Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread BradRemedy
Hi Claire We ran MT 8.1 against a Remedy 7.5 environment which worked ok for our custom forms. We ran into a problem with the SRM Application where the questions for SRD's were not getting displayed correctly for our users so we had to switch back to our old mid tier servers. On the plus side we

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread Munukutla, Ravishankar
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** I have checked the compatibility charts… I just want some real world clarification. If I install the Mid-Tier 8.1, I can still run my 7.6.04 Server? Also, if I want the Copy to New functionality… is it just a Mid-Tier upgrade or an AR

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread Sanford, Claire
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Munukutla, Ravishankar Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:50 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** 7604 Server should work fine with 8.1 Mid-tier. Please note that 8.0 Midtier onwards IE7 won’t

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread John Sundberg
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** 7604 Server should work fine with 8.1 Mid-tier. Please note that 8.0 Midtier onwards IE7 won’t work. Yes, one would get performance gain in newer versions of midtier and additional security fixes. Copy to new

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread Rick Cook
your game! *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Munukutla, Ravishankar *Sent:* Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:50 AM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** 7604 Server should work fine

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread Jason Miller
is being courted by SNOW, you better step up your game! *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Munukutla, Ravishankar *Sent:* Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:50 AM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread Reiser, John J
(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Sanford, Claire Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:48 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** Thank you for your input! I finally found last night the one of the answers I was looking for and you

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread Sanford, Claire
) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Reiser, John J Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:44 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** Deep breaths, Claire. It’s just easier to roll your own copy to new since you have control over copying or clearing certain

Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-31 Thread John Sundberg
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New ** Deep breaths, Claire. It’s just easier to roll your own copy to new since you have control over copying or clearing certain fields. I disabled Ctrl-T years ago and only gave the “Copy a Ticket”” button to those

Mid-Tier 8.1 upgrade and Copy to New

2014-07-30 Thread Sanford, Claire
I have checked the compatibility charts… I just want some real world clarification. If I install the Mid-Tier 8.1, I can still run my 7.6.04 Server? Also, if I want the Copy to New functionality… is it just a Mid-Tier upgrade or an AR Server Upgrade as well? Has anyone had any real problems

Re: CMDB and Remedy 8.1 Upgrade

2014-07-15 Thread Mueller, Doug
: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB and Remedy 8.1 Upgrade Greetings everyone. It has been way to long but hopefully I am back for a while. I have a chance at a position in North Texas. This position will be upgrading a 7.6.4 system to 8.1. The system is mostly

CMDB and Remedy 8.1 Upgrade

2014-07-14 Thread Roger Nall
Greetings everyone. It has been way to long but hopefully I am back for a while. I have a chance at a position in North Texas. This position will be upgrading a 7.6.4 system to 8.1. The system is mostly custom but also includes the Asset Management module and CMDB. As someone who has only

Re: CMDB and Remedy 8.1 Upgrade

2014-07-14 Thread Roger Justice
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Mon, Jul 14, 2014 6:16 pm Subject: CMDB and Remedy 8.1 Upgrade Greetings everyone. It has been way to long but hopefully I am back for a while. have a chance at a position in North Texas. This position will be upgrading a .6.4 system to 8.1. The system is mostly custom

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** Who needs documentation when you have wikis that can be updated behind the scenes by conflicting groups of BMC staff with no communications to the customers? Thanks, Shawn Pierson Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer From: Action Request System discussion

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread Zandi
overlays? Fred -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ortega, Jesus A Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:11 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** We just spoke to our support

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** We just spoke to our support organization and they told us Do Not install AR System 8.1.01 if you downloaded it before today. They said that it will corrupt your overlays. We were just about to do it and luckily we did not. BMC apparently is pulling it off

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
AR System Server 8.1.01, not ITSM. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:22 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade Are you talking about

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread Ortega, Jesus A
Of Zandi Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:23 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade This should be old news. The bad one was pulled and the new one is coming our today I think. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 14, 2014, at 5:21 PM, Grooms, Frederick W frederick.w.gro...@xo.com wrote

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread Zandi
- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Zandi Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:23 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade This should be old news. The bad one was pulled and the new one is coming our today I think

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2014-02-14 Thread laurent matheo
o inform my friends in the community that there is a problem and they need to be aware of it. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Zandi Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:23 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re:

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-05 Thread Munukutla,Ravishankar
November 2013 00:06 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** Who needs documentation when you have wikis that can be updated behind the scenes by conflicting groups of BMC staff with no communications to the customers? Thanks, Shawn Pierson Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer From

8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread Saji Philip
I was at the RUG last month and in one of the upgrade sessions I recall a presenter mention that all patches needed be installed before the upgrade. We are on 7.6.04 sp2. Is it best practice to go ahead and install the patches to sp5 (I believe) before the upgrade? Or just upgrade?

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread LJ LongWing
Saji, 'All Patches' is a REALLY vague thing at this moment...are they talking about all Server Patches, Application Patchesand one question that I find questionable about that statementI went from 7.5 directly to 8.1...so I'm not entirely sure how ANY patch in the 7.6 area affects it.

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread Roger Justice
...@gmail.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 12:37 pm Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** Saji, 'All Patches' is a REALLY vague thing at this moment...are they talking about all Server Patches, Application Patchesand one question that I find questionable about that statement

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread LJ LongWing
- From: LJ LongWing lj.longw...@gmail.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 12:37 pm Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** Saji, 'All Patches' is a REALLY vague thing at this moment...are they talking about all Server Patches, Application Patchesand one question that I find

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread Rick Cook
@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 12:37 pm Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** Saji, 'All Patches' is a REALLY vague thing at this moment...are they talking about all Server Patches, Application Patchesand one question that I find questionable about that statementI went from 7.5 directly

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread Roger Justice
It requires more digging on our part unless BMC produces a new compatibility matrix that includes the SP that have new functionality. -Original Message- From: Rick Cook remedyr...@gmail.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 1:15 pm Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** We

Re: 8.1 upgrade

2013-11-04 Thread Pierson, Shawn
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger Justice Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1 upgrade ** It requires more digging on our part unless BMC produces a new compatibility matrix that includes the SP that have new functionality. -Original Message- From: Rick

ITSM 7.6.4 to 8.1 upgrade with overlays storing data

2013-08-13 Thread Pierson, Shawn
Good morning, I am in the process of upgrading my ITSM 7.6.4 system to 8.1, and I read BMC's documentation on dealing with overlays but there is something that I'm not clear on and wanted to come to the list for assistance. I have added five fields to CHG:Infrastructure Change. Three store

Re: ITSM 7.6.4 to 8.1 upgrade with overlays storing data

2013-08-13 Thread Longwing, Lj
Shawn, This gets REALLY complex, really fast...but I'll try to explain as best as I can. Creating a Form overlay does not immediately mean that you loose the visibility on the base items.so, if the only changes you have are 5 custom fields..this is REALLY easy. Upgrade your server to 8.1

Re: ITSM 7.6.4 to 8.1 upgrade with overlays storing data

2013-08-13 Thread Jason Miller
If you get this in the next 7 minutes you can ask BMC. https://communities.bmc.com/community/bmcdn/bmc_it_service_support/blog/2013/08/07/upgrading-to-bmc-remedy-81-things-that-you-really-need-to-know Hopefully they plan on covering this scenario already. Jason On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:29 AM,

SOLVED: ITSM 7.6.4 to 8.1 upgrade with overlays storing data

2013-08-13 Thread Pierson, Shawn
, Shawn Pierson Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, Lj Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:53 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 7.6.4 to 8.1 upgrade with overlays storing data ** Shawn

QBE after 1 character / weirdness after 8.1 upgrade

2013-07-31 Thread Lisa Singh
Has anyone else seen this? The customer field in the HPD:Help Desk form by default has auto complete set Leading after 3 keystroke - same with the Site field in CTM:Location Details. But after the 7.6.04 8.1 upgrade it's now attempting to auto complete after 1 character, which of course brings

Re: QBE after 1 character / weirdness after 8.1 upgrade

2013-07-31 Thread Lucero, Michelle
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: QBE after 1 character / weirdness after 8.1 upgrade Has anyone else seen this? The customer field in the HPD:Help Desk form by default has auto complete set Leading after 3 keystroke - same with the Site field in CTM:Location Details. But after the 7.6.04 8.1 upgrade it's now

Re: QBE after 1 character / weirdness after 8.1 upgrade

2013-07-31 Thread Abhijit Hendre
by default has auto complete set Leading after 3 keystroke - same with the Site field in CTM:Location Details. But after the 7.6.04 8.1 upgrade it's now attempting to auto complete after 1 character, which of course brings up a warning about exceeding the query limits on anything other than X

Re: QBE after 1 character / weirdness after 8.1 upgrade

2013-07-31 Thread Lisa Singh
Oh thank you! That's great to know. Very helpful! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years

windows server 8.1 upgrade from 8.0

2013-03-04 Thread Daniel Bloom
Anybody run into the AI upgrade complaining something else is using the directory, and if so what processes and how did you stop them? (handle says nothing). Thanks Daniel ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives

Re: windows server 8.1 upgrade from 8.0

2013-03-04 Thread laurent matheo
** I just tried to upgrade from 8.0 patch 002 to 8.1 GA on a Windows Server 2012 VM, I had no problem.I upgraded AI just after CMDB (no reboot).Though perhaps you should contact Rab (https://communities.bmc.com/communities/people/rab.boyce%40alderstone.com) it seems he had those kind of problems

Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade?

2013-02-28 Thread SUBSCRIBE ARSLIST theReel
Hi Guys, Is there a specific reason you should re-engineer overlays with granular overlays before upgrading applications? We have a 7.6.04 SP2 ITSM install (windows/SQL) on which we have implemented some customisations using the object overlay method available in 7.6. These are mostly basic

Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade?

2013-02-28 Thread Easter, David
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade? Hi Guys, Is there a specific reason you should re-engineer overlays with granular overlays before upgrading applications? We have a 7.6.04 SP2 ITSM install (windows/SQL) on which we have

Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade?

2013-02-28 Thread SUBSCRIBE ARSLIST theReel
Thanks for that David, The new granular overlays are a great step forward and should make upgrading/patching even easier in the future. In this case my reason for wanting to do the re-engineering at a later date is that we are considering doing an in-place upgrade. So if we can leave our

Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade?

2013-02-28 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE ARSLIST theReel Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:41 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade? Thanks for that David, The new granular overlays are a great step forward and should make

Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade?

2013-02-28 Thread Jason Miller
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade? Thanks for that David, The new granular overlays are a great step forward and should make upgrading/patching even easier in the future. In this case my reason for wanting to do the re

Re: Converting Overlays to Granular Overlays - before or after ITSM 8.1 upgrade?

2013-02-28 Thread SUBSCRIBE ARSLIST theReel
Thanks for the replies guys. That utility is built into the developer studio in 8.1 now and is indeed very handy when converting to granular overlays. What would be awesome would be if anything added/modified was a different colour, anything removed was faded etc or something along those