Re: [FairfieldLife] For Barry 2
Gotta pump up the sagging Apple stock price, eh? ;-) On 09/11/2015 06:38 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5objectid=11511437
[FairfieldLife] For Barry 2
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5objectid=11511437 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5objectid=11511437
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry - here's the gameplan
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Barry, I couldn't sleep until I had a solid gameplan for you, don't let these haters win. You know what they say down here in SC - haters gonna hate. 1) Create a Yahoo email say tm_is_awesome@... and subscribe to FFL. This will really wow the moderator and you will be approved instantaneously. 2) Hide your email address 3) Use this Yahoo alias tm_is_awesome as your base 4) Create a Yahoo alias for every post, use an 8 digit random integer. Use uncle_tantra as the suffix so we know it's you, so say uncle_tantra_12345678 5) Switch alias to this uncle_tantra_12345678, post 6) Switch back to tm_is_awesome, delete uncle_tantra_12345678 and lurk 7) Repeat steps 4 to 6 for every post. That's it, the haters lose. Peace out Barry. And where is the moderator when we actually need him? I shudder to think what horrors this information could unleash on us. Not from Barry of course - I would imagine it's beneath his dignity - but for anyone else with a grudge or mental illness they want to share with the world it's the gateway to troll paradise.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
On 11/27/2014 9:32 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote: I had exactly the same thought about lines crossed. I am even starting to really evaluate my participation here at FFL. Barry is a disturbed man who has really effected this forum. Because of him most useful discussions are either curtailed or participants simply stop posting here. And who can blame them? I am being very serious when I say the guy lives to pollute and he is very good at it. He simply should be kicked off, stopped, told to go away. He crosses lines of personal decency and respect repeatedly. He will the the death of this place. We have all of, what, 10 active posters here? I am not sure if I have ever used this word here but he is a real troll who seeks to pretty much corrupt anything of substance anyone says. The other trolls simply drive by and leave again leaving a steaming pile in their wake but Barry never goes away, he is a constant and he's perverted in very fundamental ways. Who wants to be around something like that day to day? Really, the toxicity of it is quite disturbing. Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick agrees and has the balls to done something about it. /Apparently Barry used to call himself Uncle Tantra for a reason./
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
You just have to read his colourful language about abuse of small babies to see that Judy was right about the Turq all along, he is a sadistic pervert. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : If I was living with him, I would politely, but firmly, ask him to leave, or keep a very sharp eye out - especially with children present. He refers to it, as, colorful language. Then proceeds to put the blame, for his very disturbing thoughts, on those who call him out. Not because we are cult members, but because we are normal, decent human beings. Barry is in denial about this, and that can be a warning sign, too. Judy used to caution about Barry's mental illness. I thought she was exaggerating - Now, I am not so sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
Yes, and he must be relieved not to read my posts, or so he says, because I happen to take this sort of thing, very seriously, and think he should be investigated, or at least have his PC checked out. I don't mind all his other insults, beyond their anti-social nature - there is no substance. But when someone begins associating sex with babies, that gets my attention, and not in a good way at all. There are few lines crossed here, but this is one of them. In real life, I wouldn't let that perv within 100 yards of a child. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : You just have to read his colourful language about abuse of small babies to see that Judy was right about the Turq all along, he is a sadistic pervert. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : If I was living with him, I would politely, but firmly, ask him to leave, or keep a very sharp eye out - especially with children present. He refers to it, as, colorful language. Then proceeds to put the blame, for his very disturbing thoughts, on those who call him out. Not because we are cult members, but because we are normal, decent human beings. Barry is in denial about this, and that can be a warning sign, too. Judy used to caution about Barry's mental illness. I thought she was exaggerating - Now, I am not so sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
Hopefully one of our lurkers in Holland alerts the police in Leiden about this pervert. They could have him in for questioning and check his computer. That would also alert his roommates. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Yes, and he must be relieved not to read my posts, or so he says, because I happen to take this sort of thing, very seriously, and think he should be investigated, or at least have his PC checked out. I don't mind all his other insults, beyond their anti-social nature - there is no substance. But when someone begins associating sex with babies, that gets my attention, and not in a good way at all. There are few lines crossed here, but this is one of them. In real life, I wouldn't let that perv within 100 yards of a child. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : You just have to read his colourful language about abuse of small babies to see that Judy was right about the Turq all along, he is a sadistic pervert. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : If I was living with him, I would politely, but firmly, ask him to leave, or keep a very sharp eye out - especially with children present. He refers to it, as, colorful language. Then proceeds to put the blame, for his very disturbing thoughts, on those who call him out. Not because we are cult members, but because we are normal, decent human beings. Barry is in denial about this, and that can be a warning sign, too. Judy used to caution about Barry's mental illness. I thought she was exaggerating - Now, I am not so sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Yes, and he must be relieved not to read my posts, or so he says, because I happen to take this sort of thing, very seriously, and think he should be investigated, or at least have his PC checked out. I don't mind all his other insults, beyond their anti-social nature - there is no substance. But when someone begins associating sex with babies, that gets my attention, and not in a good way at all. There are few lines crossed here, but this is one of them. In real life, I wouldn't let that perv within 100 yards of a child. I had exactly the same thought about lines crossed. I am even starting to really evaluate my participation here at FFL. Barry is a disturbed man who has really effected this forum. Because of him most useful discussions are either curtailed or participants simply stop posting here. And who can blame them? I am being very serious when I say the guy lives to pollute and he is very good at it. He simply should be kicked off, stopped, told to go away. He crosses lines of personal decency and respect repeatedly. He will the the death of this place. We have all of, what, 10 active posters here? I am not sure if I have ever used this word here but he is a real troll who seeks to pretty much corrupt anything of substance anyone says. The other trolls simply drive by and leave again leaving a steaming pile in their wake but Barry never goes away, he is a constant and he's perverted in very fundamental ways. Who wants to be around something like that day to day? Really, the toxicity of it is quite disturbing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : You just have to read his colourful language about abuse of small babies to see that Judy was right about the Turq all along, he is a sadistic pervert. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : If I was living with him, I would politely, but firmly, ask him to leave, or keep a very sharp eye out - especially with children present. He refers to it, as, colorful language. Then proceeds to put the blame, for his very disturbing thoughts, on those who call him out. Not because we are cult members, but because we are normal, decent human beings. Barry is in denial about this, and that can be a warning sign, too. Judy used to caution about Barry's mental illness. I thought she was exaggerating - Now, I am not so sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
Can we say, karmic rebound? Yes, I think we can. Barry has, unfortunately, designed himself, for a world that is quickly fading away. All types of abuse, fraud, and pettiness, are being exposed, and recognized. Through the rising consciousness of the world, and social media, everyone is becoming effortlessly aware, of *everything*. No more hiding in the shadows, or self aggrandizement, from insults. Everything is out in the open, now. Barry is out in the open, now, and any tendencies he has to hurt others for his own enjoyment, have been exposed, for all of us to read, and archived. Every word. It is quite a coming to judgment for Barry, as he has miscalculated, due to his egotism, and cynicism, the global expansion of consciousness, and the natural strength that provides, for decent people, like those here on FFL. He still lives back in his hippie daze, with Freddie and the dreamers, where pretending a faux coolness was all that was necessary. No growth since, except a parroting of the abuse he suffered, at the hands of Freddie. Yes, the lights are on, and everyone is home. Barry can't find a hole deep enough right now. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Hopefully one of our lurkers in Holland alerts the police in Leiden about this pervert. They could have him in for questioning and check his computer. That would also alert his roommates. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Yes, and he must be relieved not to read my posts, or so he says, because I happen to take this sort of thing, very seriously, and think he should be investigated, or at least have his PC checked out. I don't mind all his other insults, beyond their anti-social nature - there is no substance. But when someone begins associating sex with babies, that gets my attention, and not in a good way at all. There are few lines crossed here, but this is one of them. In real life, I wouldn't let that perv within 100 yards of a child. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : You just have to read his colourful language about abuse of small babies to see that Judy was right about the Turq all along, he is a sadistic pervert. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : If I was living with him, I would politely, but firmly, ask him to leave, or keep a very sharp eye out - especially with children present. He refers to it, as, colorful language. Then proceeds to put the blame, for his very disturbing thoughts, on those who call him out. Not because we are cult members, but because we are normal, decent human beings. Barry is in denial about this, and that can be a warning sign, too. Judy used to caution about Barry's mental illness. I thought she was exaggerating - Now, I am not so sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
I had exactly the same thought about lines crossed. I am even starting to really evaluate my participation here at FFL. Barry is a disturbed man who has really effected this forum. Because of him most useful discussions are either curtailed or participants simply stop posting here. And who can blame them? I am being very serious when I say the guy lives to pollute and he is very good at it. He simply should be kicked off, stopped, told to go away. He crosses lines of personal decency and respect repeatedly. He will the the death of this place. We have all of, what, 10 active posters here? I am not sure if I have ever used this word here but he is a real troll who seeks to pretty much corrupt anything of substance anyone says. The other trolls simply drive by and leave again leaving a steaming pile in their wake but Barry never goes away, he is a constant and he's perverted in very fundamental ways. Who wants to be around something like that day to day? Really, the toxicity of it is quite disturbing. Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick agrees and has the balls to done something about it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
I'm so thankful this Thanksgiving day that ISIS has revealed the ultimate expansion of global consciousness. We've been waiting so long for this revelation.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
oooh, your misery stinks, dude. Open a window... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : I'm so thankful this Thanksgiving day that ISIS has revealed the ultimate expansion of global consciousness. We've been waiting so long for this revelation.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
The only banning I do is spammers. Behavioral issues are Rick's domain. On this day of thanks, I am thankful for my sweetie's swift recovery over the past month. And the freakishly delicious roast leg of lamb with buttercup squash I just inhaled. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick agrees and has the balls to done something about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
The canaries are singing loudly. Must be a sign that the big disaster is at hand. :-D On 11/27/2014 08:35 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: The only banning I do is spammers. Behavioral issues are Rick's domain. On this day of thanks, I am thankful for my sweetie's swift recovery over the past month. And the freakishly delicious roast leg of lamb with buttercup squash I just inhaled. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick agrees and has the balls to done something about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
leg of lamb - I bet that was good! Here it was turkey, dressing, biscuits,
gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato souffle, squash casserole, cranberry
sauce, fudge brownies and pumpkin pie - mighty good too.
From: j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
The only banning I do is spammers. Behavioral issues are Rick's domain.
On this day of thanks, I am thankful for my sweetie's swift recovery over the
past month. And the freakishly delicious roast leg of lamb with buttercup
squash I just inhaled.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick
agrees and has the balls to done something about it.
#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150 -- #yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp #yiv1612834150hd
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp #yiv1612834150ads
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp .yiv1612834150ad
{padding:0 0;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp .yiv1612834150ad p
{margin:0;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-mkp .yiv1612834150ad a
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-sponsor
#yiv1612834150ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150ygrp-sponsor #yiv1612834150ygrp-lc #yiv1612834150hd {margin:10px
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150ygrp-sponsor #yiv1612834150ygrp-lc .yiv1612834150ad
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150actions
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150activity
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150activity span:first-child
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150activity span a
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150activity span
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150activity span
.yiv1612834150underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1612834150
.yiv1612834150attach
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px
0;width:400px;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150attach div a
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150attach img
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150attach label
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150attach label a
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 blockquote {margin:0 0 0
4px;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150bold
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv1612834150
.yiv1612834150bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 dd.yiv1612834150last
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1612834150 dd.yiv1612834150last p
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1612834150
dd.yiv1612834150last p span.yiv1612834150yshortcuts
{margin-right:0;}#yiv1612834150 div.yiv1612834150attach-table div div a
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 div.yiv1612834150attach-table
{width:400px;}#yiv1612834150 div.yiv1612834150file-title a, #yiv1612834150
div.yiv1612834150file-title a:active, #yiv1612834150
div.yiv1612834150file-title a:hover, #yiv1612834150 div.yiv1612834150file-title
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150 div.yiv1612834150photo-title a,
#yiv1612834150 div.yiv1612834150photo-title a:active, #yiv1612834150
div.yiv1612834150photo-title a:hover, #yiv1612834150
div.yiv1612834150photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1612834150
div#yiv1612834150ygrp-mlmsg #yiv1612834150ygrp-msg p a
span.yiv1612834150yshortcuts
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv1612834150
.yiv1612834150green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150MsoNormal
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv1612834150 o {font-size:0;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150photos div div {border:1px solid
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150photos div label
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv1612834150
#yiv1612834150reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv1612834150 .yiv1612834150replbq
{margin:4px;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-actbar div a:first-child
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1612834150 #yiv1612834150ygrp-mlmsg
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv1612834150
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
How southern: biscuits and gravy! I was winging it today and probably a little happy I didn't get an invite. My nephew hosts Thanksgiving every two years and spends the alternate year with his in-laws. I could have hosted but they would have been disappointed they couldn't watch sports since I cut the cable. Anyway, I was happy because I've been experimenting with Michael Tierra's Endurance formula which is cooling and increases yin. Found I'm getting by with far less food and watching the weight drop but have plenty of energy. Pitta formulas never worked this well. But I had stocked up on some of the goodies that appear around this time and fixed some stuffing, mashed potatoes and heated up some pumpkin soup. For protein I discovered that Safeway now carries Old Wisconsin turkey bites so grabbed a package of those (no msg). (Oh and BTW, I happen to like biscuits and gravy). On 11/27/2014 03:16 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: leg of lamb - I bet that was good! Here it was turkey, dressing, biscuits, gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato souffle, squash casserole, cranberry sauce, fudge brownies and pumpkin pie - mighty good too. *From:* j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:35 AM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies The only banning I do is spammers. Behavioral issues are Rick's domain. On this day of thanks, I am thankful for my sweetie's swift recovery over the past month. And the freakishly delicious roast leg of lamb with buttercup squash I just inhaled. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick agrees and has the balls to done something about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
I admit I did not make the dressing from scratch - I used Whole Foods 365
stuffing mix - it was quite good, with a little added juice from the turkey
breast I did in my slow cooker which came out superb.
From: Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
How southern: biscuits and gravy! I was winging it today and probably a
little happy I didn't get an invite. My nephew hosts Thanksgiving every two
years and spends the alternate year with his in-laws. I could have hosted but
they would have been disappointed they couldn't watch sports since I cut the
cable.
Anyway, I was happy because I've been experimenting with Michael Tierra's
Endurance formula which is cooling and increases yin. Found I'm getting by
with far less food and watching the weight drop but have plenty of energy.
Pitta formulas never worked this well. But I had stocked up on some of the
goodies that appear around this time and fixed some stuffing, mashed potatoes
and heated up some pumpkin soup. For protein I discovered that Safeway now
carries Old Wisconsin turkey bites so grabbed a package of those (no msg).
(Oh and BTW, I happen to like biscuits and gravy).
On 11/27/2014 03:16 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
leg of lamb - I bet that was good! Here it was turkey, dressing, biscuits,
gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato souffle, squash casserole, cranberry
sauce, fudge brownies and pumpkin pie - mighty good too.
From: j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
The only banning I do is spammers. Behavioral issues are Rick's domain.
On this day of thanks, I am thankful for my sweetie's swift recovery over the
past month. And the freakishly delicious roast leg of lamb with buttercup
squash I just inhaled.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Alex has banned others for smaller offences. It remains to be seen if Rick
agrees and has the balls to done something about it.
#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981 -- #yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp #yiv3907266981hd
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp #yiv3907266981ads
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp .yiv3907266981ad
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp .yiv3907266981ad p
{margin:0;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981ygrp-mkp .yiv3907266981ad a
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981ygrp-sponsor
#yiv3907266981ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981ygrp-sponsor #yiv3907266981ygrp-lc #yiv3907266981hd {margin:10px
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981ygrp-sponsor #yiv3907266981ygrp-lc .yiv3907266981ad
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981actions
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981activity
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3907266981
#yiv3907266981activity span:first-child
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981activity span a
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981activity span
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3907266981 #yiv3907266981activity span
.yiv3907266981underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3907266981
.yiv3907266981attach
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px
0;width:400px;}#yiv3907266981 .yiv3907266981attach div a
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3907266981 .yiv3907266981attach img
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3907266981 .yiv3907266981attach label
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv3907266981 .yiv3907266981attach label a
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3907266981 blockquote {margin:0 0 0
4px;}#yiv3907266981 .yiv3907266981bold
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv3907266981
.yiv3907266981bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3907266981 dd.yiv3907266981last
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3907266981 dd.yiv3907266981last p
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3907266981
dd.yiv3907266981last p span.yiv3907266981yshortcuts
{margin-right:0;}#yiv3907266981 div.yiv3907266981attach-table div div a
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3907266981
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, and his soon to be ex-roomies
If I was living with him, I would politely, but firmly, ask him to leave, or keep a very sharp eye out - especially with children present. He refers to it, as, colorful language. Then proceeds to put the blame, for his very disturbing thoughts, on those who call him out. Not because we are cult members, but because we are normal, decent human beings. Barry is in denial about this, and that can be a warning sign, too. Judy used to caution about Barry's mental illness. I thought she was exaggerating - Now, I am not so sure. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Anyone who uses such language is seriously disturbed. I just hope he doesn't harm that small child he is often photographed with. Someone oughta call the cops on him, and at least check his hard drive for kiddie porn. Let's just hope he's drunk. I thought I'd seen the worst of him on FFL but he's starting to show us more and more of what he's got inside of him.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Walks On The Wild Side
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Based on this last post of his, it looks like Barry is getting ready, to Walk On The Wild Side. His life must be like that of a prisoner, where after so many years of no access, or possibility, of sexual relations with women, his gaze begins to wander... You go, Girl! Well, he certainly possesses the man boobs for it. (Or have I gone too far?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KaWSOlASWc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KaWSOlASWc ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : To be honest, I'd rather hear him expostulate on what value posing as a woman for several months had in helping him realize his enlightenment. Is this a technique he would suggest to other people interested in becoming enlightened? And if so, should they cross-dress only when posting on the Internet, or should they dress in drag when at work, shopping, going to church, and on other occasions? I think that many who are interested in enlightenment would also be interested in why, once he achieved his enlightenment by pretending to be a woman for so long, he's never admitted to having done it. One would think that an enlightened being who has come up with such an innovative sadhana as Cross-Dressing For Enlightenment would want to talk it up to all who would listen. What serious seeker would *not* want to know, for example, how Jimbo managed to conceal his occasional dhoti-tents while dressed as a woman. I'm sure they'd also be fascinated to hear how he made his decisions about which public restroom to use, how to dress when swimming in public, etc. It just doesn't feel right that a person who owes his enlightenment to such a revolutionary technique as pretending to be a member of the opposite sex clams up and refuses to talk about it every time the subject comes up. It's almost as if by doing this he's saying, Hey...cross-dressing worked for *me* and was one of the key techniques that allowed me to become so much better and more evolved than all of you. But if you think I'm going to share the secrets of my patented Drag Queen Yoga™ with you for free, fuggedaboudit. You'll have to shell out the big bucks, just like Catholics do when seeking advice from the guys in *that* church who wear dresses. From: anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:43 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] All Beings Enlightened One of the things mentioned about Buddha's enlightenment is that at that moment he said that 'all beings were simultaneously enlightened with his awakening'. The phrase is translated in different ways but they all basically say the same thing, that with awakening all beings were perceived as enlightened. I presume Jim can clarify what this means.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Walks On The Wild Side
I wonder if it makes your nipples perkier, and more sensitive, as a man with a full rack?? ...Barry accidentally brushing frontally against large hedges, parking meters, and the like, squealing, almost silently, with each encounter, then quickly, into the next pub. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Based on this last post of his, it looks like Barry is getting ready, to Walk On The Wild Side. His life must be like that of a prisoner, where after so many years of no access, or possibility, of sexual relations with women, his gaze begins to wander... You go, Girl! Well, he certainly possesses the man boobs for it. (Or have I gone too far?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KaWSOlASWc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KaWSOlASWc ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : To be honest, I'd rather hear him expostulate on what value posing as a woman for several months had in helping him realize his enlightenment. Is this a technique he would suggest to other people interested in becoming enlightened? And if so, should they cross-dress only when posting on the Internet, or should they dress in drag when at work, shopping, going to church, and on other occasions? I think that many who are interested in enlightenment would also be interested in why, once he achieved his enlightenment by pretending to be a woman for so long, he's never admitted to having done it. One would think that an enlightened being who has come up with such an innovative sadhana as Cross-Dressing For Enlightenment would want to talk it up to all who would listen. What serious seeker would *not* want to know, for example, how Jimbo managed to conceal his occasional dhoti-tents while dressed as a woman. I'm sure they'd also be fascinated to hear how he made his decisions about which public restroom to use, how to dress when swimming in public, etc. It just doesn't feel right that a person who owes his enlightenment to such a revolutionary technique as pretending to be a member of the opposite sex clams up and refuses to talk about it every time the subject comes up. It's almost as if by doing this he's saying, Hey...cross-dressing worked for *me* and was one of the key techniques that allowed me to become so much better and more evolved than all of you. But if you think I'm going to share the secrets of my patented Drag Queen Yoga™ with you for free, fuggedaboudit. You'll have to shell out the big bucks, just like Catholics do when seeking advice from the guys in *that* church who wear dresses. From: anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:43 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] All Beings Enlightened One of the things mentioned about Buddha's enlightenment is that at that moment he said that 'all beings were simultaneously enlightened with his awakening'. The phrase is translated in different ways but they all basically say the same thing, that with awakening all beings were perceived as enlightened. I presume Jim can clarify what this means.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry during his last picnic
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : No wonder the dude is so cranky... Oh Lord, you've done it again.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry during his last picnic
The funny part is I just feel like running with it, today. I'll soon get tired of berating the old wreck, but for now, game on. PS It is raining like crazy outside - Yay!!! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : No wonder the dude is so cranky... Oh Lord, you've done it again.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
And people wonder why I publish using pseudonyms. It's because of the stalkers, dummy. :-) From: s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 2:54 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist Now he is a science writer. Do you have a list of the books that Barry has had published? Are they available on Amazon? Perhaps all his literary endeavors are works in progress . . .
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
On 11/20/2014 7:44 PM, fleetwood_macncheese wrote: Honestly, I believe Barry to be incredibly naive, culturally unsophisticated, and with no greater than average intelligence. A perfect candidate for hypnosis, and/or mood-making, around all this levitation nonsense he has dreamed up. He cannot explain it, because it simply never happened. Poor guy. /It doesn't matter to me what Barry does or thinks - all I'm responding to are the hypocritical and prejudiced statements he posts almost every day. Otherwise it's all just grist for the mill now - without The Corrector around to help us moderate these guys. Seriously, it's not that I don't like the guy - I've never met him, it's the arrogant taunting and elitism that grates on me and the exaggeration, puffing himself up. Plus, he makes himself the largest target around - he deserves to be reminded that he's not so special and he doesn't have all the answers. The way I see it, my job is not to answer questions, but to question answers. Every statement, when taken to extremes, will be found to be self-contradictory./ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote : How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the ground? Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible. Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences. Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.) It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating - though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was floating mid-air. That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the /memory/ of having seen the master float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself - the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states. So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz? Maybe someone has another explanation?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
On 11/21/2014 2:37 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote: */And people wonder why I publish using pseudonyms./* /That would explain why you signed some of your writings with //Barry Wright. / */It's because of the stalkers, dummy. :-)/* /Cognitive dissonance. You invited us to read your web site, Barry. http://www.ramalila.net/RoadTripMind/rtm03.html / *From:* s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, November 21, 2014 2:54 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist /Now he is a science writer./ / / Do you have a list of the books that Barry has had published? Are they available on Amazon? Perhaps all his literary endeavors are works in progress . . .// / / / /
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Richard, I genuinely think that if everybody ignored negative posts, eventually
they would stop. And it's possible to be supportive to someone being attacked
without attacking the attacker.
From: 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
On 11/20/2014 7:44 PM, fleetwood_macncheese wrote:
Honestly, I believe Barry to be incredibly naive, culturally
unsophisticated, and with no greater than average intelligence. A perfect
candidate for hypnosis, and/or mood-making, around all this levitation nonsense
he has dreamed up. He cannot explain it, because it simply never happened. Poor
guy.
It doesn't matter to me what Barry does or thinks - all I'm responding to are
the hypocritical and prejudiced statements he posts almost every day. Otherwise
it's all just grist for the mill now - without The Corrector around to help us
moderate these guys.
Seriously, it's not that I don't like the guy - I've never met him, it's the
arrogant taunting and elitism that grates on me and the exaggeration, puffing
himself up.
Plus, he makes himself the largest target around - he deserves to be reminded
that he's not so special and he doesn't have all the answers.
The way I see it, my job is not to answer questions, but to question answers.
Every statement, when taken to extremes, will be found to be self-contradictory.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :
How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the
ground?
Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by
Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible.
Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an
institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable
subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences.
Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the
testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.)
It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual
hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was
invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating -
though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down
the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was
floating mid-air.
That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a
post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master
float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself
- the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of
people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in
his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been
into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states.
So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz?
Maybe someone has another explanation?
#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922 -- #yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp #yiv0085335922hd
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp #yiv0085335922ads
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp .yiv0085335922ad
{padding:0 0;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp .yiv0085335922ad p
{margin:0;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922ygrp-mkp .yiv0085335922ad a
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0085335922ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922ygrp-sponsor #yiv0085335922ygrp-lc #yiv0085335922hd {margin:10px
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922ygrp-sponsor #yiv0085335922ygrp-lc .yiv0085335922ad
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922actions
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922activity
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv0085335922
#yiv0085335922activity span:first-child
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922activity span a
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922activity span
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv0085335922 #yiv0085335922activity span
.yiv0085335922underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0085335922
.yiv0085335922attach
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Pardon my French, Share, but are you fucking kidding me? What did jr or s3, do, or not do, that caused Barry to go off on both of them?? What has Richard done, that calls for the filthy language that Barry uses against him? You are going to have to do a whole lot better than blame the victim. I don't understand why it is inappropriate to react to Barry as any normal, socially well adjusted person would? Why you want to protect him, from the natural results of his actions, seems a bit twisted, and no help to anyone. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I genuinely think that if everybody ignored negative posts, eventually they would stop. And it's possible to be supportive to someone being attacked without attacking the attacker. From: 'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:50 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist On 11/20/2014 7:44 PM, fleetwood_macncheese wrote: Honestly, I believe Barry to be incredibly naive, culturally unsophisticated, and with no greater than average intelligence. A perfect candidate for hypnosis, and/or mood-making, around all this levitation nonsense he has dreamed up. He cannot explain it, because it simply never happened. Poor guy. It doesn't matter to me what Barry does or thinks - all I'm responding to are the hypocritical and prejudiced statements he posts almost every day. Otherwise it's all just grist for the mill now - without The Corrector around to help us moderate these guys. Seriously, it's not that I don't like the guy - I've never met him, it's the arrogant taunting and elitism that grates on me and the exaggeration, puffing himself up. Plus, he makes himself the largest target around - he deserves to be reminded that he's not so special and he doesn't have all the answers. The way I see it, my job is not to answer questions, but to question answers. Every statement, when taken to extremes, will be found to be self-contradictory. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... wrote : How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the ground? Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible. Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences. Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.) It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating - though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was floating mid-air. That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself - the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states. So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz? Maybe someone has another explanation?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Fleetwood, simply support the people being attacked and ignore the attacker. I
don't know why he goes off on Richard or John who I think are both bright
lights here. I did think he was pretty civil towards Seraph. And I still see
him as the bear with the thorn in his paw and you guys are poking at him with
sticks. Doesn't help imo.
From: fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Pardon my French, Share, but are you fucking kidding me? What did jr or s3,
do, or not do, that caused Barry to go off on both of them?? What has Richard
done, that calls for the filthy language that Barry uses against him? You are
going to have to do a whole lot better than blame the victim.
I don't understand why it is inappropriate to react to Barry as any normal,
socially well adjusted person would? Why you want to protect him, from the
natural results of his actions, seems a bit twisted, and no help to anyone.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Richard, I genuinely think that if everybody ignored negative posts, eventually
they would stop. And it's possible to be supportive to someone being attacked
without attacking the attacker.
From: 'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
On 11/20/2014 7:44 PM, fleetwood_macncheese wrote:
Honestly, I believe Barry to be incredibly naive, culturally
unsophisticated, and with no greater than average intelligence. A perfect
candidate for hypnosis, and/or mood-making, around all this levitation nonsense
he has dreamed up. He cannot explain it, because it simply never happened. Poor
guy.
It doesn't matter to me what Barry does or thinks - all I'm responding to are
the hypocritical and prejudiced statements he posts almost every day. Otherwise
it's all just grist for the mill now - without The Corrector around to help us
moderate these guys.
Seriously, it's not that I don't like the guy - I've never met him, it's the
arrogant taunting and elitism that grates on me and the exaggeration, puffing
himself up.
Plus, he makes himself the largest target around - he deserves to be reminded
that he's not so special and he doesn't have all the answers.
The way I see it, my job is not to answer questions, but to question answers.
Every statement, when taken to extremes, will be found to be self-contradictory.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :
How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the
ground?
Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by
Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible.
Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an
institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable
subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences.
Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the
testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.)
It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual
hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was
invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating -
though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down
the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was
floating mid-air.
That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a
post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master
float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself
- the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of
people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in
his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been
into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states.
So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz?
Maybe someone has another explanation?
#yiv7446231118 #yiv7446231118 -- #yiv7446231118ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7446231118
#yiv7446231118ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7446231118
#yiv7446231118ygrp-mkp #yiv7446231118hd
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0;}#yiv7446231118 #yiv7446231118ygrp-mkp #yiv7446231118ads
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7446231118 #yiv7446231118ygrp-mkp .yiv7446231118ad
{padding:0 0;}#yiv7446231118 #yiv7446231118ygrp-mkp .yiv7446231118ad p
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
He intrudes unpleasantly, and sometimes a stick is all the bear understands. He referred to Seraphita as an idiot, as I recall. Out of the blue. Your standards for social interaction, seem a lot lower than mine, and 99% of the active participants here. The other point is that wounded bear, or not, Barry is an adult in his 70's, and not the injured manchild you make him out to be. The rest of us must live in the world, too, and if someone that age, who should damned well know better, is behaving in a mean and childish way, I will let them know. No problem. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, simply support the people being attacked and ignore the attacker. I don't know why he goes off on Richard or John who I think are both bright lights here. I did think he was pretty civil towards Seraph. And I still see him as the bear with the thorn in his paw and you guys are poking at him with sticks. Doesn't help imo. From: fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist Pardon my French, Share, but are you fucking kidding me? What did jr or s3, do, or not do, that caused Barry to go off on both of them?? What has Richard done, that calls for the filthy language that Barry uses against him? You are going to have to do a whole lot better than blame the victim. I don't understand why it is inappropriate to react to Barry as any normal, socially well adjusted person would? Why you want to protect him, from the natural results of his actions, seems a bit twisted, and no help to anyone. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I genuinely think that if everybody ignored negative posts, eventually they would stop. And it's possible to be supportive to someone being attacked without attacking the attacker. From: 'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:50 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist On 11/20/2014 7:44 PM, fleetwood_macncheese wrote: Honestly, I believe Barry to be incredibly naive, culturally unsophisticated, and with no greater than average intelligence. A perfect candidate for hypnosis, and/or mood-making, around all this levitation nonsense he has dreamed up. He cannot explain it, because it simply never happened. Poor guy. It doesn't matter to me what Barry does or thinks - all I'm responding to are the hypocritical and prejudiced statements he posts almost every day. Otherwise it's all just grist for the mill now - without The Corrector around to help us moderate these guys. Seriously, it's not that I don't like the guy - I've never met him, it's the arrogant taunting and elitism that grates on me and the exaggeration, puffing himself up. Plus, he makes himself the largest target around - he deserves to be reminded that he's not so special and he doesn't have all the answers. The way I see it, my job is not to answer questions, but to question answers. Every statement, when taken to extremes, will be found to be self-contradictory. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... wrote : How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the ground? Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible. Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences. Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.) It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating - though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was floating mid-air. That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself - the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states
[FairfieldLife] Dear Barry, was There IS someone on FFL dumber than JohnR !!!
/Dear Barry,// // //As a friend, let me take this opportunity to let you know that you are acting like a ten-year old child. Is this all you can think of to post to a spiritual discussion group? // //It looks like the votes are in, Barry, almost everyone on this list thinks you are trolling. Which is kind of funny, since for ten years you've been calling me the troll. Go figure./ /Hint:***NOBODY CARES IF JIM CLAIMS HE IS ENLIGHTENED OR NOT.*/ On 11/20/2014 6:59 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote: */I have to thank the person who just forwarded a quote from Jimbo The Faux Enlightened to me, cuz otherwise I wouldn't have seen it and laughed this hard. The quote was:/* */ /* *Good example is Barry's naked and raw envy of my enlightened state.* */ /* */I really LOVE this, because it actually tops JohnR's ludicrous and clueless, Atheists are really angry at God quote. That one was laughable because he managed to convince himself that people who don't believe in a God are really angry at the being they don't believe exists. I foolishly thought that nothing could *possibly* be more stupid than that. /* */ /* */But now comes Jimbo's quote, putting JohnR's in the shade. :-)/* */ /* */The person WHO CANNOT PRODUCE A *SINGLE PERSON* WHO BELIEVES HE IS ENLIGHTENED somehow wants you to believe that I am *envious* of him for being enlightened. /* */ /* */Did these people spend their time in meditation sniffing glue? What *happened* to their brains to make them this dense? I've honestly met more intelligent turnips. :-) :-) :-)/* */ /* */Free clue, Mr. Enlightened Trailer Trash -- NO ONE believes you are enlightened. Thus NO ONE is in any way envious of your enlightened state. You're just demonstrating the extent of your narcissism. /* */ /*
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
S3, I think Barry is hallucinating most of the time. That's why he's quoting some words which he thinks came from me. To tell you the truth, I have no idea where he got that crap from. Similarly, he's more likely telling us the same thing about Lenz. IOW he saw things that never occurred. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote : How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the ground? Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible. Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences. Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.) It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating - though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was floating mid-air. That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself - the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states. So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz? Maybe someone has another explanation?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
On 11/20/2014 5:05 PM, jr_esq wrote: I think Barry is hallucinating most of the time. That's why he's quoting some words which he thinks came from me. /Maybe he is so desperate for attention that he felt he needed to make up stuff, to make himself look superior to everyone else. / To tell you the truth, I have no idea where he got that crap from. /Maybe he felt that his writing just didn't stand on it's own, so he thought he would embellish his spiritual status. / Similarly, he's more likely telling us the same thing about Lenz. /He does seem to take a certain pride in his past spiritual endeavors. / IOW he saw things that never occurred. /The problem is his cognitive dissonance. You know he probably once believed in Rama or he wouldn't have spent all that time following Lenz around and paying his hotel and airfare - and tithing 20% of his weekly paycheck to the group. /// There's no way he is going to back down now, after investing so much. ///Barry was so far into the trance induction that he actually put up a whole web site dedicated to the teachings of Fred Lenz and invited us to view it - now he doesn't want to talk about it. ///Go figure./// // //The funny thing about Barry is that he threw both of his teachers under the bus, just to get back at Judy. //Now he is a science writer who doesn't even believe in the Big Bang./ /Barry seems to be so mixed up these days that I don't know how he even makes it to the local bar to get on the free Wi-Fi./
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Honestly, I believe Barry to be incredibly naive, culturally unsophisticated, and with no greater than average intelligence. A perfect candidate for hypnosis, and/or mood-making, around all this levitation nonsense he has dreamed up. He cannot explain it, because it simply never happened. Poor guy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote : How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the ground? Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible. Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences. Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.) It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating - though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was floating mid-air. That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself - the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states. So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz? Maybe someone has another explanation?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Now he is a science writer. Do you have a list of the books that Barry has had published? Are they available on Amazon? Perhaps all his literary endeavors are works in progress . . . ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 11/20/2014 5:05 PM, jr_esq wrote: I think Barry is hallucinating most of the time. That's why he's quoting some words which he thinks came from me. Maybe he is so desperate for attention that he felt he needed to make up stuff, to make himself look superior to everyone else. To tell you the truth, I have no idea where he got that crap from. Maybe he felt that his writing just didn't stand on it's own, so he thought he would embellish his spiritual status. Similarly, he's more likely telling us the same thing about Lenz. He does seem to take a certain pride in his past spiritual endeavors. IOW he saw things that never occurred. The problem is his cognitive dissonance. You know he probably once believed in Rama or he wouldn't have spent all that time following Lenz around and paying his hotel and airfare - and tithing 20% of his weekly paycheck to the group. There's no way he is going to back down now, after investing so much. Barry was so far into the trance induction that he actually put up a whole web site dedicated to the teachings of Fred Lenz and invited us to view it - now he doesn't want to talk about it. Go figure. The funny thing about Barry is that he threw both of his teachers under the bus, just to get back at Judy. Now he is a science writer who doesn't even believe in the Big Bang. Barry seems to be so mixed up these days that I don't know how he even makes it to the local bar to get on the free Wi-Fi.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote : How do we explain Barry's conviction that he witnessed Lenz rise up from the ground? Premise 1: The laws of physics imply that levitation events as claimed by Barry are improbable-verging-on-the- impossible. Premise 2: Barry is not communicating with us from the padded cell of an institute for the incurably insane. Premise 3: One in five people are suitable subjects for deep-hypnosis experiences. Premise 4: Frederick Lenz was a hypnotist. (This seems likely in view of the testimony of ex-followers who do claim that Lenz could use mass hypnosis.) It's commonplace in hypnosis work to induce negative and positive visual hallucinations - I've seen Derren Brown convince someone that he (Derren) was invisible and that objects moving around in front of him were levitating - though we observers could see Derren himself simply lifting up and putting down the items. I can't see why a hypnotist couldn't persuade people that he was floating mid-air. That may not even be necessary: if Lenz was simply to give someone a post-hypnotic suggestion that they'd have the memory of having seen the master float - then induce amnesia of what was said during the hypnotic trance itself - the subject would faithfully recall the miraculous event. As 20 per cent of people are natural somnambulists, maybe Lenz selected from that group to be in his inner circle. Barry may not be naturally somnambulistic but as he's been into lots of weird shit he's probably trained himself to enter altered states. So I wonder if Barry recalls ever being formally hypnotised by Lenz? Maybe someone has another explanation? All I know is bawee picked the wrong person to cross. You are so far out of his league that it's almost criminal. Be gentle on him Seraphita, I know he ain't seen nothin' yet.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the somnambulist
Richard, Yes, he is desperate for attention to point of lying about what others say or didn't say. He's been doing this for years so that he can push other people's buttons. It's his way of convincing himself that he owns this forum. It's also his idea of entertainment. Before, Judy was the butt of his manipulations. Now, he's testing out who can be his next victim. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 11/20/2014 5:05 PM, jr_esq wrote: I think Barry is hallucinating most of the time. That's why he's quoting some words which he thinks came from me. Maybe he is so desperate for attention that he felt he needed to make up stuff, to make himself look superior to everyone else. To tell you the truth, I have no idea where he got that crap from. Maybe he felt that his writing just didn't stand on it's own, so he thought he would embellish his spiritual status. Similarly, he's more likely telling us the same thing about Lenz. He does seem to take a certain pride in his past spiritual endeavors. IOW he saw things that never occurred. The problem is his cognitive dissonance. You know he probably once believed in Rama or he wouldn't have spent all that time following Lenz around and paying his hotel and airfare - and tithing 20% of his weekly paycheck to the group. There's no way he is going to back down now, after investing so much. Barry was so far into the trance induction that he actually put up a whole web site dedicated to the teachings of Fred Lenz and invited us to view it - now he doesn't want to talk about it. Go figure. The funny thing about Barry is that he threw both of his teachers under the bus, just to get back at Judy. Now he is a science writer who doesn't even believe in the Big Bang. Barry seems to be so mixed up these days that I don't know how he even makes it to the local bar to get on the free Wi-Fi.
[FairfieldLife] Yes, Barry, there is no need to believe in God
Belief is a thought, that moves us through the gap, from one experience of a subject, to another. For example, we believe the earth is round. This belief remains in place, and helps our world make sense, though there are few times, when we actually observe the curvature of our planet. So it is, with a strong belief in God. Often it becomes the belief in God, that is pursued, instead of a close, immediate, ongoing relationship with Him and Her. I cannot honestly say that I believe in God, yet He and She make their presence known to me, moment to moment, and the relationship is always vital and alive. I did not think up God on my own, just as I would not know how to write, or speak, or drive a car, or try to treat people well. It was taught, this idea of God - many different aspects, over a lifetime. Running the spectrum, from static definitions, with no direct contact; a remote, authoritarian God, to a universe brimming with God, in all of Her and His creativity, endless expansion, and love. A creation that brings so many aspects, so many dynamics, of God to light, that it makes belief in God, irrelevant. Like believing in air and sunlight. So, Barry, I too, do not believe in God, but only one of us is richer for it.:-)
[FairfieldLife] For Barry, was MIU Promo Video 1981
Just speaking for myself, I always found Dr. Pete to have one foot in the door and one foot outside, although I do like him. He couldn't seem to make up his mind about the nature of pure consciousness. He also failed to express himself very well at times. Sort of like Barry does most of the time. Pete didn't seem to be very knowledgeable about the various states of consciousness and the mechanics of consciousness. It was difficult to pin him down on anything and work out the contradictions. We had several conversations and he would almost always seem to fall back on the /ad hominems/. Judy called him on this on one occasion. Readers should realize that Dr. Pete is an educator, not an M.D., and he has no business prescribing medicine on a public forum, to anyone, especially when posting to social media, /before the class at school is even dismissed!/ On 9/4/2014 7:30 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Dr. Pete, who commented on this video on Facebook today (where I saw it, because he's a FB Friend of mine), seems to agree more with my characterization of these people as brainwashed than he agrees with yours. Sure, they were young, idealistic, and inspired. They were *also* brainwashed, repeating the exact phrases they'd been taught to repeat verbatim, all without having ever seen -- or even *asked for* -- any evidence that they were true. I'm gonna stick with brainwashed and cultists. An ad hominem is the second to last resort of someone who is losing a debate and is unable to respond with legitimacy. The last resort, most difficult for the ego, is to consider that he might be wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem One of the reasons I like Dr. Pete is that he has no problem describing his own time with TM the same way and admitting that he was part of a cult. But then he's a shrink...in retrospect probably the only way he *can* justify having been so stupid as to believe the things we believed back then is to point out the systematic, decades-long indoctrination that led to us believing them. Since what he wrote is in public view on FB, I guess I can pass along one of his other comments that I found perceptive: I helped produce several videos for various MIU functions in the 1980's and it was always a problem to get people to talk about their experiences in their own words rather than in TM jargon. It was the worst with people 'higher-up' in the movement. I interviewed one person, who is in this video too, who kept on saying that he experienced the 'home of all the laws of nature' when he meditated. I asked him, off-camera, if he actually had this experience or if this was a concept he had from MMY. He couldn't distinguish between the two which was rather shocking. Another former FFLer who is actually seen in the video describes it in the comments thusly: How embarrassing. Now I see why TM lost its popularity and the university changed its name. *From:* feste37 no_re...@yahoogroups.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Thursday, September 4, 2014 1:43 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: MIU Promo Video 1981 No, not brainwashed. Young, idealistic, enthusiastic, inspired. I was there in 1981, and it was a good place to be. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : The shock is not how incredibly brainwashed these people are as they parrot buzzphrases and display absolutely no individuality whatsoever. The shock is that 34 years later people still think like this and talk like this, some of them here on this very forum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bteLrKEfj3gfeature=share
[FairfieldLife] For Barry
Love - Hey Joe http://youtu.be/40DVJUeBCMM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry thank you for your Leonard Cohen recommendation
Dear All,I highly recommend the current issue (September/ October 2014) of Foreign Affairs. It's not at all about foreign affairs. I Love Foreign Affairs. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
If you're happy, I'm happy.:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
No, no, Fleetwood, I'm happy if you're happy (-: HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Official [HQ] HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Officia... View on www.youtube.com Preview by Yahoo On Sunday, June 8, 2014 11:39 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: If you're happy, I'm happy.:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Share, I am LOL right now! Want to laugh with me? When I posted this very song to you; you replied with a comment that...Jazz was not one of the genres you appreciate. Then, when I tied it to your favorite movie and the minions, you told me you didn't recall hearing it during the movie. Now, sweetie, you are posting it yourself! You must have got over your aversion to Jazz and the memory blank you were suffering. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : No, no, Fleetwood, I'm happy if you're happy (-: HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Official [HQ] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Officia... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg; class=ygrps-yiv-1673207486link-enhancr-card-url ygrps-yiv-1673207486link-enhancr-element Preview by Yahoo On Sunday, June 8, 2014 11:39 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: If you're happy, I'm happy.:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Emily, imho, LOLing is a good thing! I'm laughing too...at my changeable self, unfathomable, mysterious, etc. Maybe lines on water, lines on air. I was even clapping along! Go figure! On Sun, 6/8/14, emilymae...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth') To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, June 8, 2014, 12:10 PM Share, I am LOL right now! Want to laugh with me? When I posted this very song to you; you replied with a comment that...Jazz was not one of the genres you appreciate. Then, when I tied it to your favorite movie and the minions, you told me you didn't recall hearing it during the movie. Now, sweetie, you are posting it yourself! You must have got over your aversion to Jazz and the memory blank you were suffering. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : No, no, Fleetwood, I'm happy if you're happy (-:HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Official [HQ] HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Officia...View on www.youtube.comPreview by Yahoo On Sunday, June 8, 2014 11:39 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: If you're happy, I'm happy.:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Good girl. Now, are you in too much fear to answer the question I asked you? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, imho, LOLing is a good thing! I'm laughing too...at my changeable self, unfathomable, mysterious, etc. Maybe lines on water, lines on air. I was even clapping along! Go figure! On Sun, 6/8/14, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth') To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, June 8, 2014, 12:10 PM Share, I am LOL right now! Want to laugh with me? When I posted this very song to you; you replied with a comment that...Jazz was not one of the genres you appreciate. Then, when I tied it to your favorite movie and the minions, you told me you didn't recall hearing it during the movie. Now, sweetie, you are posting it yourself! You must have got over your aversion to Jazz and the memory blank you were suffering. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : No, no, Fleetwood, I'm happy if you're happy (-:HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Official [HQ] HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Officia...View on www.youtube.comPreview by Yahoo On Sunday, June 8, 2014 11:39 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: If you're happy, I'm happy.:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
I doubt it. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : No, no, Fleetwood, I'm happy if you're happy (-: HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Official [HQ] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg HAPPY - Pharrell Williams (feat. Minions) | 2014 Officia... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOWDb2TBYDg; class=ygrps-yiv-1297010212link-enhancr-card-url ygrps-yiv-1297010212link-enhancr-element Preview by Yahoo On Sunday, June 8, 2014 11:39 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: If you're happy, I'm happy.:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Nope, Fleetwood, I didn't think it was lame. I just figured it was something I hadn't run across before, given that I don't get out much, live in the midwest, etc. (-: On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:52 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know...lame, right? I was trying for anything flattering, as a way of paying myself a compliment, through you, based on your comment that you take Barry's comments, as a reflection of him, vs. you. And as we all know, once you have to explain a joke, no matter how clever it may have been, it now automatically kinda sucks, so...:-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Fleetwood, I have no idea what this *bank account* comment means... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:51 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Plus (???), Tom Cruise starred in both. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Judy, I said plus because I was adding the point that Nicholson was not in Top Gun. You had made the point that the quote was uttered in A Few Good Men. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:31 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Plus (???), Tom Cruise starred in both. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Yes, Share, believe it or not, I had figured that out. I was asking why you perceived it to be a plus. What did it add? At least knowing Cruise starred in both films explained why fleetwood got the two films mixed up. But I didn't mention that initially because it had nothing to do with his point. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, I said plus because I was adding the point that Nicholson was not in Top Gun. You had made the point that the quote was uttered in A Few Good Men. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 10:31 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Plus (???), Tom Cruise starred in both. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
I was gonna say, that was a very loud and extremely unpleasant little moment in time. It's no wonder there are echoes. As to giving up on Share's dignity, the question is whether doing so comes naturally to her, or whether she Boosts Barry in an attempt to lend herself a certain je ne sais quoi. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. Nor me. Don't fuck with me pretty much sums it up in my world. There have been times when I needed to be brought up short, to get my ass kicked but if it is unwarranted or delivered by someone who hardly has the right or wisdom to set me straight then I will resist. It appears Share just wants it to go away, to forget about it. I am not sure what is to be gained by doing so but neither am I sure what would benefit her to stand up and shove the negativity back at him. Only she can really know what she is capable of or how leaving it be makes her feel. But you're a fighter, Mac, and I think you have enough going for you that it is worth the fight. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. That's cool. I can agree with that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
Yep - that is something that seems to blind some people to barry's cynical and sadistic personality - that he lives in Europe. Gives him a certain superficial flair, like cheap soap. Sure wore off quickly, for me. PS wait for it - I've been posting a lot about Barry today, and fully expect him to trot out his, if that's enlightenment, they can keep it, routine, the next time he is on here - I hope he enjoys me, as much as I enjoy him! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : I was gonna say, that was a very loud and extremely unpleasant little moment in time. It's no wonder there are echoes. As to giving up on Share's dignity, the question is whether doing so comes naturally to her, or whether she Boosts Barry in an attempt to lend herself a certain je ne sais quoi. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
OMG! - You have the biggest, um, *bank account*, I've ever seen! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, Ann and Fleetwood, it's not complicated. Whatever turq says to and or about me, I take it as a reflection of him rather than of me. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:59 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now that we both remember Barry, I, personally, refer to such echoes, as, disturbing memories, but it is pretty clear that being treated like that, does not bother you. Nonetheless, I still find it tough to give up, completely, on your dignity, Share. Keep convincing me, though, if you must, but it doesn't come naturally for me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So many echoes of one little moment in time... On Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:47 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The guy who told you to shut the fuck up, remember, Share?? and you kinda liked it?? THAT Barry. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Who's Barry? (-: On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:43 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: oh c'mon, you Big Barry Booster, you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Plus, Jack Nicholson was not in Top Gun. On Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:41 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Yes, thanks - point still stands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : A Few Good Men, not Top Gun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You remember the phrase from Top Gun, from Jack Nicholson, kiddo? You can't handle the truth. Very appropriate for you. See, Barry, a person who avoids the truth, as you do, relative or absolute, thinks he has a free pass with life, that consequences just don't apply to him. But it is a fantasy, as is this essay of yours. Your are like a timid child, who after being frightened, makes sweeping judgments on a host of subjects, to avoid being frightened again. I am all for challenging dogma, its just that I continue to find truth beyond it, whereas you are satisfied to pronounce it so, and close your mind to other possibilities. Also, If you were more open-minded, you would be a much, much better writer, than you are. Being as predictable as you are, your stuff is like a B Movie, where the conclusion is accurately predicted, two minutes into watching.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry can't handle the truth (was Re: Why I am not fond of the word 'truth')
On 6/7/2014 7:28 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: As to giving up on Share's dignity, the question is whether doing so comes naturally to /her/, or whether she Boosts Barry in an attempt to lend herself a certain je ne sais quoi. So, it's all about Share. Go figure.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry and Curtis commenting on enlightenment, without a clue
You keep trying to distract me, and make this about me. It isn't, Curtis. It is about you and Barry prattling on about 'enlightenment'. Something neither of you knows anything about. You can keep up your dodging and weaving, but it ain't gonna get either of you to Cosmic Consciousness, or beyond. You can point your finger at me all you want, but it doesn't make your lack of spiritual experience suddenly vanish, or suddenly give you credibility. You and Barry are throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and happy to do it. A couple of ignorant ex-teachers, who cannot walk their talk. So, Curtis, you continue to feel smug about you ability to hold forth on something you and Barry know nothing about, except for his TWO WEEKS OF WITNESSING LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD, and I'll continue to call it as it is. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : As Rick Archer's quote said earlier, the only one wasting his time, is the one running around, shitting on others' spiritual paths. There are basically two approaches to enlightenment - either you go for it, or you don't. C: But you never did go for it Jim. You are a couch quarterback for the Maharishi team. J: However, Barry and Curtis, have discovered a third way - You attempt enlightenment, spiritual liberation, for a few years, begin to doubt your progress, and the whole mechanism, drop out, and spend the rest of your life, as an angry outsider, looking in. C: So you are thinking that spiritual life is some kind of contest that you can win and then lord over others? I am unfamiliar with this spiritual path Jim. I think you are confused here. I didn't doubt my progress I grew into a world view that did not recognize Maharishi's world view and perspective on my inner experience as authoritative. The anger routine you and Nabbie run is all projection. I am sharing my views on a subject that I am interested in here just as you do. J: This doesn't prevent either fool from spouting on at length about spiritual subjects, waaay out of their depth. C: I don't believe you and I would come to a consensus opinion about what the term spiritual refers to, so your opinion about my views is irrelevant to me. IF you are trying to self promote yourself as an expert in these matters, that will not happen for me. J: Barry will comment on Maharishi and his enlightenment, without giving it a second thought - yes, like a legless man, coaching a track team, Barry knows it all. J: Barry and Curtis wouldn't know a good meditation experience, if it walked up and shook their hand. C: Here you are disagreeing with Maharishi and his representatives who certified us both as experts in his meditation. Both of us were involved in years of advanced courses devoted to the development of experience with Maharishi's programs for higher states of consciousness and when both of us left we were trusted leaders in the organization. You can't rewrite history Jim. You may disagree with my opinion about Maharishi's teaching now, but as far as us ever experiencing what you are making such a fuss about, we are bot certified in it and you are a self proclaimed expert with no formal training comparatively. Not only would we both know a good meditation we were trained to evaluate claims by people like you. J: They are rank beginners, waiting anxiously to begin the process of discovering themselves. Let's not take the frightened murmurings of frightened boy as fact, or wisdom, and begin to recognize it for what it really is. C: Here you are just being a troll. Your attempt to elevate your position as expert in Maharishi's teaching is only going to fly with Nabbie who has entered in a collusion of not challenging each other ridiculous claims. I met many Sidhas like you Jim. Trying to bypass Maharishi's movement cast system in a self created power struggle with the teachers. If you are so into Maharishi's teaching why didn't you actually study it in any depth? Do you regret that? When I went to spend 4 years at Sidhaland after 4 years at MIU it was to perfect the sidhis on Maharishi's invitation. Where were you Jim? The invitation was open to everyone. Perhaps all this animosity is a projection of your own lack of commitment to Maharishi's programs. As far as I am concerned I gave him 100% when I was in. You are the dilettante in his teaching. But understanding his teaching is not your goal. You think you can use this as a form of oneupmanship personally. What's with that routine? Do you know what it reveals about you? J:This is not to say, that spiritual topics do not have many sides, and some controversy. However we would much rather hear form those with more experiences than these disgruntles neophytes. C: Nice try at a I'm really not unhinged save Jim. The tern disgruntled is a sophist trick. I left the movement
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry and Curtis commenting on enlightenment, without a clue
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You keep trying to distract me, and make this about me. It isn't, Curtis. It is about you and Barry prattling on about 'enlightenment'. Something neither of you knows anything about. You can keep up your dodging and weaving, but it ain't gonna get either of you to Cosmic Consciousness, or beyond. C: Are you incapable of going beyond your point of reference to understand that it is not shared? J: You can point your finger at me all you want, but it doesn't make your lack of spiritual experience C: You have used this word as a cudgel long enough. Lets hear you define it in a comprehensible way that distinguishes it from what the Moonies claim about their magical inner states. And do tell how you know anything about my inner experience. J: suddenly vanish, or suddenly give you credibility. C: Here you misunderstand my intentions. You and I will never have credibility with each other. You are beating a dead horse here. I don''t seek or need anything from you nor you from me. J: You and Barry are throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and happy to do it. A couple of ignorant ex-teachers, who cannot walk their talk. C: I am living consistent with my values. your outside judgements are just dickish trolling. J:So, Curtis, you continue to feel smug about you ability to hold forth on something you and Barry know nothing about, except for his TWO WEEKS OF WITNESSING LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD, and I'll continue to call it as it is. C: You have already won the smug trophy Jim. I wasn't even a contender. But yes I will post my opinions about subjects that interest me here and it will often make your self serving prattle look kind of dumb. That can't be helped. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : As Rick Archer's quote said earlier, the only one wasting his time, is the one running around, shitting on others' spiritual paths. There are basically two approaches to enlightenment - either you go for it, or you don't. C: But you never did go for it Jim. You are a couch quarterback for the Maharishi team. J: However, Barry and Curtis, have discovered a third way - You attempt enlightenment, spiritual liberation, for a few years, begin to doubt your progress, and the whole mechanism, drop out, and spend the rest of your life, as an angry outsider, looking in. C: So you are thinking that spiritual life is some kind of contest that you can win and then lord over others? I am unfamiliar with this spiritual path Jim. I think you are confused here. I didn't doubt my progress I grew into a world view that did not recognize Maharishi's world view and perspective on my inner experience as authoritative. The anger routine you and Nabbie run is all projection. I am sharing my views on a subject that I am interested in here just as you do. J: This doesn't prevent either fool from spouting on at length about spiritual subjects, waaay out of their depth. C: I don't believe you and I would come to a consensus opinion about what the term spiritual refers to, so your opinion about my views is irrelevant to me. IF you are trying to self promote yourself as an expert in these matters, that will not happen for me. J: Barry will comment on Maharishi and his enlightenment, without giving it a second thought - yes, like a legless man, coaching a track team, Barry knows it all. J: Barry and Curtis wouldn't know a good meditation experience, if it walked up and shook their hand. C: Here you are disagreeing with Maharishi and his representatives who certified us both as experts in his meditation. Both of us were involved in years of advanced courses devoted to the development of experience with Maharishi's programs for higher states of consciousness and when both of us left we were trusted leaders in the organization. You can't rewrite history Jim. You may disagree with my opinion about Maharishi's teaching now, but as far as us ever experiencing what you are making such a fuss about, we are bot certified in it and you are a self proclaimed expert with no formal training comparatively. Not only would we both know a good meditation we were trained to evaluate claims by people like you. J: They are rank beginners, waiting anxiously to begin the process of discovering themselves. Let's not take the frightened murmurings of frightened boy as fact, or wisdom, and begin to recognize it for what it really is. C: Here you are just being a troll. Your attempt to elevate your position as expert in Maharishi's teaching is only going to fly with Nabbie who has entered in a collusion of not challenging each other ridiculous claims. I met many Sidhas like you Jim. Trying to bypass Maharishi's movement cast system in a self created power struggle with the teachers. If you are so
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry and Curtis commenting on enlightenment, without a clue
It is really funny, Curtis, Barry endlessly making BIG about his LIFETIME TWO WEEKS of witnessing, and your alluding to your own 'advanced experiences'. That is my context - I don't make this shit up, you did. So, if you feel my mention of your lack of spiritual experience (e.g. witnessing) as a cudgel, I'll continue to wield it as such. I think of it as a balloon animal, myself. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : You keep trying to distract me, and make this about me. It isn't, Curtis. It is about you and Barry prattling on about 'enlightenment'. Something neither of you knows anything about. You can keep up your dodging and weaving, but it ain't gonna get either of you to Cosmic Consciousness, or beyond. C: Are you incapable of going beyond your point of reference to understand that it is not shared? J: You can point your finger at me all you want, but it doesn't make your lack of spiritual experience C: You have used this word as a cudgel long enough. Lets hear you define it in a comprehensible way that distinguishes it from what the Moonies claim about their magical inner states. And do tell how you know anything about my inner experience. J: suddenly vanish, or suddenly give you credibility. C: Here you misunderstand my intentions. You and I will never have credibility with each other. You are beating a dead horse here. I don''t seek or need anything from you nor you from me. J: You and Barry are throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and happy to do it. A couple of ignorant ex-teachers, who cannot walk their talk. C: I am living consistent with my values. your outside judgements are just dickish trolling. J:So, Curtis, you continue to feel smug about you ability to hold forth on something you and Barry know nothing about, except for his TWO WEEKS OF WITNESSING LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD, and I'll continue to call it as it is. C: You have already won the smug trophy Jim. I wasn't even a contender. But yes I will post my opinions about subjects that interest me here and it will often make your self serving prattle look kind of dumb. That can't be helped. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : As Rick Archer's quote said earlier, the only one wasting his time, is the one running around, shitting on others' spiritual paths. There are basically two approaches to enlightenment - either you go for it, or you don't. C: But you never did go for it Jim. You are a couch quarterback for the Maharishi team. J: However, Barry and Curtis, have discovered a third way - You attempt enlightenment, spiritual liberation, for a few years, begin to doubt your progress, and the whole mechanism, drop out, and spend the rest of your life, as an angry outsider, looking in. C: So you are thinking that spiritual life is some kind of contest that you can win and then lord over others? I am unfamiliar with this spiritual path Jim. I think you are confused here. I didn't doubt my progress I grew into a world view that did not recognize Maharishi's world view and perspective on my inner experience as authoritative. The anger routine you and Nabbie run is all projection. I am sharing my views on a subject that I am interested in here just as you do. J: This doesn't prevent either fool from spouting on at length about spiritual subjects, waaay out of their depth. C: I don't believe you and I would come to a consensus opinion about what the term spiritual refers to, so your opinion about my views is irrelevant to me. IF you are trying to self promote yourself as an expert in these matters, that will not happen for me. J: Barry will comment on Maharishi and his enlightenment, without giving it a second thought - yes, like a legless man, coaching a track team, Barry knows it all. J: Barry and Curtis wouldn't know a good meditation experience, if it walked up and shook their hand. C: Here you are disagreeing with Maharishi and his representatives who certified us both as experts in his meditation. Both of us were involved in years of advanced courses devoted to the development of experience with Maharishi's programs for higher states of consciousness and when both of us left we were trusted leaders in the organization. You can't rewrite history Jim. You may disagree with my opinion about Maharishi's teaching now, but as far as us ever experiencing what you are making such a fuss about, we are bot certified in it and you are a self proclaimed expert with no formal training comparatively. Not only would we both know a good meditation we were trained to evaluate claims by people like you. J: They are rank beginners, waiting anxiously to begin the process of discovering themselves. Let's not take the frightened murmurings
[FairfieldLife] Dave Barry
Let's say a guy named Fred is attracted to a woman named Martha. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Martha, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: Do you realize that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months? And then, there is silence in the car. To Martha, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of. And Fred is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Martha is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily towards, I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person? And Fred is thinking: ...so that means it was...let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...lemme check the odometer...Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here. And Martha is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed - even before I sensed it - that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected. And Fred is thinking: And I'm gonna have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees out, and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600. And Martha is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry, too. I feel so guilty, putting him through this, but I can't help the way I feel. I'm just not sure. And Fred is thinking: They'll probably say it's only a 90-day warranty...scumballs. And Martha is thinking: Maybe I'm just too idealistic, waiting for a knight to come riding up on his white horse, when I'm sitting right next to a perfectly good person, a person I enjoy being with, a person I truly do care about, a person who seems to truly care about me. A person who is in pain because of my self-centered, schoolgirl romantic fantasy. And Fred is thinking: Warranty? They want a warranty? I'll give them a warranty. I'll take their warranty and stick it right up their... Fred, Martha says aloud. What? says Fred, startled. Please don't torture yourself like this, she says, her eyes beginning to brim with tears. Maybe I should never have...oh dear, I feel so...(She breaks down, sobbing.) What? says Fred. I'm such a fool, Martha sobs. I mean, I know there's no knight. I really know that. It's silly. There's no knight, and there's no horse. There's no horse? says Fred. You think I'm a fool, don't you? Martha says. No! says Fred, glad to finally know the correct answer. It's just that...it's that I...I need some time, Martha says. (There is a 15-second pause while Fred, thinking as fast as he can, tries to come up with a safe response. Finally he comes up with one that he thinks might work.) Yes, he says. (Martha, deeply moved, touches his hand.) Oh, Fred, do you really feel that way? she says. What way? says Fred. That way about time, says Martha. Oh, says Fred. Yes. (Martha turns to face him and gazes deeply into his eyes, causing him to become very nervous about what she might say next, especially if it involves a horse. At last she speaks.) Thank you, Fred, she says. Thank you, says Fred. Then he takes her home, and she lies on her bed, a conflicted, tortured soul, and weeps until dawn, whereas when Fred gets back to his place, he opens a bag of Doritos, turns on the TV, and immediately becomes deeply involved in a rerun of a college basketball game between two South Dakota junior colleges that he has never heard of. A tiny voice in the far recesses of his mind tells him that something major was going on back there in the car, but he is pretty sure there is no way he would ever understand what, and so he figures it's better if he doesn't think about it. The next day Martha will call her closest friend, or perhaps two of them, and they will talk
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with
heartbeats What do ya wanna to do? Wanna be hackers? Cold crackers? Slackers?
Wastin' time with all the chat-room yakkers; nine to five chillin' at Hewlet
Packard. Wanna run with my crew, huh? Through cyber space and crunch numbers
like I do. They call me the king of the spreadsheets; got 'em all printed out
on my bedsheets.
My new computer's got the clocks; it rocks. But it was obsolete before I
opened the box. You say you've had your desktop for over a week? Throw that
junk away, man, it's an antique. Your laptop is a month old? Well, that's
great, if you can use a nice, heavy, paper-weight. My digital media is write
protected, every volumn inspected, no viruses detected. I beta-tested every
operatin' system, gave ops to some, on others I dised 'em.
While your computers crashin', mine's multi-taskin'. Got a flat screen
monitor, forty inches wide; I believe your's says etch-a-sketch on the side. In
a 32-bit world, you're a two bit user; you've got your own newsgroup - all
total losers. You're motherboard melts, when you try to send a fax; where'd you
get that CPU? In a box of Cracker Jacks?
What do ya wanna to do? Wanna be hackers? Cold crackers? Slackers? Wastin'
time with all the chat-room yakkers; nine to five chillin' at Hewlet Packard.
What?
'Its All About the Pentiums'
by Weird Al Yankovich
From the CD 'Running With Scissors'
http://youtu.be/qpMvS1Q1sos http://youtu.be/qpMvS1Q1sos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuKwpkUNNrA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuKwpkUNNrA
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
On 12/28/2013 12:18 PM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuKwpkUNNrA I already told you, Bob, I'm not gay.
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/28/2013 12:18 PM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuKwpkUNNrA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuKwpkUNNrA
I already told you, Bob, I'm not gay.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9cTQ1ZRdbw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9cTQ1ZRdbw
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
On 12/26/2013 10:45 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: His posts aren't for you Ricky, they're for those who can and do appreciate them. You just stick with the photos of shacks and keep preening and strutting for Sharon, okay? So, it's a message all about Richard, but Richard isn't supposed to read it? You're not making any sense Ann, as usual. It's considered bad form to put a respondents name in the subject line of a message. If it's a personal message, it would be better to send it by private email. If it's meant for the group, it needs to be relevant to the discussion. Bob's message seems to have got your attention though, but your reply is nonsense, so it looks like not only did Bob waste a lot of his time composing this message for you to read, but he's managed to waste your time as well. The least you could do for Bob is post an intelligent reply or comment. P.S. Have you ever heard of snipping posts, Ann?
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 10:45 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
His posts aren't for you Ricky, they're for those who can and do appreciate
them. You just stick with the photos of shacks and keep preening and strutting
for Sharon, okay?
So, it's a message all about Richard, but Richard isn't supposed to read it?
You're not making any sense Ann, as usual. It's considered bad form to put a
respondents name in the subject line of a message. If it's a personal message,
it would be better to send it by private email. If it's meant for the group, it
needs to be relevant to the discussion. Bob's message seems to have got your
attention though, but your reply is nonsense, so it looks like not only did Bob
waste a lot of his time composing this message for you to read, but he's
managed to waste your time as well. The least you could do for Bob is post an
intelligent reply or comment.
P.S. Have you ever heard of snipping posts, Ann?
No, never. Why don't you tell me all about it? Do I use scissors or nail
cutters? Do I say I snipped or simply snip and hope people figure out what I
snipped. Furthermore, could you perhaps provide an example of perfect snipping
(with plenty of white spaces in between so I can understand)? Thanking you in
advance...
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
On 12/27/2013 8:43 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: P.S. Have you ever heard of snipping posts, Ann? No, never. Why don't you tell me all about it? Do I use scissors or nail cutters? Do I say I snipped or simply snip and hope people figure out what I snipped. You are supposed to read the Group Guidelines BEFORE you start posting Ann. So, maybe it's time to review a few of the guidelines for posting to FFL. The Guidelines can be found in the FLL Files section: FairfieldLife Guidelines: 3) Please snip - be highly selective in quoting a message to which you are responding, deleting all but the most relevant portions of the prior posts. This makes the daily digest easier to read for those who subscribe to it. Furthermore, could you perhaps provide an example of perfect snipping (with plenty of white spaces in between so I can understand)? Thanking you in advance... D'oh! I snipped Bob's un-formatted message in my reply to you, Ann, but in your zeal to discredit me, you failed to notice. Something tells me you didn't even read Bob's message, which is kind of an insult to Bob, since he obviously spent a long time composing it. I haven't read Bob's message yet because I'm being kept busy instructing you in netiquette, but when I find my magnifying glass, I will get back to Bob - you can count on it. It's not often that I get my very own thread to talk about myself. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
You've wasted another post on me, Bob - I hardly ever click on a YouTube link
if the poster can't spend the time posting a comment to go with it. What
exactly, are you trying to say? I'm sure it is interesting coming from you, but
I have bad eyes these days.
Try more gum!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5TQ4GF8rNI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5TQ4GF8rNI
On 12/26/2013 12:48 PM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... mailto:punditster@...
wrote:
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons
at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat
for easier reading. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor;
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing;
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers,
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF;
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap -
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes,
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and
keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
You've wasted another post on me, Bob - I hardly ever click on a YouTube link
if the poster can't spend the time posting a comment to go with it. What
exactly, are you trying to say? I'm sure it is interesting coming from you, but
I have bad eyes these days.
His posts aren't for you Ricky, they're for those who can and do appreciate
them. You just stick with the photos of shacks and keep preening and strutting
for Sharon, okay?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikMKJwbMQ_M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikMKJwbMQ_M
On 12/26/2013 12:48 PM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... mailto:punditster@...
wrote:
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons
at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat
for easier reading. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor;
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing;
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers,
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF;
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap -
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes,
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and
keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 10:45 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
His posts aren't for you Ricky, they're for those who can and do appreciate
them. You just stick with the photos of shacks and keep preening and strutting
for Sharon, okay?
So, it's a message all about Richard, When Barry met Richard
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor;
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing;
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers,
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF;
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap -
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes,
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and
keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
More from Richard:
but Richard isn't supposed to read it? You're not making any sense Ann, as
usual. It's considered bad form to put a respondents name in the subject
line of a message. If it's a personal message, it would be better to send
it by private email. If it's meant for the group, it needs to be relevant
to the discussion. Bob's message seems to have got your attention though,
but your reply is nonsense, so it looks like not only did Bob waste a lot
of his time composing this message for you to read, but he's managed to
waste your time as well. The least you could do for Bob is post an
intelligent reply or comment.
P.S. Have you ever heard of snipping posts, Ann?
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/27/2013 8:43 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
P.S. Have you ever heard of snipping posts, Ann?
No, never. Why don't you tell me all about it? Do I use scissors or nail
cutters? Do I say I snipped or simply snip and hope people figure out what I
snipped. You are supposed to read the Group Guidelines BEFORE you start posting
Ann. So, maybe it's time to review a few of the guidelines for posting to FFL.
The Guidelines can be found in the FLL Files section:
FairfieldLife Guidelines:
3) Please snip - be highly selective in quoting a message to which you are
responding, deleting all but the most relevant portions of the prior posts.
This makes the daily digest easier to read for those who subscribe to it.
Furthermore, could you perhaps provide an example of perfect snipping (with
plenty of white spaces in between so I can understand)? Thanking you in
advance... D'oh! I snipped Bob's un-formatted message in my reply to you, Ann,
When Barry met Richard
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor;
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing;
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers,
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF;
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap -
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes,
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and
keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
More cowbell from Richard: ...but in your zeal to discredit me, you failed to
notice. Something tells me you didn't even read Bob's message, which is kind of
an insult to Bob, since he obviously spent a long time composing it. I haven't
read Bob's message yet
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote: they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats What do ya wanna to do? Wanna be hackers? Cold crackers? Slackers? Wastin' time with all the chat-room yakkers; nine to five chillin' at Hewlet Packard. Wanna run with my crew, huh? Through cyber space and crunch numbers like I do. They call me the king of the spreadsheets; got 'em all printed out on my bedsheets. My new computer's got the clocks; it rocks. But it was obsolete before I opened the box. You say you've had your desktop for over a week? Throw that junk away, man, it's an antique. Your laptop is a month old? Well, that's great, if you can use a nice, heavy, paper-weight. My digital media is write protected, every volumn inspected, no viruses detected. I beta-tested every operatin' system, gave ops to some, on others I dised 'em. While your computers crashin', mine's multi-taskin'. Got a flat screen monitor, forty inches wide; I believe your's says etch-a-sketch on the side. In a 32-bit world, you're a two bit user; you've got your own newsgroup - all total losers. You're motherboard melts, when you try to send a fax; where'd you get that CPU? In a box of Cracker Jacks? What do ya wanna to do? Wanna be hackers? Cold crackers? Slackers? Wastin' time with all the chat-room yakkers; nine to five chillin' at Hewlet Packard. What? 'Its All About the Pentiums' by Weird Al Yankovich From the CD 'Running With Scissors' http://youtu.be/qpMvS1Q1sos
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
On 12/27/2013 11:25 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote: When Barry met Richard I've never met Barry, Bob. He's over near Paris, France; I'm over here out by Paris, Texas.
[FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few - tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping supper warm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat for easier reading. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote: Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; *let's review what we know* about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few - tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping supper warm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons
at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat
for easier reading. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor;
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing;
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers,
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF;
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap -
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes,
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and
keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
You've wasted another post on me, Bob - I hardly ever click on a YouTube
link if the poster can't spend the time posting a comment to go with it.
What exactly, are you trying to say? I'm sure it is interesting coming
from you, but I have bad eyes these days.
On 12/26/2013 12:48 PM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a
break between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few
computer lessons at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I
don't have time to reformat for easier reading. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita;
*let's review what we know* about Barry and Richard, and what they
have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each
other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both
believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with
heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second,
they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding
from Richard some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do
that sort of thing; third, both appear to have a keen desire to be
taken seriously as writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to
believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced
libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be beyond child bearing
years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they
both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military
brats from Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share
is planning to rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and
Richard's wind-up toy (don't call her a blow up doll, she obviously
has no microprocessor); sixth, they're both obsessed with Judy and
appear hooked on the regular humiliation she subjects them to - as if
playing so far out of above their pay grade compensates for the
exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be confused
with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh,
they both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral
observer might wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they
missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims
he recently read everything Robin ever wrote; I just hope Barry
doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few - tell Richard
about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a bonfire);
eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both
appear lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in
a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how
could anyone doubt that nuptials for these two are meant to be, and
just around the corner; I think in their declining years these two
have what it takes to make a union that will inspire the poets: of
course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for example, how will
Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - just as
Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt
be captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine
Richard coming off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and
refusing to say when he'll be back. We can also only pray that
Richard will get to safety when Barry starts practicing his martial
arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a particularly
devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do the
laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with
our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road,
because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR.
And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being
so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking Barry's
last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the wind-up
toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
You've wasted another post on me, Bob - I hardly ever click on a YouTube link
if the poster can't spend the time posting a comment to go with it. What
exactly, are you trying to say? I'm sure it is interesting coming from you, but
I have bad eyes these days.
His posts aren't for you Ricky, they're for those who can and do appreciate
them. You just stick with the photos of shacks and keep preening and strutting
for Sharon, okay?
On 12/26/2013 12:48 PM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... mailto:punditster@...
wrote:
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons
at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat
for easier reading. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor;
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model -
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing;
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers,
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF;
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap -
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes,
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and
keeping supper warm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
Go figure!
[FairfieldLife] Baby Barry Day; Need me some Bob Price and Ravi#39;s and etc.
Calling out to the winds to maneuver the butterfly effect or is that affect? Calling the carbon forms to bind with this synergy. Calling out the female flows. Calling out the embers of mist. Calling out the dirty Santa of earthy genes. Where have the there from been, been? Spank the Barry and ride a cock horse to see a fine lady in dragon tattoo force How old is Barry today?
[FairfieldLife] Poor Barry Wright (was: The Implosion of a Mean Girls Club)
This is all trolling, stuff Barry made up. If anyone here takes Barry seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. (Hey, BUCK, how's Barry's post for unkindness?) Barry, how do you deal with the extreme embarrassment of being unable to make a case against your enemies without being grossly dishonest? I've never had any trouble making an honest case against you, nor has Emily or Ann. BTW, you'd save yourself at least some embarrassment if you actually read your enemies' posts, so you don't make unforced errors when you describe their behavior. Gonna rub your nose in another one of your messes from a few days ago. You wrote: Even Feste...nails her in a lie about punctuation on blogs... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/365202 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/365202 OOpsie. That was a really dumb one, Barry. Barry upchucked: Does anyone remember what it was like here on Fairfield Life just a few months ago? Judy Stein had managed to recruit a number of people -- not just Ann and Emily, who as anyone with an ounce of perception knows, don't have anything to talk about here on FFL *except* what Judy wants them to talk about, but also a few guys, like Ravi and Jimbo and Bob Price and (rarely) Raunchydog -- to constantly join her in ragging on her (Judy's) declared enemies. It was pretty much non-stop, this group of Mean Girls renacting all the worst aspects of Jr. High School, spending most of their time, most every day ragging on and trying to get Vaj, Curtis, Sal Sunshine, myself, occasionally Steve, and anyone else who dared to cross them. But now it's just the three of them -- Judy, Ann, and Emily -- and they're mainly ganging up these days on Share, because Share is pretty much the only one who feeds their insanity by still replying to it. Richard jumped in for (as far as I can tell) the perverse FUN of it, and decided to give Judy a taste of her own medicine by stalking *her*, and the best that Judy can do is to post a canned reply: If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know... Naturally, no one has ever taken her up on this. What she doesn't seem to understand is that their failure to do this indicates not *just* a disinterest in Richard, but an even greater disinterest in *her*. No one takes *her* seriously. NO ONE CARES about her petty wars with Yet Another Victim of them. NO ONE CARES what she could pull out of her stuck-in-the-past treasure chest to discredit him and glorify herself. NO ONE CARES about her at all. They just wish she'd go away. Even most of her former minions and Mean Girls Club recruits have left her swinging in the breeze, dangling from her own obsessions. Jim has wisely moved on to writing some creative pieces, making music, and enjoying his retirement; good for him, for having a life, and for distancing himself from those who clearly don't. Raunchy's mainly silent, and notably doesn't pile on the way she used to. Bob Price came and went yet again, when nothing he could say could get a rise out of the people he wanted to get a rise out of, and when he figured out that he wasn't worth paying any attention to, either. Ravi...well, Rick finally came to his senses and kicked the sorryass psychopath back into the gutter he crawled out of. In fact, the ONLY people who still pile on to the Get Share Fests are the two women who don't seem to have the intelligence to do anything else -- Ann and Emily. The two of them -- plus Judy, of course, who has now been reduced to trotting out year-old grudges to obsess on -- are all that's left of the Mean Girls Club. And y'know what? They don't have an audience, *except for themselves*. The ONLY people who ever seem to reply to their posts (except for Share's feeble attempts to laugh them off, which only encourage them, and Feste's to wake them up, which do the same thing) are each other. NO ONE ELSE GIVES A SHIT ABOUT ANYTHING THEY SAY. Karma, dudes. Piss your life away obsessing on your enemies like Jr. High School Mean Girls, and people tend to start treating you the way you're acting. It doesn't *matter* what they say any more, or about who. The answer to the question of How am I doing in my quest to 'get' my enemies is the same one Judy receives when she repeat-posts If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know... Total silence. NO ONE CARES. She and her Mean Girls have achieved almost total irrelevance.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the rage-a-holic
Doc-the-guy-with-many-names sez: Yeah, the guy looks for excuses to get pissed off. All because of a woman who dumped him. What a life. FFL is part of Barry's emotional pornography. Even if what Jim-Doc projects onto me were true (it's not), it would be better than what he calls *his* life. First, let's not forget that back during the now- sorely-missed-posting-limits days, he was the person who went over the posting limit more than anyone else on this forum, even more than Judy (she was in second place, trailing as I remember by only one instance), and thus had to spend the most time sitting on the I-ain't-got-no-self-control bench. Now he's defend- ing others for having as little self control as he has and attacking those who point it out. No surprise there. Second, let's not forget that this is the guy who claims to be fully enlightened, and yet the *only* way he can get people on this forum to pay any attention to him (hint: what he really seeks) is to pile on to the common enemies of a bunch of mean girls and rag on the same people they hate, in hopes that they'll accept him as one of them. Now THAT is pathetic. I'm just sayin' that this issue is NOT about censor- ship vs. non. It's about a small group of people who are so lonely and so starved for attention that they spend most of their time posting to a bunch of strangers on the Internet they've never met, desperately trying to flood them with Pay attention to me...PLEASE posts. What perpetuates the terrible situation they've created here **IS** paying attention to them. Stop, and they'll dry up and blow away like the nonentities they are.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry, the rage-a-holic
Doc (really Jim Flanegin) sez: I hope *that woman* who dumped you, so long ago, is aware of what she has created, and God help you, Barry. I think this is worth commenting on, not because it's either true or because it stung me as he hoped it would, but because this is pretty much Classic Jim. He does the very thing he accuses me of, and makes things up. He *is*, after all, the guy who makes up stories about his own supposed enlightenment. I don't think there is a single person on this forum who *believes* any of these stories, especially given *his* frequent fits of rage and jealousy and lashing out, but he keeps doing it, IMO for a number of reasons. First, and worthy of some compassion, he's recently retired and ain't gettin' no attention from real people in his real life any more, so he has to troll for it here and on Batgap. There, because those people will believe *anything*, he might have a few suckers who actually believe his made-up stories about his own supposed enlightenment and how oh-so-superior that makes him to anyone who...uh...isn't him. But here, not so much. Most people just laugh at him, and avoid confronting him over his obvious lies, because he has a tendency to lash out and hold grudges when anyone does. Second, he's just not very *good* at making things up. His tales of the enlightened life ring about as true as they would if they were told by Dick Cheney. I feel for him, and for anyone desperate enough for attention to feel they *have* to make up stories about being enlightened to get any, so I've laid off of him lately. But I figured it was about time to poke him again so that he'll reveal his true colors for a few newbs who don't know who and what they're dealing with. Suffice it to say *how* he reacts to this poking will say far more about his supposed enlightenment than any of his words will. As for our relative contributions to this forum, well, I am the first to admit that I just use it as a place to write hopefully amusing stories about my real life. That life may *be* pretty boring to many people, and that's understandable because a lot of what I do involves just sitting in cafes and writing. True, the cafes may be in Paris and Amsterdam and Leiden and the south of France, but I *am* sitting there and writing, so my stories are actually true. If there is anyone here who believes that *Jim's* stories about his supposed enlightenment are true, speak up now or forever hold your peace.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Barry, the rage-a-holic
[FairfieldLife] For Barry - Uncle Tantrum Narcissus
23 signs you're a secret narcissist - yes you are Barry, STOP LYING !!! http://www.salon.com/2013/08/27/stop_telling_me_youre_a_sensitive_introv\ ert_partner/ http://www.salon.com/2013/08/27/stop_telling_me_youre_a_sensitive_intro\ vert_partner/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL
Ravi, I agree with Steve and last night had already decided to include the whole situation in my prayers. Just now I was wondering, and it's none of my business but still wonder if your ex is mainly concerned that you will turn the boys against Amma. Anyway, hope you have a good weekend. Same to everyone in the Funny Farm Lounge, Happy Independence Day! PS I have borrowed the movie Lincoln from the library and plan to watch it today, yay! From: seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:29 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL I do recommend the yellow car. Wife just got a 2013 sun yellow VW Beetle Coupe (no convertible). Couldn't wait to jettison the mini van (second one) she's been driving for the last 17 years. I hope your ex relents and gets her priorities in order. I know you are a gem of a father. Really a sin to limit contact. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Awesome Steve - I have a 4 day vacation, starting now - will be driving down to the San Francisco very shortly. Interesting story about the car, I plan to give my '09 Civic to my kid who turns 15 and half in November i.e. if my ex agrees. She's too fucking mad since I started writing against Amma and hasn't returned any emails since last August. Very interesting that her love for the cult and some religious, delusional fantasies is more important than having her kids have contact with their father - I'm still hopeful considering I could buy a new car - a yellow convertible was my plan, I'm not so sure. Why does a mad, reclusive yogi like me need a Yellow convertible - total BS that - I'm still debating, if there was a woman in the picture yeah, anyway it hasn't been decided to my satisfaction yet. Happy 4th to you and everyone else !!! On 7/3/2013 5:29 PM, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Very good Stevie - I don't want you to get too stressed out over all this. Okay Ravi, I'll try to stay cool. Of course right now *I am* chillin' . Just had some pasta carbanara from the Cheesecake Factory. Yum. No work for maybe four days, yay!, and then vacation. Actually have a lot of work (work) to do to get ready for vacation. Never easy. Never forget your, Stevie's charitable, blessed wonder-retard-land. Don't you need to plan for your Colorado trip or something? The family needs you Stevie. Yes Ravi, they need me, and I need them. Son totaled the '99 Cadillac Deville (5 mile/hr. crash) that I got basically for free as it was abandoned near my place of business. I never wanted him to have it anyway, for just that reason.* So, found a '99 Honda Accord for $1,900.00. Now that makes sense for a 20 yr. old! Family life Ravi, family life. Plenty of ups and downs. * do you have any idea how strange it looked for him to make deliveries for Jimmy Johns in Cadillac Deville, fully loaded. Someone asked him if his friends were jealous. He said, no, but their dad's were!! On 7/3/13 4:48 PM, seventhray27 wrote: This is good stuff Ravi. Kind of fun to see a department of redundancy department in action. You remind of a dog chasing its own tail. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYKcxnjFRAE --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Barry Wright - the only person to comprehensively demonstrate dishonesty, sadistic obsessiveness and narcissistic, sociopathic traits on FFL. This man is definitely psychologically ill or a very sick, twisted, demented person - dishonest, sadistic, obsessive, narcissistic and sociopathic. Even his family is not spared from his narcissistic traits - he is brutally insensitive to his own brother's need in order to gloat and make himself look at his expense. Barry will accuse others of being narcissistic, sociopathic, attention sluts, attention whores, obsessive, argumentative - this is entire schtick. A really pathetic, sad existence indeed. But unfortunately several people here enable him for their own selfish vindictive needs (Xeno) or their own perverse subjective reflexes and their perverse preservation of their ontological sameness (Steve, Share). These people are the worst - enabling a mentally sick person or a seriously twisted, demented person. Their justifications in themselves are pretty hilarious. Xeno - Barry is some kind of a disinterested, tantra Guru that hits at the core delusion of others. Steve/seventhray27 - Barry is expressing difference of opinion, he just has blind spots like anyone else. He's the most happiest because he
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL
PS I have borrowed the movie Lincoln from the library and plan to watch it today, yay! SPOILER ALERT: It doesn't end well for him. Happy 4th!!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Ravi, I agree with Steve and last night had already decided to include the whole situation in my prayers. Just now I was wondering, and it's none of my business but still wonder if your ex is mainly concerned that you will turn the boys against Amma. Anyway, hope you have a good weekend. Same to everyone in the Funny Farm Lounge, Happy Independence Day! PS I have borrowed the movie Lincoln from the library and plan to watch it today, yay! From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:29 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL  I do recommend the yellow car. Wife just got a 2013 sun yellow VW Beetle Coupe (no convertible). Couldn't wait to jettison the mini van (second one) she's been driving for the last 17 years. I hope your ex relents and gets her priorities in order. I know you are a gem of a father. Really a sin to limit contact.  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Awesome Steve - I have a 4 day vacation, starting now - will be driving down to the San Francisco very shortly. Interesting story about the car, I plan to give my '09 Civic to my kid who turns 15 and half in November i.e. if my ex agrees. She's too fucking mad since I started writing against Amma and hasn't returned any emails since last August. Very interesting that her love for the cult and some religious, delusional fantasies is more important than having her kids have contact with their father - I'm still hopeful considering I could buy a new car - a yellow convertible was my plan, I'm not so sure. Why does a mad, reclusive yogi like me need a Yellow convertible - total BS that - I'm still debating, if there was a woman in the picture yeah, anyway it hasn't been decided to my satisfaction yet. Happy 4th to you and everyone else !!! On 7/3/2013 5:29 PM, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Very good Stevie - I don't want you to get too stressed out over all this. Okay Ravi, I'll try to stay cool. Of course right now *I am* chillin' . Just had some pasta carbanara from the Cheesecake Factory. Yum. No work for maybe four days, yay!, and then vacation. Actually have a lot of work (work) to do to get ready for vacation. Never easy. Never forget your, Stevie's charitable, blessed wonder-retard-land. Don't you need to plan for your Colorado trip or something? The family needs you Stevie. Yes Ravi, they need me, and I need them. Son totaled the '99 Cadillac Deville (5 mile/hr. crash) that I got basically for free as it was abandoned near my place of business. I never wanted him to have it anyway, for just that reason.* So, found a '99 Honda Accord for $1,900.00. Now that makes sense for a 20 yr. old! Family life Ravi, family life. Plenty of ups and downs. * do you have any idea how strange it looked for him to make deliveries for Jimmy Johns in Cadillac Deville, fully loaded. Someone asked him if his friends were jealous. He said, no, but their dad's were!! On 7/3/13 4:48 PM, seventhray27 wrote: This is good stuff Ravi. Kind of fun to see a department of redundancy department in action. You remind of a dog chasing its own tail. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYKcxnjFRAE --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Barry Wright - the only person to comprehensively demonstrate dishonesty, sadistic obsessiveness and narcissistic, sociopathic traits on FFL. This man is definitely psychologically ill or a very sick, twisted, demented person - dishonest, sadistic, obsessive, narcissistic and sociopathic. Even his family is not spared from his narcissistic traits - he is brutally insensitive to his own brother's need in order to gloat and make himself look at his expense. Barry will accuse others of being narcissistic, sociopathic, attention sluts, attention whores, obsessive, argumentative - this is entire schtick. A really pathetic, sad existence indeed. But unfortunately several people here enable him for their own selfish vindictive needs (Xeno) or their own perverse subjective reflexes and their perverse preservation of their ontological sameness (Steve, Share). These people are the worst - enabling a mentally sick person or a seriously twisted, demented person
[FairfieldLife] Re: Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL
Sounds like you were saved by TM. You should be very grateful to Maharishi. One day you may realize that Maharishi was your brother and friend. He tried to help you. And it appears that for a while you were able to respond. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote: I have not drunk al-kee-hall in years. When I did drink, I did so to get drunk, not because of how anything tasted with or without food - I was mighty partial to tequila and lots of it - if there was none of that, then bourbon. I never cared for beer but drank plenty of it. Slacked off on the drinking somewhat when I discovered pot, although pot and wine seemed a good fit - stopped it all to do TM - should-a stuck with whiskey. From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL Â Well I like his writing too. I'm talking about enabling his behavior. I hope you understand the difference. As of today you haven't MJ - so you are good. You can now open your 12 pack Natural Light and start drinking now - yay !!! On 7/3/13 4:45 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: Â you forgot me, I like Barry and his writing From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 7:16 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry Wright's psychological fingerprint and his enablers on FFL Â Barry Wright - the only person to comprehensively demonstrate dishonesty, sadistic obsessiveness and narcissistic, sociopathic traits on FFL. This man is definitely psychologically ill or a very sick, twisted, demented person - dishonest, sadistic, obsessive, narcissistic and sociopathic. Even his family is not spared from his narcissistic traits - he is brutally insensitive to his own brother's need in order to gloat and make himself look at his expense. Barry will accuse others of being narcissistic, sociopathic, attention sluts, attention whores, obsessive, argumentative - this is entire schtick. A really pathetic, sad existence indeed. But unfortunately several people here enable him for their own selfish vindictive needs (Xeno) or their own perverse subjective reflexes and their perverse preservation of their ontological sameness (Steve, Share). These people are the worst - enabling a mentally sick person or a seriously twisted, demented person. Their justifications in themselves are pretty hilarious. Xeno - Barry is some kind of a disinterested, tantra Guru that hits at the core delusion of others. Steve/seventhray27 - Barry is expressing difference of opinion, he just has blind spots like anyone else. He's the most happiest because he lives in on of the best cities and works for one of the best companies. Share - at least she's honest today and admits to being triggered and suffering from attachment disorder. Anyway she in the past has talked from Barry as some disinterested observer. Apparently his pictures with a young girl were conclusive enough for her to demonstrate at Barry's happiness. Susan - she never has time to even read the posts. She gets triggered by arguments and thinks Barry is a good writer. Clearly some naive, childish feeling about Barry she holds on to despite all the evidence to the contrary. She will refuse to inspect any facts, evidence contrary to her naive beliefs.
