Re: FreeBSD based router ...

2008-05-29 Thread Wojciech Puchar



small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free.


486 hardware with three NICs, a CF drive, and run off of a few watts of DC 
power tend not to free.


that's the adventage. but edimax 6104K router with 5 ethernets running 
netbsd is both cheaper smaller and faster with it's 175Mhz 2 instr/cycle 
MIPS CPU. 16MB RAM+2MB flash isn't much but enough to fit.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page 
was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
'94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
mozilla, firefox, a couple others.

About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event 
feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things 
were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.

Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
things on a .php or .html page.  

Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
editors in ports?

I'd be much obliged for any help here.


gary






-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt

Don't bother, Gary.

  The world is moving towards CMS systems for hosting websites.

  The ultra-cheapo people use godaddy's site builder and
put crap on a crappy-looking interface.

  The better hosting companies each have their own site builders
and look better, and are populated by acres of garden-variety corporate
and the occassional personal sites.

  Very, very few people custom-write sites in HTML anymore.
Most people use sitebuilding software (frontpage was the original,
it's deprecated now in favor of other newer tools) either running
on their PC or on the server.

  black text on blue is terribly hard to read for most people,
read up on how the human eye works to understand why.

  Put your time into loading a CMS system on your server then
create your site in it.  Yes the learning curve is steep in
the beginning but it's not rote memorization of HTML tags.  It
is understanding how all the things work together.

Ted

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Kline
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:58 PM
 To: FreeBSD Mailing List
 Subject: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.
 
 
   Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page 
   was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
   on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
   firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
   '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
   mozilla, firefox, a couple others.
 
   About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
   flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event 
   feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
   on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things 
   were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.
 
   Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
   it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
   it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
   things on a .php or .html page.  
 
   Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
   what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
   other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
   learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
   my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
   editors in ports?
 
   I'd be much obliged for any help here.
 
 
   gary
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
   Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Kevin Downey
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Don't bother, Gary.

  The world is moving towards CMS systems for hosting websites.

  The ultra-cheapo people use godaddy's site builder and
 put crap on a crappy-looking interface.

  The better hosting companies each have their own site builders
 and look better, and are populated by acres of garden-variety corporate
 and the occassional personal sites.

  Very, very few people custom-write sites in HTML anymore.
 Most people use sitebuilding software (frontpage was the original,
 it's deprecated now in favor of other newer tools) either running
 on their PC or on the server.

  black text on blue is terribly hard to read for most people,
 read up on how the human eye works to understand why.

  Put your time into loading a CMS system on your server then
 create your site in it.  Yes the learning curve is steep in
 the beginning but it's not rote memorization of HTML tags.  It
 is understanding how all the things work together.

 Ted

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Kline
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:58 PM
 To: FreeBSD Mailing List
 Subject: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.


   Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
   was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
   on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
   firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
   '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
   mozilla, firefox, a couple others.

   About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
   flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
   feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
   on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
   were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.

   Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
   it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
   it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
   things on a .php or .html page.

   Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
   what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
   other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
   learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
   my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
   editors in ports?

   I'd be much obliged for any help here.


   gary






 --
   Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org



Let be the first of many to say, please do not top post.
In a recent interview it was revealed that the New York Times does a
lot of by hand html writing because it just gets you better html.
Konq uses more or less the same rendering engine as Safari.

http://iamvoodoochile.redgrapellc.com/uploaded_images/1985-741912.jpg
-- break down of modern webdesign

-- 
The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of
personal relationships.
 Fisheye
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Christian Zachariasen
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
'94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
mozilla, firefox, a couple others.

About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.

Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
things on a .php or .html page.

Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
editors in ports?

I'd be much obliged for any help here.


gary






 --
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org


 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I say keep using the technique you're using now. That's what I'd do. Instead
of finding a HTML Editor
just find a simple text editor and write all your HTML in a clean manner.

I don't know where Ted got his statistics from, but most people I know use
simple text editors for writing their HTML, CSS
and JavaScript. Personally I stick to vi or diakonos on BSD and Notepad2 on
Windows.

Christian Zachariasen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Gary Kline wrote:

   Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
   what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
   other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
   learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
   my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
   editors in ports?


It's  bit OT really. But wotthehell, wotthehell.  I've found the best approach
is to make liberal use of http://validator.w3.org/ -- if your HTML validates
correctly according to which ever standard you apply, and similarly if your CSS
validates correctly as CSS 2.0 then you should get a pretty similar result in
virtually all browsers.  Use HTML Tidy  (ports: www/tidy-devel) to clean up your
HTML automatically, and strongly prefer CSS over in-line formatting as tidy 
steers
you towards.

One thing to watch out for though is an important difference between the XHTML 
1.0
standard and the HTML 4.01 standard (http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/) XHTML 1.0 is an 
XML
language and should be served using the 'application/xml+xhtml' MIME type, 
unlike
HTML 4.01 which should be served as 'text/html' 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020801/)

I've found that this can make quite a difference to the way a page is rendered
in FireFox.  The HTML 4.01 standard is probably your best bet for maximum
interoperability with all sorts of different desktop browsers, whereas XHTML is 
better
if you need access by stuff like Mobile Phones or text-to-speech systems for the
blind.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   Flat 3
  7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
  Kent, CT11 9PW, UK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREDAAYFAkg+XgQACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VanhwCfYBTlfL0r6Jz1iwaq7RYgfKde
sYsAoKO8lsylmdCPMMcF4JRk93fJ675h
=khay
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Renaming root to homer?

2008-05-29 Thread Gilles
Hello

With all those scripts trying to connect to SSHd as root, I was
wondering if it'd be OK to rename this account to eg. homer, to act
as a first line of defense?

Are there unknown consequences to doing something like that?

If not, is it done by just editing /etc/password with vi, or is there
a better way?

Thank you.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Renaming root to homer?

2008-05-29 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Gilles wrote:
 Hello

 With all those scripts trying to connect to SSHd as root, I was
 wondering if it'd be OK to rename this account to eg. homer, to act
 as a first line of defense?

 Are there unknown consequences to doing something like that?

 If not, is it done by just editing /etc/password with vi, or is there
 a better way?

 Thank you.

Unless you have explicitly set PermitRootLogin to yes in /etc/ssh/sshd_config, 
it is not possible to login as root using ssh. 

-- 
Pieter de Goeje

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Renaming root to homer?

2008-05-29 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:48:27 +0200, Pieter de Goeje
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you have explicitly set PermitRootLogin to yes in /etc/ssh/sshd_config, 
it is not possible to login as root using ssh. 

Right. I did this because I was tired of having to log on as homer and
then sudo'ing to root, using two complicated passwords :-/

I guess I should learn how to use public/private keys instead.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Renaming root to homer?

2008-05-29 Thread Christian Zachariasen
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gilles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello

 With all those scripts trying to connect to SSHd as root, I was
 wondering if it'd be OK to rename this account to eg. homer, to act
 as a first line of defense?

 Are there unknown consequences to doing something like that?

 If not, is it done by just editing /etc/password with vi, or is there
 a better way?

 Thank you.

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sorry, forgot to send this to the mailing list as well:

Not recommended.

Instead edit your sshd_config file and change the option PermitRootLogin to
no.

Christian Zachariasen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SATA support custom v7.0 kernel

2008-05-29 Thread Colin Brace

Hi all,

I'd like to add a SATA drive to a P4 box that I use as a gateway/server.
The MB doesn't have a SATA interface, so I stuck an Initio-based SATA card
in the box. The kernel recognizes the card, but the attached drive wasn't
displayed when I started up sysinstall to format it. I'm wondering whether
I am missing SATA support. I commented out a bunch of stuff such as the
SCSI controllers when I compiled the kernel with ALTQ support, but these
options *are* included:
 
# SCSI peripherals
device  scbus  # SCSI bus (required for SCSI)
device  ch # SCSI media changers
device  da # Direct Access (disks)
device  sa # Sequential Access (tape etc)
device  cd # CD
device  pass   # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access)
device  ses# SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE)

Should this be enough? I don't see any specific references to SATA in the
handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html

Thanks.

$ uname -a
FreeBSD venus.lim.nl 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #4: Mon Mar  3 15:07:21
CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VENUS  i386

-- 
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Renaming root to homer?

2008-05-29 Thread Mike Clarke
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Gilles wrote:

 On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:48:27 +0200, Pieter de Goeje

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Unless you have explicitly set PermitRootLogin to yes in
  /etc/ssh/sshd_config, it is not possible to login as root using
  ssh.

 Right. I did this because I was tired of having to log on as homer
 and then sudo'ing to root, using two complicated passwords :-/

 I guess I should learn how to use public/private keys instead.

If using keys instead of passwords you could consider setting 
PermitRootLogin to without-password. It's a misleading choice of name 
for the option but it ensures that root using ssh must use keys instead 
of a password. Adding your own public key to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys 
on the remote machine avoids the need for you to remember the remote 
password.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


mpd5 stoped working after subnet change

2008-05-29 Thread Reinhold
Hi

I'm using mpd5 for pptp connections and last night I had to change our
subnet from 192.168.1.0/24 to 10.1.10.0/24 after I've made all the changes
to all the config files I rebooted and everything is working except for
pptp.
I'm using mpd5 for 2 x adsl pppoe and pptp.

Here is the pptp section
pptp:
set ippool add pool1 10.1.10.220 10.1.10.239

create bundle template B
set iface enable proxy-arp
set iface idle 1800
set iface enable tcpmssfix
set ipcp yes vjcomp
set ipcp ranges 10.1.10.1/32 ippool pool1
set ipcp dns 10.1.10.5 208.67.222.222

set bundle enable compression
set bundle enable crypt-reqd
set ccp yes mppc
set mppc yes e40
set mppc yes e128
set mppc yes stateless

create link template L pptp
set link action bundle B
set link enable multilink
set link yes acfcomp protocomp
set link no pap chap
set link enable chap
set link keep-alive 10 60
set link mtu 1460

set pptp self external-ip
set link enable incoming

and then in my pf.conf
if_pptp = { ng2, ng3, ng4, ng5, ng6, ng7, ng8, ng9, ng10, ng11,
ng12, ng13, ng14, ng15, ng16, ng17, ng18, mg19, ng20, ng21 }

# PPTP in WAN1
pass quick log on $ext_if1 inet proto gre all keep state
pass quick log on $ext_if1 proto {tcp, udp } from any to 217.41.34.61 port
= 1723 keep state
pass quick log on $if_pptp from any to any keep state

I'm getting an Error 800: Unable to establish a VPN connection.
This used to work well before I changed the subnet last night.

Any idea why its not working anymore?
Thanks
Reinhold

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2008-05-28T23:57:35-07:00, Gary Kline wrote:

 Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly what
 causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any other
 ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the learning
 curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for my home
 page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML editors in
 ports?

My suggestion would be to just write HTML which conforms to a
standard.  For instance, the main page at your Web site
`www.thought.org' declares its DOCTYPE as W3C HTML 4.01 Transitional,
but validating it at http://validator.w3.org/ against that standard
produces several errors.  If all those errors are fixed, your pages
will be rendered properly by all browsers that support these
standards, see, e.g.,

  http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/abdesign3.html
  http://browsehappy.com/browsers/

As for editors, I suggest Emacs with PSGML mode (editors/psgml).
Rather than depending on the validator at W3C, you can install
textproc/opensp, and use onsgmls(1) to validate your HTML documents
without traversing the Internet, with something like

  onsgmls -c ~/catalog -egsu foo.html

HTH,
Raghavendra.

-- 
N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.retrotexts.net/
Harish-Chandra Research Institute   | http://www.mri.ernet.in/
See message headers for contact and OpenPGP information.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: External USB disk won't mount

2008-05-29 Thread Mark Ovens

Roland Smith wrote:

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:37:55PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:

Roland Smith wrote:


You could try using the atausb driver instead of umass. Unfortunately it
doesn't have a manpage yet, but you have to unload umass if you want to
use atausb.



Thanks Roland, but I can't find atausb in either 6.3 or 7.0 - is it a kld 
module?


Yes;

$ locate atausb
/usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atausb
/usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atausb/Makefile

(This is on 7-STABLE)

Presumably, it would not work with other usb mass storage devices like 
memory sticks or phones?


It should work with all usb mass storage devices, I think. It just seems
to be tied into the ata subsystem instead of into the scsi subsystem via
atapicam.



Hi Roland,

I had to rebuild the kernel without umass in it first, but here's the 
result.


It attaches the device as an ata rather than umass - but no devices are 
created for the slices/partitions on the disk.


atausb0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
ata2: USB lun 0 on atausb0
/boot/kernel{105}# ls /dev/ata*
/dev/ata
/boot/kernel{106}# ls /dev/ad*
ls: No match.
/boot/kernel{107}# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
 1   10 0xc040 4e1cb8   kernel
 21 0xc08e2000 21ef8linux.ko
 31 0xc0904000 65de0acpi.ko
 41 0xc5898000 5000 atausb.ko
 51 0xc589d000 d000 ata.ko
/boot/kernel{108}#

I've only tried it on 6.3 at the moment and atausb/Makefile didn't 
exist, so I copied it from 7.0, it built and installed without error, 
the module kldload'd without error, and it finds the device so I assume 
it should be OK in 6.3 even though the Makefile doesn't get cvsup'd?


Regards,

Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Delaying mount of UFS filesystem in ZFS pool

2008-05-29 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 02:04:56PM -0700, Aaron Holmes wrote:
 I have a UFS filesystem inside a zpool:
 tank on /tank (zfs, local)
 /dev/zvol/tank/ufs on /mnt/ufs (ufs, local, acls)
 
 If I add that entry (/dev/zvol/tank/ufs) to /etc/fstab, it will try to 
 mount as a critical filesystem on boot, however, because ZFS hasn't yet 
 loaded, this fails and causes all sorts of fun for me.
 Currently I have that filesystem mounting via a cronjob that checks 
 every minute if it's mounted.. definitely not ideal.
 
 I need this filesystem in /etc/fstab so I can setup quotas on it (if 
 there is some other way to get quotas working, great, point me to a link 
 or two).
 
 So what I'm thinking for a solution is to delay the mount of this 
 filesystem until ZFS has loaded, but I'm not sure of a way to do this 
 with the filesystem in /etc/fstab, and without extensive hacking to one 
 or more rc scripts.
 
 Ideas?

Adding 'late' flag in Options section to the fstab entry may help,
although I don't think it will help with quotas:

# rcorder /etc/rc.d/*
[...]
/etc/rc.d/mountcritlocal
[...]
/etc/rc.d/zfs
[...]
/etc/rc.d/mountcritremote
[...]
/etc/rc.d/quota
[...]
/etc/rc.d/mountlate
[...]

We might consider running rc.d/quota after rc.d/mountlate, not sure if
it won't break something else. I added freebsd-rc@ to CC.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek   http://www.wheel.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!


pgpDVThx2XiWV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: zfs list and non-root user

2008-05-29 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi,

even if the zfs module is loaded I get the error message:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ kldstat | grep zfs
 71 0xfcc1c000 80ee8zfs.ko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ zfs list
internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library


Anyway thx for the info.. At least now I know why it should not work ;-)

bye
Norman



2008/5/29 Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:41:28PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, at 15:13:16 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  is it normal that I can't do a 'zfs list' ( for example ) as non-root
  user ?
 
  $ zfs list
  internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library
 
  I think there is really a use case for use some zfs commands as
  non-root user..
 
  Thx
  Norman

 Hi.

 One way to do this as a non-root user is to add the account to the
 operator group. This is what I do on my personal desktop machine
 and it has worked fine, but I understand that may not be best in all
 cases.

 You might also try changing the permissions on /dev/zfs. I don't do
 this method and I'm not sure if it's a proper way, but from trying it
 very briefly it seems to work correctly with the user not in the
 operator group.

 In Solaris anyone can open /dev/zfs and the kernel side of ZFS decides
 if the user has permission to perform some action or not. In FreeBSD we
 try to be more careful for now, but it will change soon, once we import
 delegated administration functionality.

 Although... The error above (failed to initialize ZFS library) most
 likely means that zfs.ko module wasn't loaded. zfs(8) tries to do that
 automatically, but of course it will only succeed if we are root. In
 this case zfs.ko has to be manually loaded by root and then members of
 operator group can use zfs(8) command.

 --
 Pawel Jakub Dawidek   http://www.wheel.pl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FreeBSD.org
 FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: External USB disk won't mount

2008-05-29 Thread Mark Ovens

Mark Ovens wrote:

Hi Roland,

I had to rebuild the kernel without umass in it first, but here's the 
result.




Follow up:

I discovered that atausb wants to attach the disk as a floppy and I 
don't have a FD so the module isn;t compiled into my kernel.


kldload'd atapifd.ko and it now sees the disk as afd0 - but it crashes 
the kernel (in 6.3) just like umass did in 7.0, Fatal Trap 12.


Built atausb in 7.0 and same thing.

Guess I'll just have to accept that I've bought a pup - I've noticed 
that the USB2.0 Hi-Speed logo on the box is not the official one so I 
guess it just doesn't comply with the USB standards.


If anyone can tell me how to debug this to try to get to the cause so a 
fix can be found then I'm happy to spend the time doing so.


Regards,

Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: Kevin Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Let be the first of many to say, please do not top post.

Let me be the first to say please don't quote the entire posting
and the entire response.

 In a recent interview it was revealed that the New York Times does a
 lot of by hand html writing because it just gets you better html.

Of course it does.  And I would expect a really professional
site to do so.  But, your not paying attention to what he is
saying:

... trying to determine exactly what causes firefox and konq to diverge...

An html author who writes by hand MUST know about ALL browser 
idiosyncracies.  The OP does not want to know this or he would
have TESTED with all browsers years ago.  And the context indicates
he really doesen't want to know.

...I've never learned an HTML editors because of the learning curve...

Have you visited this guy's website and actually READ it?  This
isn't a stupid person here.  Anyone who gets an engineering degree
is perfectly capabably of surmounting the learning curve.  He
DOESEN'T WANT TO DO IT.

His website IS NOT the usual techie website full of instructions
on how to write better html, use this, that and so on.  He's simply
not interested in that - at least, not enough to actually want to
spend any time learning an HTML editor.

He doesen't WANT to surmount the learning curve, it is NOT that
he CAN'T DO IT.

What he wants is a shortcut, a means to QUICKLY get what he
has to say online, with minimal work, that will look OK in
all browsers.  He doesen't want the world's greatest website.
He just wants it good enough so that people will read his
philosophy, which is what he is really interested in.  Not
all this html stuff.

This comprises the VAST MAJORITY of all people posting stuff to
the web.  Of course, most of them are using template sites,
or myspace, or facebook, or whatever.  You might think a facebook
user isn't a web designer, but she thinks she is.  She is doing
the same thing a web designer does - put her information onto
the web so other people can read it.  And she is using a CMS
that takes care of all the icky details of making her stuff
look the same across all browsers.

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: zfs list and non-root user

2008-05-29 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:41:28PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, at 15:13:16 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
  Hi all,
  
  is it normal that I can't do a 'zfs list' ( for example ) as non-root
  user ? 
  
  $ zfs list
  internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library
  
  I think there is really a use case for use some zfs commands as
  non-root user..
  
  Thx
  Norman
 
 Hi.
 
 One way to do this as a non-root user is to add the account to the
 operator group. This is what I do on my personal desktop machine
 and it has worked fine, but I understand that may not be best in all
 cases.
 
 You might also try changing the permissions on /dev/zfs. I don't do
 this method and I'm not sure if it's a proper way, but from trying it
 very briefly it seems to work correctly with the user not in the
 operator group.

In Solaris anyone can open /dev/zfs and the kernel side of ZFS decides
if the user has permission to perform some action or not. In FreeBSD we
try to be more careful for now, but it will change soon, once we import
delegated administration functionality.

Although... The error above (failed to initialize ZFS library) most
likely means that zfs.ko module wasn't loaded. zfs(8) tries to do that
automatically, but of course it will only succeed if we are root. In
this case zfs.ko has to be manually loaded by root and then members of
operator group can use zfs(8) command.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek   http://www.wheel.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!


pgpFjNMczD1Yo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Best way of upgrading postgresql in production?

2008-05-29 Thread Gunther Mayer

Hi guys,

I've been grappling with this and read all sorts of email threads and 
blog posts but I still have no good solution to the following problem: I 
want to upgrade a postgresql installation on FreeBSD 6.3 from 8.2 to 8.3 
as we'd like to take advantage of its new features and performance 
enhancements. Yet none of the ports system offers no clean _and_ quick 
way of performing such an upgrade as the Makefiles of the respective 
ports choke as soon as they detect an existing older -server or -client.


Yet all I want to do is in a script which fires automatically at 5am via 
cron (of course I'll get up to check just in case but I've done this 
many times before):


  1. Do all backup tasks (build packages for all installed postgresql
 8.2 stuff for possible rollback, full database dump, configs etc.)
 and take down all processes that write to the db
  2. Shut down the database
  3. Uninstall all postgresql 8.2 ports (client, server and client libs
 we depend on)
  4. Install all postgresql 8.3 ports
  5. Fire up the new db, restore the complete database dump
  6. Restore the configs (pg_hba.conf, postgresql.conf etc.) and
 restart the database
  7. Start up all db write services again

Ideally that process shouldn't take longer than 5 minutes but step 
number 4 is currently a big stumbling block as


   * Building from ports will take a while
   * I can't find any binary packages for 8.3 (would need i386 for
 testing and amd64 for live) anywhere as far as I can see
 (ftp.freebsd.org has nothing, nor do the mirrors)
   * building binary packages myself is impossible on the same machines
 as pkg_create can only do that with installed packages, make
 package et. all choke when they realise you already have
 82-{client,server} installed and I don't see any other way of
 creating a package without installing one

How can I get out of this catch-22 /without /resorting to complicated 
jail setups or even worse, manual compilations with different prefixes 
and other nasties? There must be a way to get a package somehow...


Gunther
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: External USB disk won't mount

2008-05-29 Thread Bob McConnell
From: Mark Ovens

 If anyone can tell me how to debug this to try to get to the cause so
a 
 fix can be found then I'm happy to spend the time doing so.

Unless you are already familiar with the drivers and the bus itself, or
want to learn more about it than anyone should ever need to know, it is
not likely to be a productive use of your time. Another alternative
would be to contact whomever is maintaining the driver and see if they
would be willing to take the broken device off your hands and modify the
driver to deal with it.

I haven't tried working with USB, but from what I know of other
interfaces, the first two things you are going to need are a bus sniffer
tool and a copy of the USB spec. Unless you can find where someone else
has diagnosed this device and published what they found, you are looking
at trying to identify where this implementation deviates from the
official documents and modify a driver to work with that deviation. It
might be they use non-standard commands, or the timing of some sequences
may not be correct.

I would return it as defective and replace it with a different product.
The non-standard seal of approval would also suggest a complaint to the
group that owns the genuine seal, and possibly one to your local
consumer rights advocate.

Good luck,

Bob McConnell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD based router ...

2008-05-29 Thread Steve Bertrand

Marc G. Fournier wrote:


Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off of FreeBSD?


In all seriousness, if you want to roll your own based on FreeBSD, I 
have a couple of these units that I've been testing internally with that 
run FreeBSD off of a thumb drive.


They are being used to test the Quality of Quagga's implementation of 
BGP, and seem to run very well.


I haven't gone as far to really test them for pps or throughput yet, but 
they hold up well, no moving parts, not much more $ than a decent 
whitebox, and much smaller.


Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD based router ...

2008-05-29 Thread Steve Bertrand

Steve Bertrand wrote:

Marc G. Fournier wrote:


Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off 
of FreeBSD?


In all seriousness, if you want to roll your own based on FreeBSD, I 
have a couple of these units that I've been testing internally with that 
run FreeBSD off of a thumb drive.


Darn it, I forgot to send the link:

http://www.mikrotikrouter.com

Using the thumb drive allows me to swap out router configs quickly, 
without having to open the box up.


Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: help with options BRIDGE in freebsd 7.0

2008-05-29 Thread Reid Linnemann
Written by cp on 05/28/08 17:28
 I'd really appreciate if someone can shed some light on this for me. I'm
 attempting to build a layer2 sniffer using dummynet and ipfw but I'm
 having some problems building the new kernel with options BRIDGE. It
 errors out with the message below. Any suggestions? 
 
 -cp
 
 lois# /usr/sbin/config LOIS 
 LOIS: unknown option BRIDGE
 freebsd version  = 7.0
 
 lois# more LOIS | grep IP
 options IPSEC
 options IPSEC_FILTERTUNNEL
 options IPSEC_DEBUG
 options IPFIREWALL
 options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
 options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100
 options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
 options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
 options IPDIVERT
 options IPFILTER
 options IPFILTER_LOG
 lois# more LOIS | grep BR
 options NETGRAPH_BRIDGE
 options BRIDGE
 
 lois# more LOIS | grep DUM
 options DUMMYNET
 lois#
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

That's because the BRIDGE kernel option is deprecated in FreeBSD 7. Look
at if_bridge(4).
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way of upgrading postgresql in production?

2008-05-29 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Gunther Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 I've been grappling with this and read all sorts of email threads and 
 blog posts but I still have no good solution to the following problem: I 
 want to upgrade a postgresql installation on FreeBSD 6.3 from 8.2 to 8.3 
 as we'd like to take advantage of its new features and performance 
 enhancements. Yet none of the ports system offers no clean _and_ quick 
 way of performing such an upgrade as the Makefiles of the respective 
 ports choke as soon as they detect an existing older -server or -client.
 
 Yet all I want to do is in a script which fires automatically at 5am via 
 cron (of course I'll get up to check just in case but I've done this 
 many times before):
 
1. Do all backup tasks (build packages for all installed postgresql
   8.2 stuff for possible rollback, full database dump, configs etc.)
   and take down all processes that write to the db
2. Shut down the database
3. Uninstall all postgresql 8.2 ports (client, server and client libs
   we depend on)
4. Install all postgresql 8.3 ports
5. Fire up the new db, restore the complete database dump
6. Restore the configs (pg_hba.conf, postgresql.conf etc.) and
   restart the database
7. Start up all db write services again
 
 Ideally that process shouldn't take longer than 5 minutes but step 
 number 4 is currently a big stumbling block as
 
 * Building from ports will take a while
 * I can't find any binary packages for 8.3 (would need i386 for
   testing and amd64 for live) anywhere as far as I can see
   (ftp.freebsd.org has nothing, nor do the mirrors)
 * building binary packages myself is impossible on the same machines
   as pkg_create can only do that with installed packages, make
   package et. all choke when they realise you already have
   82-{client,server} installed and I don't see any other way of
   creating a package without installing one
 
 How can I get out of this catch-22 /without /resorting to complicated 
 jail setups or even worse, manual compilations with different prefixes 
 and other nasties? There must be a way to get a package somehow...

Jail setups are not complicated.  You could also make the packages on
another system.  How about doing a make package on the server that you've
tested your application against 8.3 on?  You _have_ done that, right?

What makes you think that jail setups are so complicated.  I set up new
jails almost every week.  I get the impression that you have some reason
for avoiding the obvious solution, and I suspect it revolves around some
incorrect impression that jails are complicated.

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD based router ...

2008-05-29 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg

On May 29, 2008, at 1:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:

that's the adventage. but edimax 6104K router with 5 ethernets  
running netbsd is both cheaper smaller and faster with it's 175Mhz 2  
instr/cycle MIPS CPU. 16MB RAM+2MB flash isn't much but enough to fit.


I will keep that in mind the next time I need to build or recommend or  
purchase such a device.  I wasn't aware that you could get NetBSD with  
enough usable tools on 2MB, but I see that now.


Thank you,

-j



--
Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Monitoring raid status

2008-05-29 Thread Matias Surdi

Hi list,

I have a new FreeBSD 7.0 installation with a HighPoint RocketRAID 2310 
with 4 Disks.


is there a way to check the raidstatus for the raid and/or is there a 
way to let smartmontools check the disks?



Thanks.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Monitoring raid status

2008-05-29 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:00:56PM +0200, Matias Surdi wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 I have a new FreeBSD 7.0 installation with a HighPoint RocketRAID 2310 
 with 4 Disks.
 
 is there a way to check the raidstatus for the raid and/or is there a 
 way to let smartmontools check the disks?
 

I believe HighPoint themselves provide some RAID management utilities
for FreeBSD.  Take a look at http://www.highpoint-tech.com/

If that is not suitable I suspect you are out of luck since HighPoint
as not AFAIK released much in the way of documentation or source code
for those cards.




-- 
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread David Kelly
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:57:35PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
   Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page 
   was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
   on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
   firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
   '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
   mozilla, firefox, a couple others.

Others have suggested online validators. /usr/ports/www/tidy is another
that can check your code, even attempt repairs. Can also be used to
standardize the coding format much like GNU indent for C code. Comes
built-in to BBEdit on Mac where I do most of my HTML authoring.

Eyeballing your code the first thing that stood out was:

BACKGROUND=/usr/local/www/data/Graphics/paper0.jpg

Don't think that will work for anyone other than yourself, and only when
you are on the server itself. Unless one has a file with that exact same
name and path.

-- 
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way of upgrading postgresql in production?

2008-05-29 Thread Gunther Mayer

Bill Moran wrote:

In response to Gunther Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
I've been grappling with this and read all sorts of email threads and 
blog posts but I still have no good solution to the following problem: I 
want to upgrade a postgresql installation on FreeBSD 6.3 from 8.2 to 8.3 
as we'd like to take advantage of its new features and performance 
enhancements. Yet none of the ports system offers no clean _and_ quick 
way of performing such an upgrade as the Makefiles of the respective 
ports choke as soon as they detect an existing older -server or -client.


Yet all I want to do is in a script which fires automatically at 5am via 
cron (of course I'll get up to check just in case but I've done this 
many times before):


   1. Do all backup tasks (build packages for all installed postgresql
  8.2 stuff for possible rollback, full database dump, configs etc.)
  and take down all processes that write to the db
   2. Shut down the database
   3. Uninstall all postgresql 8.2 ports (client, server and client libs
  we depend on)
   4. Install all postgresql 8.3 ports
   5. Fire up the new db, restore the complete database dump
   6. Restore the configs (pg_hba.conf, postgresql.conf etc.) and
  restart the database
   7. Start up all db write services again

Ideally that process shouldn't take longer than 5 minutes but step 
number 4 is currently a big stumbling block as


* Building from ports will take a while
* I can't find any binary packages for 8.3 (would need i386 for
  testing and amd64 for live) anywhere as far as I can see
  (ftp.freebsd.org has nothing, nor do the mirrors)
* building binary packages myself is impossible on the same machines
  as pkg_create can only do that with installed packages, make
  package et. all choke when they realise you already have
  82-{client,server} installed and I don't see any other way of
  creating a package without installing one

How can I get out of this catch-22 /without /resorting to complicated 
jail setups or even worse, manual compilations with different prefixes 
and other nasties? There must be a way to get a package somehow...



Jail setups are not complicated.  You could also make the packages on
another system.  How about doing a make package on the server that you've
tested your application against 8.3 on?  You _have_ done that, right?
  
That's not an option since my testing box runs i386 while the live one 
runs amd64, I guess I should really invest in a testing box with the 
same arch...

What makes you think that jail setups are so complicated.  I set up new
jails almost every week.  I get the impression that you have some reason
for avoiding the obvious solution, and I suspect it revolves around some
incorrect impression that jails are complicated.
Ok, you're probably right, I just haven't worked with jails before and 
have just read the wrong articles. I will investigate how I could 
install the newer version in a jail and keep both running at the same 
time during the upgrade, I'll probably run into more problems along the 
way but will post again if I'm stuck.


Thanks,

Gunther
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Delaying mount of UFS filesystem in ZFS pool

2008-05-29 Thread Aaron Holmes
I didn't think of mountlate, that may work. What I ended up doing was 
adding the noauto option and running a cronjob that checks and mounts 
the filesystem.
Unfortunately, I learned that quotas only apply to mount points and not 
directories, so I may not be of any use for testing new things in the 
near future.


Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 02:04:56PM -0700, Aaron Holmes wrote:
  

I have a UFS filesystem inside a zpool:
tank on /tank (zfs, local)
/dev/zvol/tank/ufs on /mnt/ufs (ufs, local, acls)

If I add that entry (/dev/zvol/tank/ufs) to /etc/fstab, it will try to 
mount as a critical filesystem on boot, however, because ZFS hasn't yet 
loaded, this fails and causes all sorts of fun for me.
Currently I have that filesystem mounting via a cronjob that checks 
every minute if it's mounted.. definitely not ideal.


I need this filesystem in /etc/fstab so I can setup quotas on it (if 
there is some other way to get quotas working, great, point me to a link 
or two).


So what I'm thinking for a solution is to delay the mount of this 
filesystem until ZFS has loaded, but I'm not sure of a way to do this 
with the filesystem in /etc/fstab, and without extensive hacking to one 
or more rc scripts.


Ideas?



Adding 'late' flag in Options section to the fstab entry may help,
although I don't think it will help with quotas:

# rcorder /etc/rc.d/*
[...]
/etc/rc.d/mountcritlocal
[...]
/etc/rc.d/zfs
[...]
/etc/rc.d/mountcritremote
[...]
/etc/rc.d/quota
[...]
/etc/rc.d/mountlate
[...]

We might consider running rc.d/quota after rc.d/mountlate, not sure if
it won't break something else. I added freebsd-rc@ to CC.

  


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA support custom v7.0 kernel

2008-05-29 Thread Alexander Motin

Colin Brace пишет:

I'd like to add a SATA drive to a P4 box that I use as a gateway/server.
The MB doesn't have a SATA interface, so I stuck an Initio-based SATA card
in the box. The kernel recognizes the card, but the attached drive wasn't
displayed when I started up sysinstall to format it. I'm wondering whether
I am missing SATA support. I commented out a bunch of stuff such as the
SCSI controllers when I compiled the kernel with ALTQ support, but these
options *are* included:
 
# SCSI peripherals

device  scbus  # SCSI bus (required for SCSI)
device  ch # SCSI media changers
device  da # Direct Access (disks)
device  sa # Sequential Access (tape etc)
device  cd # CD
device  pass   # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access)
device  ses# SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE)

Should this be enough? I don't see any specific references to SATA in the
handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html


Usually SATA is more ATA then SCSI. Try to add to your config:
device  ata
device  atadisk # ATA disk drives
device  ataraid # ATA RAID drives
device  atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
device  atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives
device  atapist # ATAPI tape drives

--
Alexander Motin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Patrick Baldwin

Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers.  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.

Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
new server.

Thanks,

--
Patrick Baldwin
Systems Administrator
Studsvik Scandpower, Inc.
1087 Beacon St.
Newton, MA 02459
1-617-965-7455
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread prad
On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:35:27 -0400
Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
 servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

i like postfix with dovecot. (we do imap for about half-a-dozen users.)
both are simple, understandable and easy to configure for virtual hosts.
(i found sendmail to be awkward and exim incomprehensible though i
possibly should have tried harder :D )

-- 
In friendship,
prad

  ... with you on your journey
Towards Freedom
http://www.towardsfreedom.com (website)
Information, Inspiration, Imagination - truly a site for soaring I's
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Eric Zimmerman

Patrick Baldwin wrote:

Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers.  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.

Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
new server.

Thanks,



I like postfix + dovecot.  Easy to set up and both have a ton of 
features. any relatively modern hardware will do with that kind of volume.


your aliases shouldnt be a problem either.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Patrick Baldwin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
 mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
 thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

 However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
 servers.  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
 servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

 I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
 users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.

 Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
 new server.


I like Exim + Dovecot with their flexibilities in configurations, security
and proven performance. Exim is so flexible and the configuration language
quite extensible you'll love it:-)
In terms of hardware, any decent workstation-grade hardware will do: For
example, I've managed to support over 200 users on an HP DC7800 with 4GB of
RAM. This same box runs Clamav and SpamAssassin both for filtering mmalware
and spam. It's a DB server, Web server, firewall/router.
Users do POP3 mostly but I surely believe with some good disks, IMAP should
not be such a problem with Dovecot.



-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!
--from a /. post
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA support custom v7.0 kernel

2008-05-29 Thread Colin Brace

On Thu, 29 May 2008 19:35:39 +0300, Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Usually SATA is more ATA then SCSI. Try to add to your config:
 deviceata
[...]

My kernel config has the ATA stuff already; the system currently boots from
an IDE drive. 


-- 
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread N.J. Thomas
* Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-29 13:35:27-0400]:
 I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers that
 would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

A third vote for Postfix + Dovecot here.

Thomas

-- 
N.J. Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:50 PM, N.J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 * Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-29
 13:35:27-0400]:
  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers that
  would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

 A third vote for Postfix + Dovecot here.


Votes may not count much, but the learning curve:-)
Now, if only if he can go start playing with Postfix, Exim and Dovecot - and
make a choice!


-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!
--from a /. post
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:

 Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
 mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
 thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

Given that, a FreeBSD system could be almost a drop-in replacement.
Sendmail should be the same or very nearly so (depends on the version
you are using now and the nre version).   Aliases should work just
the same. Your only differences might be in where some things
live.But, check out the hier(7) man page in FreeBSD.   It 
documents the FreeBSD directory conventions.

There are other MTAs and other utilities available to experiment with.
But, if you are comfortable with sendmail, there is no reason to change.
It is mature and very functional; does what you need.A modern
machine with FreeBSD 7.x should handle large numbers of Email users - 
even heavy users.

jerry


 
 However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
 servers.  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
 servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
 
 I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
 users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.
 
 Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
 new server.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 Patrick Baldwin
 Systems Administrator
 Studsvik Scandpower, Inc.
 1087 Beacon St.
 Newton, MA 02459
 1-617-965-7455
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:

  Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
  mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
  thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

 Given that, a FreeBSD system could be almost a drop-in replacement.
 Sendmail should be the same or very nearly so (depends on the version
 you are using now and the nre version).   Aliases should work just
 the same. Your only differences might be in where some things
 live.But, check out the hier(7) man page in FreeBSD.   It
 documents the FreeBSD directory conventions.

 There are other MTAs and other utilities available to experiment with.
 But, if you are comfortable with sendmail, there is no reason to change.
 It is mature and very functional; does what you need.A modern
 machine with FreeBSD 7.x should handle large numbers of Email users -
 even heavy users.

 jerry


The only perfect answer!
We should all clap for you for giving this answer.

-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!
--from a /. post
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu May 29 2008 00:39:06 Christian Zachariasen wrote:
 On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
 was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
 on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
 firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
 '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
 mozilla, firefox, a couple others.
 
 About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
 flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
 feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
 on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
 were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.
 
 Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
 it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
 it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
 things on a .php or .html page.
 
 Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
 what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
 other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
 learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
 my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
 editors in ports?
 
 I'd be much obliged for any help here.
 
 
 gary
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
   Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
 
 
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I say keep using the technique you're using now. That's what I'd do.
 Instead of finding a HTML Editor
 just find a simple text editor and write all your HTML in a clean manner.

 I don't know where Ted got his statistics from, but most people I know use
 simple text editors for writing their HTML, CSS
 and JavaScript. Personally I stick to vi or diakonos on BSD and Notepad2 on
 Windows.

/*
 * strange:: the way that mutt queues [ and orders ] its replies and theads is 
 * different from kmail.  I only use a GUI when there is a URL embedded, but
 * it must be down-queue.   
 */

I would *rather* use vi and HTML-by-hand.   And produce very simple, readable,  
uncluttered pages.  I don't use many graphics, e.g., I use the strength of 
HTML, php, blah ** 3.  

I'm ready to learn this CMS that Ted mentioned if I knew what it was!  And 
if its in ports.   AFAIK, the only pages that look bizarre are my 
initial www (and one other based on it).   I'll google around to find out 
what CMS is...   

 Christian Zachariasen
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:05:22PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:

 On Thu May 29 2008 00:39:06 Christian Zachariasen wrote:
  On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
  was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
  on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
  firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
  '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
  mozilla, firefox, a couple others.
  
  About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
  flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
  feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
  on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
  were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.
  
  Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
  it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
  it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
  things on a .php or .html page.
  
  Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
  what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
  other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
  learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
  my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
  editors in ports?
  
  I'd be much obliged for any help here.
  
  gary
  
   --
Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
  http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
  
   ___
   freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
   http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
   To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  I say keep using the technique you're using now. That's what I'd do.
  Instead of finding a HTML Editor
  just find a simple text editor and write all your HTML in a clean manner.
 
  I don't know where Ted got his statistics from, but most people I know use
  simple text editors for writing their HTML, CSS
  and JavaScript. Personally I stick to vi or diakonos on BSD and Notepad2 on
  Windows.
 
 /*
  * strange:: the way that mutt queues [ and orders ] its replies and theads 
 is 
  * different from kmail.  I only use a GUI when there is a URL embedded, but
  * it must be down-queue.   
  */
 
 I would *rather* use vi and HTML-by-hand.   And produce very simple, 
 readable,  
 uncluttered pages.  I don't use many graphics, e.g., I use the strength of 
 HTML, php, blah ** 3.  
 
 I'm ready to learn this CMS that Ted mentioned if I knew what it was!  And 
 if its in ports.   AFAIK, the only pages that look bizarre are my 
 initial www (and one other based on it).   I'll google around to find out 
 what CMS is...   

We are initial buried.   CMS can mean many things, but in this
case it probably mean either Content Management System or 
possibly Change Management System.   Both are common uses.

If you are happy editing your HTML files and doing your own CSS,
then you don't need it at all.

That web verification site might be an interesting thing to
try now and then, though.
jerry


 
  Christian Zachariasen
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -- 
 Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread DAve

Gary Kline wrote:

On Thu May 29 2008 00:39:06 Christian Zachariasen wrote:

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
   was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
   on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
   firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
   '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
   mozilla, firefox, a couple others.

   About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
   flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
   feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
   on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
   were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.

   Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
   it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
   it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
   things on a .php or .html page.

   Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
   what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
   other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
   learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
   my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
   editors in ports?

   I'd be much obliged for any help here.


I say keep using the technique you're using now. That's what I'd do.
Instead of finding a HTML Editor
just find a simple text editor and write all your HTML in a clean manner.

I don't know where Ted got his statistics from, but most people I know use
simple text editors for writing their HTML, CSS
and JavaScript. Personally I stick to vi or diakonos on BSD and Notepad2 on
Windows.


/*
 * strange:: the way that mutt queues [ and orders ] its replies and theads is 
 * different from kmail.  I only use a GUI when there is a URL embedded, but

 * it must be down-queue.   
 */

I would *rather* use vi and HTML-by-hand.   And produce very simple, readable,  
uncluttered pages.  I don't use many graphics, e.g., I use the strength of 
HTML, php, blah ** 3.  

I'm ready to learn this CMS that Ted mentioned if I knew what it was!  And 
if its in ports.   AFAIK, the only pages that look bizarre are my 
initial www (and one other based on it).   I'll google around to find out 
what CMS is...   


I still prefer html by hand. I use VIM though all our designers and 
developers use Dreamweaver, funny few if any can fix the HTML if the 
tool munges it. Many have no idea how HTML works.


As far as CMS tools go some create nice pages but at a cost. We have 
several clients who insist on CMS tools. The joke around our Office is 
[Joomla|Rails|other] is the only tool known to man to require 1GB server 
memory to load all the required libs in displaying Hello World. Some 
of the CMS tools are very very heavy. Straight static HTML can be 
blisteringly fast in comparison unless you have low traffic or a fairly 
hefty server. Static HTML also doesn't show up in my CERT emails every 
month with security issues.


My 2 cents worth...

DAve

--
In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years
of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with
rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel
that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu May 29 2008 08:46:29 David Kelly wrote:
 On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:57:35PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
  Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
  was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
  on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
  firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
  '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
  mozilla, firefox, a couple others.

 Others have suggested online validators. /usr/ports/www/tidy is another
 that can check your code, even attempt repairs. Can also be used to
 standardize the coding format much like GNU indent for C code. Comes
 built-in to BBEdit on Mac where I do most of my HTML authoring.

 Eyeballing your code the first thing that stood out was:

 BACKGROUND=/usr/local/www/data/Graphics/paper0.jpg

 Don't think that will work for anyone other than yourself, and only when
 you are on the server itself. Unless one has a file with that exact same
 name and path.

Good one, thankee.  Using the bg graphic works on my jottings pages because I 
gave a relative ./Graphics/foo.jpg pointer.  Just checking now with Opera, 
I still see the www page askew.  Blue-bar with most strings embedded within 
it.  firefox [ and mozilla ] get it the way I want, opera and konq, nope.

tidy?  Sorry, must snce i've been wworking on other things, i've lost touch.




-- 
Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: External USB disk won't mount

2008-05-29 Thread Mark Ovens

Bob McConnell wrote:

From: Mark Ovens


If anyone can tell me how to debug this to try to get to the cause so
a 

fix can be found then I'm happy to spend the time doing so.


Unless you are already familiar with the drivers and the bus itself, or
want to learn more about it than anyone should ever need to know, it is
not likely to be a productive use of your time.


Hehe, yes, I kind of guessed the answer would be something like that.

Oh well, never mind. I bought it off FleaBay and it did say Windows/Mac 
but I figured something as basic as a ATA-USB bridge should be OS 
agnostic - to be fair it is, as it sees the disk and creates devices for 
it, it's just that the USB interface is not standards-compliant.


I fired up the Mandriva Linux Live CD and tried it. Linux found the 
disk, created devices for it - then did a USB reset and the devices 
disappeared.


Might have a word at work and see if they'll swap it with the one I 
borrowed that does work.


Thanks for your help guys.

Regards,

Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu May 29 2008 13:26:43 DAve wrote:
 Gary Kline wrote:
  On Thu May 29 2008 00:39:06 Christian Zachariasen wrote:
  On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
 was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
 on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
 firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
 '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
 mozilla, firefox, a couple others.
 
 About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
 flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
 feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
 on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
 were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.
 
 Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
 it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
 it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
 things on a .php or .html page.
 
 Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
 what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
 other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
 learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design
  for my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
  editors in ports?
 
 I'd be much obliged for any help here.
 
  I say keep using the technique you're using now. That's what I'd do.
  Instead of finding a HTML Editor
  just find a simple text editor and write all your HTML in a clean
  manner.
 
  I don't know where Ted got his statistics from, but most people I know
  use simple text editors for writing their HTML, CSS
  and JavaScript. Personally I stick to vi or diakonos on BSD and Notepad2
  on Windows.
 
  /*
   * strange:: the way that mutt queues [ and orders ] its replies and
  theads is * different from kmail.  I only use a GUI when there is a URL
  embedded, but * it must be down-queue.   
   */
 
  I would *rather* use vi and HTML-by-hand.   And produce very simple,
  readable, uncluttered pages.  I don't use many graphics, e.g., I use the
  strength of HTML, php, blah ** 3.
 
  I'm ready to learn this CMS that Ted mentioned if I knew what it was! 
  And if its in ports.   AFAIK, the only pages that look bizarre are my
  initial www (and one other based on it).   I'll google around to find
  out what CMS is...

 I still prefer html by hand. I use VIM though all our designers and
 developers use Dreamweaver, funny few if any can fix the HTML if the
 tool munges it. Many have no idea how HTML works.

 As far as CMS tools go some create nice pages but at a cost. We have
 several clients who insist on CMS tools. The joke around our Office is
 [Joomla|Rails|other] is the only tool known to man to require 1GB server
 memory to load all the required libs in displaying Hello World. Some
 of the CMS tools are very very heavy. Straight static HTML can be
 blisteringly fast in comparison unless you have low traffic or a fairly
 hefty server. Static HTML also doesn't show up in my CERT emails every
 month with security issues.

 My 2 cents worth...

well, for years my favored method is kiss == keep it simple, sir.
i'm still chiuckling over that tool that requires a GIG to load.  


gary

ps: thanks to Google: CMS == content mgnt system




 DAve



-- 
Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pkg_create v make package

2008-05-29 Thread Chris Whitehouse

Hi

What's the difference between packages made by these two methods?

Eg I have youtube_dl installed. From within the youtube_dl port directory

# make package-recursive

resulted in
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  8389 29 May 21:14 
/usr/ports/packages/All/youtube_dl-2008.04.20.tbz


whereas from within my home directory

% pkg_create -Rb youtube_dl-2008.04.20

resulted in
-rw-r--r--  1 chrisw  chrisw  8281 29 May 21:22 youtube_dl-2008.04.20.tbz

similarly there is a size difference for the one or two dependency 
packages I checked that were created at the same time.


make package in the ports directory insists on compiling and installing 
 the port and seems to do a lot of other things like registering 
dependencies and creating symlinks in /usr/ports/packages/ whereas 
pkg_create just creates the package tarball (and dependencies).


I would prefer to use pkg_create to avoid recompiling everything but I 
would like to know that installing a pkg_create package with pkg_add 
will properly install all the dependencies as well.


Thanks

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best way of upgrading postgresql in production?

2008-05-29 Thread Shelby Cain
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 18:31 +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote:
 Ok, you're probably right, I just haven't worked with jails before and 
 have just read the wrong articles. I will investigate how I could 
 install the newer version in a jail and keep both running at the same 
 time during the upgrade, I'll probably run into more problems along the 
 way but will post again if I'm stuck.
 

I recently set up something very similar.  I used the following as a
guide web page as a gudie for getting a different version of Postgresql
running in a jail when the host is already running a different version
of Postgresql.

http://www.freebsddiary.org/jail-multiple.php


HTH,

Shelby Cain


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Best way of upgrading postgresql in production?

2008-05-29 Thread Shelby Cain
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:00 -0500, Shelby Cain wrote:
 guide web page as a gudie for getting a different version of Postgresql
 running in a jail when the host is already running a different version
 of Postgresql.

This is what happens when you don't hit the wrong button in your mail
client.  :-/

That sentence should have read I used the following web page as a guide
for getting a different version of Postgresql running in jail...

Regards,

Shelby Cain


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:52:22PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:

 On Thu May 29 2008 13:26:43 DAve wrote:

 ...

  memory to load all the required libs in displaying Hello World. Some
  of the CMS tools are very very heavy. Straight static HTML can be
  blisteringly fast in comparison unless you have low traffic or a fairly
  hefty server. Static HTML also doesn't show up in my CERT emails every
  month with security issues.
 
  My 2 cents worth...
 
 well, for years my favored method is kiss == keep it simple, sir.

Oh, you are polite.   I am used to other interpretations
for that second 's' ...

 i'm still chiuckling over that tool that requires a GIG to load.  
 
 gary
 
 ps: thanks to Google: CMS == content mgnt system
 

Yup.That is one of the more common.

jerry

 
 
 
  DAve
 
 -- 
 Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site?

2008-05-29 Thread Chris Whitehouse

Kurt Buff wrote:

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Kurt Buff wrote:

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:



http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/

Chris

If you want to use some/many/most of the core utils on Windows, you'll
be much better off with http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net

unxutils seems pretty moribund, and I have not been successful
downloading the updates from that site for a while.

Kurt

I'll have a look at these, thanks for the suggestion. I have to say though
the unxutils commands that I have used work perfectly well despite their
age, don't require cygwin and don't do silly registry things on windows. I
need this as I'm using them on a work computer which I am not allowed to
install software on :P

Chris


The unxutils work well, but the gnuwin32 stuff is a bit more current,
and more complete. They don't require any registry fiddling nor extra
DLLs, either, just like the unxutils stuff. I stick them in a
directory, and set my path up with that. Works well for me, anyway.


HTH,

Kurt



Cool! I will definitely check these out, thanks.

(Sorry list, OT)

Chris

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline


FWIW, I'Ve switch back to mutt.  i can't live without vi


On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:30:05AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
 
 Don't bother, Gary.
 
   The world is moving towards CMS systems for hosting websites.

do we have such a mngnmt system tool in ports??



 
   The ultra-cheapo people use godaddy's site builder and
 put crap on a crappy-looking interface.


HMmmm.   it's ben my experience that if you keep a page 
*simple*,  that serves best.   now i'm not talking about 
Sam's New and Used Dildos and Computers that's got animations 
screaming at you.   With 50 text and graphic ads/page plus 
flashing text.  i'm talking about something more together.
low-impact AND inventive.   i've learned that if the 
content sux, all the bells and whistles won't help.  


 
   The better hosting companies each have their own site builders
 and look better, and are populated by acres of garden-variety corporate
 and the occassional personal sites.
 
   Very, very few people custom-write sites in HTML anymore.
 Most people use sitebuilding software (frontpage was the original,
 it's deprecated now in favor of other newer tools) either running
 on their PC or on the server.
 
   black text on blue is terribly hard to read for most people,
 read up on how the human eye works to understand why.


the why is simple, reduced contrast; that's why i have black text
on a white bg.  Or so i thought until i saw how konquorer 
(and opera) were munging my homepage.   

firefox displays a graphic [link] with a stylized J; it is not 
displayed by the other 2.  that might be where to start looking.






 
   Put your time into loading a CMS system on your server then
 create your site in it.  Yes the learning curve is steep in
 the beginning but it's not rote memorization of HTML tags.  It
 is understanding how all the things work together.


you probably didn't start with the earlier markup.  back then,
'93-4, there was BR,P, B, and EM.   i wrote a 2.2K-line 
program to handle hi - ``hi'' and a couple other things.
the code has evolved, of course, but still works.

looks like what i need NOW is a debugger, :-)   i have virtually
zero design skills  except keep it simple

gary


 
 Ted
 
[[ save the electrons ]]

  

-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:38:05AM -0700, Kevin Downey wrote:
 On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


[[ ... ]]

 Konq uses more or less the same rendering engine as Safari.


interesting. where is this browser in ports.  locate doesnt 
find it. 

tx for the datapoint.


 
 http://iamvoodoochile.redgrapellc.com/uploaded_images/1985-741912.jpg
 -- break down of modern webdesign
 
 -- 
 The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of
 personal relationships.
  Fisheye

-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Frank Shute
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:05:22PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:

 On Thu May 29 2008 00:39:06 Christian Zachariasen wrote:
 
  On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
  was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
  on the deep-blue bg on my RHS.  I stopped and checked with
  firefox; things looked fine.  I've done all markup by hand since
  '94, very carefully, with only browsers in the ports tree--
  mozilla, firefox, a couple others.
  
  About a week ago I viewed my homepage with KDE Konq and almost
  flipped out.  One free commercial historical calender event
  feature was glued to the bottom of my blue bar (TABLE/TABLE)
  on the RHS of the page.   And yep, the new text and other things
  were centered in the middle of the long blue rectangle.
  
  Since I have a few weeks now to work on things beside research,
  it's time to update my main web page.   My friend was using IE;
  it may be that Konqueror uses a similar parser to position
  things on a .php or .html page.
  
  Other than beginning from Zero and trying to determine exactly
  what causes firefox and konq to diverge, do any of you have any
  other ideas?  I've never learned an HTML editors because of the
  learning curve.  But:: if/when I come up with a better design for
  my home page, I'm willing to try again:: any best (simple) HTML
  editors in ports?
  
  I'd be much obliged for any help here.
  
  
 
  I say keep using the technique you're using now. That's what I'd
  do.  Instead of finding a HTML Editor just find a simple text
  editor and write all your HTML in a clean manner.
 
  I don't know where Ted got his statistics from, but most people I
  know use simple text editors for writing their HTML, CSS and
  JavaScript. Personally I stick to vi or diakonos on BSD and
  Notepad2 on Windows.
  

 /*
  * strange:: the way that mutt queues [ and orders ] its replies and theads 
 is 
  * different from kmail.  I only use a GUI when there is a URL embedded, but
  * it must be down-queue.   
  */

Use textproc/urlview with mutt  Firefox.

 

 I would *rather* use vi and HTML-by-hand.   And produce very simple,
 readable,  uncluttered pages.  I don't use many graphics, e.g., I
 use the strength of HTML, php, blah ** 3.  
 
 I'm ready to learn this CMS that Ted mentioned if I knew what it
 was!  And if its in ports.   AFAIK, the only pages that look bizarre
 are my initial www (and one other based on it).   I'll google
 around to find out what CMS is...


Since you're a do it by hand person, I'll give you the benefit of my
experiences doing my pages that way.

My site is on a similar scale to yours and I've just kept it simple
except where I've used server-side (PHP/Perl) and Javascript.

1.

Use Firefox to develop with and install the webdeveloper plug-in:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60

Use vim not vi, since you get syntax highlighting with vim/gvim.

Add x11/rgb to your system and:

$ showrgb | less 

will show you the websafe colours. Plug in the numbers to your
stylesheet to get your preferred colours. You can view the colours
with e.g:

$ xterm -bg steelblue

Or:

http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_colornames.asp

I use Gimp for any graphics.

2.

Choose a standard that you are going to code to and validate against.
I use XHTML1.0 Transitional and CSS. Things are going more XML than
HTML and transitional is less restrictive than strict.

3.

Have a look at w3c schools site to learn your chosen language:

http://www.w3schools.com/

There are various tutorials and references there. Best site on the
'net!

4.

Steal a simple page that validates:

http://www.shute.org.uk/miscellany.html

and use it as a template to hack on. Steal the style sheet too.

Validate your webpage as you go along with the w3c validator.

5.

A few tips:

Use div's for layout, not tables.

Don't use fixed text heights, use relative so it respects the users
preferences for text size.

Keep an eye out for pages that look nice and validate. View source 
then steal chunks of xhtml and css. 

6.

Happy hacking!


You'll find that your validated pages will show fine in most modern
browsers although some have more quirks than others. But when you get
somebody say Your webpage doesn't look right in Internet Exploder 5
you can say to them Get a proper browser that respects web
standards!

Regards,


-- 

 Frank 


 Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 05:00:57AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Kevin Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Let be the first of many to say, please do not top post.
 
 Let me be the first to say please don't quote the entire posting
 and the entire response.
 
  In a recent interview it was revealed that the New York Times does a
  lot of by hand html writing because it just gets you better html.
 
 Of course it does.  And I would expect a really professional
 site to do so.  But, your not paying attention to what he is
 saying:
 
 ... trying to determine exactly what causes firefox and konq to diverge...
 
 An html author who writes by hand MUST know about ALL browser 
 idiosyncracies.  The OP does not want to know this or he would
 have TESTED with all browsers years ago.  And the context indicates
 he really doesen't want to know.



Chill down a bit, okay?  first, (as the OP), i did not know
thaat there was *this** great a disparity in thee rendering
between classes of browsers.  i used to stick pretty close 
to the w3.org (or whatever it was).   i didn't think the
difference extended to how the TABLE stuff was parsed.

BZZZT.  letsee, that 25 trillion for Life, 3 for gary.

.

 

--the OP


-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Bob Johnson
On 5/29/08, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
   was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
[...]
   I'd be much obliged for any help here.



Konqueror says that the comment that reads

!-- click on Graphic to goto jottings.thought.org --!

isn't closed until the end of the next comment way down the page, so
it is ignoring all the code in between. I think that's your problem
(there is a typo in the close of the comment). In other words,
Konqueror seems to be displaying the page correctly. The other
browsers are probably (incorrectly) treating end-of-line as
end-of-comment.

When you View Document Source in Konqueror, it highlights the markup
to make it easier to spot such problems, and comments stand out pretty
distinctly. In fact, it appears there are a few other places with that
same typo (closing a comment with --!).

- Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pkg_create v make package

2008-05-29 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Thu, 29 May 2008 22:06:22 +0100, Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi

 What's the difference between packages made by these two methods?

 Eg I have youtube_dl installed. From within the youtube_dl port directory

 # make package-recursive

 resulted in
 -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  8389 29 May 21:14 
 /usr/ports/packages/All/youtube_dl-2008.04.20.tbz

 whereas from within my home directory

 % pkg_create -Rb youtube_dl-2008.04.20

 resulted in
 -rw-r--r--  1 chrisw  chrisw  8281 29 May 21:22 youtube_dl-2008.04.20.tbz

Packages are just 'tarballs with extra stuff'.  You can extract the
two tarballs and use `diff -r' to see where they differ :)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Thu, 29 May 2008 15:52:21 -0400, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
 Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
 mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
 thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

 I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
 users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.

 Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
 new server.

 Given that, a FreeBSD system could be almost a drop-in replacement.
 Sendmail should be the same or very nearly so (depends on the version
 you are using now and the nre version).

Nice finger-slip in 'new/nre' :)

I fully agree that FreeBSD+Sendmail should be an almost drop-in
replacement for Solaris+Sendmail.

 Aliases should work just the same.  Your only differences might be in
 where some things live.  But, check out the hier(7) man page in
 FreeBSD.  It documents the FreeBSD directory conventions.

Patrick, Jerry is right.  If you are comfortable with Sendmail on
Solaris, you should be pretty ok with the base system version of the
same on FreeBSD too.

Moving the aliases is probably just a matter of copying over the aliases
from Solaris to `/etc/mail/aliases' and running `newaliases'.  That's all.

 There are other MTAs and other utilities available to experiment with.
 But, if you are comfortable with sendmail, there is no reason to
 change.  It is mature and very functional; does what you need.  A
 modern machine with FreeBSD 7.x should handle large numbers of Email
 users - even heavy users.

An old Intel Pentium at 400 MHz handles the email traffic of all local
users (several dozen) and many mailing lists, in one of the domains I am
affiliated with.  It also runs MailScanner and spamassassin. Relatively
modern systems can go a very long way :)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread David Duong

Patrick Baldwin wrote:

Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers.  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.

Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
new server.

Thanks,



I also suggest Postfix + dovecot.  Great combination :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Sahil Tandon
Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
 mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
 thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.

FreeBSD == good choice. :)
  
 However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
 servers.  I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
 servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.

 I've only got about two dozen users, though they are all very heavy
 users of email.  I'm using IMAP, and I'd like to continue to do so.
 
That's a small user base, so you don't need to invest much in hardware.  
For the server, I highly recommend Postfix.

 Finally, we have quite a few aliases I'd want to port over to a
 new server.
   
That should be fairly straightforward; for hints, see the mailing list 
archive for your MTA, or ask them the question.

-- 
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread cpghost
On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:50:53 -0700
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The world is moving towards CMS systems for hosting websites.
 
   do we have such a mngnmt system tool in ports??

How about Plone or other Zope-based apps? Plone is in ports:
  /usr/ports/www/plone3
as is Silva:
  /usr/ports/www/zope-silva

But be forewarned: both are resource hogs and need a reasonable
fast server to run smoothly if you've got a lot of traffic;
and finding a good Zope-provider may prove a little more difficult
than the usual LAMP-based el-cheapo web hosting accounts...

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-29 Thread Doug Hardie


On May 29, 2008, at 16:55, Sahil Tandon wrote:


Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now.  It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.


I am currently using a 2U server from abmx.com for my mail server.  It  
has a quad processor in it and it runs sendmail, dspam, tmda, clamav,  
and some local stuff in addition to a number of other functions not  
related to mail.  It was cheaper than the equivalent DELL servers and  
it appears to be all top of the line components.  It serves several  
thousand users, many of which receive a lot of mail (I suspect much of  
it is spam).  load averages:  0.17,  0.43,  0.35.  Those are typical.   
You may not need that much horsepower, by my servers are quite a way  
from me and there is no one there most of the time. 
 
___

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD based router ...

2008-05-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Ability to route several C-class networks through multiple incoming fiber 
connections using BGP4, including VLAN support ... we're trying to keep the DC 
as 'FreeBSD centric' as we can, which is why the interest in someone like 
Juniper vs going with Cisco ...



- --On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 09:55:07 +0200 Wojciech Puchar 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off of
 FreeBSD?

 define what enterprise level router is


 - --
 Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
 Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MSN . [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

 iEYEARECAAYFAkg8u+cACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMF8wCg25K5IaX4/DIHk8KFIAfKXe/b
 decAoOqllLM7c6ty7wwXcwuPlEk/xSo6
 =O+GR
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





- -- 
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkg/WWEACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvONuACgwwegEBBMKq0oXsySdz4cjSX/
V5IAoJXia1wjfxgFgztnJ8WRTQzv/B8l
=ZBFL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:05:36PM +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
 On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:05:22PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
 

[[ ... ]]

 
  /*
   * strange:: the way that mutt queues [ and orders ] its replies and 
  threads is 
   * different from kmail.  I only use a GUI when there is a URL embedded, but
   * it must be down-queue.   
   */
 
 Use textproc/urlview with mutt  Firefox.


Frank, can you do me a favor and mail your ~/.urlview, please?
I installed this program a few years ago, but it only worked 
with lynx. I just found the url_handler.sh script so now have a
clue but if your ~/.urlview points to firefox you'll save me
some typing.   --Also [going further OT], I like Konsole even
better than xterm.--

 
  
 
  I would *rather* use vi and HTML-by-hand.   And produce very simple,
  readable,  uncluttered pages.  I don't use many graphics, e.g., I
  use the strength of HTML, php, blah ** 3.  
  
 
 
 Since you're a do it by hand person, I'll give you the benefit of my
 experiences doing my pages that way.
 
 My site is on a similar scale to yours and I've just kept it simple
 except where I've used server-side (PHP/Perl) and Javascript.


Sounds like what I've done, more/less.  My index file in 
www/data is PHP.  php keeps getting closer to C,  c; I've
written a few things in php.


 
 1.
 
 Use Firefox to develop with and install the webdeveloper plug-in:
 
 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60
 
 Use vim not vi, since you get syntax highlighting with vim/gvim.


Mm, I'm familiar with vim; like it all right, but lost my 
~/.vimrc file (and my backup).  NP in this case.  vim does 
a solid job of highlighting.  

 
 Add x11/rgb to your system and:
 
 $ showrgb | less 
 
 will show you the websafe colours. Plug in the numbers to your
 stylesheet to get your preferred colours. You can view the colours
 with e.g:
 
 $ xterm -bg steelblue
 
 Or:
 
 http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_colornames.asp


Have the rgb app; when I began building my jottings pages I knew
the colors would set the philosophic/meditative mood, so in early
'02 I ripped off the light blue from the philosophy pages at
Lampeter.   Then used various color wheels to choose the other
colors.  This is about the outer limits of my design
capabilities, :-)


 
 I use Gimp for any graphics.


Impressive.  Anything at the level of The GIMP is beyond me.

 
 2.
 
 Choose a standard that you are going to code to and validate against.
 I use XHTML1.0 Transitional and CSS. Things are going more XML than
 HTML and transitional is less restrictive than strict.
 

Here is where it may be best to take this offlist.  I'm guessing
that XHTML is extended-HTML.  Yes/no?  = 10 years ago I
created some short stories andor essays using the Sytle Sheets.
But as you point out, XML is prob'ly the future of markup and I
know next to nothing about it.  

For example, given firstNameJohn/firstName, *where/what*
defines the tag?  Since the WWW bunch has given XML the nod, it
is both the present and future of a lot of the web.   ---So,
are there any books for Beginners you recommend?  You or anyone
else onlist who has waded thru this plea!


 3.
 
 Have a look at w3c schools site to learn your chosen language:
 
 http://www.w3schools.com/
 
 There are various tutorials and references there. Best site on the
 'net!
 

hMMM:-) Maybe I should've read ahead .


 4.
 
 Steal a simple page that validates:
 
 http://www.shute.org.uk/miscellany.html
 
 and use it as a template to hack on. Steal the style sheet too.
 
 Validate your webpage as you go along with the w3c validator.

Should I just google for the validator?  At any rate, thanks much
for the   two URL's above.  The more I can learn on my own
(without bothering anyone else), the better.


 
 5.
 
 A few tips:
 
 Use div's for layout, not tables.


i cannot // hhaven't made sense of DIV since I first saw it.
*This* may be where I've confused IE and Konq and it might be the
easiest way to create the layout that firefox gives me.

As I see it, ttables let you put rectangles anywhere; then you
can putt other things inside; how to do this with DIV is one
more black hole.



 
 Don't use fixed text heights, use relative so it respects the users
 preferences for text size.


I didn't understand you could hardwire a textsize; maybe I've
done it inadvertently ... 



 
 Keep an eye out for pages that look nice and validate. View source 
 then steal chunks of xhtml and css. 
 

I still have unread messages down-queue, but may as well ask if
there are any HTML/XML checkers in ports that would help validate
my mark.  David Kelly suggested 

Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
 On 5/29/08, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Several weeks ago a friend asked why my www.thought.org page
  was so hard to read.  She said that part of my text was black
 [...]
  I'd be much obliged for any help here.
 
 
 
 Konqueror says that the comment that reads
 
 !-- click on Graphic to goto jottings.thought.org --!
 
 isn't closed until the end of the next comment way down the page, so
 it is ignoring all the code in between. I think that's your problem
 (there is a typo in the close of the comment). In other words,
 Konqueror seems to be displaying the page correctly. The other
 browsers are probably (incorrectly) treating end-of-line as
 end-of-comment.
 
 When you View Document Source in Konqueror, it highlights the markup
 to make it easier to spot such problems, and comments stand out pretty
 distinctly. In fact, it appears there are a few other places with that
 same typo (closing a comment with --!).
 


yes!  it looks like you are right on the money! next time you
are in seattle, i'll buy you a beer.

(also, this may explain why sometimes my comments bombbed during 
testing.  i thought ! .. ! was *legal*.  *mumble::censored*)

thank you * 1000,

gary


 - Bob

-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


service (torque) not starting at boot time on 7.0

2008-05-29 Thread joe park
Hello,

I've searched the mailing list, but it didn't help the issue I'm seeing.  I did 
fresh install of 7.0, downloaded latest ports.tar.gz, and installed torque 
(portable batch system) from ports.  Everything works fine once the deamon is 
running, but the services (namely, pbs_mom, pbs_server, and pbs_sched) are not 
started automatically when the system boots.  I can manually start them without 
a problem with 

/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_mom start
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_server start
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_sched start

The /etc/rc.conf file correctly has following entries :

pbs_mom_enable=YES
pbs_server_enable=YES
pbs_sched_enable=YES

When I added rc_debug=YES, I see that it's not processing any of pbs related 
process.

I tried adding .sh extension to the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_* scripts, chmod 
755 on them (it's 555 by default), getting rid of all other entries in 
/etc/rc.conf except pbs entries, etc, but I cannot get them to start.  Any 
ideas?  I appended full content of /etc/rc.conf.

Thanks,

Joe


# Created: Thu May 22 09:25:54 2008
# Enable network daemons for user convenience.
# Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf.
# This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf.
ifconfig_bge0=inet 192.168.3.97  netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.3.2
hostname=node001.xxx.com
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES
pbs_mom_enable=YES
pbs_server_enable=YES
pbs_sched_enable=YES
rc_debug=YES
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: service (torque) not starting at boot time on 7.0

2008-05-29 Thread Sahil Tandon
joe park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've searched the mailing list, but it didn't help the issue I'm seeing. I 
 did fresh install of 7.0, downloaded latest ports.tar.gz, and installed 
 torque (portable batch system) from ports.  Everything works fine once the 
 deamon is running, but the services (namely, pbs_mom, pbs_server, and 
 pbs_sched) are not started automatically when the system boots.  I can 
 manually start them without a problem with 
 
 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_mom start
 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_server start
 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_sched start
 
 The /etc/rc.conf file correctly has following entries :
 
 pbs_mom_enable=YES
 pbs_server_enable=YES
 pbs_sched_enable=YES
 
 When I added rc_debug=YES, I see that it's not processing any of pbs 
 related process.

I cannot reproduce this problem on a fresh install of 7.0 with the latest 
version of torque.  Do you see any clues in /var/log/messages?  On my system, 
with rc_debug=YES in /etc/rc.conf (with some truncation to allow for 
wrapping):

% awk '/DEBUG/  /pbs/  /check/' /var/log/messages
beast root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: pbs_server_enable is set to YES.
beast root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: pbs_sched_enable is set to YES.
beast root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: pbs_mom_enable is set to YES.
  
The pbs_* lines are processed at boot. 

-- 
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: service (torque) not starting at boot time on 7.0

2008-05-29 Thread joe park
Thanks for a reply.  I'm pretty stumped why it's not starting.  I feel like I'm 
missing something very obvious...

There is nothing in messages with pbs

# awk '/DEBUG/  /pbs/  /check/' /var/log/messages
#

When start it manually, then pbs logs it at messages

# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_mom start
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_mom: DEBUG: checkyesno: pbs_mom_enable is set to 
YES.
Starting pbs_mom.
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pbs_mom: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: 
/usr/local/sbin/pbs_mom

Following is debug msg from /var/log/messages

# awk '/DEBUG/  /check/' /var/log/messages
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: 
hostapd_enable is set to NO.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: inetd_enable 
is set to NO.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: mixer_enable 
is set to YES.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: jail_enable 
is set to NO.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: cron_dst is 
set to YES.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: cron_enable 
is set to YES.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: 
auditd_enable is set to NO.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: 
nfs_client_enable is set to NO.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: named_enable 
is set to NO.
May 29 20:42:09 node001 root: /etc/rc.shutdown: DEBUG: checkyesno: ipfs_enable 
is set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: ldconfig_insecure is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: ibcs2_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: sysvipc_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: linux_enable is set 
to YES.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: svr4_enable is set to 
NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: named_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: ntpdate_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: rpcbind_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nis_server_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nis_ypxfrd_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: rpc_ypupdated_enable 
is set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nis_client_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nis_ypset_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nis_yppasswdd_enable 
is set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: accounting_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nfs_client_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: amd_enable is set to 
NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: atm_enable is set to 
NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: auditd_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: clear_tmp_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: clear_tmp_X is set to 
YES.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: clear_tmp_X is set to 
YES.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: dmesg_enable is set 
to YES.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: ipxrouted_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: 
kerberos5_server_enable is set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: 
kadmind5_server_enable is set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: keyserv_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: 
kpasswdd_server_enable is set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: enable_quotas is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nfs_server_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: mountd_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: nfs_server_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: rpc_statd_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: rpc_lockd_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: pppoed_enable is set 
to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: 
pwcheck_start
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: virecover_enable is 
set to YES.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: watchdogd_enable is 
set to NO.
May 29 20:43:40 node001 root: /etc/rc: DEBUG: checkyesno: 

RE: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Kline
 Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:51 PM
 To: Ted Mittelstaedt
 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
 Subject: Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.
 
 
   you probably didn't start with the earlier markup.  back then,
   '93-4, there was BR,P, B, and EM.   i wrote a 2.2K-line 
   program to handle hi - ``hi'' and a couple other things.
   the code has evolved, of course, but still works.
 

Not the case.  I use vi myself and I eschew background gifs and
such.  Web pages that I create are black text on a white back
ground interspersed with images when needed.  Period.  No CSS no frames, no
nothing.  If the content I put up isn't worth reading
then no amount of formatting, font specification, animated
images, and so forth is going to get people to look at it,
is my feeling.

Looking at your site, it's clear your not a true minimalist.
Thus, my recommendation to not even try.  Web page design has
got so complex that you basically have to do it full time to
made a page that looks professional.  If your going to create
pages, then a true minimalist page is just as functional and
just as good as an amateur attempt.  Meaning, both it and the
amateur page will look like crap, but people aren't there for
the looks they are there for the information, and they won't care.

Naturally, I am perfectly aware too many people assume that if
the page is unformatted that the content must be crap.  So, for
commercial sites that I am involved in that a lot of eyeballs
look at, I don't code those.  I have my wife code them - who IS
an HTML designer.  Watching her work I can see how much work
is involved in making a page look professional.  (she uses homesite,
which is a commercial html editor, it is not a wysiwyg like
dreamweaver)  I know that if I just do the usual job
that an amateur does, it's like a little kid riding a plastic
horse at the grocery store and pretending he's a cowboy.

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: Gary Kline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:14 PM
 To: Ted Mittelstaedt
 Cc: Kevin Downey; FreeBSD Mailing List
 Subject: Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.
 
 
 
   Chill down a bit, okay?  first, (as the OP), i did not know
   thaat there was *this** great a disparity in thee rendering
   between classes of browsers.  i used to stick pretty close 
   to the w3.org (or whatever it was).   i didn't think the
   difference extended to how the TABLE stuff was parsed.
 

Gary, the problem is that the majority of people out there use
IE, most IE7, but still a lot of IE6, and a few deihards IE5.

Then there are the older versions of Safari on the Mac - there's
still a lot of Mac's around that are running 10.2 believe it or
not, and those came with MS IE for the Mac which -really- munges
some pages.  And Safari for Windows - which is a bit different than
Safari on the Mac.

And then there are all the Unix browsers.

There are some test programs that can help.  But the validators
can tell you your code is right and it still will display differently
in some of the browsers.  The only way to do it is to do what
the pros do - which is have all the different systems available
and load their pages in those browsers.

Telling people my site is fine your browser is fucked, get a
better one is the mark of an amateur who is also being extremely
presumptive.  It's the old do it my way or fuck off

This is what Microsoft tells people - and most FreeBSDers and
Linux people claim they are on the moral high ground because they
aren't forcing their stuff down people's throats - that is, 
until they create a webpage and then they have no problem forcing
software down people's throats to see it, I guess

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.

2008-05-29 Thread DAve

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Kline
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:51 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
Subject: Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT.


you probably didn't start with the earlier markup.  back then,
	'93-4, there was BR,P, B, and EM.   i wrote a 2.2K-line 
	program to handle hi - ``hi'' and a couple other things.

the code has evolved, of course, but still works.



Not the case.  I use vi myself and I eschew background gifs and
such.  Web pages that I create are black text on a white back
ground interspersed with images when needed.  Period.  No CSS no frames, no
nothing.  If the content I put up isn't worth reading
then no amount of formatting, font specification, animated
images, and so forth is going to get people to look at it,
is my feeling.


I nearly spit coffee on my keyboard! I agree with you 100%. When we all 
did HTML with BBedit and Textpad, people like Black, Tog, and Nielsen 
kept everyone designing websites to best serve the content. Now it is 
all about the sizzle, but there is rarely a steak.


DAve

--
In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years
of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with
rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel
that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Renaming root to homer?

2008-05-29 Thread Brian



Sorry, forgot to send this to the mailing list as well:

Not recommended.

Instead edit your sshd_config file and change the option PermitRootLogin to
no.

Christian Zachariasen
  
Isnt this the Freebsd default anyway, that root cannot login remotely 
anyway, unlike that penguin OS?  SSH in remotely as a non root user that 
is in the wheel group and then su to root.


Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]