RE: [NSWolves] Comments [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED What really piss-es me off, is all the false talk about continued improvement, and the long term plan. After what has happened this year I really believe Morgan has an alterior motiveif he was concerned about his investment being totally ruined by relegation, I am certain he would have done more. This season has been one huge blunder, most of us know McCarthy was sacked months later than he should have been, but then to replace him with someone like Terry Connor was hideous.to be honest any replacement would have struggled to keep us up, but we were left with almost no hope. Now we have to start all over again...we have a team full of mercenaries who have jumped ship from relegated teams (did anyone else think the recruitment of players that had failed previously was strange?)... they will be off, and god knows what we will be left over for us to tackle to very difficult task of promotion. Its been coming for months, and I didn't feel anything last night to be honest...and looking at the crowd...neither did they -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 23 April 2012 12:28 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Comments Just feeling apathetic about the whole thing. We have been down for weeks, whoever thought Clipboard could turn things around has no idea about football. Sincerely hope SM gets his head into gear and employs a good replacement so the rollercoaster journey that is the Wolves can begin again. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 23 April 2012 11:48 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Comments Nearly 12pm on the day we have had our relegation confirmed and not a single message??? Should someone check for a pulse?? -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] The season so far! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED The writing has been on the wall for a couple of years now. The powers didn't see the signs or if they did were too stubborn to react appropriately. Now we are going down, they might wake up and realise what they have been doing doesn't work...lets face it, we were very lucky not to go down last year, and still didn't strengthen sufficiently.. Oh and Blackburn beat Sunderland . At least we'll have a half fnished half empty stadiumand the old chants of The New Stand can be reignited IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2012 08:00 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The season so far! After QPR's late winner things are looking even bleaker for us! I have been trying to think of the positives from this season but all I can think of so far is that Elliott owes me a case of Toohey's Red!! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of One Mick McCarthy from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED That all makes sense...except for the last line. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of One Mick McCarthy from Wolves fans... You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some of our lot were on holiday. The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting as hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM. TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives the ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way around. Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best player, and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ? Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock or Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back. And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a bit over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the match. Still believe we wont go down though. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick in charge. TC is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do with the same players that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as being of premier league standard. I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more past better teams thanks us eg Arsenal. Sent from my iPhone On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably satisfied with the consequences. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] Davis [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED O'hara has been disgraceful in the last few matches, why hasn't he bend dropped. Apart from his woeful passing he doesn't seem to give a sh-it, and now we are eharing he was involved in some kind of confrontation with fans after Saturday's game. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 02:08 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Davis I'm beginning to wonder if O'Hara is even capable of passing wind as he certainly can't pass a football. On 11/03/2012, at 2:51 AM, Rog Reet wrote: Good question. It's got nothing at all to do with whoever is manager though. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 2:20 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Davis This young Davis bloke seems like a decent player. Why is this the first we've seen of him? Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] Positives [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Probabaly the worst Wolves PL perfromance I've seen...absolutely terrible. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 06:46 To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Positives There was one major positive from this mornings game: From the kick-off we didn't pass it straight back to Hennessey, instead it only went to Ward at left back. So quite clearly we are making progress under Connor. The rest was pretty ordinary: Shots on target 12 - 1 to Fulham 60% possession to Fulham I can't really think of any other positives. Anyone? -- Boo! Curbishley out! IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] Remaining games / points prediction.[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED A point against Norwich looks pretty optimistic to me Marcus. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012 20:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Remaining games / points prediction. Oh no, now Steve's losing his optimism... what's going on? On 28/02/2012, at 20:59 , Steven Millward wrote: I'm not sure I'd be that optimistic. On 28 February 2012 20:56, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: My brain and eyewear this evening is a bottle of Prickly Moses IPA. Fulham 1 Blackburn 3 Man U 1 Norwich 1 Bolton 3 Stoke 1 Arsenal 0 Sunderland 1 Man City 0 Swansea 1 Everton 3 Wigan 1 Total 16, overall 38 and just safe. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012 3:24 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Remaining games / points prediction. Hello fellow Wolves tragics! I have put on the Roger rose tinted glasses and confidently forecast the following: Fulham 1 Blackburn 3 Man U 0 Norwich 1 Bolton 3 Stoke 0 Arsenal 0 Sunderland 3 Man City 0 Swansea 3 Everton 3 Wigan 3 20 points!! We will be safe. Realistically, if we can win all our games against Blackburn, Bolton and Wigan we should have a great chance of staying up. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
[NSWolves] Toon Game [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Well if ever there was a game of two halves that was it; First half, generally appalling, thought we were terrible although the second goal was a little unlicky Newcastle can consider themselves worthy of at least a 2-0 lead. Second half, gives me optimism, we were equally deserved of a two goal advantage, and overall a draw was probably about right. Doyle was much improved, the most obvious change for me, apart from a move away from wing play...or was I imaganing that?...Johnson for err please. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I picked up on that too. Totally disgraceful the way this has all panned out... Of course we don't know all the details of what has been going on / discussed behind the scenes, only what has been leaked out. It seems that whoever takes us on now is going to have to have a very thick skin, knowing he was well down the pecking order. What on earth are they playing at? Is it the short term deal thats putting people off? Seems like Walter Smith was offered the job without a proper interview or discussing finances, if thats the case we are now at the Very Desperate stage. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 05:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! Intereesting that he said he knows he was a fall back. So will everyone else now. Maybe Terry will turn us down too. On 24 February 2012 05:51, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: I was trying to be optimistic Roger! Looks like he has joined the growing list of people who have turned us down anyway! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 10:36 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! You've used the win percentage but why not the draw percentage? Gives us 4 wins and 4 draws from 13. All this brings to mind the words straws, clutching and astrology. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 8:35 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! Team Nat From To Record G W D L Win % Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 16 April 1991 31 May 1998 1038000380 1024900249 100680068 100630063 100655365.53 Everton http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everton_F.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England 1 July 1998 13 March 2002 1016800168 100530053 100500050 100650065 100315531.55 Scotland http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_national_football_team http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 1 January 2005 10 January 2007 100160016 10007007 10005005 10004004 100437543.75 Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 10 January 2007 15 May 2011 1020200202 1012800128 100450045 100290029 100633663.37 Total 1076600766 1043700437 1016800168 1016100161 100570457.05 [edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_Smithaction=editsect ion=14editintro=Template:BLP_editintro ] Honours If it is Walter, can we expect his win average of 31.55% in the Premier League? With 13 games left this would give us 13 x 0.3155 x 3 = 12 points (4 x wins). Therefore, adding this to our current 21 points sees us with 33 points. Needing us to attain 7 draws to reach the supposed safety of 40 points!! 4 wins and 7 draws from our last 13 games!! I wonder what the odds on that would be Rog? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 5:30 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! My lawn is fantastic, so it might be a good move. On 23 February 2012 12:48, Paul Hart wholiga...@gmail.com wrote: We want Moxey out on Facebook reckon Sir Walter is our
RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED The prospect of Terry Connor running the show for an extended period does not fill me with confidence, but its a funny old game. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 07:11 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] As Matt said, most of it is probably rubbish. We're set to get someone from the lower leagues then, who can see this as a big opportunity. Or let clipboard do it until the end of the season and then get someone in on a proper contract, whichever division we're in. On 24 February 2012 08:01, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED I picked up on that too. Totally disgraceful the way this has all panned out... Of course we don't know all the details of what has been going on / discussed behind the scenes, only what has been leaked out. It seems that whoever takes us on now is going to have to have a very thick skin, knowing he was well down the pecking order. What on earth are they playing at? Is it the short term deal thats putting people off? Seems like Walter Smith was offered the job without a proper interview or discussing finances, if thats the case we are now at the Very Desperate stage. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 05:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! Intereesting that he said he knows he was a fall back. So will everyone else now. Maybe Terry will turn us down too. On 24 February 2012 05:51, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: I was trying to be optimistic Roger! Looks like he has joined the growing list of people who have turned us down anyway! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 10:36 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! You've used the win percentage but why not the draw percentage? Gives us 4 wins and 4 draws from 13. All this brings to mind the words straws, clutching and astrology. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 8:35 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! Team Nat From To Record G W D L Win % Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 16 April 1991 31 May 1998 1038000380 1024900249 100680068 100630063 100655365.53 Everton http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everton_F.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England 1 July 1998 13 March 2002 1016800168 100530053 100500050 100650065 100315531.55 Scotland http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_national_football_team http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 1 January 2005 10 January 2007 100160016 10007007 10005005 10004004 100437543.75 Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 10 January 2007 15 May 2011 1020200202 1012800128 100450045 100290029 100633663.37 Total 1076600766
RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Latest rumour on Molineux Mix is Steve Bruce ...guess there aren't too many others left now. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 09:00 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] It would appear that money is an issue and we're seeing Moxey once again try to operate on a shoestring. I worked with a Stoke fan back in England who was delighted when they got rid of Moxey - he felt Moxey was holding them back and there is no questioning their progression over the last 10 years. I look at the current situation and think what value do you put on Premiership survival? The money its worth has to warrant a sizeable investment to try and stay up. The way I see it we have 2 realistic options: - get someone in on a short term contract who's a real motivator and can get a bunch of players 'over performing' for a spell - someone in the Ian Holloway mould. A 13 game contract is obviously not very attractive and so that has to be compensated for by offering a 'too tempting' financial incentive. Its no good offering a 13 game contract on bog standard Premiership wages. The value of staying in the league is phenomenal - why not offer a huge incentive to someone to keep us up? - get someone you think can progress the team long term, regardless of which league we're in, and offer them a longer term contract. Curbishley (who I wasn't excited about but now looks a shining light compared to some of the dross we've been linked with) went down with Charlton and brought them back up stronger, enjoying a prolonged period of what undoubtedly had to be viewed as success given their resources. I wouldn't mind seeing us take a punt on Poyet for this option. The situation as is is a farce. Morgan and Moxey are looking like a pair of clowns and its an embarrassment to the club. They knew this day would come and obviously knew when that day was fast approaching - why didn't they plan for it accordingly? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 9:37 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] No it's that there isn't much money to spend on transfers and the wage structure can't be changed. On 24 February 2012 08:23, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: If Clipboard is given the job until the end of the season there will be less than 10K season ticket holder's renew next season. I do not know what this vision is that the 2 x M's are referring to? It must be pretty radical or scary! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 8:11 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] As Matt said, most of it is probably rubbish. We're set to get someone from the lower leagues then, who can see this as a big opportunity. Or let clipboard do it until the end of the season and then get someone in on a proper contract, whichever division we're in. On 24 February 2012 08:01, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED I picked up on that too. Totally disgraceful the way this has all panned out... Of course we don't know all the details of what has been going on / discussed behind the scenes, only what has been leaked out. It seems that whoever takes us on now is going to have to have a very thick skin, knowing he was well down the pecking order. What on earth are they playing at? Is it the short term deal thats putting people off? Seems like Walter Smith was offered the job without a proper interview or discussing finances, if thats the case we are now at the Very Desperate stage. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
[NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED They haven't got a f-ckin clue. Its the same as when we are trying to sign players...We aren't going anywhere until they release the purse strings a little more...I bet our water tight budget is what put Curbishley off. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:46 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob. Good business sense that. On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au wrote: I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! Logohttp://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
[NSWolves] New Mananger [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Looks like we may end up with someone totally unexpected, with rumours that Curbishley and Bruce are out of the reckoning. So many names being floated now, anyone got any idea who we may end up with? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out!
[NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering DJ??? Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez. This I'll take the latter. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Clipboard out!
RE: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED So based on the blame chart how many more points would we have, if we had a blameless manager. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 09:22 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent Roger Johnson, the Wolves captain, has suggested that the players are largely responsible for McCarthy's dismissal. Johnson has endured a poor season since joining from Birmingham City in the summer and when he was asked how much blame the players should take for McCarthy's sacking, he replied: All of it. The manager can maybe take five to 10%. Young Roger not only gives 110% on the pitch but in the blame game as well. -- Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out!
RE: [NSWolves] Timing [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Whoever they choose, I'd say there will be a pretty big bonus involved for keeping us up. So many names being banded about Bruce is a real chance...moving back to the Midlands apparrantly Curbishly---a lot of people favourite, certainly did the business with Charlton for a number of years I reckon either Curbishly or someone totally out of the blue...this little situation must have been thought about for quite some timeannouncement by the weekend I reckon. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 12:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Timing I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement before the end of the week. Mick's dismissal was not just a reaction to the game on Sunday and so I'd imagine there's been some contact made already with likely candidates sounded out. I read an interesting article flipping the 'Who would your choice of manager be' question on its head to say 'Assume you get a call from Moxey saying you can't pick the new manager, but you are able to give 1 name to be scratcehd from the candidate list'. Given what I've seen so far as the more realistic candidates, that would be Steve Bruce for me. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Timing When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat? Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough time to get a grip before Newcastle. There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you were manager. The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team but tell them to play better. There must be more to football management hadn't there? -- Boo! Clipboard out! Logohttp://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out!
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
. There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I dont care if we had Tevez and Ronaldo up front theyd catch cold. Im not for changing managers but I soon will be L Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email. From: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM To: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace. I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with it. Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves. After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to criticize. However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward mailto:millward@gmail.com mailto:millward@gmail.com millward@gmail.com wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA mailto:jpar...@munichre.com mailto:jpar...@munichre.com jpar...@munichre.com wrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really dont give a sh*t who replaces him: couldnt be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. From: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves
RE: [NSWolves] Telegraph [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED The question should have been should Wolves have sacked McCarthy six months ago... The timing couldn't be any worse. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:31 To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Telegraph Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves were right to sack McCarthy. 39.96% (1,198 votes) said yes 60.04% (1,800 votes) said no Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Clipboard out! IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Clipboard out!
RE: [NSWolves] Telegraph [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I guess when you see one of your little projects faultering, you have to step in eventually. The next few weeks are critical.we've just got to get the appointment right, if that is possible. I saw a video clip of fans being interviewed after the game on Sunday, I think we all had a little bit of loyalty to Mad Mick, but it he had lost a lot of support recentlyand the stadium project was mentioned...m IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:40 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph Be interesting to see if Morgan backs off getting involved like he did with Mick for so long. I suspect he has the taste for it now. On 14 February 2012 13:30, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves were right to sack McCarthy. 39.96% (1,198 votes) said yes 60.04% (1,800 votes) said no Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out!
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED We have to take the risk and replace him now, no use worrying about who can get us back up if we go down. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 07:10 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night. For me the spark has gone out of this team, Fletcher is the standout and does very well with the limited opportunities he gets.Frimpong was looking good but there is very little else to excite meits all so bloody predictable...Jarvis's runs, the wayward passes, etc etcit really is rubbsh. I had a feeling Mad Mick would put out an attacking side because of the QPR result ...for gods sake, that was against ten men...the commentators focussed on our very attacking lineup right from the start last night, and we were lucky to get away with conceding five in all honesty. Its probably too late for a replacement to make much difference now, the damege is done...but what can we do? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 09:22 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: I always feel I'm the right person to do it. I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can do. He's said sorry , so that's all right then. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Make way for the returning messiah...the one and only Karl Henry. Seriously though Frimpong was looking like a quality addition, and will be missed, he could pass the ball well and got stuck in...just our bloody luck. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 11:53 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season That can't be right. The commentators suggested he was laying it on with a giant trowel. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:13 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2012/02/0 6/wolves-loanee-emmanuel-frimpong-out-for-season/ -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED You aint knocking our best player are you?...Well he was for about two weeks. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 12:44 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season ACL is supposed to be quite painless I believe. It's only when someone tries to walk unaided and their leg is wobbling all over the place. Now we know he's a crock, I'm suprised we aren't rushing to sign him long term. On 7 February 2012 12:52, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: That can't be right. The commentators suggested he was laying it on with a giant trowel. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:13 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2012/02/0 6/wolves-loanee-emmanuel-frimpong-out-for-season/ -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] QPR [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Hanging on for our dear lives against a ten man relegation threatened team does not fill me with confidence I'm afraid. Fair enough, we could easily have taken them apart early on but we didn't and just held on Not a bad game but we are still sh-ite -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of paul Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 02:58 To: Nsw Wolves Subject: Re: [NSWolves] QPR What a win! Watched the last 10 mins! Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra -Original Message- From: Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 02:56:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] QPR Sadly yes. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 2:38 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] QPR Is anyone else watching this $hite? Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] QPR [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Happy with the win BUT definately not the performance...face it...we got very lucky. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 6 February 2012 12:18 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] QPR [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Comes to something when you can't even be happy about a win. What's the point in even associating yourself with Wolves? On 6 February 2012 10:07, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED If Cisse hadn't have been sent off we would have been mullered. The last ten minutes weren't that enjoyable either. After they had scored there first goal, I thought to myself why don't we score goals like that Big one next week though, would be nice to drag that lot into the fight. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 6 February 2012 08:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] QPR You lucky bastard, can you advise us of your viewing plans for the next 14 games? Would be wonderful not to have to sit through vast periods of pub football with us barely able to string 3 passes together. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of paul Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 3:58 AM To: Nsw Wolves Subject: Re: [NSWolves] QPR What a win! Watched the last 10 mins! Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra -Original Message- From: Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 02:56:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] QPR Sadly yes. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 2:38 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] QPR Is anyone else watching this $hite? Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Doubt if MM is going anywhere. Terrible time to replace him too, transfer deadline looming. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of paul Sent: Wednesday, 1 February 2012 07:09 To: Nsw Wolves Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom I saw this happening first half. Good news is this could be MM's last game. Will be interesting to see the Crowd's reaction as the game progresses. Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra -Original Message- From: paul pcr...@contechengineering.com Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:29:17 To: Nsw Wolvesnswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: pcr...@contechengineering.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom How bad are we? Midfield totally dominated by Liverpool. Very lucky to be level. MM needs to make some changes at half time or else we will lose. Good chance by Kightly just now. --Original Message-- To: Nsw Wolves Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom Sent: 22 Jan 2012 13:56 I read Frimpong just had a badly swollen eye, no damage. Where did you here 3 months Marcus? --Original Message-- From: Marcus Chantry Sender: Nsw Wolves To: Nsw Wolves ReplyTo: Nsw Wolves Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom Sent: 22 Jan 2012 13:10 But as Frimpong is out for 3 months we've lost any bite or drive in midfield. Atleast we won't have to watch Henry for a few weeks. On 22/01/2012, at 13:07 , Jeremy Tonks wrote: Now that's the Paul Crowe we've all come to know and love! Situation wouldn't be so bad if Liverpool hadn't rolled over against Bolton. Any chance of the same thing happening in a couple of days? QPR looms as a very significant match. I think I'm glad MM is now forced to 'rest' Henry. Frimpong does indeed look good. JT -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of paul Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:37 AM To: Nsw Wolves Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom Henry out, fantastic! Frimpong sounds okay. We will win our next 3 games! Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra -Original Message- From: Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:26:41 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom Henry is out for 3 games, Jarvis puts in his best ever cross for a goal and still you're moaning. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 9:51 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom I don't care about the fact we played brilliantly in the first half (which we certainly did). At the end of the day football is a results game and yet again we haven't got a result. We're now 2nd from bottom with a worrying gap opening up between us and the safety positions. Not looking good at the moment. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED One of the best games I've seen Wolves involved in for a long time. The last twenty minutes were edge of your seat stuff. At half time I was hoping Doyle would come on for Milijas, who was having an off game, but he improved, and if one of those through balls had worked out things could have been different. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 07:36 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Hear the commentators then: master stroke by Lambert. Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. Sent from my iPad -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be, simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross they had previoulsyI rest my case. Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle along with MM. Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I understand the timing aspect re the economy..I blame Mick for the way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the championship more. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061 Here's some more interesting data in the table below. League rank is the position that the team finished in the league Wage rank is the position forecast by wages You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. 10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 15 teams are within two positions of their prediction 18 teams are within three positions of their prediction. I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that seemingly outperformed their resources. You'll notice all the good managers are near the top of the list: Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY The way I see if you can say that either management is important and Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant. There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad manager because the facts don't support it. Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference West Brom..11..198 Fulham8...11.. ..3 Stoke13...15.. ..2 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..13... ..2 Wolves..17...18... .1 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...4.5. ...1 Everton..7.8.. ..1 Wigan...16...16... .0 Newcastle..12...12 0 Bolton...14...14.. ..0 Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 Man City.3.2.. .-1 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..208...-12 On 19 December 2011 15:03, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Hughes's Granny would be better than MM! Maybe we should just enlist a local Gypsy as replacement for MM, as our teams performance depends on luck and other dubiously explained factors, nothing at all to do with the Manager and his coaching skills? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 2:52 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew Hold the front page. What a scoop! On 19 December 2011 11:09, Paul Hart wholiga...@gmail.com wrote: I spoke to my mate last night in Penn he heard Hughes was there. Well just have to wait and see. Sent from my iPhone On 19/12/2011, at 11:05 AM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: He dared to make a
RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now Sunderland have nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too much IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just who is it that is going to replace MM? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be, simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross they had previoulsyI rest my case. Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle along with MM. Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I understand the timing aspect re the economy..I blame Mick for the way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the championship more. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061 Here's some more interesting data in the table below. League rank is the position that the team finished in the league Wage rank is the position forecast by wages You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. 10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 15 teams are within two positions of their prediction 18 teams are within three positions of their prediction. I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that seemingly outperformed their resources. You'll notice all the good managers are near the top of the list: Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY The way I see if you can say that either management is important and Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant. There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad manager because the facts don't support it. Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference West Brom..11..198 Fulham8...11.. ..3 Stoke13...15.. ..2 Spurs..57. ...2 Man Utd..13... ..2 Wolves..17...18... .1 Blackpool...19...20... .1 Arsenal...4.5. ...1 Everton..7.8.. ..1 Wigan...16...16... .0 Newcastle..12...12 0 Bolton...14...14.. ..0 Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 Man City.3.2.. .-1 Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 Sunderland.108 -2 Aston villa...9.6...-3 Blackburn...15...12... -3 West Ham..208...-12 On 19 December 2011 15:03, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Hughes's Granny would be better than MM! Maybe we should just enlist a local Gypsy as replacement for MM, as our teams performance depends on luck and other dubiously explained factors, nothing at all to do with the Manager and his coaching
[NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the Karl Henry stats on Mol Mix? Are these stats too much of a coincidence 2010-2011 - With Karl Henry P28 ( + 1 sub ) W7 ( 21 points ) D6 ( 6 points ) L16 Pts: 27 2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry P9 W4 ( 12 points ) D1 ( 1 point ) L4 Pts: 13 points 2011-2012 - With Karl Henry P 14 W3 ( 9 points ) D2 ( 2 points ) L9 Pts: 11 2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry P1 W1 ( 3 points ) Pts: 3 IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:21 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I'm not going to put Sunderland in that basket for a few more weeks yet... ...and the wages statistics still tell me that Sh*te will fall on their collective backsides sooner rather than later :-) From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:15 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now Sunderland have nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too much IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just who is it that is going to replace MM? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be, simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross they had previoulsyI rest my case. Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle along with MM. Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I understand the timing aspect re the economy..I blame Mick for the way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the championship more. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061 Here's some more interesting data in the table below. League rank is the position that the team finished in the league Wage rank is the position forecast by wages You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. 10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 15 teams are within two positions of their prediction 18 teams are within three positions of their prediction. I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that seemingly outperformed their resources. You'll notice all the good managers are near the top of the list: Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY The way I see if you can say that either management is important and Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant. There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad manager because the facts don't support it. Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference West Brom
RE: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Thats right, lets have our own poll then. For MM = Against MM (I'm against but only if a suitable replacement is available) Should Henry be our first choice defensive midfielder = Should we sign someone specifically to replace him (I think we need someone better in his position) I also happen to believe we desperately need another quality striker. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:40 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Stats can be made to support any agenda that a person wants to push. Climate Change is the perfect example of how both sides can manipulate statistics to support their own agenda. On 20/12/2011, at 08:36 , Jeremy Tonks wrote: You've missed the point Lee ;) How much is he being paid? I'm not sure 1 game without him this season gives us any statistical validity?! I think I'd like to see which games he missed (as in opponents) as well. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:30 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the Karl Henry stats on Mol Mix? Are these stats too much of a coincidence 2010-2011 - With Karl Henry P28 ( + 1 sub ) W7 ( 21 points ) D6 ( 6 points ) L16 Pts: 27 2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry P9 W4 ( 12 points ) D1 ( 1 point ) L4 Pts: 13 points 2011-2012 - With Karl Henry P 14 W3 ( 9 points ) D2 ( 2 points ) L9 Pts: 11 2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry P1 W1 ( 3 points ) Pts: 3 IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:21 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I'm not going to put Sunderland in that basket for a few more weeks yet... ...and the wages statistics still tell me that Sh*te will fall on their collective backsides sooner rather than later :-) From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:15 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now Sunderland have nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too much IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just who is it that is going to replace MM? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be, simply because they found a bloody good manager
RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week. My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans are resigned to the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very quickly. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hart Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Did MM get any abuse ? Sent from my iPhone On 18/12/2011, at 4:22 AM, paul pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: At least Doyle scored. Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra -Original Message- From: mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:05:48 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Passing is atrocious. Henry needs to stop the 50 yard speculative passes that go straight to Stoke players. Even the short easy passes are going to their players. Stoke are the dirtiest team in the league. Nasty tackles, elbows, shoving, etc even makes Berra look ok. I hope McCarthy calls them for who they really are. And the tactics won them the match in the 2nd half. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 2:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Bad scoreline now and we're creating nothing. Sent from my iPhone On 18/12/2011, at 3:03 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Good scoreline but quality of game could be better, especially the crossing. Fletcher hasn't been in the game which is surprising. Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED To be fair, Steve Morgan needs to address the situation too. Wolves perfromances on the pitch have shown little or no improvement, the manager has to be responsible for that. The big fear for me is, we change managers and still get relegated, and so it all starts again. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 08:35 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Anyone read Soccernomics? I've read extracts but I've just ordered it. The author says that 90% of Premier league position is down to wages. I really don't understand why Mick is the scapegoat. He has the fourth cheapest wage bill and the team is fourth from bottom. If the fans really cared they'd offer to pay double the season ticket price to fund better players. Hmmm. On 19 December 2011 09:04, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Spoke to me Dad last night, who is a season ticket holder in the Steve Bull, apparently Tuesday night against Norwich could be the last chance saloon game for MM. He reckons another loss would see the fans turn against him on mass! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 8:01 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week. My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans are resigned to the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very quickly. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hart Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Did MM get any abuse ? Sent from my iPhone On 18/12/2011, at 4:22 AM, paul pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: At least Doyle scored. Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra -Original Message- From: mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:05:48 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Passing is atrocious. Henry needs to stop the 50 yard speculative passes that go straight to Stoke players. Even the short easy passes are going to their players. Stoke are the dirtiest team in the league. Nasty tackles, elbows, shoving, etc even makes Berra look ok. I hope McCarthy calls them for who they really are. And the tactics won them the match in the 2nd half. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 2:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Bad scoreline now and we're creating nothing. Sent from my iPhone On 18/12/2011, at 3:03 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Good scoreline but quality of game could be better, especially the crossing. Fletcher hasn't been in the game which is surprising. Sent from my iPhone -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender
RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Well in my opinion, Mick's team isn't good enough. Mick's tactics aren't good enough. I and I think many many others think Mick is out of his depth in the PL. Who knows, our squad may be capable of much more under a better manager. Its also possible that Mick has got this bunch punching well above there weight and they will be even worse with another managerwe just don't know, there lies the risk. What I do know is, the team should be showing more improvement, the squad should have been stregthened more. We all shudder everytime Mick says he doesn't need to sign more / better players because he's happy with his squad. Its Mick's fault we are not improving. Thats the bottom line. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 09:01 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] How can I explain this more clearly. 90% of the results are down to the quality of players We have the fourth worst players in the league. We have no right to finish above where we currently sit If we look bad in matches it's because we are playing against better players Why do you keep saying its all Mick's fault? On 19 December 2011 09:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED To be fair, Steve Morgan needs to address the situation too. Wolves perfromances on the pitch have shown little or no improvement, the manager has to be responsible for that. The big fear for me is, we change managers and still get relegated, and so it all starts again. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 08:35 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Anyone read Soccernomics? I've read extracts but I've just ordered it. The author says that 90% of Premier league position is down to wages. I really don't understand why Mick is the scapegoat. He has the fourth cheapest wage bill and the team is fourth from bottom. If the fans really cared they'd offer to pay double the season ticket price to fund better players. Hmmm. On 19 December 2011 09:04, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Spoke to me Dad last night, who is a season ticket holder in the Steve Bull, apparently Tuesday night against Norwich could be the last chance saloon game for MM. He reckons another loss would see the fans turn against him on mass! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 8:01 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week. My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans are resigned to the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very quickly. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hart Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? Did MM get any abuse ? Sent
RE: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic) [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I did wonder what had happened. A man could die of thirst. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2011 13:01 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic) Hi Paul, we all missed out on the Banks's order as the importer in Perth decided to give it all to a shop in Perth rather than send it to us over here in Sydney. He claims that the next shipment in Jan/Feb will be sent to us in Sydney, but I'm not holding my breath after the last 2 failures. On 14/12/2011, at 07:03 , Paul Hart wrote: Hooray I'm working now ! Does that mean I missed out on the Bankss order ? Do you have any left Marcus ? Sent from my iPhone On 13/12/2011, at 8:48 PM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: it is also blocking Matt Leese, perhaps he's coming up as an Everton fan. On 13/12/2011, at 20:15 , Jeremy Tonks wrote: Steve's artificially intelligent spam filter has evidently flagged you automatically as a Spurs supporter :-( From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 8:11 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic) They are getting flagged as spam. I had to post it manually. You should be OK from now on. On 13 December 2011 18:32, Paul Hart wholiga...@gmail.com wrote: I always bet against the wolves then it's always win win I was at the last gathering . The bold head with my wife . I hope to make it to the next one Marcus ... Dont know if these emails are getting through as I ordered some bank s ale with no relpy up the wolves Please respond ... Anybody Sent from my iPhone On 13/12/2011, at 6:05 PM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I've been betting against Wolves all season and it's had stuff all effect. (it's cost me a lot of money though) On 13/12/2011, at 15:11 , Jeremy Tonks wrote: Leave him alone Steven... I'm hoping he'll start tipping against Wolves. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 3:03 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic) Not like you to be wrong about a football matter Marcus. Ohhang on a minute On 13/12/2011, at 7:30 AM, Chantrys chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: Watching Man City against Chelsea at the moment and the way that City are playing Chelsea off the park I really can't see anyone stopping City. Their passing at the moment is Barcelona-esque. Very very impressive, but I guess they've spent a couple of pounds to get the team capable of playing like that. Where's our Shiek? Sent from my iPad -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Who'd have thought Ward and Craddock would be such important players for us? Who'd have thought Doyle would be almost ineffective after so much promise? Who'd have thought Fletch would be our twenty a season man? Who'd have thought Edwards would replace Henry and we'd start winning games again? ME Who'd have thought Zubar would make the difference? One of our more flamboyant players. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 07:16 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! No worries now Steve, MM has been given a 3m war chest! With his undoubted superior talent for finding a bargain we should be safe. You still sure about that carton of beer bet? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I am amazed that it does actually appear like there could be three or even more teams worse than us this year. I honestly didn't think that was the case a couple of weeks ago. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 08:48 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Absolutely correct Rog - but our GEM is the best available and (somehow) he is doing the job! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 9:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 8:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Who'd have thought Ward and Craddock would be such important players for us? Certainly not our GEM who sent the latter out on loan. Who'd have thought Doyle would be almost ineffective after so much promise? Not our GEM Who'd have thought Fletch would be our twenty a season man? Not our GEM who hardly played him because he never ran around like a headless chook. Who'd have thought Edwards would replace Henry and we'd start winning games again? ME Not our GEM Who'd have thought Zubar would make the difference? One of our more flamboyant players. Not our GEM as he's no ing idea what flamboyant means. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 07:16 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! No worries now Steve, MM has been given a 3m war chest! With his undoubted superior talent for finding a bargain we should be safe. You still sure about that carton of beer bet? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Its like turning back the clock five months, except we are in much worse shape now the one big hope signing has so far been a flop. Thats a wish list most had last July. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 12:47 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland Steve, the more I think about this the more I believe some shrewd business in the January transfer window will be the factor. Whichever teams in and around us do the best business in January will stay up. So, who would you like to see us buy in the New Year? My wish list, apart from a new Manager, is: 1. Left Back 2. Creative Midfielder who can also defend (to replace Henry) 3. Centre Half 4. Centre forward / Inside forward - someone like Solksjaer who can come on as sub and score a goal or change the game We probably need 2 x midfielder's as Milijas will be sold along with Hammil. The problem is if we are in the bottom 3 come January who will want to join us? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 11:56 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Sunnerland Be interesing to see where Sunderland end up this season relative to Wolves, and whether a new manager solves their problem. Supposedly it should. On 1 December 2011 11:12, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: 2 wins in the last 10? That's even better than our greatest ever manager. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 9:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland It will be interesting to see if Sunderland had a new Manager already lined up? If so, no reason, why he can't take charge for Sunday's game. I lived in Newcastle for a couple of years and used to go to Roker Park whenever Newcastle played away. Sunderland fans are some of the best going and generally speaking back the Manager religiously. However, if you go on their various forums the overwhelming opinion was for Bruce to go asap! Basically 2 wins in 10 games just not good enough. A very similar record to our beloved MM. I wonder if the other M's have a plan if Sunday's game is a disaster? Teams that sack their Manager always seem to win the next game. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 9:44 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland What are you saying Rog? Should they let us have it as a walkover? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 8:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Sunnerland The cheeky buggers. They think they can beat us without a manager. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I agree, Ward has improved, and is a very valuable team member... not sure that the others have actually improved much .. Jarvis was just as inconsistant when I saw him two years ago, I believe his form has declined lately. Fletcher looked good from the start when he was given an opportunity Hennessey -yes I'd agree there Henry - Holding midfielder? seriously Stearman - depends which games you have watched, he has been hopeless at times. Edwards - Not really sure until I see him have an extended run O'hara does look skillful but those stary passes ...frustrating Hunt - similar to O'hara ...workhorse, valuable player Johnson - Not impressed Doyle - ineffective goal scorer, is that what he is?? I really don't know. Could be brilliant with an effective front two, if he stayed upright a little longer. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2011 07:11 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Ward (excellent player all round). Jarvis (league 1 to England squad). Fletcher (best striker at our club) Henessey (from reserve to excellent 1st choice keeper) Henry (very good holding midfielder) Stearman (much more confident and able at right back) Edwards (deserves a place in a PL team having not been good enough for a championship team in the early days) Ones who are about the same (perhaps at the limit of their ability) Hunt Johnson Doyle O'Hara In my view all of our championship team have stepped up and improved. It's the new signings by and large that aren't improving any more On 22 November 2011 08:03, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED Just as a matter of interest, who do we think has actually improved under Mick and his crew's coaching? Berra? I admit we are playing the ball around much better these days, but the finished product is non existant, we are woefully short of creative ideas and GOALS...isn't this exactly what we all thought Milijas was most capable of improving?. Better get used to it, because all the signs are that there will be no changes in the foreseable future. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 21 November 2011 14:50 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from? From what I've seen he's a very talented, creative midfielder. Better vision than anyone else in our squad and the player most likely to 'make things happen' from a central midfield position. I think the problem is that Mick has tried to turn him into something that he's not (ie a grafter) and so he is no able to play his 'natural' game. For our first season in the Prem I was prepared to accept that we were right up against it with the squad we had and the sort of players we would be able to attract in order to strengthen the squad, and would therefore need to 'graft' to make ourselves hard to beat and nick a few results. Stoke did exactly that in their first season but have gradually built year on year from there, transforming their squad and the type of football they play. I don't see us doing the same - Mick still wants a team of grafters and seems prepared to put a willingness to 'die for the cause' ahead of ability. I think we need a mix of graft and guile, but then I'm not the manager and so my thoughts count for nothing when it comes to the team that gets picked each week. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 21 November 2011 1:29 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from? He's another one of these players like Freddy and that homesick Dutchman. The fans think he's better than he really is. It's been a theme on Mol Mix for many months that he's fallen out with Mick etc but I just don't think he's that good. Even if he's had enough, he would surely still do as well as possible to put himself in the shop
[NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Maybe the believers are starting not to believe. So The Mad Mick Out campaign re commences. It may not even be Macarthy's fault that we didn't strengthen further, if thats the case, it would be nice to know who makes these brilliant decisions. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Have we ever stopped saying that? I think it was pointed out after we struggled to beat Blackburn. If they can spend money on stadium improvemnets that aren't required, they should be able to find money for players that are obvioulsy required. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 09:04 To: nswolves Subject: Fwd: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] I see we are back to we should have bought more quality players. I'm still waiting for someone to say where the money should be coming from. It's been nearly six months now and nobody has explained it to me. -- Forwarded message -- From: Steven Millward millward@gmail.com Date: 23 May 2011 09:25 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] To: nswolves@googlegroups.com We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves. Some real quality is needed, we paid big money... Agreed. It would be great to improve the side. Your suggestion is that we spend big money to do it. So who's going to put the money up? You? Or are you suggesting that we borrow the money? And what about wages, should we borrow to pay those too? I'm still dying to hear some constructive analysis about how the club should change the way it is run cause I'm not hearing much except buy more expensive players. On 23 May 2011 09:01, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I'm very happy we have stayed up, but as I said to a mate last night, we can't keep going through this every year. Elokobi is an awesome Guy, loves our club to bits and has improved out of site over the last couple of years, and I hope he keeps improving. I'm just not sure he is good enough yet Henry is definately not, he panicked every time he got given the ball last night, was wreckless in the challenge, and lucky not to cost us either by being sent off or giving stupid free kicks away. We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves. Some real quality is needed, we paid big money for Doyle, who kept us up last year and big money for Fletcher and Hunt, who were both keys to us finally staying up this year. So no coincidence that serious money needs to be spent to make a serious difference. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 08:46 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] Hunt was magnificent today, his terrier, never say die work ethic turned the tide for us second half and what a goal to cap his performance of with!! Wish list for next season: Left Back Centre Half O'Hara Centre midfielder Striker I can see the likes of Milijas, Ebanks-Blake, Elokobi and Henry (please God) being moved on in the Summer to generate funds for new signings. Still think Milijas has something to offer us but MM doesn't see it so best to move him on. Can't see Morgan getting rid of MM after keeping us up, huge call if he does. It will be interesting to see who replaces Clipboard? Maybe this new guy will have an impact on tactics / team selection? Very enjoyable season in the end, 11 wins and a couple more points than last year, just wish we could be more consistent. Marcus's how about starting at that same Pub we went to last year? Better beer than Royal North Shore! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 8:00 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] Not you. Marcus lost the bet. He's on our side now. But to be honest, I'm sick of hearing the club I love get bashed week in week out. Why don't you
RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Why don't we sit somewhere in the middle then? A little less on the stadium and more on players. Is this more about Morgan's long term business plan or Wolves on field success? Personally I think its a very dangerous game that we are playing, hardly strengthening a team that barely survived relegation last year cannot be anything other than a big risk IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 13:10 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Some people have stopped saying it. I assume Wolves is run like any other business that needs to break even or make a profit to avoid the risk of going bust. We have the best run business in the league. Unfortunately that is not consistent with having the best team' in the league in the short term. In the long term, it should pay off as we don't have a load of debt to suck resources from the football budget. Arsenal have cleared out a lot of players as they can't afford the wages anymore. The football world is starting to turn. There are plenty of clubs that are heading towards real financial trouble with the level of debt they are carrying. Whether the stadium expansion was a good idea is the only question here. I can only assume that the business plan was sound in that it gavea stream of money over the long term that could be used for football purposes whereas spending money on players and wages is a short term fix that catches up in the end On 4 October 2011 10:57, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED Have we ever stopped saying that? I think it was pointed out after we struggled to beat Blackburn. If they can spend money on stadium improvemnets that aren't required, they should be able to find money for players that are obvioulsy required. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 09:04 To: nswolves Subject: Fwd: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] I see we are back to we should have bought more quality players. I'm still waiting for someone to say where the money should be coming from. It's been nearly six months now and nobody has explained it to me. -- Forwarded message -- From: Steven Millward millward@gmail.com Date: 23 May 2011 09:25 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] To: nswolves@googlegroups.com We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves. Some real quality is needed, we paid big money... Agreed. It would be great to improve the side. Your suggestion is that we spend big money to do it. So who's going to put the money up? You? Or are you suggesting that we borrow the money? And what about wages, should we borrow to pay those too? I'm still dying to hear some constructive analysis about how the club should change the way it is run cause I'm not hearing much except buy more expensive players. On 23 May 2011 09:01, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I'm very happy we have stayed up, but as I said to a mate last night, we can't keep going through this every year. Elokobi is an awesome Guy, loves our club to bits and has improved out of site over the last couple of years, and I hope he keeps improving. I'm just not sure he is good enough yet Henry is definately not, he panicked every time he got given the ball last night, was wreckless in the challenge, and lucky not to cost us either by being sent off or giving stupid free kicks away. We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves. Some real quality is needed, we paid big money for Doyle, who kept us up last year and big money for Fletcher and Hunt, who were both keys to us finally staying up
[NSWolves] No Comment [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED No deedback about Saturday's game? I was away and didn't watch, so will not comment on the performance. Seems like the natives are getting very restless though. I do not agree with booing players or cheering the substitution of any Wolves player, Wolves fans are notoriously fickle like that, and it seems like more and more are seeing Karl Henry as one of our very big weak links. Any thoughts? Is Mad Mick safe? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Bin dippers [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED You can say we should have or could have all season, we could still go down...lol. Overall, thought we played well but the damage was done in the first half, due to individual errors, and based on the way we turned the game around after making changes I'd say managerial decisions too. I'll eat humble pie and say Henry played wellmuch more defensively, which is where he should be. Doyle just not cutting the mustard anymore for me. How many times does he score? A lot less than how many times he falls on his arse. Doherty was impressive, nice and steady. Still a couple of quality players short. Wonder if Macfadden can score the goals Doyle doesn't?? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 25 September 2011 07:47 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Bin dippers First game I've watched for a while. One all would have been fair. I don't think we should fear anyone anymore. Doherty looked terrified as he was waiting to come on. Seems like a long time since we've had anyone from the academy hitting the first team. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED We are now being caught out, let the struggle commence. We are woeful in midfield, only partly due to Henry being out of his depth, O'Hara isn't exactly setting the world on fire either..If a team nulifies our wing threat we are in trouble every time. We also need a quality striker. As I said after Blackburn (the result which gave a lot of people a false sense of security)we really had to bring in more than one player during the off season...and we didn't. Mick and Co are deluded if they thought / think the squad we have is sufficient for anything other than a relegation scrap. Woeful stuff -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 15:00 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] I'm not a huge fan of Joey Barton (insert stronger language here) but he does seem to know a thing or two about 'Kelvin' Henry. JT -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 2:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] I wish I could tell you how very very bad Henry was, but I'd be accused of simply picking on him because I don't like him. Let's just say that Barton probably wasn't wide of the mark when he called Henry a sunday league player. - Original Message - From: paul [mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com] Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 01:56 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Just seen the goals, Elekobi at fault for the first one. Changes next week, how bad was Henry Marcus? Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra -Original Message- From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:17:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Can't wait to hear the happy clapper explanation for the opening 20 minutes. Anyone watching? The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Very poor performance, very poor crowd and all played out in front of the three M's. I bet Morgan wonders why he's plopughing all that money into the stadium. I thought we'd be selling out with the reduced capacity. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 19 September 2011 07:07 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] It will actually do us some good Jarvis being booed repeatedly for his crap wasted crosses. They have been frequently crap for a long time, and no-one except the fans seem to notice it. Hopefully he knows now and will do something about it. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 19 September 2011 7:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED We are now being caught out, let the struggle commence. We are woeful in midfield, only partly due to Henry being out of his depth, O'Hara isn't exactly setting the world on fire either..If a team nulifies our wing threat we are in trouble every time. We also need a quality striker. As I said after Blackburn (the result which gave a lot of people a false sense of security)we really had to bring in more than one player during the off season...and we didn't. Mick and Co are deluded if they thought / think the squad we have is sufficient for anything other than a relegation scrap. Woeful stuff -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 15:00 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] I'm not a huge fan of Joey Barton (insert stronger language here) but he does seem to know a thing or two about 'Kelvin' Henry. JT -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 2:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] I wish I could tell you how very very bad Henry was, but I'd be accused of simply picking on him because I don't like him. Let's just say that Barton probably wasn't wide of the mark when he called Henry a sunday league player. - Original Message - From: paul [mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com] Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 01:56 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Just seen the goals, Elekobi at fault for the first one. Changes next week, how bad was Henry Marcus? Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra -Original Message- From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:17:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Can't wait to hear the happy clapper explanation for the opening 20 minutes. Anyone watching? The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I really think the Spurs game highlighted Henry's inadequcies more than ever. He doesn't look up to the same level as the rest of our team never mind a classy side like Spurs. The ball comes to him too quickly and it looks to me as if he doesn't know what to do with it most of the time. Good crack at goal though, can't fault that bit of play. We need quality in his position asap. Thought we looked very good for twenty minutes or so in the first half, the best I've seen us play (I think). Then we went through a spell where nobody seemed to want the ball, wonder which influential midfielder's tactics have rubbed off there? We are so close to being a very decent side but I'll say it again, our reluctance to strengthen will be the difference between a relegation scrap and a comfortable mid table position. Thought Doyle played fantastic in the first half, couldn't fault the defence either. Ward continues to impress, and to my total surprise so does Berra. Johnson has made a huge difference there I think. We look so much better when Foley comes on. Give him a start instead of Henry. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Sunday, 11 September 2011 01:11 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] How many more times in a game can henry get caught in possession? He is a joke! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
[NSWolves] No Transfers [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Maybe something is possible in that respect then IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2011 08:42 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] No Transfers [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Can't you still get loan players outside of the window ? On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED So while everyone around us strengthens prior to the transfer deadline, complecency sets in partly in my opinion because we have had three reasonable results so far this season. Hopefully we won't be regretting this in a few weeks time, and my concerns prove unfounded. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED The winning habit is a good thing, roll on Villa.some of our fringe players weren't that impressive according to reports, or are Wolves fans starting to expect excellence...lol From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:43 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? Only one downside... Sh*te went through as well. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:42 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Cup run? Who'd've thunk it. Only a few weeks ago we'd have been 'chorley concerned' about a cup fixture like Nants... ...but even with a second string side I wasn't expecting any problems. There's a good feeling around the club for some reason ;) JT -- -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I'd rather hear that than the usual we can concentrate on the league now after being knocked out. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 09:36 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Good grief!! The second string win 4 - 0 away from home and people are still not happy!! Typical fickle Wolves fans, why do they bother following us? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:54 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED The winning habit is a good thing, roll on Villa.some of our fringe players weren't that impressive according to reports, or are Wolves fans starting to expect excellence...lol From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:43 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? Only one downside... Sh*te went through as well. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:42 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Cup run? Who'd've thunk it. Only a few weeks ago we'd have been 'chorley concerned' about a cup fixture like Nants... ...but even with a second string side I wasn't expecting any problems. There's a good feeling around the club for some reason ;) JT -- -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Interesting discussion on Molineux Mix about Man City. Give me the ups and downs of Wolves any day of the week. The joys of winning the one off big game rather than expectations of winning everything. What's happening at Man City is totally wrong, they are ruining the game. I'd love to see them finish teh season empty handed, but I doubt that will happen. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 09:55 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Yeah, its easy to just criticise week in week out. Success in football is fleeting at best, even for the top clubs. I remember mates when I was in the UK back in the 80s, who were Liverpool fans, feeling dejected because they'd only won 2 cups that season. Pure greed. Life is too short to not enjoy a good run or victory while it lasts, cause we know it won't for long. Its about time fans really gave MM some credit for the great job he's already done, like the club has, and is still doing, instead of turning on him as soon as a few results go against us. On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Good grief!! The second string win 4 - 0 away from home and people are still not happy!! Typical fickle Wolves fans, why do they bother following us? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 tel:02%2097396636 Fax: 02 97396542 tel:02%2097396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:54 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED The winning habit is a good thing, roll on Villa.some of our fringe players weren't that impressive according to reports, or are Wolves fans starting to expect excellence...lol From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:43 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? Only one downside... Sh*te went through as well. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:42 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Cup run? Who'd've thunk it. Only a few weeks ago we'd have been 'chorley concerned' about a cup fixture like Nants... ...but even with a second string side I wasn't expecting any problems. There's a good feeling around the club for some reason ;) JT -- -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I think 'superb is a little bit of an exageration. Superb for Henry maybe? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 19:38 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Funny you both say that when Henry was reported to have been superb last night. Did you think he was rubbish or is it just dogma? On 22 August 2011 09:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED I'd agree with that. Foley is a much better player than Henry. Not sure we need him to push forward too much with our current team but more so than Henry. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 09:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I reckon Foley should replace Henry. Has performs the defensive side of the role better than Henry and has more natural instinct to get forward as well. That would be the only change I'd make to the team at the moment. Ward was great last night, nearly 50% of Jarvis' crosses found a Wolves player, Doyle stayed on his feet for a good portion of the game. Happy times indeed. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:42 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Credit where credit is due, they played very well. Very impressive. Even the usual targets like Berra and to a lesser extent Henry played well. I thought Jarvis was outstanding, and O'hara was much better, he still gave the ball away a few times but maybe this is because he's got such a good footballing brain.doesn't mind a shot does he... Hunt is starting to really impress, he'd be a nightmare to play againstsimilar to O'hara...likesa shot and is sometimes ahead of the others with his forward play. Fletcher and Doyle also complimenting each other. Its a tricky one but I thought we looked better with Foley on the pitch...where could you fit him in though? Much better, Fulham looked good at times in the first half and I thought they'd really test us, very sharp play, but they had no answer after we had taken the lead.could have been a big win Roll on VillaI was even hoping that Bolton and Man City would draw so we could stay toplol Another win against Villa and I'm converted IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 08:32 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Best start Two wins from two. Hentry and Jarvis playing well. Playing 442. Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today? -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Credit where credit is due, they played very well. Very impressive. Even the usual targets like Berra and to a lesser extent Henry played well. I thought Jarvis was outstanding, and O'hara was much better, he still gave the ball away a few times but maybe this is because he's got such a good footballing brain.doesn't mind a shot does he... Hunt is starting to really impress, he'd be a nightmare to play againstsimilar to O'hara...likesa shot and is sometimes ahead of the others with his forward play. Fletcher and Doyle also complimenting each other. Its a tricky one but I thought we looked better with Foley on the pitch...where could you fit him in though? Much better, Fulham looked good at times in the first half and I thought they'd really test us, very sharp play, but they had no answer after we had taken the lead.could have been a big win Roll on VillaI was even hoping that Bolton and Man City would draw so we could stay toplol Another win against Villa and I'm converted IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 08:32 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Best start Two wins from two. Hentry and Jarvis playing well. Playing 442. Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today? -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I'd agree with that. Foley is a much better player than Henry. Not sure we need him to push forward too much with our current team but more so than Henry. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 09:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I reckon Foley should replace Henry. Has performs the defensive side of the role better than Henry and has more natural instinct to get forward as well. That would be the only change I'd make to the team at the moment. Ward was great last night, nearly 50% of Jarvis' crosses found a Wolves player, Doyle stayed on his feet for a good portion of the game. Happy times indeed. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:42 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Credit where credit is due, they played very well. Very impressive. Even the usual targets like Berra and to a lesser extent Henry played well. I thought Jarvis was outstanding, and O'hara was much better, he still gave the ball away a few times but maybe this is because he's got such a good footballing brain.doesn't mind a shot does he... Hunt is starting to really impress, he'd be a nightmare to play againstsimilar to O'hara...likesa shot and is sometimes ahead of the others with his forward play. Fletcher and Doyle also complimenting each other. Its a tricky one but I thought we looked better with Foley on the pitch...where could you fit him in though? Much better, Fulham looked good at times in the first half and I thought they'd really test us, very sharp play, but they had no answer after we had taken the lead.could have been a big win Roll on VillaI was even hoping that Bolton and Man City would draw so we could stay toplol Another win against Villa and I'm converted IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 08:32 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Best start Two wins from two. Hentry and Jarvis playing well. Playing 442. Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today? -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED It was rather ordinary until the goals went in. I think that the commentator is warming to us thoughwho is he be the way? (ex West Ham player) IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 10:12 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start How sad - a bloke moves to the fresh fish capital of the known universe and all he can do is watch fish fingers defrost. Is that more appropriate comment for this time of the season Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 9:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start Had more exciting times watching fish fingers defrost. Didn't think we could pass comment until the last game of the season was over. That's been the mantra from the one eyed, happy clappers for seasons. Thought it had morphed into a rule for the list. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:32 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Best start Two wins from two. Hentry and Jarvis playing well. Playing 442. Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today? -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I don't mind him...usually gives an honest assessment IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 11:35 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Tony Gale(?) was the Londoner. Think he played for some of the lesser London clubs. Always seemed pretty fair when adding his twobobsworth on any game. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 10:29 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED It was rather ordinary until the goals went in. I think that the commentator is warming to us thoughwho is he be the way? (ex West Ham player) IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 10:12 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start How sad - a bloke moves to the fresh fish capital of the known universe and all he can do is watch fish fingers defrost. Is that more appropriate comment for this time of the season Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 9:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start Had more exciting times watching fish fingers defrost. Didn't think we could pass comment until the last game of the season was over. That's been the mantra from the one eyed, happy clappers for seasons. Thought it had morphed into a rule for the list. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:32 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Best start Two wins from two. Hentry and Jarvis playing well. Playing 442. Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today? -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really that good. Central midfield and defence will be our downfall. We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle. Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy stuff?? Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Boo! Thick Mick out. Conceded a goal. Still not sorted left back. Henry's rubbish. etc etc On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in days of yore? The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in the 1960 Cup Final. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;) I am surprised that things are so quiet. When was the last time we won away on day one Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the season opener. Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn than I had imagined. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I remember Keene scoring a couple when we beat Norwich years ago. Nobody had ever herad of him. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 13:57 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in days of yore? The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in the 1960 Cup Final. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;) I am surprised that things are so quiet. When was the last time we won away on day one Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the season opener. Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn than I had imagined. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Credit where credit is due, Fletcher and Ward were excellent, Jarvis caused problems but he seems to have changed direction...the rest were as per last year really. When I saw the team, Johnson was the only addition from last year...we all know we need more than that shirley? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 08:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Sigh. On 15 August 2011 07:57, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really that good. Central midfield and defence will be our downfall. We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle. Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy stuff?? Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Boo! Thick Mick out. Conceded a goal. Still not sorted left back. Henry's rubbish. etc etc On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in days of yore? The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in the 1960 Cup Final. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;) I am surprised that things are so quiet. When was the last time we won away on day one Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the season opener. Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn than I had imagined. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Just being realistic Paul. Blackburn were missing two key defenders and were quite poor. As I said I am happy with the win, we deserved it. However I think we need strengthening, in exactly the same positions as we did at the end of last season Agreed, if we beat Fulham next weekend, it would be awesome. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 09:01 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Come on Lee, it was only the first game and we won for crying out loud! I think you are being a trifle harsh after just one game. In terms of new player's I wouldn't be surprised if we have made bids for several player's but have refused to pay the asking price or couldn't accommodate the player's wages? I will be happy with 17th again this season, consolidation is the long term plan. A win against Fulham would be a dream start! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 7:58 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really that good. Central midfield and defence will be our downfall. We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle. Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy stuff?? Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Boo! Thick Mick out. Conceded a goal. Still not sorted left back. Henry's rubbish. etc etc On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in days of yore? The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in the 1960 Cup Final. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;) I am surprised that things are so quiet. When was the last time we won away on day one Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the season opener. Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn than I had imagined. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED He's obviously been putting in a shift...hahahaha..sorry couldn't help myself. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 13:45 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Hopefully a potential buyer was at the Blackburn game or someone is interested in buying him. God knows who as I think he is pants! Fingers crossed someone will take him off our hands. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 1:32 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] How come nobody has mentioned the rare appearance of The Neck? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 1:27 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Complacency will be our downfall, we scraped survival by the skin of our teeth and our manager is happy with the team???...if you honestly believe Johnson alone will make that much difference when the likes of Henry are getting worse then so be it. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 13:23 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Yes Johnson is the only addition to the team that took 26 points from the second half of the season. On 15 August 2011 08:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED Credit where credit is due, Fletcher and Ward were excellent, Jarvis caused problems but he seems to have changed direction...the rest were as per last year really. When I saw the team, Johnson was the only addition from last year...we all know we need more than that shirley? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 08:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Sigh. On 15 August 2011 07:57, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really that good. Central midfield and defence will be our downfall. We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle. Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy stuff?? Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Boo! Thick Mick out. Conceded a goal. Still not sorted left back. Henry's rubbish. etc etc On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in days of yore? The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in the 1960 Cup Final. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;) I am surprised that things are so quiet. When was the last time we won away on day one Rog? From: nswolves
[NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the season opener. Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn than I had imagined. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
[NSWolves] Thailand Wolves [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Can anyone who went over to Perth remember the name of the bar in Thailand run by Thai Bri or whatever his name was? and where wa sit. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
[NSWolves] De de de de Michael Kightly [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED Sounds like Michael Kightly is going to be like a new signing for us. I'm starting to feel like one of those happy clapper types... IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]
Well now you mention it, there are interstate associates toowarmer weather this time of year. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:43 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting I guess we are called NSWolves, not SydneyCBDWolves, so we should consider alternative venues for future events that will enable to spread the word and goodwill of Wolves to further parts of NSW. Future meetings could include: NSWolves Bundanoon Booze-up NSWolves Boambee East Beer Feast NSWolves Moss Vale Mash-up NSWolves Parramatta Chatter-fest From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting C'mon Paul, next thing someone will want it in Moss Vale or Coffs Harbor - what are you thinking! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 9:10 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting No. On 5 July 2011 15:33, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Can we have one of these things in Parramatta or anywhere west of Central station one of these days? Looks a posh venue by the way, looking forward to it! Cheers Paul. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 1:05 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting Excellent choice. It's on Mol Mix On 5 July 2011 09:34, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Morning all, It's been a long time coming but the NSWolves winter meeting will be held on Saturday 16th July 2011. As usual, bring along your friends, family, football fans so we can all share in the glorious achievements of Merlin the Magician. Venue: Lord Dudley Hotelhttp://www.lorddudley.com.au/ (Only 5 minutes from the City and handy from Eastern Suburbs) Time: 12pm onwards See you there. Marcus PS. Can someone post this on the other Wolves list and MolMix. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]
Hang on, didn't you choose Queensland, as a special place to pop a special question? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 11:06 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified] It lowers the tone of the club if people know it includes Queensland members. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 11:05 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified] Surely OzWolves has better marketing value From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 11:03 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified] We're called NSWolves, not OzWolves!!! Don't push it. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:51 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified] Well now you mention it, there are interstate associates toowarmer weather this time of year. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:43 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting I guess we are called NSWolves, not SydneyCBDWolves, so we should consider alternative venues for future events that will enable to spread the word and goodwill of Wolves to further parts of NSW. Future meetings could include: NSWolves Bundanoon Booze-up NSWolves Boambee East Beer Feast NSWolves Moss Vale Mash-up NSWolves Parramatta Chatter-fest From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting C'mon Paul, next thing someone will want it in Moss Vale or Coffs Harbor - what are you thinking! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 9:10 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting No. On 5 July 2011 15:33, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Can we have one of these things in Parramatta or anywhere west of Central station one of these days? Looks a posh venue by the way, looking forward to it! Cheers Paul. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 1:05 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting Excellent choice. It's on Mol Mix On 5 July 2011 09:34, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Morning all, It's been a long time coming but the NSWolves winter meeting will be held on Saturday 16th July 2011. As usual, bring along your friends, family, football fans so we can all share in the glorious achievements of Merlin the Magician. Venue: Lord Dudley Hotelhttp://www.lorddudley.com.au/ (Only 5 minutes from the City and handy from Eastern Suburbs) Time: 12pm onwards See you there. Marcus PS. Can someone post this on the other Wolves list and MolMix. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I reckon his signing will be confirmed tonight (our time). The bookies usually have an idea of what's happening and he's very very short priced, as is Upson. If we get those two in and Berra joins Halford on the way out...I think we only really need a couple more quality signings...none of the lower league ones for the future types...I mean decent money signings. Quality replacements for Henry and Elokobi are needed for us to push on but I have my doubts about Mad Mick going all out to replace either now. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2011 13:51 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] He hasn't signed yet and I reckon he'll be weighing up other offers. He said that the process was only half-complete and he'll see what happens. Also noticed that ESPN are reporting that Doyle is off to either Arsenal or Juventus. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2011 1:37 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Looks like Johnson from Small Heath is a done deal. Excellent move. Shows great intent to spend 7m on a defender On 4 July 2011 14:22, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: We all saw what happened when he was out of the side. We were shot. He is a valuable player for us, of that there is no doubt. I never get into how much a player is worth or what we should pay...I'm not the club accountant but the problem is, knowing Wolves, if we got $15m we would only buy a $5m replacement and the other $10m would mysteriously dissapear. Incidentally was at the Mol last week, the North Bonk has been completely flattened, quite a strange sight looking straight into the ground from the big car park. I'm not too sure about the new shirt yet either...its a very bright shade and longI was at the club shop the day they went on sale...no lineups or mass crowds...it would have been staright in and out if it wasn't for the seven quid barclays patches on the sleeves. Anyone seen the George Elokobi clip where he returns to Cameroon?...what a legend... From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 13:58 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle I think he'd have his price, maybe $15m. If Arsenal are interested through, he must be even better than we think On 4 July 2011 11:42, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: No way we will sell Doyle. If we do then our ambition that Morgan is talking about will have been thrown out the window. Besides 20 million for Henderson and only 12 million for Doyle? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 11:30 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Arsenal-target-Wolves-striker-Kevin-Doyle-for-a-12million-move-to-the-Emirates-article755880.html -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
[NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
We all saw what happened when he was out of the side. We were shot. He is a valuable player for us, of that there is no doubt. I never get into how much a player is worth or what we should pay...I'm not the club accountant but the problem is, knowing Wolves, if we got $15m we would only buy a $5m replacement and the other $10m would mysteriously dissapear. Incidentally was at the Mol last week, the North Bonk has been completely flattened, quite a strange sight looking straight into the ground from the big car park. I'm not too sure about the new shirt yet either...its a very bright shade and longI was at the club shop the day they went on sale...no lineups or mass crowds...it would have been staright in and out if it wasn't for the seven quid barclays patches on the sleeves. Anyone seen the George Elokobi clip where he returns to Cameroon?...what a legend... From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 13:58 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle I think he'd have his price, maybe $15m. If Arsenal are interested through, he must be even better than we think On 4 July 2011 11:42, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: No way we will sell Doyle. If we do then our ambition that Morgan is talking about will have been thrown out the window. Besides 20 million for Henderson and only 12 million for Doyle? Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 11:30 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Arsenal-target-Wolves-striker-Kevin-Doyle-for-a-12million-move-to-the-Emirates-article755880.html -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Two things I miss about England [sec=unclassified]
I used to miss Roe and Chips but found somewhere that sells roe now. The beer's getting better here but still miss a good pint in a friendly local pub. Marsh Baxters Pork Pies From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of james graves Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 20:50 To: wolves wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Two things I miss about England i miss reading the pink on sat night .. Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:35:50 +1000 Subject: [NSWolves] Two things I miss about England From: millward@gmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com My parents and final score on a Saturday afternoon. Brings back so many memories. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13491700.stm -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale [sec=unclassified]
Ward and Jarvis will stay put, unless there is big money on the table for Jarvis in particular. The rest should go. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:50 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale I think the following players need to be removed from the 1st team (if not the 25 man squad): Berra Craddock Elokobi Ward Henry Jarvis? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:46 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale Has it been made public MM has money to spend ? If so, how much ? I think we need to clear out: Berra, Steerman, Jones, Henry and Jarvis. And get in: O'Hara, 2 decent centre backs (I didn't think Mancienne was bad, and noticed he's back in the England U21 squad), and another O'Hara type midfielder. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Moxey and Morgan will not break their current wage structure, so no chance of any of them except O'Hara. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale Harry Redknapp will listen to offers for up to 14 players this summer as he looks to slash the wage bill at Tottenham Hotspur http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/tottenham-hotspur and pave the way for impact signings. The manager is prepared to sell the goalkeeper Heurelho Gomes and either Roman Pavlyuchenko or Jermain Defoe, and a host of fringe players. They are Ben Alnwick, Alan Hutton, Kyle Naughton, Sébastien Bassong, David Bentley, Jermaine Jenas, Wilson Palacios, Niko Kranjcar, Jamie O'Hara, Giovani dos Santos and Robbie Keane. Are there any in this list (O'Hara aside) who we would like to see at Wolves and if so do you think we have a realistic chance of getting any of them? The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]
I think Mick is staying, as you say Steve, he would have gone by now if he was going... The thing is, his heart is in the right place but his brain isn't. We could get a much better manager, of that there is no doubt but none as likeable or as passionate as Mick. Our near neighbours stole the march on us...Woy as weally weally done well, and they will consolidate now. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 08:07 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Wolves won't hire Hughton because he is black. If we were to change manager I'd hope for someone with Premier League experience. O'Neill, and Sam are the only two that are currently out of work but I think it's unlikely we'd get either of them. They both rely on having money to spend too. In fact the pool of managers that have done well in the Premiership with little money is very small. We could always follow the Wolves tradition of having ex-England mangers...You know who I mean. It's purely for fun anyway. I can't see Morgan sacking Mick. We were in the bottom three most of the season and he didn't get rid. It's funny how football management is a job that everyone thinks is easy and that they could do. It's not the same with anyone else's job is it? On 23 May 2011 18:58, stephen nott sjn...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, Chris Houghton would be the man of choice but will probabley go to West Ham, the fact that we were so close to the drop should be reason enough to sack Mick, i hear Brum need a good coech, cheers ,Steve From: pcr...@contechengineering.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:09 +1000 Mick is a good Manager, the best the Wolves have had since John Barnwell. Is he the best man to take us to the next level? I hope so but personally do not think he is up to it. This season he has at times made some fundamental mistakes, weird team selections and substitutions in my opinion. His faith in Henry is blinkered and the most obvious fundamental mistake for me, no disrespect to him but he should not be playing Central Midfield for a Premier league team! Don't like to keep on harping about Left back but we do not have one and it has cost us dear this season. When Van Damme left we should have had someone lined up to replace him during the January transfer window, obvious to everyone except MM. Baffling decision and it nearly cost us dear, Elokobi has given away countless goals through poor defending this second half of the season and cost us points. Sorry Steve, he is a very decent chap and I have been a big supporter of his in the past but he lost me early in the New Year. Time for a change, there is a better alternative available. Martin O'Neill would be my choice followed by Chris Houghton. Also, why not try and poach Phelan from Manure, worth a call? All this is hypothetical though Steve, MM is going nowhere until Xmas at the earliest. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:48 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats But you do support him? Would you join me in agreeing that he is an excellent manager? On 23 May 2011 15:24, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Where support is justified I shall provide my support. Until then I shall perform the role of silent subscriber on this list. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:20 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Only seven more points needed. Cut out some silly late points lost and we'd be there. WBA away for example. Marcus, you've been very quiet today. May I remind you that under the terms of the bet: Marcus must publicly support Mick On 23 May 2011 11:00, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: Morgan wants to finish in the top 10 next season. Did the commentators
RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]
The Revolution? Get him in now! The team will be coming out to Billy Bragg and we'll all be happy. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 08:16 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Although I think Rog would like Hughton. He apparently used to write a column for the Workers Revolutionary Party's newspaper News Line. On 24 May 2011 08:07, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Wolves won't hire Hughton because he is black. If we were to change manager I'd hope for someone with Premier League experience. O'Neill, and Sam are the only two that are currently out of work but I think it's unlikely we'd get either of them. They both rely on having money to spend too. In fact the pool of managers that have done well in the Premiership with little money is very small. We could always follow the Wolves tradition of having ex-England mangers...You know who I mean. It's purely for fun anyway. I can't see Morgan sacking Mick. We were in the bottom three most of the season and he didn't get rid. It's funny how football management is a job that everyone thinks is easy and that they could do. It's not the same with anyone else's job is it? On 23 May 2011 18:58, stephen nott sjn...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, Chris Houghton would be the man of choice but will probabley go to West Ham, the fact that we were so close to the drop should be reason enough to sack Mick, i hear Brum need a good coech, cheers ,Steve From: pcr...@contechengineering.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:09 +1000 Mick is a good Manager, the best the Wolves have had since John Barnwell. Is he the best man to take us to the next level? I hope so but personally do not think he is up to it. This season he has at times made some fundamental mistakes, weird team selections and substitutions in my opinion. His faith in Henry is blinkered and the most obvious fundamental mistake for me, no disrespect to him but he should not be playing Central Midfield for a Premier league team! Don't like to keep on harping about Left back but we do not have one and it has cost us dear this season. When Van Damme left we should have had someone lined up to replace him during the January transfer window, obvious to everyone except MM. Baffling decision and it nearly cost us dear, Elokobi has given away countless goals through poor defending this second half of the season and cost us points. Sorry Steve, he is a very decent chap and I have been a big supporter of his in the past but he lost me early in the New Year. Time for a change, there is a better alternative available. Martin O'Neill would be my choice followed by Chris Houghton. Also, why not try and poach Phelan from Manure, worth a call? All this is hypothetical though Steve, MM is going nowhere until Xmas at the earliest. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:48 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats But you do support him? Would you join me in agreeing that he is an excellent manager? On 23 May 2011 15:24, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Where support is justified I shall provide my support. Until then I shall perform the role of silent subscriber on this list. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:20 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Only seven more points needed. Cut out some silly late points lost and
RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]
You want a bet on next season already. Thats like putting money of the Melbourne Cup before you know who is running. Early reports suggest O'Hara is going to be signed along with other positions being addressed. If we get the players we want, I am confidant we can do much better, the problem as been enticing good players to Wolverhampton though...maybe our survival will make the better players see stability at last. Henry to QPR...lets start the revolution. Quality leftback Talk of Johnson from Blues It is a season to be merrythe off season Off to the UK to purchase my swanky new Wolves top on Thursday. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 09:39 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] I know it seems that I am stubbornly in favour of Mick and won't listen to anything said against him. I have been trying to put myself in the other camp for the last few days but I keep coming back to these points: * He is the best manager we've had for some time, at least in terms of the success he's brought the club. * With the side we have I think he's about on par. Could another manager punch further above our current weight? Possibly, but I think it's unsustainable in the long term. Roy will be an intersting one to watch next season. * We still have a side that is 50% the same as the one that won the championship. It's hard to argue that the team should be doing better on those grounds * I also think Mick gets more out of the team than they actually have in terms of quality. The team seem to like him very much. * We've beaten some very good teams. The number we have beaten makes it very hard to put down to fluke. I think we have looked really good at times. * Despite appearing to make bad decisions in selection, I have to assume that he knows more about it than anyone else. This next season is probably do or die though. I assume that we'll buy O'Hara plus a couple of other players, such as a left back and a central defender. That will remove some more of the championship team. It wil still be a low wage side though Lee do you fancy a bet on the position of Wolves and Albion next season? Same consequences as my bet with Marcus this season. I bet that Wolves will finish above Albion. On 24 May 2011 08:17, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I think Mick is staying, as you say Steve, he would have gone by now if he was going... The thing is, his heart is in the right place but his brain isn't. We could get a much better manager, of that there is no doubt but none as likeable or as passionate as Mick. Our near neighbours stole the march on us...Woy as weally weally done well, and they will consolidate now. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 08:07 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Wolves won't hire Hughton because he is black. If we were to change manager I'd hope for someone with Premier League experience. O'Neill, and Sam are the only two that are currently out of work but I think it's unlikely we'd get either of them. They both rely on having money to spend too. In fact the pool of managers that have done well in the Premiership with little money is very small. We could always follow the Wolves tradition of having ex-England mangers...You know who I mean. It's purely for fun anyway. I can't see Morgan sacking Mick. We were in the bottom three most of the season and he didn't get rid. It's funny how football management is a job that everyone thinks is easy and that they could do. It's not the same with anyone else's job is it? On 23 May 2011 18:58, stephen nott sjn...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, Chris Houghton would be the man of choice but will probabley go to West Ham, the fact that we were so close to the drop should be reason enough to sack Mick, i hear Brum need a good coech, cheers ,Steve From: pcr...@contechengineering.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:09 +1000 Mick is a good Manager, the best the Wolves have had since John Barnwell. Is he the best man to take us to the next level? I hope so but personally do not think he is up to it. This season he has at times made some
RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]
I know you probably don't think so Steve, but even I am more optimistic about the future, even with McCarthy at the helm. It is quite possible that the next level of spending is about to be unleashed to. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] Interesting idea. A couple of loan or bosman signings might be the way to go now to give us that kick start to another level without big capital outlay. We should be able to get some better players than Mancienne in on loan. Lescott from City? Most other clubs do it. We've tended to get the young and hungry players from the fringes rather than those that are towards the end of their career and that might be time to change now. I still can hardly believe we stayed up. It looked bleak for much of last season. On 24 May 2011 10:18, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I wish Morgan could use his influence/business relationship to get Michael Owen to come to us. The guy is off contract and is a natural goalscorer (maybe he could teach Doyle how to find the net). Watching him on Sunday for United highlighted how good a player he still is - movement, pace, dragging defenders all over the place. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:15 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] Agreed. We just need some quality now. I don't mean a Rory Delap type player, where our whole game revolves around lonmg throw ins, or balls..I mean some real creativity along with decisive defending. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:04 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] We were playing some old Wolves DVDs on the weekend, and on one was a match from the Championship against Watford pre-MM. It was sobering to be reminded how bad wee were back then compared to now, and far MM has really bought us. The need for tough tackling midfielders ? For creative midfielders ? For goal scorers ? For a manager capable of getting us into the PL / And for keeping us there ? MM got us there, and has kept us there 2 seasons running, on a shoestring budget. Remember all the fans constantly moaning there wasnt enough commitment, passion and desire to win ? 'Wasters' ? MM clearly has turned that one around and deserves full credit for it. On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: I know it seems that I am stubbornly in favour of Mick and won't listen to anything said against him. I have been trying to put myself in the other camp for the last few days but I keep coming back to these points: * He is the best manager we've had for some time, at least in terms of the success he's brought the club. * With the side we have I think he's about on par. Could another manager punch further above our current weight? Possibly, but I think it's unsustainable in the long term. Roy will be an intersting one to watch next season. * We still have a side that is 50% the same as the one that won the championship. It's hard to argue that the team should be doing better on those grounds * I also think Mick gets more out of the team than they actually have in terms of quality. The team seem to like him very much. * We've beaten some very good teams. The number we have beaten makes it very hard to put down to fluke. I think we have looked really good at times. * Despite appearing to make bad decisions in selection, I have to assume that he knows more about it than anyone else. This next season is probably do or die though. I assume that we'll buy O'Hara plus a couple of other players, such as a left back and a central defender. That will remove some more of the championship team. It wil still be a low wage side though Lee do you fancy a bet on the position of Wolves and Albion next season? Same consequences as my bet with Marcus this season. I bet that Wolves will finish above Albion. On 24 May 2011 08:17, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I think Mick is staying, as you say Steve, he would have gone by now if he was going... The thing is, his heart is in the right place but his
RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]
There are some quality players available based on that principle Mark. Scott Parker - West Ham Charlie Adam - Blackpool Johnson - Blues Many many more From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:42 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] MM should be targetting the player who wont want to stay at the relegated clubs. But Im sure he knows that, as thats how we got Doyle, Hunt, Hahneman, etc. On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I know you probably don't think so Steve, but even I am more optimistic about the future, even with McCarthy at the helm. It is quite possible that the next level of spending is about to be unleashed to. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] Interesting idea. A couple of loan or bosman signings might be the way to go now to give us that kick start to another level without big capital outlay. We should be able to get some better players than Mancienne in on loan. Lescott from City? Most other clubs do it. We've tended to get the young and hungry players from the fringes rather than those that are towards the end of their career and that might be time to change now. I still can hardly believe we stayed up. It looked bleak for much of last season. On 24 May 2011 10:18, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I wish Morgan could use his influence/business relationship to get Michael Owen to come to us. The guy is off contract and is a natural goalscorer (maybe he could teach Doyle how to find the net). Watching him on Sunday for United highlighted how good a player he still is - movement, pace, dragging defenders all over the place. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:15 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] Agreed. We just need some quality now. I don't mean a Rory Delap type player, where our whole game revolves around lonmg throw ins, or balls..I mean some real creativity along with decisive defending. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:04 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified] We were playing some old Wolves DVDs on the weekend, and on one was a match from the Championship against Watford pre-MM. It was sobering to be reminded how bad wee were back then compared to now, and far MM has really bought us. The need for tough tackling midfielders ? For creative midfielders ? For goal scorers ? For a manager capable of getting us into the PL / And for keeping us there ? MM got us there, and has kept us there 2 seasons running, on a shoestring budget. Remember all the fans constantly moaning there wasnt enough commitment, passion and desire to win ? 'Wasters' ? MM clearly has turned that one around and deserves full credit for it. On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: I know it seems that I am stubbornly in favour of Mick and won't listen to anything said against him. I have been trying to put myself in the other camp for the last few days but I keep coming back to these points: * He is the best manager we've had for some time, at least in terms of the success he's brought the club. * With the side we have I think he's about on par. Could another manager punch further above our current weight? Possibly, but I think it's unsustainable in the long term. Roy will be an intersting one to watch next season. * We still have a side that is 50% the same as the one that won the championship. It's hard to argue that the team should be doing better on those grounds * I also think Mick gets more out of the team than they actually have in terms of quality. The team seem
RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]
You are joking Steve? We were very very fortunate. That game showed all our inadequencies...wake up call if ever I have seen one...Henry put in the worst captains performance ever...but it wasn't just him. Hope the look of despair and then relief on Morgans face means hand in pocket for O'Neil. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 05:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick Suck it up Princess. Let's start hearing the love for Mick. On 23 May 2011 01:54, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Looks like I won't have to bother singing Mick's praises in the Championship next season. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]
Never been so deflated after such a huge win. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 07:16 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] You are joking Steve? We were very very fortunate. That game showed all our inadequencies...wake up call if ever I have seen one...Henry put in the worst captains performance ever...but it wasn't just him. Hope the look of despair and then relief on Morgans face means hand in pocket for O'Neil. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 05:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick Suck it up Princess. Let's start hearing the love for Mick. On 23 May 2011 01:54, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Looks like I won't have to bother singing Mick's praises in the Championship next season. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager -- Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches [sec=unclassified]
So whats the go?, is the game on viewers choice? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Friday, 20 May 2011 08:09 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches we're just scraping 5th in the voting this morning. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 11:35 PM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches I'm pretty sure I saw an advert last Saturday night for Wolves v Blackburn on Foxtel in the half time break. From: jpar...@munichre.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:31:40 +1000 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] TV Matches I thought that was going to haappen on Dec 21st 2012? Or is that only the Mayan doomsday? From: Rog Reet [mailto:rognr...@exemail.com.au] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 05:13 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches Don't worry about what matches are scheduled to be shown on Monday. None of it's going to happen as Saturday is World Rapture Day. The earth's going to be destroyed by something called a Loving God. I'm going to celebrate big time on Saturday, no more useless Mick. Was looking forward to Marcus praising the hopeless plonker next season though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:39 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] TV Matches Idiots. Looks like they'll be showing Villa v Liverpool and Bolton v Man City from the voting. 2 matches that dont mean anything to relegation, just because of the volume of fans. They could easily just show the relegation matches + ManUtd (anyway). btw, If they are recording IPs, just try voting from a different machine or connection (e.g. mobile, laptop, etc). On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I just did the same to most of my address book. We've got a lot of ground to make up to make it the main game but we're giving it a late go!! Voting closes tomorrow at lunchtime. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:03 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches Have sent it out to around 30 clients and asked that they pass it on. Jim From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:01 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches Yes I've been voting non-stop for the past 10 minutes but the numbers haven't changed so they must have something setup to prevent multiple votes. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:54 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] TV Matches I just got 3 of my lot to vote 3 times each. They usually set those things to record IP addresses to prevent duplicate voting. On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Just voted 3 x times and we have stayed at 11.4%. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:42 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches Importance: High If any of you are still on the worldwide Wolves list or MolMix can you please post this link and get everyone to vote for our match: http://www.foxsports.com.au/football/premier-league/foxsportscomau-gives -users-the-chance-to-vote-on-which-barclays-premier-league-matches-to-br oadcast/story-e6frf4a3-1226056393366 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:39 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] TV Matches Importance: High Guys, Everyone needs to go to foxsports.com.au and vote for our match to be shown on Sunday. As there are too many matches for multi-view, they are taking votes for the matches to be shown so get everybody that you know to go online and vote for our match PLEASE!!! Cheers, Marcus The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
[NSWolves] Progress [sec=unclassified]
I've changed the title because it would have been too long with my extra bit added. Anyway, Morgan seems to be working on the small step theory, which totally baffles me because he's just about to spend a fortune on a stadium which will be half full if the small step we made this year isn't enough??? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 09:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated. Maybe thats based on Morgan only planning on putting in small amounts of money each year, and measuring MM on what he achieved with it ? He wont get a big name manager in as they will expect lots of money to spend, which he obviously doesnt want to pay. On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: What worries me is that Morgan has stated that Mick has made progress every year since he took over but when you look at how he's measured that it is the context of very small fractions or single points, so based on that run rate Morgan will be 100 years old before he sees us getting anywhere near the top of the table (assuming everyone else stays stagnant for that entire period). Why can't Morgan accept that Mick has reached the limit of his ability and take the plunge. 5 years is long enough in most roles. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 9:00 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated. Good to see we're both on the ball Mark. I just posted a link to the same story on ESPN. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 8:55 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13440664.stm -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
So better odds putting on individual bets? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2011 09:36 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] For us to go down, two of the teams below us have to win, Blackburn either draw or win. Odds for, Blackburn win $3.90, draw $3.00 (Can't remember a draw being so low) Brum win $6.50 Blackpool win $5.50 Wigan win $2.38 6 bets covers all combinations. Minimum single win, $39+ Maximum single win $139+ Minimum three wins $192+ Maximum 3 wins $250+ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:35 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Down to $7.50 here now. Still worth a go I reckon On 16 May 2011 17:43, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: If I was a Blackburn fan I might look at it like this: * We've only won three away all season. * We haven't won away since 2010. * We've let in more goals on the road than any other team in the league * We've had an awful season, sacking a proven manager and replacing him with a muppet * Samba is injured * Or as one Blackburn fan says: Actually, this is a must win game. Can we win it? Very very unlikely. The die was cast in December as i've said before. The club is disastrously managed at all levels now and the outcome is inevitable. * BUT we are playing Wolves! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:58 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] If I was a Blackburn fan I might look at it like this: * We've only won three away all season. * We haven't won away since 2010. * We've let in more goals on the road than any other team in the league * We're playing a resurgent team who've won two in a row, scoring three goals in each. * We've had an awful season, sacking a proven manager and replacing him with a muppet * Samba is injured * Or as one Blackburn fan says: Actually, this is a must win game. Can we win it? Very very unlikely. The die was cast in December as i've said before. The club is disastrously managed at all levels now and the outcome is inevitable. See, the sh1te coloured glasses work for everyone. It's more a reflection of being a football fan than it is about Wolves ability. On 16 May 2011 10:15, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Look at it this way, if you were a Blackburn fan, we would be one of the teams you would want to play. There's going to be a surprsie somewhere, its happened all year. If all the results go according to the table we will be fine whatever happens against Blackburn, because all those around us SHOULD loose as well. It doesn't work like that thoughjust as well we've won our last two though isn't it? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Out of Light, Cometh Darkness. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and distinguished record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or improving their disastrous away records. Just because they are struggling doesn't mean we don't have it in us to capitulate. We haven't won 3 matches in a row since April 2009 (in the Championship, not the Premier League). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Such negativity * Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the Europa * Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours. 4 losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. * Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT. They haven't lost there all season. They might play their second string but their 25 man squad is superb. I don't think the argument of caring about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. * Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last three. Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. * I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn * Odds of three wins in a row are small
RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]
If all goes well I'll be sending Steve Morgan a nice little letter explaining why he should bite the bullet and pay good money for Martin O'Neil. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:50 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Depending on how it's going you can start to get yourself in a mindset to publicly supprt Mick as a manager, and think of some lovely things to say about him. I shall be expecting you to gush on Monday morning if all goes well. :D On 17 May 2011 09:12, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: There is no way in the world that I'm going to bed before I know the results. I'm just waiting to see which games they put on viewers choice. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:07 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Not sure what else he could say really. The only alternative would be We'll be down by next Sunday - and it's all my fault I would love it if we beat them and sent them down. Loovvv ttt. There were some rumours that Arry doesn't want to get into the Europa as he wants toget top 4 in the league next season. However, they would qualify even if they lose through Fair Play, although that would mean more qualifaciton games in the summer. Is anyone getting up to watch it unfold live, or are you all risking that log onto the BBC website next Monday morning? On 17 May 2011 08:39, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: http://www.sport.co.uk/news/Football/53540/This_time_next_Sunday_well_be_safe_-_Kean.aspx Marcus Chantry Associate Director ½ Senior Product Manager ½ Macquarie Life Banking and Financial Services Group ½ Macquarie Group Limited ½ 1 Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000 T 02 8232 4259½ M 0448 887 627 ½ marcus.chan...@macquarie.com http://www.macquarie.com.au/mgl/au/advisers/campaigns/fivestars The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. image001.jpg
RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]
He should be listening to all fans, because to put it plain and simple we are not going anywhere while Macarthy is in charge of the team. You can't tell me, anyone is happy going through this hell every year? Quite frankly we are lucky to be still in the mix. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 11:20 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] I'm sure a successful businessman like Morgan will be strongly influenced by the opinion of some bloke from Australia that he's never heard of. On 17 May 2011 10:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: If all goes well I'll be sending Steve Morgan a nice little letter explaining why he should bite the bullet and pay good money for Martin O'Neil. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:50 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Depending on how it's going you can start to get yourself in a mindset to publicly supprt Mick as a manager, and think of some lovely things to say about him. I shall be expecting you to gush on Monday morning if all goes well. :D On 17 May 2011 09:12, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: There is no way in the world that I'm going to bed before I know the results. I'm just waiting to see which games they put on viewers choice. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:07 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Not sure what else he could say really. The only alternative would be We'll be down by next Sunday - and it's all my fault I would love it if we beat them and sent them down. Loovvv ttt. There were some rumours that Arry doesn't want to get into the Europa as he wants toget top 4 in the league next season. However, they would qualify even if they lose through Fair Play, although that would mean more qualifaciton games in the summer. Is anyone getting up to watch it unfold live, or are you all risking that log onto the BBC website next Monday morning? On 17 May 2011 08:39, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: http://www.sport.co.uk/news/Football/53540/This_time_next_Sunday_well_be_safe_-_Kean.aspx Marcus Chantry Associate Director ½ Senior Product Manager ½ Macquarie Life Banking and Financial Services Group ½ Macquarie Group Limited ½ 1 Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000 T 02 8232 4259½ M 0448 887 627 ½ marcus.chan...@macquarie.com http://www.macquarie.com.au/mgl/au/advisers/campaigns/fivestars The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door
RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]
I'm not so easily satisfied. At times we have been absolutely terrible this year, and certainly no better than last. . I can't explain how we have done well against the top teams, yet crumble so badly against poorer opposition. I hope come 3am on Monday morning the few big wins have been enough, because its the losses against lower teams that have cost us.. Macarthy failed to patch up the side sufficiently pre season, we all new our defence wasn't up to the task, and that has proved the case time and again. Its taken him until we were absolutely desperate for results to make changes that have worked (Bringing Fletcher in, dropping Berra)..and god knows what he'll do on Sunday now Doyle is fit?? He's a nice Guy and its natural to have some loyalty towards a man who got us promoted and kept us up, but I just don't see too much on field progress. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 12:48 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] It's been the most enjoyable footballing season of my life. We've beaten some good teams, played some nice stuff, seen a lot of rubbish and have had a very exciting relegation battle. There's no chance of an acheivement at the top end of the table so we might as well have some fun at the bottom. We're only a few points of being a mid table team. I'ts been very tight this year. A few errors that cost us points have made the difference but with a few new players next season we have the makings of a good side. You can't blame Mick for Zubar's silly backpass for example. I think the team has progressed. Most other seasons we'd have been safe by now. I come back to the debate of manager vs players. Is Mick really to blame? If he's so bad at picking a team how come we beat so many big teams? On 17 May 2011 11:22, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: He should be listening to all fans, because to put it plain and simple we are not going anywhere while Macarthy is in charge of the team. You can't tell me, anyone is happy going through this hell every year? Quite frankly we are lucky to be still in the mix. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 11:20 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] I'm sure a successful businessman like Morgan will be strongly influenced by the opinion of some bloke from Australia that he's never heard of. On 17 May 2011 10:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: If all goes well I'll be sending Steve Morgan a nice little letter explaining why he should bite the bullet and pay good money for Martin O'Neil. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:50 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Depending on how it's going you can start to get yourself in a mindset to publicly supprt Mick as a manager, and think of some lovely things to say about him. I shall be expecting you to gush on Monday morning if all goes well. :D On 17 May 2011 09:12, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: There is no way in the world that I'm going to bed before I know the results. I'm just waiting to see which games they put on viewers choice. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:07 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Not sure what else he could say really. The only alternative would be We'll be down by next Sunday - and it's all my fault I would love it if we beat them and sent them down. Loovvv ttt. There were some rumours that Arry doesn't want to get into the Europa as he wants toget top 4 in the league next season. However, they would qualify even if they lose through Fair Play, although that would mean more qualifaciton games in the summer
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for. $100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Bet William Hill have us at $9 to go down. What time do they open the book again in Australia? Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on offer here. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
I disagree, I think we are in a very worrying situation. Blackburn will be just as hungry as us, and they aren't that bad a teamask Rog how they ripped us apart last year (we had to sit through the worst game ever...although The Hoff scored...), and they did the same earlier this year. I honestly can't see Blackpool beating Man U, and if they draw we'll nip them on goal difference unless Blackburn tonk us..sorry Jeremy. So we just need one of either Wigan or Blues to loose as well.. Its a situation none of us wanted to be in going into the last game of the seasonthe Spurs situation re the Europa does give me some optimism. The saver bet sounds bloody good to me though, if I can get 9/1 I'm on it, although I hear the odds have dropped much lower than that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:23 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] It's a saver. It's a betting term I think that Rog is best to explain. I don't think it will happen but it the stars aligned and it did the 10x return would be some consolation. Only a Wolves fan could seriously fear for our current situation. I wouldn't swap with any of the teams that are still in the mix for relegation. On 16 May 2011 08:37, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: How can you complain about such negativity when it was you who suggested having a punt on us to get relegated? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Such negativity * Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the Europa * Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours. 4 losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. * Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT. They haven't lost there all season. They might play their second string but their 25 man squad is superb. I don't think the argument of caring about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. * Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last three. Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. * I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn * Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for. $100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Bet William Hill have us at $9 to go down. What time do they open the book again in Australia? Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on offer here. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
Blackburn From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:35 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Which teams around us would you swap places with Lee? On 16 May 2011 09:31, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I disagree, I think we are in a very worrying situation. Blackburn will be just as hungry as us, and they aren't that bad a teamask Rog how they ripped us apart last year (we had to sit through the worst game ever...although The Hoff scored...), and they did the same earlier this year. I honestly can't see Blackpool beating Man U, and if they draw we'll nip them on goal difference unless Blackburn tonk us..sorry Jeremy. So we just need one of either Wigan or Blues to loose as well.. Its a situation none of us wanted to be in going into the last game of the seasonthe Spurs situation re the Europa does give me some optimism. The saver bet sounds bloody good to me though, if I can get 9/1 I'm on it, although I hear the odds have dropped much lower than that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:23 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] It's a saver. It's a betting term I think that Rog is best to explain. I don't think it will happen but it the stars aligned and it did the 10x return would be some consolation. Only a Wolves fan could seriously fear for our current situation. I wouldn't swap with any of the teams that are still in the mix for relegation. On 16 May 2011 08:37, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: How can you complain about such negativity when it was you who suggested having a punt on us to get relegated? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Such negativity * Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the Europa * Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours. 4 losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. * Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT. They haven't lost there all season. They might play their second string but their 25 man squad is superb. I don't think the argument of caring about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. * Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last three. Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. * I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn * Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for. $100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Bet William Hill have us at $9 to go down. What time do they open the book again in Australia? Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on offer here. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
Blackburn From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:35 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Which teams around us would you swap places with Lee? On 16 May 2011 09:31, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I disagree, I think we are in a very worrying situation. Blackburn will be just as hungry as us, and they aren't that bad a teamask Rog how they ripped us apart last year (we had to sit through the worst game ever...although The Hoff scored...), and they did the same earlier this year. I honestly can't see Blackpool beating Man U, and if they draw we'll nip them on goal difference unless Blackburn tonk us..sorry Jeremy. So we just need one of either Wigan or Blues to loose as well.. Its a situation none of us wanted to be in going into the last game of the seasonthe Spurs situation re the Europa does give me some optimism. The saver bet sounds bloody good to me though, if I can get 9/1 I'm on it, although I hear the odds have dropped much lower than that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:23 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] It's a saver. It's a betting term I think that Rog is best to explain. I don't think it will happen but it the stars aligned and it did the 10x return would be some consolation. Only a Wolves fan could seriously fear for our current situation. I wouldn't swap with any of the teams that are still in the mix for relegation. On 16 May 2011 08:37, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: How can you complain about such negativity when it was you who suggested having a punt on us to get relegated? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Such negativity * Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the Europa * Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours. 4 losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. * Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT. They haven't lost there all season. They might play their second string but their 25 man squad is superb. I don't think the argument of caring about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. * Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last three. Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. * I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn * Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for. $100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Bet William Hill have us at $9 to go down. What time do they open the book again in Australia? Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on offer here. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
I'm going to get me some. Woolworths have stopped selling it in Queensland though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:37 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Marcus, Black is the key superstitious word for me at the moment. I have been buying Black Pudding from an English Butcher in Lakemba these last few weeks and was talking with my Dad last night who has also been eating Black Pudding lately as well. We are both buying Black Puddings again this week so there is nothing to worry about! Lucky Underpants, Wolves shirt, Rosary and scarf on TV + Black Pudding = Happy Days!!! 3 - 1 to the Wolves again with Fletcher bagging 2! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:13 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] We definitely got the light from the Stadium of Light. What are we going to get from the Black Country? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Out of Light, Cometh Darkness. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and distinguished record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or improving their disastrous away records. Just because they are struggling doesn't mean we don't have it in us to capitulate. We haven't won 3 matches in a row since April 2009 (in the Championship, not the Premier League). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Such negativity * Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the Europa * Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours. 4 losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. * Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT. They haven't lost there all season. They might play their second string but their 25 man squad is superb. I don't think the argument of caring about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. * Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last three. Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. * I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn * Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for. $100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Bet William Hill have us at $9 to go down. What time do they open the book again in Australia? Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on offer here. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
If there's one thing Wolves do well, its end a team's dodgy run...we are top of the league in that.. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:58 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] If I was a Blackburn fan I might look at it like this: * We've only won three away all season. * We haven't won away since 2010. * We've let in more goals on the road than any other team in the league * We're playing a resurgent team who've won two in a row, scoring three goals in each. * We've had an awful season, sacking a proven manager and replacing him with a muppet * Samba is injured * Or as one Blackburn fan says: Actually, this is a must win game. Can we win it? Very very unlikely. The die was cast in December as i've said before. The club is disastrously managed at all levels now and the outcome is inevitable. See, the sh1te coloured glasses work for everyone. It's more a reflection of being a football fan than it is about Wolves ability. On 16 May 2011 10:15, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Look at it this way, if you were a Blackburn fan, we would be one of the teams you would want to play. There's going to be a surprsie somewhere, its happened all year. If all the results go according to the table we will be fine whatever happens against Blackburn, because all those around us SHOULD loose as well. It doesn't work like that thoughjust as well we've won our last two though isn't it? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Out of Light, Cometh Darkness. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and distinguished record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or improving their disastrous away records. Just because they are struggling doesn't mean we don't have it in us to capitulate. We haven't won 3 matches in a row since April 2009 (in the Championship, not the Premier League). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified] Such negativity * Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the Europa * Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours. 4 losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. * Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT. They haven't lost there all season. They might play their second string but their 25 man squad is superb. I don't think the argument of caring about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. * Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last three. Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. * I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn * Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for. $100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58 To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Bet William Hill have us at $9 to go down. What time do they open the book again in Australia? Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on offer here. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves
[NSWolves] The Final Hurdle [sec=unclassified]
Just looking at the remaining fixtures for all the teams in the relegation fight. The current points are Blackburn 39 - If they loose to Man U on Saturday, and us Blackpool and Wigan win they could need to beat us to survive, Birminghham 39 - Still have to paly Spurs and Fulham, both could go either way, but i think they may need a point Wolves 37 - Blackpool 36 - Two tough games against Bolton and man U, I think they are gone Wigan 36 - West Ham and Stoke, again games that could go either way but I think they are gone West Ham 33 - Two very winnable games against Wigan and Sunderland worries me Out of the six teams in the dog fight Blackburn and Blackpool both have to face Man U, so lets assume they have a maximum of three points available to them (although both could possibly take points off Man U). My choice for the drop simply because I don't think either will beat Man U. West Ham have to win this weekend to survive, if they do beat Wigan, I think we will have to beat Sunderland or Blackburn to stay up. In other words, we definately need one more win or two draws to stay up, and I hope its this weekend, because the last day fixtures fill me with dread. So, Blackpool and Wigan for the drop, with the last spot between West Ham, Blackburn and Us. Serious pressure. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion [sec=unclassified]
I am not taking anything whatsover away from the performance, particularly in the first half. HOWEVER, the scoreline doesn't tell the true story of the whole game. We were very very lucky at times in the secomd half. We need one of those Odenwatsits badly. Fletcher had a bliner and has won over quite a number of people with that performance. Hunt really got in there faces, he'd be an annoying little bugga to play against. Guideora always puts in a good shift and definately gave them something to think about. When the team sheet came out I was gobsmacked that both Jarvis and Milijas were on tghe bench, but for once Mad Mick's tactics worked...JUST. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 9 May 2011 10:26 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion I went to bed at half time as I have a stinking cold. It was an excellent first half performance, from an odd team selection. Where have these performances been the last month? Fletcher, Guediora and Hunt were excellent. Hunt chased everything. Fletcher is a good footballer in lots of ways. One win now should be enough. We might get away with not needing much else anyway Blackpool have Bolton and Manure Wigan have Stoke and West Ham West Ham have Sunderland and Wigan (come on West Ham) On 9 May 2011 09:42, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: You're psychic Paul ! On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, paul pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote: Cometh the hour cometh the man. Fletcher to score 2, Wolves to win 3 - 1! Out of Darkness Cometh Light! --Original Message-- To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion Sent: 2 May 2011 17:44 Jeremy, I was at Mass on Sunday, my prayers are not being answered. I even generously contributed twice to the collections. I will ask Father Brian if he can help. --Original Message-- From: Jeremy Tonks Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion Sent: 2 May 2011 17:32 Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk directly yourself!! Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but (but had publicly hoped for). It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and Blackpool to survival. A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only need a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them promoted. Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated. Wolves...? Glad I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in recent weeks. From:nswolves@googlegroups.com mailto:from%3answol...@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally inept and impotent performance! I admire some of your continued optimism but my rose coloured glasses now lie smashed on the floor. Time to wake up to the reality that we are going down, only a miracle can save us! Over to you Jeremy! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From:nswolves@googlegroups.com mailto:from%3answol...@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:09 PM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion Has he ever taken off Henry? I don't think I've ever seen him subbed. Would like to have seen Henry subbed by Guedioura on 65 mins last night. Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:25:57 +1000 Subject: [NSWolves] Team for Albion From: millward@gmail.com To:
RE: [NSWolves] Baggies [sec=unclassified]
* Win/lose/draw; WIN * scoreline; 2-1 * heroes = BEER AH to finally unearth all his natural talent villains = All the fans who doubted the sublime footballing skills of Karp Henry * staying up/going down; Staying up if we win. Down if we loose. * good crowd/bad crowd; Very good, no motivation needed for this one. * Mick making a substitution before the 80th minute Not unless BEER AH gets sent off for holding * Etc, etc, etc The one game I view with trepedation, and I'm dreading it even more this time for obvious reasons. So based on my assumptions relating to the religous banter that as taken place this week, if Rog wins a fortune on Saturday afternoon, Wolves are fookin doomed...meaning, not even the great Macarthy can save us atheists from championship football. It's crunch time gentlemen... let's get excited!!! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] RE: Baggies [sec=unclassified]
Is it a Sunday game From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 12:13 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] RE: Baggies I would suggest a get together to watch it (9pm Sunday), but don't want you guys to see me cry. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 12:05 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Baggies Has anyone noticed that our fixture list has us playing against our BIGGEST and most HATED rivals this weekend, in a game that is likely to decide whether or not we are a Premier League team next season?? With no disrespect intended to our members who are intrigued by or wedded to any given religious faction, I'm keen to hear what people actually think is going to happen on Sunday? * Win/lose/draw; * scoreline; * heroes/villains; * staying up/going down; * good crowd/bad crowd; * Mick making a substitution before the 80th minute * Etc, etc, etc It's crunch time gentlemen... let's get excited!!! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt...[sec=unclassified]
No, lets get back to politics and religionOsama on the left wing, Usama on the rightdeadly combination. Hamill for PM From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 4 May 2011 11:24 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt... Let's hope it doesn't go to his head like it did with Jarvis On 4 May 2011 11:21, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: but did anyone notice Hammill got named in the England U21s ? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13273721.stm -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion [sec=unclassified]
I must be the only one who thinks O'Hara as done very little since scoring the goal against Albion. Is David Jones fit? I'd prefer him. Hamill seems to do ok everytime I've seen him, why did Mick drop him in the first place? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 09:21 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion Henessey- FoleyMancienneCraddockElokobi Hammill---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis -Fletcher Whens E-Blake fit again ? On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: My choice: Henessey- FoleyStearmanCraddockGeorge Hunt---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis -Fletcher Chance of it being picked: 0% -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion [sec=unclassified]
Right now I'm much more worried about the many millions of lunatic followers Osama Bin Laden has left behind to cause death and destruction. What is Gods purpose in all of that nonsense? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 13:38 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion I'm happy to be corrected but I would suspect that the vast majority of those 2 million children would not be part of a Christian society/nation, so the God of which Jeremy speaks is unlikely to help them. That's not to say that they don't have their own 'spiritual' leader/icon that may or may not have let them down. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 1:18 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion Still, it seems a trifle unfair that two million children worldwide are forced to work as prostitutes and barely know anything else, when God could end it all with a wave of the wand. I'm sure even if they knew about Jesus, it would be of little comfort whilst they are getting beaten and sodomized. On 3 May 2011 13:00, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: I may get to a longer response... but probably not... The standard argument goes something like: If God is all powerful and all loving how come there is suffering in the world? The basic premise is flawed from my point of view. I'd respond something like: If God is all powerful and all loving and there is suffering in the world then God must have an important purpose involving suffering. As in all theological discussions Jesus needs be kept at the centre - and there he is as soon you raise the issue of suffering. God's purposes in creation are centred on Jesus. Jesus' own suffering, death and resurrection are the guarantee that, when he returns, death will have no power and suffering will be ended. Forever. There's my briefest theodicy. I can trust God now and into the future because of what Jesus has done in the past. I'll just duck down while you all start shooting... From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 10:17 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion You'd better give us a run down on your views on theodicy then Jeremy. I don't think most of us get it. On 3 May 2011 09:53, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: Your lack of experience in these matters is getting the best of you Rog. You should experiment more. I am convinced that it is very effective (in important matters!). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion If you blokes had spoken to wiser heads on this list you'd have known that praying is just like Mick. A total waste of time as it's guaranteed to achieve all. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 8:12 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion I've been going to mass and my prayers aren't being answered - I think I'll go back to being Anglican! Too cup focussed - and the ^*%*() opposition is too good (but I did beat Chelseadrid yesterday - J J JT From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 7:09 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion You can't let the Wombat's drop down to V. It's only bots and newbies in there. What's gone wrong? On 2 May 2011 17:32, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk directly yourself!! Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but (but had publicly hoped for). It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and Blackpool to survival. A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only need a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them promoted. Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated. Wolves...? Glad I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in recent weeks. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally
RE: [NSWolves] Stoke [sec=unclassified]
We are playing terrible...I can't work out how Doyle's injury can make so much difference. Its all well and good saying we need six points to stay up...but I can't see where the next point is coming from, we drew with Fulham despite them over running is. We are very very bad right nowthe back four are horrendous...fark the positive crap...bring on the points deduction next year after the fans riot when West Brom put the nail in the coffin. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 09:00 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Stoke Come on now chaps. We've had a bad run. We've had good runs. We'll get enough points to stay up. Two wins in the upcoming derbies will be enough. On 27 April 2011 08:11, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 1st goal was a re-run of Everton's 1st the other week. Osman/Pennant down the right with a ball played into our box whereby a six foot something striker (Beckford/Jones) manages to somehow go unnoticed and find himself with space between 2 defenders. Easy header, 1-0. I've not read McCarthy's post match interview but I could pretty much recite it word for word I reckon. Plenty of praise for his players and claims that if we stick together and show the spirit (absent in games, presumably evident in training?) he knows we have, we will stay up. Other teams have to pick up points you know (which is not actually true and won't be necessary the way we're going). Its like watching Sunderland get relegated all over again. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Stoke Going down! MM out! Marcus and Rog were right! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:22 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Stoke Excellent team selection and great performance. We've been really unlucky tonight. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Stoke [sec=unclassified]
Maybe he new we'd all take the piss out of him when he was saying maybe I should have started Milijas instead of Mancienne??? and what the hell as happened to Hamill??? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:49 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Stoke How about when around 2-0 down, MM was talking to TC and covered his mouth with his hand so no-one could lip read what he was saying to TC? Like anyone, such as Stoke, 2-0 up and on top, would care ? Probably discussing their employment prospects. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Wolves boss Mick McCarthy On 27 April 2011 08:11, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 1st goal was a re-run of Everton's 1st the other week. Osman/Pennant down the right with a ball played into our box whereby a six foot something striker (Beckford/Jones) manages to somehow go unnoticed and find himself with space between 2 defenders. Easy header, 1-0. I've not read McCarthy's post match interview but I could pretty much recite it word for word I reckon. Plenty of praise for his players and claims that if we stick together and show the spirit (absent in games, presumably evident in training?) he knows we have, we will stay up. Other teams have to pick up points you know (which is not actually true and won't be necessary the way we're going). Its like watching Sunderland get relegated all over again. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Stoke Going down! MM out! Marcus and Rog were right! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:22 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Stoke Excellent team selection and great performance. We've been really unlucky tonight. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
RE: [NSWolves] Stoke [sec=unclassified]
Unbelievable...well i hope he enjoys his massive pay cut when we get relegated...what a tosser. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:56 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Stoke [sec=unclassified] Apparently Hammill and Mick had a falling out on the training ground. So Mick has dropped him, and the whole team spirit has dropped as a result. But at least Mick has shown him who's boss. They should use this on wikipedia to illustate what cutting off your nose to spite your face means. On 27 April 2011 10:52, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Maybe he new we'd all take the piss out of him when he was saying maybe I should have started Milijas instead of Mancienne??? and what the hell as happened to Hamill??? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:49 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Stoke How about when around 2-0 down, MM was talking to TC and covered his mouth with his hand so no-one could lip read what he was saying to TC? Like anyone, such as Stoke, 2-0 up and on top, would care ? Probably discussing their employment prospects. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Wolves boss Mick McCarthy On 27 April 2011 08:11, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 1st goal was a re-run of Everton's 1st the other week. Osman/Pennant down the right with a ball played into our box whereby a six foot something striker (Beckford/Jones) manages to somehow go unnoticed and find himself with space between 2 defenders. Easy header, 1-0. I've not read McCarthy's post match interview but I could pretty much recite it word for word I reckon. Plenty of praise for his players and claims that if we stick together and show the spirit (absent in games, presumably evident in training?) he knows we have, we will stay up. Other teams have to pick up points you know (which is not actually true and won't be necessary the way we're going). Its like watching Sunderland get relegated all over again. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Stoke Going down! MM out! Marcus and Rog were right! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:22 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Stoke Excellent team selection and great performance. We've been really unlucky tonight. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment
