the treatment) or properly test for the possibility of spurious
relationships. Because validation of the theory would contradict
virtually the whole of contemporary understanding of causality in
social behavior, insistence on such additional measurement
specifications, controls, and statistical tests prior to publication
would not have constituted unreasonable "censorship" of the research
in question.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss





on 7/30/06 5:56 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It is an odd thing: the idea is to have everyone practicing the same technique in order to 
get a synergistic effect. It's very obvious from the published research that, no matter which 
technique you feel is better, that TM has radically different effects than other techniques. 
Whiy would you feel a desire to participate in a group practice of something you didn't 
think was worth doing?

Are people who used to believe that "TM is best" and who now believe that "my-way-
other-than-TM" is best, under the impression that there will be a synergistic effect from 
them doing something other than TM at the same time most people are doing TM?

The reasoning escapes me.

TM researchers say TM is best. If the quality of the lives and personalities of TM leaders and many who have been practicing for decades is an indication of the efficacy of he technique, then give me Brand X.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 7:31:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> And JFK  didn't *have* an image as a stud. That
> was a big secret at the time, in  case you've
> forgotten.
> 
> If Clinton was trying to develop an image as  a
> stud, it was his own image of himself he wanted
> to  boost.
> 
> JFK did have an image as a stud.

Not while he was president.

 It doesn't matter when the image was  
> developed. Democrats wanted the Clinton administration to be the
> second coming  of Camelot. It was hyped when he took office and 
> Clinton used to speak about how he met JFK when he was a boy and 
> decided that was going to be his goal, to be president. It wouldn't
> be too far fetched for him to want to emulated JFK  in any way he 
> could.

Depends on where you draw the "too far-fetched" line.
I think that's pretty far over it, simply because there
are plenty of other reasons for him to need to be
promiscuous.

> JFK had Marilyn Monroe, WJC had Sharon  Stone.

Sharon Stone?  Is that another idea you got from
Coulter?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> > Precisely during
> > theHoE, project, the S&P 500 experienced "Black
> > Monday" -- its largest
> > decline, over 30%, in many decades, a strong
> > demonstration of P1.
> 
> The decline was on October 19th. The Heaven on Earth
> course was over by then, by probably around a week.

OK Thanks. 

If anyone has precise dates and numbers by course phase (declining
numbers as courses are prolonged), or dome numbers and dates, or other
ME courses, please let me know. Thanks






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com

2006-07-30 Thread gullible fool

> Precisely during
> theHoE, project, the S&P 500 experienced "Black
> Monday" -- its largest
> decline, over 30%, in many decades, a strong
> demonstration of P1.

The decline was on October 19th. The Heaven on Earth
course was over by then, by probably around a week.
  
--- "new.morning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The analysis continues and is becoming quite
> intersting if not
> fascinating.  Look at the blog. Look at the
> numberous charts before
> you roll your eyes. 
> 
> http://2006-course-effects.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> Long Run Impact of the Maharish Effect on Financial
> Markets  --  the
> Phase 3 Patterns*
> 
> For the three couses, Utopia, Heaven on Earth and
> DC, the phase III
> pattern period respectively lasted 3, 6 and 5.5
> years -- and is
> correlates with 100%, 40% and 200% gains in the S&P
> 500.   
> 
> The phase III pattern of the prior Heaven on Earth
> project came to a
> close with the trend stopping impact of the DC
> project. Upon resuming
> a new phase III pattern, the DC project, IF
> causative**, greatly
> amplified the upward slope of Heaven on Earth phase
> III pattern by a
> factor of 5.
> 
> At this point in the analysis, prudence dictates
> that this be
> identified as an interesting but probably random
> correlation of ME
> project phase III's with rapid market growth.
> For example, the DC project phase III pattern period
> corresponds to
> the internet bubble period.  "How convenient!" any
> rational observer
> would say -- laughing it off.
> 
> However, ME theory predicts that the ME produces
> strong coherence in
> all levels of a society, and should spur innovation
> and breakthroughs.
>  The internet bubble period was a dramatic
> breathtaking period of such
> innovation.  The increased speed and connections of
> people,  things,
> information dramatically transformed how business
> and personal lives
> were conducted.   Quite serious and respected
> financial analysts at 
> major firms bought heavily into the notion that we
> were in a major
> "breakthrough period", a "New Economy", where old
> rules no longer
> applied.  While  such exuberance  was  out  of
> proportion to and
> overshot the reality,  and the market finally found
> its equillibrium
> after the heady high of the "rush" towards the "New
> Economy",  the
> innovations and  breathroughs of  that period were
> quite real and
> dramatic.  And continue today.  Just as ME theory
> predicts.
> 
> Thus, while the ME theory's  predictions on
> financial markets are far
> from being clearly and repeatedly demonstrated in a
> statisically
> significant sense, they certainly have not been
> disproven -- as
> indicated by the highly correlated positive market
> performance
> following these three ME courses.
> 
> More analysis to follow, as data on other ME
> projects is obtained and
> mapped to changes in financial makets.
> 
> 
> *See precceding post on short-term effects of ME for
> an explanation of
> the three phased pattern durning and after ME
> projects.
> 
> ** A casual link has yet to be demonstrated.  All
> that can be said
> currently, at this stage of the analysis, is that ME
> phase III
> patterns are strongly correlated  with  periods of 
> sharp and rapid
> market growth.
> 
> 
>
===
> 
> Summary of Short-Run Stock Market Trends During and
> After Prior Large
> Maharishi Effect Projects
> 
> With only three projects thus far analyzed, its
> possible, probable,
> that the Maharishi Effect has no visible effect on
> financial markets,
> and the following are simply spurious / random
> correlations.
> 
> That said, if the ME does have an effect on
> financial markets, it
> exhibits a pattern repeated for each of the three
> prior largest
> Maharishi Effect projects, DC (1993), Heaven on
> Earth (1987) and
> Utopia (1983-4) are reviewed below. More detailed
> analysis and
> graphics are in Charts 8-13.
> 
> Three patterns or phases (P1,P2,P3 ) emerge upon
> examining short-run
> ME effects on financial markets:
> 
> * market trends flatten or reverse DURING the
> project
> * 2-14 months after the project market trends
> are flat or remain
> within a trading range.
> * after this flat period, trends become
> positive.
> 
> The market remained in a trading range during the DC
> project,
> interupting the prior year's sharply rising market
> trend. Thus the DC
> project exhibits P1 -- it changed from a strong two
> year upward trend
> -- and stopped in its tracks during the project. The
> DC project also
> exibits P2 --for 14 months after the project the
> market remained
> within a trading range -- though a volitle one.
> Three times it rallied
> and declined, trying to break through the lower and
> upper boundaries
> of its range. After 14 months, it finally broke
> through its upper
> bound and transformed into into an upward trend,
> consistent with P3.
> 
> For at least a year prior to the HoE Maharish Effect
> project (400

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread Bhairitu
BTW, have you seen "The Power of Nightmares"?
http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares

larry.potter wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too 
>>is "fair 
>>
>>
>
>There will always be people that will be willing to close their
>eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too late.
>The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
>happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with regard 
>to Nazi Germany.
>The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media is 
>working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of denial 
>at this point of time.
>
>
>  
>
>>and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is 
>>extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity. 
>>Maybe what we can derive 
>>from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the garbage 
>>
>>
>where 
>  
>
>>it belongs.
>>
>>
>
>no, religion is just an excuse, it's not the real issue, the fact is 
>that there are Muslims who are truly peaceful.
>However twisting it by radical Muslims and brain wash their kids is 
>the real issue, hijacking the kid's mind, hijacking the true essence 
>of their religion.
>
>Peace will prevail eventually, the question is how much suffering 
>humanity will go thru before it happens.
> 
>  
>
>>larry.potter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
>>>
>>>
>>>A wake up call.
>>>
>>>We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what 
>>>  
>>>
>extreme 
>  
>
>>>Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope that 
>>>  
>>>
>it 
>  
>
>>>will disappear by itself and stay delusional.
>>>
>>>I'm interested to hear your feedback on it. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread Bhairitu

larry.potter wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too 
>>is "fair 
>>
>>
>
>There will always be people that will be willing to close their
>eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too late.
>The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
>happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with regard 
>to Nazi Germany.
>The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media is 
>working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of denial 
>at this point of time. 
>  
>
Only people who fear death are scared.  That's what enlightenment gives 
us: freedom from fear.  There are smarter ways of dealing with the problem.

>>and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is 
>>extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity. 
>>Maybe what we can derive 
>>from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the garbage 
>>
>>
>where 
>  
>
>>it belongs.
>>
>>
>
>no, religion is just an excuse, it's not the real issue, the fact is 
>that there are Muslims who are truly peaceful.
>However twisting it by radical Muslims and brain wash their kids is 
>the real issue, hijacking the kid's mind, hijacking the true essence 
>of their religion.
>
>Peace will prevail eventually, the question is how much suffering 
>humanity will go thru before it happens.
> 
>  
>
How about overpopulation?  When things start to burst at the seams then 
you have these battles over resources.  I wonder how many burned up 
planets there  are throughout the universe where beings perished because 
they failed to evolve to a state where they could reconcile their 
differences?  There are probably billions.

>>larry.potter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
>>>
>>>
>>>A wake up call.
>>>
>>>We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what 
>>>  
>>>
>extreme 
>  
>
>>>Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope that 
>>>  
>>>
>it 
>  
>
>>>will disappear by itself and stay delusional.
>>>
>>>I'm interested to hear your feedback on it. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 7:31:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And JFK 
  didn't *have* an image as a stud. Thatwas a big secret at the time, in 
  case you'veforgotten.If Clinton was trying to develop an image as 
  astud, it was his own image of himself he wantedto 
boost.

JFK did have an image as a stud. It doesn't matter when the image was 
developed. Democrats wanted the Clinton administration to be the second coming 
of Camelot. It was hyped when he took office and Clinton used to speak about how 
he met JFK when he was a boy and decided that was going to be his goal, to be 
president. It wouldn't be too far fetched for him to want to emulated JFK 
in any way he could. JFK had Marilyn Monroe, WJC had Sharon 
Stone.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Nancy Channing

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steven klayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Anybody know how to contact nancy channing?
> 

2728 Channing Ave? (j/k, old berkely center address)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "blissbunn1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  If there is a unified field / absolute out there 

OH! So THATS where it is. "Out there".







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOUSANDS OF FLYERS

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
"The University does not charge [current coherence] course
participants for campus housing; 

This MUST be a major breakthrough in world consciousness.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread blissbunn1
 If there is a unified field / absolute out there and  all the Sages, Saints, 
Sinners & yadda 
yaddas teach techniques that open our consciousness who's to say that there are 
distinctions that would undermine the shakti that's circulating? Just bring 
your asses into 
the dome & do your thing. I doubt that the universe is preferential to one 
viechle for 
ecstacy over another.

It'll test the principle.  Fight about who's righteous after everyone shows up 
and 
experiences whatever there is to experience. It's the Woodstock of courses.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> >
> > on 7/30/06 3:17 PM, scienceofabundance at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sorry, Sal:) I thought I had included such a variety of BS that
> > > readers would see it as a parody. I guess it is a measure of what we
> > > have all seen that your first reaction was to take it seriously.
> > > Like Rick, there is a snowball's chance in hell that I would be
> > > accepted into the course unless I lied about myself.
> > > 
> > And if I had to lie to get in, as many are doing, I would feel as Groucho
> > Marx did: 'Personally I wouldn't belong to any club that would have me as a
> > member'
> >
> 
> It is an odd thing: the idea is to have everyone practicing the same 
> technique in order to 
> get a synergistic effect. It's very obvious from the published research that, 
> no matter 
which 
> technique you feel is better, that TM has radically different effects than 
> other 
techniques. 
> Whiy would you feel a desire to participate in a group practice of something 
> you didn't 
> think was worth doing?
> 
> Are people who used to believe that "TM is best" and who now believe that 
> "my-way-
> other-than-TM" is best, under the impression that there will be a synergistic 
> effect from 
> them doing something other than TM at the same time most people are doing TM?
> 
> The reasoning escapes me.
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Nancy Channing

2006-07-30 Thread steven klayman
Anybody know how to contact nancy channing?


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 7:09:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> She left  people to ponder whether Clinton was a
> latent homosexual,  actually.
> 
> As I said, her intention was to give her nutjob
> fans yet  another spurious reason to hate Clinton.
> 
> How many people do you know or have heard of that think Clinton
> is a homosexual, really?

None, but then I don't move in nutjob right-wing
circles.  I doubt it occurred to anybody before
Coulter proposed it, but it would be interesting
to take a poll now that she has.

> I used to think he was just trying to develop the JFK image
> as a stud, but later began to think there might actually be some 
> insecurity  about himself.

Well, of course he has some insecurity about himself.
Many utterly straight guys do, and it often manifests
as promiscuity.  But it doesn't have to do with whether
they're worried that they're gay, or with their
sexuality in general, for that matter.  It's a power
thing.

And JFK didn't *have* an image as a stud.  That
was a big secret at the time, in case you've
forgotten.

If Clinton was trying to develop an image as a
stud, it was his own image of himself he wanted
to boost.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 5:07:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> With the  economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there are 
a 
> huge amount of  alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even 
> conventional  weapons.
> 
> I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas  
> Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya 
> abandoned  its nuclear weapons program not because of the US 
invasion 
> of Iraq, but  because behind the scenes we provided them with a 
> security assurance that  if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear 
> weapons] direction, we promised not  to attack them.
> 
> 
> 
> Iran has been offered and continues to be offered all kinds of 
deals like  
> that, but they refuse them. They insist having nukes is their  
right.
>
Could be. 

I just can't paint their geopolitical reality as black and white 
though. Imagine watching Bush go after your neighbor, one that the 
US supported against you in a war. Bush going after your neighbor, 
unprovoked. 

I think what the current leader of Iran says in terms of rhetoric to 
rally his political base (h...sounds familiar...), and the 
desire for nukes are two separate desires of Iran's. The desire for 
nukes I see as a lot more defensive and widely supported than the 
statements the leader makes as anti-Israel.

Just as I saw with the Soviet Union and China when they were our 
enemies, any country that we declare as an enemy are scared to death 
of us, which we then conveniently misinterpret as offensiveness on  
their part. 

We spend more on weaponry than the next 25 war budgets combined. 
Every other country that is not our ally is going to do everything 
they can to appear as big a risk as possible to any thought of 
invasion from us. Hence the mad dash to get nukes. After all, what 
our reaction has thus far shown is that if you have nukes, we won't 
bother you.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread larry.potter
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too 
>is "fair 

There will always be people that will be willing to close their
eyes, dismiss it a propaganda or as minor issue until it's too late.
The video also clearly shows scary similarities between what is 
happening now with Islam and what happened in the past with regard 
to Nazi Germany.
The fact is that radical Islam brain washing machine and media is 
working over time. Unfortunately Europe is also in a state of denial 
at this point of time.


> and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is 
> extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity. 
> Maybe what we can derive 
> from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the garbage 
where 
> it belongs.

no, religion is just an excuse, it's not the real issue, the fact is 
that there are Muslims who are truly peaceful.
However twisting it by radical Muslims and brain wash their kids is 
the real issue, hijacking the kid's mind, hijacking the true essence 
of their religion.

Peace will prevail eventually, the question is how much suffering 
humanity will go thru before it happens.
 
> 
> larry.potter wrote:
> 
> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
> >
> >
> >A wake up call.
> >
> >We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what 
extreme 
> >Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope that 
it 
> >will disappear by itself and stay delusional.
> >
> >I'm interested to hear your feedback on it. 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > To be fair, I should add that Cheney himself had
> > publicly mentioned more than once that Mary was
> > gay.  And she was on his campaign staff, one of
> > his most trusted aides, according to him.  He is
> > on record as favoring leaving decisions about gay
> > marriage to the states, as opposed to the Bush
> > policy of a constitutional amendment forbidding it.
> > 
> > He isn't exactly an activist, but he's obviously
> > not a homophobe or a hypocrite on that issue--
> > except in the general sense that he supports a
> > party that does not support gay rights and that
> > tends to be very homophobic.
> 
> Posted 8/24/2004
>   
> Cheney says he opposes marriage amendment

And one more point: when Republican Senate candidate
Alan Keyes declared that Mary Cheney was a "selfish
hedonist" for being gay--a month before the debate--
you didn't hear any howls of outrage from the Cheneys
or from the right wing generally.

The hoohah--especially from Lynne Cheney--over Kerry's
entirely *positive* mention of Mary being a lesbian
was entirely bogus, in other words, purely political.
It had nothing to do with concern for Mary Cheney's
"privacy."






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOUSANDS OF FLYERS

2006-07-30 Thread George DeForest









July 30: INVINCIBILITY UPDATE





"OPEN THE EYES AND COMMAND THE TREASURY"
"Close the eyes to stir the Constitution of the Universe -- engage the almighty power of Total Natural Law, the Treasury of God -- then open the eyes and . . . cash in! This is your next phase of training: to begin to command the Cosmic Treasury -- to cash in."
 --Maharishi, speaking on what will happen as people stay on the Invincible America Course, and when Marble Colonies are built in Maharishi Vedic City, creating a center of business and untold wealth for Governors and Sidhas 

STOCK MARKET SOARS!
Posts Record Gains During First Week of Invincibility Course
The good news is now in from the first week of our course. The stock market soared this week, posting its highest weekly gain in 14 months! And the price of oil dropped sharply as the U.S. -- in an about face—began working towards a Mideast ceasefire. Here are a few headlines:
CNBC: "Wall Street Euphoria" 
CNBC: "Blissful Shock" 
MSNBC: "Market Sizzles:
Wall Street chalks up best weekly gain since 2005"
The Washington Post: "Oil prices fall as US takes step to end Mideast war" 
I congratulate everyone who has come to the course to create this extraordinary upsurge of positive news. Our numbers have been enough to create a wave of good feeling, national confidence, and euphoria in the markets -- but not yet enough to stop the violence in the Middle East and create national invincibility. 
I know many of you have business and family commitments this summer. But many who are now at the course had similar commitments. They resolved to come despite everything -- and Nature supported their resolve. America needs you in Washington and in Fairfield/Maharishi Vedic City. Please do everything you can to come as soon as possible -- and stay for as long as you can.]
Jai Guru Dev
John Hagelin
NEW MARBLE COLONY TO ACCOMMODATE THOUSANDS OF FLYERS 
The beautiful experiences of bliss from course participants and the astonishing good news coming from the U.S. stock market (see below) inspired Maharishi to announce yesterday a plan to sustain the coherent influence on a permanent basis. Maharishi asked us to quickly build Marble Colonies -- Vastu homes -- in Maharishi University of Management and Maharishi Vedic City, so that one or two thousand more people can come from all over the country and fly as soon as possible. Sidhas can come and live in the new homes, or they can visit for a week or more -- and participate in this "Cosmic Yagya" to maintain a high level of harmony and integration in national consciousness. 

"Let's provide comfortable accommodations with all the advantages of high-speed Internet and video conferencing, so that anyone can come and do long program -- and run their business afterwards." --Maharishi 

URGENT NEED FOR HOUSING -- PLEASE HELP! 
Students are returning to Maharishi University of Management in less than three weeks, and we have to make room for them on campus! (The good news: the number of new students is still growing!) As a result, many course participants will have to move out of dorms rooms. But we don't want them to leave the course! So we are asking EVERYONE who has a home in Fairfield, on or off campus -- whether Vastu or not -- to take in one or more Flyers. (The University does not charge course participants for campus housing; homeowners may do as they wish.) If you have a room or rooms to offer, please email immediately Deanna Freeburg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and give her your details and contact information. (Or use the form in the domes.) This is especially crucial right now as we expect hundreds more people to arrive in the coming days! So please help! 
NEW BUSINESS CENTER OPENS ON CAMPUS
For course participants who need a computer or high-speed Internet connection, or a quiet place to make some calls, we now have a fully equipped business center with everything you need for your business activities. Come to room 119 in the Dreier Building.
WE NEED PHONERS
We are already having such a beautiful effect on the country. But we need more Flyers! We are 2/3 of the way to an invincible, peaceful America -- to our super-radiance requirement of 1730 in the domes. We need volunteers to help call all the active Sidhas who have not yet heard and/or responded to Maharishi's call. We have a phone bank in our beautiful Dreier building, so please come and join us to make calls anytime!

DES MOINES REGISTER
"Stock Market Calmed By Yogis"
(July 29, 2006) The stock market was up over 3 percent for the week. You didn't hear this on CNBC, but the surprising rally was the work of the 1,200 yogic flyers assembled in Iowa and Washington, D.C., over the past four days.
The yogic flyers, it seems, have been creating a "calm and coherence" that's quieting market "fears and anxieties." John Hagelin, the director of the Institute of Science, Technology and Public Policy at Maharishi University of Management, believes this was just the beginning. "As the number of c

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 7:09:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
She left 
  people to ponder whether Clinton was alatent homosexual, 
  actually.As I said, her intention was to give her nutjobfans yet 
  another spurious reason to hate Clinton.

How many people do you know or have heard of that think Clinton is a 
homosexual, really? I used to think he was just trying to develop the JFK image 
as a stud, but later began to think there might actually be some insecurity 
about himself.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Coulter just wants to sell books, make money, and be famous and 
notorious. I 
> don't think there is an ounce of sincerity in the woman. She's a 
pure fake.

Her hatred of liberals--and the Clintons in particular--
is 100 percent sincere.

Read "The Hunting of the President" for what she
did to help bring about Clinton's impeachment.  It
wasn't something she publicized at all.

 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
>  
> > In Coulter's case, there's no "light of inquiry"
> > involved, of course.  Her speculation is absurd
> > on its face.  Her intention is only to give right-
> > wingers another fabricated reason to hate Clinton.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/30/06 6:24:09 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Well,  everybody kids around at times, sure.
> 
> And if you had paid attention to what Ann Coulter said and how she 
said it  
> you would know that is exactly what she was doing. Later in the 
interview with  
> Chris Mathews she was asked if she really thought Clinton was  gay 
and she  
> said "well no, but Gore is a total Fag". Which she very quickly  
said "no  no,  
> just joking." So she actually did say she didn't think Clinton was  
gay. But 
> she did leave people to ponder if rampant promiscuous sexual 
behavior  is a 
> sign of latent homosexuality.

She left people to ponder whether Clinton was a
latent homosexual, actually.

As I said, her intention was to give her nutjob
fans yet another spurious reason to hate Clinton.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To be fair, I should add that Cheney himself had
> publicly mentioned more than once that Mary was
> gay.  And she was on his campaign staff, one of
> his most trusted aides, according to him.  He is
> on record as favoring leaving decisions about gay
> marriage to the states, as opposed to the Bush
> policy of a constitutional amendment forbidding it.
> 
> He isn't exactly an activist, but he's obviously
> not a homophobe or a hypocrite on that issue--
> except in the general sense that he supports a
> party that does not support gay rights and that
> tends to be very homophobic.

Posted 8/24/2004
  
Cheney says he opposes marriage amendment
 
By Susan Page, USA TODAY

Vice President Cheney broke with President Bush on Tuesday on the 
question of same-sex marriage, saying he believes the issue should be 
left to the states. "Freedom means freedom for everyone," he said at 
a campaign rally in Davenport, Iowa.
"Lynne and I have a gay daughter, so it's an issue our family is very 
familiar with," Cheney said as his daughter Mary stood in the 
audience. He said he opposes the constitutional amendment to ban same-
sex marriage that Bush has endorsed.

"But the president makes basic policy for the administration," he 
added.

Cheney's comments were remarkable on several fronts. He acknowledged 
his daughter's homosexuality in a more direct way than ever before. 
While he said in the vice presidential debate in 2000 that the issue 
of gay marriage should be left to the states, he had not publicly 
reiterated that view since Bush's decision in February to embrace a 
federal constitutional ban. 

In fact, administration observers were hard-pressed to think of any 
other issue on which Cheney has publicly disagreed with Bush after a 
decision had been made. 

Read more at:
http://tinyurl.com/3marq 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread feste37
Coulter just wants to sell books, make money, and be famous and notorious. I 
don't think there is an ounce of sincerity in the woman. She's a pure fake. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> In Coulter's case, there's no "light of inquiry"
> involved, of course.  Her speculation is absurd
> on its face.  Her intention is only to give right-
> wingers another fabricated reason to hate Clinton.
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 6:24:09 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, 
  everybody kids around at times, sure.

And if you had paid attention to what Ann Coulter said and how she said it 
you would know that is exactly what she was doing. Later in the interview with 
Chris Mathews she was asked if she really thought Clinton was  gay and she 
said "well no, but Gore is a total Fag". Which she very quickly  said "no 
no,  just joking." So she actually did say she didn't think Clinton was 
gay. But she did leave people to ponder if rampant promiscuous sexual behavior 
is a sign of latent homosexuality.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
> > Remember Kerry's comments about Mary Cheney in 
> > the  debates? Do you think Kerry was really concerned for Mary 
> > Cheney or was hoping he might embarrass the Cheney's on national
> > TV for having a lesbian daughter.
> 
> He intended to embarrass Cheney for the Bush
> administration's stance on gay marriage,
> actually.  His concern was for gay rights in
> general.

To be fair, I should add that Cheney himself had
publicly mentioned more than once that Mary was
gay.  And she was on his campaign staff, one of
his most trusted aides, according to him.  He is
on record as favoring leaving decisions about gay
marriage to the states, as opposed to the Bush
policy of a constitutional amendment forbidding it.

He isn't exactly an activist, but he's obviously
not a homophobe or a hypocrite on that issue--
except in the general sense that he supports a
party that does not support gay rights and that
tends to be very homophobic.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Obsession: What The War on Terror Is Really About ( must see )

2006-07-30 Thread Bhairitu
A propaganda piece.  HonestReporting.com seems to think it too is "fair 
and balanced."  Sure, extremist Islam is a nutty faction but so is 
extremist Judaism and extremist Christianity.  Maybe what we can derive 
from this piece is to grow up and throw religion into the garbage where 
it belongs.


larry.potter wrote:

>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6162397493278181614&hl=en
>
>
>A wake up call.
>
>We can connect the dots and see what terror is about, what extreme 
>Islam is about, or we can keep on closing our eyes and hope that it 
>will disappear by itself and stay delusional.
>
>I'm interested to hear your feedback on it. 
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  
> > Different Woo Woo Rays. Not good.
> > 
> > It is written in ancient texts (sorry, I can't reveal them -- one 
> must
> > under go 20 various rigorous initiations to even look at these books)
> > that when Woo Woo Rays of different paths cross, Woo Woo becomes 
> weak.
> > 
> > And when Woo Woo Rays of different paths are directly shining at each
> > other, thats a Whopping Woo Woo "Whoa"! Woe be unto thee caught in
> > that intersection of different Woos.
> 
> Is there any sponsorship available for these anti-woo woo 
> initiations...:)

Yes, of course. Its all within the pink bubble of bliss. Put your
attention on it and it will reveal to you, at its core, Woo Woo drops
of Abundance. Simple gather up these drops and you can spend them
anywhere -- just like money. Pay your parents your rent with them. pay
for the extension of the present course. Pay your taxes with them.
Bliss On!








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 6:03:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One 
  small example, but a way in which the US can still move in the > 
  direction of peace while realistically protecting our interests. > 
  > These ideas of "I can kick your ass before you kick mine" and "I can 
  > kick your ass so hard, you'll never get back at me" are the most 
  > short-sighted and foolish and damaging policies. Anyone pursuing 
  > such ideas in the government should be removed from office > 
  immediately! Such stupid and dull thinking.>Actually, a strong 
  country should have that as a given, but be so self-confidant that it 
  never needs to be spoken of. That the Bush Administration appears to make 
  it the heart of their diplomatic strategy is a Very Bad 
Thing.

The Bush administration asked the European community to handle the 
situation and negotiations with Iran. They became frustrated with the lack of 
progress and insisted the US become more involved. Bush has said all along that 
there will be a negotiated settlement. The only thing Bush has said in regards 
to force is that military options are not off the table but are a last 
resort. And I would bet that was the reason the Europeans asked for US 
involvement in the talks.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
The analysis continues and is becoming quite intersting if not
fascinating.  Look at the blog. Look at the numberous charts before
you roll your eyes. 

http://2006-course-effects.blogspot.com/


Long Run Impact of the Maharish Effect on Financial Markets  --  the
Phase 3 Patterns*

For the three couses, Utopia, Heaven on Earth and DC, the phase III
pattern period respectively lasted 3, 6 and 5.5 years -- and is
correlates with 100%, 40% and 200% gains in the S&P 500.   

The phase III pattern of the prior Heaven on Earth project came to a
close with the trend stopping impact of the DC project. Upon resuming
a new phase III pattern, the DC project, IF causative**, greatly
amplified the upward slope of Heaven on Earth phase III pattern by a
factor of 5.

At this point in the analysis, prudence dictates that this be
identified as an interesting but probably random correlation of ME
project phase III's with rapid market growth.
For example, the DC project phase III pattern period corresponds to
the internet bubble period.  "How convenient!" any rational observer
would say -- laughing it off.

However, ME theory predicts that the ME produces strong coherence in
all levels of a society, and should spur innovation and breakthroughs.
 The internet bubble period was a dramatic breathtaking period of such
innovation.  The increased speed and connections of people,  things,
information dramatically transformed how business and personal lives
were conducted.   Quite serious and respected financial analysts at 
major firms bought heavily into the notion that we were in a major
"breakthrough period", a "New Economy", where old rules no longer
applied.  While  such exuberance  was  out  of proportion to and
overshot the reality,  and the market finally found its equillibrium
after the heady high of the "rush" towards the "New Economy",  the
innovations and  breathroughs of  that period were quite real and
dramatic.  And continue today.  Just as ME theory predicts.

Thus, while the ME theory's  predictions on financial markets are far
from being clearly and repeatedly demonstrated in a statisically
significant sense, they certainly have not been disproven -- as
indicated by the highly correlated positive market performance
following these three ME courses.

More analysis to follow, as data on other ME projects is obtained and
mapped to changes in financial makets.


*See precceding post on short-term effects of ME for an explanation of
the three phased pattern durning and after ME projects.

** A casual link has yet to be demonstrated.  All that can be said
currently, at this stage of the analysis, is that ME phase III
patterns are strongly correlated  with  periods of  sharp and rapid
market growth.


===

Summary of Short-Run Stock Market Trends During and After Prior Large
Maharishi Effect Projects

With only three projects thus far analyzed, its possible, probable,
that the Maharishi Effect has no visible effect on financial markets,
and the following are simply spurious / random correlations.

That said, if the ME does have an effect on financial markets, it
exhibits a pattern repeated for each of the three prior largest
Maharishi Effect projects, DC (1993), Heaven on Earth (1987) and
Utopia (1983-4) are reviewed below. More detailed analysis and
graphics are in Charts 8-13.

Three patterns or phases (P1,P2,P3 ) emerge upon examining short-run
ME effects on financial markets:

* market trends flatten or reverse DURING the project
* 2-14 months after the project market trends are flat or remain
within a trading range.
* after this flat period, trends become positive.

The market remained in a trading range during the DC project,
interupting the prior year's sharply rising market trend. Thus the DC
project exhibits P1 -- it changed from a strong two year upward trend
-- and stopped in its tracks during the project. The DC project also
exibits P2 --for 14 months after the project the market remained
within a trading range -- though a volitle one. Three times it rallied
and declined, trying to break through the lower and upper boundaries
of its range. After 14 months, it finally broke through its upper
bound and transformed into into an upward trend, consistent with P3.

For at least a year prior to the HoE Maharish Effect project (4000
YFs), the S&P 500 experienced a strong upward trend. Precisely during
theHoE, project, the S&P 500 experienced "Black Monday" -- its largest
decline, over 30%, in many decades, a strong demonstration of P1.
After this significant market crash, the market remained for several
months in a mild trading range, charactersitic of P2. And after
several months of the project and crash, the market assumed an upward
trend, characteristic of P3.

Prior to the Utopia(8000 YFs) project, the market was in a trading
range for three months, after a strong positive trend in the
preceeding year. During the project, there was a 4% "pop

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Invincibility Course for Lebanon

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 5:35:49 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This 
  might work. Israel is not bombing the wealthy (Christian) neighborhoods of 
  Beirut, which is where King Tony's family lives, so a safe place (by 
  Lebanese standards) might be set up there, although it is kind of 
  unnerving, I'm sure, to hear bombs going off a couple miles 
  away.

The fact is most of Beirut has been left untouched by Israel, although by 
media reports, it looks like the entire city is in shambles. Maps were shown on 
a news report this morning pin pointing specific 
damage.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/30/06 3:53:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Well, I  can't speak for her appearance on Donny Duetsch, but on 
> > Hardball it  was quite obvious she was poking fun at liberal 
thought 
> > processes by  holding a liberal icon up to that light of inquiry.
> 
> "Holding a liberal  icon up to the light of inquiry"??
> 
> Really?
> 
> "The light of  inquiry" is what she was holding
> Clinton up to?
> 
> And since when do  liberals hold people "up to
> the light of inquiry" by publicly speculating  that
> they're gay?
> 
> It's conservatives who tend to think being gay  is
> somehow scandalous and terrible.
> 
> Liberals tend not to think it's  worth bothering
> to speculate about. (Except in the case of  
> conservatives who moralize over what an awful
> threat to society  homosexuality is and then turn
> out to be secretly gay themselves. Then  it's
> their ugly hypocrisy that is really the  topic
> 
> I think you miss the point she subtly made. Either defend the
> concept that rampant promiscuous  sexual encounters are a sign of 
> latent homosexuality or defend Clinton for having them.

Huh??  Why should I do either?

> I don't think Ann really thinks Clinton is  
> gay.

No, I don't either.

> I don't think many people do.< I've heard a number of times 
> liberals speculating that Condi is "really" gay and a few
> others as well.

Not *responsible* liberals.

 Remember the  
> fellow that was accused of being a ringer in the White House press 
> corp for the Administration? He was accused of being gay for no 
> other reason than to try to embarrass the administration.

He not only *is* gay, he was a gay prostitute, had
a semi-pornographic Web site advertising his services
(complete with nude photos and, er, measurements, as
well as information about his circumcision status).
He had no serious journalistic credentials, and he was
a right-winger who made a big deal of his Christian
principles.  Again, it was the hypocrisy involved.

> Remember Kerry's comments about Mary Cheney in 
> the  debates? Do you think Kerry was really concerned for Mary 
> Cheney or was hoping he might embarrass the Cheney's on national
> TV for having a lesbian daughter.

He intended to embarrass Cheney for the Bush
administration's stance on gay marriage,
actually.  His concern was for gay rights in
general.

Mary Cheney was long since out, at that point,
by the way.  Kerry wasn't blabbing any secrets.

See, the slur that Kerry wanted to embarrass
Cheney because he has a lesbian daughter comes
from the perspective that having a lesbian
child is something to be embarrassed about.  As
far as Kerry and most liberals are concerned, it
isn't.  To the contrary, having a gay child who
is publicly out and an activist, as Mary Cheney
is, is something to be proud of.

> It happens more by liberals than you think and not
> strictly to point out hypocrisy.

Well, that certainly wasn't what happened in this
case; and I can't recall seeing it from any
responsible liberal for any other reason than to
point out hypocrisy.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 5:07:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With the 
  economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there are a huge amount of 
  alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even conventional 
  weapons.I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas 
  Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya abandoned 
  its nuclear weapons program not because of the US invasion of Iraq, but 
  because behind the scenes we provided them with a security assurance that 
  if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear weapons] direction, we promised not 
  to attack them.

Iran has been offered and continues to be offered all kinds of deals like 
that, but they refuse them. They insist having nukes is their 
right.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, I can't speak for her appearance on Donny Duetsch, but on 
> > > Hardball it was quite obvious she was poking fun at liberal 
thought 
> > > processes by holding a liberal icon up to that light of inquiry.
> > 
> > "Holding a liberal icon up to the light of inquiry"??
> > 
> > Really?
> > 
> > "The light of inquiry" is what she was holding
> > Clinton up to?
> > 
> > And since when do liberals hold people "up to
> > the light of inquiry" by publicly speculating that
> > they're gay?
> > 
> > It's conservatives who tend to think being gay is
> > somehow scandalous and terrible.
> > 
> > Liberals tend not to think it's worth bothering
> > to speculate about.  (Except in the case of 
> > conservatives who moralize over what an awful
> > threat to society homosexuality is and then turn
> > out to be secretly gay themselves.  Then it's
> > their ugly hypocrisy that is really the topic
> > of speculation.)
> 
> Well, liberals are known to speculate that some prominent anti-
> homosexual conservative is in the closet,

Isn't that what I just said??

 but that's a bit of 
> ironic humor, for the most part.

Well, everybody kids around at times, sure.

But I'm talking about serious speculation; and among
liberals, that has to do not with the idea that being
gay is a Bad Thing but exposing the hypocrisy of the
closeted antigay conservatives.  (Typically, in my
observation, the speculation is pretty well founded
when it gets to that point.)

The conservatives are targeted not because they're
gay, but because they're (publicly) antigay.  You'll
rarely find liberals outing a closeted gay person
who publicly *supports* gay rights, in other words,
because there's no hypocrisy involved in that.

In Coulter's case, there's no "light of inquiry"
involved, of course.  Her speculation is absurd
on its face.  Her intention is only to give right-
wingers another fabricated reason to hate Clinton.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/30/06 3:53:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I 
  can't speak for her appearance on Donny Duetsch, but on > Hardball it 
  was quite obvious she was poking fun at liberal thought > processes by 
  holding a liberal icon up to that light of inquiry."Holding a liberal 
  icon up to the light of inquiry"??Really?"The light of 
  inquiry" is what she was holdingClinton up to?And since when do 
  liberals hold people "up tothe light of inquiry" by publicly speculating 
  thatthey're gay?It's conservatives who tend to think being gay 
  issomehow scandalous and terrible.Liberals tend not to think it's 
  worth botheringto speculate about. (Except in the case of 
  conservatives who moralize over what an awfulthreat to society 
  homosexuality is and then turnout to be secretly gay themselves. Then 
  it'stheir ugly hypocrisy that is really the 
topic

I think you miss the point she subtly made. Either defend the concept that 
rampant promiscuous  sexual encounters are a sign of latent homosexuality 
or defend Clinton for having them. I don't think Ann really thinks Clinton is 
gay. I don't think many people do.< I've heard a number of times liberals 
speculating that Condi is "really" gay and a few others as well. Remember the 
fellow that was accused of being a ringer in the White House press corp for the 
Administration? He was accused of being gay for no other reason than to try to 
embarrass the administration. Remember Kerry's comments about Mary Cheney in the 
debates? Do you think Kerry was really concerned for Mary Cheney or was 
hoping he might embarrass the Cheney's on national TV for having a 
lesbian daughter. It happens more by liberals than you think and not 
strictly to point out hypocrisy.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] 911 and the Neocon Agenda Aired on C-SPAN

2006-07-30 Thread Mike Hutchinson
Finally, some mainstream coverage:

C-SPAN to Air Historic 9/11 Exposé 
9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda Panel Discussion to Run on Saturday, July 
29th at 8PM (EST)

Infowars | July 27, 2006

C-SPAN has confirmed that their coverage of the 9/11 + The Neo-Con 
Agenda Panel Discussion will air on C-SPAN 1 on July 29th at 8PM 
(EST). The panel features incredible presentations by 9/11 Scholars 
for Truth founder James Fetzer, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones, 
President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies Dr. Robert 
M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret., Filmmaker and Radio Broadcaster Alex 
Jones, and Terrorism Expert Webster Tarpley.

The appearance of this discussion on the nation's premiere public 
affairs cable network is an incredible boon to the 9/11 Truth 
Movement. None of the 9/11 Truth events that C-SPAN has covered in 
the past are as hard-hitting as the 9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda 
program. This panel discussion cuts to the heart of the issue and 
exposes the events of September 11th, 2001 as a complex premeditated 
plot carried out by criminal elements within the U.S. Government as a 
pretext for launching the endless "War on Terror" in which the globe 
is currently embroiled. C-SPAN's coverage of this pivotal information 
will bring considerable national attention to the 9/11 Truth 
Movement. It will also lend further credibility to the Scholars for 
9/11 Truth, the premiere organization within the movement for peer-
reviewed scientific research on 9/11 issues. 

MORE INFO 
If you don't have cable, you can watch online by clicking here 

See the four-camera Infowars coverage of the Panel Discussion right 
now by becoming a member of Prisonplanet.tv
 
 
 
Each member of the panel brought their own particular perspective and 
expertise to the discussion while each maintained throughout their 
comments that 9/11 was an "inside job."

Alex Jones, a progenitor of the 9/11 Truth Movement introduced the 
panel and acted as moderator. Professor Steven E. Jones, an expert in 
Physics, re-capped his vital new research which has conclusively 
proven that demolition incendiaries were used to bring down World 
Trade Center and could have only been placed there in advance of 
9/11. 

As a Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the 
University of Minnesota and a former Marine Corps officer, James 
Fetzer cut through the myths surrounding the 9/11 hijackers. Former 
Air Force Interceptor Pilot Robert Bowman brought up the lack of air 
defense on the day of 9/11 and shed light on the slough of drills 
conducted on 9/11 to distract the military and prevent Flights 11 & 
77 from being shot down. 

Finally Author and Historian Webster Tarpley tied all of the 
information together to paint a picture of 9/11. He described the 
drills, Bush's actions and the blow-by-blow details of that fateful 
day that revealed what could only be called the horrible truth of a 
conspiracy fact.

It is crucial that everyone see this historic panel discussion on C-
SPAN. Tell your friends and family, email colleagues, and post links 
on message boards. This is an incredible step in spreading the truth 
about 9/11. 

The program will air on C-SPAN 1 at 8PM EST (7PM CST) on Saturday, 
July 29th and then air again for the West Coast at 11pm EST (10pm 
CST).

If you don't have cable you can watch online by clicking here:

http://tinyurl.com/45aff







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Wikipedia

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"  
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The New Yorker's July 31, 2006 edition has a very good article on 
> the 
> > > phenomena of Wikipedia.  It's available on-line here:
> > > 
> > > http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
> > >
> > 
> > Bah: they didnt mention me and Andrew Skolnick.
> >
> 
> **
> 
> http://www.theonion.com/content/node/50902
>

Still no mention that I could see unless you count the Onion article on Sparrow 
Aviation...





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> > >
> > > on 7/30/06 2:05 PM, Robert Gimbel at babajii_99@ wrote:
> > > 
> > > Do you believe in karma? Or compassion? What would be the
> > implications of
> > > wiping out 67 million people and perhaps causing a nuclear 
> winter?
> > Actually,
> > > the latter might be our first payback.
> > >
> > +++ Is it being compassionate to wait till they wipe us out- seems
> > impractical and also too late.  
> > Wouldn't it be a type of suicide which is not good karma 
> either. N.
> >
> With the economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there are a 
> huge amount of alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even 
> conventional weapons.
> 
> I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas 
> Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya 
> abandoned its nuclear weapons program not because of the US invasion 
> of Iraq, but because behind the scenes we provided them with a 
> security assurance that if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear 
> weapons] direction, we promised not to attack them.
> 
> One small example, but a way in which the US can still move in the 
> direction of peace while realistically protecting our interests. 
> 
> These ideas of "I can kick your ass before you kick mine" and "I can 
> kick your ass so hard, you'll never get back at me" are the most 
> short-sighted and foolish and damaging policies. Anyone pursuing 
> such ideas in the government should be removed from office 
> immediately! Such stupid and dull thinking.
>

Actually, a strong country should have that as a given, but be so 
self-confidant that it 
never needs to be spoken of. That the Bush Administration appears to make it 
the heart of 
their diplomatic strategy is a Very Bad Thing.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 7/30/06 3:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of meditation
> > (Amma's and TM 
> > and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem energetically.  I
> > doubt this 
> > would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect in some way?
> > 
> Don¹t know, but around Amma people are doing all kinds of things, and a
> great atmosphere gets created. But I feel the TMO is justified in insisting
> that people in the domes all be doing the same program, as instructed by
> MMY. What I don¹t agree with is that they have any right to inquire about
> anything one might do outside the domes. Most people are rejected merely
> because their extra-dome activities compete with various TMO businesses ­
> Jyotish, SV, other gurus (who raise donations), etc.
>

I can see a certain point to that. The domes would make the ideal networking 
center for all 
businessess New Age. Insomuch as the TMO is making virtually all of its regular 
cash off 
its own brand-named New Age products, I can see a reluctance to allow people in 
who 
might disturb the cash flow.

However, for an "emergency course," it would make sense for them to lighten up 
a bit, and 
in fact, that seems to be what they are doing.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> 
> > Well, I can't speak for her appearance on Donny Duetsch, but on 
> > Hardball it was quite obvious she was poking fun at liberal thought 
> > processes by holding a liberal icon up to that light of inquiry.
> 
> "Holding a liberal icon up to the light of inquiry"??
> 
> Really?
> 
> "The light of inquiry" is what she was holding
> Clinton up to?
> 
> And since when do liberals hold people "up to
> the light of inquiry" by publicly speculating that
> they're gay?
> 
> It's conservatives who tend to think being gay is
> somehow scandalous and terrible.
> 
> Liberals tend not to think it's worth bothering
> to speculate about.  (Except in the case of 
> conservatives who moralize over what an awful
> threat to society homosexuality is and then turn
> out to be secretly gay themselves.  Then it's
> their ugly hypocrisy that is really the topic
> of speculation.)
>


Well, liberals are known to speculate that some prominent anti-homosexual 
conservative 
is in the closet, but that's a bit of ironic humor, for the most part.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 7/30/06 3:17 PM, scienceofabundance at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry, Sal:) I thought I had included such a variety of BS that
> > readers would see it as a parody. I guess it is a measure of what we
> > have all seen that your first reaction was to take it seriously.
> > Like Rick, there is a snowball's chance in hell that I would be
> > accepted into the course unless I lied about myself.
> > 
> And if I had to lie to get in, as many are doing, I would feel as Groucho
> Marx did: 'Personally I wouldn't belong to any club that would have me as a
> member'
>

It is an odd thing: the idea is to have everyone practicing the same technique 
in order to 
get a synergistic effect. It's very obvious from the published research that, 
no matter which 
technique you feel is better, that TM has radically different effects than 
other techniques. 
Whiy would you feel a desire to participate in a group practice of something 
you didn't 
think was worth doing?

Are people who used to believe that "TM is best" and who now believe that 
"my-way-
other-than-TM" is best, under the impression that there will be a synergistic 
effect from 
them doing something other than TM at the same time most people are doing TM?

The reasoning escapes me.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Burbling Globules of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread Sal Sunshine
No problem, it's me that obviously me that needs to get out more!  Thinking about it, I think it's a measure of how well-done it was that anybody took it seriously, even if that anybody was only me. :) What should have been a tip-off is asking for responses to an email address that doesn't allow them.  Really, that's seriously good parody.  

I think you should send it to someone there--might provide a much-needed reality check.

Sal


On Jul 30, 2006, at 3:17 PM, scienceofabundance wrote:

Sorry, Sal:) I thought I had included such a variety of BS that 
readers would see it as a parody. I guess it is a measure of what we 
have all seen that your first reaction was to take it seriously. 
Like Rick, there is a snowball's chance in hell that I would be 
accepted into the course unless I lied about myself. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Invincibility Course for Lebanon

2006-07-30 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Peace For  Lebanon
> We are happy to receive more supporting  emails from those who are 
doing
> their daily program for the peace in  Lebanon. Now the number is 
above 200
> from all around the world, we thank  you all for the Good Support 
that is
> reflected positively day by day.  If you did not send your email 
yet, you
> can do now at the  following link : 
http://maharishitm.org/ppaw/campaign.htm
> Away from what is  happening on the gross level, which we classify 
as heavy
> release of  stress, on the deep level there are many 
purifications  taking
> place, my report of yesterday was full of positive points  that 
are true,
> and soon we will issue a new report for some new positive  
points.  Now we
> are planning to go with our  "Peace For Lebanon" to a second 
phase, we are
> planning to do an Invincibly  Course in Lebanon similar to the 
course in
> USA, Holland Switzerland and  other European countries. the 
purpose of the
> course is to create  invincibility in every country and in the 
whole world.
> This course will be  done in one location where we can all do our 
daily
> program in one place.  We all know the formula explained by 
Maharishi the
> N2 which mean that the effect of the group  program will be 
effected by the
> number of the group the effect will be  equal to the number of the 
group
> multiplied by itself. Now we are around  200 members of meditators 
and
> sidhas, who are doing their programs at  home, the effect could be 
equal to
> 200 units of coherence. While on the  other hand a group of 15 
sidhas who
> are doing their program under one roof  will give an equal effect. 
For this
> reason and in order to have a greater  effect in Lebanon we are 
organizing
> the Invincibility Course.   This invincibility course is open for
> Governors, Sidhas and Meditators who are now in Lebanon, the 
duration of
> the course is structured to be between two to four weeks in 
Residence.   Now
> we want to know urgently who will be  ready to join this special 
course for
> Lebanon. Please send immediately an email to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Best
> wishes  Jai Guru Dev Salim Haddad
> Mobile:  03-258868
>

***

This might work. Israel is not bombing the wealthy (Christian) 
neighborhoods of Beirut, which is where King Tony's family lives, so 
a safe place (by Lebanese standards) might be set up there, although 
it is kind of unnerving, I'm sure, to hear bombs going off a couple 
miles away.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 7/30/06 3:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of 
meditation
> > (Amma's and TM 
> > and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem 
energetically.  I
> > doubt this 
> > would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect 
in some way?
> > 
> Don¹t know, but around Amma people are doing all kinds of things, 
and a
> great atmosphere gets created. But I feel the TMO is justified in 
insisting
> that people in the domes all be doing the same program, as 
instructed by
> MMY. What I don¹t agree with is that they have any right to 
inquire about
> anything one might do outside the domes. Most people are rejected 
merely
> because their extra-dome activities compete with various TMO 
businesses ­
> Jyotish, SV, other gurus (who raise donations), etc.
>

I agree.

As long as people go into the dome to do the program as instructed, 
there is absolutely no cause or justification to ask what they are 
doing outside the dome.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Israel gives an inch?

2006-07-30 Thread Sal Sunshine
And I believe he was considered a moderate!

Sal


On Jul 30, 2006, at 3:11 PM, johnlasher20002000 wrote:

"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation,
and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab
population."

[FairfieldLife] Re: Israel gives an inch?

2006-07-30 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante  
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante  
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Listen to how Joshua and Caleb describe the inhabitants of 
> > Canaan—
> > > the 
> > > > people who rightfully possess the land the Israelites want 
to 
> > > > seize: "Have no fear then of the people of the country, for 
> they 
> > are 
> > > > our prey" (my italics). "Prey"—that's a breathtaking and 
> > sinister 
> > > > word! Again we're reminded that the Torah is not aspiring to 
be 
> > a 
> > > book 
> > > > for everyone. It is not preaching universal truth for all 
men. 
> > It is 
> > > > the work of a single tribe at war with everyone around it. 
> Their 
> > > > enemies were not human: They were prey."
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.slate.com/id/2146473/entry/2146669/?nav=tap3
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > > I'm sorry, but it's just plain silly to pull some
> > > negative-sounding bit out of a scripture written
> > > thousands of years ago, then turn around and point
> > > fingers at the people whose scripture it is and
> > > sneer, See?  See?
> > >
> > 
> > The point I was making was that things have not changed over the 
> > course of thousands of years -- "a single tribe at war with
> > everyone around it."
> 
> Obviously.  That's the "point" I was saying was
> silly.
> 
> > As far as your claim that this is scripture belonging 
> > only to Jews,
> 
> I did not make such a claim, Bob.  Don't put words in
> my mouth, please.
> 
>  that's not true, as the Book of Numbers is part of 
> > both Christian and Islamic tradition. If you don't like the tone 
of 
> > Numbers 13, you probably will also not like Numbers 31, in which 
> > Moses tells his soldiers to kill everybody in an enemy tribe,
> > except virgin girls:
> 
> Says Bob, completely missing *my* point.
> 
> And Jesus said one should hate one's mother
> and father and not even bother to give them
> a decent burial when they die (in a scripture
> that's considerably less ancient).
> 
> You can find things that sound offensive to
> modern sensibilities in virtually any ancient
> scripture.
> 
> We mock Christian fundies for taking the Bible
> literally, then we turn around and do the same
> thing when we want to slam Jews.
> 
> In many if not most cases, such passages in
> ancient scripures are either metaphorical in
> some sense, or aren't the point of the scripture
> at all; or they reflect the way the society
> thought *then*, in a vastly different time and
> vastly different situations.
> 
> As I pointed out to Curtis not long ago, the
> Jews have a long, long history of humanitarian
> ethics and social-justice activism on behalf of
> the poor and oppressed, all grounded in the very
> same scriptures you and he hold up to scorn.
>


http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28676







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Wikipedia

2006-07-30 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"  
wrote:
> >
> > The New Yorker's July 31, 2006 edition has a very good article on 
the 
> > phenomena of Wikipedia.  It's available on-line here:
> > 
> > http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
> >
> 
> Bah: they didnt mention me and Andrew Skolnick.
>

**

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/50902






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Wikipedia

2006-07-30 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The New Yorker's July 31, 2006 edition has a very good article on the 
> phenomena of Wikipedia.  It's available on-line here:
> 
> http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
>

Bah: they didnt mention me and Andrew Skolnick.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> >
> > on 7/30/06 2:05 PM, Robert Gimbel at babajii_99@ wrote:
> > 
> > Do you believe in karma? Or compassion? What would be the
> implications of
> > wiping out 67 million people and perhaps causing a nuclear 
winter?
> Actually,
> > the latter might be our first payback.
> >
> +++ Is it being compassionate to wait till they wipe us out- seems
> impractical and also too late.  
> Wouldn't it be a type of suicide which is not good karma 
either. N.
>
With the economic clout and diplomatic reach of the US, there are a 
huge amount of alternatives to using nuclear weapons, or even 
conventional weapons.

I heard a great talk yesterday between Tim Russert and Thomas 
Friedman, in which Friedman was making the point that Libya 
abandoned its nuclear weapons program not because of the US invasion 
of Iraq, but because behind the scenes we provided them with a 
security assurance that if they stopped pursuing that [nuclear 
weapons] direction, we promised not to attack them.

One small example, but a way in which the US can still move in the 
direction of peace while realistically protecting our interests. 

These ideas of "I can kick your ass before you kick mine" and "I can 
kick your ass so hard, you'll never get back at me" are the most 
short-sighted and foolish and damaging policies. Anyone pursuing 
such ideas in the government should be removed from office 
immediately! Such stupid and dull thinking.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread scienceofabundance
 
> Different Woo Woo Rays. Not good.
> 
> It is written in ancient texts (sorry, I can't reveal them -- one 
must
> under go 20 various rigorous initiations to even look at these books)
> that when Woo Woo Rays of different paths cross, Woo Woo becomes 
weak.
> 
> And when Woo Woo Rays of different paths are directly shining at each
> other, thats a Whopping Woo Woo "Whoa"! Woe be unto thee caught in
> that intersection of different Woos.

Is there any sponsorship available for these anti-woo woo 
initiations...:)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 7/30/06 2:05 PM, Robert Gimbel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Do you believe in karma? Or compassion? What would be the
implications of
> wiping out 67 million people and perhaps causing a nuclear winter?
Actually,
> the latter might be our first payback.
>
+++ Is it being compassionate to wait till they wipe us out- seems
impractical and also too late.  
Wouldn't it be a type of suicide which is not good karma either. N.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of
> > meditation (Amma's and TM 
> > > and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem
> > energetically.  I doubt this 
> > > would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect in
> > some way?
> > 
> > 
> > Different Woo Woo Rays. Not good.
> > 
> > It is written in ancient texts (sorry, I can't reveal them -- one must
> > under go 20 various rigorous initiations to even look at these books)
> > that when Woo Woo Rays of different paths cross, Woo Woo becomes weak.
> > 
> > And when Woo Woo Rays of different paths are directly shining at each
> > other, thats a Whopping Woo Woo "Whoa"! Woe be unto thee caught in
> > that intersection of different Woos.
> 
> You have your terms mixed up.  It is Foo Foo Rays.  Get with the
program or you won't be 
> allowed on FFL. Woo Wee!
> >

Woo Woo Rays are a higher, more refined harmonic of mere Foo Foo Rays.
Where have you been!!! :)










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread wayback71
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of
> meditation (Amma's and TM 
> > and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem
> energetically.  I doubt this 
> > would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect in
> some way?
> 
> 
> Different Woo Woo Rays. Not good.
> 
> It is written in ancient texts (sorry, I can't reveal them -- one must
> under go 20 various rigorous initiations to even look at these books)
> that when Woo Woo Rays of different paths cross, Woo Woo becomes weak.
> 
> And when Woo Woo Rays of different paths are directly shining at each
> other, thats a Whopping Woo Woo "Whoa"! Woe be unto thee caught in
> that intersection of different Woos.

You have your terms mixed up.  It is Foo Foo Rays.  Get with the program or you 
won't be 
allowed on FFL. Woo Wee!
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Fwd: Fw: Fw: Profound statement

2006-07-30 Thread WLeed3





 
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___

--- Begin Message ---
john w freeston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:19:05 -0400From: "john w freeston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Fw: Fw: Profound statementTo: "William Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Richard and Margaret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Ronald .Wieder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"John Tumolo, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Helen Herbein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Gene Diffenderfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Don Loos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Donald Carswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Don Leimester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Carolyn Hildebrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>- Original Message - From: "Charles Copperthite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 7:26 AMSubject: Fwd: Fw: Profound statement> From: "Harold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@webtv.net>Subject: Fw: Profound statementDate: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:41:30 -0400   - Original Message -      Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 4:36 PM  Subject: Profound statementHere's what is the most profound statement we've heard yet about the chaos in the middle East:If the terrorists announced tomorrow morning that they were going to lay down their arms and destroy all their
 weapons, and cease all terrorists activity, what would happen?  The answer is that peace would once again reign throughout the world.ButIf the U. S. and Israel made the same promise...tomorrow morning we put away all our arsenals and destroy them, what would happen?  The answer is that all the people in Israel would be slaughtered and the U. S. would come under attack. I wonder why half the people in this country can't understand that?
--- End Message ---


[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of
meditation (Amma's and TM 
> and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem
energetically.  I doubt this 
> would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect in
some way?


Different Woo Woo Rays. Not good.

It is written in ancient texts (sorry, I can't reveal them -- one must
under go 20 various rigorous initiations to even look at these books)
that when Woo Woo Rays of different paths cross, Woo Woo becomes weak.

And when Woo Woo Rays of different paths are directly shining at each
other, thats a Whopping Woo Woo "Whoa"! Woe be unto thee caught in
that intersection of different Woos.  










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Numbers Near 2000!

2006-07-30 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning  wrote:
> > The ME is accelerating and intensifying the return of past restrictive
> > karma for FF residents -- in order to clear the ground for rapid
> > acceleration of personal and collective consciousness. Duh. :)

The above was a joke. A mimicing of TMO positive spin-talk.
 
> 
> Then by definition the results of the course cannot be measured.
> According to most enlightened masters 

And how was this "measured"








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss





on 7/30/06 3:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of meditation (Amma's and TM 
and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem energetically.  I doubt this 
would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect in some way?

Don’t know, but around Amma people are doing all kinds of things, and a great atmosphere gets created. But I feel the TMO is justified in insisting that people in the domes all be doing the same program, as instructed by MMY. What I don’t agree with is that they have any right to inquire about anything one might do outside the domes. Most people are rejected merely because their extra-dome activities compete with various TMO businesses – Jyotish, SV, other gurus (who raise donations), etc.



__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: Clinton is gay -- Ann Coulter

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Well, I can't speak for her appearance on Donny Duetsch, but on 
> Hardball it was quite obvious she was poking fun at liberal thought 
> processes by holding a liberal icon up to that light of inquiry.

"Holding a liberal icon up to the light of inquiry"??

Really?

"The light of inquiry" is what she was holding
Clinton up to?

And since when do liberals hold people "up to
the light of inquiry" by publicly speculating that
they're gay?

It's conservatives who tend to think being gay is
somehow scandalous and terrible.

Liberals tend not to think it's worth bothering
to speculate about.  (Except in the case of 
conservatives who moralize over what an awful
threat to society homosexuality is and then turn
out to be secretly gay themselves.  Then it's
their ugly hypocrisy that is really the topic
of speculation.)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Why Did We Create Nuclear Weapons?'

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> To the silent ones who haven't commented but who
> feel the same sadness I do at all of this, what 
> a commercial for what decades of meditation can 
> do for a person, eh?

And there is absolutely *no doubt in your mind* that
decades of meditation are responsible for Robert
thinking as he does, right?

Because, as we all know, any effective meditation
technique should cause all its practitioners to think
and behave the same, in ways that are acceptable to
Barry.  Otherwise the meditation can't be any good,
right, Barry?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] "I shall not fight!"

2006-07-30 Thread cardemaister

Sanjaya said: O King, after speaking like this to Lord Krishna, the
mighty Arjuna said to Krishna: I shall not fight, and became
silent. (2.09)

O King, Lord Krishna, as if smiling, spoke these words to the
despondent Arjuna in the midst of the two armies. (2.10)

The Supreme Lord said: You grieve for those who are not worthy of
grief, and yet speak the words of wisdom. The wise grieve neither
for the living nor for the dead. (2.11)

There was never a time when I, you, or these kings did not exist;
nor shall we ever cease to exist in the future. (2.12)

Just as the Atma acquires a childhood body, a youth body, and an
old age body during this life, similarly Atma acquires another body
after death. The wise are not deluded by this. (See also 15.08)
(2.13)


evamuktvaa hR^ishhiikesha.n guDaakeshaH parantapaH .
na yotsya iti govindamuktvaa tuushhNiiM babhuuva ha .. 2\-9..
tamuvaacha hR^ishhiikeshaH prahasanniva bhaarata .
senayorubhayormadhye vishhiidantamida.n vachaH .. 2\-10..
shriibhagavaanuvaacha .
ashochyaananvashochastvaM praGYaavaadaa.nshcha bhaashhase .
gataasuunagataasuu.nshcha naanushochanti paNDitaaH .. 2\-11..
na tvevaaha.n jaatu naasa.n na tva.n neme janaadhipaaH .
na chaiva na bhavishhyaamaH sarve vayamataH param.h .. 2\-12..
dehino.asminyathaa dehe kaumaara.n yauvana.n jaraa .
tathaa dehaantarapraaptirdhiirastatra na muhyati .. 2\-13..








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Israel gives an inch?

2006-07-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante  
wrote:
> > >
> > > "Listen to how Joshua and Caleb describe the inhabitants of 
Canaan—
> > the 
> > > people who rightfully possess the land the Israelites want to 
> > > seize: "Have no fear then of the people of the country, for 
they are 
> > > our prey" (my italics). "Prey"—that's a breathtaking and 
sinister 
> > > word! Again we're reminded that the Torah is not aspiring to be 
a 
> > book 
> > > for everyone. It is not preaching universal truth for all men. 
It is 
> > > the work of a single tribe at war with everyone around it. 
Their 
> > > enemies were not human: They were prey."
> > > 
> > > http://www.slate.com/id/2146473/entry/2146669/?nav=tap3
> > 
> > I'm sorry, but it's just plain silly to pull some
> > negative-sounding bit out of a scripture written
> > thousands of years ago, then turn around and point
> > fingers at the people whose scripture it is and
> > sneer, See?  See?
> 
> Then look at the quotes again of current leaders and those in charge
> of Isreal since it inception in 1949.

No.  We can look at the quotes all we want, but
it would still be silly to try to make a connection
between them and scripture.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread wayback71
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  
> I think Science¹s thing was a parody.
> 
> I¹ve gotten several calls and emails from friends - one from someone I don¹t
> even know ­ encouraging me to apply for a dome badge. They say they¹re
> accepting ³all kinds of people.² Problem with me is, I wouldn¹t tolerate one
> moment of inquisition, unless my inquisitors are willing to submit to one as
> well.

This had me laughing so hard - that you are lumped into "all kinds of people."  
Why they 
are even stooping so low that they are accepting people like you, Rick!!


Actually, I wonder if having people doing different forms of meditation (Amma's 
and TM 
and Buddhist) together would create some sort of problem energetically.  I 
doubt this 
would ever be allowed by the TMO.  Would that weaken the effect in some way?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gurgling Bubbles of Bliss

2006-07-30 Thread wayback71
This was a joke!!  owever, the fact that you took it seriously says something 
about the 
kinds of letters we have all read, received, etc. and the kind of language 
used.  My first 
response was that the author was on the course and manic.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Um, I hate to tell Science this, but most of us are long since past the 
> stage where empty flattery can get turned into $$.  What a pathetic way 
> to encourage "participation"--by hitting up your friends--still.  Don't 
> the "course leaders" who encourage this ever think of *new* ways to 
> pick people's pockets?  I thought there were scholarships. Sadly, 
> nothing ever seems to change with them.
> 
> Oh, and you're welcome. :)
> 
> Sal
> 
> 
> On Jul 30, 2006, at 11:45 AM, scienceofabundance wrote:
> 
> >  They had to suddenly
> > leave, but one  of them suggested writing to this group,  because he
> > said FFLifers were so positive and that it was a big group - so here
> > I am!!! I cannot write for very long because I am using someone
> > else's computer, but any sponsorship would be a very good thing for
> > each of you  to do.  It probably would be easiest if you just write
> > to me at my email address and then I can arrange  for you to call me
> > and send me the  money. THANKS!!!
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




  1   2   >