On Monday 16 September 2002 23:22, Martin Rowe wrote:
On Monday 16 September 2002 11:22 pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
[snip]
Can you supply some urls for me to test?
Try http://www.400times.co.uk which has some navigation 'bubbles' on the
left. In Galeon they appear in the browser window
Due to problems with our current mail archives and issues with the speed that
admin requests are handled we are moving the mailing list to asgardsrealm.net
which Jamin Collins hosts. This is a gracious offer on his part. Brad will
have the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail sent to the new list so no
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 13:49, Robert wrote:
That's 'their file name' assuming that hasn't already been picked up, and
it probably should mention that it doesn't search subdirectories of that
path. (It also ignores file~ but that's getting a bit arcane)
got that already, thanks.
Nope, I have not tried this wm. Just visited the web page where it
belongs. I could give it a whirl later today, perhaps. Will tell my
observations of how it behaves with java. (I'll try JRE's from Sun and
from IBM)
there were reports that fvwm was exhibiting similar symptoms.
On 25-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
One of the posts mentions SwingSet2 demo. Does anyone know what this is
and
where I can get it?
It's a demo showing off the Swing GUI toolkit. Dunno about Sun, but IBM
includes it with their SDK. Pretty nifty, I guess. Demonstrates that
Java is still
Yup, a bit exaggerated. The speed of the newest JVMs is great, if you
ask me. Most Java apps I use, run quite smoothly.
Btw, I experienced the bug with the Blackdown JRE too, but the problem
was more often too small dialogs than too big.(Like dialog sizes of 2x10
pixels and such) -
It was my understanding that it was based off of Blackbox.
Teach me to open my fool mouth... if it's based off of Blackbox, it's only
in spirit, 'cause even *I* can tell the two of them don't look anything
like each other.
Like Gnome would ever adopt anything written in C++ in the first
So here is one way to track down the Java bug.
Disable almost all of BlackboxWindow::BlackboxWindow(). Slowly enable line by
line until the bug occurs. At least then we know where and can learn why.
Also, I have heard the 0.62 does not demonstrate this problem but I have also
heard that it is
On 24-Jul-2002 Mr.X wrote:
I found something fairly interesting, thought I'd check here to see if
anybody else can reproduce it before I submit. Using Sylpheed (0.8.0),
if you hit the Get button a dialog pops up and shows the download
status of the mail. If you toggle the decor of this
On 24-Jul-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:23:53PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
As I see it the best we can manage would look like this.
process deleted
Didn't you just describe bbappconf/bblaunch? :)
yep, that was kind of the point (-:
Actually, it could be an interesting thing to solve (albeit a very minor
one):
when I open a window with a text form in it, sometimes it isn't the right
size to display the whole text, and having only the close-minimize buttons,
but
no handles, it is uncomfortable to scroll back forth.
On 23-Jul-2002 Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
I determined what changes I needed to make -- the beta series wheel
mouse patch only applies to switching workspaces, and thus only affected
Screen.cc; the original patch I had was from x0r, and also had code for
the window shading and thus
On 23-Jul-2002 D. Olson wrote:
Thank you so much! I applied the patch manually (cuz I don't know how to do
it properly and I don't feel like finding out atm) and I recompiled and made
an RPM. Yay! It works great.
cd blackbox
patch -p1 /path/to/patch
If you use windows with no decor or minimal decor or are a heavy bbtool user
please consider testing the cvs code. I made a few cleanups today which appear
to be sound but I would like to hear positive results from a few users.
Specifically:
does your window lose its close button unexpectedly?
if you toggle decor on and off does the decor change?
yep, the decor does change. one new thing that i did notice is that
windows without decor get it back on a bb restart, but then continue to
behave normally. what used to happen (and i'm not sure if this is a new
change or not) was the
Sorry, I am dumb... Is there a hot key to toggle this or something? Actually,
more importantly, is this a feature available beta3?
bbkeys has a binding for this there is no way to do it directly from blackbox.
As to the decorless window over a restart, I am looking into it.
excellent. keep up the good work!
for whatever reason the decor was not handled by the code which restores a
window on startup. I added in the code. Needs loads of testing.
It also seems to work fine across a restart. Only thing I can see is
when I un-decor a shaded window, it unshades (that's fine) but when I
re-decor it it stays unshaded. Is this intended? Not that it's a big
problem... I was just wondering if it was meant to do that.
Oh, and why or are a
On 23-Jul-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
I'm not sure quite what's caused it, but it was something to do with
switching decor on/off multiple times - two of the three windows I was
decor-switching have done it: now the decor draws in unfocused state
fine, but focused state doesn't update the decor
I would like to enquire about what sort of responsibility, and what the
requirements
are for maintaining the blackbox manpage. I would love to assist Blackbox
develop,
and considering I don't have the programming knowledge (at the moment), this
is a good place to start I believe.
One
On 22-Jul-2002 Brian Hechinger wrote:
it works. yay!!!
ok, here's what i needed to do. first of all, set the following
environmental
variables:
CC=/usr/bin/cc
CXX=/usr/bin/CC
CXXFLAGS='-LANG:std'
or for more optimization (what i used on my R10K Octane):
CFLAGS='-O2
I will update for 0.65 on Monday!
But after the summer I'll be starting a freesoftware project under
KDE, so i'll switch (for some time) to KDE as default desktop (to
learn more about it).
enjoy (-:
To make all my spare programming time available to the new project
next year I would
I will look over your patch and get back to you.
there are really only two changes that were made, first, '#include cstdlib'
was removed since MIPSpro doesn't use it, and second, std::abs() doesn't
exist
on MIPSpro so i had to use the abs() in the C math routines, and needed to
add
On 22-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
I did not bother trying to dig through the thousands of messages (-:
Yesterday evening I received a mail from one of Sun's people asking me to
please test under 1.4.1 beta they just released. Downloaded it this
morning.
I also forwarded them the URL that Roy
On 22-Jul-2002 Mike wrote:
I don't know what the big deal is. I'd just leave it, who cares, not worth
the time/thought/effort. If people are going to get all freaked out over
something like this, let 'em.
Cygwin is a more accurate depiction anyway so that is what the webpage now says.
Hmm, ok, count me in then. My first language is Dutch and my second is
English, so I don't really expect any problems with it. I'll look at the
current Dutch manuals to see what style they're written in (e.g. formal or
plain Dutch) and I'll just write the new ones just like it. If you
On 22-Jul-2002 Benjamin Bunck wrote:
Is it possible to associate a custom menu to a particular style?
Ben
No, sorry. The style is simply a layer of paint it does not affect the
underlying structure.
On 18-Jul-2002 Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
re, all
bbconf 1.8 is set loose. This fixes a small buglet in the keybinding
editor whereby you'd go, like, hey, add me one of them command thingeys,
and bbconf would go, like, sure, dude, but wouldn't really do anything.
Or something like
I have verified that this library IS available with ldconfig -v. Any
tips on how I can get the configure script to properly detect the
installed qt-libraries ?
libqt-mt is different from libqt. libqt-mt is what KDE uses. Perhaps
that will help you track it down.
does bbconf actually
I have verified that this library IS available with ldconfig -v. Any
tips on how I can get the configure script to properly detect the
installed qt-libraries ?
libqt-mt is different from libqt. libqt-mt is what KDE uses. Perhaps
that will help you track it down.
xOr
Isn't just
unless you have libqt-mt-devel or whatever your dist calls it the configure
script won't find it.
Yep, like I said, I have all the development files installed as well.
(libqt3-devel-3.0.4 package). I also jsut noticed that someone has filed
a bug on the same problem at bbconf.sf.net.
This was intended, since libqt-mt is more commonly used than libqt.
The -devel files for this however becomes funny. When I install qt from the
source, I have to reconfigure teh source dir (the headers etc) to be mt
or not depending on what the app is wanting that I'm compiling. Perhaps
On 18-Jul-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
To whoever out there has the time/permission to make
changes to the blackboxwm.sf.net page, could you please
update my link on the screenshots page to be:
Scott Hurring http://hurring.com/screenshots/blackbox/
I mostly have screenshots of different styles
page updated as per the 3 requests.
Have a good day.
I added a new Tracker to sf.net: website. Add your screenshot urls, contents
adds/removes/changes, or whatever.
On 18-Jul-2002 paul wrote:
Subject says it all. I'm getting the source via the standard anonymous
cvs instruction provided by Sourceforge:
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\
/cvsroot/blackboxwm co blackbox
Let me know if you need more info.
TIA, PM
--
Paul Mackinney
[EMAIL
I have submitted a bug about the Java issue on the java.sun.com bug tracker.
Log outputs, an example program, and as much detail as possible was supplied.
No I really do not expect much in return. We shall see though.
I may need those of you who can easily reproduce the problem to submit info
When 0.65.0 is release I plan to take about a month off from blackbox hacking.
As some of you have commented my level of involvement is quite high and I am
neglecting other obligations. This will also give me a chance to clear my mind
and be fresh for the work ahead.
Bugs in 0.65.0 (if any are
I can not recreate the licq dock issue. Anyone?
What is the dock issue? I periodically use Licq and have seen no problem
with it.
fresh bug on the track stating that licq does not dock itself. They neglect to
state a version of blackbox so this may be an old bug that is no longer
On 18-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
Hi again,
I noticed that Norwegian language support is missing from the Blackbox
distribution. Perhaps I could do some translating, since Norwegian is my
mother tongue.(If the Blackbox maintainers are interested in this)
I'm afraid I would need some
Or you could just apt-get install bbconf (-:
And settle for 1.6??? (-:
I uploaded 1.8 this time last (Wed) night.
Arg! I really thought I understood how to check that a package was
installed, but apparently not.
when in doubt:
dpkg --get-selections|grep foo.
An easy way to add compiler options is to run the configure
script with a few special environment variables set to the
values you want.
CXX == c++ compiler
CXXFLAGS == compiler flags
When I build blackbox, I run configure like this ...
$ CXXFLAGS=-O2 -march=i586 -Wall ./configure
I just committed the code which allows Scroll Lock to disable blackbox's
keybindings. It is the last option in the Config menu.
*NOTE* you *MUST* do a make install or the new entry will *NOT* appear.
Unfortunately this also means anyone who maintains an NLS entry needs to send
me an update.
On 16-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your
chance to speak up!
In most cases, I've simply left the slit in it's default bottom center
On 16-Jul-2002 Es Bee Ex wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your
chance
to speak up!
I don't use it now but I have in the past. Why do you want to remove it?
I
On 14-Jul-2002 Gerrit Hoetzel wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:51:35PM +0200
Tig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
crazy throught, no idea about programming possiblities and all that... I
see this kind of thing a bit. Someone has any idea, seems resonable to a
number of people, not so useful or
On 15-Jul-2002 Mike wrote:
Hey,
I updated Johannes Winkelmann's 0.65.0alpha2 aa patch, originally from
http://www.hta-bi.bfh.ch/~winkj/. Works pretty well :)
40k is a bit much to send out to a list I figure, so just grab it from my
site:
On 15-Jul-2002 Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
But since neither of them (Shaleh and Wilson) seemed very
thrilled about that one, I just came up with a another
suggestion...
Don't include me in that... I support the idea of changing it at compile
time.
Sure, but did Shaleh's suggestion apply to
given that i started this thread i think it's time for me to
apologize for doing so. :)
this is a common issue on the list, do not feel bad.
Basically we have two main groups of people. There is the old timer who has
used blackbox since before 0.50. They like it just like it is
On 15-Jul-2002 Ciprian Popovici wrote:
Quoting Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Give me real, valid reasons and explanations and I can be swayed. But
also expect me to give you equally valid reasons against.
Which reminds me :) that none of the messages against window tabs have
If this could be wrapper into a separate class, the #ifdef would be in
one place only and therefore not really disturbing the source (except
for the font code). Plus it would simplify the rest of the code a bit
by remove some duplicated code - even if you don't plan to implement AA
On 15-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
Hi there
I know many people here oppose most new feature suggestions, and I
understand, I think most Blackbox users will agree when I say that we
don't won't a bloated and big wm. That being said, I would still like to
point out a little issue that I
On 15-Jul-2002 Marco Fioretti wrote:
FYI, this is the conclusion of the story. Any comment/explanation/
further trick arer appreciated, as I confess I don't understand
completely why the solution below works.
It sounds like FrameMaker was designed for Solaris where the X server is always
On 15-Jul-2002 Derek Cunningham wrote:
Could the website maintainer (Shaleh?) please update the link to my
screenshots. I've included considerably more info here:
http://www.nosleep.ca/screenshots.html
Which will answer the 2 or 3 emails I receive each week. :)
On my todo list.
On 15-Jul-2002 Reinaldo Nolasco Sanches wrote:
http://slackware.linuxbr.org/ss.jsp
but this eventualy can change...
...put in BlackBox site :)
yours too.
1) you typically won't want to send i've just clicked the lmb, but
show me the menu. for this to work, blackbox would have to have
keybindings, which is not the case... kinda chicken and egg.
That is the preferred solution, but there seems to be lots of resistance
to the
On 15-Jul-2002 Es Bee Ex wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once this is fully working then we move on to
library separation. In here we also have the bbtools rewrite -- pager,
keys,
etc.
Do you have an outline of blackboxlib
On 16-Jul-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:27:11AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
post 0.65.0 there will most likely be a away to access the root menu via the
toolbar which will assist those running in rootless mode.
The version of blackbox provided by fink has had
Myself, I use Mod4Mask, which is the Windows key on your average keyboard.
Shaleh, is there some reason this can't be added to configure as a
changeable option at build time? It gets asked a LOT.
I do not want to add any compile time options.
Giving people the ability to disable
On 14-Jul-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Giving people the ability to disable blackbox's bindings while working in
specific applications covers more of this need than simply changing the
keybinding would. Just abuot any binding
On 14-Jul-2002 Ciprian Popovici wrote:
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 7:43:43 PM, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13-Jul-2002 Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Sorry if this is a complete nonsense, but is it possible now / after
some coding to have blackbox treat several windows as one
Ok, then how about offering the user the opportunity to
disable keybindings on a given workspace?!
sorry, it would be hard to get it per workspace.
On 13-Jul-2002 Robert wrote:
Having just installed bblaunch, I notice some misleading messages
$ bblaunch -s -w 4 pan
# no errors
$ bblaunch -s -w 5 pan
Warning: XGetCommand can't allocate enough memory
Yes there is a workspace 5 and it starts anyway (in wksp 5)
Also
bblaunch -w 4
I didn't know about openbox. In the office I have stock RH 7.2, which
doesn't have gnome 2 has it? I'll try it at home, though.
openbox is a fork of blackbox 0.62.1. They basically did a lot of the same
work as the 0.65 series (STL, cleanups) as well as new stuff -- netwm, wheel
mouse,
It would still be nice to have Blackbox support showing the menu in
response to a bbkey event. It would also be nice to have Balckbox
support navigation of the menu via the arrow keys. There seems to be a
lot of resistance to doing this in Blackbox though. Whatever.
the goal is to
On 13-Jul-2002 Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Sorry if this is a complete nonsense, but is it possible now / after
some coding to have blackbox treat several windows as one?
It would've saved me a few seconds (and writing this email :) right now
if I could somehow move several windows across the
Why not take out the menu and call it bbmenu? It could have its own
keybindings or be incorporated with bbkeys somehow. Doing this you would have
to let people decide for themself (probably in .blackboxrc) what a
right-click on the background should start.
This may be a bad idea, I don't
That is in fact how oroborus (an even more minimalistic window manager than
blackbox) has always functioned. It provides no menus internally.
sawfish too, and others.
Personally, I believe a wm should be usable without 3rd party additions. Not
100% how we'd like, but usable.
On 14-Jul-2002 neuron wrote:
Posted this thread on a messageboard not related to bb, and got in reply that
I may wanna try this mailing list, so I am :)
running Maya on linux is SWEET, but .. I can't seem to get it working well in
my favorite window managers.
not the first time this has
On 12-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
Just wanted to point out that I just experienced the dialog problem with
LimeWire running JRE1.4.1 from Sun (the newest, as far as I know).
Problem does not seem to be specifically related to just JBuilder, but
perhaps it's worse with JBuilder than
I expect the output to look this (non Java app)
0xe048ec: before manage (259, 172) w: 800, h: 600
0xe048ec: initial (259, 172) w: 800, h: 600
0xe048ec: after hints (259, 172) w: 800, h: 600
0xe048ec: sizes reflect the frame from now on
0xe048ec: after upsize (0, 0) w: 802, h: 619
0xe048ec: after
On 12-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:23:53 +0200
Øyvind Stegard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to point out that I just experienced the dialog problem with
LimeWire running JRE1.4.1 from Sun (the newest, as far as I know).
Problem does not seem to be
Let me parse this for everyone, so they can understand my frustration.
0x28000a9: fallback configure (0, 18) w: 1012, h: 783
we received a configure notify BEFORE we had managed the window, so we blindly
applied it. The numbers printed are the ones from the configure event, no
tweaking.
On 12-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
There's been lots of discussion on the problems with JBuilder/Java dialog
problems, but I've lost track of what I can do next to be of help.
Anything I can do at this point? I've got a box here running JBuilder 6,
and I'm ready to help out.
-Roy
I
All I can say is, man, Java is weird.
It's not weird, it's advanced (little humor from the Debian list) =^).
(-:
Isn't the source for the Blackdown implementation available? Looks like
it is:
http://blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/support/faq-release/FAQ-java-linux-8.html
#ss8.4
I
On 12-Jul-2002 Ben Jansens wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 July 2002 11:35 am, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Let me parse this for everyone, so they can understand my frustration.
0x28000a9: fallback configure (0, 18) w: 1012, h: 783
Does twm not pass
On 12-Jul-2002 Gerrit Hoetzel wrote:
Isn't there still a 'stay on top' feature for normal windows missing ?
read on, only if you are realy interested :-)
I have to write some sentences more, so that the mail robot does not
complain about a too short message.
I haven't yet had a
On 11-Jul-2002 Tim Howe wrote:
For some reason ghostview's interface doesn't seem to work under blackbox. I
am using Blackbox 0.62.1 on OpenBSD 3.1 and on another machine running
OpenBSD-current. I have the same problem on both boxes.
I can use ghostview just fine in fvwm, so I am pretty
On 11-Jul-2002 Georg Nikodym wrote:
One feature that I haven't seen mentioned is context sensitivity. I
would like the ability to have keys do different things when the pointer
is over the root window versus other WM decorations. I'd also like to
be able to pass certain keys through to
3) open windows list in root menu and scroll it via keyboard is even
better
because of the separation of bbkeys and blackbox, menu scrolling is not going
to happen.
On 11-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
Blackbox, they open way too big (as in much larger than the actual screen
size).
Any thoughts on what's up? Is BB providing some hinting
Have you or a friend recently been through a college programming course where
they forced you to learn Java? Now is your chance to use this knowledge to
help the blackbox community.
We are receiving reports of odd sized windows. Transients, main windows, all
of them. Simple programs which
WM_NORMAL_HINTS(WM_SIZE_HINTS):
program specified location: 278, 241
program specified size: 1054 by 743
window gravity: NorthWest
this is the baffling bit. Blackbox is doing EXACTLY what the program asked it
to do. These hints are set when
On 11-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
this is the baffling bit. Blackbox is doing EXACTLY what
the program asked it to do.
Weird. Anyone with any sort of familiarity with another wm have any idea
what they are doing that is different?
-Roy
I have read the twm, wmaker, and E code. Near as
On 11-Jul-2002 Ben Rasmussen wrote:
Hello,
Mandrake generates a blackbox menu automatically. Just include
/etc/X11/blackbox/blackbox-menu in your blackbox menu. You can also edit it
using the menudrake utility. In menudrake, make sure you change your
environment to blackbox.
same name
Enclosed is the verbose patch i mentioned on the Java thread.
gunzip verbose.patch.gz
cd blackbox
patch -p0 /path/to/verbose.patch
make
when you run the new binary the path from initial request to final display has
a print whenever the window size would have changed. There are also additional
Does twm/others set some sort of root hint that it could be using? Does
blackbox? I can't think of another way for it to behave differently..
xprop on root shows no hints under twm, wmaker sets a few. I really see
nothing.
I am hoping the user tests will at least give me enough
On 11-Jul-2002 Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
Enclosed is the verbose patch i mentioned on the Java thread.
Are you still willing to install a Java-app. and try for
yourself? I've just created (read: modified an existing)
one which reproduces the error 1 time out of 2-5 times you
try...
On 11-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
OK, here's what I've done:
* Applied verbose patch and enabled debugging in blackbox (perhaps I
shouldn't have done that ?)
* Started X with nothing but blackbox (Directed output from blackbox to
file (both STDERR and OUT))
* Opened an aterm
*
Ok, to further track this down, I added a new print much earlier in the
process. This is the absolute earliest that blackbox is aware of the window
and 100% could have done nothing to affect it. No X calls have been made on
the client's behalf at this point.
Apply it on top of the previous
On 11-Jul-2002 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Ok, to further track this down, I added a new print much earlier in the
process. This is the absolute earliest that blackbox is aware of the window
and 100% could have done nothing to affect it. No X calls have been made on
the client's behalf
On 11-Jul-2002 Nils Grundback wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:23:33 -0400
Roy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
Blackbox, they open way too big (as in much larger than the actual
We are receiving reports of odd sized windows. Transients, main
windows, all of them. Simple programs which open and modify windows
sizes AND demonstrate this bug would be VERY helpful.
Attached is a simple GUI java app which can reproduce the problem ~ 1 in 5
times under Blackbox
On 12-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as I commented on the other thread, my second patch has a small problem.
s/xmaprequest.parent/xmaprequest.window/;
Grrr I thought I'd gotten all of those
On 12-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Grrr I thought I'd gotten all of those. Should have use the FR
function rather than eyeballing it. =( If it would
but the window will also be moved down and right (exactly the borderwidths
of title bar and left border). When calling sylpheed repeatedly, its
window moves down all along.
I think it's a bug in the sylpheed code, but maybe related to blackbox.
Sylpheed is sending us a configure
On 10-Jul-2002 Sam Halliday wrote:
hmm,
you wanted testing of the new beta2... after use for ~24hours (well, not
all use... a night of it doing nothing and a day of work) i noticed that
slide bars under all my apps stopped working correctly. the apps were
using various toolkits, gtk+ ,
On 10-Jul-2002 Sam Halliday wrote:
slide bars under all my apps, can you explain this more? Provide a
sample app that shows this issue?
well i think scroll bar is the technical term, but it escaped me at the
time... it happenned under nedit, xmgrace and sylpheed-claws, the main
windows.
MIPSpro does not honor the C++ thing where variable scope is kept withing a
for loop (for example) and so in the instance where the same variable name
was
used twice in the same function within seperate scope, i had to change one to
be different so that MIPSpro could cope.
would i be
1 - 100 of 1036 matches
Mail list logo
